Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Preface
In this cement industry report, we highlight short term & long-term risks which, we believe, could affect cement stocks performance in near
term. We believe the effects of prevailing expansionary cycle would last longer due to excessive supply compared to demand. Since demand
is positively correlated with economic growth, which is expected to drop in FY19, hence local cement demand is likely to trim after recording
a significant growth of 15% in FY18.
Higher coal, gas & oil prices would further exaggerate the prevailing situation where cement companies, particularly north players, are
already feeling the heat of softer cement prices. Given the coal price outlook in backwardation, we see higher coal prices is one of the key
short-term risks. Additionally, escalating oil prices is expected to lift power cost of local cement companies during FY19, which we believe is
another short-term risk.
Since the cement industry has not fully absorbed the capacity additions of third expansionary cycle, price softness is likely to persist despite
the rising fuel & power costs. Cement companies have added 2.11mtpa to overall industry capacity during FY18 which is expected to touch
7.34mtpa at the end of FY19 and 18.42mtpa at the end of FY21. As a result of this, south capacity would clock in at 16.84mtpa, representing
22% of industry capacity, while north capacity would cross 53.83mtpa, indicating 78% of industry capacity. We believe north based cement
companies would face a stiff price competition post commencement of planned expansions thus leading to further price softness. We have
assumed cement price of PKR 550/bag for south & PKR 540/bag for north players for FY19 and thereafter 2% growth going forward.
The cement stocks has substantially underperformed by 30% since the start of FY18 mainly due to capacity additions by north & south
players. We believe the cement stock performance for the period ahead would be influenced by (i) new capacity additions (ii) prospects for
local demand as a result of cut in PSDP, slowdown in construction activities for real estate projects and CPEC related projects.
AAH Cement Universe is trading at a FY19E market-weighted average P/E of 12.86x where EV/ton stands at USD 61 (based on closing prices
of 8th Oct’18), where our top picks are LUCK & DGKC. The scrips are currently trading at FY19E P/E of 16.42x/6.9x along with dividend yield
of 2%/5.8% respectively. Pioneer Cement and Kohat Cement are our preferred pick. PIOC trades at FY19E P/E of 8.17x and EV/ton of USD99,
whereas KOHC trades at a P/E of 7.30x and EV/ton of USD37.
Cement Sector
Table of Contents
Introduction …………………………………………………………….……04
Local Cement Demand Outlook………..…………………………..05
Export Demand Outlook………………………………………………..11
Supply Analysis………………………….…………………………………..18
Scenario Analysis…………………………..…..……………………….… 22
Outlook on Input Cost……………………………………………….……24
Outlook on Cement Prices …..……………………………………..…28
AAH Cement Universe
Lucky Cement …………………………………………………………..…...31
DG Khan Cement ……………………………………… …………….…….35
Kohat Cement ……………………………..…………………..…….….....38
Pioneer Cement………………………………………………..…………….41
Fauji Cement ……………….…………………………….…………….……..44
Cherat Cement …………….………………………….………………….…..47
Attock Cement ………….……………………………………….……….…..50
Introduction to Pakistan’s Cement Industry Introduction
LOGISTICS
75.22mn tons. The industry consists of 17 cement players which operate in two 50 Supply
Supply
separate regions namely South and North with the Northern region representing 25
Analysis
Analysis
~74% of total installed capacity and south representing 26% of total capacity.
-
Besides this the industry has a great potential to tap the exports market as well
May-…
Jul-18
Apr-18
Jun-18
Aug-17
Nov-17
Sep-17
Dec-17
Jan-18
Feb-18
Mar-18
Aug-18
Sep-18
Oct-17
with the Players in the South region being the main beneficiaries due to port Rising
Rising
advantage. However, the export potential for manufacturers in the North region is input
inputcost
cost
limited to Afghanistan and India only. Source: AAH Research
Capacity additions by FY21
Since Pakistan’s entry into MSCI EM, the sector has shed its value by ~47% mainly Outlook on
75.22
concerned by 1) disruptions in marketing arrangement 2) higher input cost coupled 14.28 4.15
with pricing pressure which has eroded sector’s margins by 10pps in FY18 3) Cement prices
7.34
expected slowdown in demand ahead of possible entrance in IMF program 4) 47.35 2.11
excess supply to keep the prices low in the regions (North and South) and 5)
immense selling of foreign investors in the sector. AAH Cement
Universe
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Regional
Industry
Source: AAH Research 4
Comparison
Multiples
Factors affecting cement demand Introduction
LOGISTICS
1,800
100,000 Rising
1,600
1,553 1,500 - input cost
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19E
1,400
1,200 Source: AAH Research
1,000
950 Outlook on
863 Local cement dispatches have benefited from the growth in PSDP
800 Cement prices
650 expenditure (12-year correlation stands at 0.97). This time around,
600 476 450 we raise our concerns on the sector outlook for FY19, where the
327
400 298
225 new Govt. has already announced a cut in PSDP allocation of PKR
200
194 184
120 125bn to PKR675bn. From FY19 onwards, we expect cement AAH Cement
- demand to continue its pace on account of government’s plan to Universe
Indonesia
India
Saudi Arabia
Bangladesh
Turkey
Brazil
USA
China
Vietnam
Russia
Thailand
Iran
Pakistan
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
Industry
6
Multiples
Source: SBP & AAH Research
But now the question arises, growth in local
Introduction
dispatches would continue or not?
Macro-economic concerns to slowdown local demand in the
current fiscal year Local Demand
Outlook
At present, Pakistan is surrounded by major economic concerns including rising Facility
Date of Expiration
current account deficit (PKR18bn in FY18), depleting foreign exchange reserves and Arrangement Date Export Demand
large import bill that has created the possibility of approaching IMF as a last resort. Extended Fund Facility Sep 04, 2013 Sep 30, 2016 Outlook
Recall that Pakistan has frequently approached IMF for standby loans, adjustment Standby Arrangement Nov 24, 2008 Sep 30, 2011
facility (adjustment lending) and Economic stabilization packages in the past. Since Extended Credit Facility Dec 06, 2001 Dec 05, 2004
these loans are accompanied by a structural package, therefore, it compels Pakistan Standby Arrangement Nov 29, 2000 Sep 30, 2001 Supply
to meet certain targets for economic stabilization. Pakistan has joined IMF on July Extended Credit Facility Oct 20, 1997 Oct 19, 2000 Analysis
11, 1950. However, the Fund extended its first standby loan to Pakistan in 1958. Extended Fund Facility Oct 20, 1997 Oct 19, 2000
Since FY94, Pakistan has entered into nine different agreements with IMF, where Standby Arrangement Dec 13, 1995 Sep 30, 1997
the stabilization program calls for tightening of monetary and fiscal policy to bring Extended Credit Facility Feb 22, 1994 Dec 13, 1995 Rising
down inflation and to strengthen external position. Extended Fund Facility Feb 22, 1994 Dec 04, 1995 input cost
Standby Arrangement Sep 16, 1993 Feb 22, 1994
We highlight the risk of approaching to IMF if the government would not be able to Structural Adj Facility Dec 28, 1988 Dec 27, 1991
cater the economic concerns. It is expected that the objectives of the program will
Standby Arrangement Dec 28, 1988 Nov 30, 1990 Outlook on
going to be consistent with the earlier program, which would include reducing the
Extended Fund Facility Dec 02, 1981 Nov 23, 1983
budget deficit, bringing down public expenditures, increasing Foreign exchange Cement prices
Extended Fund Facility Nov 24, 1980 Dec 01, 1981
reserves, reducing external debt, controlling inflation, reducing domestic borrowing
Standby Arrangement Mar 09, 1977 Mar 08, 1978
for budgetary support and currency devaluation. The combined impact of these
Standby Arrangement Nov 11, 1974 Nov 10, 1975
measures would discourage aggregate demand, in our view. We highlight that the AAH Cement
effect of unstable macro-economic concerns has started showing off in the shape of Standby Arrangement Aug 11, 1973 Aug 10, 1974
Standby Arrangement May 18, 1972 May 17, 1973
Universe
cut in development expenditures by PKR125bn to curtail growing budget deficit.
Standby Arrangement Oct 17, 1968 Oct 16, 1969
Standby Arrangement Mar 16, 1965 Mar 15, 1966
Standby Arrangement Dec 08, 1958 Sep 22, 1959 Industry
Source: IMF and AAH Research Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Large current account deficits pushed BOP Depleting FX reserves created pressure on PKR
USD bn
Export Demand
10
Current account balance USD mn Deteriorating twin deficit put
Outlook
25,000
enormous pressure on FX reserves.
15,000
-5 Rising
10,000
input cost
-10
5,000 Outlook on
-15
Cement prices
0
-20
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
AAH Cement
Universe
Source: SBP and AAH Research Source: SBP and AAH Research
The deteriorating economic situation has created the high possibility of Industry
approaching IMF. Multiples
Investment case Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY17
FY18
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
coupled with average GDP growth of 5%; which translates into an
expected growth in cement demand of 5.5% (GDP multiplier: 1.10x) over input cost
FY20-23F. Source: AAH Research
Multiplier
25% GDP Growth Local dispatches GDP Mulitiplier (RHS) 10 Outlook on
20% 5 Cement prices
15% 0
10% -5
5% -10
0% -15 AAH Cement
-5% -20 Universe
-10% -25
-15% -30
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Industry
10
Multiples
Source: AAH Research
Exports Introduction
LOGISTICS
Pakistan cement industry has witnessed a continuous steep decline in export Pakistan’s export dispatches (mn tons)
dispatches for the past 7 consecutive years with a CAGR of -10%. The continuous Mn tons
Export Demand
decline in exports dispatches could be attributable to several factors such as a) 12
10.65
Outlook
imposition of anti-dumping duties by different countries b) influx of Iranian 10.66
10 9.43
cement in Afghanistan c) PKR overvaluation that resulted in lack of 8.57 8.37
8.14
competitiveness in export region and d) Higher margins in local market. 8
7.72
7.19 Supply
5.87 Analysis
Amid availability of surplus capacity on account of upcoming capacity additions, 6
4.66 4.75
PKR devaluation has created a room for the local players to search for new 4 3.23
avenues in export market. To highlight, this is not the first time that the cement Rising
companies would explore new avenues for the export. History foretells that 2 input cost
export dispatches have gained momentum whenever the industry has
-
experienced a turnaround of the expansionary cycle. Similarly, we have seen
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
export dispatches witnessing a meager growth of 2% in FY18 which is mainly
Outlook on
contributed by the south players accompanied by post-expansion of ACPL & Source: APCMA & AAH Research
LUCK. Moreover, we present some regions where the opportunity for export Cement prices
exists for cement players.
AAH Cement
Universe
Industry
11
Multiples
Exports to be the rescuer for the cement players Introduction
LOGISTICS
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Source: Central Statistical Organization of Afghanistan
12
Multiples
Exports to be the rescuer for the cement players Introduction
LOGISTICS
AAH Cement
Universe
Industry
Source: Cemnet 14
Multiples
Exports to be the rescuer for the cement players Introduction
LOGISTICS
Despite adding such a hefty capacity from the local players coupled with the Supply
availability of abundant limestone reserves, (According to the Indian Bureau of Analysis
mines, total resources of limestone stands at ~203bn tonnes, of which ~16.33bn
tonnes (8.03%) are available under reserve category), some parts of the country
rely on imports, as most of the integrated plants are either located in the south, Rising
east or central regions of the country. Whereas, the north region which mainly
comprises of grinding units has limited availability of limestone (except Rajasthan,
input cost
which has large limestone reserves in the region owns integrated plants), requires
clinker to produce cement and thus high transportation cost from other regions
makes import more feasible from Pak-Iran border. Outlook on
Mn tons Imports Pak's share in total imports Mn tons Cement prices
200.0 174.4
3.7
139.8 3.2
150.0
110.3 104.2 2.7
100.0
92.5 91.9 2.2 AAH Cement
68.3 1.7
50.0 0.70
0.99 1.25 1.21
1.2
Universe
0.61 0.48 0.68
0.7
0.0 0.2
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
Source: Cemnet
Industry
Source: IBF & AAH Research
15
Multiples
Exports to be the rescuer for the cement players Introduction
LOGISTICS
Outlook on
Cement prices
AAH Cement
Universe
Industry
Source: Cemnet 16
Multiples
Investment thesis Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY17
FY18
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
country but also help in maintaining the high utilization level which would lessen
the probability of pricing pressure in the country. Source: AAH Research
input cost
Our investment case assumed exports to show a meagre growth of 3% in FY19 Pakistan’s export share
(2% growth witnessed during FY18). However, from FY20, we expect cement Mn tons Others AFghanistan India Outlook on
7.00
exports to pick up on account of above mentioned opportunities. Remaining Cement prices
6.00
conservative, we have assumed exports to grow at a CAGR of 4% during FY20-23.
5.00
4.00
AAH Cement
3.00
2.00
Universe
1.00
-
Industry
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
17
Multiples
Source: APCMA & AAH Research
Third Expansionary Cycle Ahead Introduction
LOGISTICS
46
39 40 Outlook on
34 34 35
30 31 31 33 33 Cement prices
24
19
16
14
11 AAH Cement
Universe
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
Industry
18
Multiples
Source: APCMA & AAH Research
Third Expansionary Cycle Ahead Introduction
LOGISTICS
Local Demand
Outlook
Since demand is not likely to increase with the same pace as supply, utilization level for the industry would decline as a result of capacity
additions which would create pricing pressure, leading to lower profitability and hence a decline in return profiles. Same trend is Export Demand
expected to continue
Increase in utilization level led
going forward on the Outlook
companies to earn better return
Industry Capacity utilization Average ROE EBITDA/ton back of increase in
pricing pressure.
Supply
20% 27% 24% 23% 24%
20% Decline in utilization level 2,568 Analysis
11% 17% 10% 16% 12% 15%
6% resulted in the decline of 2,324
16% companies return profile, as
2% 93% pricing pressure increased. 2,110
-1% Rising
85% 87% 84% 1,872 1,883
80% 78%
77% 78% 1,721 1,724 input cost
74% 75% 74% 73% 75% 74% 1,697
70% 70%
1,398 1,487
1,334
1,213
Outlook on
940
Cement prices
673
478
394
AAH Cement
Universe
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
Industry
19
Multiples
Source: APCMA & AAH Research
Supply Analysis Introduction
LOGISTICS
resulted into lower profitability and hence a decline in return profiles. 8.0 70%
Supply
6.0 59%
4.0
59% 60% Analysis
To recall, the industry experienced its first expansionary cycle during the 2.0
50%
period of 1995-1999 where the industry added a total of 7.36mn tons of - 40%
capacity. Resultantly, the utilization level dropped by 30% from its peak of Rising
FY91
FY92
FY93
FY94
FY95
FY96
FY97
FY98
FY99
90% and settled at around 60%. input cost
Source: APCMA & AAH Research
The industry witnessed it second expansionary cycle during the period of
Industry’s second expansionary cycle
2005-10, where initially the capacity enhanced by 20mn tons from
Mn tons Capacity Dispatches Utilization Outlook on
17.91mn tons to 37.68mn tons over 2005-08. Subsequently, the capacity 45.34
100%
additions outran the volume growth leading to a decline in utilization
45.0 91%
89% 37.68
42.28 Cement prices
40.0 90%
30.50
levels. Correspondingly, the industry experienced its first cut in prices 35.0 79%
80% 80% 80%
30.0 74%
from its peak of PK296/bag to PKR243/bag (a drop of PKR53/bag) and a 25.0 20.83
75%
70%
declined in utilization level from 91% to 80%. Furthermore, during the 20.0 17.28 17.91 AAH Cement
60%
second phase (2008-10) an addition of 7.66mn tons led the industry’s 15.0
Universe
10.0
capacity to increase to 45.34mn tons followed by a further declined in 5.0
50%
cement prices by PKR 64/bag thus resulting in a utilization level of 75%. - 40%
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
Industry
20
Multiples
Source: APCMA & AAH Research
Supply Analysis Introduction
LOGISTICS
South Region FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Outlook on
ACPL Attock Cement (Pakistan) Limited 1.83 1.83 1.83 2.46 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.09 ACPL’s Line IiI of 1.26mn tons has commenced its Cement prices
operation from 3QFY18.
DCL Dewan Cement Limited 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95
LUCK’s Line II of 1.30mn tons has commenced its
LUCK Lucky Cement Limited 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.40 5.05 5.05 5.05 5.05 5.05 5.05 operation from 3QFY18.
POWER Power Cement Limited /Al Abbas 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.56 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 POWER new line of 2.40mn tons is expected
in 4QFY19
AAH Cement
THCCL Thatta Cement Company Limited 0.47 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54
DGKC D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited - - - - 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 DGKC’s Line of 2.84mn tons has commenced its Universe
operation from 1QFY19.
Total South Region Capacity 8.95 9.01 9.02 10.30 15.02 16.84 16.84 16.84 16.84 16.84
Total Capacity 44.46 46.51 47.35 49.46 56.80 71.07 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 Industry
Source: APCMA & AAH Research Multiples
*All the figures are in mn tons
Investment Thesis Introduction
LOGISTICS
Based on the last cement upcycle, we believe the improvement in cement companies’ return profiles would be contingent upon
utilization levels. As the industry touches utilization levels of 80%, cement players’ pricing power will improve. We performed a scenario Export Demand
analysis to determine a timeline when the demand-supply scenario would become favorable for the cement sector (80-85% utilization). Outlook
As mentioned earlier, in our base case, we have assumed 5.5% CAGR volume growth in local dispatches and 4% CAGR volume growth in
export dispatches. Supply
Analysis
Refer Annexure 3 for worst case and best case scenarios.
Demand/Supply Analysis FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19F FY20F FY21F FY22F FY23F FY24F FY25F Rising
Total Capacity 45.62 46.39 49.46 56.80 71.07 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 input cost
Total Demand (CAGR: 5.4%) 38.87 40.32 45.89 47.52 50.06 52.73 55.56 58.53 61.66 64.96
Outlook on
Total Utilization 85% 87% 93% 84% 70% 70% 74% 78% 82% 86%
Cement prices
Local Demand (CAGR: 5.5%) 33.00 35.65 41.15 42.63 44.97 47.45 50.06 52.81 55.71 58.78
Demend Growth 17.0% 8.0% 15.4% 3.6% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% AAH Cement
Universe
Export demand (CAGR: 4.0%) 5.87 4.66 4.75 4.89 5.09 5.29 5.50 5.72 5.95 6.19
Demend Growth -18.4% -20.6% 1.8% 3.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Source: AAH Research Industry
22
Multiples
Scenario Analysis Introduction
LOGISTICS
Export Demand
Annexure. 3
Outlook
Demand/Supply Analysis FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19F FY20F FY21F FY22F FY23F FY24F FY25F FY26F FY27F FY28F
Total Capacity 46.51 47.35 49.46 56.80 71.07 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22 75.22
Supply
Total Demand (CAGR: 7%) 38.87 40.32 45.89 48.9 52.1 55.4 59.0 62.9 67.0 71.3 76.0 80.9 86.1
Best case Total Utilization 84% 85% 93% 86% 73% 74% 78% 84% 89% 95% 101% 108% 115% Analysis
Base case Total Demand (CAGR: 5.4%) 38.87 40.32 45.89 47.5 50.1 52.7 55.6 58.5 61.7 65.0 68.5 72.2 76.1
Total Utilization 84% 85% 93% 84% 70% 70% 74% 78% 82% 86% 91% 96% 101% Rising
input cost
Worst case Total Demand (CAGR: 3%) 38.87 40.32 45.89 47.3 48.7 50.1 51.7 53.2 54.8 56.4 58.1 59.9 61.7
Total Utilization 84% 85% 93% 83% 69% 67% 69% 71% 73% 75% 77% 80% 82%
Source: AAH Research Outlook on
In best case, Optimum utilization Cement prices
level expected to reach by FY22-23
In base case, Optimum utilization
level expected to reach by FY24-25 AAH Cement
In worst case, Optimum utilization Universe
level expected to reach by FY27-28
Industry
23
Multiples
Lower retention prices amid high input cost to
Introduction
LOGISTICS
dent sector’s profitability
Rising coal prices continue to hurt margins Local Demand
Outlook
Coal remains the backbone of the cement industry as it accounts for ~40-45% in total Richard’s Bay Coal prices
cost mix. Global commodity prices have been on a bull run since the start of FY18 and Per tonne
120 108 106
in the same way prices of coal have been increasing that has led to the depressed 100 95 Export Demand
margins for the cement players. Coal prices have been gradually gaining their strength 100 93 90
(35% up since the start of FY18) on account of strong Asian demand coupled with 76
85
77 77 Outlook
80 65
tight supplies (due to recent environmental wave in China that has led closure of coal 53
mines in the country). 60
However, recent price correction of 10% has been witnessed in coal prices on account 40 Supply
of lower demand from China driven by monsoon season. Moreover, we highlight the 20 Analysis
risk of coal prices to revert back given trade war between the US & China as Beijing
might hit US LNG imports with 25% duty for equivalent retaliation ahead of winter 0
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19F
FY20F
FY21F
season. However, China has reduced the tariffs to 10% on US products which were
initially planned as 25%. To highlight, Washington has also reduced the tariffs to 10% Rising
for Chinese products. Therefore, in the wake of the above mentioned factors we Source: SBP & AAH Research input cost
continue to keep our FY19/20/21 international coal prices forecast at USD100/95/90
per ton respectively. Hence, we provide the impact of USD5/ton change in coal prices
on AAH Cement universe FY19 earnings.
Annexure. 4 Earnings sensitivity to changes in coal prices Outlook on
FY19 Base Cement prices
Companies USD90/ton USD95/ton USD100/ton USD105/ton USD110/ton
LUCK 31.05 29.75 28.45 27.14 25.84
DGKC 14.04 13.17 12.30 11.44 10.57 AAH Cement
ACPL 15.28 13.76 12.23 10.70 9.17 Universe
CHCC 11.60 10.69 9.78 8.86 7.95
PIOC 5.72 5.30 4.88 4.46 4.04
KOHC 17.52 16.63 15.73 14.84 13.94
FCCL 2.03 1.88 1.74 1.59 1.44
Industry
24
Multiples
Source: Company Accounts & AAH Research
Currency depreciation remains another risk Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19E
FY20F
FY21F
FY22F
FY23F
Imposition of additional duties and taxes on local cement will adversely impact
on the profitability
input cost
Source: SBP & AAH Research
In FY19 Budget the government has announced a further increase in FED by 1,500
PKR0.25/kg, taking total FED to increase up to PKR1.5/kg. However, the pricing
1,600 FED per ton Outlook on
1,400 1,500
power of the sector led the players to ultimately pass this impact of increased 1,200 1,250 Cement prices
cost to the consumers. Nevertheless, considering a scenario of limited pricing 1,000 1,000
power and unfavorable supply-demand dynamics, any more cost pressures (as 800
the companies would not be in a position to pass on the impact) will adversely 600
… 400 400
AAH Cement
400 400
impact the profitability of cement players. Universe
200
-
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
Industry
Source: AAH Research 25
Multiples
Lower retention prices amid high input cost to
Introduction
dent sector’s profitability LOGISTICS
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19E
FY20E
Rising
Source: SBP & AAH Research input cost
Annexure. 5 Earnings sensitivity to changes in interest rates
FY19 Base 30% Total Debt to Asset Long term to asset
25%
Outlook on
Companies 6.5% 7.5% 8.6% 9.5% 10.5% 25% 22% Cement prices
DGKC 12.30 12.43 12.30 12.18 12.05 20%
20%
16% 16%
ACPL 12.73 12.48 12.23 11.97 11.72
15%
CHCC 10.12 9.95 9.78 9.62 9.45 AAH Cement
10% 8%
PIOC 4.91 4.89 4.88 4.86 4.85 Universe
KOHC 15.76 15.74 15.73 15.72 15.71 5%
FY17
FY18
FY19
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research Industry
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
26
Multiples
Outlook on Cement prices Introduction
LOGISTICS
On the contrary, cement prices started to improve from 1st July 2017 in order to pass on the impact of an increase in FED that was Supply
announced in the budget FY18. However, in the wake of scheduled capacity additions, the disruption in the marketing arrangement has Analysis
resulted in the failure of price sustainability in the North region which reached a low of PKR502/bag.
620
North Region South Region Prices in the South region Rising
600 remained stable input cost
580
560
540
Outlook on
520
Cement prices
500
Cement prices declined in North post commissioning of Cement prices started to gain its momentum from 1st
480
CHCC’s 1.3mn tons of expansion in Jan 2017. Prices July’18 to pass on the impact of increased FED cost, AAH Cement
460 went down from an avg PKR543/bag to PKR524/bag however, the region failed to sustained its momentum Universe
from jan’17 to May’17. due to disruption in the marketing arrangement.
440
Jul'16
Nov'16
Apr'17
Jul'17
Nov'17
Apr'18
Oct'16
Mar'17
May'17
Oct'17
Mar'18
May'18
Sep'16
Dec'16
Feb'17
Sep'17
Dec'17
Feb'18
June'18
Aug'16
Jan'17
Jun'17
Aug'17
Jan'18
Industry
27
Multiples
Source: PBS & AAH Research
Outlook on Cement prices Introduction
LOGISTICS
- -
Industry
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
28
Multiples
Source: PBS & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
- Industry
2-Oct-17 2-Dec-17 2-Feb-18 2-Apr-18 2-Jun-18 2-Aug-18 2-Oct-18
31
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Taking into account all above-mentioned businesses, LUCK is expected to bode AAH Cement
well in the long run, however, in the short-run margins are expected to shrink on Universe
the back of uncertainty of marketing arrangement among cement players coupled
with rising coal prices. We see earnings to increase with a CAGR of 5% from FY19-
24. Hence, we have a BUY call on the scrip with Jun-19 TP of PKR571/sh. Industry
33
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Key upside to our investment case are i) early commencement of new line that
results in higher dispatches growth ii) higher than estimated increase in cement Supply
prices iii) higher than the estimated decrease in input prices. Analysis
Valuation snapshot PKR/Sh Share in TP
Rising
Cement 319 56%
Lucky Electric power 60 10% input cost
ICI 103 18%
Iraq mill 41 7%
Outlook on
DR Congo plant 28 5%
Cement prices
NutriCo Pakistan 14 2%
Yunus Energy 6 1%
KIA motors* 42 - AAH Cement
Universe
Target Price 571
*Not incorporated in TP
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Industry
34
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY18
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
A
Industry
35
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Industry
37
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY16A
FY17E
FY18E
FY19E
FY20E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
-2%
Industry
38
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Industry
40
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
Industry
41
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
mill) and discounts offered by the company were the main reason behind the decline 90.0
in PIOC’s profitability in FY18. Moreover, an obstacle in capacity addition due to katas 70.0 AAH Cement
raj issue had created difficulty for the company as well. 50.0 Universe
30.0
10.0
4-Oct-17 4-Jan-18 4-Apr-18 4-Jul-18 4-Oct-18 Industry
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research 42
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Industry
43
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
ROE
10% ROA 9%
28% 8% 8% Market share Outlook on
30%
8% 6.1% 6.5%
25% 22% 6% 6%
5.6% Cement prices
19%
20% 16% 6% 5%
12% 4% 4%
3.5% 3.5% 3.4% 3.7%
15% 10% 4%
10%
3% AAH Cement
2% 2% Universe
5%
0% 0% 0%
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
Industry
44
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FCCL KSE
160 Outlook on
In the wake of rising coal prices, the company has decided to improve operational
efficiencies by installing a solar power plant (expected to meet 12%/17% power
140 Cement prices
120
requirement in FY20/21) which would further reduce its dependence on the national
100
grid after the installation of 9MW WHR on line II. The above-mentioned measure is
likely to improve gross margins by a meager 1.7pps/2pps during FY20/21 to 23%/25% 80 AAH Cement
respectively. 60 Universe
40
20
- Industry
4-Oct-17 4-Jan-18 4-Apr-18 4-Jul-18 4-Oct-18 45
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Industry
46
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
Rising
input cost
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY17A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Industry
47
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
20
31-Aug-17 31-Oct-17 31-Dec-17 28-Feb-18 30-Apr-18 30-Jun-18 Industry
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research 48
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Industry
49
Multiples
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
Industry
50
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
Key upside to our investment case are i) higher than estimated increase in cement
prices iii) higher than the estimated decrease in energy cost. iv) strong local demand Industry
52
Multiples
v) better than expected earnings from Iraq project.
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Rising
input cost
25% ROA
35%
ROE 10% Market share
30%
20%
Outlook on
30% 8%
25% 17% 6.2% 6.0%
5.7% 5.6% 5.3%
Cement prices
15%
6% 5.1% 5.2% 5.4%
20% 15% 16% 11% 12%
12% 13% 10% 9%
15% 4%
10%
9%
5%
AAH Cement
5% 7%
5% 2% Universe
0% 0%
0%
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY18A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
FY16A
FY17A
FY18A
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
FY23E
Industry
53
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
FCCL
DGKC
PIOC
ACPL
LUCK
KOHC
LUCK
CHCC
DGKC
ACPL
FCCL
PIOC
KOHC
Rising
input cost
18.0 P/E 16.4 35% Gross margins
16.0 30%
14.0
30% 27% Outlook on
11.8
12.0 25% 22% 23% Cement prices
8.7 19% 20%
10.0 8.2 20% 18%
8.0 7.0 7.3 6.9
15%
6.0
10%
AAH Cement
4.0
2.0 5%
Universe
-
0%
FCCL
KOHC
ACPL
CHCC
LUCK
PIOC
DGKC
CHCC
FCCL
PIOC
DGKC
ACPL
LUCK
KOHC
Industry
54
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Introduction
LOGISTICS
CHCC
FCCL
KOHC
ACPL
DGKC
LUCK
FCCL
KOHC
ACPL
LUCK
PIOC
CHCC
DGKC
Rising
input cost
9% ROA 8% 8% ROE
8% 16%
8% 14%
7%
14% 12% Outlook on
6%
12%
10% 10%
11%
Cement prices
5% 5% 10% 9%
5% 5%
4% 8% 7%
3% 3% 6% AAH Cement
2% 4% Universe
1% 2%
0% 0%
FCCL
ACPL
KOHC
PIOC
CHCC
LUCK
DGKC
FCCL
KOHC
ACPL
PIOC
LUCK
CHCC
DGKC
Industry
55
Multiples
Source: Company accounts & AAH Research
Aba Ali Habib Securities
Registered Office: Room # 419, 419 A & 421, 4th Floor, Pakistan Stock Exchange, I.I. Chundrigarh Road, Karachi.
Contact: 32429665, Cell: +92 3313219274, +92 3212484950
URL: www.abaalihabib.com
DEFINITION OF RATINGS
Ratings Expected absolute returns over 12 months
ANALYST DISCLOSURES
1. The analyst(s) declares that neither he/ his relatives have a Beneficial or Actual ownership of > 1% of equity of subject company/companies
2. The analyst(s) declares that he has no material conflict of interest with the subject company/ companies of this report
Disclaimer
This report has been prepared by Aba Ali Habib Securities and is provided for information purposes only. Under no circumstances this is to be used or considered as an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy. While reasonable
care has been taken to ensure that the information contained therein is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, we make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. From
time to time, Aba Ali Habib Securities and/or any of its officers or directors may, as permitted by applicable laws, have a position, or otherwise be interested in any transaction, in any securities directly or indirectly subject of this
report. This report is provided only for the information of professional advisers who are expected to make their own investment decisions without undue reliance on this report. Investments in capital markets are subject to market risk
and Aba Ali Habib Securities accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.
In particular, the report takes no account of the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of investors, who should seek further professional advice or rely upon their own judgment and acumen before making any
investment. The views expressed in this report are those of Aba Ali Habib Securities’ Research Department and do not necessarily reflect those of the company or its directors. Aba Ali Habib as a firm may have business relationships,
including investment- banking relationships, with the companies referred to in this report. Aba Ali Habib Securities or any of its officers, directors, principals, employees, associates, close relatives may act as a market maker in the
securities of the subject company, may have a financial interest in the securities of the subject company to an amount exceeding 1% of the value of the securities of the subject company, may serve or may have served in the past as a
director or officer of the subject company, may have received compensation from the subject company for corporate advisory services, brokerage services or underwriting services or may expect to receive or intend to seek
compensation from the subject company for the aforesaid services, may have managed or co-managed a public offering, take-over, buyback, delisting offer of securities or various other functions for the subject company.
All rights reserved by Aba Ali Habib Securities. This report or any portion hereof may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose whatsoever. Nor can it be sent to a third party without prior consent of
Aba Ali Habib Securities. Action could be taken for unauthorized reproduction, distribution or publication.
Dissemination Policy
Aba Ali Habib Securities endeavors to make all reasonable efforts to disseminate its publication to all eligible clients in a timely manner through either physical or electronic distribution such as mail, fax and/or email. Nevertheless, not
all clients may receive the material at the same time.
Valuation Methodology
To arrive at our 12-months Price Target, ABA Ali Habib Research uses different valuation methods which include: 1). DCF methodology, 2). Relative valuation methodology, and 3). Asset-based valuation methodology. In this report, our
PT is founded on FCFF based DCF methodology.
Analyst Certification AC
The research Analyst(s) hereby certify that the views about the company/companies and the security/securities discussed in this report accurately reflect his or her or their personal views and that s/he has not received and will not
receive direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing specific recommendation or views in this report. The analyst(s) is/are principally responsible for preparation of this research report and that s/he or his/her close
relative/family member doesn’t own 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of the following company/companies covered in this report.