Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2018
Judgment Delivered on 21.12.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3437 of 2016
Divya Pharmacy
………….Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
` ……...Respondents
Present : Mr. R. Parthasarthy, Mr. P.R. Mullick, Mr. Anil Datt,
Mr. Sudarshan Singh and Mr. Sahil Mullick, Advocates for
the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Assistant Solicitor General of India
with Mr. V.K. Kaparwan, Central Government Standing
Counsel for respondent no. 1.
Mr. M.C. Pandey, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Addl. C.S.C. for the State/respondent
no. 4.
Mr. Ritwik Dutta and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocates for
respondent no. 2.
Mr. Alok Mahra, Advocate for respondent no. 3.
(b)…
(c) “biological resources” means plants,
animals and micro-organisms or parts
thereof, their genetic material and by-
products (excluding value added
products) with actual or potential use or
value but does not include human
genetic material;”
1. www.biodiversity-z.org
2. www.biodiversity-z.org
22
“ACCESS TO TRADITIONAL
KNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATED WITH
GENETIC RESOURCES
32
“TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
ASSOCIATED WITH GENETIC
RESOURCES
69.
[[ Article 21 then speaks of awareness raising of
the “indigenous and local communities”. It reads as
under:
35
“AWARENESS-RAISING
7
36
Avneet/