Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Institutional Audit is the new QAA process which will test the quality of our courses of
study; the standards of our awards and our internal procedures for securing quality
and standards. Institutional Audit is a form of evidence-based peer review which is
student-centred. IA will focus on the quality and transparency of information provided
to students; the ways in which their learning is facilitated and supported, and the
academic standards they are expected to achieve, and achieve in practice.
Institutional Audit combines scrutiny of internal QA systems at institutional level with
investigations into the operation of those systems in departments.
IA will take place e very 6 years. The QAA will make brief progress visits at the 3 year
mid-point between Audits. Warwick will undergo its first IA in the first week of March
2004. A briefing visit of 3 days duration will take place 5 weeks in advance. The
briefing visit is a fundamental part of the IA process and will, to a large extent,
determine the programme for, and lines of enquiry to be followed during, the Audit
visit. Details of the schedule for Warwick’s IA are provided in a separate paper.
The QAA states that the aims of the IA process are to meet the public interest in
knowing that HEIs are:
(d) To ensure that students, employers and others can have ready access to
easily comprehensible, meaningful and reliable public information about the
extent to which HEIs are offering courses which meet national expectations in
respect of standards and quality.
(e) To ensure that the process ensures rapid remedial action in the event that
courses or standards are found to be weak or deficient.
1
(c) Examples of Warwick’s internal QA processes at work in departments (DATs)
and across the University (Thematic Enquiries) to demonstrate the validity
and reliability of the information generated by 4(a).
(a) The processes and outcomes of Annual Course Review and Periodic Review.
(b) The use made of external reference points; the Code of Practice; the
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications and Subject Benchmark
Statements. (A separate paper has been provided in this pack on these
external reference points.)
(h) The quality assurance of teaching staff, including the University’s appointment
criteria and the ways in which teaching effectiveness is appraised, improved
and rewarded.
(g) Oral and written information acquired during the Briefing and Audit Visits.
7. Judgements
The QAA will publish a formal report on the Institutional Audit of the University
addressing:
2
(a) The confidence which can be placed in the soundness of Warwick's present
and likely future management of the quality of its courses and the standards
of its awards.
(b) The reliance which can be placed on the accuracy, completeness and
frankness of information published by the University about its courses and
standards.