Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
It is important to point out that during this period various papers and texts of
interest to social science and sociology in particular were presented; for
example, during the first national culture symposium held in Luanda from 1 to 6
October 1984, and also the colloquium on the cultural dimension of devel-
opment from 10-16 September 1989.
In 1991 an ‘Angola Working Group’ was created in conjunction with
CODESRIA; and issued three publications from 1991 to 1992. Thereafter the
initiative seems to have lapsed, perhaps due to the difficult post-war interval.
In 1993, the AASA – an acronym in Portuguese for the Angolan Association
of Sociologists and Anthropologists – was established with the aim of
promoting scientific and cultural initiatives in social science, as well as
publishing a review Ngola, of which only one issue saw the light of day.
In September 20003, SAS the Angolan Society of Sociology (SAS), with
almost the same aims as AASA but without anthropologists, was established,
composed of sociologists as well other social scientists with sociological
interests.
According to Fernando Pacheco, in an analysis in 1991 on scientific investi-
gation in Angola, the post-independence situation was conditioned by three
determinant factors:
(i) The exodus of Portuguese scientific personnel, who had abandoned
Angola during the period that antedated independence and were never
replaced, either in quality or in quantity.
(ii) The general lack of resources allocated to an activity that had not been
seen as a priority in a country almost destroyed by war.
(iii) The lack of adequate research into national politics and society.
2.1. Main Features of Sociology during the First Republic
After independence sociology was basically excluded from institutions of
knowledge. Rather the emphasis was on the ideology of Marxism-Leninism.
The ideology failed to gain significant followers or political leaders, and did not
contribute to the development of Angola. Thus personnel in sociology taught
historical materialism, with a monopoly in social science basically of Marxism-
Leninism ideology. This was an imported intellectual influence; and was rather
seen as a philosophy for Angolan society.
There was a lack of scientific research partly due to the influence of
historical materialism. Thus social science did not succeed in deepening
knowledge and culture studies in Angola. Many staff were from fields other
than true social science. Indeed there were some studies arising out of
individual initiatives, but they were not always seen as in the interest of the
party’s rule and views.
There were however a number of social, artistic and literary works during the
First Republic with a marked sensitivity to the social dimension of literature,
with the priority objective of establishing an authentic Angolan literature.
100 AFRICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 10(1)
Among a wide variety of works in literature from Angolan writers one can refer
to texts with social context that merit a sociological reading: like Sagrada
Esperança (Sacred Hope) written by Agostinho Neto the former Angolan
president, Dizanga dia Muenhu by Boaventura Cardoso; Os discursos do
Mestre Tamoda, by Uanyenga Xitu; Quem me dera ser Onda by Manuel Rui;
and Maiombe by Pepetela (Luiz J. Manuel da Costa; NGOLA; revista de
estudos sociais janeiro-dezembro 1997, vol. 1, no. 1).
5. From 1992 with the Second Republic: what position for sociology?
The new Angolan constitution, providing for democratic multi-party
government after 1991, marked a major change for Angolan academics. There
developed institutions with space for scientific research and teaching as well
professional promotion. At ISCED a sociology option was introduced,
although with an educational training content.
THE STATE OF SOCIOLOGY IN ANGOLA 101
Conclusion
Most research activity at institutions in the post-war period was characterised
by the absence of clear rules and by planned political material. In general, there
has been an attempt to preserve the existing inheritance, threatened by the
consequences of the conflict, and also by the limited horizons of political
leaders. In some cases, a few studies were carried out and edited, but some were
not published since they did not conform to the party’s rule and development
priorities. The government in general and specific Ministries do not prioritise
social scientific research and study in their political strategies and budgets.
The result of this situation has been difficulties, even failures and a lack of
trust, when launching development projects, or devising crucial policy
decisions. There are some individual initiatives inside the country as well as
abroad, but they are not usually taken into account due to lack of government
interest or other political considerations. Our scientific culture, even with the
one public university and few private institutions, is too limited and particularly
concentrated in Luanda. Many social scientists are unwillingly forced to worry
about finding solutions to their daily problems and lack of resources; and do not
have enough time to devote to research. The clientelism of the ruling party and
traffic in influence suffocate individual initiative and stultify any personal
creativity among social scientists, who are seen as not politically reliable.
There is a gap between the intention to promote sociology, even in the Science
and Technology ministry, and the concrete actions that eventuate. In general,
surveys, case studies and so on are often funded by institutions of the United
Nations and by international NGOs. Few studies are generated from the
national authorities, although mention can be made of some initiatives from
INE, the national institute of statistics related to the Planning Ministry. The
kind of documents issued by Ministries are in general annual reports, or compi-
lations of statistics, at times lacking rigour in questioning, criticism and reliable
data production.
References
Ciencias Sociais Em África; Alguns projectos de Investigação, Dakar, CODESRIA,
1992.
NGOLA: Revista de Estudos Sociais, Associação de Antropólogos e Sociólogos,
Janeiro-Dezembro, 1997, vol. 1, no. 1.
Pacheco, Fernando, ‘As ciências sociais em Angola: Ponto de situação in N’gola’,
Revista de Estudos Sociais, Janeiro-Dezembro, 1997, vol. I, no. 1 (AASA).