Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1 QUOTES [001]
"The Public are told FAIRY STORIES. Every generation is told a MYTH and it's called "HISTORY". -
Alan Watt
"Wars are very expensive. Wars take many many years of planning BEFORE they actually take place -
NOTHING is ever spontaneous" - Alan Watt
This is, NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN and the real facts of the day is that NOTHING happens
by chance!
Post 1933 we have NO PUBLIC LAW RECOGNIZING UNALIENABLE RIGHTS for men and women. In fact
there are no unalienable rights for ANY participants in the court system, because the court system ONLY has as
participants, TITLES OF NOBIILTY and FICTIONS. Titles of Nobility and FICTIONS do NOT have unalienable
rights so the court system does NOT have to grant unalienable rights to anyone that’s a participant in the court
system.” – Jack Smith.
“Are you meaning to tell me/us that you are operating your office in violation of the State’s Statutes, which
REQUIRE YOU to have an EVIDENCE FILE for each case ALSO? (As well as a Folder)
Now since this is a question,, the party asking this question is coming from a POSITION OF AUTHORITY, not
from the position of DUTY. If you PROPOSE it you MUST PROVE IT if you question it, they MUST respond to
you otherwise they are WAIVING certain defenses and rights.” – Jack Smith.
In other words the government CREATED YOU as a LEGAL ENTITY and the government has a “RIGHT” to tax
it’s creation in any way shape and form it wants. The government CANNOT tax people because the government
did NOT create people, God created people but the government when it creates a corporation can tax its own
corporate entities into oblivion. So therefore NO MAN or WOMAN EVER worked for any corporation in the
modern times, all that WORKS for the corporations are ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES, FICTION-STRAWMEN.”
– Jack Smith.
Remember THE CHARGE IS A PUBLIC OFFERING and once you APPEAR to answer that public
offering in the public - YOU ARE IN PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE of a PUBLIC CONTRACT and I am
TELLING YOU your ONLY REMEDY is to get a PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE to
get you your remedy.
A Public offer with private acceptance will get you BOAT LOADS of problems because you’re UNDER
PUBLIC POLICY. Understand it this way, if you have a PRIVATE OFFERING with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE
THE ONE WHO HAS CONTROL OVER IT must value the property MORE than anyone
else because CONTROL is just about everything and who has control of everything? –
THE STATE!
You people have ALL the unalienable rights to property BUT you gave them up to people
who have MORE KNOWLEDGE to what’s going on by VOLUNTARY CONTRACT and
so YOU AIN’T GOT THEM NO MORE! Because you can VOLUNTARILY
RELINQUISH your rights BY CONTRACT.” – Jack Smith.
“How do you do these CONTRACTS and stay in CONTROL? You have to understand the
PROTOCOLS because the protocols are SYMBOLIC of who you are willing to become in the
relationship and if you don’t understand that the protocols are symbolic of the CONTRACT that you
are negotiating and then you can say one thing and then do the opposite by your protocols. Your
protocols are presumed to be YOUR ACTIONS, they speak LOUDER than your words and if you are
contravening your own words and so your actions put you in a disadvantage from the contract and into
the public and just like the Judge says, “All your unalienable rights are now CONTRACTED AWAY
and they are now in the hands of those that VALUE them the most. Who values them the most? Those
that UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE and how you maintain them. Evidently you didn’t learn how to
maintain and negotiate and maintain those rights!” – Jack Smith.
“The problem is that you go to the PUBLIC FOOL SYSTEM and they’re NOT about training you on
CONTRACTS on the PRIVATE SIDE, they’re about getting you to ACCEPT PUBLIC
OFFERINGS so that the schools of the corporations are in CONTROL.” – Jack Smith.
KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 8 of 43
36 RESIDENT- INHABITANT [036] ****** TAXATION
“The term RESIDE technically “moves” you off the Land. A RESIDENT in INTERNATIONAL LAW
is a PERSON in a country NOT his own and INHABITANTS are the same thing, it’s all deceptive.”
L.B Bork.
Brian, W. - this one is especially for you! Please take note where Sam Davis says that he becomes a
BROKEN RECORD! And does NOT STRAY. when you start "discussing' your case you are now
"ADDING TO IT" and are testifying. - This one is a CRITICAL one to understand when proceeding with
a private administrative process and your affidavit in a court or tribunal.
Just like Sam Davis says, you must be like a Broken Record and NOT TESTIFY and "add to it"
(Your Affidavit).
If it was an ACTUAL lien you would have had your DUE PROCESS and you would have had your Judgement
by a court of competent jurisdiction. It would be SPECIFIC and CONCISE. You would have had your say. You
must stick to the DUE PROCESS ISSUE. And NOT allow them to pull the smoke and mirrors because this all
boils down to DUE PROCESS.” You see when this NOTICE OF LIEN is presented to the recorders office it does
NOT contain a SWORN AFFIDAVIT assessment and signed in FRONT of the recorder in front of the NOTARY as
being TRUE, CORRECT and COMPLETE. THAT IS THE NECESSARY CERTIFICATION therefore it’s ONLY a
NON-Negotiable, non-spendable piece of paper or instrument which means that it CANNOT be used in
commerce as MONEY, after maturing unchallenged after 90 days to procure and sell property. You don’t have an
actual place that you can go and REVIEW the ACTUAL lien and REFUTE it. So they are a FRAUDULENT
SECURITY because they are COUNTERFEITED into an “Evidence of Debt”, they’re numbered, they’re recorded
and they’re used in COMMERCE to levy.” Rae Copitka – Lighting the Fires of Liberty
Where THEY GET YOU, is that you have DECLARED YOURSELF, unknowingly to be a VESSEL (of the
United States/Australia) because it says a VESSEL of WHATEVER kind. “ – Bill the Freeholder
That IMMEDIATELY puts them ON NOTICE that we know our stature, we know our place in Society and it is
ABOVE those who we are addressing and it is called POLITICAL jurisdiction because everything you deal with
today in Society is the Corporation, you DO have a political status and you have to take on the PERSONAL
jurisdiction in order to put yourself ABOVE the political because Political is what they GIVE YOU in the
Corporation.
You have political, personal and subject matter jurisdiction and you HAVE TO take on the PERSONAL
jurisdiction in order to put yourself ABOVE the political. The first thing that they ask you in the courts is to
please state your name and address for the records. IF YOU DO, THEY’VE GOT YOU! You have ACQUIESCED.
So a NAME only applies to PROPERTY and if you want to be PROPERTY, you want to be somebody’s
property, somebody’s SLAVE then you can give them your name but otherwise you JUST ARE who you are.” –
Rae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]
“The point we want to make here is that WE DON’T want to sue them as a governmental entity. You don’t win
when you sue against the government so we’re looking at HOLDING them PERSONALLY LIABLE and the way
to do that is once you have made a government official AWARE of a crime and they FAIL to act then they are
stripped of their governmental immunity and we’re giving them all the OPPORTUNITY and ALLTHE ROPE that
they need to hang themselves. Once you NOTIFY them of the FRAUD and they CONTINUE to do it, it’s called
FRAUD WITH SCIENTER” – Rae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]
http://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-fin Scienter
Previous knowledge of operative facts, frequently signifying guilty knowledge. As used in Pleadings, the
term signifies that the alleged crime or Tort was done designedly or with guilty knowledge. The term is
usually employed in relation to Fraud, and means a person's knowledge that he was making false
representations, with intent to deceive.
The term scienter refers to a state of mind often required to hold a person legally accountable for her acts.
The term often is used interchangeably with mens rea, which describes criminal intent, but scienter has a
broader application because it also describes knowledge required to assign liability in many civil cases.
TESTIMONY COURT
Testimony = test – the – money Claude Memma
“I would like to point out the meaning of the word “MUST”. They will tell you that “you MUST apply, you
MUST register”. They want you to think that you have an “OBLIGATION” to engage in a certain action. If you
had an “obligation”, they would use the word “OBLIGE”. The word MUST is very tricky, it has two senses, one
is an ACTIVE and one is a PASSIVE. If I tell you, “You MUST come to my party through the front door” Am I
creating an “obligation” upon you to attend my party? Or am I defining that IF YOU CHOOSE to voluntarily
take them, it will grant me AUTHORITY OVER YOU. –That’s THEIR word “MUST”. It creates NO
OBLIGATION, it DEFINES the parameters that will GIVE THEM AUTHORITY and they’ve got everyone
thinking it’s an obligation on OUR part and they then point to it and say “well you entered into it voluntarily.”
“The word MUST – It doesn’t create an “Obligation” it defines the path, which IF YOU VOLUNTARILY take it
will TRANSFER AUTHORITY to another.” – Robert: Arthur- Menard
So the name that is ENTERED onto the statement of BIRTH is actually given to the government and
the name that I SPOKE to my child is the one that I gave to my child – NOT the name that is on paper
to the government” Victor-Robert: Beck
APPLICATION-REGISTRATION-SUBMISSION CONTRACT
“These THREE words is how the government has been getting the authority OVER us,
REGISTRATION, APPLICATION and SUBMISSION. All of the power that they have over YOU
is because you have put YOUR signature on a document with one, two or three of these words. The
word REGISTRATION, what does it mean? “Oh I thought I was just putting my name down? Uh, uh,
No, historically it goes back hundreds and hundreds of years to an act of a ships Captain, signing
OVER his ship and all Chattel contents to the harbour master for SAFE KEEPING. Chattel contents
included the SLAVES, the condemned, those is DEBT and anything that could be a party to a contract.
“APPLICATION- means to BEG, to plead, petition, implore and requests. If you want to know what
this word is going to have on your life, you need to have MORE than just the definition. You need to
look at the ASSUMPTIONS that this definition rests upon and then you need to look at the
implications created by The Assumptions CREATED by BEGGING. He who BEGS, knows exactly
what he is begging for, they know exactly what they’re t willing to give up for it, they are
ACKNOWLEDGING the authority to GRANT or if it doesn’t exist they’re willing to create it
through transference.
We TRANSFER that AUTHORITY if that authority doesn’t ALREADY exist when we “APPLY”
and finally BECAUSE you are a human being and no one is EVER obliged to beg, it is an ENTIRELY
VOLUNTARY ACTION. You can NEVER claim, oh they made me “APPLY”. No-one has EVER
made you apply for anything,”
“SUBMISSION is their OTHER tricky little definition. It means TO AGREE to BEND to another’s
will or to lead to another’s discretion. If you are AGREEING to bend to someone’s will, you are IN
CONTRACT with them and again in order for it to be voluntarily and lawful it HAS to be voluntary. If
you are agreeing to LEAVE something at someone’s discretion and in order for you to LEGALLY
leave something, you must have possession and OWNERSHIP of it. Again you are ABANDONING it
and it is an ENTIRELY voluntary action.
They get ALL YOUR POWER when you PUT your SIGNATURE which is EVIDENCE of a NOTE
on a document with the word REGISTRATION-APPLICATION-SUBMISSION.
They do it with every thing. You want to register your kids? What are you going to do? You’re
SUBMITTING an APPLICATION for REGISTRATION. You want to register REAL property then
you SUBMIT your APPLICATION for REGISTRATION, - EVERY TIME!” – Robert-Arthur:
Menard. "Truth does not have to be believed for it to be true!"
What is their TRICK here? In other words they sent it to the DEFENDANT. You see the
DEFENDANT is a CREATION, it’s a TRUST and as a TRUST, there are TWO SIDES to the Trust,
there is the CONTROLLER and there is the OPERATOR to that Trust. The OPERATORS are the
OWNER/USERS and they’re the debtors. The CONTROLLERS are the CREDITORS and they
make the legal determination. Now the government THROWS the DEFENDANT out as the
“CALLING CARD” as the attraction and they NEVER throw it out there and say, “We’re the
government and we’re CONTROLLING this entity.” They just “throw” it out there to see what the
other party is going to do. And if you start DEFENDING it, you’re the OWNER/OPERATOR of that
entity, so you have CHOSEN UNWISELY to be the DEBTOR, which makes the government
automatically, be default, the CREDITOR.
When you RETURN ALL THE DOCUMENTATION for SETTLEMENT and CLOSURE and
then use your authority to SETTLE and CLOSE the CHARGES, you’re acting like the
CONTROLLER, which makes the government the OWNER/OPERATOR and DEBTOR. They
always take what it is that YOU don’t perform BY DEFAULT.” – Jack Smith.
It could be a one page scribbled letter saying, “Here’s a copy of a Bond. Please note that you have been
named thereon and hence I am the UNDERWRITER or TITLE HOLDER or FIRST IN LINE
LIEN HOLDER. I have the First right of Lien to this transaction (To this matter or to this issue or to
this case) – Dr Sam Kennedy.
One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and it
is considered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20,
30 or even 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that it
SCATTERS FAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE “rainbow” welfare
state that takes care of you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could fail
virtually completely and there’s still this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but it
also destroys the family because everyone is FREE to “break off” on their own, establish their
own roots and buy “their own Box” and try to desperately pay for it and even go into debt just
for the basics. This WHOLE system goes against the family to PULL together as a team as was
100 plus years ago.’
CHALLENGE
This comes from the Following website (click on Link) - www.thinkfree.ca
To: Any and All members of The Law Society of BC or Canadian Bar
Association
TOPICS TO BE DEBATED:
Do statutes enjoy the force of law without the consent of the governed?(Freeman
Robert-Arthur says No)
Can we abandon our SIN and avoid paying income taxes? (Freeman Robert-Arthur
says Yes)
Can we fire the government and exist free of all statutory restraints and
obligations? (Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)
Do the people of British Columbia have a right to justice and can they lawfully
convene their own courts to bring charges against the existing courts?
(Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)
If this challenge is not accepted then it shall be deemed that all of the above
things Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard is willing to debate and
defend are in fact truths and do in fact bind the government and those to whom
this challenge has been extended. If this challenge is not accepted then a seminar
explaining all these truths will be presented. Furthermore failure to accept this
lawful challenge will be seen by most as evidence that the government has been
knowingly and willfully employing negligence, deception and fraud. Go to
www.thinkfree.ca for more details
“Next time a court session is there and I show up again and the judge says, “Have you got an attorney?” WHO
DOES HE THINK I AM? THE DEFENDANT, TOBY THE SLAVE! How am I going to respond to the
judge? ASK A QUESTION! “Your Honour, hasn’t the court been notified that they are the
OPERATOR of the ACCOUNT through the SURRENDER OF THE DEFENDANT? Has the court not
seen fit to appoint counsel for the DEFENDANT? And then shut the heck up! What have you just done? The
court is going to have to come up with some kind of story to fill the embarrassment.” Do you understand? If you
want to volunteer and be TOBY, the Defendant, go ahead! And if you say nothing, you either are in
CONTEMPT of court or you volunteer to be TOBY!- Jack Smith
One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and it
is considered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20,
30 or even 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that it
SCATTERS FAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE “rainbow” welfare
state that takes care of you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could fail
virtually completely and there’s still this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but it
also destroys the family because everyone is FREE to “break off” on their own, establish their
own roots and buy “their own Box” and try to desperately pay for it and even go into debt just
for the basics. This WHOLE system goes against the family to PULL together as a team as was
100 plus years ago.’
Our Father who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thou shalt be done on earth
as it is in Heaven, give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors,
and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil, for thyne is the kingdom and the power and
the glory forever and ever......... In other words, however Heaven is, so to is it the same here on earth,
except judgement gets in the way.
God in Heaven = Property/Growth/Multiply = god on earth/Government
____________________________________________________________________
PEOPLE/Son = GOODS AND SERVICES = TITLE/SON
“All the companies you are doing business with believe you ARE the BIRTH
CERTIFICATE/STRAWMAN – that’s the PROBLEM, nothing else, It SITS right there”- Victor
Robert: Beck
[Remember that ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY WAS GIVEN UNTO YOU!- AS THE
PRINCIPAL!]
"So in effect what's happening is that the FIDUCIARIES are RUNNING the world instead of the
PRINICIPALS. The PRINICIPALS HAVE NOT shown up yet- And that's YOU PEOPLE!"- Victor-
Robert: Beck
I just want to caution everyone against going down the path of placing liens against officials,
or liquidating any person and/or thinking about conversion of dishonours into monetary gains,
especially if you are proceeding in any matter whereby YOU are the party seeking a remedy
[i.e. from a defensive position].
This type of thinking really does stem from the assumption and presumption that the public
officials are corrupt and do not operate within the law. All public officials have a duty and
obligation to protect one's rights and from my own experience they do in fact protect them, but
more so when one seeking a remedy has gone about it in the correct manner - which is really
what the problem is - a lack of knowledge as to how to do this. The public officials do in fact
deliberately go into a dishonour in order to give you your remedy which usually manifests
itself in silence or argument in order to AGREE with you. Once one has that AGREEMENT
through the silence of one or more of the public officials one must be focused upon using that
dishonour as evidence of their agreement rather than on placing liens, liquidation or any
conversion of that dishonour into public liability instruments which in and of itself is going
against the grain, if you are expecting the public officials to recognize that you are the living
breathing sentient man who knows there is no money.
Once you have a public official in a dishonour and therefore their agreement by that
dishonour [silence or argument], then one's honourable duty and obligation is to present their
record of that dishonour [agreement/stipulation] to the appropriate data integrity review
board for review in order to have the records corrected - one should not be doing any form of
charging or attacking at that time. Other than proceeding on the very counterproductive
assumption and presumption that the public officials are deliberately corrupt I cannot see how
conversion of a dishonour into funds or placing any liens on any public officials or liquidating
any public official can still be proceeding in an honourable manner. From my relatively
medium term but very intensive experience and focus, this type of thinking arises out of both
a lack of practical experience and adequate understanding of the procedures that one must
follow and apply to obtain their remedy in an honourable manner.
Scripture does NOT say, "go first to your brother and get an agreement [stipulation through
his silence and/or arguments which both constitute a dishonour] and then either liquidate him
or convert that dishonour into funny money or place a lien on him"
If one has to resort to liquidation or placing of liens or conversion of dishonours into funny
money when there is clearly a remedy without having to resort to such tactics, then one
should perhaps consider embarking on that journey to find the rest of the pieces of the puzzle
which they have not yet discovered ather than attempting to charge their brother. The majority
of people appear to end up going down the incorrect road rather than admitting that they are
"not there yet". Regards Claude
In context of COMMERCE what that means is that we take their DISHONOUR, the CONVERSION
OF LIABILITY and we use that as the MONETARY EXPANSION to fund an instrument to
Treasury to have Treasury SECURE or SEIZE the Fugitive or STOLEN funds from the presenters
bond.
How can a DISHONOUR be funds? Well a dishonour is NOTHING MORE than a LIABILITY and it
is CERTIFIED as a liability. It is CLEAR that in the system of COMMERCE, the system of
BANKRUPTCY in which we NOW exist in, a commercial system based upon an ABSENCE of
tangible assets ( SUBSTANCE MONEY) AND uses as its monetary curriculum LIABILITY!
LIABILITY IS THE CURRICULUM OF PAYMENT! A FICTIONAL ASSET IN THE
SYSTEM. The liability of a DISHONOUR is in theory the same as payment of the instrument of which
the dishonour is DULY NOTED.
If you pay Federal Reserve notes to someone, $100 dollars and they send it back to you and say “I’m
sorry we only accept cheques” they have CONVERTED THE LIABILITY into FUNDS that they
have to then apply against the account. I paid YOU the $100, you REJECTED IT, YOU are now
HOLDING THE LIABILITY – ergo you’re holding the funds to SETTLE THAT ACCOUNT, It is
now a DONE DEAL! That is why the funds can be used to FUND a payment instrument to the
Secretary of the Treasury!” Dr Sam Kennedy
Typically in Admiralty that party would be an OWNER of the VESSEL or an INTERESTED CREDITOR who
wishes to protect his claim for some third party with an interest who steps up and says, “I will accept
responsibility.” The way in which the lawyer emphasizes, legally speaking, that ACCEPTANCE or
responsibility is he ISSUES A BOND, on the public side or in modern times what is also called “A Statement of
Interest” which is considered to be the equivalent to a bond. A BOND in the PUBLIC is NOTHING MORE than
a FICTIONAL piece of paper, it stands for NOTHING except a LIEN against TITLE.
And this is what this is all about – SECURITY INTERESTS & TITLES.
So the lawyer walks in (to court) he rolls the dice and he is going to put the charges out there because “we’re
such a big bad wolf” that people are going to SHIVER and they will be HAPPY to step forward (To argue) and
hire another Lawyer (Hired Mercenary) to step forward so that the can say, “This is my CLIENT – My defendant
and we waive a formal reading of the charges” and THAT’S ALL IT TAKES TO BECOME A SURETY when
they are playing against someone who DOESN’T KNOW how the (Commercial) Game is played.
You DO NOT have to step forward and become that surety. However you have a choice, you CAN become the
surety or NOT BECOME the surety. However when you decide NOT to become the SURETY that is when
things become VERY HOT.
The reason they get hot is OBVIOUSLY the lawyer IS HOLDING THE BAG and he is COMPLETELY
LIABLE, technically and on paper because there’s ONLY one piece of paper the so called CHARGING
INSTRUMENT filed into that case at that time and in fact IT’S NOT TRULY a case but there is ONLY one
piece of paper, that NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT and the LAWYER IS LIABLE for making that so called
claim ( Until someone comes in and ARGUES, which is the equivalent to “refusing to pay” the negotiable
instrument and then the liability ATTACHES TO YOU!) ]
But at this point until someone does ARGUE, the charges are HOLLOW. You have heard that expression to
CHARGE UP A BILL, well that’s what it’s referring to. The thing HAS NO SUBSTANCE behind it. It is
STRICTLY waiting for you to STEP FORWARD; it’s waiting for a SUCKER! And you are stepping forward
and saying, “Yes I will accept responsibility”
IF-YOU-DON’T, the lawyer who leveled that charge and presents that to the court is COMPLETELY
LIABLE COMMERCIALLY and CORPOREALLY for that charge. Someone HAS TO FUND that charge
“Now if the defendant, DOES NOT REBUT the ASSUMPTIONS and PRESUMPTIONS then according to the
rules of procedure in an Equity Court, their FAILURE to rebut them must mean what? THEY MUST BE TRUE!
Because you didn’t rebut them which in CONTRACT law you have now ACCEPTED THE PROPOSITION. IF
YOU DIDN’T REBUT THEM, THIS NOW IS ACCEPTANCE. So if you have OFFER and ACCEPTANCE isn’t
that a CONTRACT? – ABSOLUTELY BECAUSE NOW THE PARTIES ARE IN AGREEMENT! - Jack Smith.
“This is VERY, VERY CRITICAL for EVERYBODY to understand because this is HOW the courts are
SCHNOOKERING you. The whole thing going on here is that the PLAINTIFF DOESN’T PROVE ANYTHING,
unless he has to and the only time he has to is if the defendant comes back and REBUTS the charges and
presumptions. Now if the plaintiff has put on NO VIABLE evidence, which they’re not going to in the first part
of the trial anyway to make this thing WORK BY CONTRACT which they are doing the majority of the time. All
they want is an AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES that your guilty, that’s all they have to do. If the prosecution
can get an AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES that you’re guilty of the facts and the charges then the court will
find you guilty every time. If they CAN’T prove it they can get your AGREEMENT and that is JUST AS GOOD
or maybe even better because that’s like a CONFESSION in court. So what they do in order to SCHNOOKER
you is that it looks like they are putting on evidence in the case, but anybody who understands the rules of
evidence So if the defence through the defence attorneys don’t REBUT the presumptions, the plaintiff DOESN’T
have to bring evidence to the case. So in LOGIC what this means then is WHY wouldn’t the defendant REBUT
the presumption of the charges? There are only TWO reasons why, number;
• 1] is because they don’t understand that they HAVE to do that in order to save the case- IGNORANCE!
• 2] They’re GUILTY as hell and if they tried to get rebuttals on the stand it would be a lie and a forgery
and they would be exposed in what they’re attempting to do and it could lead to even more criminal
charges.
“The ONLY intellectual reason that the judge can accept that the defendant didn’t rebut the charges is because
he’s admitting guilt. Isn’t an ADMISSION OF THE CHARGES, “ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT” with the
prosecution? ABSOLUTELY! So the defendant has now just entered into a CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT with
the court, TO BE FOUND GUILTY. IT’S ALL CONTRACT LAW! THE WAY YOU REBUT PRESUMPTIONS IN
LAW IS BY NEGATIVE AVERMENT.
This below is ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL information to understand, keep this in your files! -
Pierino.
“Remember that the PRESUMPTION, this whole case in EQUITY goes on that when the party is
CHARGED, the ONLY thing that they have to do is REBUT THE PRESUMPTIONS of the charges
and the charges will only ever be proved BY PRESUMPTIONS and NEVER by evidence. But the only
time the prosecutor has to really do a job and do it UNDER the law is if the defendant HAS
REBUTTED the presumptions and not evidence because there’s not ever been any evidence.”
“Now if the defendant, DOES NOT REBUT the ASSUMPTIONS and PRESUMPTIONS then
according to the rules of procedure in an Equity Court, their FAILURE to rebut them must
mean what? THEY MUST BE TRUE! Because you didn’t rebut them which in CONTRACT
law you have now ACCEPTED THE PROPOSITION. IF YOU DIDN’T REBUT THEM, THIS
NOW IS ACCEPTANCE. So if you have OFFER and ACCEPTANCE isn’t that a
CONTRACT? – ABSOLUTELY BECAUSE NOW THE PARTIES ARE IN AGREEMENT!
[STIPULATED TO THE ASSUMPTIONS & PRESUMPTIONS]
Keep this little "baby" definition handy! Folks! This is under the "Civil rules of Procedure!"
“Basically a NEGATIVE AVERMENT is an ABSOLUTE NECESSARY and IMPERATIVE
PLEADING to REBUT any presumptions in any pleadings brought by the plaintiff or the
PROSECUTION.”- Jack Smith
IDENTIFICATION IDENTIFICATION
“Well the only reason for paperwork most of the time is IDENTIFICATION and identification is
CRITICAL because we all know under the law FORM either
[A] you’re entitled to the pre-paid (Exemption) account or (CREDITOR CAPACITY)
[B] you’re a COMMERCIAL and POLITICAL SLAVE and you have NO RIGHT to an
exemption.(DEBTOR CAPACITY).
And what the government officials have to DETERMINE as QUICKLY as possible is which one of
these two categories doyou fit into.
The first thing that these people want to know is WHO they are dealing with and the RULES OF
PROCEDURE are DIFFERENT between one who is in the class of being able to use an exemption
versus one who is a COMMERCIAL or POLITICAL SLAVE and there is NO exemption permitted.” –
Jack Smith.
The work from Johns Hopkins University by Mr Lee clearly recognizes that Babylon's Religious
Priesthood is commonly recognizable as the source of all of the modern so called "Laws of
Commerce". These "Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes which authorize
the Administration of the Compelling Force of the State in the En-Force-ment of Contracts,
mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because
Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" entered into by the contracting parties;
and the approval of their Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize/bamboozle
the entire process in the minds and the consciences of the contracting parties and all public
witnesses.
These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability to buy and sell contracts between
merchants in "Commerce". They sold and "bought . . . slaves and the souls of men" in the time
of Christ, and before and after, just precisely as is recognized in Revelation 18: 11-13. Under this
system of Babylonian Codes, contracted-debtor-people were Forcibly Compelled to perform
the contract regardless of Conscionability, or who was the original contract-creditor. This
Babylonian Religious Commercial-Code depended in large part on a deeper set of Slave-
Trading Codes. And these all are still recognizable and very frequently enforced under what
modern legal text-books refer to as: "Master-Servant Relationships".
Under the ancient Babylonian Religious Codes, "Slavery" is clearly facilitated. People were not
recognized as People there-under, but were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested and
assaulted by government officers for not showing up for work on time. The text-book says that
QUOTE!
"The Minds of men do NOT have a Firewall when it comes to Information" - Anonymous
Maxim: Your failure to object timely is fatal. This is called the "Doctrine of Laches" and it is the
failure to assert a right timely. You can claim your right to be "exempt from Involuntary servitude".
“ all authority and POWER is given unto "we the people" - EACH INDIVIDUAL, not toward over
another.
“Now if the defendant, DOES NOT REBUT the ASSUMPTIONS and PRESUMPTIONS then according to the
rules of procedure in an Equity Court, their FAILURE to rebut them must mean what? THEY MUST BE TRUE!
Because you didn’t rebut them which in CONTRACT law you have now ACCEPTED THE PROPOSITION. IF
YOU DIDN’T REBUT THEM, THIS NOW IS ACCEPTANCE. So if you have OFFER and ACCEPTANCE isn’t
that a CONTRACT? – ABSOLUTELY - BECAUSE NOW THE PARTIES ARE IN AGREEMENT! -
“This is VERY, VERY CRITICAL for EVERYBODY to understand because this is HOW the courts are
SCHNOOKERING you. The whole thing going on here is that the PLAINTIFF DOESN’T PROVE ANYTHING,
unless he has to and the only time he has to is if the defendant comes back and REBUTS the charges and
presumptions. Now if the plaintiff has put on NO VIABLE evidence, which they’re not going to in the first part
of the trial anyway to make this thing WORK BY CONTRACT which they are doing the majority of the time. All
they want is an AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES that your guilty, that’s all they have to do. If the prosecution
can get an AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES that you’re guilty of the facts and the charges then the court will
find you guilty every time.
If they CAN’T prove it they can get your AGREEMENT and that is JUST AS GOOD or maybe even better
because that’s like a CONFESSION in court. So what they do in order to SCHNOOKER you is that it looks like
they are putting on evidence in the case, but anybody who understands the rules of evidence So if the defence
through the defence attorneys don’t REBUT the presumptions, the plaintiff DOESN’T have to bring evidence to
the case. So in LOGIC what this means then is WHY wouldn’t the defendant REBUT the presumption of the
charges? There are only TWO reasons why, number;
• 1] is because they don’t understand that they HAVE to do that in order to save the case- IGNORANCE!
• 2] They’re GUILTY as hell and if they tried to get rebuttals on the stand it would be a lie and a forgery
and they would be exposed in what they’re attempting to do and it could lead to even more criminal
charges.
“The ONLY intellectual reason that the judge can accept that the defendant didn’t rebut the charges is because
he’s admitting guilt. Isn’t an ADMISSION OF THE CHARGES, “ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT” with the
prosecution? ABSOLUTELY! So the defendant has now just entered into a CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT with
the court, TO BE FOUND GUILTY. IT’S ALL CONTRACT LAW! THE WAY YOU REBUT PRESUMPTIONS IN
LAW IS BY NEGATIVE AVERMENT.
QUOTE
"In MY WORLD, the TRUTH is that, which EXPOSES the Lie" - Victor Robert Beck.
Our public schools teach us about Bonds instead of PRIVATE PROPERTY. Our public schools teach us about
PUBLIC business LICENCES that we can be doctors and Dentists and Lawyers [Liars] INSTEAD of PRIVATE
BUSINESS MEN and they teach us in public schools about PERMITS instead of PRIVATE RIGHTS. Our public
schools teach us about PUBLIC interest professions like doctors and dentists instead of COMMON LAW
OCCUPATIONS. We learn about INTEREST ACCOUNTS but we DON’T learn about SUBSTANCE and
CHATTELS.
We learn about Cheques but not Warehouse receipts. We learn about insurance and Limited Liability but we
learn very precious little about individual responsibility, then we complain that our liberties and freedoms are
being taken away from us. We learn about Marriage licenses but we don’t learn about PATRIACHAL families.
We learn about Marriage, not from the Bible but from the State.” – George Gordon
72.2 LEGISLATION
72.2.1 Two entities that are indebted to each other may have a right of 'set-off', leaving a residual
obligation from one entity to the other. This entitlement to set-off may arise under general law-for
example, equitable or legal set-off, or statute. Generally, this power to set-off is available to all types of
“You could ask “Mr. Banker, do you believe that (Birth Certificate) to be my personal
identification?
If he/she says yes, you could respond
“What if it’s not sir? Would you not be committing fraud if you identify me by something that
does NOT identify me? Perhaps you may want to get some legal advice before you say that again!
You basically put the TRUTH On the table and then the ball is in their court!” Victor-Robert: Beck
SLIDERS AUTHORITY
This TRICK is used a lot, and it is called “SLIDERS”
In A Govt Agency, ANY TIME they put a document on a counter and IT MAKES A LITTLE
SLIDING SOUND and they want you to PICK that document up, - that’s a SLIDER.
They are giving you an OPPORTUNITY and it is a VOLUNTARY action. NO-ONE is taking this
document and enforcing it upon you. YOU are ACTING VOLUNTARILY to pick that up and that’s
why they SLIDE it like that.
You go ahead and touch it if you want. You have the right to pick it up, turn it around and SLIDE it
back right to them. EVERYTIME they SLIDE you something there trying to get rid of something,
you know like the ‘QUEEN OF SPADES”. Flip it over and slide it right back because there is
NOTHING that they can do.!
[Bottom line] EVERYTIME they are SLIDING you something it is going to CAUSE you to GIVE
THEM AUTHORITY – OVER YOU! - Robert-Arthur: Menard
“What is the INTENT of the government and the BANKERS? To keep you a slave! How do they
enslave you? By your IGNORANCE? What ignorance do you have and what do they do to
MOTIVATE that ignorance to enslave you? They ENTICE you to PLAY THE PART of the
DEBTOR. Now in REALITY the people are NOT the DEBTORs, they are the CREDITORs. So they
HAVE TO CONFUSE the people enough so that they won’t understand that THE PEOPLE are the
CREDITORS and that they will START TO BELIEVE that they are the DEBTORS.” – Jack Smith.
“So what is the PURPOSE of the government and the Bankers in SETTING THIS SCAM up? TO
CONFUSE YOU! That is what BABYLON is, that is EXACTLY what they do, they get you in a
STATE OF CONFUSION so that you will PLAY YOUR ROLE (AS DEBTOR) and NOT understand
what is really happening.” – Jack Smith.
“Where is the TRADE-OFF between SECURITY and LIBERTY? Well LIBERTY is a TRAIT that
follows PEOPLE. Now SECURITY could follow EITHER the people or CORPORATE INTERESTS.
So the question is when a system is dealing with SECURITY, Is the security decision based on
securitizing the people or is it that the security that the SYSTEM is talking about maintaining the
INTEGRITY of the system and to heck with the people?” – Jack Smith.
No bank will loan ANY PERSON any thing without someone coming in and leaving a
COMMERCIAL DOCUMENT with the bank which is basically going to be a FINANCE
STATEMENT. So the “MONEY” is CREATED by the TRUSTEE FIDUCIARY (YOU) for the
PERSON (Legal Fiction) by way of a signature on a NOTE whereby the PERSON (Fiction Strawman)
promises to repay it. That is the FOUNDATION for the “Money” of a Bank Loan.” – Jack Smith.
In context of COMMERCE what that means is that we take their DISHONOUR, the CONVERSION
OF LIABILITY and we use that as the MONETARY EXPANSION to fund an instrument to
Treasury to have Treasury SECURE or SEIZE the Fugitive or STOLEN funds from the presenters
bond.
How can a DISHONOUR be funds? Well a dishonour is NOTHING MORE than a LIABILITY and
it is CERTIFIED as a liability. It is CLEAR that in the system of COMMERCE, the system of
BANKRUPTCY in which we NOW exist in, a commercial system based upon an ABSENCE of
tangible assets ( SUBSTANCE MONEY) AND uses as its monetary curriculum LIABILITY!
LIABILITY IS THE CURRICULUM OF PAYMENT! A FICTIONAL ASSET IN THE SYSTEM.
The liability of a DISHONOUR is in theory the same as payment of the instrument of which the
dishonour is DULY NOTED.
If you pay Federal Reserve notes to someone, $100 dollars and they send it back to you and say “I’m
sorry we only accept cheques” they have CONVERTED THE LIABILITY into FUNDS that they
have to then apply against the account. I paid YOU the $100, you REJECTED IT, YOU are now
HOLDING THE LIABILITY – ergo you’re holding the funds to SETTLE THAT ACCOUNT, It is
now a DONE DEAL! That is why the funds can be used to FUND a payment instrument to the
Secretary of the Treasury!” Dr Sam Kennedy
You can CHOOSE TO “DEFEND” yourself and TELL the judge what the law is, BUT I don’t find
ANY OF THAT in the Scriptures.” – Sam Davis
'Pick a PATH, that's what I tell everybody and STAY on the PATH. Have a BELIEF SYSTEM
and LIVE your belief system. - Sam Davis
GOING TO PEACE is the ONLY way to get your remedy, because what SOLUTION does an argument
or even "DEFENDING" yourself bring?
JACK Why does it belong to them? Who got the name? Who originally acquired the name?
PARTICIPANT the Government!
JACK The baby at birth, the parents gave him a name right?
PARTICIPANT True!
JACK And then the parents went out and DISCLOSED (confidentially Sensitive Information) that name to
the government and put it on a contract for an offering and they’re the HOLDER of the name now! Once
they’re the HOLDER of the name they have got rights in the name. So how did they get the name?
PARTICIPANT The parents gave it away!
JACK So now they’re the HOLDER of the name. Ok had the parents NEVER given the name to them they
would have no acquired interest.
Remember in the Old Testament there was a big discussion in the land of Israel about what happened when the
King decided to go out and number his people, then he would go out in the census and enroll his people. What
happened when the King enrolled the people?
PARTICIPANT He taxed them!
JACK Why did he do that?
PARTICIPANT Because they gave TITLE OF THEIR NAME!
JACK Because giving OVER the name gave a RIGHT to the King as a Corporate government and for people to
reacquire their freedom, what did they have to go ahead and do?
BUY IT BACK and give something to the “King” to get the RELEASE!
DWELLING DICTIONARY
Howard Griswold claims that a "dwelling" is a commercial place of business and therefore we
have been duped into registering our private property in their system as commercial, which is
fraud on their part because there is no category in their system for registering private
property, such as our private house, our private personal motorised transport etc. Trev A.
ON dvelja
Therefore IS Dwelling on the land known to the state commercial? NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED!
We the People are getting mighty educated these days. We tracked down the original 13th Amendment
to the Constitution - you know, the one you started the War of 1812 over so you could burn the copies
– and it says you Esquires are not allowed to have a title of nobility AND
hold public office in America. Up until now, you have been getting away with it.
We learned that the BAR originates in the Crown Temple in London, England. Therefore, your oath to
the BAR means you are not Americans anymore but agents for a foreign power. You have no
citizenship. You claim to have licenses to practice law. As a matter of fact there is no such thing as a
license to practice law. We searched in the statutes, codes, rules and regulations for every state and also
their respective secretaries of state and supreme courts. No authorization for the "license to practice
law" exists anywhere. That means every one of you is unauthorized and illegal in the Republic. JOHN
HENRY DOE, ESQUIRE is a fiction that exists only on paper.
What you do have is a BAR card that simply authorizes you to use the statutes, codes, rules and
regulations, which are all copyrighted. We can't help but notice that all of the law you use is
copyrighted, so the People can't use it without using you. People, how well are you doing with these
laws? It wasn't easy since you have us hanging upside down looking in the mirror trying to read the
newspaper, but we figured out that statutes, codes, rules and regulations are not
law but abrogation’s of the law. Abrogate means "to abolish by authoritative action: ANNUL".
Applying the force of deadly violence, you annulled the real Law and replaced it with colour of law.
Colour of law is a false flag, a pirate flag. You're all a bunch of actors. No license and no law, either.
We counted the number of statutes, codes, rules and regulations that you created, with the intelligence
endowed by your Creator, to use against us. There are many more than 60 million statutes, codes, rules
and regulations, certainly more than all of you BAR attorneys put together can keep track of without
plenty of software, quarterly updates, and teams of legal researchers - and, voila! You have billing!
You write statutes, codes, rules and regulations at the behest of the putrefying corrupt Chosen Masters,
the ancient hate-driven cult within a hate-driven racist sect that are the tiresome
take-over-the-world crowd and the blueprint for criminality. The beasts of this world have more honour
than you. You herd the People you have defrauded into the system of the Matrix like so many cattle, to
be processed, robbed of their freedom, families and property, experimented upon with drug sorcery,
and all too often killed.
You do this because the BAR Association is a hate-driven money cult. Your masters reward you with
obscene hourly rates for the building of your personal empires. You are so far gone from the sight of
God that you think you have the authority to write rules to justify torturing your fellow beings. You
have much blood on your hands.
And your "noble cause" is what? Why, the U.S. bankruptcy is your noble cause, your reason for
In fact all so-called governing bodies in the U.S. are bankrupt corporations telescoping from one to the
other, back and forth between federal-state-county-municipal, due to the Federal Project of Credit. The
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a bankrupt corporation and does
not exist. Your law firm is bankrupt. There is no money. We have no law because we have no money.
Whether or whether not you BAR attorneys swore a secret oath to administer the U.S. bankruptcy, the
bankruptcy is in each and every letter you send, every form you submit, every court pleading you file,
every plea bargain you negotiate. It is a fact of your every professional thought, besides billing. "Law"
has nothing to do with it.
At this point you attorneys have made your true function patently obvious. "Attorning" means to take
all of the property of the People and give it to the Chosen Masters. Well, your masters' day is over. Oh,
it may seem that they are consolidating their control of all the Earth, therefore assuring your positions
as their agents for profit and mayhem; but always profit; but we continue to expose the Chosen Masters
in this forum and many others, and we are getting quite ready to jam their signals, crash their programs
and round them up. Guess where we are going to put the Chosen Masters!
You are being destroyed by leaks from within. From the 13 European families of banking perversion to
the Everytown, USA municipal traffic court judge (who would not be caught dead retiring with less
than $30 million of the People's money) and the entire Satanist racketeering extortionist blackmailing
paedophile warmongering purveyors of human flesh in between, the Chosen Masters are finished.
Some of you attorneys may be hearing the jungle drums and growing uneasy, but most of you are
100% in your ego at all times and proud of being arrogant. Your arrogance may interfere with your
understanding of this message, but check it out, because now it is your turn to "understand" something.
The jig is up. The truth herein is ugly, but we believe Americans are very angry about the truth to date
and that they are ready to hear more. Many will even act on it according to their conscience.
Just when we thought your deeds could not possibly get more hideous, we discovered that you create
commercial paper for each inmate in prison and put a price on him and hypothecate that price many
times. Correctional Corporation of America (Nashville, Tennessee) creates the bonds, and Lehman
Brothers underwrites those bonds for being bought and sold on the world financial markets. The
Chosen Masters cut you in on the deals and you all take profits from this. We are enraged to know that
U.S. corporations are being funded by our brothers and sisters who were busted for pot or for not
having a current driver's license. You BAR attorneys created crimes out of nothing and wrote the rules
for this heinous and sickening theft of the People's energy, all for administering the U.S. bankruptcy
and your own unjust enrichment. We the People, the ones in whom the power is truly vested, are
putting an end to your trafficking in human flesh and spirit.
We used to have common law courts in this country. In common law, unless a living being has been
injured or property loss has occurred there has been no crime. We also found out that you BAR
attorneys raised the level of the Sea on paper so that it "covers" the land, thereby fraudulently
subjecting us to admiralty/maritime law, to the Law of the Sea, to piracy. A cop pulling us over is an
act of piracy. It is a kidnapping. That's a pirate flag he's flying, so cops reading this take heed, for the
Chosen Masters put you where the rubber meets the road. Get this through your heads now: codes do
KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 40 of 43
not apply to the People, only to the corporation for which they were written, and that means you, and it
means you are nothing more than corporate thugs. Some of you became cops in order to get respect.
But we have been giving you not respect but fear, and people can overcome their fears. We have a
God-given right to defend our property and ourselves. Just keep it up, and the survivors of you cops
will yourselves become defendants.
The Chosen Masters have decreed that there are too many of us, so you BAR attorneys make it "legal"
on paper for vile toadies of the Chosen Masters to poison us and the entire Earth through the food, air,
water, and land, and when we sicken, to force dangerous drugs upon us, and when we die, our former
employers receive death benefits$$$$$$ on secret, illegal life insurance policies on us,
unjustly enriching a variety of corporations so that the Chosen Masters may take profits. You (and the
cops) will answer to the People in the lawful courts we establish and you must answer to your families,
friends, neighbours and all whom you sold out and sold. Just about everyone - except Freemasons of
course - has been to traffic court nowadays. What did you think was going to happen?
You BAR attorneys are the original back-door men, the ones in the back room, failing to adjust the
accounts. You never pay your bills. Once you take a case you are the holder of the account for the case.
This means, under Public Law 73-10 wherein all crimes are commercial crimes, and under Public
Policy, that you must adjust the account to offset the liability for closure and settlement. You always
fail to make the ledger entry - there is NO money and the People are exempt from levy - so you
attorneys never pay your bills. You impose the charges upon us and put us in prison instead.
You get paid whether you "win" your case or not, and the judicial system enforces the payment of your
fees. This is conclusive proof of the criminality inherent in the U.S. judicial system. What else is a
criminal but someone in possession of a valuable commodity – human energy - that was acquired
without exchanging something else of value for it?
Well, it is painfully obvious to the People that those are not our courts and we will never get justice in
them. We are going to do away with them and you. Don't look now, but persons in positions of
authority are going to seize the reins. Even now we are turning the tide for a permanent return to a
constitutional form of government. The People will no longer tolerate the lies, the corruption and death
that are your daily bread.
You BAR attorneys are all drunkards drunk on debt, chasing Federal Reserve Notes which are debt
notes and debt (death). You have made it illegal for the People to get out of debt! You put every man,
woman and child under the probate statutes and made us into corporate fictions so you could create
life-destroying industries such as taxation and the judicial system. You attorneys are harming the
entire world, and you cannot make it clearer that you are anti-Life. Through trickery and the deceitful
use of language, you would reduce our lives to nothing more than a series of commercial transactions.
We who now must pursue such life-diminishing goals as "getting out of debt" or "making the rent" or
"paying the bills" - we demand that the BAR stand down and stand aside, now, and make way for the
true Law. For starters, the People are exempt from levy. In common law there is only two laws: do not
harm another living being, and honour all of your contracts. But then there is really only one Law: do
unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Speaking of "personal debt", we learned from our research that the People, the living men and women
of this land and all the lands, are the source of all pretend money; i.e., "credit"; i.e., "commercial
credit". So-called credit does not exist until We create it. We living Beings of Light are the source of all
the energy that is expressed as "credit". Thus, the People can never be debtors, and you attorneys have
KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 41 of 43
slandered our names in your collection letters. We will make claims against you for the slander of your
deceit, so EXPERIAN, TRANS UNION, EQUIFAX, take note. Your BAR attorneys will not be able to
save you. EXPERIAN, TRANS UNION and EQUIFAX are
bankrupt corporations. Yes, People? in this the Bizarre world the credit reporting agencies are
insolvent.
We recently heard that the authorities will start to confiscate our gold fillings and gold teeth. (This is
for paying interest on the U.S. bankruptcy, folks.) Attention municipal, county, state, and federal,
United Nations Chosen Masters/Powers in Charge: We will not tolerate it. We denounce your
obscenely unjust and unlawful codes and refuse to obey them. We hereby declare your illegal statutes,
codes, rules and regulations to be null and void and of no further effect. You can take my drivers
license and shove it!
You are parasites. You create no value. You bring nothing to the table. All of the invisible so-called
contracts by which you think you have us in a chokehold are null and void for lack of consideration,
lack of full disclosure, for threats, duress and coercion in the formation of the contracts, and for being
unconscionable. You ain't got nothing'!
We the People demand forgiveness of all the debt. We demand the restoration of money of substance,
backed by gold and silver. We demand our money back for all the illegal income tax on our labour that
you converted (stole and gave to a foreign corporation; i.e., the Federal Reserve's collection agency
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE - also a bankrupt corporation). We demand the return of all the
money you defrauded us out of for your cash cow Social Security Ponzi
scheme.
We demand our money back for all of those bull##### illegal parking tickets and illegal court cases.
Inasmuch as those funds are collected by corporate thugs and therefore illegal, the funds cannot be
added to municipal budget so therefore the People's property goes straight into the judge's retirement
fund. We demand that you makereparations to us for having defrauded and enslaved us.
We learned that our real government is in the county. In the Republic, where all of our rights are intact,
our highest elected official is the county sheriff. We will restore lawful government first at home, in
our counties. Generals and Provost Marshals, duty calls like never before, and we are taking names. Do
your duty and put the county sheriffs under arrest, or we will!
We will open the prison doors and send home everyone busted for pot and every other innocent victim
of your unlawful codes. They will go home with all of their property restored to them plus reparations
and public apologies. A goodly portion of those reparations will come from your pocket, Mr. BAR
Attorney. We will return back to the prisons all of the real criminals routinely set loose into our
communities by the paedophilic treasonous "authorities", and many, many of you BAR attorneys will
join them for your crimes.
Judges merit a special note. Municipal traffic court, bankruptcy court, probate court, federal court,
makes no difference, you are the most venal and rapacious type of creature imaginable. We have
KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 42 of 43
awakened to the real state of affairs: that we live in the Bizarre world. Thus it should come as no
surprise that the man in the black dress, supposedly learned in the "law", is in reality an extortionist, a
career criminal, the most unlawful creature on Earth. The judge's bench ("bank") is a moveable feast,
his black robes highly appropriate for a bird of carrion.
You are all in breach of the Covenant, in breach of the Trust, in breach of the Contract. In your souls
and in commerce, you are in dishonour. Your rights are forfeit and your property is forfeit -
trust or no trust.
We the People who are Beings of Light are taking responsibility and taking over. We are creating a
world without parasites. Even as you read this we are ... phasing you out. You cannot turn back this
tide. Members of the BAR, here are your choices: Come into the Light, or go into the Light. You very
dark ones face un-creation or the Hell planet. You will not be missed.
P.S. for the People: BAR Attorneys passed a very sneaky law in 1980 that says they represent both
sides in a case! But it is a felony for an attorney to take money from someone he does not represent. So
if an attorney bothers you, tell him he's fired! Enjoy!