Water Supply Report

Water Supply and Wastewater Engineering Lab 2015-En-11
Back Ground
The area given in map is H.B.F.C Officers Co-operative Housing Society Lahore
Cant. It is located adjacent to D.H.A phase 5& Ring Road. There is underground
system of electricity showing it is developed area.
 Topography and Climate
The area is flat. Height of area is 100m above Mean Sea Level. The alluvial beds
are hard and sandy with inner beds of clay and layers of sand. It have extreme
climate hot summer, cold winter.
 Socioeconomic Culture
The economic state of the society is very good. The elite high class people are
living there. The current Population estimation is growing with growth rate
almost 2 %.
Figure 1. H.B.F.C Housing Society

Purpose
The purpose is to provide Water Supply Network to the H.B.F.C. Co-Operative
Housing society.
Water Supply System
A water supply system or water supply network is a system of engineered
hydrologic and hydraulic components which provide water supply.
To supply safe and wholesome water to consumers.
To supply water in sufficient quantities.
To supply water at convenient points and timings.
To supply water at reasonable cost to the users.
To encourage personal and house hold cleanliness of users.
Water Source
As this area is situated in Lahore and Ground Water is used as source of water
supply due to following reasons
 Water is sweet in taste
 Within extractable limits
 Requires no treatment except disinfection
To extract the ground water, installation of tube wells/deep wells is done by WASA
for water supply.
Design Criteria
Design criteria is a document that provides suitable values of different design
parameters that must be adopted during the design process.
Design criteria is based upon following parameters
 Scientific knowledge
 Past experience of service providers
 Changes in summer s life styles and habits.
 New emerging technologies.
Design Engineers are suggested to obtain and follow Local Design Criteria for
public water supply for required area. In Pakistan, Public Health Engineering
Department (PHED) and Water and Sanitation Agency (WASA) provide Design
Criteria. We mostly obey the local design criteria provided by PHED.
Design of Water Supply System

Design of Water Supply System depend upon the following Factors:
 Design Period Adopted for Water Supply
 Selection of per capita water consumption (WC)
 Future population forecast
Design Period Adopted for Water Supply

Design Period is defined as number of years in future for which a proposed facility
would meet the requirement of a community.
The design period for tube well is selected 25 years in case of Direct Pumping and
pumping with Storage. The shorter design period is selected due to following
reasons:
The tube well can easily install (ease of extension) in 2-3 months and its first cost
is low as compared to dams that’s why we take its shorter design period.
Time period of 25 years is greater than the 2-3 months lead time (time from the
start of the project to its completion).
Selection of per capita water consumption (WC)
Per Capita Water Consumption is defined as the amount of water used by a
person on daily basis. It usually ranges from 45 to 650 LPCD.
For residential Usage
The water consumed by a person is 300 LPCD.
RESIDENTIAL USEAGE LPCD (Liter per Capita Per

Day)
Toilet 100
Bath 60
Kitchen 40
Laundry 20
Cooking 35
Cleaning of Cars and 25
house
Gardening 20
Total 300
For Commercial Purposes

For Commercial Purposes per capita water demand is 80 LPCD because each
person requires to meet his daily requirement (for drinking, toilet and washing of
shops).
For Mosque
For Mosque per capita water demand is 25 Liters per nimazi per day because each
nimazi requires 5 liters foe each prayer.
For School
For School per capita water demand is 35 Liters per student per day to fulfil daily
requirement of a student (Drinking and Toilet).
For Parks
Depending on area parks requires 350 Liter/Day for watering the plants.
Population Projection
Design of water supply scheme is based on the population projection of a city for
design period. As the population increases day by day that’s why we take into
consideration the population at the end of design period.
1. Any underestimate value makes system inadequate for the purpose intended
2. Overestimate will make the project costly.
Present population
In 2 canal house people are living = 10 persons
Total 2 Canal houses = 57 Houses
Total People living in 2 Canal houses = 10 × 57
Total People living in 2 Canal houses = 570 Persons
In 1 canal house people are living = 6 persons
Total 1 Canal houses = 591 Houses
Total People living in 1 Canal houses = 6 × 591persons
Total People living in 1 Canal houses = 3564 Persons
In 10 Marla house people are living = 5 Persons

Total 10 Marla houses = 22 Houses
Total People living in 10 Marla houses = 5 × 22
Total People living in 10 Marla houses = 110 Persons
In 5 Marla house people are living = 3 persons
Total 5 Marla houses = 15 Houses
Total People living in 5 Marla houses= 3 × 15 persons
Total People living in 5 Marla houses= 45 persons
Total people Living in H.B.F.C Co-Operative Housing Society = 570 + 3564 + 110 +
45
Total people Living in H.B.F.C Co-Operative Housing Society = 4172 Persons
Future Population
N = 25
X = 1.5 % OR 0.015
Present Population=4172 Persons
N
Estimated Future Population=Present Population×(1+ x )
Estimated Future Population=4172×(1+0.015)25

Estimated Future Population=6845 Persons
According to Estimated Future Population we have to assume population

accordingly at the end of design period in order.
The assumptions are according to estimated future population for desired design
period:
Allotment Assumed Population

5 Marla Plot 5
10 Marla Plot 8
1 kanal Plot 10
2 kanal Plot 12
Parks 5 as worker
Mosque 250
Commercial 40 as worker
School 300
Dispensary 5 as staff
Parking 5 as worker
Sites 10 as worker
Graveyard 4 as worker
Petrol pump 10 as worker
Public place 50 as visitors
Design Considerations
The design requirements of water distribution system is to satisfied
1. Total water demand
2. The minimum residual pressure

Total water demand
Average water Demand
The total volume of water delivered to the system. The average use in a single day
expressed in Liters per day.
Qavg=¿ 2182600 Liters/Day
Qavg=25.26 Liters /Sec
Peak Hourly water Demand
The peak consumption during any hour of the year, excluding fire demand, is
called Peak hourly consumption.
It is around 150% of the maximum daily consumption & 225% of the average daily
demand.
Q peak =56.83 Liters/ Sec
Maximum water Demand
It is the maximum water consumption during any one day in the year.
It is about 150 to 180% of average day consumption.
Qmax =37.89 Liters /sec
Minimum Residual Head in Pipes

Minimum Residual Head is lowest pressure at the farthest point in Water
Distribution System under maximum demand.
According to WASA Design criteria Residual head value must lie between 14m to
35m.
The Minimum Residual Head value is maintained 20-21m in the water supply
network of above area so that water can reach to end consumer with sufficient
pressure and to meet the most critical demand node in water distribution system
under maximum demand.
If pressure is below the minimum residual pressure or negative then require large
diameter of pipe and hence flow of water decreases that’s why we have to
maintain the minimum residual pressure.
Type of Pipes used in water distribution system

Type of Pipe selected for the distribution system is Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC). It is
used due to following reasons:
1. Cheap
2. Easy to install
3. Have small pumping cost
4. Non-corrosive
It mostly use in Water Supply System. It is available in 20mm to 800mm diameter.

It have types due to operating Pressure Rating of B type (200ft), C type (300ft), D
type (400ft) and E type (500ft).
B type PVC is suggested to use because it can operate at 60.97m and our
operating pressure is 21 m and it is within this pressure range of pipe B that’s why
B class Pipe is suggested to be chosen and no need of C, D and E type of PVC pipe.
Previously Asbestos pipe was frequently used in water Supply System having high
strength and offering low resistance toward flow but it is now banned due to
drastic cancer causing reasons.
Design Procedure for EPA.Net Software

Procedure
1. Draw the layout of distribution system.
2. Assign plots to each node.

3. Find out the design population to be served.
4. Adopt suitable per capita water consumption from design criteria.
5. Calculate the average consumption at each node.

6. Assign water demands to nodes (nodal demand). This should be realistic as
possible.
 Maximum Demand in case of Pumping with Storage.
 Peak demand in case of Direct Pumping.
7. Start with a trial diameter of distribution network.
8. Run the program to see whether requirement of terminal head is met in the
entire Distribution System.
9. If terminal head is less than required, increase pipe diameter and vice versa.
10.Measure the length of each pipe.
Figure 2. Pumping With Storage
Figure 3. Direct Pumping

Design of Tube Well, Pump and OHR (Overhead Reservoir)

No of Reservoirs
L
Maximum Daily Demand=37.89
sec
37.89 m3
Maximum Daily Demand=
1000 sec
37.89
Maximum Daily Demand= × 35.3Cusec
1000
Maximum Daily Demand=1.33 Cusec
PumpingCapacity=1.5 Cusec
Maximum Daily Demand

No of Reservoirs=
PumpingCapacity
1.33Cusec
No of Reservoirs=
1.5Cusec
No of Reservoirs=1
Head of Reservoir
Elevation = 100m
Depth of Ground Water Table = 30.48m
Draw Down = 9.114m
Total Head = Elevation -Depth of Ground water table –Draw down
Total Head = 100m - 30.48m - 9.114m
Total Head = 60.406m
Design of Over Head Reservoir/Tank
Number of OHR=Number of Reservoir

Number of OHR=1
1 m3
Total Storage= × Qavg ( )
6 day
1 m3
Total Storage= × 2182.6( )
6 day
3
m
Total Storage=363.76( )
day
Total Storage
Storage of one OHR=
Number of OHR
3
363.76 m
Storage of one OHR= ( )
1 day
m3
Storage of one OHR=363.76 ( )
day
Pump Running Time=8 hours
Capacity of one OHR=V ( m3 )=Storage of one OHR × Running Time
m3 8
Capacity of one OHR=V ( m 3 )=363.76 ( )× day
day 24
Capacity of one OHR=V ( m 3 )=121.25 m 3
Usually Depth of OHR=8 ft−10 ft

Let Depth of OHR=3 m
Volume
Area=
Depth
121.25 m3
Area=
3m
2
Area=40.41 m
2
πd
Area=
4
A×4
Diameter=√
π
40.41× 4
Diameter=√
3.1415
Diameter=7.17 m
Elevation of OHR=20 m
Total Elevation of OHR=Ground Level+ Elevation of OHR
Total Elevation of OHR=100 m+20 m
Total Elevation of OHR=120 m
Minimum level=0 m
Initial level=1m
Maximumlevel=2.6 m
Design of Pump
Pump Capacity=1.5Cusec
Head of Pump
Depth of Ground water table = 30.48 m

Draw down = 9.114 m
Difference in elevation of ground & OHR = 20 m
Head loss = 3.112 m
Head=Depth of Ground Water Table+ Draw Down+ Difference∈the elevation of Ground∧OHR+ Head Loss
Head=30.48 m+9.114 m+20 m+ 3.112m
Head=62.706 m
Flow of Pump
Flow of Pump=Pumping Capacity ×28.32
L
Flow of Pump=1.5× 28.32( )
sec
L
Flow of Pump=42.48( )
sec
Pumping Without Storage
No of Reservoirs
L
Peak Hourly Demand=56.83
sec
3
56.83 m
Peak Hourly Demand=
1000 sec
56.83
Peak Hourly Demand= ×35.3 Cusec
1000
Peak Hourly Demand=2 Cusec
PumpingCapacity=2 Cusec
Peak Hourly Demand

No of Reservoirs=
Pumping Capacity
2Cusec
No of Reservoirs=
2Cusec
No of Reservoirs=1
Head of Reservoir
Elevation = 100m
Depth of Ground Water Table = 30.48m
Draw Down = 9.114m
Total Head = Elevation -Depth of Ground water table –Draw down
Total Head = 100m - 30.48m - 9.114m
Total Head = 60.406m
Design of Pump
Pump Capacity=2Cusec
Head of Pump
Depth of Ground water table = 30.48 m
Draw down = 9.114 m
Increment in head= 5 m
Head loss = 3.112 m
Head=Depth of Ground Water Table+ Draw Down+ Head Loss + Increment in head= 5
m
Head=30.48 m+9.114 m+3.112 m+ 5 m
Head=47.706 m
Flow of Pump
Flow of Pump=Pumping Capacity ×28.32
L
Flow of Pump=2× 28.32( )
sec
L
Flow of Pump=56.64( )
sec
Pumping with Storage

Page 1 11/11/2017 11:54:07 PM
**********************************************************************
* E P A N E T *
* Hydraulic and Water Quality *
* Analysis for Pipe Networks *
* Version 2.0 *
**********************************************************************
Input File: 2015-EN-11.net
Link - Node Table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Link Start End Length Diameter
ID Node Node m mm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 2 15 150
2 2 4 25 150
3 3 4 23 150
4 4 6 16 150
5 5 6 13 100
6 7 8 40 150
7 8 6 10 150
8 8 9 8 150
9 9 10 53 150
10 5 16 35 150
11 14 15 6 150
12 15 16 7 150
13 16 17 13 150
14 6 17 35 150
15 9 11 16 150
16 11 18 1.7 150
17 10 12 18 150
18 12 19 18 150
19 13 20 19 150
20 17 18 18 225
21 18 19 55 225
22 19 20 15 150
23 20 21 13 150
24 21 22 21 150
25 22 23 15 150
26 15 28 36 150
27 17 24 19 225
28 24 29 19 225
29 29 28 20 150
30 29 30 80 225
31 25 30 19 225
33 21 31 35 150
35 31 43 37 225
36 28 38 36 150
37 38 39 20 150
38 34 39 18 225
39 39 40 27 225
Page 2
Link - Node Table: (continued)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID Node Node m mm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 29 34 18 225
41 34 35 80 225
42 30 35 18 225
43 35 42 19 225
44 40 41 33 225
45 41 42 21 225
46 22 26 20 150
47 26 27 16 150
48 26 32 17 150
49 32 33 32 225
50 32 36 18 225
51 36 44 20 300
52 37 36 43 300
53 43 44 22 300
54 44 45 53 300
55 42 43 22 225
56 41 50 32 150
57 40 49 18 150
58 42 52 40 225
59 52 51 13 150
60 52 60 18 150
61 52 53 20 150
62 43 53 40 300
63 53 61 20 225
64 53 63 70 300
65 44 54 18 300
66 54 57 8 300
67 54 55 40 300
68 57 58 32 300
69 55 58 20 300
70 48 47 15 50
71 47 46 10 300
72 45 46 18 300
73 46 56 22 300
74 56 55 18 300
75 56 59 25 300
76 59 58 18 300
77 59 63 23 300
78 63 62 20 225
79 62 61 70 225
80 12 11 55 150
81 25 24 80 225
34 65 57 30 300
32 64 65 #N/A #N/A Pump
Page 3
Energy Usage:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usage Avg. Kw-hr Avg. Peak Cost
Pump Factor Effic. /m3 Kw Kw /day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
32 100.00 75.00 0.22 19.96 19.96 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge: 0.00
Total Cost: 0.00
Node Results:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Demand Head Pressure Quality
ID LPS m m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.21 120.78 20.78 0.00
2 0.49 120.78 20.78 0.00
3 0.28 120.78 20.78 0.00
4 0.14 120.78 20.78 0.00
5 0.15 120.78 20.78 0.00
6 0.42 120.78 20.78 0.00
7 0.21 120.78 20.78 0.00
8 0.14 120.78 20.78 0.00
9 0.52 120.78 20.78 0.00
10 0.49 120.78 20.78 0.00
11 0.68 120.78 20.78 0.00
12 0.52 120.78 20.78 0.00
13 0.24 120.79 20.79 0.00
14 0.11 120.78 20.78 0.00
15 0.38 120.78 20.78 0.00
16 0.14 120.78 20.78 0.00
17 0.52 120.78 20.78 0.00
18 0.63 120.78 20.78 0.00
19 0.46 120.78 20.78 0.00
20 0.18 120.79 20.79 0.00
21 0.38 120.79 20.79 0.00
22 0.40 120.79 20.79 0.00
23 0.24 120.79 20.79 0.00
24 0.73 120.78 20.78 0.00
25 0.69 120.78 20.78 0.00
26 0.21 120.80 20.80 0.00
27 0.28 120.80 20.80 0.00
28 0.66 120.78 20.78 0.00
29 0.77 120.78 20.78 0.00
30 0.72 120.78 20.78 0.00
31 0.44 120.80 20.80 0.00
32 0.25 120.80 20.80 0.00
33 0.35 120.80 20.80 0.00
34 0.76 120.78 20.78 0.00
35 0.66 120.78 20.78 0.00
36 0.52 120.80 20.80 0.00
37 0.43 120.80 20.80 0.00
Page 4
Node Results: (continued)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
38 0.36 120.78 20.78 0.00
39 0.37 120.78 20.78 0.00
40 0.40 120.78 20.78 0.00
41 0.30 120.79 20.79 0.00
42 0.48 120.79 20.79 0.00
43 0.25 120.80 20.80 0.00
44 0.52 120.80 20.80 0.00
45 0.63 120.81 20.81 0.00
46 0.28 120.81 20.81 0.00
47 0.11 120.81 20.81 0.00
48 0.17 120.80 20.80 0.00
49 0.20 120.78 20.78 0.00
50 0.28 120.79 20.79 0.00
51 0.21 120.79 20.79 0.00
52 0.31 120.79 20.79 0.00
53 0.81 120.80 20.80 0.00
54 0.28 120.81 20.81 0.00
55 0.40 120.81 20.81 0.00
56 0.76 120.81 20.81 0.00
57 0.18 120.81 20.81 0.00
58 0.35 120.81 20.81 0.00
59 0.22 120.81 20.81 0.00
60 0.50 120.79 20.79 0.00
61 0.43 120.80 20.80 0.00
62 0.49 120.80 20.80 0.00
63 0.63 120.80 20.80 0.00
65 0.00 120.84 120.84 0.00
64 -25.27 60.40 0.00 0.00 Reservoir
Link Results:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Link Flow Velocity head loss Status
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 -0.21 0.01 0.00 Open
2 -0.69 0.04 0.03 Open
3 -0.28 0.02 0.01 Open
4 -1.11 0.06 0.07 Open
5 0.37 0.05 0.07 Open
6 -0.21 0.01 0.00 Open
7 0.27 0.02 0.00 Open
8 -0.62 0.03 0.02 Open
9 -0.19 0.01 0.00 Open
10 -0.52 0.03 0.02 Open
11 -0.11 0.01 0.00 Open
12 0.29 0.02 0.01 Open
13 -0.37 0.02 0.01 Open
Page 5
Link Results: (continued)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
14 -0.88 0.05 0.05 Open
15 -0.94 0.05 0.05 Open
16 -1.83 0.10 0.18 Open
17 -0.68 0.04 0.03 Open
18 -1.00 0.06 0.06 Open
19 -0.24 0.01 0.00 Open
20 1.32 0.03 0.01 Open
21 -1.14 0.03 0.01 Open
22 -2.59 0.15 0.35 Open
23 -3.01 0.17 0.47 Open
24 -1.30 0.07 0.10 Open
25 0.24 0.01 0.00 Open
26 -0.78 0.04 0.04 Open
27 -3.10 0.08 0.07 Open
28 -2.42 0.06 0.04 Open
29 0.81 0.05 0.04 Open
30 -1.28 0.03 0.01 Open
31 -2.10 0.05 0.03 Open
33 -2.08 0.12 0.24 Open
35 -2.52 0.06 0.05 Open
36 -0.63 0.04 0.03 Open
37 -1.00 0.06 0.06 Open
38 -1.61 0.04 0.02 Open
39 -2.97 0.07 0.06 Open
40 -2.72 0.07 0.05 Open
41 -1.88 0.05 0.03 Open
42 -4.09 0.10 0.11 Open
43 -6.63 0.17 0.28 Open
44 -3.57 0.09 0.09 Open
45 -4.15 0.10 0.12 Open
46 -1.94 0.11 0.21 Open
47 0.28 0.02 0.01 Open
48 -2.42 0.14 0.31 Open
49 0.35 0.01 0.00 Open
50 -3.02 0.08 0.06 Open
51 -3.97 0.06 0.03 Open
52 -0.43 0.01 0.00 Open
53 -9.98 0.14 0.15 Open
54 -2.65 0.04 0.01 Open
55 -9.14 0.23 0.51 Open
56 0.28 0.02 0.01 Open
57 0.20 0.01 0.00 Open
58 -2.11 0.05 0.03 Open
59 0.21 0.01 0.00 Open
60 0.50 0.03 0.02 Open
61 -3.14 0.18 0.50 Open
62 -1.93 0.03 0.01 Open
Page 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
63 -1.24 0.03 0.01 Open
64 -4.64 0.07 0.04 Open
65 -11.83 0.17 0.20 Open
66 -16.17 0.23 0.36 Open
67 4.06 0.06 0.03 Open
68 8.92 0.13 0.12 Open
69 -2.10 0.03 0.01 Open
70 -0.17 0.09 0.50 Open
71 -0.28 0.00 0.00 Open
72 -3.28 0.05 0.02 Open
73 -3.84 0.05 0.02 Open
74 -5.76 0.08 0.05 Open
75 1.16 0.02 0.00 Open
76 -6.48 0.09 0.07 Open
77 7.42 0.11 0.08 Open
78 2.16 0.05 0.03 Open
79 1.68 0.04 0.02 Open
80 -0.21 0.01 0.00 Open
81 1.40 0.04 0.02 Open
34 25.27 0.36 0.82 Open
32 25.27 0.00 -60.44 Open Pump
Direct Pumping Results

Page 1 11/14/2017 10:05:06 PM
**********************************************************************
* E P A N E T *
* Hydraulic and Water Quality *
* Analysis for Pipe Networks *
* Version 2.0 *
**********************************************************************
Input File: 2015-EN-11.net
Link - Node Table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID Node Node m mm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 2 15 100
2 2 4 25 100
3 3 4 23 100
4 4 6 16 100
5 5 6 13 150
6 7 8 40 100
7 8 6 10 150
8 8 9 8 150
9 9 10 53 150
10 5 16 35 150
11 14 15 6 150
12 15 16 7 150
13 16 17 13 150
14 6 17 35 150
15 9 11 16 150
16 11 18 1.7 150
17 10 12 18 150
18 12 19 18 150
19 13 20 19 150
20 17 18 18 225
21 18 19 55 225
22 19 20 15 225
23 20 21 13 225
24 21 22 21 225
25 22 23 15 150
26 15 28 36 150
27 17 24 19 225
28 24 29 19 225
29 29 28 20 150
30 29 30 80 225
31 25 30 19 225
33 21 31 35 150
35 31 43 37 225
36 28 38 36 150
37 38 39 20 225
38 34 39 18 225
39 39 40 27 225
Page 2
Link - Node Table: (continued)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID Node Node m mm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 29 34 18 225
41 34 35 80 225
42 30 35 18 225
43 35 42 19 225
44 40 41 33 225
45 41 42 21 225
46 22 26 20 225
47 26 27 16 225
48 26 32 17 225
49 32 33 32 225
50 32 36 18 225
51 36 44 20 300
52 37 36 43 300
53 43 44 22 300
54 44 45 53 300
55 42 43 22 225
56 41 50 32 225
57 40 49 18 225
58 42 52 40 225
59 52 51 13 225
60 52 60 18 225
61 52 53 20 225
62 43 53 40 300
63 53 61 20 225
64 53 63 70 300
65 44 54 18 300
66 54 57 8 300
67 54 55 40 300
68 57 58 32 300
69 55 58 20 300
70 48 47 15 150
71 47 46 10 300
72 45 46 18 300
73 46 56 22 300
74 56 55 18 300
75 56 59 25 300
76 59 58 18 300
77 59 63 23 300
78 63 62 20 225
79 62 61 70 225
80 12 11 55 150
81 25 24 80 225
34 65 57 30 300
32 64 65 #N/A #N/A Pump
Page 3
Energy Usage:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usage Avg. Kw-hr Avg. Peak Cost
Pump Factor Effic. /m3 Kw Kw /day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
32 100.00 75.00 0.22 19.96 19.96 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge: 0.00
Total Cost: 0.00
Node Results:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.21 120.77 20.77 0.00
2 0.49 120.77 20.77 0.00
3 0.28 120.78 20.78 0.00
4 0.14 120.78 20.78 0.00
5 0.15 120.79 20.79 0.00
6 0.42 120.79 20.79 0.00
7 0.21 120.79 20.79 0.00
8 0.14 120.79 20.79 0.00
9 0.52 120.79 20.79 0.00
10 0.49 120.79 20.79 0.00
11 0.68 120.79 20.79 0.00
12 0.52 120.79 20.79 0.00
13 0.24 120.79 20.79 0.00
14 0.11 120.79 20.79 0.00
15 0.38 120.79 20.79 0.00
16 0.14 120.79 20.79 0.00
17 0.52 120.79 20.79 0.00
18 0.63 120.79 20.79 0.00
19 0.46 120.79 20.79 0.00
20 0.18 120.79 20.79 0.00
21 0.38 120.80 20.80 0.00
22 0.40 120.80 20.80 0.00
23 0.24 120.80 20.80 0.00
24 0.73 120.79 20.79 0.00
25 0.69 120.79 20.79 0.00
26 0.21 120.80 20.80 0.00
27 0.28 120.80 20.80 0.00
28 0.66 120.79 20.79 0.00
29 0.77 120.79 20.79 0.00
30 0.72 120.79 20.79 0.00
31 0.44 120.80 20.80 0.00
32 0.25 120.80 20.80 0.00
33 0.35 120.80 20.80 0.00
34 0.76 120.79 20.79 0.00
35 0.66 120.79 20.79 0.00
36 0.52 120.80 20.80 0.00
37 0.43 120.80 20.80 0.00
Page 4
Node Results: (continued)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
38 0.36 120.79 20.79 0.00
39 0.37 120.79 20.79 0.00
40 0.40 120.79 20.79 0.00
41 0.30 120.79 20.79 0.00
42 0.48 120.80 20.80 0.00
43 0.25 120.80 20.80 0.00
44 0.52 120.80 20.80 0.00
45 0.63 120.81 20.81 0.00
46 0.28 120.81 20.81 0.00
47 0.11 120.81 20.81 0.00
48 0.17 120.81 20.81 0.00
49 0.20 120.79 20.79 0.00
50 0.28 120.79 20.79 0.00
51 0.21 120.80 20.80 0.00
52 0.31 120.80 20.80 0.00
53 0.81 120.80 20.80 0.00
54 0.28 120.81 20.81 0.00
55 0.40 120.81 20.81 0.00
56 0.76 120.81 20.81 0.00
57 0.18 120.81 20.81 0.00
58 0.35 120.81 20.81 0.00
59 0.22 120.81 20.81 0.00
60 0.50 120.80 20.80 0.00
61 0.43 120.80 20.80 0.00
62 0.49 120.80 20.80 0.00
63 0.63 120.80 20.80 0.00
65 0.00 120.84 120.84 0.00
64 -25.27 60.40 0.00 0.00 Reservoir
Link Results:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 -0.21 0.03 0.02 Open
2 -0.69 0.09 0.22 Open
3 -0.28 0.04 0.04 Open
4 -1.11 0.14 0.53 Open
5 0.44 0.02 0.01 Open
6 -0.21 0.03 0.02 Open
7 0.31 0.02 0.01 Open
8 -0.66 0.04 0.03 Open
9 -0.27 0.02 0.01 Open
10 -0.59 0.03 0.02 Open
11 -0.11 0.01 0.00 Open
12 0.07 0.00 0.00 Open
13 -0.65 0.04 0.03 Open
Page 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
14 -0.77 0.04 0.04 Open
15 -0.92 0.05 0.05 Open
16 -1.45 0.08 0.12 Open
17 -0.75 0.04 0.04 Open
18 -1.43 0.08 0.12 Open
19 -0.24 0.01 0.00 Open
20 -0.14 0.00 0.00 Open
21 -2.21 0.06 0.04 Open
22 -4.09 0.10 0.11 Open
23 -4.51 0.11 0.14 Open
24 -3.16 0.08 0.07 Open
25 0.24 0.01 0.00 Open
26 -0.57 0.03 0.02 Open
27 -1.81 0.05 0.03 Open
28 -1.57 0.04 0.02 Open
29 0.58 0.03 0.02 Open
30 -1.00 0.03 0.01 Open
31 -1.66 0.04 0.02 Open
33 -1.73 0.10 0.17 Open
35 -2.17 0.05 0.03 Open
36 -0.64 0.04 0.03 Open
37 -1.01 0.03 0.01 Open
38 -1.09 0.03 0.01 Open
39 -2.47 0.06 0.04 Open
40 -1.93 0.05 0.03 Open
41 -1.60 0.04 0.02 Open
42 -3.38 0.08 0.08 Open
43 -5.63 0.14 0.21 Open
44 -3.06 0.08 0.07 Open
45 -3.64 0.09 0.09 Open
46 -3.79 0.10 0.10 Open
47 0.28 0.01 0.00 Open
48 -4.28 0.11 0.12 Open
49 0.35 0.01 0.00 Open
50 -4.88 0.12 0.16 Open
51 -5.83 0.08 0.05 Open
52 -0.43 0.01 0.00 Open
53 -8.46 0.12 0.11 Open
54 -2.82 0.04 0.01 Open
55 -6.40 0.16 0.26 Open
56 0.28 0.01 0.00 Open
57 0.20 0.01 0.00 Open
58 -3.36 0.08 0.08 Open
59 0.21 0.01 0.00 Open
60 0.50 0.01 0.00 Open
61 -4.38 0.11 0.13 Open
62 -0.35 0.01 0.00 Open
Page 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ID LPS m/s m/km
----------------------------------------------------------------------
63 -1.15 0.03 0.01 Open
64 -4.39 0.06 0.03 Open
65 -11.99 0.17 0.21 Open
66 -16.22 0.23 0.36 Open
67 3.96 0.06 0.03 Open
68 8.87 0.13 0.12 Open
69 -2.15 0.03 0.01 Open
70 -0.17 0.01 0.00 Open
71 -0.28 0.00 0.00 Open
72 -3.45 0.05 0.02 Open
73 -4.01 0.06 0.03 Open
74 -5.70 0.08 0.05 Open
75 0.93 0.01 0.00 Open
76 -6.38 0.09 0.06 Open
77 7.09 0.10 0.08 Open
78 2.07 0.05 0.03 Open
79 1.58 0.04 0.02 Open
80 0.15 0.01 0.00 Open
81 0.97 0.02 0.01 Open
34 25.27 0.36 0.82 Open
32 25.27 0.00 -60.44 Open Pump
Results With discussion

1. We mostly adopt pumping with storage method with intermittent supply of 8
hours because it is efficient and reliable as compare to Direct Pumping.
Why Pumping with Storage is better than the Direct Pumping?
Pumping with storage is better than the direct pumping due to following reasons.
 No doubt capital cost of pumping with storage method is high as compare to
Direct Pumping but it because it is efficient and reliable. Direct Pumping will
have high cost of electricity to operate pumps.
 It require few pump to deal with the constant flow rates while Direct pumping
has several pumps to deal varying demand of community.
 In case of Direct Pumping we have to bear high electricity cost in order to
operate several pumps.
 There is no storage of water in Direct Pumping that’s why we cannot deal with
firefighting demands.
 Direct pumping requires constant attendance of operators while Pumping with
storage do not require Constant attendance.
 In case of Power/tube well shut down there is no supply to community due to
no storage while in pumping with storage we the water is supplied to
community at constant rates.
 In case of Pumping with storage excess water pumped during periods of low
consumption stored in Overhead Reservoir and High consumption periods
water drawn out to be pumped while, in Direct Pumping cannot perform this
phenomenon.
 Pumping with storage is economical as pumping rate is set at maximum daily
instead of peak hourly flow in Direct Pumping.
2. The Minimum Residual Head value is maintained 20-21m in the water supply
network of above area so that water can reach to end consumer with sufficient
pressure and to meet the most critical demand node in water distribution
system under maximum demand.
If pressure is below the minimum residual pressure or negative then require
large diameter of pipe and hence flow of water decreases that’s why we have
to maintain the minimum residual pressure.
3. Provision of Air Valves is necessary after every 100-150m, Sluice Valves are
necessary on the suction of the pump.
Bill of Quantities (BOQ) For Pumping With Storage
Pressure Pipe
Sizes(mm) quantity unit rate total
100 119 m 22 2618
150 410 m 32 13120
225 918 m 36 33048
300 592 m 44 26048
Providing cutting, jointing, testing and disinfection or equivalent make the cost of pipe
material
100 300 m 93.20 27960
150 500 m 145.00 72500
225 650 m 235.85 153302.5
300 450 m 276.90 124605
Earth worth excavation in open cutting up to 1.5m to 3m for roads, streets including
Backfilling & disposal of excavated material for ordinary soil
100 47.6 m3 201.05 286496.25
150 410.6 m3 201.05 82551.13
225 550.8 m3 201.05 110738
300 355.2 m3 201.05 71412.96
Storage tank of height 20m
Storage tank of 9.44 gallon 215/gallon 2029.6

height 20m
Deep well turbine pump B6B/24+7.5hp/4p Siemens V1 motor
Pump 1 1895006 1895006

-
Fire hydrant BSS 65mm each 3600
65mm 20 3600/quantity 72000

-
Site engineers visit
Site engineers 1440 hour 146/hour 210240

visit
Sand Cushion Value in case of PVC pipe = 100000
Provision of Air Valves Non return Valves = 30,000
Total 3300626 Rs.

Bill of Quantities For direct Pumping
Pressure Pipe
Sizes(mm) quantity unit rate total
100 119 m 22 2618
150 410 m 32 13120
225 918 m 36 33048
300 592 m 44 26048
Providing cutting, jointing, testing and disinfection or equivalent make the cost of pipe
material
100 300 m 93.20 27960
150 500 m 145.00 72500
225 650 m 235.85 153302.5
300 450 m 276.90 124605
Earth worth excavation in open cutting up to 1.5m to 3m for roads, streets including
Backfilling & disposal of excavated material for ordinary soil
100 47.6 m3 201.05 286496.25
150 410.6 m3 201.05 82551.13
225 550.8 m3 201.05 110738
300 355.2 m3 201.05 71412.96
Deep well turbine pump B6B/24+7.5hp/4p Siemens V1 motor
Pump 1 1895006 1895006

-
Fire hydrant BSS 65mm each 3600
65mm 20 3600/quantity 72000

-
Site engineers visit
Site engineers 1440 hour 146/hour 210240

visit
Sand Cushion Value in case of PVC pipe = 100000
Provision of Air Valves Non return Valves = 30,000
Total 3297726 Rs.

Water Supply Report

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Water Supply Report

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Water Supply and Wastewater Engineering Lab 2015-En-11

Figure 1. H.B.F.C Housing Society

Design of Water Supply System

Design Period Adopted for Water Supply

RESIDENTIAL USEAGE LPCD (Liter per Capita Per

For Commercial Purposes

In 10 Marla house people are living = 5 Persons

Estimated Future Population=4172×(1+0.015)25

According to Estimated Future Population we have to assume population

Allotment Assumed Population

1. Total water demand

2. The minimum residual pressure

Qavg=25.26 Liters /Sec

Peak Hourly water Demand

Maximum water Demand

Minimum Residual Head in Pipes

Type of Pipes used in water distribution system

It mostly use in Water Supply System. It is available in 20mm to 800mm diameter.

Design Procedure for EPA.Net Software

2. Assign plots to each node.

5. Calculate the average consumption at each node.

Figure 2. Pumping With Storage

Figure 3. Direct Pumping

Design of Tube Well, Pump and OHR (Overhead Reservoir)

Maximum Daily Demand

Design of Over Head Reservoir/Tank

Number of OHR=Number of Reservoir

Capacity of one OHR=V ( m 3 )=121.25 m 3

Usually Depth of OHR=8 ft−10 ft

Depth of Ground water table = 30.48 m

Peak Hourly Demand

Total Head = 60.406m

Pumping with Storage

Input File: 2015-EN-11.net

Link - Node Table:

Direct Pumping Results

Input File: 2015-EN-11.net

Link - Node Table:

Results With discussion

Sizes(mm) quantity unit rate total

100 119 m 22 2618

150 410 m 32 13120

225 918 m 36 33048

300 592 m 44 26048

100 300 m 93.20 27960

150 500 m 145.00 72500

225 650 m 235.85 153302.5

300 450 m 276.90 124605

150 410.6 m3 201.05 82551.13

225 550.8 m3 201.05 110738

300 355.2 m3 201.05 71412.96

Storage tank of height 20m

Storage tank of 9.44 gallon 215/gallon 2029.6

Pump 1 1895006 1895006

65mm 20 3600/quantity 72000

Site engineers 1440 hour 146/hour 210240

Total 3300626 Rs.

Bill of Quantities For direct Pumping

Sizes(mm) quantity unit rate total

100 119 m 22 2618

150 410 m 32 13120

225 918 m 36 33048

300 592 m 44 26048

100 300 m 93.20 27960