Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Ontario
G U I D E L I N E
P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R S
P R O V I D I N G G E N E R A L
R E V I E W O F C O N S T R U C T I O N
A S R E Q U I R E D B Y T H E
O N T A R I O B U I L D I N G C O D E
P r e p a r e d b y : D i c k S e a l , P. E n g . ( C h a i r ) / K e n A n d r u s , O B O A / V i n c e n t C h u , P. E n g . /
W i l l i a m W o n g , P. E n g .
Notice: The Professional Standards Committee has a policy of reviewing guidelines every five years to determine
i f t h e g u i d e l i n e i s s t i l l v i a b l e a n d a d e q u a t e . H o w e v e r, p r a c t i c e b u l l e t i n s m i g h t b e i s s u e d f r o m t i m e t o t i m e t o
clarify statements made herein or to add information useful to those professional engineers engaged in this area
of practice. Users of this guideline who have questions, comments or suggestions for future amendments and
revisions are invited to submit these to PEO using the form provided in Appendix 7.
2. Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Additional Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Appendix 1. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 3
2. Preface
This guideline is a revision of a previously issued draft of the new guideline to the Professional
Guideline for Professional Engineers Providing Practice Committee on March 18, 2003.
General Review of Construction as Required by the
At various stages of the development process, drafts
Ontario Building Code. The first guideline on this
of this guideline were distributed to a network of
topic was issued in 1987. This followed the 1986
reviewers. These reviewers were a valuable source
introduction into the Regulation made under the
of additional comments and questions. Council
Professional Engineers Act of the per formance
approved the final draft on June 21, 2003.
standard for this work. The requirement for general
review by professional engineers and architects was This guideline is to be read in conjunction with
first introduced in the 1975 version of the Building Se c t i o n 2 o f O . Re g . 2 6 0 / 0 8 m a d e u n d e r t h e
Code Act. After reviewing the latest version of this Professional Engineers Act, which outlines the
guideline, which was published in 1996, the minimum acceptable standard for this work.
Professional Practice Committee (now called the Professional engineers providing general review
Professional Standards Committee) decided that of construction are advised that this section of
for several reasons it required significant revisions. the Regulation imposes on them a legal onus to
In particular the guideline needed to deal with do all the identified tasks. This guideline is
changes in the building construction field resulting provided to clarify the nature of those tasks and
from the introduction of the Building Code Statute to outline what would be expected to constitute
Law Amendment Act, S.O. 2002, c.9. The prudent professional service done in accordance
committee also found that the guideline needed to with the Regulation.
describe the PEO-recommended procedures for
Practitioners providing this service should also be
dealing with projects for which a building permit
familiar with the Ontario Building Code and should
has not been obtained. There was also a need to
read the PEO guidelines for professional engineers
provide clear definitions of such terms as “rational
providing structural, mechanical or electrical
sampling” and “general conformity”.
engineering services in buildings and the Guideline
In late 2002, the Professional Practice Committee to Professional Practice to supplement the specifics
formed a subcommittee comprising practising of this guideline.
professional engineers, building officials and
Extracts of the applicable sections of the Professional
architects, and asked the group to prepare the new
Engineers Act and the Ontario Building Code are
guideline. The subcommittee met for the first time
shown in Appendix 2.
on November 26, 2002 and submitted a completed
4 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
4. Introduction
For the purposes of this guideline, “general review (Appendix 4), which is to be submitted to the chief
of construction” means the observation of the work building official with all building permit
in progress required by Division C, article 1.2.2.1. applications. These standard forms are referred to
of the Ontario Building Code. This section requires in the Ontario Building Code regulations and their
that professional engineers undertake general review use is recommended.
of the construction of certain specified buildings
For the purposes of this guideline, the client is the
in accordance with the performance standards of
person or entity who owns the building to be
PEO. It also requires that they forward copies of
re v i e we d . T h e g e n e r a l re v i e w e n g i n e e r i s t h e
all written reports arising out of this general review
professional engineer who undertakes to do the
process to the chief building official.
review. The relationship between the client and
General review of construction is intended to the general review engineer can be one of a specific
protect the public by ensuring that the buildings contract, e.g. the engineer is an outside consultant,
covered by the regulations are constructed in or one of employer and employee. The form of
accordance with approved, code-compliant plans. relationship does not change the per formance
This is consistent with the aim of the Building standards expected of the general review engineer.
Code Act, which establishes in subsection 34(5)
Since it is not mandatory that the same professional
that “the purpose of the regulations made under
engineer be retained for both design and general
this section is to establish standards for public
review of construction, this guideline is written
h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y, f i re p ro t e c t i o n , s t r u c t u r a l
assuming that the review engineer is not necessarily
s u f f i c i e n c y, a c c e s s i b i l i t y, c o n s e r v a t i o n a n d
the same professional as the designer of the works.
environmental integrity with respect to buildings.”
In such cases, review engineers have a duty to notify
Only plans approved by a municipal building
design engineers of their involvement in the project.
department and awarded a building permit can be
The responsibilities of these two engineers are quite
considered to be code-compliant and therefore
different. Design engineers retain responsibility
suitable for use in construction.
for the design. Review engineers are responsible
This guideline contains reference to engineers, only for making judgments and opinions
architects and building officials, and to standard regarding general conformity of the completed
forms prepared by a tripartite organization of them w o r k w i t h t h e d e s i g n d o c u m e n t s . Fo r t h o s e
(EABO) comprising members of Professional projects where a review engineer is doing both
Engineers Ontario (PEO), the Ontario Association the general review of construction required by the
of Architects (OAA) and the Ontario Building Ontario Building Code and site review, including
Officials Association (OBOA). This group meets contract administration, for the owner, the review
regularly to discuss and deal with issues of common engineer is responsible for making design changes
concern. This group has prepared and agreed to when necessary. In such cases, the review engineer
have its members use a number of standardized takes responsibility for these design changes and
forms, including the EABO Commitment to General any impact that they have on the other components
Review for Architects and Professional Engineers of the completed project.
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 5
5. Professional Responsibility, Liability and Scope of Work
It is a violation of section 8(1) of the Ontario Building
5.1 Professional Responsibility
Code Act to provide a general review of a building to
be constructed or demolished without a building
General review of construction by professional
permit having been issued by the chief building
engineers is mandatory under the Ontario Building
official. Professional engineers must refuse to review
Code, to protect the public interest. It is not
work where construction is proceeding without a
necessarily synonymous with the general review
building permit. (See section 6.3 of this guideline,
during construction that is outlined in the
Procedure for Projects without Building Permits)
Professional Engineers Ontario guidelines for
p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r s p r ov i d i n g s t r u c t u r a l ,
mechanical, electrical or environmental engineering 5.2 Scope of Work
services. The PEO guidelines outline services that
may or may not be contracted by the client to Before accepting any assignment, professional
protect the client’s interest. It is not necessary for engineers should, in consultation with their clients,
the same engineer to provide both reviews, although prepare a detailed scope of work and affix this to
it is normal practice. An engineer providing both their contract for services. Engineers should refer
services should recognize the differences between t o t h e Us e o f Ag re e m e n t s b e t we e n C l i e n t s a n d
the two responsibilities and act accordingly. Engineers for Professional Engineering Services for
assistance in preparing a contract.
Professional engineers undertaking, or signing a
form of commitment to undertake, general review In general, professional engineers providing general
of construction under the Ontario Building Code are review of construction under the Ontario Building
obliged to report directly to the chief building Code should provide the following services:
official. In the event that their services are
terminated or if the contract with the client, or • advise the chief building official and the client,
t h e c l i e n t ’s a g e n t , h a s b e e n b r e a c h e d , t h e in writing prior to commencement of services,
professional engineer must notify the chief building of the scope of work covered by their review
official immediately. services. Appendix 3 is the recommended form
of commitment to be completed by client and
It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure general review engineer;
adherence to the regulations made under the
Ontario Building Code Act. It is the responsibility • attend, or delegate a suitable person to attend,
o f t h e g e n e r a l re v i e w e n g i n e e r t o re v i e w t h e at the site periodically to observe the cons-
construction and to report on any observed truction underway;
breaches of the building permit documents or the
Ontario Building Code. General review engineers • undertake, or supervise, the general review of shop
are not responsible for quality assurance on behalf drawings and samples submitted by the contractor.
of either the client or the contractor. Appendix 5 includes the recommended form for
shop drawings and samples review;
The Professional Engineers Act, Regulation 941 and
the Code of Ethics at section 77 of the Regulation • report in writing to the chief building official,
require that the general review engineer disclose the client and the contractor on the progress of
any potential conflicts of interest. the work and on any observed deficiencies and
6 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
how they are being rectified after each site visit. Professional engineers providing services to the
Appendix 4 includes the recommended form for public, such as general review of construction for
general review report; a client, must hold a Certificate of Authorization
(C of A), or be employees of a C of A holder.
• on completion of the general review, provide the Holders of Cs of A must either carry professional
chief building official and the client with a liability insurance as stipulated in section 74 of
confirmation that the general review has been Regulation 941, or disclose in writing to each client
carried out in accordance with the requirements that they are not insured and receive written
of the Professional Engineers Act. A recommended confirmation from the client of the disclosure.
project completion notice is provided in Appendix Professional engineers providing these services
6. This confirmation must be signed and sealed by without a Certificate of Authorization are violating
the general review engineer. the Professional Engineers Act. A professional
engineer reviewing construction on property owned
by the engineer’s employer does not need a C of A
5.3 Liability
but might require professional liability insurance
coverage to cover the engineer’s personal liabilities
Engineers should focus on the concept of “general
for the work.
conformance” as the basis of their review. Their
role is to observe that the work agrees with the
A professional engineer undertaking a general review
design concept rather than to inspect whether the
of construction must be aware that the Building
work meets the details of the plans and
Code Act sets out the personal liabilities incurred
specifications. Inspection entails greater risk for
by an engineer who gives advice and provides reports
liability than observation. Canadian courts have
required under the act. These liabilities are personal
stated that review engineers are not required to
liabilities and apply to the engineer whose seal
observe everything done by the contractors. They
and/or signature are found on reports or other
are required only to make observations from time
documents associated with the work and not to the
to time to determine that the contractor is using
company that employs the engineer.
reasonable methods and that the methods are
properly carried out. However, the engineer must
obser ve “sufficiently frequently to ensure that
materials and quality of work conform to the
contractual requirements.” 1 Review engineers must
proceed in the way a reasonably prudent peer would
under similar circumstances. Where a client suggests
limiting the number of site visits, the review engineer
should inform the client that it is the engineer’s
responsibility to determine how many visits are
required in order to properly observe the work.
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 7
6. General Review of Construction
that may affect public health and safety, as well as
6.1 Performance Standards
a building’s fire protection, structural sufficiency,
The following section quotes section 2 of O.Reg. accessibility, conser vation and environmental
260/08 made under the Professional Engineers Act integrity. Written reports of these deficiencies,
in connection with the services to be provided by sequentially numbered, must be forwarded to the
professional engineers in undertaking a general chief building official and should also be sent to the
review of construction, as required by the Ontario owner, contractor and others as agreed to at the
Building Code. The non-italicized text describes beginning of the project. During subsequent visits,
how review engineers should conduct themselves in report on the condition of previous deficiencies
order to fulfill these requirements. and problems to assess whether the condition has
been or will be made good.
1. The professional engineer, with respect to the matters
that are governed by the building code, shall, The review engineer must repor t to the chief
building official all observed construction
i. make periodic visits to the site to determine,
deficiencies that would, at the completion of the
on a rational sampling basis, whether the work
work, prevent the chief building official from
is in general conformity with the plans and
authorizing occupancy of the building.
specifications for the building.
iii. review the reports of independent inspection
Professional engineers undertaking general review
and testing companies called for in the plans
of construction should establish a program for
and specifications and which pertain directly to
periodic visits to the site during construction, to
the work being reviewed.
review the work and ascertain that it is being executed
in general conformance with the plans and The plans and specifications issued for a building
specifications. The nature of an appropriate program permit will normally identify the requirements for
will vary, based on the complexity and characteristics inspection and testing of materials and products
of the work being undertaken. There should be a by certified testing laboratories in accordance with
sufficient number of visits scheduled at intervals over recognized test methods. In the event that testing
the complete construction period to ensure that the requirements are not established in the plans and
engineer can monitor all aspects of the work. Before specifications, the general review engineer shall
the work begins, establish a procedure whereby the require testing of material as required by the
contractor is responsible for informing the engineer Ontario Building Code.
prior to the start of each significant phase of the
General review engineers should refer to the plans
work, so that field visits can be properly scheduled.
and specifications for the testing requirements and
During each visit, engineers should apply a rational
review any reports of independent testing
sampling procedure to ascertain the condition of a
companies that pertain directly to the work being
representative number of each system component.
reviewed. General review engineers should ensure
ii. record deficiencies found during site visits and that copies of the written reports of the inspection
provide the client, the contractor and the owner and testing companies are forwarded to the chief
with written reports of the deficiencies and the building official. These reports should be
recommended actions that must be taken to accompanied by comments by the general review
rectify the deficiencies. engineer, where appropriate.
Professional engineers undertaking general review iv. interpret plans and specifications when requested
of construction shall record observed conditions to do so by the client, contractor or owner.
8 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Unless they are also the designers of the work, that the necessary authorization has been obtained
general review engineers are not responsible for for the changes.
the engineering associated with the plans and
The reviewing engineer should ensure that shop
s p e c i f i c a t i o n s p re p a re d f o r t h e w o rk s . W h e n
drawings resulting from the practice of professional
requested by the client or contractor, or when
engineering bear the seal and signature of the design
dictated by lack of clarity in the project
engineer and that other submissions, such as test
documentation, general review engineers should
results, have similar professional endorsements, as
seek written interpretation or clarification of
appropriate. To clarify responsibility, design engineers
requirements from the designer of the works. These
responsible for a shop drawing may indicate the
interpretations and clarifications should be
extent of the work that they have designed.
confirmed in writing and become an integral
component of the project documentation. Samples of products will be identified and reported
in a similar format to a shop drawing review.
The designer of the works is responsible for
Samples of products should be properly displayed
interpreting and clarifying the work during
for the chief building official’s reference and
construction, unless the design service is terminated,
securely maintained on the construction site.
or the contract with the client or the client’s agent
has been breached. If a professional engineer other Reviewing engineers should review submitted shop
than the design engineer carries out the general review, drawings, equipment tests, samples and balancing
that engineer should consult with the design engineer reports to the necessary degree to assure themselves
if and when assistance is required to interpret the of consistency with the intent of the contract, plans,
drawings and specifications, or when changes to the specification and applicable codes and standards.
original design are being contemplated.
Shop drawing and sample review is for general
If the design engineer is no longer involved in the conformity only and does not include detailed
project, the general review engineer should advise checking of dimensions or extensive checking
contractors on the interpretation of drawings and of calculations
specifications, and issue supplementary details and
instruction during the construction period as required. 6.2 Site Visit
v. review shop drawings and samples submitted Site visits are to take place periodically during the
by the contractor for consistency with the intent entire course of construction. This does not mean
of the plans and specifications. that visits must take place on a predetermined
routine, such as on a fixed day every two weeks.
Shop drawings are to be reviewed and their status
Instead, review engineers are expected to visit the
reported on the form shown in Appendix 5. This
site at intervals that enable them to see ongoing
re c o rd s h o u l d i n c l u d e c o n f i r m a t i o n t h a t t h e
construction of representative portions of the work.
submission has been revie wed by the general
The engineer should also be on site to view critical
contractor and that the components identified on
elements that may soon be covered.
the shop drawings and submissions are in general
conformity with the contract documents and intent A typical site visit by a general review engineer
of the design. should include, but not be limited to:
The chief building official must authorize shop • a general overview that good construction safety
drawings and samples that vary from or modify the practices are being followed as they relate to the
plans and documentation submitted for building work being reviewed. Construction safety is the
permit approval. The general review engineer contractor’s responsibility but reporting on
should determine from the designer of the works observed breaches of safety standards is consistent
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 9
with an engineer’s paramount duty to protect demolish a building or cause a building to be
the public welfare; constructed or demolished unless a permit has been
issued therefor by the chief building official.” Any
• a review of the existence of the site documentation
violation of the Ontario Building Code Act can result
required by Division C, subsection 1.3.2 of the
in a significant fine.
Ontario Building Code;
The Professional Engineers Act also imposes on
• a review, if appropriate, of any quality control
professional engineers a professional duty to comply
records since the previous site visit, such as
with this statutory requirement. Section 72(2)d of
concrete mix sheets, soil tests, or steel specs;
Regulation 941 defines “failure to make responsible
• a review of the condition of stored materials and provision for complying with applicable statutes,
assessment of storage techniques; regulations, standards, codes, by-laws and rules in
connection with work being undertaken by or
• a general observation of the current status of
under the responsibility of the practitioner” as
the work subject to review, with par ticular
professional misconduct. In other words, by failing
attention being directed to any specific aspects,
to comply with any law affecting the work, a
as deemed appropriate by the review engineer;
professional engineer could face discipline by
• a recording of the visit in the site log, if available; Professional Engineers Ontario, in addition to the
Ontario Building Code Act penalties. Therefore, for
• a provision of any written reports prepared to the
their own protection, reviewing engineers shall not
chief building official as required by Division C,
perform any site review until the client obtains a
article 1.2.2.1 of the Ontario Building Code.
building permit.
1 0 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
condition or practice, immediately advise 6.4 Report Requirements
(preferably in writing) the site superintendent
The review engineer shall prepare and submit to
of the danger or dangers associated with the
the chief building official a report for each site
condition or practices.
visit. The report shall contain appraisal of general
This standard of practice strikes a balance between conformity for only the work that was actually
a professional engineer’s duty to comply with observed during the particular visit for which the
a p p l i c a b l e l a w a n d t h e d u t y t o re p o r t u n s a f e report was issued. Each report should describe
conditions. An engineer must inform the building briefly the progress of construction since the last
official that the engineer cannot provide general visit, describe the components observed during the
review services because an agreement is in place current visit, identify remedial action on
between the engineer and the municipality based deficiencies noted in previous reports, describe
on the signing of the commitment form. The deficiencies identified during the current visit, and
building department must also be notified if for list tests observed, samples inspected, and any other
any other reason, such as termination of contract, third-party contribution used in determining
the engineer cannot fulfill the terms of this general conformity of the project. Each report for
agreement, i.e. to carry out general review. a particular project shall be dated and numbered
sequentially. A sample report form is provided in
Building officials, through their representatives on
Appendix 4.
the engineers, architects and building officials
working group (EABO), have agreed that they will
6.5 Sealing Documents
respond quickly to any call from a professional
engineer who is aware of constr uction that is The Professional Engineers Act requires professional
proceeding without a permit. The official is engineers to affix their seals to any document
expected to issue a compliance order as soon as containing engineering content that is provided as
possible after notification. Licensees should notify part of a service to the public. Reports attesting to
Professional Engineers Ontario if they have any t h e g e n e r a l c o n f o r m i t y o f b u i l d i n g s t h a t a re
concerns that officials are not dealing properly with generated during general review of construction are
projects they have refused to review. statements of professional opinion and therefore
must be sealed. For further information on the use
Engineers can take this action with reasonable
of seal, see the Guideline to Professional Practice and
assurance that the contractor, building owner or a
Guideline for Use of the Professional Engineer’s Seal.
third party cannot sue an engineer who refused to
conduct a general review on a building that is being
constructed without a permit. This follows from
the fact that no one can be compelled through
contract to perform an illegal act or can be held
to be negligent in their professional duties.
The Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) In June 2002, the provincial government revised the
and Regulations for Construction Projects, O. Ontario Building Code Act by adding certification
Reg. 213/91 impose requirements on workers, a n d i n s u r a n c e re q u i re m e n t s f o r s o m e d e s i g n
site superintendents, constructors and others professionals responsible for submission of some
working on construction sites for the purpose of documents required for building permit applications.
protecting the health and safety of everyone on These requirements do not apply to professional
site. All workers on a construction site, including engineers performing general reviews.
professional engineers or their designated
representatives visiting a site for the purpose of 7.2 Contractual Relationships,
conducting a review of construction, are required
Qualifications and Conflict
to comply with the requirements of the OHSA.
In particular, the engineer should be familiar of Interest
with sections 21 through 27, which describe the
Division C, article 1.2.2.1 of the Ontario Building
requirements for protective clothing, equipment
Code requires that the constructor of the works
and devices. When on site, professional engineers
ensure that a professional engineer be retained
must wear appropriate protective headgear and
to undertake the required general review of the
footwear at all times and must wear protective
engineering aspects of the works.
eyewear where there is a risk of eye injury. The
OHSA also requires that any worker who may The contractual relationships evolving from this
need to enter an area where fall arrest equipment requirement will depend upon the particular
is required must have had appropriate training. circumstances of each particular case. The general
The OHSA also identifies a number of situations review engineer may be an independent or an
where a professional engineer must design, employee of an independent firm not otherwise
inspect or certify cranes, work platforms, and professionally involved with the works.
temporary works, such as scaffolding and Alternatively, the engineer may be an independent
shoring. These are not the responsibility of the or an employee of an independent firm that has
professional engineer providing general review other professional involvement with the works,
of construction, but the engineer should be aware such as providing design or inspection services.
of these situations and bring to the attention of Otherwise, the engineer may be a member of, or
the site superintendent any non-compliance with closely associated with, a design-build team
the OHSA. contracted to construct the works.
The Regulations for Construction Projects requires In all cases, except those where the engineer is an
every entity engaged in the construction of the employee of the owner of the building, the
project, including the firm of engineers providing general review engineer will need to be a holder,
s i t e r e v i e w, t o c o m p l e t e a R e g i s t r a t i o n o f or an employee of a holder, of a valid Certificate
Constructors and Employers Engaged in of Authorization. The Professional Engineers Act,
1 2 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Regulation 941 and the Code of Ethics at section The inclusion of the EABO sample forms is also
77 of the Regulation require that the general re c o m m e n d e d . C o p i e s o f t h e s e f o r m s c a n b e
review engineer disclose any potential conflicts obtained from Professional Engineers Ontario.
of interest. This is particularly significant in cases
Essentially, there are three main parties involved in
where the review engineer has a close professional
the process under section 1.2.2.1 of the Ontario
involvement in other engineering aspects of the
Building Code: the client (or agent), the reviewing
w o r k s , s u c h a s d e s i g n o r d e s i g n - b u i l d . It i s
engineer and the chief building official. The
recommended that engineers closely associated
relationship between the first two is contractual,
with a design-build team be particularly cautious
while both have a statutory relationship with the
in committing to doing general review of any of
chief building official. These inter-relationships for
that team’s construction.
a particular case are confirmed by the use of the
As is prudent with all commercial relationships, EABO Commitment to General Review form, when
the terms of retaining the general review engineer signed by the parties involved.
should be subject to written contract.
The role of the chief building official is defined in
The nature of the par ticular contract in any the Ontario Building Code Act, its Regulations, and
particular case will depend on the broader general the Ontario Building Code. Chief building officials
contractual relationship under which the works have extensive powers in applying and interpreting
are being carried out. The general review engineer the Ontario Building Code. The ultimate enforcement
may be retained directly or indirectly depending mechanism available to a chief building official is
o n t h e e n g i n e e r ’s s t a t u s ( i n d e p e n d e n t o r the issuance, and enforcement, of an “order”, which
employee). This should be by contract with the would be the ultimate outcome if a chief building
client, or the client’s agent. Reference should be official found a general review to be unsatisfactory.
m a d e t o t h e PE O g u i d e l i n e s f o r Pro f e s s i o n a l This order would be to the building permit holder
Engineers Acting as Contract Employees, Professional and its impact on the reviewing engineer would
Engineers Acting as Independent Contractors and depend upon the terms of the contract under which
Use of Agreements Between Clients and Engineers the review work is being done.
for Professional Engineering Services for the typical
There is no requirement, or ethical obligation,
contractual terms that should be incorporated in
for the reviewing engineer to complete a general
the general review contract. The contract should
review if the contract with the client, or the
specifically address issues of fees; terms of
client’s agent, has been breached. However, the
payment and remedies for breach of contract by
e n g i n e e r h a s a p r o f e s s i o n a l d u t y t o p r ov i d e
non-payment or by early termination of services
t h e client and the chief building official with
by either party. Issues of copyright to reports
written notification of the termination of
should also be defined.
professional services.
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 13
Appendix 1. Definitions
General Review: Under Division C, article 1.2.2.1 engineer during the periodic visits to the works
of the Ontario Building Code, “general review” is required by section 78.1(i) of Regulation 941.
an inspection and reporting process to advise the At each visit, the reviewing engineer will exercise
chief building official if the works are being professional judgment to make a logical
constructed in general conformity with the plan determination, based on observations made
and other documentation that were the basis for during the course of the site visit, of what aspects
the issuance of the building permit. Additionally, of the works will be sampled at that visit at that
under section 2 of Regulation 260/08, the stage of the constr uction. Such samples may
reviewing engineer must also identify actions include visual inspections, material or
needed to correct any deficiencies found and performance tests, documents supplied by
interpret plans and specifications, when manufacturers, contractors or suppliers, or other
requested. A general review does not require the means required by the reviewing engineer. This
revie wing engineer to check the validity and determination may include considerations made
accuracy of the plans and other documentation. in advance of the visit but it must be based on
professional judgment applied at the site at the
General Review Engineer (or Reviewing Engineer)
time of the visit. A rational sampling basis
is the engineer providing general review of the
program cannot be fully predicted in advance of
construction in order to ascertain the general
periodic site visits and there is no requirement
conformity of the work with the plans and
to provide prior filing of a program of periodic
specifications submitted for the building permit.
site visits or sampling. However, a review engineer
Since general review of construction may relate
should request that the contractor provide
to several disciplines of engineering, various
appropriate notification prior to commencing
professionals might be needed on the same project.
significant portions of the work, so that visits
General Conformity (also referred to as General can be scheduled to observe this work.
Conformance): The “general conformity” opinion
Te m p o r a r y Wo r k s a r e i n s t a l l a t i o n s t h a t a r e
is a professional judgment by the reviewing
required to provide interim access, protection,
engineer that the standard of the construction
s u p p o r t , o r s e r v i c e s f o r w o rk s a n d m a t e r i a l s
work fulfills the essential requirements of the
during construction of the permanent works.
plans and other documents that were the basis
Contractors may be required by legislation or
for the issuance of the building permit. The
specification to provide professional engineering
reviewing engineer shall ensure that the work has
review of these installations. Refer to the
at least been done in accordance with normally
Guideline for Professional Engineers–Temporary
a c c e p t e d i n d u s t r y s t a n d a rd s w i t h a l i m i t i n g
Works. Temporary works are not normally subject
c r i t e r i o n b e i n g t h e r i s k t o p u b l i c s a f e t y. To
to review under Division C, article 1.2.2.1 of the
ascertain this, the engineer should observe
Ontario Building Code.
whether the contractor has fulfilled the majority
of requirements, including all the major
requirements, specified in the drawings,
s p e c i f i c a t i o n s o r s t a n d a rd s f o r a l l p r o d u c t s ,
processes or services provided by the contractor.
1 4 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Appendix 2. Extracts From O.Reg. 260/08, Made Under the
Professional Engineers Act , and the Ontario
Building Code
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 15
Ontario Building Code
design in accordance with which the
1.2.2. General Review
building is constructed.
1.2.2.1. General Review by Architect or
(2) Only a professional engineer may carry out or
Professional Engineer
provide the general review of the construction
(1) Except as permitted in Sentence (2), a person of a building,
who intends to construct or have constructed a (a) that is constructed in accordance with a
building required to be designed by an architect, design prepared or provided by a
professional engineer or both, shall ensure that professional engineer, or
an architect, professional engineer or both are (b) in relation to services that are provided
retained to undertake the general review of the by a professional engineer in connection
construction of the building in accordance with with the design in accordance with which
t h e p e r f o r m a n c e s t a n d a rd s o f t h e On t a r i o the building is constructed.
Association of Architects or the Association of
Professional Engineers of Ontario, as applicable,
to determine whether the construction is in 1.3.2. Site Documents
general conformity with the plans, sketches,
1.3.2.1. Permit Posting
drawings, graphic representations, specifications
and other documents that are prepared by an (1) Where a permit has been issued pursuant to the
architect, professional engineer or both and that Act, the person to whom it is issued shall have
form the basis for the issuance of a permit under the permit or a copy of it posted at all times
section 8 of the Act or any changes to it during construction or demolition in a
authorized by the chief building official. Copies conspicuous place on the property in respect of
of written reports arising out of the general which the permit was issued.
review shall be forwarded to the chief building
official or registered code agency, as the case may
1.3.2.2. Documentation on Site
be, by the architect, professional engineer or both
who have been retained to undertake the general (1) The person in charge of the construction of the
review of the construction of the building. building shall keep and maintain on the site of
the construction,
(2) An architect or a professional engineer need not
(a) at least one copy of drawings and
be retained to undertake the general review of
specifications certified by the chief building
construction of a building where the building is
official or a person designated by the chief
designed in accordance with Subsection 12.3.3.
building official to be a copy of those
of Division B.
submitted with the application for the
permit to construct the building, together
1.2.2.2. Restriction for General Review with changes that are authorized by the
chief building official or a person designated
(1) Only an architect may carry out or provide the
by the chief building official, and
general review of the construction of a building,
(b) authorization or facsimiles of it received
(a) that is constructed in accordance with a
from the Building Materials Evaluation
design prepared or provided by an
Commission, including specified terms
architect, or
and conditions.
(b) in relation to services that are provided
by an architect in connection with the
1 6 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Appendix 3. EABO Standard General Review Commitment Form
Commitment to General Reviews by Architect and Engineers
This form to be completed by the owner or owner’s authorized agent, and signed by all consultant retained for general reviews
Project Description:
WHEREAS the Ontario Building Code requires that the project described above be designed and reviewed during construction by an architect, professional
engineer or both that are licensed to practice in Ontario;
NOW THEREFORE the Owner, being the person who intends to construct or have the building constructed hereby warrants that:
1. The undersigned architect and/or professional engineers have been retained to provide general reviews of the construction of the building to determine whether
the construction is in general conformity with the plans and other documents that form the basis for the issuance of a building permit, in accordance with the
performance standards of the Ontario Association of Architects (OAA) and/or Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO);
2. All general review reports by the architect and/or professional engineers will be forwarded promptly to the Chief Building Official, and
3. Should any retained architect or professional engineer cease to provide general reviews for any reason during construction, the Chief Building Official will be notified
in writing immediately, and another architect or engineer will be appointed so that general review continues without interruption during construction.
The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she has read and agrees to the above
Name of Owner: Date:
Address:
Part B - Consultants
The undersigned architect and/or professional engineer(s) hereby certify that they have been retained to provide general reviews of the parts of construction of the building
indicated, to determine whether the construction is in general conformity with the plans and other documents that form the basis for the issuance of a building permit,
in accordance with the performance standards of the OAA and/or PEO.
Shaded portion to be completed by consultants
■ Architectural ■ Structural ■ Mechanical ■ Electrical ■ Site services ■ Other (specify):
Consultant Name: Signature: Print Name: Date:
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 17
Appendix
-- - 4. EABO Standard Visit Report Form and
PEO Supplements
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Attachments:
FESSIONAL
D PRO EN
SE G
IN
EN
EE
LIC
Distribution:
Building Owner
SAMPLE R
Contractor
Other (name)
EABO Standard form/Endorsed by OAA, PEO and Ontario Building Officials Association
1 8 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Appendix 5. PEO Standard Shop Drawing and Samples Review
Report (Template)
Professional Engineers
Ontario
Name of Practice:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Professional Engineers
Ontario
Date:
Professional Engineers
Report by: (print name)
Ontario Contractor:
Signature:
Attachments:
RO FESSIONAL
DP EN
G
SE
IN
EN
EE
LIC
Distribution:
R
Building Owner
SAMPLE
Contractor
Other (name)
2.0 COMMENTS
A brief description of any issues of concern encountered. Identify those items that are not compliant with codes or standards or deviate
from the approved building permit documents.
3.0 PREVIOUS DEFICIENCIES
A short summary revisiting the status of deficiencies from previous review reports, referenced by the report number. Identify items resolved
and any that remain outstanding.
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 19
Appendix 6. PEO Standard Project Completion Notice Template
Building Department
Town of Anywhere,
Anywhere, Ontario LOL OLO
Attention: Chief Building Official
Dear Sir/Madam:
During the course of construction of the above project, personnel from our firm carried out periodic site
reviews of [structural, mechanical, electrical] work in accordance with the requirements of Division C,
subdivision 1.2.2 of the Ontario Building Code and the requirements of section 2 of Ontario Regulation
260/08, made under the Professional Engineers Act, 1990, as amended. These reviews were conducted
following the procedures described in the Professional Engineers Ontario Guideline for Professional Engineers
Providing General Review of Construction as Required by the Ontario Building Code.
On the basis of these reviews [and the basis of reports submitted to our firm by independent testing and
inspection firms] it is our opinion that the work is in general conformity with the drawings and specifications
prepared by [DEF Engineering] under the professional seal of [designer’s name], P.Eng., which formed the
basis for issuance of the building permit and any changes thereto authorized by the Chief Building Official
with the exception of the following: (List deficiencies, uncompleted work, or warranty items outstanding at
the time of final visit).
Yours truly,
FESSIONAL
D PRO EN
SE G
IN
EN
EE
LIC
XXXXXXXX, P.Eng.
PR
XX:am OV IO
I N C E O F O N TA R
2 0 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Appendix 7. Amendment and Revision Submission Form
Guideline:
Reason:
Submitted by:
Date:
P ro f e ssi o n a l E n g i n e e r s O n t ar i o 21
Appendix 8. PEO Professional Practice Guidelines
2 2 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROVIDING GENERAL REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
Published by the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario