Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
This work aims to develop an Artificial Neural PID control strategy and the advanced Model
Network based Model Reference Adaptive Control Reference Adaptive control strategy. The
strategy for an Industrial Process. The inherent ineffectiveness of both these strategies to certain
advantage of the Neural Network to adapt in real application specific areas is presented. The
time together with the effectiveness of Model concentration and temperature control of the process
Reference Adaptive control is utilized in the control is done by using the model reference adaptive system
of Industrial Chemical process. which gives more accurate response by minimizing
Key words: CSTR process, MARC, ANN, Adaptive the error than using the generalized PID controller.
I.INTRODUCTION
An intelligent system [13], [8] is a system that is able II.PROCESS DESCRIPTION
to make decisions that would be regarded as The schematic sketch of the Continuous
intelligent if were done by humans. In dealing with Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR)[6,7] is shown in
highly sophisticated process control, where much figure.l
stability and accuracy are expected probably
perturbations may interface and disturb the output
variable. This disturbance is caused as the
perturbations are getting fed back through the error
detector to the controller. Intelligent controllers
adapt them they correct decisions automatically for
future .Neural network is such an intelligent system.
A neural network based model reference adaptive
control [17] is proposed to resolve the problem of
concentration control in CSTR process. This
proposed method can adjust the controller parameters
in response to changes in plant and disturbance in
real time by referring to the reference model that �
Product. out
specifies properties [15] of the desired control Figure 1 Schematic Sketch of the Continuous Stirred
system. Hence the optimization of the controller is Tank Reactor (CSTR)
significant. It enhances stability over parameters and The reactor vessel volume is V. An agitator
makes the system ultimately immune to is used to make the reactor contents be well mixed.
perturbations. The resulting system [14]can be The inlet reactant with feed rate F, concentration Cin
viewed as a sort of adaptable control methodology. and temperature Tm is fed from the top of the vessel.
The system is optimized [1], [9], [10] using the The product stream is gathered at the exit. If the
neural supervisory control. The set of input and reactor contents are perfectly mixed, then the
output are predetermined using the model reference compositions are uniform everywhere in the reactor
adaptive system. The set of inputs and outputs thus and the product stream is at the same concentration
obtained are used for training the neural network .As as the mixture in the reactor. In other words, the
a solution to the mentioned problems, a control composition concentration CA and temperature T at
strategy employing Model Reference Adaptive which reaction takes place are the same as the
control with a peripheral Neural Network Interface is composition concentration and temperature of any
proposed exit stream. Therefore, progress of reaction can be
This paper presents here a comparative study of monitored by observing the product stream
the performance of the process with the convention concentration CA and the reactor temperature T. The
exothermic chemical reaction taking place in a CSTR Fig 2 General Block Diagram of MRAController
produces a high heat of reaction. To maintain the The block diagram in fIg 2 shows the structure of a
reactor temperature at its proper value, the jacket is MRAC system that composed of a plant containing
cooled or heated by the coolant with temperature Te. the unknown parameters, a reference model, and a
It is assumed that the product concentration CA will feedback control law containing adjustable
settle down to the desired value if the reactor parameters.
temperature T is controlled properly. Therefore, the Adaptive controller [10], [11] involves modifying the
main objective in this research work is to properly control law used by a controller to cope with the fact
adjust the temperature of coolant To of the CSTR that the parameter [5] of the system being controlled
control system such that the reactor temperature T are slowly time varying or uncertain. The adaptive
can follow the desired values even in the case of control does not need prior information about the
disturbances in inlet reactant temperature Tin. bounds on these uncertain or time- varying
The component balance for the reactor can parameters.
be given as, The parameters are adjusted by using the MIT rule.
dx - V CAi - CA - CA
(1)
The energy balance by, A system which has one adjustable parameter
Fp Cp (Tin - T) + Vk e-E/RT cA.dH + Q
pV Cp '!:!:. (2)
dt
.'A: is considered .The closed loop response is
=
constant and the time lag respectively. The MIT rule is:
dA D] De
= (5)
The controlled object is given by the following dt Y DA = ye DA
equation:
B.SCHEMATIC OF MRAC REFERENCE TO THE
G(s) = 0.5 e·45s /1+100s (4) PROCESS IN SIMULINK
376
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
0 1 S P LAY UNI T
377
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
378
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
. 02
i
, 0
l--
••• - -+-- �e-- - -+-- �f__- _+_- ___!
.< .
The MRAC fails to track the noise or external Fig 15 Neural Network Trained to 5000Samples
disturbances that may affect the process on the later
stages as well during real time applications. To V.ANALYSIS OF NEURAL NETWORK
minimize those errors and to have better control over The Neural Network identified for the proposed
the system we introduce artificial neural network control strategy is Feed Forward with back
based on model reference adaptive controller. propagation. The training of the Neural Network has
been done with a sufficiently large dataset which is
necessary for ensuring the effectiveness of the
B.APPROACH TO MINIMIZE ERROR IN Neural Network.
NEURAL NETWORK Fig.16 shows the response of neural network
scheme adapted with gain variation. Initially large
To make the system immune to possible noise amount of noise will be incorporated to the system as
conditions, familiarizing the system to specific the neural system start to initialize its tracks all the
standard conditions is worthy. The reliability, error, it can even track and reduce all the error that
accuracy, finally the entire performance itself may occur during the whole process.
improves when the number of standard noise
samples known to the system increases. When only
50 samples the error is reduced. Again when the
neural network is trained with 500 samples the error
reduces. The above points are brought out through a
comparative study among the responses shown in fig
13,14 and 15
379
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
10 1 .1 I
1 '1 I
� - - - - - - - - - =
Fig 18. Plant Response of Neural Network Fig 21 Model Response of Neural Network with
The error response of the neural network is Output Variation
depicted in fig 19. Initially the system contains large
disturbances as there is variation between the plant Fig 22 depicts the response of plant of neural
and model. The systems automatically get adjusted network with output variations
and the errors get minimized.
380
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
381
2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET]
382