Earthquake Engineering

Assignment # 03

Submitted to: Dr. Munir Ahmed

Submitted by: Sadia Afzal
6/5/2017

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

CAPITAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ISLAMABAD
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

SEISMIC DESIGN OF A TYPICAL 10 STORIED OFFICE BUILDING

USING RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Seismic design of a typical 10 storied office building using static lateral force procedure was
carried out first before design through response spectrum analysis.

Given data:

f c’ = 3000 psi fy = 60,000 psi

Finishes load = 35 psf Partitions load = 20 psf

Live load = 50 psf Story Height = 12 ft

Assume rigid floors and masses lumped at floor level only.

Figure 1: Typical Floor Plan

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

A short summary of Seismic Design using Static Lateral Force Procedure:

Loads calculations of moment resisting frame

Slabs
Load = 849.6 kips
Beams
Load = 129.6 kips
Columns

As per ACI-318 column sizes are found out and ssing practical engineering approach taking
column sizes as:

 Column of 21" x 21" for stories 1, 2 and 3

 Column of 18" x 18" for stories 4 to 7
 Column of 15" x 15" for stories 8, 9 and 10

Self-load of columns

a) 21" x 21" w = 1.75 * 1.75 * 150 = 459.375 lb/ft

b) 18" x 18" w = 1.5 * 1.5 * 150 = 337.5 lb/ft
c) 15" x 15" w = 1.25 * 1.25 * 150 = 234.375 lb/ft

Calculation of total weight at floor levels was done and time period, base shear and story
shear was found out. The same thing in carried out in Etabs and design for seismic load
using all load combination.

Assumed column beam cross sections for gravity design failed under seismic loading when
checked via structure design software ETABS 9.7.1.

Updation of design after trials

Loads calculations of moment resisting frame

Columns

Using practical engineering approach taking column sizes results as:

 Columns of 30" x 30" and 27" x 27" for stories 1 and 2

 Columns of 27" x 27" for story 3
 Columns of 27" x 27" and 24" x 24" for story 4
 Columns of 24" x 24" for stories 5, 6 and 7
 Columns of 21" x 21" for story 8
 Column of 18" x 18" for stories 9 to 10
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Self-load of columns

a) 30" x 30" w = 2.5 * 2.5 * 150 = 937.5 lb/ft

b) 27" x 27" w = 2.25 * 2.25 * 150 = 759.375 lb/ft
c) 24" x 24" w = 2 * 2 * 150 = 600 lb/ft
d) 21" x 21" w = 1.75 * 1.75 * 150 = 459.375 lb/ft
e) 18" x 18" w = 1.5 * 1.5 * 150 = 337.5 lb/ft

Calculation of total weight at floor levels

1) 10th Story
Total load = 1057.8 kips
2) 9th Story
Total load = 1087.2 kips
3) 8th Story
Total load = 1098.9 kips
4) 7th Story
Total load = 1124.1 kips
5) 6th and 5th Story
Total load = 1137.6 kips
6) 4th Story
Total load = 1141.425 kips
7) 3rd Story
Total load = 1156.725 kips
8) 2nd Story
Total load = 1172.475 kips
9) 1st Story
Total load = 1176.75 kips

Total weight of frame = 11290.575 kips

Base shear using simplified static load procedure

1) Time Period as per UBC Section 1630.2

TA = Ct (hn)3/4 UBC-97 (30-8)

TA = 0.030 (120)3/4 = 1.088 sec
And
TB = 1.3TA UBC-Section 1630.2.2
TB = 1.3 * 1.088 = 1.414 sec > 0.7sec
Ft (force at top of structure) will be computed
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

2) Base Shear as per UBC Section 1630.2

Cv = 0.32 as Na = 1.0 (for zone 4 and Soil profile SA)

Ca = 0.32 as Na = 1.0
I=1
R = 8.5
T = 1.414 sec
W = 11290.575 kips
V = 0.32 x 1 x 11290.575 / (8.5 x 1.414) = 300.61 kips
Maximum Shear

V max = 2.5 * 0.32 * 1 * 11290.575 / 8.5 = 1162.64 kips

Minimum Shear

V max = 0.11 * 0.32 * 1 * 11290.575 = 397.43 kips

Minimum Shear for zone 4

V min = 0.8 * 0.4 * 1 * 11290.575 / 8.5 = 425 kips (governing)

3) Force at top of structure

Since T > 0.7 sec
Ft = 0.07 * T * V
Ft = 0.07 * 1.414 * 425= 42 kips
Total base shear = 425 + 42 = 467 kips

4) Story wise base shear distribution

Fx = (V-Ft) * (Wx * hx / Σ Wi hi)

Fx = (425-42) * (Wx * hx / 733127)
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Fx = 0.000522 * Wx * hx

Level Wx hx Wx * hx Fx Fx * hx
10 1057.8 120 126936 66.3114 7957.36
9 1087.2 108 117418 61.339 6624.61
8 1098.9 96 105494 55.1103 5290.59
7 1124.1 84 94424.4 49.3273 4143.49
6 1137.6 72 81907.2 42.7883 3080.76
5 1137.6 60 68256 35.6569 2139.42
4 1141.43 48 54788.4 28.6215 1373.83
3 1156.73 36 41642.1 21.7538 783.138
2 1172.48 24 28139.4 14.7 352.801
1 1176.75 12 14121 7.37681+42 592.522
Σ= Σ= Σ=
733127 424.985 32338.5

5) Factor of safety against overturning

Mr/Mo = (0.9WB/2)/(ΣFxhx/1.4)
= (1.4* (0.9 * 11290.575*60/2) / 32338.5
= 13.2

SEISMIC DESIGN OF A TYPICAL 10 STORIED OFFICE BUILDING

USING RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Taking the total weight at floor levels from static lateral force procedure lumped masses at
floor levels are as follows:

1) 10th Story

Total load = 1057.8 kips

Lumped mass m1 = w/g = 1057.8 / 386.4 = 2.74 kips sec2 / inch

2) 9th Story

Total load = 1087.2 kips

Lumped mass m2 = w/g = 1087.2 / 386.4 = 2.81 kips sec2 / inch

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

3) 8th Story

Total load = 1098.9 kips

Lumped mass m3 = w/g = 1098.9 / 386.4 = 2.84 kips sec2 / inch

4) 7th Story

Total load = 1124.1 kips

Lumped mass m4 = w/g = 1124.1 / 386.4 = 2.90 kips sec2 / inch

5) 6th and 5th Story

Total load = 1137.6 kips

Lumped mass m5, m6 = w/g = 1137.6 / 386.4 = 2.94 kips sec2 / inch

6) 4th Story

Total load = 1141.425 kips

Lumped mass m7 = w/g = 1141.425 / 386.4 = 2.95 kips sec2 / inch

7) 3rd Story

Total load = 1156.725 kips

Lumped mass m8 = w/g = 1156.725 / 386.4 = 2.99 kips sec2 / inch

8) 2nd Story

Total load = 1172.475 kips

Lumped mass m9 = w/g = 1172.475 / 386.4 = 30.3 kips sec2 / inch

9) 1st Story

Total load = 1176.75 kips

Lumped mass m9 = w/g = 1176.75 / 386.4 = 30.4 kips sec2 / inch

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Mass Matrix

2.74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
 0 2.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 2.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 2.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 
 0 0 0 0 2.94 0 0 0 0 0 
[M ]   
 0 0 0 0 0 2.94 0 0 0 0 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.95 0 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.99 0 0 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.03 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.04

Calculation of stiffness

For fixed column

Where
E = 57000√fc' = 3122018 psi = 3122 ksi
L = 12 ft
I = bd3 / 12

Moment of inertia

30" x 30" I = 30 * 303 /12 = 67500 in4

27" x 27" I = 27 * 273 /12 = 44286.75 in4

24" x 24" I = 24 * 243 /12 = 27648 in4

21" x 21" I = 21 * 213 /12 = 16206.75 in4

18" x 18" I = 18 * 183 /12 = 8748 in4

1) 9th and 10th Story

k1 = k2 = 12 * 3122 * 8748 / (12*12)3

= 109.76 kips/in

Total = 109.76 * 16 = 1756.13 kips/in

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

2) 8th Story
k3 = 12 * 3122 * 16206.75 / (12*12)3
= 203.3 kips/in
Total = 203.3 * 16 = 3253.44 kips/in

3) 5th to 7th Story

k4 = k5 = k6 =12 * 3122 * 27648 / (12*12)3
= 346.89 kips/in
Total = 346.89 * 16 = 5550.22 kips/in

4) 4th Story
k7 = 12 * 3122 * 44286.75/ (12*12)3
= 555.65 kips/in
Total = 555.65 * 4 = 2222.56 kips/in
And
k7 = 12 * 3122 * 27648/ (12*12)3
= 346.89 kips/in
Total = 346.89 * 12 = 4162.67 kips/in

Total = 2222.56 + 4162.67 = 6385.23 kips/in

5) 3rd Story
k8 = 12 * 3122 * 44286.75/ (12*12)3
= 555.65 kips/in
Total = 555.65 * 16 = 8890.4 kips/in

6) 2nd Story
k9 = 12 * 3122 * 67500/ (12*12)3
= 846.9 kips/in
Total = 846.9 * 4 = 3387.58 kips/in
And
k9 = 12 * 3122 * 44286.75/ (12*12)3
= 555.65 kips/in
Total = 555.65 * 12 = 6667.8 kips/in

Total = 3387.58 + 6667.8 = 10055.38 kips/in

7) 1st Story
k10 = 12 * 3122 * 67500/ (12*12)3
= 846.9 kips/in
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Total = 846.9 * 16 = 13550.4 kips/in

Stiffness Matrix

3512.3  1756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
  1756 5009.6  3253.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
 
 0  3253.4 8803.7  5550.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 
 
 0 0  5550.2 11100  5550.2 0 0 0 0 0 
 0 0 0  55502. 11100  5550.2 0 0 0 0 
[K ]   
 0 0 0 0  5550.2 11935.5  6385.2 0 0 0 
 0 0 0 0 0  6385.2 15275.6  8890.4 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 0  8890.4 18945.8  10055.2 0 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  10055.2 23605.8  13550.4
 
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  135504 13550.4 

Repeating (assignment 1) process through Mat lab and finding out updated normalized modal
matrix and displacement column vector
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Dynamic Procedure
For the fundamental period (Mode 1), the site specific spectral acceleration obtained from
the curve is as
Sa = 90.8 inches/sec2

The effective modal weight is given by

WE = (Σ Wi Фi)2 / Σ Wi Фi2

Level Wi Фi Wi * Фi Wi * Фi2 Fx V
10 1057.8 0.06699 70.8648 4.74742 11.4652 11.4652
9 1087.2 0.1317 143.184 18.8574 23.1658 34.631
8 1098.9 0.16421 180.45 29.6317 29.195 63.8261
7 1124.1 0.18135 203.853 36.9682 32.9813 96.8074
6 1137.6 0.19651 223.552 43.9305 36.1684 132.976
5 1137.6 0.20939 238.203 49.8776 38.5389 171.515
4 1141.43 0.21853 249.437 54.5096 40.3564 211.871
3 1156.73 0.22352 258.547 57.7895 41.8303 253.701
2 1172.48 0.22653 265.599 60.1658 42.9713 296.673
1 1176.75 0.22757 267.79 60.9401 43.3257 340
Σ= Σ= Σ= Σ=
11290.6 2101.48 417.418 340

WE = (Σ Wi Фi)2 / Σ Wi Фi2
= 10579.84

As a percentage of the total structure weight, the effective weight is

100[WE]/W = 100 * 10579.84 / 11290.6

= 93.7%

In order to obtained the effects from 90% of the total structure weight as required by UBC
Section 1631.5.2 only fundamental mode is enough in this case.

The total base shear is given by

VD = WE Sa /g
= 2486.15 kips
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

The governing static base shear is

V = 425 kips
The minimum allowable base shear for a regular structure using a site specific response spectrum
in accordance with UBC Section 1631.5.2, is given by the maximum value of

V = 0.8 * VS
= 340 kips…..controls
OR
V = VD / R
= 292.49 kips

Thus, the design lateral force at each level is given by

Fx = V * Wi * Фi / Σ Wi Фi)
= 340 * Wi * Фi / 2101.48
= 0.16179 * Wi * Фi
Fx for each level is given in table above.

Hence, the scaling factor for the dynamic analysis results is

r = 0.8 * VS / VD
= 340 / 2486.15
= 0.14

Displacements and story drifts

Displacement matrix is taken from Mat lab

1.454822
2.843787
3.536292
3.899944
[x] = 4.221807
4.496625
4.693714
4.802352
4.868494
4.891449
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Level hi Фi xi Drift (ΔEi) Drift Ratio

10 12 0.06699 4.89145 - -
9 12 0.1317 4.86849 0.02296 0.00191
8 12 0.16421 4.80235 0.06614 0.00551
7 12 0.18135 4.69371 0.10864 0.00905
6 12 0.19651 4.49662 0.19709 0.01642
5 12 0.20939 4.22181 0.27482 0.0229
4 12 0.21853 3.89994 0.32186 0.02682
3 12 0.22352 3.53629 0.36365 0.0303
2 12 0.22653 2.84379 0.69251 0.05771
1 12 0.22757 1.45482 1.38896 0.11575

The maximum inelastic design displacement a per UBC Section 1630.9.2

xmax = 0.7 * R * ΔS
where ΔS = design level response displacement
= xi * 0.8 * VS / VD
= xi * 0.14

xmax = 0.7 * R * xi * 0.14

= 0.833 * xi
The maximum inelastic design drift a per UBC Section 1630.9.2

ΔMi = 0.833 * ΔEi

Inelastic displacements and drifts are as follows

Maximum inelastic Maximum

Level xi Drift
displacements drifts
10 4.89145 - 4.07458 -
9 4.86849 0.02296 4.05546 0.01912
8 4.80235 0.06614 4.00036 0.0551
7 4.69371 0.10864 3.90986 0.0905
6 4.49662 0.19709 3.74569 0.16418
5 4.22181 0.27482 3.51677 0.22892
4 3.89994 0.32186 3.24865 0.26811
3 3.53629 0.36365 2.94573 0.30292
2 2.84379 0.69251 2.36887 0.57686
1 1.45482 1.38896 1.21187 1.15701
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

SEISMIC DESIGN OF A TYPICAL 10 STORIED OFFICE BUILDING

Figure 2: 3D ETABS Model

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Material properties

Reinforced concrete of cylindrical strength 3000 psi and steel of strength 60,000 psi is
defined in model to be used in different structural as shown below.

Figure 3- Concrete with strength 3000 psi

Figure 4- Steel with strength 60,000 psi

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Member properties

Frame members including beams & column are modeled as a line element whereas slabs
elements are modeled as area elements. Definition of elements is clarified in figures below.

Figure 5- Column definition

Figure 6- Beam definition

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Figure 7- slab definition

Diaphragm Modeling

Figure 8- diaphragm assignment

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Mass Source

Figure 9- Seismic Weight Definition

Load Cases

Figure 10- Static Load Cases

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Seismic loading

Figure 11- UBC 1997 Seismic Loading X- Direction

Figure 12- UBC 1997 Seismic Loading y- Direction

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Response spectrum function

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Response spectrum cases

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Modeling

Figure 13- column layout plan

Figure 14- elevational view of column sections

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Figure 15- elevational view of column reinforcement in2

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Figure 16-Beam Framing Plan

Figure 17- Flexural reinforcing diagram (unit: in2)

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT

STORY DATA (Kip-ft)

STORY SIMILAR TO HEIGHT ELEVATION

STORY10 STORY2 12.000 120.000
STORY9 STORY2 12.000 108.000
STORY8 STORY2 12.000 96.000
STORY7 STORY2 12.000 84.000
STORY6 STORY2 12.000 72.000
STORY5 STORY2 12.000 60.000
STORY4 STORY2 12.000 48.000
STORY3 STORY2 12.000 36.000
STORY2 None 12.000 24.000
STORY1 None 12.000 12.000
BASE None 0.000

DIAPHRAGM MASS DATA (Kip-ft)

STORY DIAPHRAGM MASS-X MASS-Y MMI X-M Y-M

STORY10 D1 3.368E+01 3.368E+01 2.187E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY9 D1 3.469E+01 3.469E+01 2.287E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY8 D1 3.499E+01 3.499E+01 2.319E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY7 D1 3.572E+01 3.572E+01 2.392E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY6 D1 3.614E+01 3.614E+01 2.434E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY5 D1 3.614E+01 3.614E+01 2.434E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY4 D1 3.624E+01 3.624E+01 2.436E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY3 D1 3.668E+01 3.668E+01 2.479E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY2 D1 3.715E+01 3.715E+01 2.526E+04 30.000 30.000

STORY1 D1 3.728E+01 3.728E+01 2.529E+04 30.000 30.000

MODAL PERIODS AND FREQUENCIES

MODE PERIOD FREQUENCY CIRCULAR FREQ

NUMBER (TIME) (CYCLES/TIME) (RADIANS/TIME)

Mode 1 1.58393 0.63134 3.96682

Mode 2 1.58393 0.63134 3.96682
Mode 3 1.32815 0.75293 4.73078
Mode 4 0.57104 1.75119 11.00305
Mode 5 0.57104 1.75119 11.00305
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Mode 6 0.47897 2.08782 13.11816

Mode 7 0.33769 2.96132 18.60649
Mode 8 0.33769 2.96132 18.60649
Mode 9 0.28618 3.49428 21.95519
Mode 10 0.23120 4.32534 27.17693

MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIOS

MODE X-TRANS Y-TRANS Z-TRANS RX-ROTN RY-ROTN RZ-ROTN
NUMBER %MASS <SUM> %MASS <SUM> %MASS <SUM> %MASS <SUM> %MASS <SUM> %MASS <SUM>

Mode 1 0.39 < 0> 76.37 < 76> 0.00 < 0> 99.31 < 99> 0.51 < 1> 0.00 < 0>
Mode 2 76.37 < 77> 0.39 < 77> 0.00 < 0> 0.51 <100> 99.31 <100> 0.00 < 0>
Mode 3 0.00 < 77> 0.00 < 77> 0.00 < 0> 0.00 <100> 0.00 <100> 77.82 < 78>
Mode 4 10.19 < 87> 0.95 < 78> 0.00 < 0> 0.00 <100> 0.01 <100> 0.00 < 78>
Mode 5 0.95 < 88> 10.19 < 88> 0.00 < 0> 0.01 <100> 0.00 <100> 0.00 < 78>
Mode 6 0.00 < 88> 0.00 < 88> 0.00 < 0> 0.00 <100> 0.00 <100> 10.30 < 88>
Mode 7 0.49 < 88> 4.35 < 92> 0.00 < 0> 0.10 <100> 0.01 <100> 0.00 < 88>
Mode 8 4.35 < 93> 0.49 < 93> 0.00 < 0> 0.01 <100> 0.10 <100> 0.00 < 88>
Mode 9 0.00 < 93> 0.00 < 93> 0.00 < 0> 0.00 <100> 0.00 <100> 4.78 < 93>
Mode 10 1.34 < 94> 0.92 < 94> 0.00 < 0> 0.00 <100> 0.01 <100> 0.00 < 93>

MODAL LOAD PARTICIPATION RATIOS (Kip-ft)

(STATIC AND DYNAMIC RATIOS ARE IN PERCENT)

TYPE NAME STATIC DYNAMIC

Load SELF 0.0000 0.0000
Load LIVE 0.0000 0.0000
Load SD 0.0000 0.0000
Load LS 0.0000 0.0000
Load LR 0.0000 0.0000
Load QX 99.9779 98.0238
Load QY 99.9731 97.7751
Load WX 99.9500 95.2583
Load WY 99.9500 95.2583
Load QX1 99.9778 98.0127
Load QY1 99.9730 97.7673
Load QX2 99.9778 98.0127
Load QY2 99.9730 97.7673
Accel UX 99.9424 93.6079
Accel UY 99.9276 92.9628
Accel UZ 0.0000 0.0000
Accel RX 99.9995 99.9379
Accel RY 99.9995 99.9407
Accel RZ 99.9077 92.1416

STORY DRIFTS

STORY DIRECTION LOAD MAX DRIFT

STORY10 X QX 1/643
STORY9 X QX 1/413
STORY8 X QX 1/394
STORY7 X QX 1/378
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

STORY6 X QX 1/333
STORY5 X QX 1/304
STORY4 X QX 1/297
STORY3 X QX 1/309
STORY2 X QX 1/351
STORY1 X QX 1/660
STORY10 Y QY 1/643
STORY9 Y QY 1/413
STORY8 Y QY 1/394
STORY7 Y QY 1/378
STORY6 Y QY 1/333
STORY5 Y QY 1/304
STORY4 Y QY 1/297
STORY3 Y QY 1/309
STORY2 Y QY 1/351
STORY1 Y QY 1/660
STORY10 X WX 1/11802
STORY9 X WX 1/5266
STORY8 X WX 1/4110
STORY7 X WX 1/3503
STORY6 X WX 1/2830
STORY5 X WX 1/2383
STORY4 X WX 1/2163
STORY3 X WX 1/2103
STORY2 X WX 1/2262
STORY1 X WX 1/4058
STORY10 X WY 1/11802
STORY9 X WY 1/5266
STORY8 X WY 1/4110
STORY7 X WY 1/3503
STORY6 X WY 1/2830
STORY5 X WY 1/2383
STORY4 X WY 1/2163
STORY3 X WY 1/2103
STORY2 X WY 1/2262
STORY1 X WY 1/4058
STORY10 X QX1 1/590
STORY9 X QX1 1/378
STORY8 X QX1 1/360
STORY7 X QX1 1/345
STORY6 X QX1 1/304
STORY5 X QX1 1/277
STORY4 X QX1 1/270
STORY3 X QX1 1/282
STORY2 X QX1 1/320
STORY1 X QX1 1/601
STORY10 Y QY1 1/590
STORY9 Y QY1 1/378
STORY8 Y QY1 1/360
STORY7 Y QY1 1/345
STORY6 Y QY1 1/304
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

STORY5 Y QY1 1/277

STORY4 Y QY1 1/270
STORY3 Y QY1 1/282
STORY2 Y QY1 1/320
STORY1 Y QY1 1/601
STORY10 X QX2 1/590
STORY9 X QX2 1/378
STORY8 X QX2 1/360
STORY7 X QX2 1/345
STORY6 X QX2 1/304
STORY5 X QX2 1/277
STORY4 X QX2 1/270
STORY3 X QX2 1/282
STORY2 X QX2 1/320
STORY1 X QX2 1/601
STORY10 Y QY2 1/590
STORY9 Y QY2 1/378
STORY8 Y QY2 1/360
STORY7 Y QY2 1/345
STORY6 Y QY2 1/304
STORY5 Y QY2 1/277
STORY4 Y QY2 1/270
STORY3 Y QY2 1/282
STORY2 Y QY2 1/320
STORY1 Y QY2 1/601

Figure 18- Maximum story drift in X direction

 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Figure 19- Maximum story drift in Y direction

STORY MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS

STORY LOAD DIR MAXIMUM AVERAGE RATIO

STORY10 QX X 0.3170 0.3170 1.000
STORY9 QX X 0.2983 0.2983 1.000
STORY8 QX X 0.2693 0.2693 1.000
STORY7 QX X 0.2388 0.2388 1.000
STORY6 QX X 0.2070 0.2070 1.000
STORY5 QX X 0.1710 0.1710 1.000
STORY4 QX X 0.1315 0.1315 1.000
STORY3 QX X 0.0912 0.0912 1.000
STORY2 QX X 0.0523 0.0523 1.000
STORY1 QX X 0.0182 0.0182 1.000
STORY10 QY Y 0.3170 0.3170 1.000
STORY9 QY Y 0.2983 0.2983 1.000
STORY8 QY Y 0.2693 0.2693 1.000
STORY7 QY Y 0.2388 0.2388 1.000
STORY6 QY Y 0.2070 0.2070 1.000
STORY5 QY Y 0.1710 0.1710 1.000
STORY4 QY Y 0.1315 0.1315 1.000
STORY3 QY Y 0.0912 0.0912 1.000
STORY2 QY Y 0.0523 0.0523 1.000
STORY1 QY Y 0.0182 0.0182 1.000
STORY10 WX X 0.0384 0.0384 1.000
STORY9 WX X 0.0374 0.0374 1.000
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

STORY8 WX X 0.0351 0.0351 1.000

STORY7 WX X 0.0322 0.0322 1.000
STORY6 WX X 0.0288 0.0288 1.000
STORY5 WX X 0.0246 0.0246 1.000
STORY4 WX X 0.0195 0.0195 1.000
STORY3 WX X 0.0140 0.0140 1.000
STORY2 WX X 0.0083 0.0083 1.000
STORY1 WX X 0.0030 0.0030 1.000
STORY10 WY X 0.0384 0.0384 1.000
STORY9 WY X 0.0374 0.0374 1.000
STORY8 WY X 0.0351 0.0351 1.000
STORY7 WY X 0.0322 0.0322 1.000
STORY6 WY X 0.0288 0.0288 1.000
STORY5 WY X 0.0246 0.0246 1.000
STORY4 WY X 0.0195 0.0195 1.000
STORY3 WY X 0.0140 0.0140 1.000
STORY2 WY X 0.0083 0.0083 1.000
STORY1 WY X 0.0030 0.0030 1.000
STORY10 QX1 X 0.3475 0.3170 1.096
STORY9 QX1 X 0.3271 0.2983 1.096
STORY8 QX1 X 0.2954 0.2693 1.097
STORY7 QX1 X 0.2620 0.2388 1.097
STORY6 QX1 X 0.2272 0.2070 1.098
STORY5 QX1 X 0.1878 0.1710 1.098
STORY4 QX1 X 0.1445 0.1315 1.098
STORY3 QX1 X 0.1001 0.0912 1.098
STORY2 QX1 X 0.0575 0.0523 1.099
STORY1 QX1 X 0.0200 0.0182 1.099
STORY10 QY1 Y 0.3475 0.3170 1.096
STORY9 QY1 Y 0.3271 0.2983 1.096
STORY8 QY1 Y 0.2954 0.2693 1.097
STORY7 QY1 Y 0.2620 0.2388 1.097
STORY6 QY1 Y 0.2272 0.2070 1.098
STORY5 QY1 Y 0.1878 0.1710 1.098
STORY4 QY1 Y 0.1445 0.1315 1.098
STORY3 QY1 Y 0.1001 0.0912 1.098
STORY2 QY1 Y 0.0575 0.0523 1.099
STORY1 QY1 Y 0.0200 0.0182 1.099
STORY10 QX2 X 0.3475 0.3170 1.096
STORY9 QX2 X 0.3271 0.2983 1.096
STORY8 QX2 X 0.2954 0.2693 1.097
STORY7 QX2 X 0.2620 0.2388 1.097
STORY6 QX2 X 0.2272 0.2070 1.098
STORY5 QX2 X 0.1878 0.1710 1.098
STORY4 QX2 X 0.1445 0.1315 1.098
STORY3 QX2 X 0.1001 0.0912 1.098
STORY2 QX2 X 0.0575 0.0523 1.099
STORY1 QX2 X 0.0200 0.0182 1.099
STORY10 QY2 Y 0.3475 0.3170 1.096
STORY9 QY2 Y 0.3271 0.2983 1.096
STORY8 QY2 Y 0.2954 0.2693 1.097
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

STORY7 QY2 Y 0.2620 0.2388 1.097

STORY6 QY2 Y 0.2272 0.2070 1.098
STORY5 QY2 Y 0.1878 0.1710 1.098
STORY4 QY2 Y 0.1445 0.1315 1.098
STORY3 QY2 Y 0.1001 0.0912 1.098
STORY2 QY2 Y 0.0575 0.0523 1.099
STORY1 QY2 Y 0.0200 0.0182 1.099
 Sadia Afzal
MCE163003

Comparison of manual results of static lateral force procedure with that of obtained from
software analysis

Figure 20- Time period, Base shear and Ft from Etabs

Manual Etabs
Time period used 1.414 1.414
Base Shear 425 434.5
Seismic weight used 11290.575 11541.38
Ft used 42 43.01