Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Lynn Wilcox
SLM 501
22 Apr. 2018
Accountability and reflective practice are two essential requirements for educators in the
21st Century. During uncertain budget times, the role of a media specialist and the
implementation of a successful library program are often subject to scrutiny by policymakers and
elected officials. In order to defend the importance of the media specialist and the school library,
evidence must be collected to demonstrate the integral role library programs have to promote
Reflection and evaluation tools utilized in the general education classroom do not
encompass the complexity of the librarian roles and measure the success of a school library
entitled A Planning Guide for Empowering Learners. Within the guide, librarians will find an
assessment rubric designed to “serve as a guide for formative assessment of school library
programs” (AASL 48). The distinguishing component of the rubric is the cycle framework which
encourages library media specialists to view the process as a “continuous improvement cycle”
(AASL 48). According to Figure 1 in the A Planning Guide for Empowering Learners, the cycle
features five stages including “collect, compare, identify, develop, and implement” (AASL 48).
First, librarians “collect data” and “analyze” the data using the assessment rubric. (AASL 48).
Next, librarians will review the rubric and attempt to “identify goals” and “develop [an] action
Wilcox 2
plan” (AASL 48). Once the action plan has been created, the librarian will work to put the plan
into practice. Through the use of the assessment rubric, librarians will be able to assess their
library program by reviewing four different sections. The assessment rubric sections include
“developing visions for learning, teaching for learning, building the learning environment, and
empowering learning through leadership” (AASL 49-65). By analyzing the rubric results, the
librarian can determine strengths and weakness for how he or she is performing the various roles
of a school library media specialist as defined by the American Association of School Librarians.
While aligning with best practices and guidelines from the AASL, the Maryland State
Department has created their own standards for school library media programs. In a document
entitled, “School Library Programs in Maryland,” media specialists must document and provide
concrete examples to support each standard. The standards evaluated include mission, goals and
objectives, instruction, staffing, resources and resource services, facilities, and program
evaluation. The scoring system is simplistic with four levels including implemented, working
toward, not started, and not applicable. For each standard, media specialists collect examples for
documentation, score and self-assess, and establish targets designed to help develop short and
long range goals. “School Library Programs in Maryland” differs from the A Planning Guide for
Empowering Learners rubric because of the simplicity and checklist format. If a librarian
requires a detailed analysis, A Planning Guide for Empowering Learners assessment rubric
document is a reflective tool that might be utilized annually or at the beginning and end of a
school year.
become a familiar tool for evaluating the performance of educators in the 21st Century. While the
Wilcox 3
Danielson framework includes many of the job responsibilities and descriptors of school
librarians, the AASL’s Learning 4 Life: Sample School Librarian Performance and Evaluation
System aligns the four domains with standards established by the American Association of
School Librarians. The four domains include “Planning and Preparation, The Library
are scored utilizing a four step scale including distinguished, proficient, basic, and unsatisfactory.
There are various components for each of the four domains. In addition to receiving a score for
every component, the librarian is provided with an overall score for the domain.
The first domain relates to planning and preparation within the school library program.
The components within Domain 1 measure the knowledge of the curriculum, the process used to
connect the curriculum, knowledge of students with respect to ability levels and diversity. In
addition, Domain 1 includes how the librarian seeks to reach instructional goals, uses resources
to search and access information, promotes an environment of literacy, and collaborates with
teachers to plan and deliver instruction. A primary focus of Domain 1 is to measure the skill
Domain 2 differs from the traditional Charlotte Danielson model because the focus
relates to the overall library environment in comparison to the general classroom setting. The
tool measure components including the interactions of the librarian with stakeholder, the overall
learning environment, how the library is organized with respect to circulation and scheduling
policies and procedures, student behavior expectations, accessibility and navigating through the
library space. Many of the components relate to the visibility and overall appearance of the
school library facility and whether the space is conducive to student learning.
Wilcox 4
The third domain relates to the instruction provided by the library media specialist.
encouraging higher order thinking and student directed inquiry, promoting an environment that is
rigorous for student growth, utilizing a variety of formative and summative assessments to
monitor student progress. Each section of Domain 3 directly relates to how skilled and effective
The final domain of the L4L System measures a media specialist’s overall commitment to
reflection and improvement. Components of the domain include the vision, mission, and
librarian’s ability to reflect upon his or her practice. Administrative tasks including record
keeping, advocacy for the program also are featured in Domain 4. School librarians are also
expected to share their role in the school and district level community, activities completed to
grow as a professional, how the collection is maintained and developed, managing the budget
and personnel, and maintaining a code of ethics. In comparison to the other domains, the focus of
Domain 4 measures how effectively the media specialist administers the library program.
While there are advantages and disadvantages to the A Planning Guide for Empowering
Learners with School Library Program Assessment Rubric and the AASL’s Learning 4 Life:
Sample School Librarian Performance and Evaluation System, both tools are indispensable to
new and seasoned librarians. Reflective practitioners are experts with data collection, analysis,
and establishing target goals for improvement. While the Empowering Learners Assessment
Rubric has clearly defined descriptors, there are certain elements that are beyond the control of
an exemplary librarian. The L4L System provides feedback and creates a sense of urgency
however, evaluators should utilize caution when using the tool to avoid showing subjectivity or
using the framework as a checklist. By effectively using the tools, librarians are able to build a
Wilcox 5
program to support the curriculum and student achievement and advocate for the materials and
Part Two: Interview with Mentor Librarian using A Planning Guide for Empowering
Learners with School Library Program Assessment Rubric
Part Three: Interview with Mentor Librarian using L4L Sample School Librarian
Performance and Evaluation System
Overall score: 3
Wilcox 11
Part Four: Analysis of the Mentor Librarian’s Leadership and the Overall Program
Mentor Librarian has been with the Washington County Public School system for 22
years. She is the lead elementary media specialist. Her dynamic personality, charisma, and self-
esteem allow Mentor Librarian to be admired by staff and students. In 2001, she earned the
Washington County Public Schools Teacher of the Year Award. She serves as the media
specialist in a building of 500 students ranging from Pre-Kindergarten to Grade 5. The school
also has a special autism program. While Mentor Librarian is a seasoned professional, she found
Wilcox 12
the tools to be a comprehensive resource to help establish goals and collect artifacts to advocate
The interview began with the use of the A Planning Guide for Empowering Learners
assessment rubric. Since Mentor Librarian has been my mentor for approximately two years, I
know that she has the exemplary elementary library. The Washington County Library Media
programs supervisor encourages anyone interested in becoming a media specialist to visit Mentor
Librarian. While Mentor Librarian holds herself to high standards, has numerous accolades over
the years, and consistently has high scores in several areas, Mentor Librarian was quick to
In the area of “Developing Visions for Learning Mission,” Mentor Librarian shared that
she felt her program aligned with the systemic goals and the descriptor “students and staff are
effective users of ideas and information, students are empowered to be critical thinkers,
enthusiastic readers, skillful researchers, and ethical users of information” (AASL 49). While the
mission and vision are not directly stated in the L4L System, the components especially within
Domain 1 and the other three domains are impossible if a clearly defined mission and vision has
not been implemented. As the elementary head librarian, Mentor Librarian works in conjunction
with the supervisor to construct the mission and vision statements of the program at the county
level. The years of experience and vast knowledge of the AASL Standards have helped Mentor
Librarian pioneer the Makerspace movement and transform the media program into the 21st
Century. Therefore, Mentor Librarian suggested that one of her personal strengths relates to
mission and vision of the library program within her school building and at the systemic level.
As the interview continued, Mentor Librarian shared her thoughts regarding the
“Teaching and Learning” portion of the assessment rubric. (AASL 50). When Mentor Librarian
Wilcox 13
was asked regarding “Team Roles,” she shared her program has limitations and scored in the
“Informal” descriptor (AASL 50). She was asked to provide an explanation and Mentor
Librarian stated that she has used a fixed and a flexible schedule. Mentor Librarian felt that the
expectations of classroom teachers did not increase the amount of collaboration using a flexible
schedule. She believed that the flexible schedule caused gaps with students and their knowledge
of information literacy and proficiency with technology tools. As an overall goal, Mentor
Librarian wants to have her staff use the facilities frequently. She does not believe the teachers
utilize the library services extensively and continuously throughout the school year. At the
beginning of the interview before even reviewing the tools, Mentor Librarian listed that she
noted the weakness regarding the staff use of the library resources and services.
When shifting the focus to the “Reading,” Mentor Librarian shared her program meets
most of the top descriptors with the exception of beyond school. During the typical school day,
Mentor Librarian works to create reading promotions that extend beyond school hours. Due to
the working class and limited schedule of the parent population, Mentor Librarian struggles to
extend the community involvement beyond the school environment. She shared that “beyond the
school” promotion was a weakness and showed interest to improving the program component
especially with regarding to students in the primary grades (AASL 51). The focus upon literacy
promotion in the primary grades is essential because the librarian believes the potential energy
and momentum needs to be maintained in the upper grades when the interest for reading
lifelong learning” also aligned with the weakness noted within the interview.
According to the A Planning Guide for Empowering Learners tool, Mentor Librarian has
a space that is almost exemplary for student learning. Frequently, the Mentor Librarian’s
Wilcox 14
physical space is featured as a demonstration library for new and aspiring media specialists.
Findings regarding the physical space were confirmed meeting the “distinguished” category
outlined by The L4L System tool. The space is well organized and Mentor Librarian takes pride
in her library. Within the physical space of the library, Mentor Librarian has a vast collection.
The materials are arranged in a method that is visually appealing and highly organized. Besides
the shelves, Mentor Librarian creates display spaces revolving around specific themes. Mentor
Librarian shares that the materials featured on the displays are heavily circulated because of the
appeal to patrons of all ages. The only descriptor in this category which was scored limited
related to the nature of the fixed schedule which is necessary to provide teachers with their
Collection and Information access is a particular strength for Mentor Librarian. Most of
her scores within the standard were at the highest level. She has strong feelings that collections
must be weeded on a routine basis to improve circulation and meet patron needs. The WCPS
library supervisor often compensates Mentor Librarian to improve outdated collections across
the district. Book fairs are the primary source of funding for Mentor Librarian to expand her
collection. In addition, Mentor Librarian’s expertise is commendable in the district because she
consistently has the highest amount of circulated materials each year. The L4L System ranked
Mentor Librarian as distinguished with respect to collection development. A Planning Guide for
Empowering Learners tool ranked the collection as “curriculum-related” (AASL 61). As a note
of caution, Mentor Librarian suggested that an entire curriculum-based collection might not
circulate as widely because students do not always want materials directly related to learning.
Mentor Librarian has shared that librarians must listen to the requests of students because
students will heavily circulate the materials that relate to their interests.
Wilcox 15
Despite Mentor Librarian’s strengths with the mission and vision, an exemplary physical
space, and excelling with respect to collection development, there is one final weakness
indicated in the assessment rubrics. Mentor Librarian states that she has a concrete understanding
of the Makerspace but students and staff do not comprehend how to the Makerspace fits into the
library setting. While the weakness of Mentor Librarian was not evident in the A Planning Guide
for Empowering Learners tool, the L4L System showed in Domain 2a, 2b, and 2d that student
stamina tends to be lacking during the assigned Media time. She was very vocal and shared that
she is reconsidering how to implement Makerspace time, organize the materials, and prevent loss
or displacement of Makerspace materials. Since Mentor Librarian has spent a great deal of her
book fair profit and time developing the Makerspace, she wants to improve the overall
Part Five: Goal Setting and Objectives using the Evaluation Tools
Goal #1: During the 2018-2019 school year, the school librarian extends reading promotion
activities designed to encourage participation of students, parents, community members, and all
stakeholders.
Objectives The school librarian will host a read-a-thon designed to promote student
engagement in literacy and to raise funds for additions to the collection.
The school librarian will host a “One Book, One Community” event for
students, parents, community members, and stakeholders.
The school librarian will seek partnerships with local businesses and
companies to find guest readers for literacy special events and activities.
Goal #2: During the 2018-2019 school year, the school librarian will extensively showcase
library materials and resources to improve staff circulation statistics.
Objectives The school librarian will extend the library hours to improve the accessibility
of the library for all staff and all stakeholders.
The school librarian will create contest promotions for staff designed to
improve the overall use of print and digital library resources.
The school librarian will distribute a monthly S’more designed to promote
library resources, share technology tips, and describe new offerings added to
the library collection.
Goal #3: During the 2018-2019, the school librarian will define the importance of the
Makerspace and clearly define how the Makerspace can support the curriculum for students and
staff.
Objectives The school librarian will develop Makerspace activities to correspond with
current units of instruction rather than the current model of free exploration.
The school librarian will hold professional development activities to
demonstrate the alignment of Makerspace activities with the Essential
Curriculum document.
The school librarian will begin the year with a growth mindset literature set
to establish clearly defined norms and expectations for the Makerspace and
inquiry experiences in the school library setting.
Wilcox 17
After analyzing the interview findings with Mentor Librarian, reviewing my work in
Module 2 with respect to advocacy, and reviewing the Williamsport Elementary School
Improvement goals, I have decided to focus upon three components from the AASL’s L4L
Sample School Librarian Performance and Evaluation. Washington County Public Schools
currently uses the Charlotte Danielson framework and the AASL’s L4L Sample School Librarian
Performance and Evaluation is simplistic enough to establish obtainable short and long term
goals. Out of the three Williamsport Elementary School Improvement goals, I determined that
Goal 1: All students will read at or above grade level by 3rd Grade and continue to read at or
above grade level thereafter was significant. The goal pertaining to improving literacy is a shared
belief within the school, at the county level, and a focus of the new Washington County Public
School superintendent.
Goal #1 During the 2018-2019 school year, the school librarian communicates and
informs students, staff, and all stakeholders about the resources and services
available from the Williamsport Elementary School Library.
L4L Alignment Component 4c: Communicating with School Staff and Community
During my interview with Mentor Librarian, she shared the importance of having parents
and community member reinforcement to help forward literacy goals. When I was in the general
education classroom, I recall parents sharing their frustration because textbooks were obsolete
and parents wanted to help their child yet did not have the resources. As a librarian, I am aware
of the multiple and underused materials in the school library. Over the past two years, I have
dedicated my time to establishing relationships and getting to know the student and school
community. If I were to evaluate myself in the domain, I would believe I would score “basic-The
school librarian communicates inconsistently with the school staff and community to keep them
informed and to promote the use of the library program, new resources and services” (AASL
Wilcox 18
L4L 10). The description for “proficient-The school librarian communicates with the school staff
and community to keep them informed and to promote the use of the library program, new
resources and services” seems easily obtainable (AASL L4L 10), The work completed in the
Advocacy course module and the course readings helped me realize that communication does not
require a great deal of time. By preparing one or two paragraphs about library services and
promotions, I can widely share the information by Facebook, Twitter, the school webpage, the
newsletter, and the local newspaper with administrator and central office approval. Once I have
reached my short term goal of proficiency with respect to Component 4c, I plan to set a long
term goal for soliciting feedback from school staff and community members regarding the
library services and programs. The feedback component is the feature which separates the
distinguished and the proficient categories within Component 4c (AASL L4L 10).
Goal #2 During the 2018-2019 school year, the school librarian will improve the
overall library physical space by adding space for independent reading and
improving signage to allow for easier access of materials.
L4L Alignment Component 2e: Organizing physical space
When I prepared for my interview with Mentor Librarian, I felt like I was expecting a
visit from the President or Queen of England. She requested a visit to my library because we
spent the previous summer weeding my collection and I believe she was curious to see the
changes that I made over the past two years. I straightened shelves and rearranged books in
anticipation of her arrival. Mentor Librarian is meticulous about library shelves and organization.
In my two years as a media specialist, I visited Mentor Librarian’s space on a monthly basis. The
position, I was aware that I had to update my library facilities. The library media programs
supervisor purchased several items to help improve the aesthetics and functionality of my library.
Currently, my library meets the criteria for “proficient” because it is “organized for safety, ease
Wilcox 19
of traffic flow, and learning” (AASL L4L 6). However, my students have expressed that there is
not enough signage to quickly and easily access materials. The description for “distinguished”
explains that “significant signage is provided to support self directed use” (AASL L4L 6). My
supervisor has shared that she will gladly help me improve my signage but she would like to
continue to add furnishing to the space. Once she has added all the furnishings and I have
rearranged the space for functionality, then I know I will be able to acquire some permanent
signage. A short term goal is to create some temporary signage to help assist patrons during the
transition process. Once the space is complete, I intend to acquire permanent signage from the
Goal #3 During the 2018-2019, the school librarian will improve overall
collaboration with classroom teachers by attending grade-level team
meetings and content specific professional development activities.
L4L Alignment Component 1f: Collaborating in the Design of Instructional Experiences
Mentor Librarian shared that has time with the fixed schedule to collaborate with
classroom teachers. Since my situation is similar to Mentor Librarian’s, I know that I need to
focus upon improving teacher collaboration. At the current time, I believe I am in the
learning activities that integrate the use of multiple resources, and the development of research
skills and strategies” (L4L 4). In order to reach the distinguished category, I am aware that I need
to collaborate with most of the classroom teachers. A benefit to students would be to collaborate
with the other members of my team to allow for integrating of music, art, and PE into the
administrator to seek solutions to improve the current level of collaboration. I do not believe I
can expand the level of help without the support and possible schedule adjustments from the
administrative team.
Wilcox 20
Works Cited
System. http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/guidelinesandstandards/lea
www.ala.org/aasl/advocacy/tools/toolkits.
docs.google.com/document/d/1D9CZp1_RfT64m98RD9lOzMod8A6wFNGJKPaF6-