Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Sarah Vinluan
Chaminade University
Jessica Martinez
Spring 2018
BABY SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Most children do not begin to speak until they are between one and two years of age
(Barnes, 2010). This can make communication between a parent and infant very challenging
during the first couple years of life. Young children often throw tantrums as a result of not being
able to express themselves, which increases parent frustration. Proponents of infant sign
language believe that symbolic gestures can alleviate these frustrations, in addition to having
Around ten months of age, infants are able to grasp objects, hold up and give objects, and
point to objects of interests. These intentional gestures are called “deictic” (Barnes, 2010) or
“symbolic” (Goodwyn & Acredolo, 1993) gestures. At this age, an infant’s oral-motor skills are
underdeveloped in expressing themselves through spoken words, but their hands are able to
“Long before children are able to develop control of the articulatory actions required for
meaningful oral communication beyond babbling, they master many gross motor skills used in
manual modes of communication, such as sign language” (Barnes, 2010, p. 23). This is one
reason why many believe that sign language can solve the communication barrier in the first two
years in life. Symbolic gesturing tends to be acquired more easily at earlier ages compared to
vocal language (Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown, 2000). This has led to the development of baby
sign language.
Baby sign language is not a complete sign language system (Barnes, 2010). Instead, it
uses simple gestures such as lip smacking to mean “fish”, a swooping arm motion to mean
BABY SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT 3
“plane”, palms facing up and out to ask “where is it?” and a finger tap to communicate “more”
(Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown, 2000). These gestures are easy for both the parent and infant, as
well as being effective for communicating interests, observations, needs and wants.
Advocates of baby sign language report of the many benefits that can come about from
using it. These benefits include reduced frustration for infants as it gives them a way to express
child and caregiver and even early language development (Barnes, 2010). Although there are
many reported benefits, scholarly evidence and empirical studies have found conflicting
Studies have shown that baby sign language can have a positive influence on both
expressive and receptive language. In a study by Goodwyn, Acredolo, and Brown (2000),
researchers observed that baby sign language allowed infants to express their observations in
daily life with a surprising amount of detail. Without the infant's’ ability to communicate through
gestures, this ability would otherwise go undetected. In a 1998 study by Goodwyn and Acredolo,
their results showed that infants signed their first word a little bit before they verbally spoke their
first word, however, both occurred around 12 months. The difference between the first signed
and verbally said word, which was less than a month apart, was not significant. In regards to
receptive language, the results of this study also suggested that baby sign language fosters the
Some research studies have suggested that using baby sign language can increase the rate
of vocabulary acquisition. Goodwyn and Acredolo (1998) suggest that the more symbolic
gestures that an infant learns, the larger the infant’s verbal vocabulary will be by the end of their
second year. Studies done by Seal and DePaolis (2014) and by Goodwyn and Acredolo (1998),
both show evidence that infants who learned baby sign language verbally said more words and
specific target words earlier than their peers who did not learn baby sign language. Although this
suggests that baby sign language speeds up the rate of verbal vocabulary development, the
differences between the two groups of infants were not extremely significant.
One of the most well documented factors that affect language acquisition is the amount of
language directed to the child, also call infant directed speech (Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown,
2000). In a study conducted by Goodwyn, Acredolo, and Brown (2000), their results showed an
increase of infant directed speech among parents and infants who used baby sign language. The
researchers found that symbolic gesturing seemed to “pull” infant-directed speech from
caregivers as they acknowledge an infant’s message or elaborated on it. In addition, they also
noticed that baby sign language led to greater opportunities to use infant directed speech as the
Topic Selection
When speaking with typically developing infants, the conversation is often controlled and
led by the adult. The results in a study done by Goodwyn, Acredolo, and Brown (2010) suggest
that baby sign language allows the infant to control the topic of the conversation or activity. The
symbolic gestures made by the infant increases the chance that adults will figure out what the
BABY SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT 5
child wants to talk about and shift their own attention to that interest. This shared focus makes it
more likely that any information that the parent provides about the object of focus will make a
lasting impression on the child because infants tend to pay better attention to objects that they are
genuinely interested in (Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown, 2010). Ultimately, this teaches infants
how valuable language can be, encouraging them to explore other forms of communication such
as speaking.
Some argue against using baby sign language as they fear it will overload an infant’s
working memory or hinder spoken language acquisition (Seal & DePaolis, 2014). Others argue
that enabling a child to communicate nonverbally will decrease the child’s willingness to learn
how to articulate words (Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown, 2000). A study done by Seal and
DePaolis (2014) show evidence that as infants grow, their symbolic gestures accompany
vocalizations with increased frequency. Their results also show that as young children learn
From the information and evidence presented in this review, baby sign language does not
seem to hinder verbal language acquisition. However, the benefits may not be as significant as
reported. In children who signed their first word before saying their first word, the difference
was not significant. This is also true for studies that argued baby sign language increased the rate
of vocabulary acquisition.
In regards to the other benefits, such as increased infant directed speech and infant
engagement in topic selection of conversations, these may be due to the caregivers’ efforts to
create a language-rich environment. The caregivers who participated in many of these studies
BABY SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT 6
became more invested in their infant’s language development. The intense language interactions,
environment, and support may ultimately be the reason for the many benefits of baby sign
language.
Conclusion
The current literature about the impact baby sign language has on early language
development covers many potential benefits. However, these benefits are not as significant as
they are reported to be. Also, the cause of the benefits may actually be the increased parent
signing with infants are not recent. More current information should be studied in American
families who decided to use baby sign language with their infants.
BABY SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT 7
REFERENCES
Barnes, K. (2010). Sign Language With Babies: What Difference Does It Make? Dimensions of
Early Childhood, 38, 21-29. Retrieved June 9, 2018, from EBSCOhost database.
Goodwyn, S., & Acredolo, L. (1993). Symbolic Gesture versus Word: Is There a Modality
Advantage for Onset of Symbol Use? Child Development, 64, 688-701. Retrieved June 9,
Goodwyn, S., & Acredolo, L. (1998). Encouraging Symbolic Gestures: A New Perspective on
the Relationship Between Gesture and Speech. New Direction for Child Development, 79,
Goodwyn, S., Acredolo, L., & Brown, C. (2000). Impact of Symbolic Gesturing on Early
Seal, B., & DePaolis, R. (2014). Manual Activity and Onset of First Words in Babies Exposed
and Not Exposed to Baby Signing. Sign Language Studies, 14, 444-465. Retrieved June