Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Describe the power of taxation. May a legislative body enact laws to raise
revenues in the absence of a constitutional provision granting said body the
power of tax? Explain.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Being an inherent power, the legislature can enact laws to raise revenues even without
the grant of said power in the Constitution. It must be noted that Constitutional
provisions relating to the power of taxation do not operate as grants of the power of
taxation to the Government, but instead merely constitute limitations upon a power
which would otherwise be practically without limit. [Cooley, Constitutional Limitations,
1927 8th Ed., p. 787] (BAR 2005)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Taxes are the lifeblood of the government, for without taxes, the government can
neither exist nor endure. A principal attribute of sovereignty, the exercise of taxing
power derives its source from the very existence of the state whose social contract with
its citizens obliges it to promote public interest and common good. The theory behind
the exercise of the power to tax emanates from necessity; without taxes, government
cannot fulfill its mandate of promoting the general welfare and well-being of the people.
(National Power Corporation vs. City of Cabanatuan)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(B) Lifeblood theory.
ANSWER:
The phrase, “taxes are the lifeblood of government, etc." expresses the underlying basis
of taxation which is governmental necessity, for indeed, without taxation, a government
can neither exists nor endure. Taxation is the indispensable and inevitable price for
civilized society: without taxes, the government would be paralyzed. This phrase has
been used, for instance, to justify the validity of the laws providing for summary
remedies in the collection of taxes. As a consequence of the above rule, an injunction
against the assessment and collection of taxes is generally withheld be the laws
imposing such taxes. Even when it is not so, under procedural laws such an injunction
may not be obtained as held in the case of Valley Trading Co. vs. CFI (G.R. No. 49529,
31 March 1989), where the Supreme Court ruled that the damages that may be caused
to the taxpayer by being made to pay the taxes cannot be said to be as irreparable as it
would be against the government’s inability to collect taxes. (BAR 1991)