CANET V DECENA

420 SCRA 388 – Political Law – Municipal Corporation – Adminsitrative Powers –

Cockfighting
Rolando Canet was a cockpit operator in Bula, Camarines Sur while Julieta Decena was the
mayor therein. In 1998, Canet, by virtue of a council resolution, was allowed to operate a
cockpit in Bula. In 1999, the Sangguniang Bayan passed Ordinance 001 entitled “An
Ordinance Regulating the Operation of Cockpits and Other Related Game-Fowl Activities in
the Municipality of Bula, Camarines Sur and Providing Penalties for any Violation to (sic) the
Provisions Thereof.” This ordinance was submitted to Decena for her approval but she
denied it because the said ordinance does not contain rules and regulations as well as a
separability clause. The council then decided to shelf the ordinance indefinitely.
Meanwhile, Canet applied for a mayor’s permit for the operation of his cockpit. Decena
denied Canet’s application on the ground that under the Local Government Code of 1991
(Section 447 (a) (3) (v)), the authority to give licenses for the establishment, operation and
maintenance of cockpits as well as the regulation of cockfighting and commercial breeding
of gamecocks is vested in the Sangguniang Bayan. Therefore, she cannot issue the said
permit inasmuch as there was no ordinance passed by the Sangguniang Bayan authorizing
the same. Canet then sued Decena on the ground that he should be given a permit based
on the 1998 resolution allowing him to operate a cockpit as by virtue of local municipal tax
ordinances which generally provide for the issuance of a mayor’s permit for the operation of
businesses.
ISSUE: Whether or not Decena can be compelled to issue a permit sans a municipal
ordinance which would empower her to do so.
HELD: No. To compel Decena to issue the mayor’s permit would not only be a violation of
the explicit provisions of Section 447 of the Local Government Code of 1991, but would also
be an undue encroachment on Decena’s administrative prerogatives. Further, the 1998
resolution allowing Canet to operate cockpits cannot be implemented without an ordinance
allowing the operation of a cockpit (ordinance vs resolution). The tax ordinances Canet
mentioned contain general provisions for the issuance of business permits but do not
contain specific provisions prescribing the reasonable fees to be paid in the operation of
cockpits and other game fowl activities.