Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Mark Beauchamp
4/20/18
Since its foundation Canada has had a vast history regarding immigration, what we see
today as a multicultural nation was once far more rigid and closed. Economic interests drove
immigration policy in Canada’s capitalist society, creating systemic racism and issues
concerning minority groups immigrating to Canada. In the modern era, we have a perfect
example of a tool for immigration that breeds discrimination, the Canadian Points System.
Derived in 1967, the Canadian Points System is a system which allows immigrants into Canada
should they have enough points based on their qualifications. These qualifications are comprised
of six factors, language, education, experience, age, arranged employment in Canada and
adaptability. (Government of Canada) Despite only the best immigrants coming into the country,
immigrants struggle to find jobs that meet their qualifications due to discrimination and a lack of
jobs entirely. Canada accepts highly skilled and educated immigrants but we often see that
these immigrants struggle due to a lack of employers hiring them for jobs they’re qualified
for, this subsequently forces highly skilled immigrants to search for low paying jobs. The
Canadian Points System creates a false image of what Canada values most due to an emphasis
being placed on certain qualifications over others with points. Looking back at Canada’s history
Colonies were seen as areas that could put to good use the surplus of workers that countries like
Britain were experiencing during the Industrial Revolution. When Confederation came around,
Canada needed all the workers they could get and for the first 30 years had little to no policy
barring people from entering Canada. From 1896 to 1914 over 3 million people emigrated to
Canada which cause an industrial and agricultural boom in those respective industries. In 1906
the Immigration Act was amended to enable greater powers when selecting immigrants coming
into the country, essentially allowing the government to weed out undesirable people. The
undesirables were made undesirable by their race and country of origin. (Kelley and Trebilcock,
12-13) This policy change indicated Canada’s shift in immigration policy and led to further
racism being developed, this manifested itself in World War II when Canada went to war against
Japan.
In 1939, the world had been plunged into World War II, Europe had erupted into chaos
and the Pacific began ramping up in combat. Canada was an independent country in 1939 and
yet entered the war alongside Britain as it became evident that the Axis were set in conquest.
Britain and Canada were not at war with the Empire of Japan in 1939, Japan had been focused on
its conquest of China and had not bothered the colonies Britain held in the Pacific. That all
changed in 1941 when the Empire of Japan had launched simultaneous attacks on the American
naval base of Pearl Harbor, Wake Island, Guam, British colonies of Malaya and Hong Kong.
With no formal declaration of war by the Japanese, Canada was dragged into the Pacific war as
there were Canadian troops involved in the defence of Hong Kong. (Veterans Affairs Canada)
Domestically, Japanese Canadians were fearful of what the Canadian government’s
reaction would be against them. Canada and Japan were now at war and although they were of
Japanese descent they had decided to the live their lives in Canada. The most immediate
reaction from the Canadian government was a formal declaration of war against the Empire of
Japan and Canadian authorities “expressing its confidence in the loyalty of Japanese alien and
Canadian-born Japanese in B.C.” (Sunahara 27) Shortly after 38 Japanese aliens were detained
by the RCMP, they consisted of local Japanese council leaders and veterans of the Japanese
imperial army. Additionally, Japanese fishermen along the BC coastline were ordered to bring in
their vessels for confiscation. The confiscation and impounding of Japanese fishing vessels was
justified by the authorities as a matter of national security. With the war in the Pacific theater
growing and the Japanese Imperial Army seeming increasingly unstoppable fear began to spread
in British Columbia that their province would be a target. British Columbian officials were
becoming increasingly blatant with their views for what should be done with the Japanese
Canadian population. The premier demanded that the federal government get rid of them, 5
mayors demanded for their internment and BC MPs demanded for action. (Sunahara 31) Both
the Premier of BC and the Commander in Chief of the Canadian army in the Pacific theater
shared the racist view that the Japanese Canadian population posed a threat and had to be
deposed. The justification for their idea was to provide an air of safety for BC civilians and
insure that no inter race riots occurred. On the 14th of January 1942, the federal government
appeased the demands of the British delegation and forced the relocation of Japanese Canadian
males living on the coastline of BC. Furthermore, the ships of Japanese Canadian fisherman
were to be sold to non-Japanese Canadian people and they were prohibited from using short
wave radios. (Sunahara 37) These sets of policies highlighted Canada’s willingness to paint an
entire immigrant population with one broad brush stroke when pushed by racist and
discriminatory beliefs.
The Japanese Canadian people were not the only ones to be racially targeted by the
Canadian Government, Prime Minister Makenzie King was a fierce anti Semite. When ships
with Jewish refugees came to Canada seeking safety from Nazi Germany they were turned away
even though they faced certain death if they returned to Europe. (Kelley and Trebilcock, 16)
During the whole time the Nazi government was in power Canada had only accepted around
In the modern era, Canada has tried to shed its skin from the past and shifted politically
into a multicultural society, its image now being a country that gladly accepts immigrants into its
country. (Gagnon, Erica, et al.) With such a small population for its size Canada relies on
immigrants to keep its population steadily increasing. It presents many imagined pull factors
that draws immigrants from around the world, quality of living, free healthcare and level of
education. Canada also requires immigrants to help fill the gaps and low paying jobs that
ordinary Canadian civilians do not want to do. This idea has evolved even further with
temporary workers who work in Canada for a certain time period and then are sent back home.
These kinds of workers are on work visas and work for less then the minimum wage, they’re also
not provided with any health care and cannot form a union. These migrant workers provide
cheap labour and are exploited all the time in Canada. (Choudry, Henaway 3-5) Due to their
illegality in the country, these workers have no one to go to for protection and aid. If these
workers do appeal to authorities they’re often detained in dentation facilities for illegal aliens.
Despite Canada attempting to look like an accepting country with multiple benefits it still
discriminates against low skilled workers, using them solely for cheap labour and nothing else.
Detention centers are distinct from normal ordinary Canadian jails, detention centers are
not punitive and in theory serve only as a means of holding illegal aliens until deportation or
processing. People who are not legally allowed in Canada are sent to these detention centers all
over Canada. Canadian detention centers claim to not be like normal Canadian prisons, and yet
they have many similar features, orange jump suits, solitary confinement and strip searches.
(Maynard 165) The most common group of people among these immigrants are people from the
Caribbean and Africa. Many of them came as immigrants but were denied and remained
illegally. If caught illegal aliens are sent to these detention facilities to await deportation, if they
had committed a crime they must first serve their time and then be deported. This idea of double
punishment was Canada’s way of deterring crime that they perceived was caused mainly by
immigrants. Cases such as 1994’s robbery of a Just Desserts restaurant by 2 black men and the
killing of a police officer fueled the Canadian publics view that immigrants, Jamaican
immigrants in this case, were causing widespread crime and had to stopped. These crimes were
highly mediatized and because of this it only amplified anti black immigrant sentiment.
(Maynard 172)
Canada like many other western nations practices border imperialism, it criminalizes
migration and punishes those who try and enter illegally. Canada insures that the process allows
the best and brightest of immigrants into the country but denies less educated or skilled
individuals. (Walia 53) Less educated and skilled individuals may come to Canada as temporary
migrants simply for labor work but must return after their contract is done. This highlights
Canada’s desire to only allow immigrants who demonstrate usefulness beyond simply being a
labour resource. This process is also highly racialized, there is a racialized hierarchy present
where the process of accepting immigrants allow white individuals over others. Other factors
that come into play with the immigration process are things like political, economic and social
attributes. If an individual seeking citizenship is higher up on the economic or social ladder that
gives them a better chance of entering the country. (Walia 61) Naturally, immigrants from poorer
nations are discriminated against due to their misfortunes. Looking back to Canada only
accepting temporary migrants for labour work we can see that these migrants are the ones
Canada would normally deny if they sought immigration to Canada. Canada insures that migrant
workers have families to provide for their origin country to not tempt them to seek legal status in
Canada. They also limit migrant workers to a certain number of years that they can work in
Canada before not being allowed back. In countries such as the gulf states operate this program
on an even larger scale, migrant workers from south east Asian countries and India go to the oil
rich gulf states to work as low wage construction workers. It is estimated that migrant workers
represent 40% of the population in these states. (Walia 67) Overall according to the International
Labour Organization there are 68 million migrant workers across the world and Canada adds to
that figure every year. Migrant workers serve as Canada’s ability to accept high skilled and
educated immigrants through the Canadian Points System and yet be able to afford cheap labour
Canada in the past has had a very inconsistent record when looking at immigration
policy, things like the Japanese interment or refusal to accept Jewish refugees points to a time
where Canada’s leaders and people held racist views. Today, Canada tries to forget the past and
focuses on being perceived as a multicultural society that is accepting of all immigrants. While
it is true that they accept people who wish to immigrate to the country, the criteria turns many
away. Canada is in look for talented and skilled individuals from other country’s and nothing
else. When people who don’t reach the criteria try and move to Canada they’re turned away or
detained in detention facilities that mimic real prisons. If Canada is in need of cheap manual
labour they just bring in migrant workers who have no hope of actually living in the country,
they’re just brought over then sent away. The tool which separated highly skilled immigrants
from low skilled immigrants is the Canadian Points System, the Canadian Points System is what
sets the criteria and determines whether or not an immigrant may immigrate to Canada. Despite
the Canadian Points System accepting these highly skilled immigrants, they face, much like in
the past, discrimination and are forced to apply for low paying jobs that they’re overqualified for.
qualifications in points. According to the Government of Canada, there is a total of 100 points to
be earned from six factors and an immigrant requires 67 or more to be accepted as a federal
skilled worker. The six factors are language skills worth 28 points, education worth 25 points,
experience worth 15 points, age worth 12 points, arranged employment in Canada worth 10
points and adaptability worth 10 points. Language skills is separated into two parts, first official
language which is English (24 points) and second official language which is French (four
and writing abilities are all worth six points if they achieve a level of nine or higher; if their level
is below seven they’re not eligible. For second official language an immigrant needs a level five
or higher in all four categories for full points. For education, an immigrants level of degree or
diploma translates into a set of points. For example, the lowest diploma, a high school diploma,
is worth 5 points while a university degree at a PhD level is worth the maximum of 25 points.
For experience, an immigrant receives points based off of how many years they’ve worked a
full-time job. One year, the lowest, counts for nine points while six or more counts for a full 15
points. For age, an immigrant’s age gives them a set amount of points. Individuals below 18 or
above 47 receive zero points while 18-35 receives a full 12 points, anyone above 35 loses a point
per year until 46. For arranged employment in Canada, an immigrant must have a valid job offer
that offers full time work, it may not be seasonal and be at least for a year. Finally, for
adaptability an immigrant it rewards points based on the fact if they have a spouse or partner
who will immigrate with them to Canada. Based on their spouse or partner’s grading themselves
an immigrant can earn either five or 10 points. (Government of Canada) The system functions so
that certain aspects like language and education can carry more weight over other factors such as
an arranged appointment in Canada. (Beach, 9) Its important to understand how the Canadian
Points System works because if we hope it improve upon it we first must understand how it
functions currently. As of right now, it’s clear that the Canadian Government language and
education above all others. This is interesting because despite education being seen as so
valuable that’s not translating into educated immigrants finding well paid jobs. (Oreopoulos,
149)
To many immigrants, Canada has a lot of pull factors. Pull factors such as job
and industry, Canada has a lot to offer from an outside perspective. (“'Pull' Factors: Why
Canada?”) The Canadian Points System reinforces this idea by only allowing the best into the
country, valuing categories such as work experience and level of education the most. This
creates an understanding that once an immigrant gets admitted into Canada that they’ll be able to
find a job that fits with their qualification. The reality is that there is a lack of jobs and level of
discrimination that forces immigrants to lower their expectations and take low paying jobs just to
survive. In 2011, the average annual income of a non-immigrant in Canada was $75,200 while
in comparison a recent immigrant had an annual income of $48,700. (Barry, 86) We know that to
get into Canada immigrants must have a sufficient level of skills and education, yet immigrant
families are earning far less in comparison to non-immigrant families. (Barry, 86) This issue
highlights one of the main issues with the Canadian Points System, it creates this idea that if you
come to Canada people will find value in your skills. If not, why would Canada places such a
high value on job experience in the first place. What separates an immigrant with a University
degree vs an immigrant with a high school diploma if they’re simply going to have the same low
paying job?
When it comes to finding a job as a recent immigrant it can be hard. According to the
2006 census, the unemployment rate for recent immigrants was 10.4% while the unemployment
rate for non-immigrants was 5.9%. (Oreopoulos, 149) In order to understand why immigrants
that passed the Points System were struggling financially on average in Canada, a researcher
decided to look at how hard it was to get a job as an immigrant. In a 2008 study by Philip
Oreopoulos, 13 000 resumes were sent out to Toronto based companies by email in order to
determine why there was a gap in unemployment with the labour industry. These resumes were
sent in in groupings of five (type zero to five), each resume having some information changes
slightly compared to the other. The first type of resume had an English sounding name,
Canadian degree and Canadian job experience. The second type had a foreign sounding name
but still had a Canadian degree and Canadian job experience. The third type had a foreign
sounding name, a foreign degree but Canadian job experience. The fourth type had a foreign
sounding name, a foreign degree and mixed job experience. The fifth type had a foreign
sounding name, a foreign degree and foreign job experience. (Oreopoulos, 153) The results from
this study showed that candidates with resumes with English sounding names, Canadian
education and Canadian job experience had an 16% call back rate from employers. In
comparison, call backs from employers for candidates with foreign sounding names, foreign
degrees and foreign experience was only 6%. An interesting note to make was that resumes
were not affected too much by whether or not a degree was foreign or Canadian but when it
came to experience it changed from 6% for foreign experience to 8.5% for Canadian job
experience. Ultimately, the results indicated that companies, at least in the Toronto area,
preferred Canadian workers but also valued heavily whether or not an individual had prior
experience working a Canadian job. This is likely one contributing factor to the difference
between recent immigrant and non-immigrant households. If a recent immigrant had not
previously worked in Canada then it makes it much harder for them to find that first initial well-
The Canadian Points System has been the subject of change over the course of its
existence. For example, in 1992 the requirement for entering was 70 and categories such as age
and experience were not as valued. (Green and Green, 1010) The Canadian Points System has
been changed to increase and decrease the number of immigrants coming into the country at any
time, but it also can be changed to improve the criteria for which they quantify immigrants with.
A primary recommendation I would make to improve the points system would be to change the
work experience category. The category would consist of attributing five points of the 15 it
holds and allocate it to whether or not the applicant had one year or more of job experience in
Canada. The biggest issue when looking at the 13,000 resume study was the difference
Canadian work experience made in comparison to foreign work experience. (Oreopoulos, 167-
169) The Canadian Points System telegraphs to immigrants essentially what Canada is looking
for and what it wants. If Canadian work experience is a sub category within work experience it
would incentivise immigrants to first work temporarily in Canada, get that job experience, then
apply to immigrate there. This change would also benefit them once they immigrate because
they then have an even greater chance of a job waiting there for them.
Through history we can see that Canada has had its ups and low downs with immigration.
Many immigrants even today face the same sort of discrimination as in the past. For example,
Japanese internment and modern-day detention facilities. Canada has become very selective of
who comes into the country despite their image of being accepting of all. The Canadian Points
System has been Canada’s best attempt at attracting and accepting only the most talented, skilled
and educated immigrants to the country. Although it attracts the best, it fails to provide expected
jobs and causes over qualified immigrants to work low paying jobs. The expectations that
Canada and the Points System creates turns into falsehoods for most immigrants. The change I
have recommended was made in order to help immigrants understand more of what Canada’s
labour industry is looking for and to help them have a better chance at finding a job that they are
properly qualified for. The change however, is not so significant enough that it tarnishes the
chances of any immigrant hopeful to live in Canada without prior experience working there. It
merely signals an important asset that the labour industry clearly values according to studies.
Works Cited
Population, Vol 43, Iss 1-2, Pp 78-116 (2016), no. 1-2, 2016, p. 78. EBSCOhost,
doi:10.25336/P64609.
Beach, Charles M., et al. “Impacts of the Point System and Immigration Policy Levers on Skill
Choudry, Aziz, and Mostafa Henaway. “Temporary Agency Worker Organizing in an Era of
Gagnon, Erica, et al. “Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21.” Canadian Multiculturalism
multiculturalism-policy-1971.
citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/express-entry/become-
candidate/eligibility/federal-skilled-workers/six-selection-factors-federal-skilled-
workers.html.
Green, Alan G., and David A. Green. “Canadian Immigration Policy: The Effectiveness of the
Point System and Other Instruments.” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue
Canadienne D'Economique, vol. 28, no. 4b, 1995, pp. 1006–1041. JSTOR, JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/136133.
Kelley, Ninette, and Michael J Trebilcock. The Making of the Mosaic. University of Toronto
Press, 2010.
Oreopoulos, Philip. “Why Do Skilled Immigrants Struggle in the Labor Market? A Field
www.healthworkermigration.com/resources/hwm-reports/destination-country-
reports/iehp-report/51-section-1-deciding-to-leave-and-come-to-canada/162-qpullq-
factors-why-canada.html.
Sunahara, Ann Gomer. Politics of Racism. James Lorimer and Company, 1981.
Veterans Affairs Canada. “Canada and the War in the Far East.” Canadians in South East Asia -
The Second World War - History - Remembrance - Veterans Affairs Canada, 28 Nov.
2017, www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/remembrance/history/second-world-war/southeast-
asia/vfe-back.