This document summarizes the calculations to check the fatigue strength of a drive shaft for a travelling tripper based on Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design. It provides details of the material properties, shaft geometry, bending and torsional loads, stress concentration factors, and calculations of endurance limits and safety factors using different fatigue failure theories. The safety factors calculated from all theories are above 1.2, indicating the selected shaft cross section is theoretically safe based on fatigue strength criteria.
This document summarizes the calculations to check the fatigue strength of a drive shaft for a travelling tripper based on Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design. It provides details of the material properties, shaft geometry, bending and torsional loads, stress concentration factors, and calculations of endurance limits and safety factors using different fatigue failure theories. The safety factors calculated from all theories are above 1.2, indicating the selected shaft cross section is theoretically safe based on fatigue strength criteria.
This document summarizes the calculations to check the fatigue strength of a drive shaft for a travelling tripper based on Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design. It provides details of the material properties, shaft geometry, bending and torsional loads, stress concentration factors, and calculations of endurance limits and safety factors using different fatigue failure theories. The safety factors calculated from all theories are above 1.2, indicating the selected shaft cross section is theoretically safe based on fatigue strength criteria.
Shaft calculations : fatigue strength criteria thyssenkrupp Industries India
as per Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design (Eighth Edition)
Date : 16-01-2016 Project : Mundra Travelling Tripper drive shaft Shaft cross section : At maximum bending moment section i.e. at 2440 mm from Non drive end of shaft.
Sr. no Particulars symbols values unit Remark / References
1 Selected material of construction 34CrNiMo6 or EN 24 2 Ultimate strength Sut 1200 MPa 3 Yield strength Sy 700 MPa 4 Larger Dia of Shaft Cross section which is to be checked D 150 mm 5 Smaller Dia of Shaft Cross section which is to be checked d 135 mm 6 Radius between D & d r 5 mm 7 Torsional moment at selected cross section Tm 2751744 Nmm 50% of total torque @ 2440 mm from non drive end of of shaft 8 Bending moment at selected cross section Ma 30294000 Nmm At critical section i.e. @ 2440 mm from non drive end of of shaft 9 Surface condition modification factor ka 0.865 Eq. 6-19 & Table 6.2 page no. 280 10 Size modification factor kb 0.699 Eq. 6-20 & page no. 280 11 Load modification factor kc 1 Eq. 6-26 & page no. 282 12 Temperature modification factor kd 1 page no. 282 13 Reliability factor ke 0.897 Table 6-5, page no. 285 14 Miscellaneous-effects modification factor kf 1 page no. 285 15 Endurance limit for test specimen S'e 600 MPa Equation 6-2, page no. 274 16 Endurance limit for calculations Se 325.4 MPa Eq. 6-18 & page no. 282 17 Ratio D/d 1.11 18 Ratio r/d 0.04 19 Stress concentration factor in Torsion Kt or Kfs 1.35 From graph Figure A-15-8 page no. 1008 20 Stress concentration factor in Bending Kb or Kfb 1.90 From graph Figure A-15-9 page no. 1009 21 Factor of Safety : DE Soderberg n 1.33 Equation 6-45, page no. 298 22 Factor of Safety : DE mod. Goodman n 1.35 Equation 6-46, page no. 298 23 Factor of Safety : DE Gerber n 1.37 Equation 6-47, page no. 298 24 Factor of Safety : DE ASME Elliptic n 1.37 Equation 6-48, page no. 298
Remark : As calculated factor of safety obtained from various theories of fatigue failures is greater than 1.2 thus selected cross section is therotically safe.