Village of Fox Crossing

Village of
Fox Crossing
B ri dgi ng the Fox C it ies
COMPREH EN SIVE PL AN
2 018-2038
A CK NO W LE DG E ME N TS
VILLAGE BOARD Plan Adopted: July 23rd, 2018

Dale Youngquist, President List of dates for any approved plan amendments:
Michael Van Dyke
Kris Koeppe
Gregory Ziegler
Dale McNamee
Mark Englebert
Barbara Hanson
PLANNING COMMISSION
Dennis Jochman, Chair
Morris Cox
Michael Scheibe
Michael Dillon
Tracy Romzek
Aaron Sabel
Thomas Young
VILLAGE STAFF
George Dearborn, AICP, Director of Community
Development
Ria Hull, AICP, Associate Planner
MSA STAFF
Andrew Bremer, AICP, Project Manager
Becky Binz, AICP, Project Planner
Amber Converse, GIS Specialist
Jason Valerius, AICP, QA/QC
Project #: 10967004
II Village of Fox Crossing | Comprehensive Plan

C ON T E N TS
Chapter 1: Introduction
A summary of the role of the plan, the Wisconsin Smart Planning Act, the planning area
boundaries and regional context, and Fox Crossing’s previous planning efforts.
Chapter 2: Planning Process & Public Input Summary

A summary of the planning process, public participation plan and summaries of key takeaways
from the two public involvement meetings and public hearing that were held during the
planning process.
Chapter 3: Goals, Objectives & Strategies

An overall land use vision for the future of the community and a description of the goals,
objectives and strategies to achieve the vision for each planning element.
Chapter 4: Future Land Use Plan

Describes the future land use plan, map, and policies for the Village.
Chapter 5: Implementation
Outlines how the vision of the plan is implemented in everyday decisions and annual goal-setting
and budgeting, how the plan should be amended when necessary, and actions to pursue to
achieve the plan vision.
Appendix A: Community Indicators Report

A compilation of data and maps that describes the existing conditions, trends and projections for
the Village of Fox Crossing and surrounding region.
Appendix B: Community Survey

A summary of the responses from the on-line community survey completed as part of the
planning process.
Appendix C: Public Involvement Meeting Input

A compilation of comment forms completed at the two public involvement meetings held during
the planning project..
Appendix D: Maps
A set of existing conditions maps and future land use maps within the Village and its 1.5-mile
extraterritorial plat review area.
Chapter 1 | Introduction III

IV V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
Chapter 1 I ntro du c t ion
Ch a pte r 1
Co nte nt s
Introduction
Chapter 1 discusses the role of the plan, the Wisconsin Smart Planning Act,
the planning area boundaries and regional context, and Fox Crossing's
previous planning efforts.
»» The Plan as a Living Guide

»» A Snapshot of Fox Crossing
»» Other Planning Documents
Chapter 1 | Introduction 1-1

TH E PLAN AS A L IV IN G GU ID E
1
This chapter provides the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan,
Why Plan? The purpose of this outlining why we plan, the planning process, Wisconsin Smart Growth
plan is to establish a shared land Law, and the planning area. Chapter 1 also provides background on the
use vision for Fox Crossing to guide future community, including key community indicators, a summary of existing
actions and decisions. This guidance plans relevant to this study, and a copy of the public participation plan.
provides predictability and consistency
over time and encourages investment in WISCONSIN COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING LEGISLATION
an uncertain future.
Wisconsin’s Comprehensive Planning legislation [§66.1001 Wis.
2
Stats.] was adopted in October of 1999. The law requires that, after
Plan Maintenance. This document January 1, 2010, if a local government unit enacts or amends any of
serves as a “living” guide for growth the following ordinances, the ordinance must be consistent with that
and change for the Village of Fox Crossing. local governmental unit’s comprehensive plan:
The plan represents the Village’s best
effort to address current issues and • Official maps
anticipate future needs, but can and
should be amended as conditions warrant • Local subdivision regulations
reconsideration of policies in the plan. The
process of amending the comprehensive • General zoning ordinances
plan should not be onerous, but should act
as cause for reconsidering the long term • Shoreland/wetland zoning ordinance
vision for the community. The plan’s value
will be dependent upon frequent use and
occasional updates. Wis. Stat. 66.1001 does not mandate specific land use policies
communities must adopt, rather it requires that certain topics, or
3
elements, must be addressed in each plan, and the procedures for
Organization. The organization plan creation, adoption, and amendments.
of this plan is based both on the
planning process and the guidance COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ELEMENTS
provided by the Wisconsin Comprehensive
Planning Legislation. The plan is divided Wis. Stat. 66.1001 Law outlines nine elements that must be included
into five chapters plus several important in a community’s comprehensive plan:
appendices.
1. Issues and Opportunities
2. Housing
3. Transportation
4. Utilities & Community Facilities
5. Agricultural, Natural & Cultural Resources
6. Economic Development
7. Intergovernmental Cooperation
8. Land Use
9. Implementation
1-2 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
The Village of Fox Crossing has chosen to slightly modify the
terminology used throughout this plan from that used in the
state statute.
• Transportation has been modified to Mobility &

Transportation
• Economic Development has been modified to

Economic Prosperity
• Utilities and Community Facilities has been modified

to Community Facilities & Services
• Intergovernmental Cooperation has been modified to

Collaboration & Partnerships
• Cultural Resources has been modified to Community

Character
While the Village has chosen to deviate slightly from the

terminology used in the State Statute, the prescribed
requirements from §66.1001 are still addressed in their entirety
throughout this plan. The final nine elements of this plan are:
1. Housing
2. Mobility & Transportation
3. Economic Prosperity
4. Agricultural & Natural Resources
5. Community Facilities & services
6. Community Character
7. Collaboration & Partnerships
8. Land Use
9. Implementation
The information required under Wis. Stat. 66.1001 regarding

Issues and Opportunities is integrated throughout the plan.

A SNA P S HOT OF FOX CROSSIN G
The study area for this plan includes FOX CROSSING’S HISTORY In 2016 the Town incorporated and
all lands in which the Village has both became the Village of Fox Crossing.
a short- and long-term interest in Since its foundation in the middle The key reasons the Town chose to
planning and development activity. 19th century, the Town of Menasha incorporate include:
The planning area includes all lands (Village of Fox Crossing) had been
within the current municipal limits occupied almost exclusively by farms. • The area already had full municipal
(see map on page 9) and those However, the early metropolitan Fox services and was essentially
unincorporated lands within 1.5 miles Valley area soon became known for functioning as a Village.
of the Village's municipal limits (see the lumber business and paper mill
map on page 10). industry. It was not until a sudden • Incorporation creates permanent
spurt of growth in the 1940s that boundaries which are beneficial for
The Village is approximately 8,473 the Town became more urbanized. future planning.
acres (13.2 square miles) while the Between 1940 and 1950 the
planning area is approximately 19,665 population of the Town increased • The Village would gain control of
acres (30.7 square miles). 142% to nearly 3,000. The increase zoning and land division.
was attributed to the Town's location
REGIONAL CONTEXT between two cities, Appleton and • Incorporation would improve the
Menasha, which made it a natural use of Tax Increment Financing.
The Village of Fox Crossing is located in site for suburban homes. The Town
Winnebago County, which along with anticipated the forthcoming change • Incorporation would protect the
Outagamie and Calumet counties, to their once quiet small farming tax base by ensuring annexations
makes up the Appleton-Neenah- community and started to make would not occur.
Oshkosh Metropolitan Statistical improvements to the land and area.
Area (MSA). The Village's identity, This made the Town very attractive
"Bridging the Fox Cities" reflects to homeowners and corporations.
the fact that the Village is located Wisconsin's largest corporation at
on both the east and west sides of the time, Kimberly-Clark Corporation,
Little Lake Buttes des Morts (part of was headquartered
the Fox River) and is connected by in the Town, and
the Roland Kampo Bridge on State presently still
Highway 441. The Village is bordered operates facilities
by the City of Menasha to the east; in the Village.
the Town of Neenah and the City of
Neenah to the south; the Town of
Clayton to the west; and the towns
of Greenville and Grand Chute, and
the City of Appleton, to the north.
Major transportation facilities serving

the Village include I-41 and US 10. I-41
connects the Village to Appleton (7
miles), Oshkosh (16 miles), Fond du Lac
(40 miles) and Milwaukee (100 miles).
US 10 connects to the Village to the
eastern edge of the State in Manitowoc
(50 miles) and to the western edge of
the State in Prescott (265 miles). The
Village is also adjacent to the Appleton
International Airport.
S O
NE
ID A
AV
ST
T
EC
CB
P
ß
OS
PR
41
Corporate Limits
S NICOLET RD
!
"
#
S MEM ORIAL DR
S BLU MND DR
To w n o f
S CASALOM A DR
Grand Chute
City of W SEYMOUR ST
To w n o f G r e e n v i l l e
Appleton
Outagamie County W PROSPECT AV
Comprehensive Plan
WINNEGAMIE DR W P ROSPECT AVE
BB
ß
D
Winneb ago County W CA LUMET S T 2018-2038
M ud
Cr e
NORTHERN R
ek
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) VALLEY RD
A M E RICA
IRISH RD
N DR
10
COLD SPRING RD
441
441
/
. ¾
%¾% 441
%
¾
D
CH R
MIDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP)
EA
E SHADY LN
TS B
R
ED
M OR
S
H OR
Village of Fox Crossing
ES
E DE
K
LA
B UTT
STEAD DR
WEST AMERICAN DR
Little AIRPORT RD County
ONEIDA ST (US HW Y 10)
Lake Butte
RACINE RD (COUNTY RD P)
RD
Des Morts City of Appleton
ON
ST
ET
10 PL
.
/ AP City of Menasha
MELISSA
NINTH ST
City of Neenah
FAIRVIEW RD JACOBSEN RD 41 RD
"
!
# W OC
ITO
AN
M Village of Harrison
JA
114
LONDON ST
CO
Village.
/of
BS
SEVENTH ST
EN
IRISH RD
Harrison
RD
Town
RD
DR
N
A NK
PL
CA
I
COLD SPRING RD
R
TAYCO ST
E
M
A
MILWAUKEE ST
RACINE ST
Waterbody
CB
T
THIRD ST
R S RD
ß City of
ES
LE
AK
EH
Menasha Perennial Stream/River
NL
Me n a s h l Intermittent Stream/Rive
a C hanne
ßII
C a l u m e t C o un t y
Artificial Path/Ditch
Winneb ago County
O
ß
Village of
NAYMUT ST
N GREEN BAY RD
Fox Cros sing
NICOLET BLVD To w n o f
F
T
ox Neenah
LS
Lake
1ST ST
Ri
3RD ST
C IA
ve
r E FOREST AVE
ER
Winnebago
M
OM
C
Data Sources:
N
MA
Clayton
IN
To w n o f
ST Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet
41
ST
and Outagamie Counties.

ST
"
!
# Winnebago County, WI
CH
City of Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and

AK
To w n o f N e e n a h
UR
O
LARSEN RD
Neenah Outagamie Counties.
S CH
Aerial: ESRI
E
T
W
ST
IS
HARRISON S T
h S lou gh
E
CO
K
NS
S GREEN BAY RD
LA
IN
na
E RD WA
S
TULLAR RD
RID e E S AV
E
K AV HIN
OA Ne NE
EC ON GT
INN
ON 0 0.25 0.5 Miles
W AV
W E
S COMMERCIAL S
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_CorporateLimits.mxd Print Date: 6/6/2018
Chapter 1 | Introduction
1-5
N
BA
DG
ER
AV
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
W PACKARD ST
N
N DREW ST
N MEADE ST
MALL
DR
W COLLEGE AV
Appleton W COLLEGE AV
Planning Area
Internati onal
Ai rport W SPENCER ST
W SPENCER ST
S LAWE S T
I
"
Z CB
S O
ß 41
NE
"
!
# E SOUTH RIVER ST
AV
T
IDA
EC
S LYNNDALE DR
ST
k
City of Comprehensive Plan
SP
S NICOLET RD
ee
To w n o f
S BLU MND DR
Town of
RO
P
Appleton E FREMONT ST
Greenville
W
G rand C hute
2018-2038
S CASALOMA DR
Mud C r
S MEMORIA L DR
er
v
Ri
C o u n AVt y
O u t a g a m i eW PROSPECT Fo x
WINNEGAMIE DR
BB
ß W PROSPECT AVE
Winneb ago County
NORTHERN RD
A M ERICA
IRISH RD
N DR
441 10
%
¾ /
.
COLD SPRING RD
441
%
¾
RD
CH
Planning Area
EA
M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP)
DR
E SHADY LN
TS B
RE
MOR
HO
County
ES
ts
ES
K
e D
LA
ED
Mor es
B UTT
City of Appleton
STEAD DR
W EST AMERICAN DR
L it t le
Bu tt La ke
A IR
PO
RT
R ACINE RD (COUNTY RD P)
RD City of Menasha
RD
ST
N
10
TO
/
.
LE
City of Neenah
P
AP
NINTH ST
MELISSA
FAIRVIEW RD JACOBSEN RD
R D Village of Harrison
41 OC
"
! W
TO
# NI
MA
LONDON ST
SEVENTH ST Village .114

/
IRISH RD
R
Town
D
RD
N
NK
MILWAUKEE ST
of Harrison
A
A
IC PL
R
D
E
TAYCO ST
M
SR
A
RACINE ST
CB THIRD ST
Waterbody
ST
H L ER
ß
E
A KE
NL
City of
Mena sha Chan nel Menasha
A rr
ßII
ow
h
O
ea
ß
76
¾
%
d R
NAYMUT ST
N GREEN BAY RD
i v er NICOLET BLVD
Ca lu m et Cou nty
W in n eb a g o C o u n t y
1ST ST
3RD ST
Clayton
To w n o f
MA
IN
ST
E
LARSEN RD W Lake
IS C
ON City of
S IN Winnebago
S GREEN BAY RD
AV
E
HARRISON S T
ST
Neenah
TULLAR RD
h E
u g AK
Data Sources:
OAK ST

Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet
S lo S L
RD AV E and Outagamie Counties. Winnebago County, WI

GE NE
ah
ON Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and

RID EC
K INN
A Outagamie Counties.
en
O
WW
S PARK AVE
S COMMERCIAL ST
Ne
CONGRESS ST
W CE CIL ST E CECIL ST
JJ
ß 0 0.35 0.7 Miles
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_Planning Area.mxd Print Date: 6/6/2018

KEY COMMUNITY INDICATORS Age Profile, 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
The 2015 estimated population for the Village is
18,950; roughly 1,431 persons per square mile. From 28.4%
21.1%
1980 through 2010, the population in the Village
of Fox Crossing increased by 51%, as compared to
growth rates for the average of the Fox Cities (42%),
12.4% 12.1% 12.1% 13.8%
Winnebago County (23%) and the State (21%) during
the same time period.
Based on Wisconsin Department of Administration

(WDOA) data, the Village’s 2040 population is
projected to be 23,140 which is an increase of 25%
from 2010. This exceeds the average projected
growth rate of the average of the Fox Cities (24%), <10 10 - 20 35 - 55 - 65+
Winnebago County (16%) and the State (14%) during 19 - 34 54 64
this time period.
30-Year Population Change
In 2010, the median age in the Village was 38.5, Projection (2010-2040)
which is slightly higher than the average of the Fox Source: U.S. Census Bureau & WI DOA Projections
Cities (38.2),and higher than Winnebago County
(37.9). The Village has the highest proportion of
“senior citizens” (i.e. 65 and over) at 14% compared
to the average of the Fox Cities (12%), as well as 25%
Winnebago County (13%). In the future, the number 23,140
of those 65 and older is expected to increase as baby 18,498
boomers age.
Additional community indicators are summarized

in Appendix A.
Population Trends & Projections

Source: U.S. Census Bureau & WI DOA Projections
Village of Village of Town of City of Winnebago

Fox Crossing Harrison* Grand Chute Neenah County Wisconsin
1980 12,226 3,541 9,529 22,432 131,772 4,705,642
1990 13,975 3,195 14,490 23,219 140,320 4,891,769
2000 15,858 5,756 18,392 24,507 156,763 5,363,675
2010 18,498 10,839 20,919 25,501 166,994 5,686,986
2015 18,950 10,200 22,080 26,010 169,925 5,783,015
2020 20,070 11,760 23,980 26,990 177,050 6,005,080
2025 21,080 13,190 25,700 27,810 183,230 6,203,850
2030 22,020 14,600 27,320 28,520 188,680 6,375,910
2035 22,680 15,700 28,500 28,870 191,710 6,476,270
2040 23,140 16,550 29,270 28,970 193,130 6,491,635

OT HE R P LA NN I NG D OCU ME N TS
2003 PLAN UPDATE N O T A B L E N E I G H B O RI N G
COMMUNITY PLANS &
This plan is an update of the Village’s, STUDIES
or at that time the Town of Menasha's,
previous 2003 Comprehensive • City of Appleton Comprehensive
Plan. Per State Statute §66.1001, a Plan, 2016
Comprehensive Plan must be updated
every 10 years. Although this plan • City of Menasha Comprehensive
replaces the previous plan some of Plan, 2008
the core goals, objectives, and land use
strategies have been carried forward • City of Neenah Comprehensive
in this document. As such, this plan Plan, 2017
is considered a second generation
plan. In addition, a number of existing • Town of Clayton Comprehensive
Village and neighboring community Plan, 2016
plans were reviewed and pertinent
information helped to shape this plan. • Town of Grand Chute
Comprehensive Plan, 2010
VILLAGE PLANS & STUDIES
• Town of Greenville Comprehensive
• Town of Menasha Comprehensive Plan, 2009
Plan, 2003
• Town of Neenah Comprehensive
• Town of Menasha Economic Profile, Plan, 2009
2011
• Town of Menasha Commercial

Center Market Analysis &
Consumer Survey, revised 2011
• Town of Menasha Business Profile,

2013
• Town of Menasha Bicycle and

Pedestrian Plan, 2015
• Incorporation Submittal, 2015
• Village of Fox Crossing Zoning

Map, 2016
• Village of Fox Crossing

Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan, 2017-2021
Chapter 2 Pl an n i n g Pro cess & Pu bl i c I np ut
Ch a pte r 2
Co nte nt s
Planning Process & Public Input Summary
Chapter 2 provides a summary of the planning process, public participation
plan and summaries of key takeaways from the two public involvement
meetings and public hearing that were held during the planning process.
»» Planning Process
»» Public Participation Plan
»» Public Input Summary
Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input 2-1

PL A N N I NG P R O CE SS
MAY 8, 2017 - VILLAGE The Village of Fox Crossing engaged MSA Professional
BOARD MEETING #1 Services, Inc. to assist in updating its Comprehensive
• Public Participation Plan Adopted Plan, complying with Wisconsin’s Comprehensive
Planning requirements, §66.1001. This plan was drafted
JUNE 21, 2017 - PLANNING through a series of working meetings with the Planning
COMMISSION (PC) MEETING #1 Commission whereby individual chapters of this plan
• Review project scope & schedule were drafted and discussed. Major project milestones
• Review draft survey and project meetings are summarized in the adjacent
graphic.
JULY - SEPTEMBER, 2017 -
COMMUNITY SURVEY
As required by §66.1001, every community must adopt a
Public Participation Plan at the beginning of the planning
JULY 25, 2017 - PUBLIC
process. The purpose of the plan is to define the procedures
INVOLVEMENT MEETING #1 for public involvement during every stage of the planning
• Review project scope and schedule process (See page 2-3 and 2-4).
• Identify issues, opportunities and aspirations
Highlights of the public participation plan include:
AUGUST 16, 2017 - PC MEETING #2
• Review draft Community Indicators Report • A community online survey to gather input on all
• Discuss issues & opportunities planning issues.
OCTOBER 18, 2017 - PC MEETING #3 • An initial public involvement meeting to identify issues,
• Review survey responses opportunities and aspirations for the community.
• Discuss draft Goals, Objectives and Policies
• A second public involvement meeting to gather input
JANUARY 17, 2018 - PC MEETING #4 on the draft comprehensive plan.
• Discuss Future Land Use Map & policies
• A public hearing to gather input on the revised draft
MARCH 21, 2018 - PC MEETING #5 comprehensive plan prior to adoption by the Village
• Review first draft 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan Board.
APRIL 30, 2018 - PUBLIC

INVOLVEMENT MEETING #2
• Review draft 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan
MAY 16, 2018 - PC MEETING #6

• Review input received at Public
Involvement Meeting #2
• Review revised draft 2018-2038
Comprehensive Plan
JULY 18, 2018 - PC MEETING

#7 & PUBLIC HEARING
• Review final draft of 2018-2038
Comprehensive Plan
• Plan recommendation
JULY 9, 2018 - VILLAGE

BOARD MEETING #2
• Ordinance to approve Fox Crossing
P U BL I C P A R T I CIP ATION P LAN

2017 Comprehensive Plan Update
Public Participation Plan
The Village of Fox Crossing last updated its comprehensive land use plan in 2003. State Statute 66.1001 requires
municipalities to update their comprehensive plan every 10 years. The Village of Fox Crossing has elected to use the
Village’s Planning Commission to work with MSA Professional Services, Inc. to update the Village’s Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Commission will have the responsibility for reviewing and recommending the draft Comprehensive Plan
prepared by MSA and Village Staff. The Village Board shall have the authority to adopt the new updated Comprehensive
Plan.
The Village of Fox Crossing has developed guidelines for informing and involving the public as part of the requirements
of the Comprehensive Planning Process (Wis. Stat. 66.1001(4)a). The goal of a public participation plan is to foster public
participation, including open discussion, communication programs, information services, and public meetings for which
advance notice has been provided, in every stage of the preparation of a comprehensive plan.
Public Participation Opportunities:

The Village of Fox Crossing will develop its Comprehensive Plan with opportunities for public participation as follows:
 Project Meetings: The project will include 11 project meetings. All meetings which involve agenda items related to
the Comprehensive Plan update are anticipated to occur in open session and will be noticed according to Village’s
agenda posting practices.
o Plan Commission Meetings. The Plan Commission will hold seven meetings, six of which will be working
sessions with the Village’s consultant to review, discuss, and create project material related to the creation of
the draft Comprehensive Plan. A seventh meeting with the Planning Commission will include a formal public
hearing held on the draft Comprehensive Plan.
o Public Involvement Meetings. The project will include two public involvement meetings, the first at the
beginning of the project to share an overview of the project scope and schedule and engage people in
exercises to identify issues, opportunities and aspirations for the future of the Village. A second public
involvement meeting will be held to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on the draft
Comprehensive Plan.
o Public Hearing: One public hearing will be held on the updated Comprehensive Plan prior to adoption.
o Village Board Meeting. An initial Village Board meeting will be held to adopt this public participation plan. A
final meeting will occur before the Village Board to adopt the Comprehensive Plan.
 Project Website: The Village of Fox Crossing maintains its own website (www.foxcrossingwi.gov). The website may
be used to post draft plan materials, meeting notices, and meeting minutes as they become available.
 Project Comment Form: A general project comment form will be created to enable members of the public to submit
written comments regarding the Comprehensive Plan at any time during the planning process. The comment form
will be available at Village Hall and can be made available on the Village website.
 Community Survey: Using an online web survey the Village will invite the public to submit ideas for making Fox
Crossing a better place to live, work shop, play, and stay. The results of the survey will be incorporated into the
updated Comprehensive Plan.
Other public participation activities may be added as deemed necessary by Village Staff, the Plan Commission, or
Village Board.

Plan Adoption Procedures:
 The Planning Commission shall, by majority vote, adopt a resolution recommending that the Village Board pass an
ordinance to adopt the Draft Comprehensive Plan (Wis. Stat. 66.1001(4)b). Prior to taking action on the resolution
the Planning Commission shall hold a Public Hearing on the Draft Plan, as stated in Wis. Stat. 66.1001(4)d. The
hearing must be preceded by a Class 1 notice under ch.985. a minimum of 30 days prior to the hearing.
 At least 30 days before the public hearing is held the Village shall provide written notice to all of the following, as
stated in Wis. Stat. 66.1001(4)e:
o An operator who has obtained, or made application for, a permit that is described under s. 295.12(3)d, within
the jurisdiction of the Village.
o A person who has registered a marketable nonmetallic mineral deposit under s. 295.20 within the jurisdiction
of the Village.
o Any other property owner or leaseholder who has an interest in property pursuant to which the person may
extract nonmetallic mineral resources, if the property owner or leaseholder requests in writing that the Village
of Fox Crossing provide the property owner or leaseholder notice of the hearing.
o Any person who has submitted a request to receive notice of any proposed ordinance that affects the
allowable use of property owned by the person.
 An electronic (CD) copy of the Draft Plan, or notification on how to view/download a copy of the plan online, will be
disseminated to neighboring jurisdictions and appropriate governments, as stated in Wis. Stat. 66.1001 (4)b,
providing 30 days for written comments. A copy of the Draft Plan will be sent to:
o The Clerk for the following local governmental units shall receive a copy of the plan:
• City of Neenah • Town of Clayton
• City of Menasha • Town of Neenah
• City of Appleton • Winnebago County
• Town of Grand Chute • Outagamie County
• Town of Greenville
o Administrators for the Neenah, Menasha, and Appleton School Districts
o Appleton, Menasha, and Neenah Public Libraries
o East Central Regional Planning Commission
o The Wisconsin Department of Administration – Division of Intergovernmental Relations
 Any written comments submitted to the Village by the above-mentioned governing bodies, property owners, or
public, will be read into the minutes during the Public Hearing, evaluated, and incorporated as determined by the
Plan Commission into the Comprehensive Plan. A summary of comments and subsequent action will be provided
upon request.
 The Village Board, by a majority vote, shall enact the ordinance adopting the recommended plan (Wis. Stat.
66.1001(4)c). An electronic (CD) copy of the adopted plan and ordinance, or notification on how to view/download
a copy of the plan online, will be disseminated to the above-mentioned governing bodies, as stated in Wis. Stat.
66.1001(4)b.
Vote: Yes_____ No_____
Adopted this __________ day of ____________________, 2017. Attest:
____________________________ ____________________________
Village President, Dale Youngquist Village Clerk, Karen Backman
PU BL IC I N P U T S U MMARY
The planning process provided four • Family friendly/oriented A final question asked participants
specific opportunities for public "looking 20 years into the future,
• Strategically located in the Fox what are your big ideas and
input on the comprehensive plan
Valley between Appleton and aspirations for our community?
update outside of monthly Planning
Neenah What would you change or
Commission meetings.
• Close to regional retail and
improve?" Common responses or
COMMUNITY SURVEY entertainment areas but with a more
themes that emerged included:
rural/quaint feel than surrounding
An online community survey was cities • Carefully manage new development
completed from July through to protect natural resources and
September of 2017. The survey was • Bordering both sides of Little Lake community feel. Ensure new
hosted online on Survey Monkey and Butte Des Morts development meets (or exceeds)
hard copies were available at Village codes/regulations
Hall. Information regarding the • A community that values
availability of survey was provided via conservation, nature, environment • Add some additional neighborhood
the water billing mailing cycle, press retail businesses (e.g. small to mid-
• Mostly residential with larger office/
releases, emails to recreation program sized grocery or speciality grocery
industrial companies. Most retail
u s e r s, Face book po st s, an d store), but no "big box" or "mall"
needs served by surrounding
announcements at Village Meetings. In developments
communities.
total, 438 individuals responded to the
survey. Highlights of survey responses • No traditional downtown or Village • Diversify housing options (e.g. 55+,
are provided throughout Chapter 3 Center affordable housing, mix of housing
and a complete copy of the survey sizes)
results is provided in Appendix B.
A second question asked • Maintain a sense of community (keep
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT participants "what do you love the west and east sides of Village
MEETING #1 about Fox Crossing? What "connected")
would you protect, enhance, or
An initial public involvement meeting replicate?" Common responses • Make sure that community investment
was held on July 25th, 2017 to provide or themes that emerged included: is balanced between west-side new
the public with an overview of the • Its country feel (west-side). growth and east-side redevelopment
planning project, schedule, objectives, Small town feel. Small nature of
and schedule. In addition, several community • Improve communications to the public
visioning exercises were completed
to gather resident feedback on issues • The park system/recreation
and opportunities of the community. programs
Full descriptions of comments to
Approximately 20-30 people
• Bicycle and pedestrian trails/ each question can be found in
attended the meeting. The
facilities. Wide & off road trails Appendix C.
following is a summary of the
input gathered at the meeting. • The small feel of the community/
doesn't feel like a big city.
The initial exercise asked participants
"how would you describe Fox • Open spaces, green spaces,
Crossing to someone not from woodlands, water resources, wildlife
the region? What is our current habitat
identity?" Common responses
or themes that emerged include: • Dark skies
• A growing community/growing with • Quality of landscaping/design of
room to expand newer office buildings

A second map-based activity The map on page 2-7 provides
provided participants an an overview of the location of all
opportunity to provide specific comments received color coded to
comments regarding: the categories above. In total there
were:
A. Road Improvement. Areas
that you feel are in need of a • 10 comments related to Road
transportation improvement Improvements,
(e.g., road reconstruction, road
widening, road narrowing, • 10 comments related to Bike/
intersection improvement, etc.) Pedestrian Improvements,
B. Bike/Pedestrian • 5 comments related to Public

Improvement. Areas that you feel Safety Concerns,
need a better connection, access
• 4 comments related to
or crossing for pedestrians or bike
Community Assets,
facilities (e.g., on-road bike lane,
off-road path, etc.) • 6 comments related to (Re)
Development Sites,
C. Public Safety Concern. Nodes
or Areas that you feel pose a • 4 comments related to
concern to public safety Preservation Sites,
D. Community Assets. Assets • 2 comments related to Future
in the Village that should be Land Use Changes.
maintained, enhanced, or
replicated Full descriptions of each
comment can be found in
E. (Re)Development Sites. Appendix C.
Parcels or blocks you feel should
be (re)developed and for what
uses.
F. Preservation Sites. Parcels or
areas you feel should be preserved
as undeveloped land over the next
10-20 years or beyond.
G. Future Land Use Changes.
Parcels or areas you feel should be
a different use than is presented
on the Village's current Future
Land Use Map.
Points of Interest from the Public Input Meeting
July 25th 2017
)
"
235C 97A
)
"
157
)
"
)
"
114G 159F
152F 160C )
"
)
" 151A )
"
)
"
)
"
158B 95E96A
141A
)
" )
" )
"
111D 43E
)
"
)
"
148D ")86F )
"
139A
)
"
87F
)
"
71B
)
"
98E )
"
161A 36C
)
" )
"
118B
)
" 42E
)
"
136B 162 )
"
)
"
95E 163E
)
"
)
" "
) 113B 164G
)
"
149B 108D137A 152F
)
" "
) "
) 35C
)
"
)
"
)
"
181B
147A ")142B )
"
72C
)
" )
" "
)183B
106A
)
"
37F 41E
)
"
)
"
182B 110D
)
"
138A
) "
" )
117C
Legend
)
" Points of Input
Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input

2-7
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT quality design and aesthetics • 3.3 (5) Redevelop blighted and
MEETING #2 especially for properties along under-utilized properties along
major transportation corridors, older commercial corridors (e.g.
A second public involvement multi-family developments, Appleton Road, Valley Road,
meeting was held on May 16th, non-residential uses adjacent Oneida Street).
2018 to provide the public with an to single-family residential land
overview of the draft comprehensive uses, and within commercial/ • 3.8 (0) Improve public transit
plan. In addition, two hands on retail areas. services within the Village.
activities allowed participants an
opportunity to provide input on • 2.2 (3) Improve the sustainability A copy of all comments received
the draft Future Land Use Map and energy efficiency of Village for this activity can be found in
and the draft actions items from facilities and services. Appendix C. The feedback from this
Chapter 5. Approximately 30-40 activity was reviewed by the Plan
people attended the meeting. The • 2.4 (4) Develop an outdoor Commission and incorporated into
following is a summary of the input community event space within the final Comprehensive Plan.
gathered at the meeting. a Village park for community
festivals/events. Future Land Use Comments
Implementation Comments A second map-based activity
Participants were provided a list of • 2.9 (2) Consider alternative provided participants an
10 action items for the Village to funding methods to close opportunity to provide specific
pursue over the next 10 to 20 years. transportation funding gaps comments regarding the draft
Participants were asked to rate each (e.g. impact fees, wheel tax, Future Land Use Map. Copies of
action item individually in terms of grants, etc.) to maintain high- each the five Future Land Use -
its importance on a scale of 1 to 5 quality streets, bicycle and Neighborhood Planning District
(1 = high priority, 5 = low priority). pedestrian facilities. Maps (refer to Chapter 4) were
Participants were also asked to available for review and participants
circle their top three actions items. • 3.0 (1) Redevelop blighted were given pre-numbered comment
The following is a summary of the and under-utilized waterfront dots to place on the maps along
comments received. Average ratings properties for higher density with comment forms. Submitted
for each action item are provided, residential, commercial or comments were generally grouped
sorted by highest priority. The mixed uses. according to the following topics:
numbers in parenthesis represent
the number of times a respondent • 3.1 (3) Develop a mixed-use, A. Road Improvement.
indicated an action item was in their pedestrian oriented residential, Areas that are in need of a
top three. retail and entertainment Village transportation improvement
Center. (e.g., road reconstruction, road
Rate # | Action: widening, road narrowing,
• 1.7 (11) Implement the • 3.1 (1) Identify and implement intersection improvement, etc.).
recommendations found within ways in which Fox Crossing can Total responses = 9.
the Village's 2015 Bicycle and brand its own unique identity
Pedestrian Plan (recommended within the broader Fox Valley B. Bike/Pedestrian
routes are shown on the Future region (e.g. stronger "gateway" Improvement. Areas that need
Land Use Maps on each table). features along major roadways, a better connection, access or
outdoor public art and mural crossing for pedestrians or bike
• 1.9 (7) Strengthen the Village’s installations, unique street facilities (e.g., on-road bike lane,
Zoning Ordinance relating signage, community festivals/ off-road path, etc.). Total responses
to site and building design, events, etc). = 14.
lighting, landscaping and
signage to promote higher
C. Public Nuisance/Safety
Concern. Nodes or Areas that
pose a concern to public safety
or are a public nuisance. Total
responses = 9.
D. Community Assets. Assets
in the Village that should be
maintained, enhanced, or
replicated. Total responses = 3
E. (Re)Development Sites.
Parcels or blocks should be (re)
developed and for what uses.
Total responses = 3
F. Preservation Sites. Parcels or
areas that should be preserved
as undeveloped land over the
next 10-20 years or beyond. Total
responses = 15.
G. Future Land Use Changes.
Parcels or areas that should be a
different use than is presented on
the Village's draft Future Land Use
Map. Total responses = 20.
The figure to the right highlights

the location of comments received
within the Southwest Planning
District. The comments are color
coded based on the categories
above. Maps for each planning
district and full descriptions of
each comment can be found in
Appendix C. The feedback from this
activity was reviewed by the Plan
Commission and incorporated into
the final Comprehensive Plan.

Chapter 3 G o a l s, Objec ti ves, Strategies
Ch a pte r 3
Co nte nt s
Goals, Objectives, Strategies
Chapter 3 presents a general vision for the future of the community and
describes the goals, objectives and strategies to achieve the vision for
various planning elements including:
»» Housing
»» Mobility and Transportation
»» Economic Prosperity
»» Natural and Agricultural Resources
»» Community Facilities and Services
»» Collaborations and Partnerships
»» Community Character
»» Land Use
Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-1

Vision S t a t e men t
Chapter 3 identifies the overall Goal: An ideal future condition to with other entities. Policies typically
planning vision that will guide Fox which the community aspires. It is use words like “shall” or “will” to
Crossing land use related decisions usually expressed in general, not designate firm commitments by
over the next ten to twenty years, quantifiable, terms. the Village. All future actions and
along with goals, objectives and decisions made by the Village
strategies to assist the community in Objective: An objective is a should be consistent with these
achieving the vision. Each element statement that identifies a course policies, unless unforeseen
of the Comprehensive Plan contains of action to achieve a goal. They circumstances arise, which make a
goals, objectives and strategies are more specific than goals policy impractical or impossible to
established during the planning and are usually measurable and adhere to. Such occasions should
process based on Plan Commission, attainable through planning and be rare and probably indicate a need
Village Staff and public input, and implementation activities. to amend this plan according to the
the Community Indicators Report procedures identified in Chapter
(Appendix A). Refer to Chapter 4 Strategy: A strategy is a plan of 5, Implementation. Policies using
for specific polices related to the action or policy statement designed the words “should,” “encourage,”
Village’s Future Land Use Plan. to achieve the goals and objectives “discourage,” or “may” are intended
Definitions for goals, objective and of the plan. Not all strategies will to serve as a guide for Village
strategies are given below. be implemented by the Village and decisions and actions.
some may require collaboration
COMMUNITY VISION
The Village of Fox Crossing is a model of sustainable growth and development. The
Village is a regional employment center with a diversity of large office and light industrial
businesses that provide for a resilient local economy. Retail developments are modest
in size, unique in design and accessible by foot and bike. A variety of housing choices
exist and every neighborhood has high-quality parks linked by a network of bike and
pedestrian facilities. The Village is a safe and family-friendly community.
HO USI NG
2. E ncourage housing diversity

GOAL and affordability. Consider the
use of both regulatory measures ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
Households and individuals with and incentives to encourage the
different needs and income levels development of affordable and The planning process revealed the
will be able to find housing in Fox senior housing integrated with following issues and opportunities related
Crossing. market-rate housing. Inclusionary to housing that inform this plan for the
housing ordinances can provide future of Fox Crossing. These statements
OBJECTIVES incentives to developers for are drawn from Plan Commission
certain percentages of affordable discussions and public input and do not
or senior housing units (e.g. represent policy decisions. The list is
a. Provide a diversity of housing
a density bonus allowing for meant as a summary of key points and
opportunities in the Village.
more total units than otherwise not a list all issues or opportunities raised
b. Identify the most suitable areas permitted). during the planning process.
for new residential uses on the
Future Land Use Map and guide 3. W h e n n e w r e s i d e n t i a l Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
the density and unit mix of new developments are proposed, • Stratification of housing quality
residential development to those require a cohesive mix of lot sizes between older and newer portions of
areas. and unit types and incorporate the Village.
more flexibility into residential
c. M a i n t a i n attractive zoning districts in an effort to • Raising cost of housing, including
neighborhoods that have safe promote and expand the diversity rental costs may make it difficult for
and convenient access to daily of housing options in the Village. segments of the population to find
education, retail and recreation For example, rather than create affordable housing.
needs. uniform residential subdivisions,
incorporate higher density • Regulation of restrictive covenants
STRATEGIES developments such as duplexes, not being enforced by neighborhood
triplexes or four-plexes along associations. Lack of knowledge
1. Within the Future Land Use plan major roadways and intersections regarding covenants for new home
and Village Zoning Ordinances, within a single family subdivision. buyers.
provide opportunities for a variety In addition, developers should
of housing densities, styles, lot vary the sizes of single family • Mixed-use housing options are
sizes, building sizes and unit lots and buildings within large limited. Lack of senior housing.
mixes. subdivisions to provide a variety
of housing and afforability Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
options. Also, when new multi- • Lots of room for new housing
family apartment buildings are expansion on the west side.
proposed, require inclusion of
59%
a mixture of efficiency, one- • Wide variety of existing housing
bedroom, two-bedroom and choices.
three-bedroom units within the
building. • Neighborhoods are safe and most of
convenient access to parks.
of survey respondents "agree" 4. Higher density residential uses
or "strongly agree" the Village should typically be placed along • Incorporation provides greater zoning
should provide opportunities collector roads and as transitions authority to regulate housing at the
for affordable housing between single-family and local level.
commercial developments.

5. New residential developments 6. Areas not within the Village, but 7. Encourage the preservation and
should be located in areas of within the Village’s extraterritorial rehabilitation of the community’s
the Village where there is safe plat review area, should not be existing housing stock,
pedestrian and bicycle access subdivided or developed for particularly historical structures,
to commercial and recreational housing in a manner which will through the creation of a local
facilities, transpor tation prevent the logical, cohesive housing rehabilitation program.
systems, schools, employment and cost efficient expansion
opportunities and other necessary of the Village. Preserving land 8. Stabilize and maintain the existing
facilities and services. Sidewalks areas around the Village for housing stock in a safe, healthy and
or paved multi-modal trails shall urban development will allow attractive manner by creating and
be integrated and provided by more logical and cost efficient enforcing property maintenance
developers in new subdivision extensions of municipal codes, developing funding
proposals. utilities and will help to avoid programs, applying for grants
suburban sprawl and leap frog that are geared toward housing
development. The creation of rehabilitation and maintenance,
unsewered subdivisions within and buffering residential areas
the Sewer Service Area shall not from incompatible land uses.
occur within the Village.
26%
of survey respondents who
78%
identify as renters spend 30% or of survey respondents would
more of their gross monthly seek single family housing if
household income on they were to move in the
rent next 5 years
M OB I LI T Y A ND TRAN SP ORTATION
f. Increase access to transit facilities.

GOAL ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
g. M aintain local transportation
Provide and maintain a safe, facilities in a good and safe The planning process revealed the
convenient, efficient and condition. following issues and opportunities related
environmentally sound multi- to mobility and transportation that inform
modal transportation network that STRATEGIES this plan for the future of Fox Crossing.
balances the needs of all users. These statements are drawn from Plan
Commission discussions and public input
1. C oordinate transpor tation
OBJECTIVES projects with the Village's and do not represent policy decisions. The
list is meant as a summary of key points
Comprehensive Plan as well as
and not a list all issues or opportunities
a. Local transportation systems will with the regional transportation
raised during the planning process.
be well coordinated with regional system through coordinated
systems and investments. intergovernmental long-range
Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
transportation and land use
b. Ensure adequate and appropriate planning. • Condition of local roadways,
right-of-way dedication for inadequate funding/state aid.
existing and future streets, bicycle 2. Utilize Official Mapping powers
and pedestrian facilities as land is to coordinate long-term facility • Existing paved trails do not all connect
platted. planning in the Village and to form an integrate loop.
surrounding extraterritorial plat
c. Future land uses should be located review area. At a minimum, the • Train horns/noise in residential areas.
to compliment adjacent existing Village will review and update
and proposed transportation the Village’s Official Street Map • Poor cross-town connection due to
facilities. on an annual basis in order to lake and Village boarders.
reserve adequate rights-of-
d. Transportation facilities and
way for future reconstructed or • Adequate funding for expansion of
investments will balance the
newly constructed streets, and transit services.
needs of all users.
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
e. Grow the Village’s network of
3. Encourage a connected, flexible • Reconstruction of STH 41/441 to
off-road bike and pedestrian
street grid that promotes improve access and development in
facilities. Biking and walking in
Complete Street principles and the Village.
the Village will be safe, enjoyable
Safe Routes to Schools. Dead-end
and efficient.
streets and cul-de-sacs should be • Proximity to Appleton International
avoided to the extent possible. Airport, railroads, recreational trails,
An area development plan must etc.
be submitted as a condition of
30%
all subdivision review in order • Village has been expanding its
to ensure that proposed new network of off-road recreational trails.
streets can connect to adjacent Existing Bike & Pedestrian Plan and
properties in a logical method Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation
and to avoid unnecessary cul- Plan to continue to build on this
of survey respondents bike for de-sacs and loops that increase momentum.
exercise at least once per maintenance costs and reduce
week mobility.

4. New roads, sidewalks and trails maintenance of roads and other 12. E n s u re t h at p e d e s t r i a n
shall be built according to Village transportation facilities. Annual crossings at major intersections
standards and inspected before transportation investments are properly designed to provide
accepted for dedication. should include funding for both safety and convenience to
traditional road improvements those crossing these heavily
5. W h e n c o n s i d e r i n g n e w and alternative transportation traveled streets. Consider the
development proposals, the modes, such as on-road bicycle use of traffic calming measures
Village may require development accommodations, off-road bike and crosswalk enhancements
agreements that define the and pedestrian trails, sidewalks such as Rectangular Rapid Flash
responsibilities of the Village, and transit facilities. Beacons, Hawk Beacons, painted
the developer and other crosswalks, raised crosswalks,
agencies regarding any required speed tables, speed bumps,
improvements (e.g. turn lanes, pedestrian crossing signage,
traffic lights, etc.) to Village sidewalk bumpouts, or crossing
streets and funding of such The most pressing flags.
improvements. The Village may transportation issue for
also require that the property survey respondents was 13. Require new development to
owner, or their agent, fund the
preparation of a traffic impact maintenance on provide off-street parking and
loading facilities. Encourage
analysis by an independent
professional prior to approving local roads shared parking arrangements
between adjacent land uses
new development to assess (not state highways or county whenever possible. Consider
traffic impacts from proposed roads) the use of both reduced
development. minimum and maximum off-
street parking requirements in
6. Where appropriate, the Village Zoning Ordinances to reduce the
may designate weight restrictions, development of under utilized
truck routes, access restrictions 9. Implement the recommendations parking lots.
and speed limits to protect local found within the Village’s 2015
streets and improve traffic flow Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 14. Consider alternative funding
and safety. methods to close transportation
10. I m p r o v e w a l k a b i l i t y funding gaps (e.g. impact fees,
7. R equire all new development and sidewalks in existing wheel tax, grants, etc.) to maintain
along existing and proposed neighborhoods that lack these high-quality streets, bicycle and
transit corridors to be designed amenities, with a priority toward pedestrian facilities.
so that it can be easily and installing or repairing existing
conveniently served with bus sidewalks or multi-modal trails 15. Require off-site improvements
or other transit systems. Site along collector streets or near for new developments that ensure
plan reviews should include a schools and parks. The Village that these new developments do
thorough analysis of whether or may accept the use of multi- not degrade the service levels of
not the proposed development modal trails in lieu of sidewalks the public roads they will impact.
is designed in a manner that will in new developments.
allow it to be served by transit 16. Establish minimum levels of
vehicles (e.g. buses, car pools, 11. Promote multi-modal trail service for all transportation
vans, rail, etc.). development that will ensure facilities within the Village.
that most neighborhoods in the
8. Maintain a rolling 5-year Capital Village are located within ¼ to ½
Improvement Plan to plan for mile (five to ten minute walk) of a
the annual construction and public park facility.
EC ON OMI C P R O SP E RITY
enhancing the quality of life of the

GOAL community. ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
Retain, expand, create and attract e. Diversify the local economic The planning process revealed the
businesses that strengthen and base so that it keeps pace with following issues and opportunities related
diversify the local economy, grow the realities of a rapidly changing to economic prosperity that inform this
the tax base and enhance employee world economy and does not plan for the future of Fox Crossing.
wages and benefits. become threatened by economic These statements are drawn from Plan
down turns in various sectors of Commission discussions and public input
OBJECTIVES the industrial economic base (e.g. and do not represent policy decisions. The
paper industry). list is meant as a summary of key points
and not a list all issues or opportunities
a. Support the development of
f. Create economic development raised during the planning process.
high quality business parks and
opportunities along the riverfront
the development of a mixed-use
for higher density residential and Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
pedestrian-oriented community
mixed uses. • Limited tourism to support the local
commercial center.
economy.
b. R etain and expand existing STRATEGIES
commercial establishments and • Limited neighborhood/daily services
industries. 1. The Village may consider the use of businesses (e.g. grocery store). Most
retail development is in adjacent
public land acquisition to expand
c. Take full advantage of the communities. Lack of retail within
the industrial and commercial tax
economic development walking or biking distance from most
base or to rehabilitate blighted
possibilities associated with the neighborhoods.
or contaminated properties. The
Village's access and proximity
Village may offer incentives such as
to regional rail lines, Appleton • As a new Village, there is limited name
grants, low interest loans, low cost
International Airport, the regional recognition outside of the fox valley.
land sales, public infrastructure
highways and waterway systems.
improvements and tax increment
d. Fox Crossing’s retail sector financing to encourage economic
• Solid base of industrial and office
will continue to expand and development (i.e. business
development within the community.
diversify thereby reducing retention, expansion and
consumer spending leakage, attraction). Incentives should not
• Lots of room for growth of businesses
increasing consumer choices and exceed public benefits received.
on the west side. Attracting new large
2. Ensure industrial or commercial businesses such as Secura Insurance
businesses that generate large headquarters.
67%
volumes of traffic or wastewater,
or have a high water demand • With incorporation the ability to
locate where a full range of leverage the use of tax increment
compatible utilities, services, financing to create new business parks
roads and other infrastructure or redevelop older portions of the
can be provided to adequately Village in need of rehabilitation.
of survey respondents think the support such developments.
Village should develop a mixed- • Business friendly climate .
use, pedestrian oriented retail
and entertainment • Restaurant/brew pub on waterfront.
"Village Center" Desire to attract strategic small-scale
retail development.

3. Areas not within the Village, but 6. Encourage the use of innovative
within the Village’s extraterritorial regional economic development
plat review area, should not be strategies and tax base sharing
subdivided or developed for non- tools in the Fox Cities region.
agricultural based businesses in
a manner which will prevent 7. E ncourage intergovernmental
the logical, cohesive and cost cooperation and coordination
efficient expansion of the Village. in the area of economic
Preserving land areas around the development.
Village for urban development
8. I dentify oppor tunities to
will allow more logical and cost
redevelop blighted and under
efficient extensions of municipal
utilized waterfront properties for
utilities and will help to avoid
higher density residential and
urban sprawl and leap frog
mixed uses, including commercial
development.
developments such as restaurants.
4. C reate a marketing plan to Top Six Desired
recruit new industries based on Retail Businesses
the Village's unique locational According to the
attributes, skilled labor force and Community Survey:
full range of municipal services.
1. Sit-down Restaurants
5. D iversify the mix ture of 2. Grocery Store
commercial and service uses in 3. Coffee Shop
the Village to meet unmet market 4. Bakery
niches and better serve existing 5. Specialty/Local Food Store
neighborhoods. 6. Brew Pub
N A T U R AL AN D AGRICU LTU RAL
R ES OU R C E S
GOAL STRATEGIES ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
Preserve and improve natural 1. Utilize the Future Land Use Map The planning process revealed the
features and amenities for the and local Zoning Ordinance, following issues and opportunities
benefit of present and future Subdivision Ordinance, Shoreland related to natural & agricultural resources
generations. and Shoreland-Wetland Zoning that inform this plan for the future of Fox
Crossing. These statements are drawn
Overlays, Floodplain Ordinance
OBJECTIVES and Official Map to identify and from Plan Commission discussions and
public input and do not represent policy
protect environmental corridors
decisions. The list is meant as a summary
a. Protect environmental corridors from incompatible development.
of key points and not a list all issues or
(e.g. floodplains, natural
opportunities raised during the planning
drainage ways, wetlands, open 2. R e q u i r e ( r e ) d e v e l o p m e n t
process.
water, steep slopes >20%, projects to include stormwater
mature woodlands > 1 acre) management facilities as
Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
from development to improve approved by the Village, to
• Limited public access to waterfront.
fish and wildlife habitat, water meet applicable local and state
quality and reduce stormwater regulations.
• Water clarity of Little Lake Butte des
management problems and other
Morts
environmental problems caused 3. N ative landscaping shall be
by improper development. installed around stormwater • Limited managed natural areas.
ponds to provide wildlife habitat
b. Maintain and improve air, land and to improve the aesthetics of • Noise from quarry blasting.
and water quality to ensure the ponds.
compliance with state and
national standards. 4. All site plans, preliminary plats • Village has been making allowances
and certified survey maps shall for community gardens, urban
c. Support urban agricultural
accurately depict all natural bees and chickens to support local
practices compatible with their
resource features that are found agriculture.
surroundings.
on the site for the purpose of
determining compliance with this • Good land ethic of the public.
plan and local ordinances. Community values sustainable
development, conservation of natural
resources and the environment.
95%
• Amble green space/parks.
• Fox River and Little Lake Butte des

Morts.
• Future reuse of existing quarry

of survey respondents "agree" operations for natural and recreational
or "strongly agree" the Village uses.
should identify and protect
environmentally sensitive • West side has a country feel. Village
areas doesn't feel like a large city.

5. Encourage the preservation of 8. I mplement ordinances that
mature woodlands and heritage encourage urban agriculture (e.g.
trees through the use of cluster urban bee keeping, keeping of
development zoning techniques chickens, etc.) while minimizing
and landscaping ordinances nuisances to adjacent land
that minimize impacts to these owners.
resources during site design and
construction of new development. 9. S upport the development of
community gardens, farmer’s
6. Maintain a list of preferred native markets, road side stands, on-site
plants and trees for installation accessory farm sales and similar
on public and private properties. initiatives that connect residents
83%
When installing new street terrace to local food.
trees, trees within parks or when
approving private development
plans, encourage a mix of at least
three types of native tree species
to mitigate future complete tree
loss from one specific insect or of survey respondents "agree"
disease. or "strongly agree" the Village
should preserve space for urban
7. E mploy a comprehensive agriculture and integrate it into
management approach for solid new developments
and organic wastes and recyclable
materials.
COM MU N I T Y F ACILITIE S
A ND S E R VI C E S
basis, rather than as a series of
GOAL individual projects, and locate ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
and size utilities with enough
Provide residents and businesses capacity to serve adjacent future The planning process revealed the
with sufficient, reliable and high growth. Continue to clean, repair following issues and opportunities related
quality public services, utilities and or replace undersized or outdated to community facilities and services that
facilities. sewer mains as part of capital inform this plan for the future of Fox
improvement planning. Prior to Crossing. These statements are drawn
OBJECTIVES approving new development from Plan Commission discussions and
proposals, review sewer service public input and do not represent policy
a. Public/private utilities and treatment capacities to ensure decisions. The list is meant as a summary
facilities will be managed to sufficient capacity is available of key points and not a list all issues or
meet or exceed professional to serve existing and projected opportunities raised during the planning
and governmental standards to development. process.
protect and enhance public health 2. Water: Water quality standards will Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
and the natural environment. be strictly adhered to, including • Limited awareness of existing
b. Public facilities will continue both drinking water standards facilities and services available in the
to meet the needs of residents and standards for stormwater community.
and businesses, especially as returned to the source. Monitor
new development increases the the quality and quantity of • Lack of social media presence.
demand for those facilities and water pumped from municipal
services. wells to ensure the needs of the • No library within the Village.
community are met in terms
c. L a n d u s e p l a n n i n g a n d of health and sustainability. • Lack of a center community park/
development will support the Encourage programs and community recreation complex for
efficiency and fiscal sustainability development techniques that civic events, indoor and outdoor
of energy, sewer, water and support water conservation and recreation.
stormwater systems. both groundwater protection
and recharge. The Village may Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
d. A ll residents will have access restrict certain types of land uses • The use of renewable energy
to open space and recreational from locating within proximity initiatives within the community.
activities. of municipal wells if they pose a Active Sustainability Committee
threat to the water supply. The leading initiatives.
e. Infrastructure maintenance Village will continue to repair and
and construction projects will replace undersized or outdated • Fox Crossing provides phenomenal
be scheduled and financed to water mains and water meters community services at a high value
maximize cost efficiency and following a capital improvement compared to taxation. Great police,
minimize cost fluctuation for plan. fire, utility, refuse collection, parks, etc.
taxpayers.
3. S tormwater: Require new • Great public and private schools
STRATEGIES d e ve l o p m e n t t o i n c l u d e
storm drainage as part of • Low debt
the development proposal.
1. S anitary Sewer: Encourage Developers will be responsible for • Growing recreational trail system.
logical, cost-efficient expansion of erosion control and stormwater
sanitary sewer to serve compact quality and quantity control both
development patterns. Plan for during and after site preparation
sewer extensions on a system and construction activities in

accordance with applicable local businesses. Consider the
local and state regulations. creation of a leaf composting
87%
Encourage the use of best practice facility. Encourage participation in
stormwater management devices recycling and clean-up programs
that improve the quality and for the disposal of expired
reduce the quantity of runoff (e.g. medicines, paint and hazardous
rain gardens, infiltration basins, materials. Provide information
vegetated swales) in the design about clean-up programs to
of stormwater management residents and businesses at least of survey respondents "agree"
plans and a general effort to once annually. or "strongly agree" the Village
reduce the amount of impervious should expand its use
surfaces within new or existing 6. Power Plants, Transmission Lines of alternative and
developments. and Telecommunication Facilities: renewable energy
Work with representatives from
4. Utility Services and Extensions: the various providers to raise
New utilities and municipal awareness of local concerns 7. Energy
infrastructure will not represent during the planning and siting Conservation: Support the
an unreasonable cost to the of any major transmission lines, efforts of energy providers,
Village - development will pay its facilities, natural gas lines, wind government agencies and others,
fair share. Urban services will be towers or telecommunication to inform residents about energy
required for all new developments towers in the area. If such facilities conservation measures. The use
in the Village, including municipal are proposed, they should be of energy-efficient materials or
water, wastewater and stormwater located in an area safely away designs is highly encouraged
management systems. Non-farm from existing or planned for new building construction.
development not served by residential areas and should avoid Consider the use of energy
public sanitary sewer and water environmentally sensitive areas. efficient alternatives when
is discouraged within the plat Underground placement and upgrading public buildings or
review jurisdiction of the Village, co-location (or corridor sharing) equipment. Work with energy
except as approved through of utilities is encouraged and the providers and land owners to
intergovernmental planning or Village may investigate the costs support appropriate applications
related agreements, consistent of burying utility lines as part of of renewable energy and
with adopted Comprehensive street (re)construction projects utilization of on-site distributed
Plans and designed to potentially to improve the aesthetics of the energy generation (e.g., solar,
accommodate the long-term community. wind, geothermal, biomass, solid
retrofitting of public services
into the development. In areas
not served by municipal sewer
and water, the Village requires
adherence to the Wisconsin
Sanitary Code.
5. S olid Waste and Recycling:
Annually review levels of service
provided by the contracted solid
waste disposal and recycling
services and meet with them
as necessary to address any
concerns raised by residents or
waste) as a means of protecting levels with the appropriate connectivity of local parks
the Village against future departments/agencies annually. and recreational facilities with
fluctuations in energy costs, in New equipment purchases regional facilities, via bicycle and
accordance with WI State Statute will be coordinated through pedestrian trails or marked routes
66.0401. capital improvement planning. on existing roads. Require all
Encourage opportunities for cost proposed residential subdivision
8. Schools: Collaborate with the sharing and intergovernmental developments to dedicate land, or
Menasha and Neenah School cooperation on emergency pay a fee in lieu thereof, for public
Districts and post-secondary services with adjacent parks, recreation and open space
institutions, such as technical municipalities. acquisition and development (in
colleges, to provide high accordance with State Statute) to
quality educational facilities 11. Special Needs Facilities: Work ensure all neighborhoods have
and opportunities for Village with adjacent communities to access to public park facilities
residents. Actively participate maintain and improve access or trails. Refer to the Village’s
in the planning and siting of to special needs facilities (e.g. CORP for additional guidance on
any new school facility in the health care, senior care, etc.) park policies and strategies for
community or the adaptive for area residents. Collaborate implementation.
reuse of decommissioned school with local non-profits and social
properties. Collaborate with service agencies to ensure there 13. Capital Improvement Planning:
area schools to maximize the are adequate resources for all Maintain a rolling five year Capital
community’s capital investment residents and that service is fair Improvement Plan to assist
in school facilities by making and equitable. with annual scheduling and
those facilities readily available, budgeting of infrastructure and
as feasible, for other uses that 12. Par ks: I mplement the equipment maintenance, repair
support social interaction and recommendations within and replacement.
health within the community, t h e V i l l a g e’s 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 2 1
such as community meetings, Comprehensive Outdoor
neighborhood festivals, youth and Recreation Plan (CORP) and
adult sports. Support community update the plan every five years
improvement projects that to maintain eligibility for park
promote Safe Routes to Schools. acquisition and improvement
grants. Encourage the
9. Libraries: Collaborate with the
surrounding local Public Libraries
-- Appleton, Neenah and Menasha Top Six
-- to maintain and improve access Desired Park and
to public library facilities and Recreation Amenities
services for Fox Crossing residents. According to the Community
Survey:
10. Emergency Services: The
Village will work through 1. Off-Road Walking/Biking Trails
its Police Department, Fire 2. Dog Park
Department and EMS staff and 3. Nature Preserve
volunteers to maintain adequate 4. Outdoor Pool
provision of emergency services 5. Splash Pad
(i.e. police, fire, ambulance) 6. Lake/Shoreline
for residents and businesses. Restoration
R eview ser vice provision

CO L L A B O R AT I O N S AN D
PA R T NE R S H I P S
3. Provide adjacent municipalities,
GOAL Outagamie and Winnebago ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
counties, with a copy of this land
Maintain mutually beneficial use plan and an opportunity The planning process revealed the
relationships and partnerships to provide comments prior to following issues and opportunities related
with neighboring municipalities, adoption or future amendments. to collaborations and partnerships that
counties, State and Federal Agencies, inform this plan for the future of Fox
non-profit groups, and the schools, 4. W h e re i nte rg ove r n m e nt a l Crossing. These statements are drawn
colleges and universities serving cooperation efforts do not yield from Plan Commission discussions and
Fox Crossing residents. mutually agreeable results, the public input and do not represent policy
Village may utilize its zoning, decisions. The list is meant as a summary
OBJECTIVES subdivision, official mapping and of key points and not a list all issues or
extraterritorial zoning and plat opportunities raised during the planning
review powers where necessary process.
a. Wo r k w i t h n e i g h b o r i n g to protect Village interests and
communities to limit sprawl and coordinate development in the Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
promote orderly development. Village’s extraterritorial plat • Lawsuits filed by adjacent
b. F o s t e r c o o p e r a t i o n a n d review area. communities during the Village's
coordination in the provision of 5. Develop urban service phasing
incorporation process creating tension
services where efficiency, equity plans that are coordinated
between communities.
and economies of scale can be with the land use, utility and
obtained with other entities. transportation plans prepared
• Impacts on development due to
Outagamie County Airport Overlay
c. Reduce costs and improve quality by the East Central Wisconsin Zoning Ordinance.
of municipal services through Regional Planning Commission
partnerships with neighboring (ECWRPC) and Chapter 4 of this • Finding/engaging residents in
towns, municipalities and plan. community projects or filling
counties. 6. Coordinate the installation of bike committees.
d. S upport public involvement and pedestrian infrastructure

with adjacent municipalities • Irregular municipal boundaries on
in Village meetings and the the east side of the Village difficult to
development of Village plans and to provide interconnectivity
consistent with the Appleton discern which community you are in
ordinances. and presents challenges for service
Transportation Management
Area & Oshkosh Metropolitan delivery.
STRATEGIES Planning Organization Bicycle
and Pedestrian Plan prepared by Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
ECWRPC. • The ability to reduce redundancy
1. E ncourage an efficient and
of services because of proximity to
compatible land use pattern that
minimizes conflicts between land 7. Participate, review, monitor, and neighboring communities.
uses across municipal boundaries comment on pending plans
and preserves natural resources in from neighboring municipalities, • Existing service agreements
mutually agreed areas. counties, regional and state and partnerships with adjacent
agencies on land use and planning communities for fire, police, sewer
2. Coordinate Official Mapping in activities that would affect Fox services.
extraterritorial plat review areas Crossing.
with adjacent municipalities. • Road repair cost sharing.
• Municipal Boundary Agreements
8. The Village shall designate staff
to act as liaisons with adjacent
municipalities, Outagamie and
Winnebago counties and other
regional, state and federal
84%
agencies and attend regional
meetings to represent the
interests of the Village.
9. C ollaborate with local and
regional service organizations
on fundraising and community of survey respondents agree
improvement projects. or strongly agree that it is
important for the Village to
10. Pursue coordination with remain connected to the
school districts to include student Valley Transit System
representation and involvement
in Board, commission and
committee meetings to foster the
next generation of Village leaders.
11. Encourage the creation of
a business association that
will support the Village of Fox
Crossing.

CO MMU NI T Y C H ARACTE R
including removal of “junk”

GOAL materials. In cooperation with ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
the Village Police Department,
Preserve the quaint character of actively enforce code violations The planning process revealed the
Fox Crossing and enhance the related to building, zoning following issues and opportunities related
community’s identity within the and property maintenance to community character that inform
Fox Valley as a model for sustainable ordinances. this plan for the future of Fox Crossing.
growth and development. These statements are drawn from Plan
2. When restrictive covenants are Commission discussions and public input
OBJECTIVES proposed by developers require and do not represent policy decisions. The
copies to be filed with the County list is meant as a summary of key points
Register of Deeds and maintain and not a list all issues or opportunities
a. Maintain safe buildings and copies on file with the Village. raised during the planning process.
properties, which support the Create a map of properties that are
health of Village residents. included under existing restrictive Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
b. I mprove the aesthetics along covenants with hyperlinks to • Lack of a singular identity to the
key community entry ways such those covenants. Make the map community, especially with new
as STH 441/USH 10, USH 41 and available under the Community incorporation.
CTH CB. Development portion of the
Village’s website. • No annual community events aside
c. Improve the aesthetics and from Summer Safety Night.
quality of new and existing sites 3. Develop a cohesive and attractive
and buildings within the Village. sense of place along community • Limited tourism.
gateways by implementing
STRATEGIES unique public streetscaping • No cultural center, museum or
improvements (e.g. decorative historical society.
lighting, landscaping, wayfinding,
1. E nforce zoning and building street and gateway signage) and • No true "Village Center" or mixed-use
codes that require inspection of requiring higher quality private gathering place.
new structures and remediation development site and building
of unsafe and unsanitary property designs. Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
or housing conditions. Work with
4. E nforce development design • Rebrand the community with a new
property owners to improve
guidelines and standards for identity, logo, tagline, etc.
the appearance of properties,
new development, especially
multi-family, commercial and • Variety or parks and recreation
industrial developments to programs.
ensure high quality design that
64%
will maintain neighborhood • Implement zoning ordinance
character, property values and amendments such as non-intrusive
aesthetics over time. Strengthen outdoor lighting and high-quality site
the Village’s Zoning Ordinance and building designs the maintain
relating to site and building attractive properties and buildings.
design, lighting, landscaping
of survey respondents believe and signage to promote higher
Fox Crossing should do more quality design and aesthetics
to visually set itself apart especially for properties along
from surrounding transportation corridors, adjacent
to single-family residential land 6. P rovide a distinctive and
uses, and within the Village Center. consistent street and directional
61%
signage system throughout the
5. Support year round community Village. The directional signage
events and programs that system should guide travelers
celebrate the Village of to key activity centers such
Fox Crossing and promote as the new Village Center,
community pride while providing waterfront recreation areas,
opportunities for business of survey respondents believe
commercial districts, parks,
tourism. there should be more art/cultural
schools, office centers and
events hosted in the Village
industrial parks.

L A N D U SE
GOAL STRATEGIES ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
Maintain an adequate supply 1. Maintain a Future Land Use Plan The planning process revealed the
of municipally serviced land (Chapter 4) to identify appropriate following issues and opportunities related
to accommodate growth, in areas for residential, commercial, to land use that inform this plan for the
residential, commercial and industrial, institutional and future of Fox Crossing. These statements
industrial uses, located in an environmental uses within the are drawn from Plan Commission
orderly, planned and sustainable Village and its extraterritorial discussions and public input and do not
manner. plat review jurisdiction based represent policy decisions. The list is
meant as a summary of key points and
on proximity to compatible land
OBJECTIVES uses, transportation facilities and not a list all issues or opportunities raised
during the planning process.
public utilities.
a. Grow the tax base and population
of the Village at a moderate and 2. Review proposed developments Issues/Weaknesses/Liabilities:
sustainable pace. within the Village’s extraterritorial • Minimum waterfront commercial and
plat review jurisdiction for recreation areas.
b. Protect areas identified in this consistency with this plan and the
plan for future Village expansion Village’s subdivision ordinances • Aging commercial and industrial
from development that is and provide comments to properties and businesses that may
incompatible with this plan or neighboring communities as be negatively impacting surrounding
that would encumber orderly necessary in the interests of the neighborhoods.
Village expansion. Village.
• Knowledge and compliance with
c. Use land, utilities and community 3. M aintain an Official Map to neighborhood association restrictive
services as efficiently as possible. coordinate long-term facility covenants.
planning (e.g. roads, utilities,
d. E nsure high qualit y and parks, drainage areas, etc.) in • Challenges due to division of
aesthetically pleasing the Village and surrounding community by Little Lake Butte des
development compatible with extraterritorial plat review area Morts.
surrounding land uses. and to protect these areas from
development. • No true "Village Center" or mixed-use
e. Redevelop vacant, blighted or
gathering place.
under-utilized properties. 4. Any development with uses more
intensive than neighboring uses, Opportunities/Strengths/Assets:
particularly residential uses, will • Plenty of opportunity to expand on
utilize architecture, siting and west side.
20%
• Business friendly community.
• Control of local zoning, annexation

and extraterritorial review.
of survey respondents believe • Location to larger metro areas

noise control in Fox Crossing is but still save and family oriented
"poor" neighborhoods.
screening techniques to minimize Include the map on the Village’s 10. Through detailed land use plans,
negative impacts on neighboring website along with zoning permit determine the highest and best
properties due to noise, light, application forms. use of vacant or under-utilized
traffic, etc. or incompatible properties within the Village (e.g.
architectural designs. 8. E n c o u r a g e e f f i c i e n t a n d Valley Road corridor, Appleton
s u s t a i n a b l e d e ve l o p m e n t road corridor, former quarries)
5. Work with property owners patterns through the use of and prioritize these properties for
to clean up contaminated or innovative zoning techniques, (re)development and investment
blighted sites that threaten the land use, transportation and through the creation of new TIF
public health, safety and welfare utility planning tools such as districts.
and to redevelop these sites to planned unit developments and
productive uses. Prevent new cluster zoning.
occurrences of these types of
properties. 9. C onsider the use of both
regulator y measures and
6. I n f i l l d e v e l o p m e n t a n d incenc tives to encourage
redevelopment of under-utilized the incorporation of energy
properties where Village roads efficiency, alternative energy, or
and utilities already exist is a other sustainability measures
56%
priority for the Village and is within proposed developments.
strongly encouraged. For example, providing density
bonuses for the use of on-site
7. U pdate the Village’s Official solar panels, geothermal
Zoning Map at least once per buildings, rain gardens, or
year to ensure the map accurately community gardens. of survey respondents think the
reflects any zoning amendments pace of Retail development in
completed in the prior year. the Village is too slow

Chapter 4 Fu tu re L a n d Use
Ch a pte r 4
Co nte nt s
Future Land Use
Chapter 4 outlines the desired future land use for Fox Crossing and the
surrounding planning area, including categories of land uses, development
densities and design strategies consistent with the goals, objectives, and
strategies of Chapter 3. This chapter includes the following sections:
»» Future Land Use Guide

»» Using the Future Land Use Map
»» Amending the Future Land Use Map
»» Interpreting Boundaries
»» Planning Districts
»» Future Land Use Categories
»» Rural Lands & Urban Reserve
»» Low Density Residential
»» Medium Density Residential
»» High Density Residential
»» Neighborhood Mixed Use
»» Commercial
»» Industrial
»» Government, Institutional & Utilities
»» Parks, Recreation & Conservancy
»» Natural Resource Protection Overlay
Chapter 4 | Future Land Use 4-1

FUTUR E L A ND U SE G U I DE
USING THE FUTURE STATEMENT OF INTENT & POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
LAND USE MAP TYPICAL USES ZONING DISTRICTS
The Future Land Use Map (refer to The future land use categories The future land use classifications
page 4-4 and Appendix C) contains identify areas by their primary identify those existing Village of
different land use categories that intended uses, character and Fox Crossing Zoning Districts that
together illustrate the Village’s land densities (herein described as are “consistent” within each future
use vision. These categories, and “Statement of Intent & Typical Uses”). land use category (herein described
associated policies, are described These classifications are not zoning as “Potentially Acceptable Zoning
in the succeeding pages, including districts - they do not legally set Districts”). The list of potentially
explanation of the Village’s intent, performance criteria for land uses acceptable zoning districts will
zoning, design and development (i.e. setbacks, height restrictions, be used by the Village to confirm
strategies for each. etc.) nor are they intended to list whether requests for rezoning of
every possible use that may be property are generally consistent
This plan includes one Village- permitted within the future land with this plan. Areas subject to
wide Future Land Use Map (refer use classification. Village zoning districts include
to Appendix C) along with several all lands located within the
“District Maps”. District Maps are Parcels on the Future Land Use Village of Fox Crossing municipal
scaled to enable more detailed Map are identified by their primary boundary. Areas outside the
illustrations of the locations intended uses; however, some municipal boundary, but within
throughout the Village where of the parcels on the Future Land the Village’s extraterritorial plat
residential, mixed-use, commercial, Use Map have yet to be platted or review jurisdiction are subject to
industrial, public, open and park subdivided. The Village recognizes the Village’s Subdivision Ordinance
spaces should be located (refer to that detailed site planning to identify in addition to applicable county
pages 4-5 through 4-10). Other than precisely how larger unplatted or local township zoning and land
the difference in layout design the parent parcels (herein referred to division regulations.
location of future land uses on the as “unplatted new development
District Maps are identical to the areas”) may be subdivided, zoned The list of potentially acceptable
Village-wide Map. and developed is outside of the zoning districts includes an
scope of a comprehensive plan. identification of “primar y ”,
The Future Land Use Map presents Given this limitation, the Village’s “secondary”, or “tertiary” zoning
recommended future land uses for desire to provide developers site districts. These notations provide
the Village of Fox Crossing and its planning flexibility, and the desire additional guidance to the Village
extraterritorial jurisdiction. This to encourage compatible mixed and applicants regarding the relative
map, along with the associated use developments, the Village has mix, or priority of acceptability/
policies, will be a basis for land identified the maximum percentage consistency of zoning intended
development decisions and are to be of secondary future land use within each future land use category.
consulted whenever development is categories that may be included Proposed zoning amendments
proposed, especially when a zoning in future site specific development to a zoning district identified as
change or land division is requested. proposals. The Village may create “secondary” or “tertiary” requires
Zoning changes and development neighborhood plans for these areas the need to incorporate even higher
shall be consistent with the future as part of future amendments to quality site and building design
land use category shown on the this Comprehensive Plan to further strategies to mitigate potential
map and the corresponding plan illustrate and guide development incompatibilities with adjacent uses
text. within these areas. The Village may when considering rezoning to these
also require that developers create districts.
neighborhood plans for these areas
prior to submitting requests for
rezonings or preliminary plats.
BEST PRACTICE DESIGN of this Comprehensive Plan. In regional flood line). The proposed
STRATEGIES some cases it may be years or development will not result in
The Best Practice Design Strategies decades before (re)development undue water, air, light, or noise
listed within each category, and envisioned in the plan occurs pollution. Petitioners may indicate
those found on pages 4-23 to 4-26, due to market conditions, those approaches they intend to use
are provided to help developers property owner intentions, and to preserve or enhance the most
and Village officials make design Village capacity to serve new (re) important and sensitive natural
decisions during the development development. features of the proposed site and
process consistent with the intent mitigate impacts to surrounding
of the future land use category and AMENDING THE FUTURE properties.
the general desire for high quality LAND USE MAP
site and building design. These Transportation - The lay of the
strategies may be used to help It may from time to time land will allow for construction of
determine whether to approve a be appropriate to consider appropriate roads and/or driveways
rezoning, conditional use permit, site amendments to the Future Land that are suitable for travel or access by
plan, or planned unit developments. Use Map, usually in response to a emergency vehicles. The proposed
The illustrations and photos are not type of development not originally amendment/development will not
an exhaustive list of best planning envisioned for an area when this create a significant detriment to the
practice and do not constitute the plan was adopted. See Chapter 5 for condition of adjacent transportation
whole means by which high quality a description of the procedural steps facilities or cause significant safety
site and building design can occur. for amending any aspect of this concerns for motorists, bicyclists,
plan. The following criteria should or pedestrians. Petitioners
The identification of future land be considered before amending the may indicate those approaches
use categories and associated map. they intend to use to mitigate
typical uses and potentially transpor tation compatibility
acceptable zoning districts Compatibility - The proposed concerns.
does not compel the Village amendment/development will
to approve development or not have a substantial adverse Ability to Provide Services
rezoning petitions consistent effect upon adjacent property or - Provision of public facilities
with the future land use the character of the area, with a and services will not place an
category or map. Other factors particular emphasis on existing unreasonable financial burden
will have to be considered, such residential neighborhoods. A on the Village. Petitioners may
as the quality of the proposed petitioner may indicate approaches demonstrate to the Village that
development, its potential that will minimize incompatibilities the current level of services in the
effect on adjacent properties, between uses. Village, or region, including but
its potential effect on Village not limited to school capacity,
transportation infrastructure, the Natural Resources - The land does emergency services capacity (police,
capacity and ability to provide not include natural features such as fire, EMS), parks and recreation,
services to the site, and the wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, library services, and potentially
phasing of development, before scenic vistas or mature woodlands water and/or sewer services, are
any development applications (1 or more acres, especially those adequate to serve the proposed use.
are approved. In addition, consisting of heritage trees), Petitioners may also demonstrate
it is not anticipated that all which will be adversely affected how they will assist the Village with
areas suggested for future (re) by the proposed amendment/ any shortcomings in public services
development on the Future development. Any proposed or facilities.
Land Use Map will develop or building envelopes are not located
be rezoned for development within the setback of Shoreland and
immediately following adoption Floodplain zones (or is raised above

to be midway between the main
Public Need - There is a clear public Land Use Map, the following rules tracks.
need for the proposed change or will apply. If uncertainty still exists,
5. Boundaries indicated as following
unanticipated circumstances have the Village Board shall decide any
shorelines and floodplains, will be
resulted in a need for the change. inquires related to map boundaries
construed to follow such shorelines
The proposed development is likely upon recommendation of the
and floodplains, and in the event
to have a positive social and fiscal Planning Commission.
of change in the shorelines and
impact on the Village. The Village
floodplains, it will be construed as
may require that the property owner, 1. B o u n d a r i e s i n d i c a t e d a s
moving the mapped boundary.
or their agent, fund the preparation approximately following the center
of a fiscal impact analysis by an lines of streets, highways, or alleys 6. Boundaries indicated as following
independent professional. will be construed to follow such the center lines of streams, rivers,
center lines. canals, or other bodies of water will
Adherence to Other Portions of this be construed to follow such center
2. B o u n d a r i e s i n d i c a t e d a s
Plan - The proposed amendment/ lines.
approximately following platted
development is consistent with the lot lines or U.S. Public Land Survey 7. Boundaries indicated as parallel
general vision for the Village, and lines will be construed as following to extension of features indicated
the other goals, objectives, and such lot lines. in the preceding above will be
strategies of this plan. so construed. The scale of the
3. B o u n d a r i e s i n d i c a t e d a s
map will determine distances not
I N T E R P R E T I N G approximately following municipal
specifically indicated on the map.
BOUNDARIES boundaries will be construed as
following such boundaries.
Where uncertainty exists as to 4. Boundaries indicated as following
the boundaries of future land use railroad lines will be construed
categories shown on the Future
N LYNNDALE DR
W SPRING ST
N CASALOMA DR
ENDE AVOUR DR
W EL
N WESTHILL BLVD
N HICKORY FARM LA
N FAIR ST
N MUTUAL WAY
AY
COMMUNICATION DR
W INTEGRITY W W COMMERCIAL ST E COMMERCIAL ST

N SUPERIOR ST
N PERKINS S T
B
N APPLETON ST
N
E
RG
W WINNEBAGO ST E WINNEBAGO ST
BA
T
N DIVISION ST
S
N MAYFLOWER DR
AV
E HANCOCK ST
N CLARK ST
E
DG TAG
N STATE ST
WH W RE E V W OKLAHOMA ST
O
E ATLANTIC ST
U
ERAM IE
IG
N MORRISON ST
W MICHAELS DR HV W ELSIE ST
Future Land Use

N DREW ST
N RICHMOND ST
E PACIFIC ST
N BLU MND DR
I
AV CT
NDOUGLAS ST
N LINW OOD AV
E W DR
W LORAIN ST
N DURKEE ST
W PACKARD ST
N LILAS DR
E NORTH ST
N W O O D S ED G E D R
N METRO
W HARRIS ST
DR
W GRAND E MA R K ET DR W FRANKLIN ST E FRANKLIN ST
City of
W WASH ST E WASH ST
"
!
#
COLLEGE AV SYLVANI W COLLEGE AV W COLLEGE AV E COLLEGE AV
S K O O LS
41
S VICTORIA ST
S LINWOOD AV
S SUMMIT ST
N
A
DR
PE N AV
Appleton
S DOUGLAS ST
OTE CH DR E ALTON ST
W
LAW RENCE ST W LAWRENCE ST

R
AE
G r e e n v i l l e S MAYFLOWER
S STORY ST
E JOHN ST
LONG CT T
MUNICIPAL DR
W EIGHTH S W EIGHTH ST
T
SPENCER RD W SPENCER ST
S LOCUST ST
S LYNNDALE DR
T
S PE
S WHITMAN AV
W SPENCER RD W SIXTH ST
S TIMMERS LA
L AGE C
ST
R
S MUELLER ST
S W ESTLAND DR
NCE R
W FOURTH ST
JULIUS DR
ß
XW OOD D
W FIFTH ST R
S PIERCE AV
S O LS ON AV
TE
CB TH ISLA ND
S NICOLET RD
VI
L
W TILLMAN ST
A
PILGRIM ST OU ST
E S
W SUNFLOWE R
S LILAS DR
Grand Chute
RD
S RIDGE LA
Comprehensive Plan
W SECOND ST
FO
W GRAND MEA DOW S DR

To w n o f
S MASON ST
To w n o f
E SOUTH RIVER ST
S PERKINS ST
W HASKEL ST E LINCOLN ST
W EVERETT ST
2018-2038
W ROGERS AV
k
E MC KINLEY ST
S CASALOMA DR
S MEMORIA L D R
S OUTAGAMIE ST
W PINE ST
ee
W PINE ST
S LEHMAN N LA
S ALICIA DR
S BARTELL DR
R
AY
E HARRISON ST
OWB
ZD
S VAN DYKE RD
Mud C r
W
S MADISON ST
S BLU MND DR
RO OK
ME AD
L
W W HI TE TAI E FREMONT ST
DR
UT
S JACKSON ST
PINE
MEADOW S LA
S LAWE ST
SL
R
SUNSET DR
CT
ARLES S T
TWO MILE RD
CH
E
CT
RIV
W SEYMOUR ST
WAY
W
PROSPECT CT
W RE
RAMLEN
RID G E S ID E D R
ID DR
ER ST
CT
AY CT
Outagamie County
RK
ST
FAI
W VERBRICK ST
RY FO
G BA
ß
RW
KO ARDEN
BB
HIC
W
CT
G
SH A W PROSPECT AV W PROSP ECT E CALUMET ST

WINNEGAMIE DR AVE
Winneb ago County
T
R UN
r GROVE ST W CA L UME T S E COOLIDGE AV
ve
X
ANTO
GMEINER RD
CARLETON AVE
LOIS LN
Ri
O E MURRAY AV
CT
DR
F
GR E
BARBARA AVE
CT
UN CT E HARDING DR
S HARMON ST
THERESA AVE
ox
NORTHERN RD
BRA
N GOR
S EAST ST
LIND LN
SADES WILSON AVE E WILSON AV

ALI N CIR
F
DR
W IN CT
E TAFT AV
P
ANTO
LERIE
S ONEIDA ST
LARKSPUR DR ST
R
RACINE RD (COUNTY RD P) BECK ST
E HOOVER AV
CHAIN DR
D
VA
ND WINWOOD DR BALD
LA
IS
STRO E VALLEY RD E ROELAND AV
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P)
REDTAIL DR
MEADOW GR EEN DR
EB
EB
GREGORY LN
W SC
RO
CT
DR
E
ST
R E SYLVAN AV
NO RTHRIDG E
O OD DR HINDLER P L
HIGH MEA DOWS LN
GOLF W
D
Future Land Use

HOL L RD

DR
DEER PRAIRIE DR
E LAYTON AV
ALCA N
E
MITC
%
¾ 441
HEL L
D
LN AV
GAIL LN
.
/
MIM O S A
HR
Y
FAIR OAK S DR
%
¾ 441
E
10
IS
M EM
UNIVERSITY DR
DR
AC
Rural Lands & Urban Reserve

JAMES ST
UN
OR
IE LD
AC O
S
S BE
DR
W IN DF
Y LN
Planning Area
L
SIL A
E
TRAILSWAY LN
A M ERICAN DR
E MEA D OW GROVE B LV
ID
LN RN
WA
S
D
CT
MORT
K
C RE E
Low Density Residential

B u tt L a k e

R
LYNN DR
DUNNING ST
LN
MISSION ST
EARL ST
ED
MIDW
M o rt e s
HOME AVE
W SHADY LN E SHA DY LN E DR AY R
K RD
TU
N OX L N
CIRCL
S
County Line
SHOR
76
%
¾ MBLEB
D
E DE
LAKEVIEW
SUNSET LN
OLD
Medium Density Residential

NENNIG RD R OO
e D
DR
s
ST
LBR O DR WITTMANN DR
E BUGGY DR
OK
BUTT
KE
IL
K M
TE
SANDY'S LN
L it tl e
W DR
IRISH RD
FATIMA
LA
High Density Residential

LUCERNE DR
IELD
AY M E
STEAD DR
M ILL PON
RD
ADO
City of Appleton
MAYER ST
W
MEADOWVIEW DR
GATE
TR
D LN
PROVINCE
LN
IN
W S LN
S O UTHF
O
H AR M ON R D
ON
B A RTLE IN CT
RD
FIELDVIE
AK H
DUB L
O L LO
GENEVA RD NK
GR ND L E T
Neighborhood Mixed Use

ST ST
AIRPORT RD A
PL
HAROLD DR
City of Menasha
W EST AME RICA
DR
N
OV ON
STERLING HEIGHTS DR
LO PP
ST
GOSS AVE
W EST AMERICAN DR DR FORKIN ST

D
R
HIGHLAND PARK R CL JENNIE ST

A
FI FT E EN T H ST
TO N D
O VE
AN
E
Commercial
A
R
ST
City of Neenah
ALV
HIL
DL
/
.
L IN G
CLAUDE ST
W T
OO
10
T W ELFTH S T EUGENE ST
S
Industrial
MELISSA
ELRU DR
Village of Harrison
ELEVENTH ST
CLAYTON AVE
PRA IR I
W IND
DR
ST
RD
MCMAHO TENTH ST STARDUST D R OC
N DR
OW
AR
"
!
CIR
#
NIT
Government, Institutional & Utilities
M NINTH ST
IDA
EMILY ST
MA
ARTHUR ST
JOHN ST
E LA K E
41
JEFFERSON ST
COLD SPRING RD
MILWAUKEE ST
FAIRVIEW RD JACOBSEN RD
Town Line
LISB O N AVE
/
.
MANITOWOC ST
STATE ST
SUSAN AVE
LORI DR
EIGHTH ST
114 Parks, Recreation & Conservancy
DE PERE ST
Village
ER L
MARY LN
N
ST
CARV
TAYCO ST
APPLETON ST
BRIGHTON
D
O NEIDA
Waterbody
SEVENTH ST
KR
Right-of-Way
of Harrison
O'LEARY RD
AN
ß
MARQUETTE ST PL
OAKWOOD AVE
CB ESON ST
City of
AM
ST
SIXTH ST H RD
J
BE AC
Perennial Stream/River
KE
FIFTH ST
Natural Resource Protection
LAKE ST
RACINE ST
Menasha
N LA
FOUR TH ST
RD
AL
KIMBERLY DR
RD
BRIGHT
Ca lu m et Cou nty
H
NG
A
ON
AS
BE
THIRD ST
Proposed Mixed-Use
RS
CONS TITUTION DR ES CT
K UE H N CT
Bicycle Facility Type

N E FF
T SECOND ST DR
US
DR
LE
ICE ST
RG
Village Center
OAKVIEW DR FIRST ST
KA
EH
DR
DEERW
WINNCREST RD
BROAD ST
OOD A
T
KA
Bike Lane
ES
KLUCK ST
R UK CHUTE ST Menasha Channel
FIELDC
ßII
A UN
VE
WIN CHESTER RD RI A
COOKE RD VE S ERW
S FIELDCREST DR
R ST
DEERWOOD DR
T
SPRING ROAD DR
RIV
AY
A rr Off Road Unpaved
WINNEBAGO AVE
D
N GREEN BAY RD
ow KEYES ST
R
ß
ST
LAWSON ST
BLAIR AVE
h
KE
WILLOW LN
ELM ST
PARK ST
O
9TH ST NAYMUT ST
LOPAS ST
GTO N
LA
ea
Off Road Paved

OAK ST
d R
A S HIN
AY DR
R
K D
RIDGEW
i v er
OO
PLUMMER AVE
W
FAIRBR
GRUENWALD AVE
NICOLET BLVD
Planned Bike/Ped Facility
8TH ST
LIEU RD
12TH ST
2ND ST
NORTH ST HIGH ST
T
C IA ST
76
%
¾
1ST ST
ANDREW AVE D EN H A R D T AVE
HEWITT ST
LS
W ES TFIE LD RIDGE
D
DEKALB LN
City
GREEN ST
U
ER N
A
BE
3RD ST
MM BO
5TH ST
P E FOREST AVE
TTER CU
4TH ST
RD
BU
of Neenah
MA
RICHAR D AVE
CLAIRE AVE
S JOHN ST
GOLF
IN
CO
DR
ST
S GREEN BAY RD
S LAKE ST
LINCOLN ST
G ER
FONDOTTO DR C OU
N
To w n o f
Clayton
T
L LEN
RSE DR
RD
HS
S W ESTERN AVE
ID GE E Lake
RC
C LARK
CHA
W ST
ISABELLA ST
KR
HARRISON ST
S CHU
LARSEN RD OA E IS
COLEM A N RIDGE
UNION ST
ROCK LEDGE LN CO
E
TRIB UT E
CO
Winnebago
AV
LU E D NS IN
E O
ADAMS S T FR M B IA TY AV
RE
WA A N N A AV E
E
AV
SH K LIN V E E
HO
TULLAR RD
K
DR
IN
AR
GT AV E
ug
ES
ENNON
S COMMERCIAL ST
Data Sources:
NP

ROS ON
CHESTNUT ST
L
K
lo
E M
HIGGINS AVE
NE AVE AV
LN
LA

LORRAI
hS
E
O
O N W AY
Winnebago County, WI
HENRY ST

JA
S PARK AVE
CEDAR ST
DR CKSON ST
ena
D
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and
DR M C K IN LE Y S T
VE
CONGRESS ST
HARVAR
H
ZEMLOCK AVE
UT E A
STEVENS ST
F
RADCLI F
DARTMO
NN
Outagamie Counties.
REDDIN AVE
CO
Ne
O TTA DR
NE
RD
BETTY AVE
W IN
REED ST
RD
BALDWIN ST
W Bicycle Facilities: Village of Fox Crossing

ELM ST
MAPLE ST
CT
DR
OAK ST
E
GAIL AV E
Bike/Ped Plan.
W NE
G
HUNT AVE
GROVE ST
TO
RID
JOSEPH MILKWEE D W ES LENNOX ST

P ETE C
STATE ST Future Land Use: Fox Crossing (04-19-
AK
TERRA
LN
RS DR
KING ST
2018).
IAL
ß
BA
W CECIL ST E CECIL ST
SUND
JJ
GILL
YV
QUARRY LN
PENDLETON RD
FAIRWOOD DR CURTIS AVE

EVANS ST
G W OOD T R
JEWELERS PARK DR
IE W
HAYLETT ST
MELROS E S
R
0 0.35 0.7 Miles

ING
D LANGLEY BLVD
N CT
OO KESSLER DR
M V ILLAGE DR O WRIGHT AVE
HAM RD
DR
T
PA R K
OXFORD
R
N
CA M E
ES
DELL CT
RD
LN
HA
RV
GAY DR AM CT
CIR
L IM E K I
TH
CHA
BRIAR DR
DO
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_FutureLandUse_NoParcelLines.mxd Print Date: 6/11/2018
PLANNING DISTRICTS 4-10). Other than the difference in layout design the
location of future land uses on the District Maps are
This plan includes one Village-wide Future Land Use identical to the Village-wide Map.
Map along with several “Planning District Maps”. District
Maps are scaled to enable more detailed illustrations of
the locations throughout the Village where residential,
mixed-use, commercial, industrial, public, open and park
spaces should be located (refer to pages 4-6 through

k
S LILAS DR
E O
W H ASKE L ST
R ANGE ST
W ROGERS AV
S MA SON ST
W E VERE TT S T E MC KINLEY ST
W R IVE R RD
W P INE ST
S LE HMA NN LA
E HARRISON ST
S OUTAGAM IE ST
W P INE ST
S B ARTE LL D R
R
Improve drainage issues
ZD
S ALICIA DR
Xavier HS E FREMO NT ST
k Potential Neighborhood Park Site "A"
T
LU
Move volleyball court poles & replace curbing
S MA DIS ON S T
S ONEIDA S T
S
Upgrade trail from community center to rest of park Work with City of Appleton to add
DR
S
RE
S DOUGLAS ST
R
S BLU MND DR
T CT
HYC
park to northeast area of Village
S CONNE LL S T
E
IV
W CED AR S T
R
S MAYFAIR DR
AV
RAMLEN CT
T
S KASPER DR
W REID D R
EC S TER ST
CT
P FO
OS
S
C
RT
HERRY
PR
MO
W W V ERBRICK S T k
S
BUTTE D E
Foster ES
CT
ARDE N
CT
G
E CALUME T ST
Construct native prairie area
MAPLECREST DR
DR ST
GARDNERS ROW
ET
SUMA C L N
ES GROVE ST W CAL UM
Increase soccer play areas LIS
AD
PA
Add landscaping to parking lot and shelter
IMPERIAL LN
E HARDING DR
AVE
GR
CT
R
LD
GMEINER RD
CARLETON AVE
CT
VIE
W E GO R
R IA WILS ON AV E
SOUTHWOO D DR
ER
MO
BARBA RA
HICKORY LN
RIV
ME
S
TEAKWOOD ST
AVE
PALISADE S LN
VALE R I
WA
OME GA DR
FORESTVIEW CT
E S DR
Palisades E HOOVER AV
THERE SA
AD
LA RKSPUR DR
R
LIS
Park
CHAIN DR
DR
NO
PA E DR
Annex Lane
W
ON
ND WIN WOOD DR
LA
O'C
IS
BE CK S T
S W HE ATFIE LD D R
E VALLE Y RD (COUNTY RD P) VALLE Y RD
S ASTORLN
EB
GA RNET CT
EMERALD CT
Pearl-Stroebe-Cox
NOVAK DR
O
BUD DR
R
RD
ST
PEA RL ST
S Open Space
W
HIGHRIDGE
TR
A P PLE TON
S CHINDLE R PL
CT
OE
R
D
ALCA N
BE
IDGE
/
. %
¾ %
¾
RD
10 441 441
TE R R
HR
LN
DR
NO RT
N
RP S DR
E
CO
AW
IS
NR
ST
DRUM
OD L
ACO R N
KRIDGE CT
UW-Fox Valley
SU
OA
k
MIDWA Y
WO
MALOA
MIDW AY
RD Maplewood MS
k
O RE DR
(CO CT
S ONEIDA S T
U NT
PL
YR
DA MIDW AY RD (COUNTY RD A P )
OLDE MID WAY RD P)
KEN WOO D DR
PA RKS ID E DR
ESH
DUNNING S T
UNIV E R
LA K
AVE
GRE EN ST
LILLY ST
N
W L
CIRCLE
MISS ION ST
CHATEAU TERR
LINDA
ONE IDA S T (US HW Y 10)

LA KE V IE
S IT
ST
Y DR
WITTMANN DR DR
SUNSET LN
FATIMA
TWELVE OAKS
L
SANDY'S LN
HOME AVE
LUCE RN E DR
APP LE CT
W AY
B ARTLE IN C T
EARL ST
S
RACINE RD (COUN TY RD P)
CE
Wittmann Park Fritsch

AN
P RO VINCE TE R
FR
Butte des NCE

S ST Park
STE AD DR
FRA
Morts Park
.
/
10
Gegan ES AIRPORT RD
GE NEVA RD
CT
ADOW LN
MEA DOWVIEW DR
DE PE RE ST
GOSS AVE
MAY ER S T
STER L ING HE IGHTS DR

RD
BONNIE DR
RA
ST
%
¾ 441
HARO LD DR
DE B
ST
DR
FIELDCRES T DR
ON
VE
JE NNIE ST
ST
DR
ME
ND
O
ET
POMER WAY
TAYC O RD
D
DO
CL
GR
OO
DEERFIELD AVE
OV
LA
PL
VA
N
NW
ER
AL
D
AP
W IL
LO
ST
EE
OO
L IA CL
GR
M OV
W
KAR EN DR
ST IS VIS
CLA UDE ST
AV GR EUGENE ST
E O
ST
T W ELFTH ST
G R E NDALE ST
E
PARADIS E LN
ST
HAPPY VALLEY DR
Clovis
ELRU D R
MARI NATURE S WAY

ELEVENTH ST
MANITOWOC ST
Grove ES
ID A
ASY ST
k STA RDUST DR D
E
LN
TENTH ST CR
O WO
ST
NINTH ST NINTH ST N IT
MA
MARTIN S T
PACIFIC ST
EMILY S T
MELISS A
JE FFERSON ST
ARTHUR ST
JOHN S T
Plant a prairie area

Continue with
EIGH TH ST
.
/
114
WARS AW S T
Add plantings by exercise area TRA DE RS RD D

ST
KR
shoreline restoration Menasha HS PL
AN
k Add permanent pathway by exercise area
O NEIDA
Add swing set SEVE NTH ST

Add security cameras
SEVE NTH ST FIRELANE 1 RD
SCHOOL CT
APPLETON S T
Replace benches
DE PERE S T
MILWA UKEE ST
RD
LONDON ST
ROOSE VELT ST CH
FREDERICK ST
B EA
TAYC O S T
RD N
N AR D HTO
RE Y
B RIG
BA
SIXTH S T
E
RU
LD
RACINE ST
WIN
FIFTH ST
East
ST
LA KE ST
ST
KO
AN
NEMA C ST
FO U R TH S T SHE BO Y G
B RIGHTO N DR
*Refer to Fox Crossing Bike Plan and CORP for
more details on recommended improvements
MANITOWOC ST
St. Mary ES THIRD ST

GREEN BAY ST
Menasha k
Future Land Trinity
UseLuthern High Density Residential Government, Institutional & Utilities Bike Lane
SECOND ST US DR
Library G
ICE ST
KAR
Menasha
LOCK ST
Grade School FIRST S T
Rural Lands &k Urban Reserve Neighborhood Mixed Use Parks, Recreation & Conservancy Off Road Unpaved
Police
LUS H S T
BROAD ST
KA
Low
A U Density Residential Commercial Right-of-Way Off Road Paved
W UK PA R
AT CHUTE S T IS S T
E R
ST NA
ST
MA
PL
Medium Density Residential Industrial Natural Resource Protection Planned Bike/Ped Facility
ST N NA
RI
I
MA ERW A
RD
RIV
ST
Y
ST
RI V E R S
H
ER
HIG
T E
CE
NT AK
L
SK
S MAPLE HILL DR
OOLS ST
S W E IGH TH ST
S MISTY LA
LONG CT W EIGH TH
S LONG CT
Badger ES
W S PENCE R ST
k
SP
L A GE C T
KOOLS CT
SPE NCE R RD
ENCE R
S WILD ROS E LA
S GOLDENROD DR
W FOURTH ST
W FOURTH ST
CAPE COD AV
VI L
S RIDGE LA
S TIMMERS LA
W TILLMAN ST
S WESTLAND DR
W C EDAR CRES T CT
S LYNND ALE DR
S MAY FLOWER DR
S LILAS DR
W SERENITY C
W S ECOND ST
S NICOLET RD
W GRAN D ME AD OW S DR W JUSTIN ST
S CA SA LOMA DR
W NATUR E S LA
S BLU MND DR
S VIOLET LA
W
CH
ICO
!
"
#
41
W E VERE TT S T
S PERK INS ST
WA R
Y LA
ST
ER
L W P INE ST W LE ONA RD ST
CT
D OWB R
Revise master plan for park M EA O OK LA
R OO K
CONS OLIDATE
DC
T WA Potential Neighborhood Park Site "B" B C HA RLES S T
TE
S ME A DO W W
R
TO
S VAN DY KE RD
NE
CT
CT
S
PROSPEC T CT
TE CHNO L
RT
DR DR
MO
OGY
E
ON EE
S
BUTTE D E
ST RO
K
ER W CH E
W EA H
S BEHM CT
T
CIR
BB
ß W PROS PECT A V W P ROS P E CT AV
E
BELAIRE RD
BODOH WAY
N
KISS ER CT
RU
OX
F
CT
N O RTH ERN RD
W
VIE
ER
IV
E S DR
R
AD
S
EGA DR
PA LI
OM
LA RKSPUR DR
DR
VAL BECK S T
ND Annex Lane WIN WOOD DR
HOLLY RD
LA
IS
WATERMA RK CT
STRO BE Y RD (COUNTY RD
P)
B E Pearl-Stroebe-Cox
E E LE
MEA DOW GRE EN DR
RO
CB
ß
RD
Open SSpace
ST
GRE GORY LN
COLD SP RIN G RD
Y
RR GA
HA TE W
AY
CT
RACINE RD (COUN TY RD P)
IA NW O OD C T
IND
REDTA IL DR
A M ER I
LACEWI NGDR
ALLISON DR
GE
THRUSH LN
H IGH M EA D OW S LN
COUNTRY LN
LN
DEER PRA IR IE DR
NO R TH RID
DR
C AN DR
N
W P RAIR
G A IL LN
E PR A IR IE
E
W
IS
ODLA
NR
U
S
IE C E K DR
Woodland
WO
FOX CITIES DR
CR
RE
E EK
OR E DR
Prairie TRAILS WAY LN
DR
Park
D
CH R
OLDE MID WAY RD
ESH
DUNNING S T
LYN N DR
EA
LA K
LILLY ST
C T
W L
TS B
441
E SHADY LN
TU
LA KE V IE
%
¾
CA
M
M OR
T WOO DGATE L N BLEBR

DC
RI
AR O
E
OK R D
CH
OR NENNIG R D OOK AM
BR
ES
LN DR
SUNSET LN
EE LL
TR MI
TE D
E
WHIP P L
W E ATHE RWO OD DR
EA
DR
BU T
GL WAY
OD
E
OLDE B UGGY DR
S
OXW O
CE
Butte des A N CE S ST 10
DR
/
.
AN
GAS R D
Schildt
FR
LN
L POND
IL
M FR
Park CO P P E RHE AD
DR Morts
GOLF B
Park AIRPORT RD
AG NES AV E
k
"
!
#
BRYCE DR
RI Gegan ES
41
DG
DR
Prepare conceptual site

E
DR
STO PHE R FIFTEENTH ST
DRESANG W AY
I
HIGHLAND PA RK RD
master plan for the south
HR
C
W ES T AME RICA N D R
portion of the park to include: KAR EN DR
parking lot, trail to Benjamin Ct., TW E LFTH S T
10
.
/ 441
%
¾ lighted volleyball, upgrade 1/2 basketball
HAPPY VALLEY DR
WESTFIELD LN
Huber court, soccer goal backstops, ELEVENTH ST
Open
WINDMAR DR
TENTH ST
MCMAHON DR
Space
pervious pavement, swing benches,
WES TCREE K LN
NINTH ST
CB
creek bed restoration,
ß Westfield
Park TOWMEN RD replace shelter roof, shade trees
JA COBSEN RD
St. Mary MS and prairie areas, ADA improvements
k
STATE S T
WARS AW S T
DE PERE S T
Wildlife Gant Park CA RV

Menasha HS
ER
Heights Open k
LN
TAYC O S T
North Central
Space
APPLETON S T
SEVE NTH ST
SCHO OL CT
T
WALBRUN ST
ES
MILWA UKEE ST
AK
*Refer toSTFox Crossing Bike Plan and CORP for

TIMBER RU
NL
FREDERICK
AM
E SON ST more details on recommended SIXTH improvements
ST
J
DR
Future Land Use High Density Residential Government, Institutional & Utilities Bike Lane
FIFTH ST
RACINE ST
LA KE ST
W HEELER RD Fritse FOU R TH S T
Park
Rural Lands & Urban Reserve Neighborhood Mixed Use Parks, Recreation & Conservancy Off Road Unpaved
R
D
AN OT
IC H TO
ER AA
D
KIMB ERLY DR ST
Commercial Right-of-Way Off Road Paved

R
AM
LN
Low Density Residential E DR

SE BU THIRD ST St. Mary ES
E
k
L
TT
D
INDEPEN S
RE
ES Menasha
AI
T T
RD
DEN
C T C
LA U
EL
NG
N E FF Library SECOND ST
AD
CONS TITUTION DR R
RS
IndustrialLOUISEKippenhan Natural Resource Protection Grade SchoolPlanned

FIRST SBike/Ped Facility
Trinity Luthern
KU EHN CT
Medium Density
Roy Residential
E
EN
LOCK ST
T Menasha
LE
BA
RD
Police
k
LUSH ST
EH
YR
Kuehn Park Park

D
BROAD ST

C ONSOLIDATE
DC
T
Potential Community Park Site "D" - Re-purpose landfill.

Possible amenities:
ECHNOLOGY
Potential Community Park Site "C" sledding, cross country, skiing, mountain bike, trails,
CIR
golf course, playfields, trails
Future Trail Corridor adjacent

to intermittent stream to connect
ß
W PROS P ECT AV
to adjacent planned parks and trails BB
Expand park site through land dedication

or fees in lieu of dedication to
create a community park.
Develop master plan for park.
Possible amenities:
play structures ß
CB
ball diamond Woodland
basketball courts Prairie
picnic areas Park
trails M IM
LN
OSA
shelter
soccer fields
W IN
lighting DF
L OWE
R
parking
DR
Anunson DR W
AS
E
Farm I L LA
ID
LN
S
Park
K
E
CR E
TIM
BER RID GE RD
E SHADY LN
FOX
IRIS H R D
B URROW CT
CLAYTON AVE
WHIPPLETREE LN
M ARTINGALE LN
FOREST GL E
E W AY
GAT PL JU LIE CT
M
ERSTONE
DEE R
EAD
NR
TR PP
D
CREE K RD LIN
PATH CIR
EN CO
OW S
UB
DD Gateway D
SPR ING HIL
I
SM OK E H
TR Subdivision
LN
BRYCE DR
EE
Open Space
L CT
RD
GATEWA
Y PL
R
W ES T AME RIC A N D DRESANG W AY
MEADOW HEIGHTS Proposed

Meadow
CI
Add benches Mixed Use

R
W ES Heights Park Village Center

TA
ME and shade trees
ß
RIC
AN D
R
S P RING MEADOW D
R CB
/
.
10
TCRE E
ES
P RA IRIE LA KE CIR
Add Walking Trails around wetland
Northwest
to adjacent neighborhoods
LN
WESTCREEK LN

Future Land FAUse

IRVIE W RD High Density Residential Government, Institutional
JA COBSEN RD
& Utilities Bike Lane
Rural Lands & Urban Reserve Neighborhood Mixed Use Parks, Recreation SUSAN
& Conservancy Off Road Unpaved
CT
SY MP H O NY B LV D
AV E
GAVIN RD
LORI DR
AVA
Commercial Right-of-Way MARY LN Off Road Paved

LE E ST
Low Density Residential Wildlife

LN
E LY NN
Heights Open
Medium Density Residential Industrial Natural Resource Protection
O'Houser Planned
IL C Bike/Ped Facility
Space
KERWIN RD
MCGANN RD
D
MA RA
Park T
T
E LK
MILL POND LN
JUL IE CT BENJAMIN CT
AM E RICA N DR
COPPERSTONE
Schildt
CO P P E
OLDE B UGGY DR
MIL
PL
Park R HEA D DR
LP
CT
ON
LN
D
K A UFMA N S T
W
H RD
OA
LO
K HO
BRYCE DR
R
CI
B LA CK M O O R
EAC
ETH AN WAY
TS B
DR
DR
Shoreline restoration
ISTOP HER
M OR
DRESANG W AY
LT A
HIGHLAND PA RK RD Clear brush, weeds, invasive species
ES
CH
DE
Add bike rack
TE D
Add benches
W
ES
BU T
Add wayfinding signage to park T AME Add picnic area
R ICA N DR
Add boardwalks and trails
10
/
. 441
%
¾
ESTCRE E WESTFIELD LN Huber
W
Open
LN MCMAHON DR FI
Space
COLD SP RIN G RD
WESTCREEK LN
CT ELDSTONE
Westfield
Park
TOW MEN RD
JA COBSEN RD
St. Mary MS
k
41
"
!
#
SY M P HON Y BLVD
Gant
Park
Wildlife
Heights Open
JA
C
Space
IL C
OB
TRA
SE
K
EL
T
N
RD
DR
K
TR
A IL
Add year-round facility
EL
CB
or gazebo
TIMBE R RU
ß JA ME SON ST
Prairie restoration
DR
EHLERS RD Shoreline restoration
N
Fritse
R
Invasive removal
D
Park
AN
W HE ELER RD
IC
R
E
AM
OT
T OS
D
KIMB ERLY DR T
L R
D
D ECLARATION D R
A
BU
N
TT
NG
INDEP E N
EL L
DE ES
AI
NC T T
C
BE
EL
E DR F
R
AD
HA EF
LA U
CONS TITUTION DR AS
T
ES N
T ES Upgrade cameras along trail,
AK
K UE H N C T
LOUISE RD
NL
Kippenhan Park Add additional parking for

OA KVIEW DR
Roy
DEE RWOOD SCHANKE ST Kuehn boat trailers,
Park Add ADA canoe/kayak launch
AV E
AV
K LUCK ST
ZEH AVE
AVE
E
MARGE O Strohmeyer
DR
WANDA
BURNETTE S T
VERA
Park
WIN CHESTER RD
ßII
BO
Spring
COOKE RD
NDOW DR
Road ES
k
SPRING ROAD DR
N
DL
RIDGE WAY DR T
BLAIR AVE
PLEASA NT CT
XS
OO
FO
RW
SHREVE LN
VE
41
"
!
#
SIL
VIOLA ST
CH AP MA N AV E
N GREE N BAY RD
Update play equipment GLENV IEW DR

Improve site drainage Update play equipment
CRESTVIEW AV E
Add benches
O
RD
ß
R
RIDGEW AY
KD
OO
FA IRB R
EDNA AVE
GRUE NWA LD AVE
NORTH ST
PLUMMER AVE
WN
OR
TH
N W E STERN AV E
South Central
W
DENHARDT AVE
AT
ST
ER

N JOHN ST

MAIN ST
O D LN
ROC KW O
MA
IN
S GRE EN B AY RD
CLA IRE AVE
Neighborhood Mixed Use Parks, Recreation & Conservancy ST Off Road Unpaved
ANDREW AV E
RICH ARD AVE
Rural Lands & Urban Reserve

S JOHN S T
D R
S W ES TE RN AV E
W
E W
DG HELEN ST
M ILLV I E W
IS C
I
ON
KR Commercial Right-of-Way Off Road Paved

S
Low Density Residential

IN
AV
OA k E
W
ST
DO
S LA KE ST
DR
R
Fox Valley
TY
ST
Taft ES
E
ST
MAY
Industrialk Natural Resource Protection Planned Bike/Ped Facility AV

Medium Density Residential
Christian Academy
BRIE
GE IGE R S T E
N
N
TULLAR RD
VA
RISO
N ST
JE AN ST SMITH ST
UNION ST
k St. Gabriel ES
HA R

EERPATH CIR HILL D R RD
LOW K
TR
D
E
RE
G ATE
SMOKE TRE E R D C OA K H
IL
EN
Gateway OL
W AY
HIDD LO
IN
W LN
BL
ME ADO
BRYCE DR
Subdivision
DU
Open Space
WS
ETHA N WAY
LN
W E ST A ME RICAN DR
GATEW A
Y PL
Resurface parking lot
Potential Neighborhood
Potential Neighborhood Park Site "G" Expand walking
Park Site "G" Extension of
Extension of O'Hauser Park Meadow trails w/ boardwalks
Wildlife Heights Open Space
with trail connections Heights SHA NGRA LA LN
Park
S P R ING ME A DO W D HI
R LL
I N GTON D
R
R
W ES T AME RICA N D
10
/
.
ES TCRE EK
W
LN
PRAIRIE LAKE C IR
WESTCREEK LN
JA COBSEN RD
FAIRVIEW RD
GE R
S HW IN LN
D
S YMP HONY B LV
SUSAN AV E
CT
LORI DR
AVA
Wildlife
MARY LN LE E ST Heights
LN
Open Space
L Y NN
IRIS H R D
MA D MCGANN RD CT
IL
TRA
E
K
EL
KERWIN RD
O'LEARY RD DR
A IL
TR
K
EL
CLAYTO N AVE
CB
ß
O'Houser Park
B ROOK FIE LD KIMB ERLY DR

DR
BROOKFIELD LN
LN
RE L
FIELDCR ES T DR
LA U
CONS TITUTION DR
WOODFIELD RD
OA KVIEW DR
DE ERW OOD AV E
MARGE O DR
WANDA AVE
BEVERLY CT
Strohmeyer
Park
ßII COOKE RD
ßII
AUGUSTINE R
D
RIDGE WAY DR
Southwest
Add benches
S FIELDCRES T DR
Add shade trees or shade canopy

*Refer to Fox Crossing Bike Plan and CORP for LN
SHREVE
O more details on recommended

ST
ß R O HME Y ER improvements
DR
DEERWO OD DR
SILV ERWOOD LN
Rural Lands & Urban Reserve Neighborhood Mixed Use Parks, Recreation & Conservancy Off Road Unpaved GLENV IEW DR
Low Density Residential Commercial Right-of-Way Off Road Paved

LN
OO D
W
Medium Density Residential Industrial Natural Resource Protection Planned Bike/Ped Facility
N
LI
FU T URE LAN D USE CATE GORIE S
RURAL LANDS & URBAN Density Residential land uses. The expansion of the Village should be
RESERVE preferred development density prohibited.
for non-agricultural residences is
STATEMENT OF INTENT & one (1) dwelling unit per twenty POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
TYPICAL USES (20) acres, or less, of contiguous ZONING DISTRICTS:
land under single ownership
The Rural Lands & Urban Reserve rounded to the nearest whole • A-2 General Agriculture (primary)
(RLUR) category is intended to number. In limited cases, the use of • R-1 Rural Residential (secondary)
preserve land and rural character in conservation subdivisions or cluster • R-2 Low Density Residential
areas deemed unlikely, inappropriate, developments may be permissible (tertiary)
or infeasible for non-agriculturally with potential group sewage disposal
based development at the time this systems. The development of non-
plan was developed. Typical uses agriculturally based commercial and
in these areas include, but are not manufacturing uses is also strongly
limited to: discouraged in RLUR areas until
such time as the Comprehensive
• Farming & farmsteads Plan is amended to identify these
• Agricultural based business (e.g. areas for Neighborhood Mixed Use,
farm implement sales) Commercial or Industrial land uses.
• Bed and breakfast
• Veterinary clinic, animal shelter/ Development in RLUR areas should
kennel be limited in order to preserve rural
• Nurseries, greenhouses, & vistas, open spaces, woodlands,
landscaping businesses and agricultural lands. In addition,
• Forestry operations limiting development in these areas
• Non-metallic quarry serves to reduce urban sprawl and
• Open spaces, prairies and inefficient land development. Non-
woodlands agriculturally based uses should be
• Hunting preserves and shooting targeted for development adjacent
ranges to existing developed lands within
• Limited residential non-farm the Village where a full range of
developments (i.e. excluding urban services can be provided and
subdivisions and public water and developments can occur at greater
sanitary utilities) densities.
• Government and Utility Facilities
(e.g. civic use facility, substations, Those new developments and
etc.) land divisions which are deemed
• Parks, trails, and recreational appropriate for approval in RLUR
facilities (e.g. golf course, areas should be located and designed
campgrounds, etc.) in order to accommodate integration
into future Village neighborhoods.
The development of residential New access points onto county and
subdivisions is strongly discouraged state highways should be avoided
in areas designated as RLUR until when possible, particularly those
such time as the Comprehensive intended to serve only one property.
Plan is amended to identify these New developments that would pose
areas for Low, Medium or High a threat to the efficient and logical

LOW DENSITY • Parks, trails and recreational
RESIDENTIAL facilities
• Municipal and utility facilities
STATEMENT OF INTENT & (e.g. well house, lift stations,
TYPICAL USES substation, etc.)
Low Density Residential (LDR) areas POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE

are intended for primarily single- ZONING DISTRICTS:
family housing with densities up to
4 units per acre. Areas classified as • R-1 Rural Residential (primary)
LDR will typically be predominately • R-2 Low Density Residential
single-family detached units with (primary)
the potential for some duplex • R-3 Medium Density Residential
developments. Though single- (secondary)
family housing is the predominant • A-2 General Agriculture (tertiary)
use in most neighborhoods, healthy, • B-1 Neighborhood Business
balanced neighborhoods may also (tertiary)
include other uses that support the • PDD Planned Development
needs of residents, including but not District (tertiary)
limited to:
BEST PRACTICE DESIGN STRATEGIES
• Community centers
• Places of worship
• Schools
• Day care centers
• Small pockets of Medium
Density Residential uses, less
than 10% of total unplatted
new development areas,
typically located as a buffer to
non-residential uses or along
major roadways/intersection
to a single-family housing
subdivision. The density within Placing the property at the corner of the parcel (property)
these areas shall be as prescribed maximizes productive agricultural land.
within the MDR future land use
category.
• Small commercial uses that
serve neighborhood needs,
less than 5% of total unplatted
new development areas,
typically located as a buffer to
non-residential uses or along
major roadways/intersections
to a single-family housing
subdivision. Conservation development layout example: Emphasis on
minimal roadways with a large amount of conserved land for
public use and trails.
MEDIUM DENSITY development areas, typically
RESIDENTIAL located as a buffer to non-
residential uses or along
STATEMENT OF INTENT & major roadways/intersection
TYPICAL USES to a single-family housing
subdivision. The density within
Medium Density Residential (MDR) these areas shall be as prescribed
areas are intended for primarily within the HDR future land use
single-family housing with densities category.
of 4 to 9 units per acre. Areas • Small commercial uses that
classified as MDR will typically serve neighborhood needs, less
be predominately single-family than 10% of total unplatted
detached units with the potential for new development areas,
some duplex, four-plex, and other typically located as a buffer to
lower density attached housing non-residential uses or along
developments such as courtyard major roadways/intersections
apartments, bungalow courts, and to a single-family housing
townhouses. Though single-family subdivision.
housing is the predominant use • Parks, trails and recreational
in most neighborhoods, healthy, facilities
balanced neighborhoods may also • Municipal and utility facilities
include other uses that support the (e.g. well house, lift stations,
needs of residents, including but not substation, etc.)
limited to:
POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
• Community centers ZONING DISTRICTS:
• Schools • R-3 Medium Density Residential
• Day care centers (primary)
• Small pockets of Low Density • R-2 Low Density Residential
Residential uses, less than (secondary)
20% of total unplatted new • R-4 High Density Residential
development areas, typically (secondary)
located adjacent to existing • PDD Planned Development
developed or planned Low District (secondary)
Density Residential areas. The • B-1 Neighborhood Business
density within these areas shall (tertiary)
be as prescribed within the LDR • M-1 Mixed-Use (tertiary)
future land use category.
• Small pockets of High Density
Residential uses, less than
15% of total unplatted new

BAD DESIGN
The graphic and text below illustrate design techniques that can be
used in new developments to replicate traditional neighborhood
design based on good planning and design practices. See pages
4-16 and 4-18 for additional development guidelines as applicable.
BETTER DESIGN
A. Building setbacks will vary according to building type and lot size
but should generally be consistent within a given block. In traditional
neighborhoods, setbacks should not exceed 35 feet from the front
property line or 45 feet from the curb, whichever is less.
B. Homes should be designed with architectural details that provide

visual interest and human scale for the street and the neighborhood.
The mix of architectural themes or styles should generally be
consistent within a neighborhood or development, but there should
be variation in floor plan, facade design, and color choice to avoid
monotony. Overly complicated rooflines with multiple pitches and
hips and/or excessive gables can negatively impact a street and should BEST DESIGN
be discouraged (see bad and better design examples on the right).
C. Utilize low fences, hedges or other landscaping to establish a layer

of privacy behind a sidewalk and residence, if a sidewalk is present.
D. Incorporate covered front porch or at least a raised stoop, preferably

covered and constructed with materials that relate to the overall
design of the home.
E. Decorative fencing and/or landscaping that visually defines the

single family lot at the street edge are encouraged.
F. Consider garage location and scale to avoid a “garage-scape” street

appearance. Garages should extend no further then the front facade
of the residence. If this is not feasible garages should be turned 90
degrees with windows provided on the side of the garage facing the
street.
uses that serve neighborhood
HIGH DENSITY needs, less than 15% of total
RESIDENTIAL unplatted new development
areas, typically located along
STATEMENT OF INTENT & major roadways/intersections to
TYPICAL USES the development area.
• Parks, trails and recreational
High Density Residential (HDR) facilities
areas are intended for housing • Municipal and utility facilities
with densities exceeding 9 units (e.g. well house, lift stations,
per acre. Areas classified as HDR substation, etc.)
will typically be predominately
multi-family attached units (i.e.
courtyard apartments up to mid-rise POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
apartments) with the potential for ZONING DISTRICTS:
some single-family attached, single-
family detached, duplex, four-plex, • R-4 High Density Residential
and other lower density housing (primary)
developments. Though multi- • R-3 Medium Density Residential
family housing is the predominant (secondary)
use in most neighborhoods, healthy, • PDD Planned Development
balanced neighborhoods may also District (secondary)
include other uses that support the • R-8 Manufactured/Mobile Home
needs of residents, including but not Community (tertiary)
limited to: • B-1 Neighborhood Business
(tertiary)
• Assisted living and nursing home • M-1 Mixed-Use (tertiary)
facilities
• Community centers
• Schools
• Day care centers
• Small pockets of Medium
Density Residential uses, less
than 25% of total unplatted new
development areas, typically
located adjacent to existing
developed or planned Low
Density Residential areas. The
density within these areas shall
be as prescribed within the MDR
future land use category.
• Small pockets of commercial

BEST PRACTICE DESIGN STRATEGIES BAD DESIGN
The graphic and text below illustrates how a multi-family building can
use varying techniques to create a look and feel that is compatible
with adjacent single-family development and best planning practice.
See page 13 for single-family and duplex guidelines, as well as
general guidelines on 23 through 26.
BETTER DESIGN
A. The front door should face the street and there should be a clear route
to the door from the street or sidewalk.
B. The mix of architectural themes or styles should generally be consistent

within a neighborhood or development, but there should be variation
in floor plan, facade design, and color choice to avoid monotony. When
adjacent to lower density residential buildings, larger buildings should
incorporate strategies to minimize the apparent size of the building,
including flat roofs instead of pitched roofs, deeper setbacks for upper
stories, and/ or variation in the depth of the setback along the building
BEST DESIGN
facade. Large, undifferentiated building walls and rooflines are strongly
discouraged. Desired architectural details include projecting bays/
porches and upper-level set-backs and offsets to the primary facade(s).
C. Building setbacks will vary according to building type and lot size but
should generally not exceed 40 feet.
D. Utilize low fences, hedges or other landscaping to establish a layer of

privacy behind the sidewalk.
E. Off-street parking is located in the side and rear yard.
F. Services areas and refuse containers should be located at the rear end
of the site and screened from public view. Also ground mounted or wall
mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened.
G. Garage doors facing the primary street is discouraged. If unavoidable,

recess it from the front facade(s) to minimize their visual impact on the
design.
NEIGHBORHOOD with multiple uses) or horizontal
MIXED USE mixed uses (compatible uses
adjacent to one another). Most
STATEMENT OF INTENT & residential uses should occur as
TYPICAL USES single-family attached units, multi-
family units, or above ground floor
The Neighborhood Mixed Use units in buildings with ground
(NMU) areas are intended to floor retail or office uses. New
provide a unique mix of small detached single family residential
scale commercial, medium to uses are discouraged in these
higher density residential, public areas, especially if adjacent to non-
and related uses in a bicycle and residential uses.
pedestrian-friendly environment.
Areas identified as NMU often serve Large Retail Developments (those proposed near existing or planned
as a buffer between Medium or High exceeding 20,000 square feet) residential areas.
Density Residential developments are discouraged in these areas
and Commercial or Industrial uses. unless they are part of a highly This category is intended to foster
Often these parcels are not located integrated, well planned mixed- mixed-use development areas
adjacent to primary arterials or use development. Single story strip that are characterized by quality
collectors roadways like properties commercial developments are also architecture, signage, landscaping,
in the Commercial category. The discouraged in these areas. If either and site design.
purpose of the NMU category is to of these types of development are
provide flexibility in determining proposed high quality site and POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
the most appropriate mix of building design features/materials ZONING DISTRICTS:
complementary land uses in close should be utilized to achieve the
proximity to one another. Example Village’s intent for these areas. • M-1 Mixed-Use (primary)
uses include but are not limited to: Outdoor storage of raw materials • PDD Planned Development
should be prohibited and outdoor District (primary)
• Attached single-family display of retail merchandise should • B-1 Neighborhood Business
residential be minimized. Outdoor areas for (primary)
• Multi-family residential dining are encouraged. Uses that • R-4 High Density Residential
• Senior housing require large parking lots, or have (secondary)
• Assisted living facilities a high frequency of semi-truck • B-2 Community Business
• Bed and breakfasts deliveries, are highly discouraged (secondary)
• Mixed-use residential/ in these areas. • B-3 Community Business
commercial (tertiary)
• Restaurants and entertainment Single stor y buildings are
• Small scale retail sales and discouraged in these areas. Where Refer to the next page, and pages
service single floor buildings are proposed 4-26 through 4-29, for design
• Professional offices exterior building facades should strategies.
• Civic and institutional give the appearance of at least a 1.5
• Parks, trails and recreational story building at building corners MIXED USE VILLAGE CENTER
facilities or primary customer entrances and
• Municipal and utility facilities include variations in building facade The Future Land Use Map identifies
(e.g. well house, lift stations, colors, materials, articulation and an area located north of WIS 10, east
substation, etc.) depths to promote a higher standard of Irish Road, south of West American
of aesthetics. The use of gabled Drive, and east of Towne Center Road
Neighborhood Mixed Use areas are roofs to blend with residential as a "Proposed Mixed Use Village
intended to provide areas for both buildings is also encouraged when Center." This area consists of 11
vertical mixed uses (i.e. buildings new commercial developments are parcels, under nine different owers,

The images and text below describe design strategies for Neighborhood Mixed Use. See page 4-26 through 4-29 for additional development
guidelines.
Incorporating generous amounts of First floor retail with second story office Single family home conversions (such as
landscaping, smaller scale building or residences with shallow setbacks to a bed and breakfast business) provide a
signage promote walkability good transition between single family
residential and non-residential uses
Monument sign with decorative wall and Two story commercial building with Town homes with zero front- and side-
planter at pedestrian scale gabled roof to blend with residential yard setbacks are appropriate in the
development Neighborhood Mixed Use area
Incorporation of decorative stone and Home-to-office conversions are a good One and half to two story neighborhood
wood building materials. Pitched roofs transition use and design as a buffer commercial
and gables should be considered for between single family residential
all buildings adjacent to residential neighborhoods and non-residential uses
development
totalling 32 acres in area, excluding just to the Village, but the region as
right-of-way including Shangra La well.
Lane which bisects the area. Only
67%
three of the properties currently Unlike many communities in
have improvements and the entire Wisconsin, the Village currently
area has a total property assessment does not have a downtown
value of approximatly $1.25M. The area that provides a central
land is adjacent to the Village's Tax focal point for the community
Increment Finance District #1, which to gather, live, work, and shop, of survey respondents think the
includes the new Community First in a pedestrian oriented mixed- Village should develop a mixed-
Credit Union development. use district. Most of the existing use, pedestrian oriented retail
commercial development within and entertainment
Throughout the process to create the Village consists of single story, "Village Center"
this plan members of the public, single use buildings, with each
Plan Commission, and Village separate business located on it's
Community Development Staff own lot with individual access points
expressed their desire to develop to roadways and front yard parking. While the Future Land Use Map
a mixed-use "Village Center;" a This type of development is very identifies a number of locations for
pedestrian oriented residential, auto-oriented, tends to contribute Neighborhood Mixed Uses under
retail, entertainment and civic to a feeling of urban sprawl and lacks the policies of this plan, this location
district that would be unique, not a defining unique sense of place. has the best potential to serve as a

defining planned "Village Center" • Most of the land area is currently that was redeveloped into a mixed-
considering the following factors: undeveloped. use pedestrian oriented commercial
center. The site is comparable in
• Convenient location. The site is • The development of a mixed- size to the location in Fox Crossing
adjacent to WIS 10 and CTH CB, use Village Center at this location (approx. 30 acres). Uses within the
two of the most heavily traveled would be compatbile with development include:
roadways in the Village, and only surrounding uses including
1 mile from USH 41. the existing and planned • 3-story townhouses
commercial development near
• West American Drive is also the intersection of WIS 10/CTH • smaller liner retail stores and
already improved as a four lane CB and the existing residential restaurants
collector with a central turn lane. development on the north side
of West American Drive. • movie theatre
• Existing regional off-road trails
are adjacent to the site on both The images below and on the next • 30,000 square foot grocery store
the north side of West American page provide an example of how
Drive and the west side of CTH this area of the Village could be • larger anchor retailer
CB. developed to serve as a pedestrian
oriented, mixed-use Village Center. • pocket parks and plazas
• Water and sewer utilities are The images are from the Hilldale
already within the vicinity of the Shopping Center in Madison, WI. • combination of surface and
site. The site was a former regional mall parking garages
The images below highlight some example of how the Village Center in order to guide future investments
of the best design strategies for in Fox Crossing could be developed to accomplish the Village's goal
this development that could be to meet the goals of the Village. A to create a pedestrian orientened
applicable for Fox Crossing. The detailed master plan for the site in mixed-use Village Center.
Hilldale development is but one Fox Crossing should be developed
Three story townhouses with shallow front setbacks line the front of the development. The
townhouses are buffered from the retail components of the development by a public parking
garage. Similar townhouse developments could line along West American Drive.
The main street through the development features:

• narrow 12' drive lanes with parking on one-side
• wide sidewalks with landscaping and decorative planters
• cross walk bump outs, raised cross-walk tables, pavement
painting and markers for pedestrian safety
• pedestrian scaled street lighting with light posts shorter
then building heights
• decorative pavement and street furniture
• zero setback buildings with high quality facades including
signages, awnings, and lighting
The development is broken

up by several mid-block
partitions that provide access
to rear parking lots and parking
garages. The partitions provide
space for public plazas and
additional liner shops.
Surface parking lots provide amble

landscaping and marked crosswalks.
Restaurants serve as corner tenants to

provide areas for outdoor dining.

COMMERCIAL The type and size of use will POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
be determined by location and ZONING DISTRICTS:
STATEMENT OF INTENT & business characteristics (e.g. size,
TYPICAL USES hours of operation, traffic impacts, • B-2 Community Business
etc.) For example, areas near (primary)
Commercial (C) areas are intended major transportation routes or near • B-3 Community Business
for retail, service, and office uses that highway intersections are generally (primary)
serve neighborhood, community better suited for larger retail uses • B-1 Neighborhood Business
and regional markets. These parcels (e.g. exceeding 20,000 square feet (secondary)
are typically adjacent to principal in size). • M-1 Mixed-Use (secondary)
arterial and collector roadways. • PDD Planned Development
Example uses include but are not Those areas located along local District (secondary)
limited to: streets or adjacent to residential • I-1 Light Industrial (tertiary)
neighborhoods are better suited for
• Professional Offices smaller commercial uses that serve Refer to the next page, and pages
• Retailers and shopping centers neighborhood needs. These uses 4-26 through 4-29, for design
• Clinics and health care facilities typically require smaller building strategies.
• Hotels footprints and parking lots and are
• Restaurants and entertainment less likely to have intensive truck and
businesses delivery needs.
• Gas Stations and convenience
stores Outdoor storage of raw materials is
• Automobile sales and services discouraged particularly if materials
• Parks, trails and recreational are not screened by a solid wall fence
facilities or landscaping. Outdoor areas for
• Municipal and utility facilities dining are encouraged while outdoor
(e.g. well house, lift stations, display of retail merchandise should
substation, etc.) be minimized.
The images and text below describe design strategies for highway commercial and mixed use business. See page 4-26 through 4-29 for
additional development guidelines.
This example shows

an office building
with a primary facade
using brick with stone
as an accent material,
meeting desired
natural color palette.
The images above illustrate techniques used to vary

the facade heights along a long facade.
Desired design for a retail building. The color palette

includes natural and earth tones. Building has uses
brick (primary) and EIFS (secondary), with architectural
details that breakdown the facade to human scale.
There are varying building planes and heights.
Left, retail building with primary facade using fiber cement An example of
siding with stone as an accent material. Right, retail building a commercial
with primary facade using stone and brick with EIFS as an building using
accent material. Both meeting a desired natural color palette. earth stones as the
primary color with
brighter accent
color for awnings
and roofing
The example above shows a raised parapet

wall and cornice that extends back to give
the perception of three-dimensional facade An example of a high quality office building
(desirable). The example on the right shows a using variations in building color, projections
“fake” parapet wall and cornice that is not three- and windows to break up long walls.
dimensional (as it lacks depth).

INDUSTRIAL • Wholesale trade
• Laboratories
STATEMENT OF INTENT & TYPICAL USES • Mini-storage
• Animal hospitals, shelters, and kennels
Industrial (I) areas are intended for business uses that • Lumberyards
typically require outside storage of raw materials • Professional Offices
or merchandise display, processing and assembly • Small municipal and utility facilities (e.g. well house,
of materials, and warehousing of goods. Businesses lift stations, substation, etc.)
typically require large single floor clear span buildings • Large municipal facilities (e.g. public works garage
and may have higher semi-truck traffic demand or or yard waste center)
require rail road access. Typical uses in these areas • Parks, trails and recreational facilities
have one or more characteristics which do not make
them conducive to being located adjacent to residential POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE ZONING
development, particularly if no or minimal on-site DISTRICTS:
mitigation is provided. Example uses include but are
not limited to: • I-1 Light Industrial (primary)
• I-2 Heavy Industrial (primary)
• Manufacturing • B-3 Community Business (secondary)
• Parts assembly • PDD Planned Development District (secondary)
• Packaging and bottling • B-2 Community Business (tertiary)
• Warehousing
• Distribution Centers
The images and text below describe design strategies for Industrial. See page 4-26 through 4-29 for additional development guidelines.
Weak Design Better Design
Left, a metal-faced (or concrete panel) building devoid of

Using generous amounts of landscaping to screen
any architectural merit or character. Right, an industrial
large industrial buildings from street view
building using stone as a base material and metal siding
making up to 75% of the remaining facade.
Monument signs
are encouraged in
all settings instead
of pole signs
Variations in facade depth and heights for industrial

buildings to break up long monotonous walls
GOVERNMENT, POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE
INSTITUTIONAL & ZONING DISTRICTS: The primary intent of these areas is to
UTILITIES retain sensitive natural areas in either
The Village does not maintain a public or private ownership for the
Government, Institutional & Utilities standalone parks or recreation benefit of maintaining fish and wildlife
(GIU) areas include places of worship, zoning district. Such uses are habitat, preventing and controlling
cemeteries, schools, community typically considered as permitted or water pollution, preventing erosion
centers, government facilities, conditional uses in another zoning and sedimentation, preventing
railroads, utilities and other parcels district. property damage caused by
that are owned by a public, quasi- flooding, preserving areas of natural
public, utility, or religious entity. Park NATURAL RESOURCE beauty, and providing areas for
and recreational uses are sometimes PROTECTION outdoor recreation. A majority of
a primary or secondary use on these the NRP represents areas that are
sites. The Natural Resource Protection vital to the region’s ecosystem and
(NRP) overlay classification identifies are key ingredients of the character
POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE sensitive lands that may be subject to and image of Fox Crossing. Thus,
ZONING DISTRICTS: development restrictions enforced development in areas designated
by Village, County, State, or Federal NRP shall be limited based on
• The Village does not maintain agencies. Mapped NRP areas include underlying local, county, state or
a standalone government or lands that meet one or more of the federal environmental regulations.
institutional zoning district. Such following conditions:
uses are typically considered as This classification is intended to
permitted or conditional uses in • Water bodies and wetlands function as an overlay district,
another zoning district. mapped as part of the WDNR such that the underlying future
Wetland Inventory land use classification (Medium-
PARKS, RECREATION • 100-Year Floodplains based on Density Residential, Commercial,
AND CONSERVANCY FEMA maps etc.) remains in place, but the
• Areas with slopes averaging 12% overlay classification indicates the
STATEMENT OF INTENT & or more based on USDA-NRCS possibility of additional restrictions
TYPICAL USES Soils data on development.
Parks, Recreation and Conservancy Areas shown as NRP on the Village’s Landowners and developers are
(PRC) areas are intended for active Future Land Use Map do not advised that land within NRP areas
and passive recreation uses or constitute the limits of all wetlands, may be restricted from building
preservation of natural areas, floodplains, or steep slopes that development, site grading, or
stormwater facilities, or drainage may be present within the Village’s vegetation clearing under the local,
basins. Areas identified as PRC planning area. Mapped NRP areas are county, state, or federal regulations.
should be preserved for passive derived from third party sources and Where building development is
and active recreational uses. Some are generally considered sufficient permissible additional building
stormwater management or other for the intent of this planning setbacks and buffer yards beyond
utility/institutional uses (e.g. water document. They are not a substitute the minimum requirements are
towers) may be located within these for field or site level delineations encouraged. Recreational uses,
areas. that may be required by local, agricultural and silviculture
county, state, or federal agencies operations may be permitted in
prior to development approval. The accordance with local, county, state,
NRP areas illustrated on the Future and federal laws. Best Management
Land Use Map are not a substitute Practices are highly encouraged in
for official Shoreland-Wetland and these areas.
Floodplain zoning maps.

2. All building faces visible from a public street should
use design features similar to the primary front facade.
GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
BUILDING DESIGN
1. Buildings should establish vertical proportions for the

street façade, and for the elements within that façade,
rather than long, horizontal blank walls. Verticality
can be emphasized using the following techniques:
expression of structural bays, variation in material,
variation in building plane (projections or recessed
bays), articulation of the roofline or cornice, and use 3. A positive visual termination at the top of the building
of vertically-proportioned windows. should be established (e.g., pitched roofs with gable(s)
facing the street or a flat roof with a defined cornice).
4. Pitched roofs should have a slope no less than 5:12.
5. Accessory buildings and structures should be

compatible with the principal building in terms of
building facade character, roof shapes, materials,
colors and architectural details.
EXTERIOR MATERIALS & COLORS LANDSCAPING & PARKING
1. Material should be of durable quality, especially along 1. Interesting or creative landscape architectural designs
street-facing facades (e.g., kiln-fired brick, terra cotta, that use a diverse variety of native plants integrated
wood siding / details, fiber cement siding, engineered with other landscaping materials or features should
wood siding, and high-quality natural cut stone or be provided to avoid uncreative and monotonous
brick veneer). The use of low reflectance materials with landscaping.
subtle, neutral, or earth tone colors on the facade is 2. Parking lots should be landscaped in order to minimize
encouraged. the impact of large expanses of pavement. Plantings
2. A schema that incorporates more than one material and low fences located between parking areas and
and color is encouraged, especially in highlighting the public right-of-way are strongly encouraged;
expression lines or details that provides visual interest. however, for pedestrian safety, these features should
3. Secondary facade facing a public street (such as on not obscure vision between three and six feet above
corner buildings) should utilize the same materials ground.
as the primary front facade transitioning at an
architectural feature (e.g., column, structural bay
articulation, protruding/receding building plane).
3. Shared parking lots are encouraged as a means to

reduce total impervious surfaces, reduce access points
to the street (and across sidewalks), and provide
more convenient access for customers. Side and rear
parking is encouraged.
4. Fluorescent colors are strongly discouraged with
bright colors acceptable as a secondary (accent) color.
Development
STREET RELATIONSHIP #1
Development
1. The building’s primary entrance should be connected

to the public sidewalk and/or street by an attractive
#2
and accessible path/walkway.
The above concept illustrates shared parking between two

developments connected by an access drive, and includes
vegetative buffers along all pedestrian routes.

2. Signage should be integrated with the architectural
EXTERIOR LIGHTING & SIGNAGE concept of the development in scale, detailing, use
of color and materials, and placement.
1. Exterior lighting should be designed to complement
the character of the building, and should not adversely
impact neighboring properties or streets (i.e. light
tresspass, excessive lighting, direct glare). Use of dark-
sky compliant / full cutoff lighting fixtures is preferred.
3. Any exterior signage lights are encouraged to be

mounted above the sign and directed downward to
minimize light pollution.
SERVICE AREAS & SCREENING SUSTAINABILITY
1. S creening should be compatible with building 1. Consider using green roof technologies, wherever
architecture and other site features. feasible.
2. Use non-intrusive outdoor lighting (e.g. minimum
wattage necessary to safely light areas, full cut-off
fixtures, no light spillage to adjacent properties) and
LED technologies.
3. Wherever feasible, include bio-filtration basins and
swales as a part of the stormwater systems on site to
promote infiltration and groundwater recharge and
reduce sediment runoff.
2. Trash and recycling containers should be located or 4. Consider using porous paving materials (e.g., asphalt,
screened so they are not visible from the public street concrete and pavers) in parking areas, walkways, etc.
or adjacent properties. 5. Use drought tolerant landscaping materials to limit
water use.
6. Incorporate solar panels to reduce fossil fuel energy
needs.
3. Placement of service boxes and gas meters should be

located away from the pedestrian zone, such as in the
rear yard, in the side yard set behind the front building
plane, or in the front yard following the minimum
building setback restrictions.
4. Rooftop mechanical equipment should be located
or screened so that they are not visible from a public
street or adjacent properties.

Chapter 5 I mpl ementat ion
Ch a pte r 5
Co nte nt s
Implementation
Chapter 5 outlines how the vision, goals, objectives, and strategies of the
plan will be implemented in everyday decisions and annual goal-setting
and budgeting and how the plan should be updated and amended when
necessary. This chapter includes the following sections:
»» Guiding Decisions
»» Implementation Tools
»» Plan Adoption & Amendments
»» Plan Consistency & Severability
»» Action Plan
Chapter 5 | Implementation 5-1

GU ID IN G D E C I SION S
GUIDING D A I LY where actions that are inconsistent Department Heads should be

DECISIONS with this plan are deemed to be expected to know and track the
in the best interest of the Village, various goals, objectives, policies
Responsibility for implementing this the Planning Commission should and actions laid out in this plan,
plan lies primarily with the Village initiate efforts to amend the plan and to reference that content as
Board, Planning Commission, and to better reflect Village interest. This appropriate in communications
Village Staff. will help to reinforce the legitimacy with residents and elected and
of the plan as an important tool in appointed officials. All of the
VILLAGE BOARD Village functions. Village’s contracted staff should
also be aware of the plan and the
The Village Board sets priorities, OTHER VILLAGE BOARDS/ connections between the plan and
controls budgets and tax rates, COMMISSIONS Village projects. The purpose of this
and usually has the final say on extra effort is to strengthen staff
key aspects of public and private In some cases, particular initiatives recommendations and reinforce
development projects. The value and action items listed in this plan the plan as a relevant tool integral
and legitimacy of this plan is directly may be more appropriately carried to Village functions.
related to the degree to which out by another Village commission
Board members are aware of the such as the Park Commission, or
plan and expect Village actions to in cooperation with other units GUIDING ANNUAL
be consistent with this plan. Each of government, business and DECISIONS
Board member should have a copy service organizations, or non-profit
of this plan and should be familiar agencies. In such cases, this plan To provide lasting value and
with the major goals, objectives, should serve as a foundation for influence, this plan must be used
and strategies described herein. Village-related decision making. and referenced regularly, especially
The Village Board should expect and Village staff and officials should during annual goal-setting,
require that staff recommendations take an active lead role in sharing budgeting and capital planning
and actions both reference and this plan with other organizations, processes. To inform these annual
remain consistent with this plan. communicating the intent of processes, the Planning Commission
relevant objectives and policies. should prepare, with input from
PLAN COMMISSION Village Department Heads, a concise
VILLAGE STAFF Comprehensive Plan Annual Report
Land use and development with the following information:
recommendations are a core Key Village staff have a significant
component of this plan, and the influence on the selection and • Action items in progress or
Planning Commission has a major completion of all kinds of capital completed during the prior 12
role in guiding those decisions. and operational projects. It is months (celebrate success!)
Planning Commission members imperative that individuals in key
must each have a copy of this roles know about, support, and • Planning Commission
plan and must be familiar with actively work to implement the recommendations for action
its content, especially Chapter 4, various strategies and actions items to pursue during the next
Future Land Use. It is generally in this plan. Department Heads 12 months.
the responsibility of the Planning should consult and reference the
Commission to determine whether comprehensive plan during goal- • Staff recommendations for any
proposed development projects setting and budgeting processes, amendments to the adopted
are consistent with this plan, and during planning for major public plan.
to make recommendations that are projects, and in the review of private
consistent with this plan. In cases development projects:
IMPL E M E NT AT ION TOOLS
The Comprehensive Plan Annual I M P L E M E N TAT I O N • Erosion and Stormwater

Report/Working Action Plan should TOOLS Ordinances
be maintained on an annual basis,
starting with the actions in this plan Many of the strategies identified in • Official Maps
and evolving over time. Completed this plan presume the use of existing
actions should be celebrated and Village ordinances and programs.
removed, while those actions not The Village’s key implementation FUNDING TOOLS
yet carried out should be given tools include:
new deadlines (if appropriate) and • Tax Incremental Financing (TIF)
assigned to specific individuals, OPERATIONAL TOOLS Districts
boards or commissions for
completion per the new schedule • Annual Budget Process • Grant Programs
and Village Board directive. If the
updated action plan is consistent • Capital Improvement Plans • General Fund Revenues
with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the comprehensive plan, • Fees & Special Assessments
updating the action plan should not REGULATORY TOOLS
require an amendment to the plan • Fundraising/Private Donation
and can be approved simply by • Land Use Regulations (including
Village Board action. zoning, land division, subdivision • Utility Revenues
and extraterritorial land use
controls)
• Building Codes (including

plumbing and electrical codes)

PL A N AD O P T I ON AN D AME N D ME N T S
• Any individuals who request,
ADOPTION, • The date, time and location of the in writing, notification of the
AMENDMENTS AND hearing, proposed comprehensive plan
UPDATES ordinance or public hearing. Each
• A summary of the proposed plan such individual must be sent a
The procedures for comprehensive or plan amendment, notice of the public hearing and a
plan adoption or amendment copy of the ordinance at least 30
are established by Wisconsin’s • The local government staff who days prior to the public hearing.
Comprehensive Planning Law may be contacted for additional The Village may charge a fee equal
(66.1001, Stats.). This comprehensive information, to the cost of providing such notice
plan and any future amendments and copy.
must be adopted by the Village Board • Where to inspect and how to
in the form of an adoption ordinance obtain a copy of the proposed plan
approved by a majority vote. Two or amendment before the hearing. Finally, the Village should send the
important steps must occur before the notice and a copy of the proposed
Village Board may adopt or amend the The notice should also provide a plan, or plan amendment, to the Plan
plan: the Planning Commission must method for submitting written Distribution List (see next page). These
recommend adoption and the Village comments, and those comments draft distributions are not required
must hold an official public hearing. should be read or summarized at the by statute prior to adoption, but are
public hearing. strongly recommended as a matter of
PLANNING COMMISSION courtesy and good planning practice.
RECOMMENDATION DRAFT DISTRIBUTION The Village should coordinate directly
AND PUBLIC HEARING with the local public library serving the
The Planning Commission NOTIFICATIONS Village to make a copy of the proposed
recommends adoption or amendment plan, or plan amendment, available for
by passing a resolution that very briefly The Village is required to provide viewing by any interested party.
summarizes the plan and its various direct notice of the public hearing to
components. The resolution should all of the following as they apply to the PLAN ADOPTION
also reference the reasons for creating municipal limits:
or amending the plan and the public This plan and any future amendments
involvement process used during the • An operator who has obtained, or become official Village policy when the
planning process. The resolution must made application for, a permit that Village Board passes, by a majority vote
pass by a majority vote of the Planning is described under s. 295.12(3)(d). of all elected members, an adoption
Commission, and the approved ordinance. The Village Board may
resolution should be included in the • A person who has registered a choose to revise the plan after it has
adopted plan document. marketable nonmetallic mineral been recommended by the Planning
deposit under s. 295.20. Commission and after the public
PUBLIC HEARING hearing. It is not a legal requirement to
• Any other property owner or consult with the Planning Commission
Prior to adopting this plan, or plan leaseholder who has an interest on such changes prior to adoption,
amendment, the Village (either Village in property pursuant to which the but, depending on the significance of
Board or Planning Commission) must person may extract nonmetallic the revision, such consultation may be
hold at least one public hearing to mineral resources, if the property advisable.
discuss the proposed plan. At least owner or leaseholder requests in
30 days prior to the hearing a Class writing that the local government
1 notice must be published that unit provide the property owner or
contains, at minimum, the following: leaseholder notice of the hearing.
ADOPTED PLAN AMENDMENT VS. PLAN PLAN UPDATE
DISTRIBUTION UPDATE
Wisconsin’s comprehensive planning
Following final adoption of this plan, PLAN AMENDMENT statute (66.1001) requires that this
and again following any amendments plan be updated at least once every
to the plan, a copy of the plan or From time to time the Village may be 10 years. Unlike an amendment, the
amendment must be sent to each of faced with an opportunity, such as a plan update is a major re-write of
the following: development proposal, that does not the plan document and supporting
fit the plan but is widely viewed to maps. The purpose of the update is
1. Every governmental body that is be appropriate for the Village. Should to incorporate new data and ensure
located in whole or in part within the Village wish to approve such an that the plan remains relevant to
the boundaries of the Village, opportunity, it must first amend the current conditions and decisions.
including any school district, plan so that the decision is consistent The availability of new Census or
sanitary district, or other special with the plan. Such amendments mapping data and/or a series of
district. should be carefully considered and significant changes in the community
should not become the standard may justify an update after less than
2. The clerk of every town, city, village, response to proposals that do not 10 years. Frequent requests for
and county that borders the Village. fit the plan. Frequent amendments amendments to the plan should
to meet individual development signal the need for a comprehensive
3. The regional planning commission
proposals threatens the integrity of update.
in which the Village is located.
the plan and the planning process
4. The public library that serves the and should be avoided.
area in which the Village is located.
Any change to the plan goals,
5. T he Comprehensive Planning objectives, polices or maps
Program at the Department of constitutes an amendment to the
Administration. plan and must follow the adoption/
amendment process described in
Electronic copies of the plan or plan this section. Amendments may
amendment, or notification of how to be proposed by either the Village
download the plan from the Village's Board, Planning Commission, Village
website shall be deemed sufficient. Staff, village property owners or
developers. Amendments may be
made at any time using this process.

PL A N C O N S I ST E NCY
A ND S E VE R AB I LI TY
PLAN CONSISTENCY • It is compatible with the
SEVERABILITY
Once formally adopted, the plan proposed future land uses and If any provision of this Comprehensive
becomes a tool for communicating densities/intensities contained in Plan will be found to be invalid or
the Village’s land use policies and for this plan, unconstitutional, or if the application
coordinating legislative decisions. of this Comprehensive Plan to any
Per the requirements of Wisconsin’s • It carries out, as applicable, any person or circumstances is found
Comprehensive Planning Law, after specific proposals for community to be invalid or unconstitutional
January 1, 2010, if a local government facilities, including transportation by court of law, such invalidity or
unit enacts or amends any of the facilities, other specific public unconstitutionality will not affect
following ordinances, the ordinance actions, or actions proposed the other provisions or applications
must be consistent with that local by nonprofit and for-profit of this Comprehensive Plan,
governmental unit’s comprehensive organizations that are contained which can be given effect without
plan: in the plan. the invalid or unconstitutional
provision or application. If any
• Official maps requirement or limitation attached
The State of Wisconsin planning to an authorization given under
• Local subdivision regulations legislation requires that the this Comprehensive Plan is found
implementation element describe invalid, it shall be presumed that the
• General zoning ordinances and how each of the nine-elements will authorization would not have been
zoning maps be integrated and made consistent granted without the requirement
with the other elements of the or limitation and, therefore, said
• Shoreland/wetland zoning plan. Prior to adoption of the plan, authorization shall also be invalid.
ordinances the Village reviewed, updated, and
completed all elements of this plan
An action will be deemed consistent together, and no inconsistencies
if: were found.
• It furthers, or at least does

not interfere with, the goals,
objectives, and policies of this
plan,
A C T IO N P LA N
The following section provides a list additional time may be necessary. 2. Implement the recommendations
of the top actions items to pursue All action items are perceived to have found within the Village's
over the next 10 years in order to a deadline of 10 years; the timeline 2015 Bicycle and Pedestrian
implement the vision, goals, and before the next statutory update of Plan. The Village's Bicycle and
objectives of this plan. This list was this plan. Pedestrian Plan contains a
developed in-part from the issues and number of infrastructure and non-
opportunities and list of strategies Decisions regarding the timing, infrastructure recommendations.
outlined in Chapter 3, and from the budgeting, and coordination of All planned bike/ped facilities are
results of the Community Survey each action item within the next 10 shown on the Future Land Use Map
(refer to Appendix B). These action years will be reviewed at least once of this plan. Non-infrastructure
items supplement other strategies annual by the Planning Commission recommendations have not be
described for each planning element and Village Board as part of the reprinted within this plan but
within Chapter 3. municipal budget setting process instead referenced as a component
or the Comprehensive Plan Annual of this plan.
PRIORITIES, TIMELINES & Report. • Timeframe: Long-term
RESPONSIBILITIES
MEASURING SUCCESS • Responsibility: Streets, Parks,
Accompanying each action are and Community Development
recommended timeframes for Success in implementing the action Staff
completion (i.e. on-going/annual, plan will vary. In some cases, success is
short-term, mid-term and long- evaluated based on whether a facility 3. Install or repair existing sidewalks
term) and the entity (or entities) with is ultimately built (e.g. a niche/small or multi-modal trails along collector
primary responsibility in pushing the grocery store) or if a study or zoning streets or near schools and parks.
action item forward. Since this is a code amendment is completed. In This action item is a sub-action
planning document it is assumed that other cases, success may be judged to the previous action item and
most action items will be initiated by whether interim implementation serves to prioritize the installation
by Community Development tasks have been completed or of new sidewalks and bike
Department Staff (CDDS) with some the degree to which change has facilities to promote connectivity
level of involvement by the Planning occurred. Change can be measured to community destinations and
Commission (PC), and in most cases both quantitatively (e.g. the number regional trail networks.
final approval by the Village Board. of new business or jobs created
The action items are not listed since plan adoption) or qualitatively • Timeframe: Mid-term
sequentially and multiple actions (e.g. degree to which residents are
may be pursued at the same time. satisfied with improvements). • Responsibility: Streets, Parks,
Short-term actions are generally and Community Development
defined as actions to be completed ACTION ITEMS Staff
within two years of adoption of this
plan. Mid-term action actions are 1. Maintain a rolling 5-year Capital 4. C onsider alternative funding
to be completed within five years Improvement Plan to plan methods to close transportation
of adoption of this plan and long- for the annual construction funding gaps (e.g. impact fees,
term actions are to be completed and maintenance of Village wheel tax, grants, etc.) to maintain
within 10 years. The characterization transportation facilities, public high-quality streets, bicycle and
of an action as mid- or long-term buildings, Village equipment, and pedestrian facilities. Either the
does not imply that efforts towards Village utilities. Planning Commission, or an
completion of those actions should, ad-hoc committee, should meet
or can't, beginning immediately after • Timeframe: On-going/Annual to review, discuss, and make
adoption of this plan. It is simply an recommendations to the Village
• R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Vi l l a g e Board regarding the establishment
indication that due to the complexity,
Administrator/Department of a wheel tax to aid in funding
cost, or coordination efforts needed
Heads transportation infrastructure
to implement the action item

improvements. available under the Community Department/Parks
Development portion of the Committee
• Timeframe: Short-term Village’s website.
• Responsibility: CDDS/PC or 12. Revise the Woodland Prairie Park
• Timeframe: Short-Term master Plan. Include areas in the
other ad-hoc committee
• Responsibility: CDDS park for both active and passive
recreational opportunities. In
5. E stablish minimum levels of
addition, consider the inclusion
service for all transportation 9. C onsider creation of a leaf
of facilities that could be used to
facilities within the Village. To aid composting facility.
host community events/festivals.
in capital improvement planning,
the Village should annually rate • Timeframe: Short-Term
• Timeframe: Short-term
the condition of all Village streets
• Responsibility: Sustainability
and paths. • R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Pa r k s
Committee
Department/Parks
• Timeframe: On- going/ Committee
Annual 10. Provide information about
clean sweep programs , garage
• Responsibility : Streets 13. Create a marketing plan to
and recycling, services, yard
Department recruit new industries based on
waste collection, and other
the Village's unique locational
similar programs and services to
attributes, skilled labor force and
6. Work with Valley Transit to residents and businesses at least
full range of municipal services.
improve the service for Fox once annually.
Crossing residents. Discussions • Timeframe: Short-term
should include the possibility • Timeframe: On- going/
of additional bus stops, more Annual • Responsibility: CDDS/PC
benches/shelters at stops, and
• Responsibility: CDDS
more education about bus routes 14. Encourage the creation of
and how to utilize the system. a business association that
11. I m p l e m e n t the
will support the Village of Fox
• Timeframe: On- going/ recommendations within
Crossing. Consider hosting an
Annual the Village's 2017-2021
annual meeting for leaders of
Comprehensive Outdoor
• Responsibility: CDDS local businesses to meet and
Recreation Plan (CORP) and
discuss common issues, trends,
update the plan every five years.
and opportunities in Fox Crossing.
7. C reate and enforce property The Village's CORP contains a
maintenance codes, develop number of infrastructure and non- • Timeframe: On- going/
funding programs and apply for infrastructure recommendations. Annual
grants that are geared toward All recommended improvements
housing rehabilitation and to existing and planned parks • Responsibilit y : Village
maintenance. are shown on the Neighborhood Administrator/CDDS
District Future Land Use Maps in
• Timeframe: On- going/ Chapter 4. Non-infrastructure 15. Identify opportunities to
Annual recommendations have not redevelop blighted and under
be reprinted within this plan utilized waterfront properties
but instead referenced as a for higher density residential or
component of this plan. mixed uses. The Village should
8. Create a map of properties that are
study existing properties along
included under existing restrictive • Timeframe: Mid-term the waterfront and identify those
covenants with hyperlinks to
• R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Pa r k s locations that may provide the
those covenants. Make the map
best opportunity to redevelop of right-of-way lines and site • R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Vi l l a g e
for mixed-use to provide greater boundaries of streets, highways, Administrator and CDDS
public access and enjoyment of the parkways, parks, and p1aygrounds.
waterfront. The Village may also include on 22. Identify ways in which Fox
its official map the locations of Crossing can visually set itself apart
• Timeframe: Short-term railway rights-of-way, public transit from surrounding communities
facilities, and those waterways (e.g. stronger "gateway" features,
which have been included in a public art, unique signage,
comprehensive surface water unique street lighting, etc.) and
16. Provide adjacent municipalities, drainage plan. Such a map has implement these techniques.
Outagamie and Winnebago the force of law and is deemed to Either the Planning Commission,
counties, with a copy of this land be conclusive with respect to the or an ad-hoc committee, should
use plan and an opportunity location and width of both existing meet to review, discuss, and
to provide comments prior to and proposed streets, highways, make recommendations to the
adoption or future amendments. waterways, and parkways and the Village Board regarding technics
• Timeframe: On-going/Annual location and extent of existing the Village can use to further this
and proposed railway rights-of- objection. Discussions should
• Responsibility: CDDS way, public transit facilities, and include methods to promote
parks and playgrounds shown a unique community identity
17. Develop urban service phasing on the map. The Statutes further through both public investments
plans that are coordinated with the provide that the official map may and as part of private development.
land use, utility and transportation be extended to include areas
plans prepared by the East Central beyond the corporate limits lines • Timeframe: Short-term
Wisconsin Regional Planning but within the extraterritorial
plat approval jurisdiction of the • Responsibility: CDDS/PC or
Commission (ECWRPC) and the other ad-hoc committee
Future Land Use Map of this plan. municipality.
• Timeframe: Short-term • Timeframe: Short-term 23. Strengthen the Village’s

Zoning Ordinance relating to site
• Responsibility: CDDS • Responsibility: CDDS/PC and building design, lighting,
landscaping and signage to
18. Pursue coordination with 20. Meet with adjacent communities promote higher quality design
school districts to include student to coordinate Official Maps along and aesthetics especially for
representation and involvement in shared boundaries. properties along transportation
Board, commission and committee corridors, adjacent to single-family
meetings to foster the next • Timeframe: On-going/Annual residential land uses, and within
generation of Village leaders. the Village Center. The following
• R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Vi l l a g e
Administrator/Department are specific recommendations:
• Timeframe: On-going/Annual
Heads Section 31.7-34(b). Consider
• R e s p o n s i b i l i t y : Vi l l a g e
21. Maintain/update existing adding a requirement to install
Administrator/Department
boundary and service agreements off-road bike facilities where
Heads
with adjacent communities as development sites include or are
19. Update and maintain an Official needed and create new boundary adjacent to existing or planned
Map to coordinate long-term and serve agreements with off-road trails identified in this
facility planning. Section 62.23(6) adjacent communities were none plan or on the Village's Official
(b) of the Wisconsin Statutes currently exist. Map.
provides that the village board of
• Timeframe: Mid-term Revise Section 31.7-35(b)(2) to
any village may establish an official
apply to multi-family and mixed
map for the precise designation

use buildings. • Responsibility: CDDS/PC reinvestment in these areas the
Village should develop corridor
Revise Section 31.7-35(b)(4) 25. Develop a detailed master plan redevelopment plans along with
to apply to all commercial for the area identified on the Future creating new TIF districts to provide
buildings regardless of the Land Use Map for the Proposed a funding mechanism. These
zoning district they are located Mixed-Use Village Center. Chapter actions could be corridinated with
in. 4 includes some preliminary design the City of Menasha.
Add Section 31.7-36 to address guidelines for the development
minimum and maximum of this area. The Village should • Timeframe: Mid-Term
requirements for outdoor develop a more detailed plan
for the area that would provide • Responsibility: CDDS/PC
lighting on private properties.
recommendations regarding
Revise Section 31.7-4(a)(10) to land assembly; site layout and 27. Develop detailed master
remove the recommendation uses; public infrastructure plans for all properties within
that parcels in the M-1 District improvements; site and building the Village that are former or
should be a minimum of five design standards; and potential current quarrying operations to
acres. funding mechanisms. guide redevelopment of these
properties after quarry operations
Revise Table 7-1 to allow Multi- • Timeframe: Short-term are completed. Jointly work with
family Buildings, Townhouses, the City of Menasha to develop
and General Retail Sales as • Responsibility: CDDS/PC a plan for the former quarry near
a permitted uses in the M-1 Appleton Road and Ninth Street.
District. 26. Develop corridor redevelopment This could include creation of
plans for Valley Road and a joint TIF district to provide a
Revise Exhibit 8-7 in Section and Appleton Road. The funding mechanism to aid in
31.8-16 to include buffer yard Redevelopment Opportunities redevelopment of the site.
requirements for B-1, B-2 and Maps in Appendix A highlights
M-1 districts where adjacent to the concentration of residential • Timeframe: Long-Term
residential properties. and commercial properties along
these corridors that are in need • Responsibility: CDDS/PC
Include provisions that would of redevelopment. To faciliate
allow the Village to provide
incentives for developments
that utilize on-site solar,
wind, or geothermal energy
technologies or other energy
efficiency or sustainability
measures.
• Responsibility: CDDS/PC
24. Create an illustrative handbook

of best site and architectural
design strategies to provide
to developers and builders.
Separate the handbook by types
of development.
Appendix A Co mmu n i t y I n di cato rs R ep or t
Appe n d ix A
Co nte nt s
Community Indicators Report
The Community Indicators Report is a summary of current conditions and
recent trends in the Village of Fox Crossing based on the best available
data. The purpose of these indicators is to enable informed choices about
the future of the Village. This report is included as an appendix to the
Comprehensive Plan so that it may be easily updated from time to time as
new data becomes available.
»» Demographics
»» Housing
»» Mobility & Transportation
»» Economic Prosperity
»» Agriculture & Natural Resources
»» Community Facilities & Services
»» Community Character
»» Collaborations & Partnership
»» Land Use
Appendix A | Community Indicators Report A-1

ABOUT THE DATA Because the ACS estimates are based The second important note when
on a sample of the population, they using ACS estimates is that they
These indicators utilize a mixture include some error. The margin of cannot be compared to decennial
of local, county, state, and federal error is reported for each estimate, census data because they are
data sources. The U.S. Census has and is an indication of how reliable measured in different ways. While
historically been a key source of data the estimate is. As a general rule, some of the tables in this report show
for many community indicators. the ACS data is quite reliable at the both decennial census data and ACS
Much of the information previously State level, generally reliable at the data, caution should be used when
collected by the decennial U.S. County level, and less reliable at trying to draw conclusions about
Census is now collected only by the municipal level. The margin of trends by comparing the two sets
the American Community Survey error makes the data much more of numbers.
(ACS). The ACS is an ongoing survey difficult to interpret. To simplify
that collects sample data every year tables in this plan, the reliability of
and reports estimates of population each value is indicated simply by
and housing characteristics. For the formatting of the text. For each
communities smaller than 20,000 ACS estimate, the margin of error is
people, the best available estimates divided by the estimate. If the error
are reported as rolling averages is 10% or greater than the estimate,
over 5-year periods – they indicate the value in the table is bolded and
average conditions over the underlined. In graphs, the ACS data
reporting period rather than a exceeding this 10% error threshold
snapshot of a single point of time. will be denoted at the bottom of the
graph.
Village of Malibu Chevrolet County
N
Number % Number %
ote: This report is a
1980 124 2.2 79,564 5.0
summary of current
1990 138 3.4 100,601 6.0
conditions and recent
2000 145 10 145,452 7.0
Census data trends in the Village of Fox
2010 150 12.3 179,638 8.0 Crossing, based on the best
available data. The purpose of
Avg.2009-2013 378 253,053 ACS data these indicators is to enable
informed choices about the
future of the Village.
error exceeds 10% error less than 10%
A-2 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
DE MO G R AP H I CS
POPULATION for the average of the Fox Cities Winnebago County (15.7%) and
(11.9%), Winnebago County (6.5%) State’s (14.1%) projected growth
The Village of Fox Crossing is located and the State (6.0%). Yet, some of rates.
in Winnebago County, in eastern the communities surrounding Fox
Wisconsin. The Village is bisected Crossings saw even greater growth AGE & SEX
by USH 41 and USH 10/441, and rate, including Town of Grand Chute In 2010, the median age in the
divided east/west by Little Lake (120%), Town of Greenville (233%) Village was 38.5, which is slightly
Butte des Morts. and Village of Harrison (629%) higher than the average in the Fox
during the same period. Cities (38.2) and Winnebago County
The Village is surrounded by four (37.9). The largest age cohort in
incorporated communities: the From 2010 to 2015, the population Fox Crossing is that of 35-54 year
City of Appleton (to the north), in the Village has grown by 2.4%, or olds. They comprise 28.4% of the
City of Menasha (to the east and 0.5% per year. This lower growth total population. The Village of Fox
south) , the Village of Harrison (to rate can be partially explained Crossing has a higher proportion
the east), and the City of Neenah due to the Great Recession, which (13.8%) of “senior citizens” (i.e. 65
(to the south). Fox Crossing is also impacted most communities across and over) as compared to average
surrounded by the Towns of Grand the Nation. of the Fox Cities (11.6%) and
Chute and Greenville to the north, Winnebago County (13.4%). In the
Town of Neenah to the south, and Based on Wisconsin Department future, the cohort of those 65 and
the Town of Clayton to the west. of Administration (WIDOA) data, older is expected to increase as
the Village’s 2040 population is baby boomers age.
From 1980 to 2010 the population projected to be 23,140, which is an
in the Village of Fox Crossing grew increase of 25.1% since year 2010, In 2010, 50% of the population was
by 51.3%, or an average of 1.7% per (0.8% per year). This exceeds the male and 50% female.
year. This surpassed the growth rate average for the Fox Cities (23.5%),

Village of Village of Town of City of Winnebago

Fox Crossing Harrison* Grand Chute Neenah County Wisconsin
1980 12,226 3,541 9,529 22,432 131,772 4,705,642
1990 13,975 3,195 14,490 23,219 140,320 4,891,769
2000 15,858 5,756 18,392 24,507 156,763 5,363,675
2010 18,498 10,839 20,919 25,501 166,994 5,686,986
2015 18,950 10,200 22,080 26,010 169,925 5,783,015
2020 20,070 11,760 23,980 26,990 177,050 6,005,080
2025 21,080 13,190 25,700 27,810 183,230 6,203,850
2030 22,020 14,600 27,320 28,520 188,680 6,375,910
2035 22,680 15,700 28,500 28,870 191,710 6,476,270
2040 23,140 16,550 29,270 28,970 193,130 6,491,635
*Incorporated in 2013

Source 2010 Census; Wisconsin Dept. of Admin.
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
PERCENT CHANGE
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Village of Fox Crossing Fox Cities Average Winnebago County Wisconsin
*The Fox Cities Average includes the Cities of Neenah, Menasha, Appleton, Kaukauna; the Villages of Kimberly, Combined Locks, Harrison,
Sherwood, Little Chute; and the Towns of Kaukauna, Buchanan, Grand Chute, Greenville, Neenah, Vandenbroek, Harrison.
N
Age Profile, 2010
Source 2010 Census ote: According to the
WIDOA, predictions of
28.4% the population are based on the
21.1% primary assumption that past
demographic and economic
12.4% 12.1% 12.1% 13.8% patterns, on a large scale, will hold
true into the future. Population
projections are not a statement of
what will happen, but an inference
of what might happen, if past
patterns and probable future
trends hold true.
<10 10 - 20 35 - 55 - 65+
19 - 34 54 64
H OU S I NG
HOUSEHOLD COUNTS 2040. This equates to an addition of vacancy rate is holding around
2,417 housing units, an increase of 2.9%. A healthy balance of owner-
From 1990 to 2010 the number 28.9%, or 1.0% per year. This growth occupied vacancy rates is typically
of households in the Village of projection exceeds population 1-2% reflecting the fact that sellers
Fox Crossing grew by 48.5%, or growth projections indicating typically live in their homes while
1.6% per year. From 2000 - 2010, that the average population per they are on the market and units
a 26.2% increase in the number of household will continue to decline are rarely vacant.
households occurred in the Village, to 2.26 by year 2040.
or 2.6% per year. This was greater The graphs on pages A-6 - A-7
than the increases seen in the OCCUPANCY & provides several insights to the
average of the Fox Cities (17.5%) and HOUSING STOCK Village of Fox Crossing’s housing
Winnebago County (11.0%). stock, as listed below:
The housing stock in the Village of
The Village’s “persons per household” Fox Crossing is similar to the typical • Approximately 28% of the
dropped from 2.61 in 1990 to 2.33 in housing stock found in a community Village’s housing stock was built
2010, which is an overall reduction with a population of similar size in prior to 1970. These older homes
of 10.9% (averages to 0.5% per the Midwest. The most prevalent are prone to needing more
year). This trend is consistent with type of unit is single family homes maintenance and are likely to
national trends over the past several (66.4%), followed by 22.5% multi- have components known to be
decades and can be attributed to family unit buildings. unsafe due to structure/product
smaller family sizes, increases in life make-up (e.g. lead pipes, lead
expectancy, and increases in single As of 2010, approximately 60% of paint and asbestos).
parent households. Village residents live in owner-
occupied housing with a vacancy • Between 1990-1999, the
As shown, the Village of Fox Crossing rate of 2.2%, as compared to 1.1% Village saw a fairly significant
may see an increase of 2,298 in year 2000. The 2011-2015 rolling increase in home construction.
households between 2010 and estimates suggests the homeowner This correlates to a 14%
Household Trends & Projections

Village of Fox Crossing Village of Harrison* Town of Grand Chute City of Neenah Winnebago County Wisconsin
Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons
Number Per Number Per Number Per Number Per Number Per Number Per
1990 5,351 2.61 1,059 3.02 5,465 2.65 9,024 2.57 53,216 2.64 2,055,774 2.38
2000 6,298 2.52 1,998 2.88 7,586 2.42 9,834 2.49 61,157 2.56 2,084,544 2.57
2010 7,948 2.33 3,644 1.58 9,378 2.23 10,694 2.38 67,875 2.46 2,279,768 2.49
2015 8,183 2.32 3,980 1.57 10,146 2.22 11,012 2.37 69,413 2.45 2,371,815 2.44
2020 8,710 2.30 4,675 1.56 11,198 2.21 11,505 2.36 72,687 2.44 2,491,982 2.41
2025 9,195 2.29 5,344 1.56 12,150 2.20 11,935 2.35 75,603 2.42 2,600,538 2.39
2030 9,653 2.28 6,040 1.55 13,081 2.19 12,321 2.34 78,242 2.41 2,697,884 2.36
2035 9,992 2.27 6,619 1.54 13,819 2.18 12,573 2.33 79,898 2.40 2,764,498 2.34
2040 10,246 2.26 7,075 1.53 14,356 2.16 12,682 2.31 80,895 2.39 2,764,498 2.35
* Incorporated in 2013.
**Forecasted years (2015-2040) assumes a 1.0% decline per decade (past decline ranged from approximately 0.3% to 8.0%, excluding State figures)

Housing Units Projections 2000-2040
Source: U.S. Census Bureau & MSA Projections
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
TOTAL UNITS
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Household Trends & Projections

Source : U.S. Census & MSA Projections
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Households: 5,351 6,298 7,948 8,710 9,653 10,246

Persons Per: 2.61 2.52 2.33 2.30 2.28 2.26
increase in population the healthy balance of rental units BUILDING PERMIT

Village saw during the same is around 5% allowing renters DATA
period. However, since 2010 options in the market and the
there has been limited new ability to move in immediately. The figures on page A-8 show
home construction within the regional building permit data from
Village. A major contributor to • The percentage of renter 2016. In 2016 Fox Crossing had
the lack of home construction occupied units in Fox Crossing a total of 102 permits issued. Of
can be attributed to the Great increased from 28% in 2000 these 14 were for commercial, 2
Recession, which has impacted to 35% in 2010. This reflects a for apartments, 41 for single-family
the entire nation since the late decrease in home ownership of residences, 5 for duplexes and 40 for
2000s. single-family houses, detached remodel/additions.
houses and condominiums. The
• The 2011-2015 rolling estimates 2011-2015 rolling estimates As compared to the average of the
suggest the rental vacancy suggest unit occupancy has not communities in the region, Fox
rate is holding around 3.1%. A changed much. Crossing was below the average
Unit Type, 2011-2015 Average* Year Structure Built, 2011-2015 Average*
Source : American Community Survey Source : American Community Survey
2.8% 1939 or earlier

31%
1940 to 1949
1950 to 1959
1960 to 1969
1970 to 1979
62%
1980 to 1989
4% 1990 to 1999
2000 to 2009
1, detached 1, attached 2 or More Mobile home 2010 or later
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

* error exceeds 10% for all estimates
* error exceeds 10% for all estimates
Unit Occupancy
Source: U.S. Census Bureau & American Community Survey

2000 2010 Avg. 2011-2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Owner Occupied 4,485 68.8% 5,018 60.0% 5,275 59.7%
Renter Occupied 1,813 27.8% 2,930 35.1% 2,919 33.1%
Vacant 223 3.4% 410 4.9% 636 7.2%
Homeowner Vacancy Rate 1.1% 2.2% 2.9%
Rental Vacancy Rate 5.5% 5.4% 3.1%
TOTAL 6,521 8,358 8,830
on number of commercial permits, Commercial/Industrial building commercial/industrial permits) were

apartments and remodels/additions. permits (both new and additional at 1,282 permits in 2004, decreased
Fox Crossing was above average on developments) were at 20 in 2004 and then spiked in 2010 to 1,849
total number of single-family and and then reached a low (2 new permits. Currently, other types of
duplex permits issued. developments) in 2009, but have building permits have decreased to
since increased to 14 total permits 890 permits in 2016.
Historical data from Fox Crossing (including new and additional
(see page A-9) shows that single- developments) in 2016.
family building permits were high
in 2004 (115), declined through the Other building permits (including
Great Recession/recovery and are re n o v a t i o n s a n d a ny t h i n g
now just starting to rise again. not included in residential or

Regional Building Permit Data, 2016
Source: 2016 Growth Report (City of Appleton, WI)
Single-Family Duplex
80 12
70 10
60
50 8
40 6
30 4
20
10 2
0 0
Number Average Number Average
Apartments Remodel/Additions
16 250
14
200
12
10 150
8
6 100
4 50
2
0 0
Number Average Number Average
Commercial
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Number Average
Fox Crossing Historical Building Permit Data, 2004-2016
Source: City of Fox Crossing
Residential
140
120
100
# of Units
80
60
40
20
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Single-Family Duplex Multi-Family
Commercial/Industrial
14
12
10
# of Units
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
New Comm/Ind Add'n Comm/Ind
Other Permits
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
# of Units
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Other Permits

Gross Rent as Percentage of Selected Monthly Owner
AFFORDABILITY & Income, Average 2011-2015 Costs, Average 2011-2015
VALUE Source: American Community Survey Source: American Community Survey

Affordable housing opportunities Percent Percent
are often provided through the sale Less than 20 percent 43.1% Less than 20 percent 45.6%
of older housing units. Housing is
20.0 to 24.9 percent 13.6% 20.0 to 24.9 percent 21.7%
generally considered “affordable”
when the owner or renter’s monthly 25.0 to 29.9 percent 7.8% 25.0 to 29.9 percent 11.6%
housing costs do not exceed 30% of 30.0 to 34.9 percent 4.3% 30.0 to 34.9 percent 4.8%
their gross monthly income. Based
on the rolling average between 35 percent or more 28.9% 35 percent or more 16.2%
2011-2015, roughly 21% of Village Not Computed 2.3% Not computed 0.0%
homeowners and 33% of renters
exceeded the “affordable” threshold.
While these numbers are important Gross Rent
indicators of affordability, it is Source: U.S. Census Bureau & American Community Survey
also important to note that some Avg.
residents may consciously choose 2000 2011 - 2015
to devote more than 30% of their
Less than $500 38.1% 8.2%
income to household and lifestyle
expenses, homeowners in particular. $500 to $999 56.3% 80.3%
$1,000 to $1,499 0.7% 9.1%
The median value of a home in the
$1,500 or more 1.3% 1.5%
Village is assumed to be around
$153,400 (based on the rolling No Cash Rent 3.6% 0.9%
average from 2011-2015), which is Median Rent $539 $708
lower than the Town of Grand Chute
($172,400) but is higher than the
City of Menasha ($118,400), City of
Neenah ($132,400) and the County's Value (For Homes with Mortgages)
($143,100) median home values. Source: U.S. Census Bureau & American Community Survey
Avg.
2000 2011 - 2015
Less than $50,000 2.2% 6.5%
$50,000 to $99,999 35.3% 8.2%
2011 - 2015 $100,000 to $149,999 40.9% 32.5%
Average Median $150,000 to $199,999 12.2% 26.6%
Value: $200,000 to $299,999 6.9% 17.6%
$153,400 $300,000 to $499,999 1.6% 6.5%
$500,000 or more 0.8% 2.1%
Median Value $112,100 $153,400
HOUSING PROGRAMS
percentage of their income toward heat. Applications usually must be
rent. Contact the local Rural and made through the county Energy
Public Housing: Public housing Economic Development office for Assistance Office. Payments are
programs provide publicly-owned details, which is generally located made based on a multi-tier schedule
and publicly-operated housing for at the county seat. depending on income, household
low-income families and individuals. size, and fuel type. One payment at
Local housing authorities set Rural & Economic Development the appropriate benefit rate is made
income limits, and rent may not Loans: Rural and Economic for the entire heating season.
exceed 30% of income. Contact Development “Section 502”
the Oshkosh/Winnebago County loans are available to rehabilitate Weatherization Pro grams:
Housing Authority for information. homes that fail to meet minimum Winnebago County’s Weatherization
standards for “decent, safe and program helps low-income
Section 8 Housing Subsidies: sanitary” housing, and to make households realize significant
The federal Depar tment of homes accessible to persons with savings in energy bills. Common
Housing and Urban Development disabilities. Contact the local Rural services include insulating attics
(HUD) contracts, either directly or and Economic Development office. and sidewalls, air-sealing the
through a local housing authority, structure, furnace inspections, and
with owners of new, existing or Home I mprovement Loan energy conservation measures
rehabilitated housing units. HUD Program: The Wisconsin Housing such as lighting and refrigerator
pays the difference between rent and Economic Development replacement. Call Energy Services
charged on the private market and Authority (WHEDA) administers the Inc. at 800-506-5596 for further
the tenant’s contribution, which is Home Improvement Loan Program information.
based on income. The participating (HILP) and the Home Energy Loan
owners may be public or private. Program (HELP). These programs are Home Rehabilitation Loans: In
Apartments, houses and rented designed to enable homeowners partnership with the Winnebago
mobile homes may be eligible. with low or moderate incomes to Homebuyer Program, the Brown
Another type of Section 8 program repair and improve their homes. County Planning and Land Services
provides a rent subsidy certificate The program makes FHA-insured Department administers a Home
to a qualified applicant who then home improvement loans available Rehab program in Winnebago
finds a landlord who is willing at an interest rate below the market County to income eligible
to participate. Sometimes it is rate. A third program, the Home homeowners. Focus is on repair
possible to obtain a subsidy for the Energy Incentive Program, is used of important structural and safety
tenant’s current dwelling. Contact with HILP for energy conservation needs, as well as code issues. Call
the Oshkosh/Winnebago County projects. To apply for a loan, visit a Brown County at 920-448-6485 for
Housing Authority for details. participating lending institution, or further information.
call 800-334-6873.
Rural Rent Assistance: In rural Downpayment Assistance: The
areas, the Rural and Economic Low-Income Energy Assistance Winnebago Homebuyer Program
Development office administers a Program: The Low-Income Energy provides financial assistance to
rent assistance program similar to Assistance Program provides energy make homeownership possible for
the Section 8 program. The rural assistance for low-income renters income eligible families. Assistance
program uses the same income and homeowners. Eligibility is is provided for closing costs and
guidelines to establish eligibility. limited to households that have downpayment assistance up to
The rent charged to the tenant is an income not greater than 150% $14,500. For more information on
generally limited to 30% of the of the poverty level, and that show the program contact the Winnebago
tenant’s income. Priority is given an “energy burden”. This means the County Homebuyer Program at
to tenants in program-sponsored household must directly pay a fuel 920-424-1450.
projects who are paying the highest provider or pay rent that includes

M OB IL I T Y & T R AN SP ORTATION
COMMUTING Commuting Time to Work, Average, 2011-2015

Source: American Community Survey
In general, the Village of Fox
Crossing’s workforce (16 years Village of Fox Crossing Winnebago County Wisconsin
25.0%
or older) is commuting shorter
distances than the workforce within
Winnebago County and the State 20.0%
as a whole. Below are a couple
notable differences between these 15.0%
geographies.
10.0%
• Approximately 43% of the
Village’s workforce commutes
outside of the County, which is 5.0%
less than the workforce within
the County. 0.0%
Less than 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 59 60 or
• Only 12% of the Village’s 10 minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes more
workforce commutes 30 or more minutes minutes
minutes to work, which is lower * error exceeds 10% for all estimates for Fox Crossing and
than the County’s workforce
(17%) and the State’s (27%).
Percentage of Residents Commuting, 2011-2015
Commuting in the Village of Fox Source: American Community Survey
Crossing is mostly done by car,
with 88.2% of commuters traveling Single Occupancy 88.2%
in a single occupant vehicle. This
number is higher than both the Carpooled 4.5%
County (85.5%) and the State as a
whole (80.6%). One difference in
commuting methods is by those Worked at Home 3.5%
who carpool with 4.5% of the
Village of Fox Crossing’s workforce Walked 1.5%
carpooling compared to 6.8% of
Winnebago County and 8.4% of the Bicycle 1.2%
State as a whole.
Other Means 1.0%
Public Transportation 0.1%
Place of Work, 2011-2015

Village of Fox Crossing Winnebago County
Within Winnebago County 56.4% 72.6%
Outside of County, Within State 43.3% 27.0%
Outside of State 0.3% 0.5%
MAJOR MODES OF Railroad Service: Canadian National immediately adjacent to, or within
TRAVEL Railroad operates two routes that run a few blocks of, the major and/or
through the Village of Fox Crossing. minor arterials in the Village. Within
Aviation Service: The Village of Fox Freight transfers and switching the region there are over 50 trucking
Crossing is served by the Appleton operations for Canadian National and 10 warehousing firms. Services
International Airport (formerly take place in rail yards located in include local and long distance motor
Outagamie County Regional Appleton, Menasha, Neenah and freight, contract and heavy hauling
Airport). It is located in the Town of Oshkosh. A north-south route and liquid or dry bulk trucking.
Greenville, just north of Fox Crossing. connects the Oshkosh Area with
The airport has significant land use Fond du Lac, Milwaukee and the Road Classifications: All federal,
implications because some of its Chicago Rail Yards to the south and state, county, and local roads are
landing patterns occur over the the northern segment connects classified into categories under the
Village. Accordingly, Fox Crossing Oshkosh to the Appleton/Fox Cities “Roadway Functional Classification
has adopted Outagamie County Area and Green Bay. An east-west System” based upon the type of
Regional Airport's Airport Overlay route connects the Neenah Yard service they provide (see map on
Zoning Ordinance. The airport has a with Stevens Point and Marshfield the next page). In general, roadways
8,002-foot and 6,501-foot concrete in central Wisconsin, as well as the with a higher functional classification
runway. Allegiant Air, American major railroad terminals located should be designed with limited
Airlines, Delta and United offer further west in the Twin Cities and access and higher speed traffic.
service at the airport. The airport is Duluth, MN.
owned by Outagamie County. Roadway Improvement Projects:
The nearest passenger service Wisconsin’s Six Year Highway
Winnebago County operates the (AMTRAK) station is located 75 miles Improvement Program identifies
nearby Wittman Regional Airport, southwest in Columbus. This stretch projects by county and project
located in the City of Oshkosh. The of rail is part of Amtrak’s Empire limits. This list provides projects to
airport is not served by commercial Builder Route, which is a major be completed between 2017 and
airlines, but provides aircraft rental east-west route that runs between 2022. The Village of Fox Crossing
and charter flights. The Wittman Chicago and the Pacific Northwest. will be impacted by one major
Regional Airport becomes the busiest project during this time frame:
airport in the world the last weekend Water Transit: There are no port the Tri-County project which will
in July when the Experimental facilities in the Village of Fox Crossing. reconstruct and expand US 10/WIS
Aircraft Association (EAA) holds its 441 from 4 lanes to six lanes and
annual Fly-In Convention. The airport Truck Routes: Trucking is used reconstruct five interchanges. The
has an 8,000-foot concrete runway extensively throughout the region Tri-County project is a major driver
that accomodates the larger aircraft because of the intermodal transfer of new economic development
that fly in for the EAA convention and options, including the Interstate in Fox Crossing as the lack of a full
a 6,000-foot concrete runway that is and National Highway network, interchange has historically limited
used for smaller aircraft take-off and Wisconsin River, freight rail and commercial development in the
landing. aviation facilities. Fox Crossing has area.
five major truck freight terminals.
Truck routes exist in Fox Crossing
Planned Road Improvements
Source: Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Hwy County Project Title/Limits Miles Year Project Description

10 Winnebago USH 10 - USH 10/STH 20.61 2017- USH and USH 10/STH 441 extending
441 (County CB - Oneida 2022 approximately 5 miles from CTH CB in
St) Winnebago County to Oneida Street in
Calumet County.

Existing Transportation Facilities Map
Ex
N CASALOMA DR
N MASON ST
N MC CARTHY RD
N WESTHILL BLVD
N PERKINS ST
N LYNNDALE DR
N
N MAYFLOWER DR
N DIVISION ST
AD
!
"
#
N LAWE ST
G
E ATLANTIC ST
41
ER
N RICHMOND ST
N LINW OOD AV
N MORRISON ST
N DREW ST
AV
N MEADE ST
Trans
W PACKARD ST
5,600 9,200 25,500

8,000 18,100 7,400
6,900 5,700 W FRANKLIN ST
8,300 Appleton W COLLEGE AV

2,300
E COLLEGE AV
Fa
Grand Chute
COLLEGE AV
Internati onal
S LAW E S T
W COLLEGE AV
Greenville
12,900 6,800
30,000 24,700
To w n o f
7,900
To w n o f
Ai rport 12,000 7,700
W LAWRENCE ST
ATE
R ST
"
SPENCER RD W
Z
E
I 13,500 W SPENCER ST
ST
1,800
S LYNNDALE DR
7,200 7,300 5,800 ER
AT
4,900
W
Compre
W ST
75,600 T AV E SOUTH RIV E R
3,500
ß
S
EC
CB
S ME MORIA L DR
S CASALOMA DR
O SP
ONE
20
PR
IDA ST
k
S BLU M ND DR
e
S PERKINS ST
M ud Cre
E FREMONT ST
W
7,700 4,900 W SEYMOUR ST City
4,600 7,600 10,800 18,900 6,300
of Appleton
Outagamie County WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
W PROSPECT AV W PROSPECT AVE
8,200 ST
S CARPENTER ST
W inneba go C ounty
r W CALUM E T
11,100 RD 10,500 ve
6,400 2,300 Ri
NORTHERN
6,500 ox
COLD SPRING RD
6,500
Existing
9,400
F
E TAFT AV
N LAWE ST
IC ST E ROELAND AV
4,100
Village of Fox C
VALLEY RD
10,100
N DREW ST
N MEADE ST
Transportation /
.
4,400
%
¾ 441 10
%
¾
441
Planning Area
7,100
E COLLEGE AV 18,700 4,400
Facilities
rts
9,500
S LAW E S T
2,100
B u t t t le L a k e
MIDWAY RD (COUNTY RD AP)
s Mo
E SHADY LN M IDW AY
13,700
County
E SHADY LN
D
R
9,000
CH R
1,300
STEAD DR

76,700 840
BEA
76 2,500
¾
% 8,000
e De 2,700 48,600
City of Appleto
Comprehensive Plan
ORTS
ST RD
/
.
E SOUTH RIV E R
9,900 4,200
Existing
15,100 6,800 NK
L it
N CASALOMA DR
N MASON ST
N WESTHILL BLVD
N PERKINS ST
10
AIRPORT RD A
7,200
N LYNNDALE DR
12,400 PL
SM
N
24,900
B
3,100
City of Menash
2018-2038
N DIVISION ST
AD
"
!
#
E DE
AMERICAN D R E ATLANTIC ST
N LAWE ST
1,700
G
3,200 15,900 2,300 2,700

T
41 910
ER
N RICHMOND ST
W ES
N LINW OOD AV
"
!
7,400
#
N MORRISON ST
BU TT
N DREW ST
EMONT ST
AV
8,400
/
. 41
EUGENE ST
N MEADE ST
Transportation
CLAYTON AVE
ST
W PACKARD ST
10
City 18,100 City of Neenah
4,500 660
IRISH RD
5,600 9,200 25,500
MELISSA
7,400 7,300 12,900
Appleton
6,900 5,700 2,200 W FRANKLIN ST
2,300
4,000 2,800 16,300
3,200 18,600 10,800 3,100
Village of Harri
D
20,500 CR
RD
JACOBSEN RD E COLLEGE AV
2,300 FAIRVIEW RDW
Facilities
O
OW
S LAW E S T
N
COLLEGE AV
12,900 9,500 11,200 2,500 NIT 3,000
LONDON ST
6,800
COLD SPRING RD
TO
30,000 24,700 3,400 MA
.
/
S CARPENTER ST
12,000 W LAWRENCE ST ST 5,200 114
LE
7,700 2,300
Village
TE R
WA
ß
PP
CB 2,300
Town
E SEVENTH ST
A
13,500 W SPENCER ST RD
of Harrison
ST 730 NK
0 PL
A
S LYNNDALE DR
E TAFT AV 7,200
MILWAUKEE ST
7,300 5,800 ER
RACINE ST
7,900
City of
AT
TAYCO ST
4,900
W
Comprehensive Plan
E ROELAND W ST
Waterbody
AV
Village of Fox Crossing Traffic CountEC Year Menasha
75,600 T AV E SOUTH RIV E R
0,100 3,500
S
87,800
Ca lu m et Cou nty
S ME MORIA L DR
S CASALOMA DR
O SP
ONE
THIRD ST
2018-2038
PR
9,600
2010
IDA ST
k
5,400
S BLU M ND DR
e
%
¾441
Functional Classificat
S PERKINS ST
M ud Cre
E FREMONT ST
W
Planning Area 2,500 8,200 BROAD ST

9,100 4,700 3,400 Mena sha Chan nel
City
4,900 4,400
2012 ßII
W SEYMOUR ST
9,500
W IN CHESTER RD
M IDW AY 18,900 A rr 6,300

of Appleton 4,400
Principal Arteri
0,800 ow
hCounty 2,700 3,600 KEYES ST
2013
WILLOW LN
NAYMUT ST
D
R
ß Minor Arterial
PROSPECT AVE
5,400
W
ea
ST
N LA KE
2,700 O
8,200 ST 8,700 AIP
S CARPENTER ST
d R
To w n o f
r
Clayton
W CALUM E T
11,100 RD
i 10,500 ve AH
N
0 v er Ri 2014
3,100
City
6,500 of Appleton o
NICOLET BLVD
Collector
NORTHERN
ST
Existing Village of FoxExisting

x 80,700
N CASALOMA DR
RD 6,500
N MASON ST
N MASON ST
N WESTHILL BLVD
N PERKINS ST
N PERKINS ST
N LYNNDALE DR
N LYNNDALE DR
NK
9TH ST
9,400
N
A
F
PL
%
¾ 76
1ST ST
B
NORTH ST
T
3RD ST
N DIVISION ST
N DIVISION ST
AD
AD
E TAFT AV
2015
!
"
#
LS
City of
N LAWE ST
N LAWE ST
City of Menasha
G
E ATLANTIC ST E ATLANTIC ST
Local
C IA
41
ER
ER
N RICHMOND ST
N RICHMOND ST
N LINW OOD AV
N LINW OOD AV
E ROELAND AV
N MORRISON ST
N MORRISON ST
Traffic Count Year

N DREW ST
N DREW ST
MAIN ST
4,100
Crossing
AV
AV
ER
E FOREST AVE
Neenah
VALLEY RD
N MEADE ST
N MEADE ST
Transportation Transportation
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) 10,100
MM
W PACKARD ST W PACKARD ST
S GREEN BAY RD
4,400
City of Neenah
CO
9,200 25,500 6,100

S LAKE ST
"
5,600
18,100 7,400
Z
I /
.
N
2010
4,400 ST
12,9006,900
5,700 5,700 W FRANKLIN
%
¾ 441
Airport W FRANKLIN ST
%
¾ 10
441
5,400 Lake Annual Averag
HARRISON ST
100
Planning Area
E
Village of Harrison
E COLLEGE AV LARSEN RD E COLLEGE AV W
2,300 2,300
Facilities County Facilities 2013

18,700W 4,400
IS
CO Winnebago
S LAW E S T
S LAW E S T
W COLLEGE AV COLLEGE AV
2012
rts
12,900 6,800 9,500

NS
700 12,000 30,000 24,700
W LAWRENCE ST ST W LAWRENCE ST
5,400 ST WA IN
Data Sources:
7,700 7,700 TE R TE R 4,000 S AV
E
BWuPtRtOSP t le L a k e
HIN
MIDWAY WARD (COUNTY RD AP) WA
TULLAR RD
s Mo
M IDW AY
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago,
Village
AVE
E E GT
13,500
OAK ST
LN
PENCER ST W SPENCER ST 13,700 NNE ON
Town
D
D CO and Outagamie Counties.

R
ST ST 9,000
h
CH R
AV
1,800 1,300 NE
f Harrison
ug
E
S LYNNDALE DR
S LYNNDALE DR
STEAD DR
0 7,200 7,300 5,800 ER ER W IN Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Cal

840
S lo
AT
AT
ß
76,700
W
BEA
S PARK AVE
CB Outagamie Counties.
e De
4,900
W
2014
Comprehensive Plan
City ofComprehensive Plan
2,700 48,600
W ST D W ST
CONGRESS ST
Functional Classification: WisDOT F

Appleton
ER E R
ORTS
75,600 T AV TVAV
E SOUTH RI E SOUTH RIVDE R
ah
3,500
Waterbody
S
EC EC ID G R
15,100 6,800
/
. Classification map for the Urbanize
K
L it
KR 8,700 AN
S ME MORIA L DR
S ME MORIA L DR
S CASALOMA DR
O SP
10
AIRPORT RD
ONE
ONE
en
7,200 PL
SM
OA of Appleton (08/11/2016)
2018-2038 2018-2038 2015

3,100
PR
Ne
City of Menasha
IDA ST
IDA ST
ek
E DE
Annual Average Daily Traffic Coun

S BLU M ND DR
2,700
S PERKINS ST
S PERKINS ST
S COMMERCIAL ST
M ud Cre
E FREMONT ST 910 E FREMONT ST

W
WiSDOT (2010 to 2015)
!
"
# Functional Classification
BU TT
8,400
41 City City
EUGENE ST W CECIL ST E CECIL ST
ST
4,900
BA
City of Neenah
4,500
ß
"
W SEYMOUR ST
660 W SEYMOUR ST
JJ
Z
YV
I
MELISSA
6,300
Principal Arterial of Appleton of 12,900
Appleton Airport
IE
18,900
W
10,800
2,800 16,300
18,600 10,800 RD 3,100 Village of Harrison
RD
20,500 AVE
RD
VE W PROSPECT
OC
OW
Minor Arterial 5,200
N
2,500 8,200Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_ExistingTransportationFacilities.mxd

CrALUM8,200
ST 3,000 W CALUM E T S T
S CARPENTER ST
S CARPENTER ST
NIT
er
LONDON ST
TO
/
.
We ET MA
11,100
iv RD 10,500 iv 114
LE
2,300
Village
R R
PP
NORTHERN
ox 2,300 6,500 ox
6,500
Town
SEVENTH ST
A
Collector
RD
9,400
of Harrison
K
F
AN
PLAV
E TAFT E TAFT AV
MILWAUKEE ST
RACINE ST
City of RD P)
TAYCO ST
Local
E ROELAND AV E ROELAND AV
TrafficWaterbody
Count
VillageYear Traffic Count Year
4,100 4,100
Village of Fox10,100
Crossing of Fox Crossing
VALLEVALLEY
Y RD VALLEY RD
10,100 RD P)
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD (COUNTY

87,800 Menasha
Ca lu m et Cou nty
/
. /
.
THIRD ST
2010 2010
4,400 4,400
00 %
¾ 441
%
¾
Annual Average Daily Traffic Count
441
10
%
¾
441
10
%
¾ 441
100
18,700
BROAD ST
4,400 18,700 4,400 Planning Area Planning
Functional Area
Classification
,700 3,400 Mena sha Chan nel
2012 2012
rts
9,500 9,500
TER RD
Data Sources:
Principal Arterial
B u t t t le L a k e
MIDWAY RD (COUNTY RD AP) MIDWAY RD (COUNTY

s Mo
RD AP)
M IDW AY M IDW AY
13,700 Calumet
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago,
4,400 13,700
County County
2013 2013
ADY LN
D
00 D D
R
9,000 9,000
CH R
KEYES ST
1,300
WILLOW LN

NAYMUT ST
STEAD DR
STEAD DR
Minor Arterial
ST 840 840
N LA KE
Street Centerlines:
76,700 Winnebago, Calumet and
BEA
0 AIP
e De
48,600 Outagamie Counties. 48,600

Winnebago County, WIK RD 2014 2014
N
00 A2,700
City of Appleton City of Appleton
H
ORTS
RD
Functional Classification: WisDOT Function
/
. /
.
NICOLET BLVD
Collector
ST
15,100 6,800 NK
L it
N
10 Area10
AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD A A
7,200
Classification map for the Urbanized PL PL
9TH ST
SM
2015 2015
1ST ST
0 3,100
T
3RD ST
of Appleton (08/11/2016)
City of Menasha City of Menasha
LS
E DE
2,700 Annual Average Daily Traffic Count: City of

2,700
Local
C IA
910 910
"
!
#
BU TT
AIN ST
ER
E FOREST AVE
WiSDOT (2010 to 2015)
8,400
41 Neenah
EUGENE ST EUGENE ST
ST
ST
MM
City of Neenah City of Neenah

4,500
" "
660 660
Z Z
CO
S LAKE ST
I I
MELISSA
MELISSA
12,900 12,900 Airport Airport

N
,000 2,800 16,300 0 0.35 0.7 Miles Lake Annual Average Daily Traffic Count
HARRISON ST
100
18,600 10,800 18,600 10,800
Village of Harrison Village of Harrison
E RD 3,100 3,100
D
0 20,500 CR
RD
RD
W
IS OC
CO OW Winnebago
WO
N
3,000 ITO 3,000

2,500 NIT
LONDON ST
LONDON ST
NS
TO
TO
.
/ .
/
MA AN
114Print Date: 6/6/2018
IN M
5,200 5,200
WA
114 Data Sources:
LE
LE
00 AV
Village Village
S HIN E
PP
PP
2,300 Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet

Town Town
EVENTH ST AVE GT SEVENTH ST
A
A
OAK ST
NNE ON RD KR
D
of HarrisonPL of Harrison
730
CO NK
gh
NE
AV A AN
E PL
MILWAUKEE ST
ST
W IN Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and

RACINE ST
RACINE ST
lou
City of
W
S PARK AVE
MILWAUKEE
TAYCO ST
Outagamie Counties.
Waterbody Waterbody
CONGRESS ST
Functional Classification: WisDOT Function

in n eb a g o C o u n t y
87,800 Menasha Classification map for the Urbanized Area

Ca l u m e t C o u n t y
Ca l u m e t C o u n t y
THIRD ST THIRD ST
of Appleton (08/11/2016)
9,600
A-14 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o Functional
ssing | Comprehensive Plan
Classification Functional Classification
Annual Average Daily Traffic Count:
COMMERCIAL ST
ROAD ST BROAD ST
WiSDOT (2010 to 2015)
4,700 Mena3,400
shaSTChan nel
W CECIL E CECIL ST Mena sha Chan nel
BA
HESTER RD
Principal Arterial Principal Arterial

YV
IE
4,400 0 0.35 0.7 Miles

W
3,600 KEYES ST KEYES ST

WILLOWSLN
WILLOW LN
NAYMUT ST
NAYMUT ST
RD
Minor Arterial Minor Arterial

ST ST
N LA KE
8,700
N
AIP
N
AIP Print Date: 6/6/2018
AH AH
NICOLET BLVD NICOLET BLVD
ST
BIKE, PEDESTRIAN & Transit service hours are Monday The Aging and Disability Resource
TRANSIT - Friday 6:15 AM - 10:30 PM and Center of Winnebago County also
Saturday 8:15 AM - 10:30 PM. offers local and long distance
Sidewalks, Trails, & Routes: The transportation for clients of
Village lacks sidewalks in most One-way fares are $2 for adults, Winnebago County Department
areas and has tried to address this $1 for seniors and those with of Human Services, or non-clients
issue through the development disabilities, and $0.75 for youth. Bus ages sixty and over. This program is
of multi-use trails. The Village has passes are also available. A 30 day staffed by volunteers.
approximately 20 miles of trails. pass is $60 for adults, $40 for seniors
The backbone of the trail system and those with disabilities, and $22 The nearest regional bus stops are
is the "Fox Cities Trestle-Friendship for youth. L
I located in Appleton and Oshkosh. A
47
Trail" which will ultimately connect @
A Both cities are served by Lamers
L
I and E
UU
Manitowoc, WI with Stevens Point, In addition to the paratransit Greyhound. L
I L
I O
MM
WI. Additional trails are located
L
I services offered by Valley Transit, O
L
I Center
along American Drive, West Northern Winnebago Dial-a-Ride Freedom
L
I N
American Drive, CTH II, Cold Spring Ellington offers reduced fare taxi service 55
Road, CTH CB, Shady Lane/Michel's
Hortonville for individuals sixty and over. This L
I @
A EE
15
@ Jacbosen Road, and North Lake
A
Way, service is provided through Fox
L
I JJ
Street. Valley Cab.

@
A 15
L
I JJ JJ
L
I Vandenbroek
Fox Crossing has approximately Grand
76
three miles of on-road bike routes. @
A Appleton TMA: Existing, Planned Chute & Recommended Bicycle Facilities Map I CC
L
Bike routes are located along Valley Source: Appleton (Fox Cities) Transportation Management Area - Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2014)
41
Road, Manitowoc Road and North J
I
L
I A
Lake Street. The WisDOT Wisconsin Little OO
L
I L
I 15 OO OO
Bicycle Map to the right shows Greenville @
A L
I Chute
96
@
A 41
existing trails as well the suitability J
I Appleton GV
I M
Lof major roads for bicycling. L
I Ka AA
L
I 96
@
A 96
@
A Kimberly
L
I CB
441
@
A
Transit Service: Valley Transit L I
I L L
I @
A
Combined
Locks CA CA CA 125
L
I CE
provides fixed-route service and
N
specialized transit services for those L
I
with disabilities in Fox Crossing and County
Outagamie L
I KK
LI
I L BB BB 41
throughout the Fox Cities. Route 41 J
I
provides service on the west side@ of
Winnebago
A
County
L
I
@
A L
I 76
L
I
@
A
Map 23 A
47
E
U
441
Appleton TMA AP
M
Little Lake Butte des Mortes, and a
MM Menasha L
I
L
I
L
I L
I O
P
UU
L
I
orts
L
I
number of routes provide service
L
I O
Harrison
Existing, Planned, & Center
10
Freedom
J
I N
sM
Ellington L
I
Recommended 55
47
J
Kaukauna
on the East@ side of Little Lake Butte

L
I
J
I
@
A
@
A L
I
JIJ
I 10 CB
EE
10 10 41
55
e de
J
I @I
A
Hortonville
L
I 10
15
A
JJ
J
I Bicycle Facilities J 41
des Mortes. RouteA@ 41 runs from the
L
I
10
15 @I
A J Harrison 96
e Butt
10
L
I JJ
JJ JJ
City of Neenah
J
I Transit Center to the
L
I L
I Vandenbroek
Grand
114
76
LA
@ Existing Bicycle Facility (See Map 17 for detail)
@
A I Chute CC
Fox River Mall. This route connects

Lak
Menasha
41 OO
II Planned Facility
J
I L
I L
I ZZ
II
L
I
r
Lthrough the City of Neenah to the

Little
ive
I L
I
xR
Recommended Facility
OO GG
Little
@IL L
I L
I L
I 15 OO OO
Fo
A Greenville Chute
Clayton 96
City of Oshkosh. The east side routes

@
A 41
J
I Appleton
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Network
GV
L
I M L
I Kaukauna AA Z
L
I L
I 96
@
A
connect to the City of Appleton
96
@
A CB
Kimberly
Parks
L
I 441
Buchanan
@
A
41
Combined
Transit Center, which connects to

L I
I L L
I @
A J
I L
I
CA
L
I CA CA 125
CE
Locks
CE
City
L
I N
Sherwoo
cities throughout the Outagamie
United LStates I Neenah Village
Outagamie County
T
County L
I KK
L
I LI
I J BB BB
Calumet County Lake 41
Appleton Transportation Management Area (TMA)

through regional bus service. Valley
! !
Winnebago County
!
76 441
@
A @
A Winnebago AP
JJ
L
I
!
! ! !
Menasha
L
I M
L
I
L
I P
orts
Harrison
10
J
I
des M
10 47 10
10 CB I
J @
A J
I 55
I
J L
I A
@ 10 10
41 J
I J
I
41
J
I 10
J
I
J
I
Harrison
Butte
10
J
I
114
@
A
Lake
II
II
L
I Menasha Woodville
Little
L
I
Clayton Appendix A | Community Indicators Report A-15
A
L
I
G
41
J
I
L
I
Neenah
Sherwood Source:
Base data provided by Calumet, Outagamie, & Winnebago County.
T
L
I Lake TMA data provided by ECWRPC & WisDOT.
Winnebago Bicycle Facility data provided by ECWRPC & local municipalities.
G
JJ
L
I L
I
Neenah
EC ON OMI C P R O SP E RITY
EDUCATION AND to outpace the County and State 2000 to present with the Village of
INCOME in having at least a high school Fox Crossing increasing from 4.4%
diploma. The percentage of people to 8.1% (an 84% increase). This
Educational attainment can provide county-wide (19%) and statewide change was slightly higher than the
valuable insight into the existing (18%) with a bachelor's degree rate of change for the County (79%)
labor force, including availability of has caught up to or surpassed Fox and much higher than the rate of
skilled and professional workers and Crossing (18%). change for the State (49%).
demand for training opportunities.
N
In the year 2000, approximately 88% In 2000, the Village of Fox Crossing’s
of Village of Fox Crossing residents per capita, median family and ote: The Census Bureau
25 years or older had at least a high household income levels were uses a set of income
school diploma, which is higher than higher than the County and State’s thresholds that vary by family size
Winnebago County (86%) and the income levels. More recent data and composition to detect who
State as a whole (85%). Looking at from the American Community is “poor”. If the total income for
higher education, 18% of residents Survey (ACS) suggests that the a family or unrelated individual
obtained a bachelor's degree which Village has continued to outpace falls below the relevant poverty
is higher than the County (16%) and the County and the State in these threshold, then the family or
the State (15%). More recent data two income indicators. The ACS unrelated individual is classified
from the American Community data also suggests the number of as being “below the poverty level”.
Survey (2010-2014) suggests that persons below the poverty level has
Village residents have continued increased in all geographies from
Educational Attainment, 2011-2015 Income Trends

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey
High School 34.7% 2000 Avg. 2011-

2015
Village of Fox
Some College 18.9%

Crossing
Per Capita $24,393 $32,809

Associate’s Degree 12.6% Median Family $60,097 $73,212
Median Household $50,887 $56,319
Bachelor’s Degree 18.3% Below Poverty 4.4% 8.1%
Graduate / Professional Degree 9.0% Per Capita $21,706 $27,770
Winnebago
County
Median Family $53,932 $67,477

High School or Higher 93.6% Median Household $44,445 $52,018
Below Poverty 6.7% 12.0%
Per Capita $21,271 $28,340
Wisconsin
Median Family $52,911 $68,064

Median Household $43,791 $53,357
Below Poverty 8.7% 13.0%
EXISTING LABOR FORCE actual unemployment rate for are considered in and “Sales
the Village is likely less than and Office”; and 21% are in
Based on the tables and graphs 4.8%. "Production, Transportation and
below, the following can be inferred Material Moving" occupations.
regarding the Village’s existing labor • According to the 2016 Leading The “Service” occupation is lower
force: Indicators for Excellence (LIFE) in the Village of Fox Crossing
report completed for the region, (14.9%) than the County (17.6%)
• Based on the American the 2014 unemployment rate for and the State (17.0%).
Community Survey (avg. the region was 4.81% compared
2011-2015), the Village of Fox with 5.51% statewide. • The largest occupations by
Crossing’s unemployment rate industry in the Village are
(4.8%) is similar to the County • A majority (86.6%) of workers in “Manufacturing”; “Educational
(4.7%) and lower than the State’s the Village of Fox Crossing earn a Services, and Health Care
(6.3%). Unemployment rates private wage and salary, slightly and Social Assistance”; and
are nearing pre-Great Recession higher than the County at 84.9% “Retail Trade”. Those in the
rates in the year 2000. According and the State at 82.3%. “Manufacturing” category make
to the Wisconsin Department of up 26.3% of the Village, which
Workforce Development, as of • Approximately one-third is similar to the County (25.0%)
March 2017, the unemployment (32%) of the population in and higher than the State
rate in Wisconsin has fallen to Fox Crossing is considered in (18.5%). This is consistent with
3.7% and 3.1% in Winnebago “Management, Professional expectations given the region
County. Therefore, the 2017 & Related” occupations; 25% is recognized as one of the top
manufacturing centers in the
Employment Status country.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, WI
Workforce and Labor Market Information System
N
Village of Fox Winnebago
Wisconsin
Crossing County ote: A
In Labor Force (2000) 9,071 85,820 2,869,236 c om mu n it y ’s
labor force includes all
Unemployment Rate 3.1% 3.7% 3.2% people over the age of 16
In Labor Force (avg. 2011-15) 10,535 90,212 3,077,153 classified as employed
or unemployed as well
Unemployment Rate 4.8% 4.7% 6.3%
as members of the U.S.
Armed Forces. Those
not included in the
Class of Worker, 2011-2015 labor force statistics
Source: American Community Survey i n clu d e s tu d e nt s ,
Village of Fox Winnebago homemakers, retired
Wisconsin workers, s eas onal
Crossing County
Private Wage & Salary 86.6% 84.9% 82.3% workers not currently
looking for work,
Government Worker 9.8% 11.4% 12.4% institutionalized
Self-employed & Not-for-Profit Worker 3.7% 3.6% 5.1% people, and those doing
Unpaid family Worker 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%
only incidental unpaid
family work.

MANUFACTURING Employment by Occupation, 2011-2015 Average
According to the Fox Cities Regional
Pa r t n e r s h i p, m a n u f a c t u r i n g Management, 32.0%
Professionals & Related
comprises 21.2% of the region's
employment and provides 46,634 25.0%
jobs. Over the next ten years, the Sales & Office
region is expected to gain 10,284
manufacturing jobs. 20.6%
Production, Transportation
& Material Moving
The overall location quotient (LQ)
for manufacturing in the Fox Cities 14.9%
Service
is 25.2 meaning that manufacturing
jobs are approximately 25 times
more concentrated in the region than Natural Resources 7.5%
average. This higher LQ indicates that & Construction
manufacturing is an export industry
which brings money into the region Employment by Industry, 2011-2015 Average
rather than simply circulating Source: American Community Survey
money already in the region. LQs for Village of Fox Crossing Winnebago County Wisconsin
particular types of manufacturing Public administration
within the Fox Cities are as follow:
Other Services
• Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet
Manufacturing (LQ=116) Arts, Entertainment
• Sawmill, Woodworking, and Education, Health, Social

Paper Machinery Manufacturing
(LQ=50) Prof, Scientific, Admin
Real Estate, Finance

• Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing
(LQ=48) Information
Transp, Warehousing, Utilities
Retail Trade
Wholesale Trade
Manufacturing
Construction
Ag/Forestry/Mining
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

* error exceeds 10% for all estimates for Fox Crossing and Ag/Forestry/Mining;
Wholesale Trade; Transp, Warehousing, Utilities; Information; RealEstate, Finance;
Other Services; and Public Administration for Winnebago County
LABOR PROJECTIONS Sonographers” (41% increase) A Leading Indicators for Excellence
and “Physician Assistants” (36.9% (LIFE) Study was completed for the
Based on Wisconsin’s Department increase). Note that highest growth Fox Cities in 2016. This study provides
of Workforce Development (WI does not translate to greatest a data-focused overview of quality
DWD), the projected fastest number of jobs. of life in the Fox Cities. This report
growing industries in Winnebago discusses manufacturing industry
County between 2012 and 2022 are MAJOR EMPLOYERS trends and states that between
“Construction” and “Professional & 2004 and 2014 the manufacturing
Business Services”. The “Health The top ten regional employers in industry saw an overall reduction
Services” industry in general is Fox Crossing are shown in the table in number of jobs. This was similar
growing rapidly, both regionally and below. to statewide and national trends.
statewide due in part to the aging Since manufacturing jobs still make
population. The only industry that is According to the Fox Cities Regional up a large number of jobs in the
projected to decline in Winnebago Partnership, the region has a total Fox CIties, this indicates that the
County is “Information". of 9,915 businesses. In 2016 the manufacturing jobs are reliant on
leading employment industries in large employers.
For the entire State of Wisconsin, the metro area were retail (33,280
the WI DWD estimates the following jobs); health care and social services
will be the top three high-growth (31,242 jobs); manufacturing
occupations between 2012-2022: (18,361 jobs); and banking, finance
“Interpreters and Translators” (44.3% and insurance (15,663 jobs).
increase), “Diagnostic Medical
Fastest Growing Industries in Winnebago County Top Regional Employers Located in Fox Crossing
Source: WI DWD, Bureau Workforce Training, QCEW, 2015 http://www.foxcitiesregion.com/major-employers/
Projected
2012 %
Industry 2022 # of
Employment Change Establishment Service or Product
Employment Employees
Construction 13,976 16,736 20% Consumer paper
Kimberly-Clark Corp. 3,200
Professional & products
25,256 29,584 17%
Business Services Electrical
Faith Technologies 1,700
Education & Health contractors
39,768 45,668 15%
Services Fire truck
Pierce Manufacturing 1,500
Leisure & Hospitality 25,856 28,361 10% manufacturing
Natural Resources 2,251 2,442 8% SCA Tissue Paper products 1,000
Financial Activities 13,177 14,204 8% Miron Construction Construction 1,000
Other Services 9,333 10,023 7% Printing &

RR Donnelly 1,000
packaging
Public Administration 16,425 17,325 5%
Clearwater Paper Paper products 500
Trade, Transportation
51,266 53,891 5% Outlook Graphics Printing & mailing 480
& Utilities
Manufacturing 65,617 67,889 3% Warehouse
Storage 350
Specialists
Self-Employed &
17,091 17,406 2% Spiral paper core
Unpaid Family Workers Sonoco Products 160
manufacturing
Information 4,619 4,170 -10%

MARKET ANALYSIS stores, department stores, gas within the Village: grocery store, gas
stations, grocery stores, health and station, bank, hair salon, clothing
In 2011 the Village completed a personal care stores and limited- store, bakery, hardware store, sit-
market analysis in order to better service eating establishments. down restaurants and a pizzeria.
understand its economic structure. Grocery store was the development
The study concentrated on a In addition to this quantitative most desired by survey respondents.
one-mile trade area around the analysis, the market analysis also
intersection of USH 10 and County included qualitative analysis in the The results of the market analysis
Road CB (the Town of Menasha form of a consumer survey. The combined with the survey results
Commercial Center, or TMCC).The survey revealed residents head to confirmed there is demand for retail
study used Ersi's Business Analyst surrounding cities for their retail and restaurants in Fox Crossing.
online to prepare a retail Retail
market MarketPlace
and serviceProfileneeds because there
place profile analysis which revealed
Village is Commercial
of Fox Crossing little retail
Centerdevelopment within In 2017, PreparedEsri by Business
Esri Analyst
CR-CB N, Menasha, Town of, Wisconsin, 54956 Latitude: 44.21855
the following sectors have retail
Ring: 1 mile radius
Fox Crossing and there are many OnlineLongitude:
shows-88.49495
similar retail gaps
gaps of over one million dollars surrounding facilities that have a as compared to the 2011 market
Summary Demographics
not2016
being met within the Village:
Population heavy draw on consumers, such analysis (see table 3,227 on the right):
electronics and appliance stores,
2016 Households as the Fox River Mall. The survey auto dealers, 1,407 furniture stores,
2016 Median Disposable Income $52,008
building material
2016 Per Capita Income and supplies identified demand for the following electronics and appliance stores,
$37,395
Industry Summary
NAICS Demand
(Retail Potential)
Supply
(Retail Sales)
Retail Gap building
Leakage/Surplus
Factor
materials
Number of
Businesses
and supplies
Fox Crossing 2017 Retail Market44-45,722
Place Profile
Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink $65,677,906 $21,339,614 $44,338,292 dealers,
51.0 grocery13 stores, health
Total Retail Trade
Source: Esri Business Analyst Online
Total Food & Drink
44-45
722
$59,441,662
$6,236,244
$18,222,484
$3,117,130
$41,219,178
$3,119,114
and 53.1
33.3
personal care 8
5
stores, gas
NAICS Demand Supply Retail Gap stations, clothing
Leakage/Surplus Number ofstores, sporting
Industry Group
Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 441
(Retail Potential)
$13,904,272
(Retail Sales)
$1,569,218 $12,335,054
goods/
Factor
79.7
hobby/musical
Businesses
2
instrument
Automobile Dealers 4411 $11,273,758 $0 $11,273,758 stores,
100.0 department 0 stores, other
Other Motor Vehicle Dealers
Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores
4412
4413
$1,778,121
$852,394
$599,112
$970,106
$1,179,009
-$117,712
generalized
49.6
-6.5
merchandise
1
1
stores,
Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores 442 $1,754,923 $0 $1,754,923 electronic
100.0 shopping 0 and mail-order
Furniture Stores
Home Furnishings Stores
4421
4422
$1,094,011
$660,912
$0
$0
$1,094,011
$660,912
houses,
100.0
100.0
and restaurants.0
0
Electronics & Appliance Stores 443 $3,083,832 $0 $3,083,832 100.0 0
Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores
Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers
444
4441
$3,571,572
$3,158,387
$955,018
$0
$2,616,554
$3,158,387
With some of these industries,
57.8
100.0
2
0
Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores 4442 $413,185 $880,548 -$467,363 such as auto dealers, furniture
-36.1 2
Food & Beverage Stores
Grocery Stores
445
4451
$9,718,059
$8,317,033
$2,751,423
$2,751,423
$6,966,636
$5,565,610
stores, electronics and appliance
55.9
50.3
1
1
Specialty Food Stores 4452 $928,303 $0 $928,303 stores, department stores, etc.,
100.0 0
Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores 4453 $472,723 $0 $472,723 100.0 0
Health & Personal Care Stores 446,4461 $3,440,091 $0 $3,440,091
consumers will typically travel a
100.0 0
Gasoline Stations 447,4471 $4,350,030 $0 $4,350,030 greater distance for brand loyalty
100.0 0
Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 448 $2,315,547 $0 $2,315,547 100.0 0
Clothing Stores 4481 $1,526,556 $0 $1,526,556 or to comparison shop. Therefore,
100.0 0
Shoe Stores 4482 $313,461 $0 $313,461 these types of industries may
100.0 0
Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores 4483 $475,530 $0 $475,530 100.0 0
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores 451 $1,419,029 $0 $1,419,029 not be as viable in Fox Crossing if
100.0 0
Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores 4511 $1,177,506 $0 $1,177,506 these stores already exist within
100.0 0
Book, Periodical & Music Stores 4512 $241,523 $0 $241,523 100.0 0
General Merchandise Stores 452 $11,464,340 $142,795 $11,321,545 the region. Overall, findings from
97.5 1
Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.
Other General Merchandise Stores
4521
4529
$9,098,461
$2,365,878 $142,795
$0 $9,098,461
$2,223,083
the retail market place profile are
100.0
88.6
0
1
Miscellaneous Store Retailers 453 $2,522,974 $2,430,768 $92,206 consistent with recommendations
1.9 1
Florists
Office Supplies, Stationery & Gift Stores
4531
4532
$105,940
$509,233
$0
$0
$105,940
$509,233
from the 2011 market analysis that
100.0
100.0
0
0
Used Merchandise Stores 4533 $471,943 $0 $471,943 there is additional demand for retail
100.0 0
Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers
Nonstore Retailers
4539
454
$1,435,857
$1,896,993
$1,194,702
$0
$241,155
$1,896,993
and restaurants in Fox Crossing.
9.2
100.0
1
0
Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses 4541 $1,471,172 $0 $1,471,172 100.0 0
Vending Machine Operators 4542 $149,172 $0 $149,172 100.0 0
Direct Selling Establishments 4543 $276,649 $0 $276,649 100.0 0
Food Services & Drinking Places 722 $6,236,244 $3,117,130 $3,119,114 33.3 5
Special Food Services 7223 $151,162 $0 $151,162 100.0 0
Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages 7224 $439,279 $886,708 -$447,429 -33.7 1
Restaurants/Other Eating Places 7225 $5,645,803 $2,230,421 $3,415,382 43 4
Data Note: Supply (retail sales) estimates sales to consumers by establishments. Sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amount
spent by consumers at retail establishments. Supply and demand estimates are in current dollars. The Leakage/Surplus Factor presents a snapshot of retail opportunity. This
is a measure of the relationship between supply and demand that ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents 'leakage' of retail
opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. The Retail Gap
represents the difference between Retail Potential and Retail Sales. Esri uses the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) to classify businesses by their
primary type of economic activity. Retail establishments are classified into 27 industry groups in the Retail Trade sector, as well as four industry groups within the Food
Services & Drinking Establishments subsector. For more information on the Retail MarketPlace data, please click the link below to view the Methodology Statement.
http://www.esri.com/data/esri_data/methodology-statements
Economic Prosperity Map
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
N
BA
DG
ER
N MEADE ST
E
N DREW ST
AV
W PACKARD ST
N
MALL
DR
P
W COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV
S LAWE S T
W SPENCER ST W SPENCER ST
G rand C hute
ß "
!
#
S LYNNDALE DR
CB
Greenville
S ON
41
Town of
To w n o f
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Com
E
S CASALOMA DR
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
IDA
City of
T
EC
S MEMORIA L DR
ST
ek
P
Appleton
OS
re
PR
E FREMONT ST
Mud C
er
v
Ri
Outagamie County Fox
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W P ROSPECT AVE
NORTHERN RD
N MEADE ST
Economic
N DREW ST
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
IRISH RD

Village
Prosperity
N DR
#3
/
.
S LAWE S T
10
%
¾
441
%
¾ 441
Plannin
H RD
EA C
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
E SHADY LN
County
Mor es
Comprehensive Plan
RE

MOR
EID
E SOUTH RIVER ST
S HO
e D
ts
A
ES
KE
ST
2018-2038
STEAD DR
ED
L it t le
LA
City of
B UTT
E FREMONT ST
W EST AMERICAN DR
A IR
City of
PO
N MASON ST
RT
N DIVISION ST
#1
N
RD
BA
RD
.
/
DG
ST
10
City of
ER
N
TO
N MEADE ST
MELISSA
41 Economic
N DREW ST
AV
LE
W PACKARD ST
P
#2
AP
NINTH ST
Village
"
!
#
N
LONDON ST
MALL FAIRVIEW RD JACOBSEN RD
D
O CR
DR
Prosperity
MILWAUKEE ST /
.
W COLLEGE AV W
TO
W COLLEGE AV NI
114
IRISH RD
Village
MA
Town
S LAWE S T

SEVENTH ST
of Harrison
TAYCO ST
RD
R
W SPENCER ST W SPENCER ST RACINE ST

D
NK
City of
N
A
PL
A
IC
"
!
#
S LYNNDALE DR
%
¾ 441 E
R
Parcel
D
41 Planning Area
M
L ERS R
Menasha
S ON
ß
CB
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Ca lu m et Cou nty
Comprehensive Plan
THIRD ST
T
ES
E
S CASALOMA DR
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
EH
IDA
City of
AK
T
EC
Undeve
S MEMORIA L DR
County
NL
ST
2018-2038
ek
Appleton Zoning Foxsha

Crossing Zoning T. Clayton
OS
Mena Chann el
re
PR
ßII
E FREMONT ST
Mud C
B-2: Community Business B-2: Community Bus

N GREEN BAY RD
A rr
ow
City of Appleton Tax Incr
ß
er
h v O
NAYMUT ST
Ri
B-3: Regional Business B-3: General Bus
ea
76 Fox
¾
%
d R
City
i v e rof Menasha
To w n o f
OSPECT AV
Clayton
W P ROSPECT AVE
I-1: Light Industrial
NICOLET BLVD
I-1: Light Ind Waterb
1ST ST
NORTHERN RD
City of Neenah
3RD ST
I-2: Heavy Industrial I-2: Heavy Ind

N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
Perenni
N
BA
Village of Harrison
DG
A M ERICA
M-1: Mixed Use

COLD SPRING RD
MA
S GREEN BAY RD
ER
IN
Village of Fox Crossing Zoning T. Neenah

N MEADE ST
Economic
ST
N DREW ST
AV
Interm
/
.
W PACKARD ST
HARRISON S T
114 E
Lake
Village
N DR
City of T. Greenville & Grand Chute

LARSEN RD
/
.
W
Zoning B-2: Community Bus

IS C
Town %
¾
441 10 ON
Winnebago
of Harrison %
¾ 441
Planning Area
S IN
Neenah Artificia
TULLAR RD
AV
Prosperity
RD
E
C: General Com B-3: General Bus
W COLLEGE AV
h E ST
CH
Data Sources:
S LAWE S T
u g AK
EA
OAK ST
Parcel
W i n n eb a g o C o u n t y
S lo S L
Municipal Boundaries: Wi
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
County C-2: Office Com Dist B-3(HB): General Bus (Highway)

S COMMERCIAL ST
Mor es
W SPENCER ST
Ca lu m et Cou nty

RE

MOR
Street Centerlines: Winneb

S HO
S PARK AVE
e D
CONGRESS ST
S LYNNDALE DR
ts
CL: Local Com M-1: Light Ind & Office

RD AV E
ES
Outagamie Counties.
Undeveloped, Zoned Commercial/Industrial
S ON
NNE
ah
GE
KE
CO
STEAD DR
ED
L it t le
ID NE Zoning: Fox Crossing (dat

LA
KR
Comprehensive Plan
IN
en
City of Appleton
A WW
B UTT
CP: Planned Com M-2: Heavy Ind

EID
Neenah (2009), Town of C

O
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
Ne
City of
A
T
Outagmie County (2017).

ty Bus
EC
S MEMORIA L DR
ST
TaxAppleton
Incremental District (TID)
2018-2038
A IR
P
City of Menasha CR: Regional Com

PO
OS
RT W CE CIL ST E CECIL ST
PR
RD
us
E FREMONT ST
RD
/
. ß
W
ST
10 JJ
City of Neenah IND: Industrial
N
TO
Waterbody
MELISSA
er
LE
v
Ri
P
2
AP
x NINTH ST
Village of Harrison
F o File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_EconomicProsperity.mxd
"
!
#
Printed By: abremer,
LONDON ST
41 OC
RD
PECT AVE
/
.
MILWAUKEE ST
W
TO
NI
114
Village
MA
Town
SEVENTH ST
Intermittent Stream/Rive of Harrison

TAYCO ST
D
R
KR
RACINE ST
D
AN
City of
N
ty Bus
PL
A
IC
Artificial Path/Ditch VALLEY RD Village of Fox Crossing

R
Parcel
E
D
AM
L ERS R
Menasha
us
Ca lu m et Cou nty
/
.
THIRD ST
T
ES
Data Sources: 10
%
¾
EH
441
Village of Fox Crossing %
¾
AK
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet 441

ral Bus (Highway) Planning Area Undeveloped, Zoned Commercial/Industrial
NL

Zoning
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and Foxsha
Mena Crossing
Chann el
Winnebago County, WI Zoning T. Clayton
& Office
Outagamie Counties.
R

ED
County
Zoning: Fox Crossing (date?), Town of
Y RD
Des
Tax Incremental District (TID)

OR
d Neenah (2009), Town of Clayton (2013) and

BA
NAYMUT ST
SH
B-3: Regional Business B-3: General Bus

ts

N GREEN
KE
STEAD DR
Mor
LA
I-1: Light Industrial I-1:City ofInd

Light Appleton Waterbody
NICOLET BLVD
1ST ST
A IR 0 0.375 0.75 Miles

3RD ST
I-2: Heavy Industrial I-2:City of Menasha

Heavy Ind
PO
RT
RD
RD
Print Date: 6/6/2018

ST
M-1: Mixed Use

MA
City of Neenah
S GREEN BAY RD
IN
TO
Zoning T. Neenah
MELISSA
ST
Intermittent Stream/Rive
PLE
HARRISON S T
E
Lake
AP
City of T. Greenville & Grand Chute

NINTH ST
Village of Harrison
W
Zoning B-2: Community Bus

IS C
LONDON ST
ON
Winnebago
D
S IN CR
Neenah
AO
C: General .
/
MILWAUKEE ST
W
TO V E
NI
ComVillage
114
B-3: General Bus
ST
MA
KE
Town
Data Sources:
OAK ST
SEVENTH ST
LA
of Harrison
h
RACINE ST S
C-2: Office Com Dist B-3(HB): General Bus (Highway)

TAYCO ST
ug
S COMMERCIAL ST
RD
NK and Outagamie Counties.
S lo
A
PL
S PARK AVE
CONGRESS ST
CL: Local Com M-1: Light Ind & Office

AV E
Parcel Outagamie Counties.
NNE
ah
CO
Zoning: Fox Crossing (date?), Town of
Ca lu m et Cou nty
en
THIRD ST
CP: Planned Com M-2: Heavy Ind Neenah (2009), Town of Clayton (2013) and
Ne

Undeveloped, Zoned Commercial/Industrial Appendix A | Community Indicators Report
Zoning Foxsha Crossing
W CE CIL ST
Mena Chann el E CECIL ST
Zoning T. Clayton
CR: Regional Com A-21
IND: Industrial 0 0.375 0.75 Miles
NAYMUT ST
B-3: Regional Business B-3: General Bus Print Date: 6/6/2018
I-1: Light Industrial

NICOLET BLVD
I-1: Light Ind Waterbody
T ST
ECONOMIC Community Development Block Rural Economic Development
DEVELOPMENT Grant - Public Facilities for (RED) Early Planning Grant
PROGRAMS Economic Development (CDBG- Program: The RED grant is a
PFED) Program: The CDBG-PFED program designed to assist
Tax Increment Financing (TIF): TIF is a federally funded program rural business with twenty-five
is a tool to build the local tax base administered by the Wisconsin employees or less. Grants may only
- it allows the Village to borrow Department of Administration be used for professional services
money to build infrastructure or (WIDOA). This grant is designed such as preparation of a feasibility
assist development projects, and to assist communities that want study, market study, or business
then pay off those loans with the to expand or upgrade their plan.
new tax revenue. The Village has infrastructure to accommodate
three active TIF districts (#1, #2 and businesses that will create new jobs. WI Development Fund (WDF)
#3), all created between 2015 and Programs: There are two WDF
2017. District boundaries are shown Community Development Block p ro gra m s : t h e Te c h n o l o g y
on the following page. Grant - Economic Development Development Fund and Major
(CDBG-ED) Program: The CDBG-ED Economic Development Program.
Winnebago County Revolving is a federally funded program The Technology Development
Loan Fund: Winnebago County administered by the Wisconsin Fund helps finance products
manages a revolving loan fund and Department of Administration research and development, and
makes loans to businesses in the (WIDOA). It is designed to assist commercialization. The Major
County that promote economic businesses that will invest private Economic Development Program
development and job creation/ funds and create jobs as they provides financial assistance for
retention. These loans have low expand or relocate to Wisconsin. business startups or expansions
fixed interest rates. Principle and WIDOA awards funds to a local unit that can create or retain a significant
interest are required to be repaid of government as a grant, which number of jobs and to leverage
within five years. The total amount then loans the funds to a business private capital investment.
in the fund is $2.7 million. that commits to create jobs for low-
and moderate-income residents. Transportation Facilities Economic
Wisconsin Economic When the business repays the loan, Assistance and Development
Development Corporation: the community retains the funds to Program: This funds transportation
As the state’s lead economic start a revolving loan fund. facility improvements (e.g. road, rail,
development organization, the harbor and airport) that are part of
Wisconsin Economic Development Community Development Zones: an economic development project.
Corporation ( WEDC) nurtures These are special designated areas This grant program is administered
business growth and job creation in the State. Once created they exist by the Wisconsin Department of
in Wisconsin by providing resources, for twenty years with a potential for Transportation.
technical support, and financial extending the zone for another five
assistance to companies, partners years. The zones range from small
and the communities they serve. rural areas to large metropolitan
The WEDC administers a variety areas. A certified employer in a
of economic and community zone can earn a tax credit against
development programs for private a Wisconsin income tax liability for
businesses and municipalities. Visit job creation and for environmental
www.inwisconsin.com to learn remediation.
more.
Figure 1
Town of Menasha Tax Increment District # 2
District Boundaries
TID #1 TID #2
Figure 1
Village of Fox Crossing Tax Increment District # 3
District Boundaries
TID #3

AG R ICU LT U R A L &
NAT U R A L R E S OU RCE S
NATURAL RESOURCES soil associations in the Village are AGRICULTURAL LAND &
Hortonville, Manawa, Winneconne, OPEN SPACE
PHYSIOGRAPHY Neenah and Whalen. Hortonville
soils are well-drained and most There is approximately 4,560 acres
The Village is geographically divided areas are used for crops or pasture. of agricultural and open space in the
in two by Little Lake Butte des Morts, Manawa soils are nearly level and planning area. This is approximately
also known as the Fox River. somewhat poorly drained. Many 24% of the land area. A map of prime
areas of these soils are drained and farmland areas within the planning
The bedrock in the Village is used for crops. Winneconne soils area is shown on page A-26. “Prime
Platteville-Galena limestone, which are well-drained, slowly permeable farmland” designates land that has
can be blasted and removed for and nearly level. Most areas are the best combination of physical
sub-grade foundations. The largest used for cultivated crops. Neenah and chemical soil characteristics
concentration of this bedrock is in soils are somewhat poorly drained for producing food, feed, forage,
the south-central section of the west soils and can be drained and used fiber, and oilseed crops according to
side of the Village. High bedrock for cropland. Whalen soils are well- the Natural Resource Conservation
(ranging in depth from surface level drained and moderately permeable. Service.
to thirty inches below the surface) Refer to page A-26 for a map of
can be found at the intersection of Productive Agricultural Areas based RARE SPECIES
County BB and Cold Spring Road, on average soil conditions.
south USH 10, and the intersection The Wisconsin Department of Natural
of 9th Street and Manitowoc Street. TOPOGRAPHY Resources monitors a Wisconsin
Natural Heritage Database, which
VEGETATION The Village of Fox Crossing is provides generalized information
relatively flat, with only eighty feet about endangered and threatened
Woodland areas can be found in of change in elevation from the species by occurrence by County,
varying degrees throughout the highest area to the lowest area. Town, Range and Section. The table
Village. On the eastside pockets Elevations along Little Lake Buttes on the following page identifies
of woodlands can be found in des Morts are around 750 feet and those that have been found within
undeveloped or undevelopable reach 830 feet at the far west side the Village of Fox Crossing area (i.e.
lands such as areas of steep slopes. of the Village, and 810 feet on the T20R17E).
The largest stands of forested lands east side. With the exception of the
can be found on the west side of the eastern shoreline of Little Lake Butte WATER RESOURCES
Village in the Stroebe Island Marsh, des Morts, which is developed,
in park lands, around the Municipal steep slopes are not an issue in DRAINAGE BASIN &
Complex, north of Shady Lane and Fox Crossing based on average WATERSHED
west of Cold Spring Road. Smaller soil conditions as shown on the
pockets can be found dispersed Development Limitations Map (refer The Village of Fox Crossing is
throughout the remainder of the to page A-27). located within the Lower Fox River
west side. Basin, which is further divided into
METALLIC & NON-METALLIC watersheds and sub-watersheds.
SOILS RESOURCES The majority of the Village falls
within the Fox Mainstream sub-
According to the Soil Survey of There are no metallic mineral mining watershed. The Lower Fox River
Winnebago County prepared by operations within the Village. The empties a drainage basin of 6,349
the Natural Resources Conservation Village does have five active non- square miles, flowing northeast
Service of the US Department metallic mining sites. from the outlet of Lake Winnebago
of Agriculture, the predominant to the bay of Green Bay. The Fox
Endangered & Threatened Species
River Valley is one of Wisconsin's Source: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
most urbanized and industrialized
Protection
areas. Most of these urban and Common Name Scientific Name
Status
industrial areas are close to the
Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens SC/H
river and have contributed to water
quality problems such as degraded Yerba-de-tajo Eclipta prostrata SC
aquatic habitat and low population, Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus END
limited fish diversity, sedimentation Migratory Bird Concentration Site Migratory Bird Concentration Site SC
and excessive nutrient levels, high
levels of toxic materials in bottom Protection Status: Endangered (END), Special Concern (SC), Take Regulated by
sediment, and inver tebrate Establishment of Open Closed Seasons (SC/H)
organisms that are consumed by
fish. The water quality of the basin is
improving; the Lower Fox River Basin boundary surrounding several FLOODPLAINS
has been given statewide attention areas of St. Peter Sandstone. This
for improving and protecting water area was identified by WDNR in Floods are the nation’s most
quality. the 1990's. Wells drilled in this area common natural disaster and
have the potential to produce water therefore require sound land use
SURFACE WATER contaminated with arsenic. The plans to minimize their effects.
Village's four wells are routinely Benefits of floodplain management
The Village of Fox Crossing has a tested, and have all been deemed are the reduction and filtration of
significant amount of surface water. safe for drinking. sediments into area surface water,
There is a large amount of water storage of floodwaters during
frontage in and along Little Lake WETLANDS regional storms, habitat for fish and
Buttes Des Morts. Little Lake Butte wildlife, and reductions in direct and
Des Morts is a 1,200 acre lake with Wetlands provide valuable wildlife indirect costs due to floods.
a maximum depth of 18 feet. Lake habitat and contribute greatly to
fish include panfish, largemouth the aesthetic appeal of an area. Federal Emergency Management
bass, smallmouth bass, northern The Village's major wetland is in Agency (FEMA) designated 100-
pike, walleye, sturgeon and catfish. the Stroebe Island area. Significant and 500-year floodplains within the
There are two boat landings on the residential development has planning area. The Development
lake; both of which are located in already taken place on the Island, Limitations Map (on A-27) displays
the Village. but it is expected that little, if any, the 100-year floodplain in the
further development will take place planning area. Within the planning
GROUNDWATER because of the importance of this area there are 1,082 acres of
environmentally sensitive area. floodplain (6% of the planning area).
While there is some correlation There is 693 acres of wetland in the Within the Village of Fox Crossing
between the location of surface planning area and 345 acres within there are approximately 954 acres
water and high ground water the Village. of floodplain (11% of the Village). All
levels, there are numerous areas of the floodplain lie along Little Lake
of high ground water in the Village These lands are generally Butte des Morts and its tributaries.
where there are no apparent surface not conducive for intensive
indications of it, such as a stream development due to erosive
corridor or a wetland. character, high compressibility and
instability, low bearing capacity,
The Village is located in an Arsenic and high shrink-swell potential of
Advisory Area, which is a five mile the soil.

Productive Agriculture Map
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
N
BA
DG
ER
N MEADE ST
Prod
N DREW ST
AV
W PACKARD ST
N
MALL
DR
Agricult
W COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV
S LAWE S T
G rand C hute
ß "
!
#
S LYNNDALE DR
CB
Greenville
S O
41
Town of
To w n o f
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Compre
N EID
S CASALOMA DR
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
City of
A
T
EC
S MEMORIA L DR
ST
201
ek
P
Appleton
OS
re
PR
E FREMONT ST
Mud C
er
v
Ri
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W P ROSPECT AVE
NORTHERN RD
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
Village of Fox
N MEADE ST
Productive
IRISH RD
N DR /
.
10
%
¾
441
%
¾ Planning Area
Agricultural Areas
441
H RD
S LAWE S T
EA C M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP)

County
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
E SHADY LN
Mor es
RE

MOR
S HO
e D
ts
ES
City of Applet
KE
Comprehensive Plan
STEAD DR
ED
L it t le
LA
H RIVER ST
B UTT
City of Menas
2018-2038
W EST AMERICAN DR
N MASON ST
A IR
N DIVISION ST
PO
N
ONT ST RT
BA
City of Neena
RD
DG
RD
/
.
ER
ST
N MEADE ST
10
Productive
N DREW ST
AV
N
TO
MELISSA
W PACKARD ST
Village of Har
LE
P
AP
NINTH ST
N
"
!
#
MALL
LONDON ST
JACOBSEN RD
41
FAIRVIEW RD
RD
DR
Agricultural Areas
COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV OC
.
/ Town
MILWAUKEE ST
W
TO
NI
114
S LAWE S T
IRISH RD
Village
MA
SEVENTH ST
of Harrison
CER ST W SPENCER ST
TAYCO ST
D
R
Farmland Classificat
R

RACINE ST
D
NK
City of
N
"
!
A
#
S LYNNDALE DR
PL
A
IC
S O
R
41 E
D
AM
L ERS R
Menasha All areas are p

S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
ß Comprehensive Plan
NE
E SOUTH C B ST
Ca lu m et Cou nty
S CASALOMA DR
AV RIVER
Planning Area
IDA
THIRD ST
T
%
¾ City of
ES
441
T
EH
EC
S MEMORIA L DR
AK
ST
Prime farmlan
2018-2038
ek
Appleton
NL
OS
re
PR
E FREMONT ST
Mena sha Chann el
Mud C
County ßII
W
Prime farmlan
N GREEN BAY RD
A rr
er
ow v
Ri
ß
h
O Farmland of s
NAYMUT ST
Fox
City of Appleton
ea
76
%
¾
d R
To w n o f
P ROSPECT AVE
Clayton
iWv e r
City of Menasha
NICOLET BLVD
NORTHERN RD
Waterbody
1ST ST
3RD ST
City of Neenah
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
A M ERICA
Village ofIN Fox Crossing Perennial Stre

BA
MA
S GREEN BAY RD
DG
Village of Harrison
VALLEY RD
ER
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) ST
N MEADE ST
Productive
N DREW ST
AV
N DR
/
. Intermittent
HARRISON S T
W PACKARD ST
10
E
Lake
%
¾ 441
LARSEN RD
%
¾ 441 Planning Area
W
IS C
ON City of Winnebago
Town
RD
S IN
Neenah Artificial Path

TULLAR RD
AV
Village W COLLEGE AV
CH
Agricultural Areas
E
h E ST
EA
Harrison County
u g AK
OAK ST
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
S LAWE S T
S lo S L
Mor es
Farmland Classification
Data Sources:
RE

MOR
S COMMERCIAL ST
S HO
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Ca

W SPENCER ST
e D
ts
ES
S PARK AVE

CONGRESS ST
City of Appleton
KE
All areas are prime farmland

RD AV E
S LYNNDALE DR
STEAD DR
ED
L it t le
NE
ah
GE Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calum

LA
ON
S O
ID EC
B UTT
KR INN
Outagamie Counties.
en
WW
Comprehensive Plan
A
NE
City of Menasha
O
Prime farmland if drained Farmland Classification: Based on USD

Ne
V E SOUTH RIVER ST
IDA
City of
A IR
NRCS Soils (SSURGO).
T
EC
PO
S MEMORIA L DR
ST
RT
2018-2038
P
Appleton City of Neenah

RD
Prime farmland if protected from flooding
OS
RD
/
.
PR
ST
E FREMONT ST
10
ß
N
W
TO
JJ
MELISSA
Farmland of statewide importance Village of Harrison

LE
P
er
AP
v NINTH ST
"
!
# Ri
LONDON ST
41 Printed By: abremer,

F o x File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_ProductiveAgricultural.mxd
CR
D
WO
Waterbody /
. Town
MILWAUKEE ST
TO
NI
114
Village
MA
SEVENTH ST
of Harrison
TAYCO ST
D
R
R
City Perennial Stream/River

RACINE ST
D
NK
of
N
A
PL
A
IC
R
E
D

L ERS R
Menasha
Intermittent Stream/Rive All areas are prime farmland
Ca lu m et Cou nty
VALL
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) THIRD STEY RD
T
ES
EH
/
.
AK
%
¾ Artificial
10 Path/Ditch Prime farmland if drained
441
Planning Area
NL
Mena sha Chann el %

¾ 441

M Data
IDW AYSources:
RD (COUNTY RD AP) Village of Fox Crossing
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet County
R
ED
Farmland of statewide importance

NAYMUT ST

HOR

ES
Outagamie Counties.
City of Appleton
STEAD DR
AK
NICOLET BLVD
Farmland Classification: Based on USDA-
Waterbody
1ST ST
NRCS Soils (SSURGO).

3RD ST
A IR
PO
City of Menasha
RT
0 0.35 0.7 Miles City of Neenah

MA RD
IN
RD
ST
ST
ON
MELISSA
HARRISON S T
Lake
ET
City of Village of Harrison

W
PL
IS C
AP
NINTH ST O NS
Winnebago
Neenah
IN
LONDON ST
AV
E D
CR
h E ST
WO
/
. Town
a hMILWAUKEE ST
TO
NI
u g AK
114
OAK ST
Village
MA
S lo S L
SEVENTH ST Data Sources: Village of Fox Crossing

S COMMERCIAL ST
of Harrison
D
R
S PARK AVE
RACINE ST

CONGRESS ST
A NK
PL
n eb a g o C o u n t y
Outagamie Counties.
en
All areas are prime farmland Farmland Classification: Based on USDA-

A-26 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i nPrime
lu m et Cou nty
THIRD ST
g | Comprehensive Plan NRCS Soils (SSURGO).
W CE CIL ST
farmland if drained E CECIL ST
Mena sha Chann el

0 0.35 0.7 Miles
Farmland of statewide importance Print Date: 6/6/2018

YMUT ST
Development Limitations Map
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
City of
N
BA
DG
Appleton
N MEADE ST
E
De
N DREW ST
R
AV
W PACKARD ST
To w n o f G r a n d C h u t e
N
A LL
M
Li
DR
W COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV
Greenville
To w n o f
S ONEI
S L AW
ß
S LYNNDALE DR
CB
E ST
DA S
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Com
ST
E SOUTH RIV E R
T
S CASALOMA DR
AV
T
EC
P
S MEMORIAL D R
OS
PR
M
E FREMONT ST
W
d C re
ek
Outagamie County WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
W PROSPECT AV
W PROSPECT AVE
W inneba go Co unty
NORTHERN RD
A MERICAN DR
COLD SPRING RD
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) VALL EY RD

N MEADE ST
Development
N DREW ST
Villag
RD
CH
/
.
EA
10
%
¾441
B
%
¾ 441
TS
Limitations
M OR
Plan
ES
ED
er
E SHADY LN E SHADY LN
BUTT
DR
iv
S L AW

Coun
ORE
x
Fo
E ST
SH
A ST
STEAD DR
KE
Comprehensive Plan Des B utte
ST
LA
ts
E SOUTH RIV E R
City
L a k e t le
N MASON ST
Mor
N DIVISION ST
W EST AMERICAN DR
City of
2018-2038
A IR
N
PO
L it
BA
City
RT
DG
Appleton
E FREMONT ST RD
N MEADE ST
E
Development
N DREW ST
RD
/
.
R
ST
AV
10
N
TO
City
MELISSA
W PACKARD ST RD
LE
TO W OC
ANI
N
P
M
AP
A LL NINTH ST
M
Limitations
Villag
DR
LONDON ST
FAIRVIEW RDW COLLEGE AV JACOBSEN RD
IRISH RD
COLLEGE AV
/
.
MILWAUKEE ST
114
Village
S ONEI
ER ST W SPENCER ST SEVENTH ST
S L AW
JA
of Harrison Town
CO
TAYCO ST
RD
R
S LYNNDALE DR
RACINE ST
D
SE
NK
E ST
City of
N
DA S
A
PL
N
A
IC
RD
Y RD R
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Comprehensive Plan
ST E
D
AM
L ERS R
Village of Fox Crossing Menasha

E SOUTH RIV E R
T
S CASALOMA DR
Wate
AV
Ca lu m et Cou nty
T
THIRD ST
EC
T
ES
EH
2018-2038
P
S MEMORIAL D R
%
¾
OS
AK
441
CB ST ß
NL
PR
M
Planning Area
E FREMONT
Floo
u
Mena sha Chan nel

d C re
ßII
N GREEN BAY RD
A rr
ß
ow
County
ek
O
Aver
h
"
!
#
NAYMUT ST
ea
W PROSPECT AV
41
To w n o f
W PROSPECT AVE
76
%
¾
Clayton
NORTHERN RD
d R
i v er
A MERICAN DR
City of Appleton
NICOLET BLVD
N MASON ST
Wetl
N DIVISION ST
1ST ST
City of
N
3RD ST
BA
DG
CityAppleton
of Menasha
COLD SPRING RD
N MEADE ST
E
Development
N DREW ST
R
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) VALL EY RD MAIN ST
Pere
AV

RD
S GREEN BAY RD
W PACKARD ST
CH
City of Neenah /
.
EA
10 441 RD
%
¾ Inte
HARRISON S T
Lake
B
%
¾ 441
Limitations
City of
TS
LARSEN E
W COLLEGE AV W
M OR
Village of Harrison
IS C
Planning Area Winnebago
ON
Neenah
TULLAR RD
S IN
/
. Artif
ES
AV
114
MIDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP) E
h E ST
ED
Village
S ONEI
er
W SPENCER ST
S L AW
E SHADY LN
u g AK
BUTT
OAK ST
DR
iv
Town County
S lo S L
of Harrison
R
S LYNNDALE DR
ORE
S COMMERCIAL ST
E ST
x
DA S
Fo
SH
Comprehensive Plan
STEAD DR
ST
S PARK AVE
CONGRESS ST
KE
E SOUTH RIV ERRD AV E

T
D e s B u tTt e
AV
NE
ah
LA
ts
Data Sources: GE
Waterbody
ON
City of Appleton
ID EC
C
KR INN
Ca lu m et Cou nty
L a k ePROtSle
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet and Outagamie Counties.

en
PE
Mor
2018-2038
WW
A
S MEMORIAL D R
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and Outagamie Counties.

A IR
Ne
PO
L it
City of WMenasha
Wetland: Fish and Wildlife Service (May 2017, does not include wetlands classified as T R
E FREMONT ST R
W
Floodplain
lakes, riverine or freshwater ponds). Refer to WDNR for current Wisconsin Wetland
RD
.
/
CECIL ST E CECIL ST
ST
10 Inventory.
N
TO
Floodplain: FEMA (100-yr).

ß City of Neenah
MELISSA
RD
LE
W OC
NITOJJ
Steep Slopes: Based on USDA-NRCS Soils (SSURGO).
P
MA
AP
NINTH ST
Average Slope Grade Greater than 12%
Village of Harrison
LONDON ST
OSPECT AVE
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_DevelopmentLimitations.mxd
.
/
MILWAUKEE ST
114
Village
Wetland
SEVENTH ST
JA
of Harrison Town
CO
TAYCO ST
RD
R
RACINE ST
D
SE
NK
City of
N
VALL EY RD A
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) PL
N
A
IC
RD
Perennial Stream/River Village of Fox Crossing

E
D
M
L ERS R
Menasha
A
Waterbody
/
.
Ca lu m et Cou nty
10 THIRD ST
%
¾
T
441
ES
%
¾
EH
441
AK
Planning Area
NL
Mena sha Chan nel Floodplain

er
DR
iv

BAY RD
County
R
ORE
Village of Fox Crossing Average Slope Grade Greater than 12%

"
!
#
NAYMUT ST
SH
41
N GREEN
STEAD DR
KE
LA
NICOLET BLVD
City of Appleton
Wetland
1ST ST
A IR
PO
3RD ST
City of Menasha
RT
RD
RD
MAIN ST
ST
N
S GREEN BAY RD
TO
City of Neenah
MELISSA
RD
LE
W OC
NITO
P
MA
0 0.35 0.7 Miles
AP
NINTH ST
HARRISON S T
Lake
City of Village of Harrison
E
LONDON ST
W
IS C
ON Winnebago
.
/
MILWAUKEE ST
Neenah 114 Print Date: 6/6/2018

S IN
Village Artificial Path/Ditch

AV
E
ST
SEVENTH ST
E
Town
RACINE ST AK
OAK ST
of Harrison
TAYCO ST

RD
h
S
NK
ug
S COMMERCIAL ST
A
PL
S lo
S PARK AVE
CONGRESS ST
AV E
NNE
Waterbody
ah
Ca lu m et Cou nty
THIRD ST
en

Ne
Chan
Mena sha W nel
CECIL ST E CECIL ST Floodplain
0 0.35 0.7 Miles

Average Slope Grade Greater than 12%
NAYMUT ST

NICOLET BLVD
T
CO MMU NI T Y F ACILITIE S & SE RV ICES
GENERAL FACILITIES also provides emergency 911 to be sent from one library in the
services. The Department employs system to another for convenience
HEALTH CARE FACILITIES five (5) administrative positions, in obtaining materials.
48 part-time and paid-on-call
There are currently no hospitals firefighters and one (1) part- GOVERNMENT FACILITIES
within the Village. The hospitals that time administrative assistant. All
serve the Village are St. Elizabeth fire fighters are Wisconsin state • Municipal Complex, located at
in Appleton and Theda Clark in certified EMS First Responders. The 2000 Municipal Drive
Neenah. Outpatient surgery is Department operates two (2) fire • Community Center, located at
performed at the Affinity Clinic on stations - Fire Station #40 is located 1000 Valley Road
Midway Road in the City of Menasha. at 1326 Cold Spring Road (on the
There are a number of doctors and west side of the Village) and was PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES
dentists offices located either within built in 1982. The facility is still in
the Village or in close proximity. good condition. Fire Station #41 is The west side of the Village is served
located at 1000 Valley Road (on the by the Neenah School District. The
There are 14 Community-Based east side of the Village, the same east side is served by the Menasha
Residential Facilities (CBRFs) located building as the Community Center). Joint School District with the
in Fox Crossing. A CBRF is a place The original building was likely built exception of a small portion of the
where five or more unrelated people in the late 1950's. This facility is also northeastern portion of the Village
live together in a community. Room in good condition. that is served by the Appleton
and board, supervision, support School District.
services and up to three hours of CEMETERIES
nursing care per week are provided. The Neenah School District has seen
Typically these facilities are for There are four cemeteries in the minimal growth over the past ten
seniors, dementia/alzheimer's Village of Fox Crossing. years. There has been an increase
patients or those with disabilities. in enrollment of 3.2% from 2006 to
• Resthaven Cemetery, located at 2015. Enrollment for the 2015-2016
POLICE & EMERGENCY 206 North Street school year was 6,538.
FACILITIES • St. John's Catholic Cemetery,
located at 566 Midway Road The Menasha Joint School District
The Village is served by the Fox • St. Mary's, located on Racine has seen a decline in growth over
Crossing Police Department. The Street the past ten years. There has been a
Department employs three (3) • St. Patrick's Catholic Cemetery, decrease in enrollment of 4.1% from
administrative, five (5) investigative, located at 350 Green Bay Road 2006 to 2015. Enrollment for the
20 patrol and six (6) support staff. The 2015-2016 school year was 3,595.
police station and administrative LIBRARY FACILITIES
offices share the same building - the The Appleton Area School District
Municipal Complex located at 2000 The libraries in the cities of Appleton, has seen some growth over the
Municipal Drive. The facility was Menasha and Neenah are the ones past ten years. There has been an
constructed in 1996 and is in good most commonly used by the people increase in enrollment of 7.1% from
condition. There are no upcoming in the Village. Additionally, there 2006 to 2015. Enrollment for the
plans for repairs, improvements or exists an inter-county agreement 2015-2016 school year was 16,331.
construction of a new station. whereby patrons may use one
library card to check out books
The Village is served by the Fox from any library in the system.
Crossing Fire Department, which Patrons may also request books
Community and Public Facilities Map
N MASON ST
Appleton Appleton kk Columbus ES
N MEADE ST
West HS k Lincoln ES Bilingual School
k
N DREW ST
Co
Christian Cooperative
W PACKARD ST
Preschool k
k k
N
St Paul Lutheran School
BA
k Edison ES
N
Wilson MS
DG
MALL
I
G Appleton Library
ER
DR
W COLLEGE AV Valley New School k
AV
W COLLEGE AV
S LAWE S T
Appleton Community 4K G Appleton Police
W SPENCER ST W SPENCER ST k IGIG
k I Outagamie Sheriff
Town
G rand C hute
Badger ES
ß "
!
Police
S LYNNDALE DR
CB
Greenville
S O
41
Town of
To w n o f
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
S M E MORIAL DR
Com
NE
kJefferson ES
S CASALOMA DR
E SOUTH RIVER ST
IDA
ST
V
ek
T A
Xavier HS
re
EC
k E FREMONT ST
Mud C
SP
City of
RO
W P
er
Appleton
v
Ri Foster ES
Outagamie County Fox k
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
W PROSPECT AV
W P ROSPECT AVE
k
Winneb ago County
NORTHERN RD
James Madison MS
kk Columbus ES T. Menasha 18
17
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
N MEADE ST
Fire I
IRISH RD
G
N DREW ST
VALLEY RD
16
Community
Cooperative
N DR
Preschool k /
.
10
School Edison ES k k
08
%
¾
441
%
¾ 441
RD
IG Appleton Library UW-Fox Valley
k
CH
k 03 Maplewood MS
Facilities
l Fox Crossing
k
EA
Police I
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
G
S LAWE S T
E SHADY LN
Mor es
ton Police
RE

MOR
S HO
e D
gamie Sheriff
ts
ES
KE
STEAD DR
ED
L it t le
LA
09 19
S ON
20
B UTT
01 15
Comprehensive Plan
N MASON ST
Appleton Columbus
DR ES kk
E
E SOUTH RIVER ST Appleton W EST AMERICAN

k
N MEADE ST
IDA
West HS k Lincoln ES Bilingual School

Gegan ES
A IR
PO
k 02
N DREW ST
RT
ST
2018-2038
RD
Community
Christian Cooperative
RD
k /
.
ST
E FREMONT ST
10
W PACKARD ST
Preschool
N
k Clovis
TO
k
N
MELISSA
City of
St Paul Lutheran School
BA
Grove ES
k
LE
T. Menasha
Edison ES
14
N
Wilson MS
k
DG
MALL
I
P
G Appleton Library
Fire
AP
Clayton ES
ER
Appleton
NINTH ST
10
"
!
#
DR
k
Facilitiesk
W COLLEGE AV
k Valley NewJACOBSEN
School RD
AV
ter ES I
G
LONDON ST
W COLLEGE AV
41
FAIRVIEW RD
RD
kSt. OC
S LAWE S T
/
.
MILWAUKEE ST
W
Appleton Community 4K G Appleton Police TO
k k IGIG 05 13 NI
114
IRISH RD
Village
MA
W SPENCER ST W SPENCER ST Mary MS Menasha HS
James Madison MS k I Outagamie Sheriff
Town
of Harrison
G rand C hute
Badger ES SEVENTH ST
TAYCO ST
"
!
Police
#
S LYNNDALE DR
D
R
04 KR
RACINE ST
D
S O
41 AN
City of
N
Town of
PL
A
IC
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
S M E MORIAL DR
Comprehensive Plan
12
R
NE
E
kJefferson ES
D
AM
L ERS R
Menasha
S CASALOMA DR
E SOUTH RIVER ST
ß
IDA
CB
Ca lu m et Cou nty
Park ID Name
RD
THIRD ST
ST
k
2018-2038
V
ek
Menasha Police
EH
St. Mary ES
T A
Xavier HS 11 II GG 01 Gateway Subdivision Open Space

re
07 k
EC
k E FREMONT ST Menasha Library

Mud C
%
¾ 441 Trinity Luthern
SP
06 Spring Mena sha Chan nel 02 Meadow Heights Park

City of
RO
Grade School
Planning Area ßII Road ES
W P
er
MS
k 03 Anunson Farm Park
Appleton
iv
N GREEN BAY RD
A rr R Foster ES
N LA KE
ow Fox k 04 O'Houser Park

ß
Nicolet ES
h
O k
NAYMUT ST
W PROSPECT AV
ea
County
W P ROSPECT AVE
%
¾76 k 05 Wildlife Heights Open Space
d R
ST
D
To w n o f
James Madison MS
Clayton
NORTHERN R
i v er NICOLET BLVD 06 Strohmeyer Park

ST
Appleton kk Columbus ES
1ST ST
Appleton
07 Roy Kuehn Park
N MEADE ST
N MASON
k LincolnCity
ES
of Bilingual
Appleton School
3RD ST
West HS
T. Menasha 18
k
N DREW ST
17
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
08 Woodland Prairie Park

Fire I kRoosevelt ES
Community
Christian Cooperative G
City of Menasha 16 k VALLEY RD

09 Schildt Park
Parks/Open Space
W PACKARD ST MA
Preschool
S GREEN BAY RD
k k Taft ES IN
N
k
N DR
Fox Valley
/
.
St Paul Lutheran School ST
BA
Wilson MS k Edison ES
10 k441 10 Westfield Park
%
¾
DG
I 441 Christian Academy

City of Neenah
G Appleton Library
% k
¾
HARRISON S T
St. Gabriel ES Neenah-Menasha Lake

ER
08
City of Village of Fox Crossing
LARSEN RD
k
Facilities
Valley New School
11 Kippenhan Park
RD
AV
UW-Fox Valley Fire

Planning
G Neenah Area
W COLLEGE AV
Martin Luther I
k I
G
Winnebago
CH
Maplewood MS Lutheran School k Neenah

S LAWE S T
TULLAR RD
k 12 Fritse Park
E
Appleton Community 4K
EA
Village of
k Harrison
G Appleton Police
I Library W
Other Municipal Park

M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP) IS C
I k
TS B
Bu t La ke
h E ST
I
DR
G G Trinity ON
13 Gant Park
.
/
W SPENCER ST
k I
Mor es
S IN
G Outagamie Sheriff Lutheran School

u g AK
RE
114 Town
MOR
Village County
AV
S lo S L
Data Sources:
E
S HO
Police
14 Huber Open Space
S LYNNDALE DR
Private Golf Course

e D
St Margaret Mary ES
S COMMERCIAL ST
ts
k
S O
DE S
Municipal Boundaries: W
of Harrison Town
KE
15 Butte des Morts Park

STEAD DR
L it t le
S BLU MND DR
S M E MORIALtDR
and Outagamie Counties
Comprehensive Plan
S PARK AVE
LA
19
CONGRESS ST
NE
09
TTE
kJefferson ES RD AV E
OAK ST
20
E SOUTH RIVER STE
NE Bike Trail/Path and sidew
IDA
ah
15
City of Appleton 16 Pearl-Stroebe-Cox Open Space
ON
V BU
G
RID EC
Community Facility
INN Wisconsin Regional Plan
en
AK
ICAN DR
k k
ST
WW
Waterbody
2018-2038
17 Annex Lane Street Centerlines: Winne
A IR
O
T A
Ne
Ca lu m et Cou nty
Gegan ES PO
Wilson ES
Xavier HS Outagamie Counties.
City ofE CECIL
Menasha
RT
EC
k E FREMONT ST RD
k Education 18 Palisades Park
SP
Subdivision Open Space

RD
/
. City of
ST
ST
RO
W CE CIL ST
10
N
Horace 19 Wittmann Park

W P
Clovis
TO
er
HeightsT.Park City
k of Neenah
MELISSA
Appleton
v Mann MS
Ri
ß Municipal Facility
Grove ES
LE
Menasha 14 Foster ES
k JJ I 20 Fritsch Park
P
G
Fire Fox k
AP
Farm Park
NINTH ST
10
I
G
"
!
# Intermittent Stream/Rive Village of Harrison
LONDON ST
RD
Park 41 R D
PECT AVE
kSt. Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_CommunityFacilities.mxd k OC
/
.
MILWAUKEE ST
W
TO
13 James Madison MS NI
114
eights Open Space Mary MS k
Artificial Path/Ditch Village
MA
Menasha HS
er Park
of Harrison Town
SEVENTH ST
TAYCO ST
RD
T. Menasha 18
R
RACINE ST
D
K
n Park 17 AN
City of
N
PL
A
IC Fire I
Paved Bike Trail/Path
G
12 RD P)
R
E VALLEY RD
16
D
d Prairie Park
M VALLEY RD (COUNTY
L ERS R
Menasha
A
Waterbody
Ca lu m et Cou nty
/
. Park ID Name
THIRD ST
rk 10 k St. Mary ES441
%
¾441
Unpaved Bike Trail/Path
Menasha Police
EH
Park 07 11 GI
IG
UW-Fox Valley Menasha Library k %
¾ 01 Gateway Subdivision Open Space
Spring k
Trinity Luthern
Maplewood MS
Mena sha Chan nel 02 Planning
Meadow Area
Heights Park Perennial Stream/River
n Park M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP) Grade School k
Road ES
Sidewalks 03 Anunson Farm Park
DR
k k
Mor es
N GREEN BAY RD
RE
CountyPark
N LA KE
Nicolet ES 04 O'Houser
S HO
e D
k
NAYMUT ST
ts

KE
pen Space Data Sources: 05 Wildlife Heights Open Space

STEAD DR
ST
LA
Municipal19 Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet

20 06 Strohmeyer Park
15
Morts Park Winnebago County, WI City of Appleton
NICOLET BLVD
1ST ST
Bike Trail/Path and sidewalks:

oebe-Cox Open Space Gegan ES Wisconsin Regional Planning
A IR East Central k 07 Roy Kuehn Park
3RD ST
Paved Bike Trail/Path

PO
RT Commission
ne Street Centerlines: Winnebago,

RD
Calumet and
k 08 City of Menasha
Woodland Prairie Park
RD
Outagamie Counties.
ST
Roosevelt ES
09 Schildt Park
Parks/Open Space
MA
Park
S GREEN BAY RD
Unpaved Bike Trail/Path

N
Taft ES ST Clovis
TO
IN
City ofPark
Neenah
MELISSA
Fox Valley
Grove ES k
LE
Park
tian Academy k k 10 Westfield
k
P
HARRISON S T
St. Gabriel ES Lake

AP
Neenah-Menasha
City of 0.35Village0.7 ofMiles
Fox Crossing
NINTH ST
rk
Fire
0 11 Kippenhan Park
Village of Harrison
LONDON ST
Martin Luther I
GD
I
G Neenah CR
k Winnebago Sidewalks
Neenah .
Lutheran School WO
TULLAR RD
12 Fritse Park
/
MILWAUKEE ST
E
TO
NI Library
W
Other
114
Municipal Park
IS C
k Village
h E ST
Trinity
k
MA
ON
Menasha HS S IN Print Date: 6/6/2018 13 Gant Park
Lutheran School
u g AK
Town
AV
of Harrison
S lo S L

SEVENTH ST
Data Sources:
E
TAYCO ST
14 Huber Open Space

Private Golf Course
D
KR St Margaret Mary ES
S COMMERCIAL ST
RACINE ST
PL
A N
k Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet
15 Butte des Morts Park and Outagamie Counties. Winnebago County, WI
S PARK AVE
CONGRESS ST
AV E
OAK ST
NE Bike Trail/Path and sidewalks: East Central

ah
16 Waterbody Open Space

Pearl-Stroebe-Cox
ON
EC
Ca lu m et Cou nty
Community Facility
INN THIRD ST
Park ID Name Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission
en
W
Menasha Police
W
St. Mary ES k k 17 Annex Lane Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and
Ne
GI
I G
Menasha Library k
Wilson ES
01 Gateway Subdivision Open Space Appendix A | Community Indicators Report Outagamie Counties.
A-29
ty Luthern
de School Mena sha
W CE CIL ST nel
Chan 02 STMeadow
E CECIL Education
Heights Park k 18 Palisades Park
Horace 19 Wittmann Park
Mann MS 03 Anunson Farm Park
k I
G Municipal Facility 20 Intermittent
Fritsch Park Stream/Rive 0 0.35 0.7 Miles
Nicolet ES 04 O'Houser Park
k
NAYMUT ST
05 Wildlife Heights Open Space

Artificial Path/Ditch Print Date: 6/6/2018
NICOLET BLVD 06 Strohmeyer Park
T
PUBLIC ELEMENTARY PARKS & RECREATION construction in joint efforts with
SCHOOL (K-5) WITHIN developers. The 2017 CIP (Capital
VILLAGE The parks, recreational facilities and Improvement Plan) includes
open spaces shown in the table approximately 11 projects related to
• Spring Road Elementary (within on the following page are located pond maintenance or construction
the Neenah Joint School District), within the Village. In total there are between 2017 and 2021.
located at 1191 County Road II, over 260 acres of public park and
built in 1936 open space in the Village. The Village also encourages
innovative ways to manage
PRIVATE SCHOOLS WITHIN The map on page A-29 displays the stormwater. For example, if
VILLAGE neighborhoods in the Village that businesses install some type of
are within a quarter-mile of a school pervious pavement, they get a
• New Hope Christian School or park. reduction in their stormwater utility
(preschool - 8th grade), located at charge.
1850 American Drive, built in 2002 UTILITIES & SERVICES
• St. Mary Middle School, located at The Village created a Stormwater
1050 Zephyr Drive, built in 2015 STORMWATER Utility in 2009 in order to better
• St. Mary High School, located at MANAGEMENT manage stormwater and create a
1050 Zephyr Drive, built in 1996 revenue source to meet the WDNR
The Village also maintains a full mandates for stormwater particulate
HIGHER EDUCATION stormwater system including reduction. The Stormwater Utility
FACILITIES stormwater mains and laterals. The charges an ERU (Equivalent
Village has seven ponds, three on Residential Unit) fee. An ERU is
There are three higher education the east side of Little Lake Butte classified as an average single-
facilities located near the Village of des Morts and four on the west family home lot consisting of 4,177
Fox Crossing: side. The Village contracts with a square feet of impervious area. The
pond maintenance company to current fee is $100 per ERU. Every
• Fox Valley Technical College, maintain many of its ponds and single-family home lot is charged 1
located in Appleton has an established program for ERU per year. The ERU is used as a
• Lawrence University, located in maintenance and inspection. All multiplier for all other commercial
Appleton new subdivisions within the Village and industrial development with
• University of Wisconsin - Fox require curb, gutters and ponds. impervious surface. Vacant parcels
Valley, located in Menasha are charged 0.25 ERU.
The Village is working with WisDOT
CHILD CARE FACILITIES to incorporate stormwater ponds as The Village has an MS4 permit from
part of the expansion of I-41 and US WDNR which requires multiple
There are two licensed childcare 10 and US 441. There are additional methods to minimize the impact
providers in Fox Crossing and joint ponds either planned or under of stormwater pollution. The
numerous located throughout the
Fox Cities (see table on the right). Licensed Child Care Facilities in Fox Crossing
Source: Wisconsin Department of Children and Families
Facility Class Capacity Age Served

A Child's Imagination Inc Licensed Group 120 6 weeks - 13 years
Twinkeling Stars Child Care Licensed Family 8 6 weeks - 11 years
Park Facilities in Fox Crossing, 2017
Source: Village of Fox Crossing Parks and Recreation website
Name Size Amenities

Anunson Farm Park 3.5 Undeveloped - projected to include open space, a play area and small basketball court
Butte des Morts 1.6 Natural area, trail and playground
Ice rink, tennis court with pickle ball lines and half court for basketball, group fitness
Fritsch Park 18.5 area, pavilion with kitchen, picnic tables and warming shelter, playground equipment,
restrooms, sledding hill, athletic fields, ping pong and walking trails
Boat launch, boat wash station, picnic tables, grills, playground equipment, restrooms and
Fritse Park/Rydell 15.3
sledding hill
Gant Park 1.1 Undeveloped
Glenview Park 0.6 Playground, picnic tables and grills
Kippenhan Park 0.3 Playground, picnic tables and grills
Meadow Heights Park 0.2 Tot-lot with climbers and slides
Baseballs/softball fields, disc golf course, wooded natural area with trails, pavilions with
O'Hauser Park (north/south) 64.4 kitchens, picnic tables, grills, restrooms, playground, sledding hill, soccer field, tennis
courts and volleyball court
Baseball fields, basketball court, neighborhood connecting trail, picnic tables, grills,
Palisades Park 14.9
restrooms, tennis courts, volleyball court, tot-lot play area and gazebo
Roy Kuehn 0.2 Playground and sandbox
Basketball hoop, pavilion with kitchen, restrooms, picnic tables, grills, playground
Schildt Park 10.0
equipment, volleyball court, trail, and 30 community garden plots
Strohmeyer Park 1.4 Playground and basketball court
Westfield Park 0.5 Playground equipment
Tree house themed playground equipment with a climbing wall and rock feature, pavilion,
Wittmann Park 25.0
restrooms, kitchen, soccer storage, tennis/pickleball/basketball courts, trail.
Woodland Prairie Park 63.0 Undeveloped
Annex Lane 0.6 Open space
Brighton Beach Open Space 9.0 Open space
Gateway Meadows Open
13.6 Open space
Space
High Plain Meadows Open
0.7 Open space
Space
Stroebe-Pearl-Cox Open
12.3 Open space
Space
Wildlife Heights Open Space 4.1 Open space

Village couples its public education gallons is 3,349,000. The Village plans TELECOMMUNICATIONS
and outreach about stormwater to replace old water mains and has FACILITIES
with the Northeast Wisconsin Storm included approximately $4.3 million
Water Consortium (NEWSC). The dollars in water main projects in its Spectrum and AT&T U-verse currently
Village conducts an annual Summer 2017-2021 CIP. provide cable to the Village. There are
Safety Night, distributes promotional 11 cellular towers primarily on water
materials and talks to residents and The west side system consists of four towers or on Village property. Currently
visitors about stormwater. The Village wells, two treatment plants, two one there are two additional towers being
also provides street sweeping and leaf million gallon reservoirs and two installed in the right-of-way.
pickup. 300,000 gallon water towers.
GAS & POWER
WASTE WATER & SANITARY The east side system consists of two
SEWER SYSTEM wells, a treatment plant, a one-million Electrical power and gas are provided
gallon reservoir, one 300,000 gallon by We Energies to residents on the
The Village of Fox Crossing does not water tower and a metering station. west side of the Village. East side
have its own treatment plant. The east Fifty percent of water for the east side residents' electrical power is provided
side of Little Lake Butte des Morts of Fox Crossing is purchased from by Menasha Utilities and gas is
is served by the Neenah Menasha the City of Menasha and blended in provided by We Energies.
Sewage Treatment Plant. The average the reservoir with the Village's well
wastewater flow in gallons per day water. The City of Menasha's water
is 219,000 from the east side. The service area on the east side is near
west side is treated by Fox West the lakeshore and USH 10.
Sewage Treatment Plant. The average
wastewater flow in gallons per day SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING
is 278,000 from the west side. Both FACILITIES
plants are shared plants with some
restrictions on capacity and have Municipal solid waste services for
ongoing programs to replace aging garbage and recycling pickup are
sewer mains and reduce infiltration. provided to Village residents through
Advanced Disposal, a private hauler.
The only private sewage treatment in Solid waste is disposed of at the
the Village is for a few single-family Winnebago County Landfill and
homes not yet connected to the recycling is taken to the Tri-County
Village system. Recycling Facility in Outagamie
County. There are no open landfills
The only elevation limit for sewer within the Village, however the
service is just west of State Road 76, Municipal Complex is located on the
which would require a lift station. one closed landfill within the Village.
WATER SUPPLY The Village also holds an electronics

recycling event twice a year in April
The Village of Fox Crossing is served and October where residents can
by several wells and water towers. drop electronics off at the Municipal
The annual number of gallons used Complex. The Village works with
in Fox Crossing is 866,870,000 gallons. Recycle That Stuff to make the event
The average daily gallons used is possible.
2,374,000 gallons and the high daily
C O MMU N I T Y C H ARACTE R
CULTURAL RESOURCES The following historic marker is drinking among high schoolers
located within the Village: between 2009 and 2015. Also,
In late 2016, the Town of Menasha the percentage of high schoolers
incorporated to become the Village • Fox-Irish Cemetery, located at who have attempted suicide
of Fox Crossing. Since its foundation 9088 Clayton Avenue (12%) compared to those who
in the mid 19th century, the Town of have seriously considered
Menasha had been occupied almost STATE & NATIONAL suicide (15.3%) seems high
exclusively by farms. However, the REGISTER OF HISTORIC when viewed alongside the 2013
early metropolitan Fox Valley area PLACES state and national average. In
soon became known for the lumber 2013, 13.2% of Wisconsin high
business and the paper mill industry There are no registered State or schoolers considered suicide,
which spurred the Village to become National Historic Places within the with 6% attempting suicide.
more urbanized in the 1940s. After Village of Fox Crossing. Nationally, 17% high schoolers
this, the population of the Village considered suicide while 8%
continued to increase until it became REGIONAL PRIORITIES attempted suicide. These trends
a suburban bedroom community in may highlight a need for more
between Appleton and Menasha. The 2016 Fox Cities LIFE (Leading intervention programs and
Eventually more homeowners and Indicators for Excellence) Study supportive services in the Fox
corporations began to locate in the provides a look at quality of life Cities.
Village. In turn, the Village invested in the Fox Cities area through a
in municipal services beyond data-focused overview. As part of • Student Performance - Student
the scope of most towns, which the study, communities of the Fox performance in the Fox Cities is
facilitated additional increases Cities came together and identified above the state average despite
in homeowners and businesses priorities for the region. The growing economic challenges as
coming to the community. following were identified: measured by free and reduced
lunch participation rates. The
The physical layout of the Village • Poverty - While there appears Fox Cities has a 40% reading
of Fox Crossing has been heavily to be no significant climb in proficiency and just over 50%
influenced by the presence of Lake child and overall poverty rates math proficiency. The gap is
Butte des Morts. The lake splits the in the past three years, there closing between economically
community into a west side and an has been a steady increase in disadvantaged and non-
east side, which are connected by Wisconsin Works (W-2) program economically disadvantaged
the Roland Kampo Bridge. participants, alongside an students, however the gap
increase in the percentage of remains significant.
HISTORICAL RESOURCES the population receiving food
stamps. Additionally, slow • Youth Safety - In the Fox Cities,
WISCONSIN HISTORICAL growth in household income 27% of high schoolers face
MARKERS alongside an increase in median bullying at school and 18% have
gross rent in the Fox Cities' experienced electronic bullying.
Wisconsin Historical Markers counties suggests an increase in Both rates are higher than the
identify, commemorate and honor the working poor, who may be state and national averages.
the important people, places, and marginally above the poverty Additionally, while child abuse
events that have contributed to threshold, but are susceptible to and neglect rates decreased,
the state’s heritage. The Wisconsin food insecurity. they exceeded the state average
Historical Society’s Division of in Outagamie and Winnebago
Historic Preservation administers • Youth Health - The region Counties. Calumet County is well
the Historical Markers Program. saw a reduction in alcohol below the state average.
consumption and binge

CO L L A B O R AT I O N & P ARTN E RSHIP S
EXISTING AREAS OF POTENTIAL AREAS OF boundary agreements with the

COLLABORATION COLLABORATION Towns of Clayton, Grand Chute and
Greenville.
The table below lists existing areas As listed in th table below, the Village
of collaboration between Fox has estsablished several boundary Fox Crossing also has interest in a
Crossing and other local units of agreements with surrounding regional official mapping process
government. communities. At some point in the to identify and establish a well
future corrdination may be needed connected regional road and bike
in order to update the Village's facility network.
existing boundary agreements. The
Village may also consider preparing
Local Unit of Government Existing Cooperation Efforts

City of Neenah Boundary agreement
Town of Neenah Boundary agreement
City of Menasha Intergovernmental agreement
City of Appleton Intergovernmental agreement
City of Neenah Utility agreement
Town of Neenah Utility agreement
Town of Neenah Automatic aid agreement
Town of Grand Chute Automatic aid agreement
Town of Greenville Automatic aid agreement
Clayton/Winchester Automatic aid agreement
Executive Board of MABAS MABAS agreement
Winnebago County & City of Menasha Traffic jurisdiction boundaries on State Highway 441
Winnebago County 911 Emergency System
Winnebago County Transaction Information for the Management of Enforcement System
Agency Agreement
Cities of Appleton, Kaukauna, Menasha and Neenah; Fox Valley Mutual Aid Agreement
Town of Grand Chute; and Villages of Combined
Locks, Kimberly and Little Chute
Counties of Winnebago, Outagamie, Fond du Lac, Lake Winnebago Area MEG Drug Unit Agreement
and Calumet; Cities of Oshkosh, Appleton, Fond du
Lac, Neenah, New London, Menasha and Kaukauna;
and Town of Grand Chute
L A N D U SE
EXISTING & PROJECTED There are several limitations to The table below provides the
LAND USE building development (i.e. steep projected land use needs of the
slopes, wetlands, and floodplain), Village in five year increments
The Village of Fox Crossing includes reducing the potential for future through 2035. Note: Residential
approximately 8,400 acres. development. In total there are use projections were calculated by
Residential makes up a quarter of approximately 1,323 acres of land multiplying the change in projected
the Village, including 23% of which is with development limitations (16% housing units by the minimum
single family lots. Overall developed of the Village), including 710 acres residential lot size, and then added
lands (i.e. commercial, institutional, of water resources. Therefore, there to the existing residential acreage.
manufacturing, transportation and is roughly 1,000 acres that remain Projections for commercial and
residential) make up 55% of the “developable” (free of development manufacturing acreage assume that
Village. Refer to the map on page limitations). these land uses will grow at a similar
A-36. rate to the current proportion of
commercial or manufacturing land
to residential land (i.e. maintaining
Existing Land Uses within the Village status quo). Actual needs may differ
Source: MSA Mapping based on market conditions and the
land use policies of the Village.
Acres %
Agricultural 197.1 2%
Open Space 1,427.0 17%
Development Limitation within the Village
Single Family Res 1,917.6 23% Source: MSA Mapping
Multi-Family 206.8 2%
Acres %
Commercial 276.0 3%
Developed 6,070.7 72%
Industrial 1,021.5 12%
Development
Institutional Facilties 255.5 3% Limitations 1,323.3 16%
Recreational Facilities 1,438.2 17% Developable 1,010.8 12%
Transportation 955.1 11% Total 8,404.7 100%
Water 710.0 8%
Total 8,404.7 100%

Projected Land Use Needs, 2015-2035
Source: DOA and MSA Projections
Projected Land Demand * 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 20 Yr Change

Population 18,950 20,070 21,080 22,020 22,680 3,730
Household Size 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.28 2.27 -0.05
Housing Units 8,605 9,160 9,669 10,151 10,508 1,902
Residential (acres) 2,124 2,241 2,348 2,449 2,524 400
Commercial (acres) 276 291 289 288 284 8
Manufacturing (acres) 1,021 1,077 1,129 1,178 1,214 192
Undeveloped Land (acres) 1,011 823 667 518 411 -600.0
* Based on minimum residential lot size of 0.21 acres or 9,000 square feet for a single-family residence (Village Zoning Code R-2 District - Sewered)

Existing Land Use Map
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
N
BA
DG
ER
N MEADE ST
Exist
N DREW ST
AV
W PACKARD ST
N
MALL
DR
W COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV
S LAW E S T
City of
W SPENCER ST
Appleton
G rand C hute
S O NE
ß !
"
#
S LYNNDALE DR
CB
41
Town of
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Com
A ID
S M EM O RIAL DR
S CASALOMA DR
T AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
EC
ST
P
OS
ek
PR
re
W
E FREMONT ST
Mud C
City
er
of Appleton
v
Ri
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV W PRO S PECT AV E
RD
NORTHERN
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
IRISH RD
VALLEY RD
N DR
Village of /
.
N MEADE ST
Existing Land Use

N DREW ST
10
%
¾ 441
%
¾ 441
D
Fox Crossing
EA CH R
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
E SHADY LN
S LAW E S T
Mor es
RE
MOR
S HO
e D
ts
S
KE
E DE
STEAD DR
L it t le
S O NE
LA
B UTT
N MASON ST
N DIVISION ST
N
Comprehensive Plan
ID
BA
WEST AMERICAN DR
A
A IR
DG

E SOUTH RIVER ST PO
ST
ER
RT
N MEADE ST
Existing Land Use

N DREW ST
AV
RD
2018-2038 /
.
RD
W PACKARD ST
ST
10
N
TO
E FREMONT ST
MELISS A
N
LE
MALL
City
P
DR
AP
W COLLEGE AV NINTH ST
!
"
#
W COLLEGE AV
of Appleton
LONDON ST
JACOBSEN RD
41
FAIRVIEW RD
S LAW E S T
RD
OC
City of
/
.
W
TO
NI
114
IRISH RD
Village
W SPENCER ST
MA
Appleton SEVENTH ST
G rand C hute
S O NE
"
!
#
S LYNNDALE DR
of Harrison
TAYCO ST
RD
DR
41
MILWAUKEE ST
Town of
RACINE ST
K
AN
City of
D AN
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
Comprehensive Plan
ID
I PL
L ERS R C
A
R
S M EM O RIAL DR
S CASALOMA DR
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST E
CT
AM
Menasha
ST
PE
ß
CB
OS
Ca lu m et Cou nty
2018-2038
ek
THIRD ST
PR
ES
EY RD
EH
re
AK
City of
W
E FREMONT ST
Existing Land Use
Mud C
NL
Village of Fox Crossing City

%
¾ 441 Mena sha Chann el Menasha
ßII
er
of Appleton Single Family Residential

v
Ri
y
N GREEN BAY RD
A rr Fox
ow
Planning Area ß
h
O
NAYMUT ST
W PRO S PECT AV E
Multi-Family
ea
W PROSPECT AV
y 76
RD
%
¾
d R
To w n o f
NORTHERN
Clayton
i v er
Commercial
N MASON ST
County
N DIVISION ST
N
NICOLET BLVD
BA
1ST ST
3RD ST
DG
AM
COLD SPRING RD
City of Industrial
ERERICA N DR
N MEADE ST
% Existing Land
% Use
N DREW ST
AV
VALLEY RD MAIN ST
City of Appleton
Neenah
W PACKARD ST
S GREEN BAY RD
age of /
.
10
¾441
¾ 441 Village of Fox Crossing Institutional Facilities
City of Menasha E Lake
D
HARRISON ST
Crossing City of
LARSEN RD W
CH R
W COLLEGE AV IS
Non-Irrigated Cropland
CO
S LAW E S T
NS Winnebago
Planning Area Neenah
EA
City of
IN
City of Neenah
M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP) AV
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
TULLAR RD
E
W SPENCER ST
Mor es
Appleton Other Open Land

Data Sources:
RE
MOR
u g ST
OAK ST
/
.
AV
S O NE
S HO
Municipal Boundaries: W
Village of Harrison
S lo L A K E
e D
S LYNNDALE DR
NE
114
h
ts
ON
Village
S
EC
S COMMERCIAL ST
and Outagamie Counties

County
KE
E DE
NN
Transportation
STEAD DR
WI
L it t le
Street Centerlines: Winne

LA
S BLU MND DR
Comprehensive Plan
ID
of Harrison
W
S PARK AVE
B UTT
CONGRESS ST
A
S M EM O RIAL DR
T AV
EC
E SOUTH RIVER ST RD Outagamie Counties.
ST
ah
GE
Town
P
Existing Land Use: Winne
Recreational Facilities
OS
RICAN DR ID
KR
en
2018-2038 City of Appleton

A IR
(2010) and East Central W
PR
A
PO
O
Ne
RT
Planning Commission (O
W
E FREMONT ST RD
Ca lu m et Cou nty
General Woodlands
Calumet Counties, 2015)
RD
ST
Waterbody City City of Menasha

N
TO
d Use
MELISS A
er
of Appleton
v
LE
Ri
ß Water
P
JJ
AP
Fox
City of Neenah
NINTH ST
e Family Residential !
"
# Perennial Stream/River
LONDON ST
N RD
41 OC
RD
/
.
W
TO
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_ExistingLandUse.mxd
Village of Harrison
NI
114
Village
MA
-Family Intermittent Stream/Rive

SEVENTH ST
of Harrison
TAYCO ST
RD
DR
MILWAUKEE ST
RACINE ST
NK
mercial Artificial Path/Ditch
City of Town
D AN
A
I PL
L ERS R C
R VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P)
E VALLEY RD
AM
Menasha
trial
Ca lu m et Cou nty
/
.
T
THIRD ST
%
¾ Village of Fox Crossing
ES
10 441
Waterbody
EH
%
¾ 441
AK
City of Existing Land Use

NL
utional Facilities Mena sha Chann el Menasha

Planning
Single AreaResidential
Family
DR
oIrrigated Cropland
N GREEN BAY RD
Mor es
RE
S HO
NAYMUT ST
Multi-Family
D
ts
Open Land Data Sources:

County
KE
STEAD DR
u t te
LA

Village of Fox Crossing Commercial Artificial Path/Ditch
portation
NICOLET BLVD
1ST ST
City of Appleton
AI
3RD ST
Outagamie Counties.RP O
City of Industrial
RT
Existing Land Use: Winnebago
RD County
ational Facilities
MAIN ST
(2010) and East Central Wisconsin Regional
RD
Neenah
ST
City of Menasha
S GREEN BAY RD
Planning Commission (Outagamie and

N
Institutional Facilities
TO
MELISS A
ral Woodlands
Calumet Counties, 2015).
PLE
Lake
AP
E
City of Neenah
HARRISON ST
City of
NINTH ST W
IS
Non-Irrigated Cropland
CO
LONDON ST
RD NS Winnebago
r OC
Neenah
0 0.35 0.7 Miles
IN
/
.
W AV
TO
Village of Harrison
TULLAR RD
NI E
114
Village
MA
Other Open Land Data Sources:

u g ST
OAK ST
SEVENTH ST E
AV
Print Date: 6/6/2018 Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet
S lo L A K E

NE
of Harrison
h
ON
TAYCO ST
EC D
S COMMERCIAL ST

MILWAUKEE ST
KR
RACINE ST
NN
Transportation
WI AN
W PL
Town Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and
S PARK AVE
CONGRESS ST
Outagamie Counties.
ah
Existing Land Use: Winnebago County

Recreational Facilities
Ca lu m et Cou nty
en
THIRD ST
(2010) and East Central Wisconsin Regional
Waterbody
Ne
Planning Commission (Outagamie and

City of Existing Land Use General Woodlands
Calumet Counties, 2015).
Mena sha Chann el Menasha
A-36 V i l l a g e o Single
f FFamily
o x Residential
C r o s s i n g | C Water
oPerennial
m p Stream/River
rehensive Plan 0 0.35 0.7 Miles
NAYMUT ST
Multi-Family Intermittent Stream/Rive Print Date: 6/6/2018
NICOLET BLVD Commercial Artificial Path/Ditch

1ST ST
RD ST
REDEVELOPMENT In addition to properties with known property value ratios; however,
OPPORTUNITIES contamination history, another this is due to very high land values
indicator of potential redevelopment associated with the lake front
Redevelopment opportunities opportunities is the assessment value properties and does not necessarily
are buildings or parcels that have of existing developed properties. indicat low property utilization.
fallen into disrepair and are no The maps on pages A-38 through
longer contributing positively to A-40 illustrate the ratio of assessed ZONING
the social or economic life of the improvement values to land values
Village. Redevelopment is typically for properties classified as Residential Land development and building
synonymous with commercial or (Class 1), Commercial (Class 2), and activity within the Village are subject
industrial infill development. Manufacturing (Class 3). In general, to the Village’s Zoning Ordinance
properties where the value of the (Chapter 31). Within the Village,
CONTAMINATED SITES improvements on the property requests for zoning amendments
are equal to or less than double are reviewed and approved by the
The Bureau of Remediation the land value indicate properties Planning Commission and Village
and R edevelopment within that may be under utilized and Board. Existing zoning is shown on
the Wisconsin Department of may be considered candidates for the map on page A-41.
Natural Resources oversees the redevelopment. The maps illustrate
investigation and cleanup of the assessment ratios for these three A portion of the Village also falls
environmental contamination and classes of properties as of year 2015. within Outagamie County's Airport
the redevelopment of contaminated In 2015 the average rato for all Class Overlay Zoning Ordinance for the
properties. The Remediation and 1 properties in the Village was 3.25, Appleton International Airport,
Redevelopment Tracking System 4.52 for Class 2 properties, and 4.68 which includes additional zoning
(BRRTS) provide access to information for Class 3 properties. The maps on regulations affecting land use and
on incidents (“Activities”) that pages A-38 through A-40 illustrate development. Refer to the map on
contaminated soil or groundwater. properties that are less than 75% of page A-42.
These activities include spills, leaks, these averages.
other cleanups and sites where no PLAT REVIEW
action was needed. Based on the Note, that a low property value ratio
BRRTS database, there are five “Open” does not always indicate under Land divisions and subdivisons of
sites within the Village. Open sites are utilized propeties. For example, many property within the Village and it’s
those in need of cleanup or where of the Class 1 properties adjacent to surrounding extraterritorial plat review
cleanup is underway. Little Lake Butte de Morts have low jurisdiction are subject to the Village’s
Land Division Ordinance (Chapter 6). The
Contaminated Sites in Fox Crossing boundaries of the Village’s extraterritorial
Source: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources plat review jurisdiction, at the time this
plan was adopted, is shown on the map
Activity # Name Address Status
on page A-43.
02-71-563270 Neenah Cty Historic Fill Green Bay Rd and Open ERP
Chapman Ave
02-71-536999 Busy Beas Drycleaners 1077 Racine St Open ERP
02-71-097961 William Tiede & Sons 672 Valley Rd Open ERP
02-71-563809 Foc River Tool Co 1084 Valley Rd Open ERP
03-71-576776 Mikes Cycle Shop Inc 1114 Valley Rd Open LUST
Status: Environmental Remediation Program (ERP), Leaking Underground Storage

Tank (LUST)

Class 1 Property Value Ratios
S LYNNDALE DR
Redeve
S O NE
Grand Chute
IDA
AV
To w n o f
S BLU MND DR
ß
S ME M ORIAL DR
Oppo
S CASALOM A DR
ST
CT
S NICOLET RD
CB
"
!
#
PE
41
OS
PR
City of
W
Appleton W SEYMOUR ST
Class 1 P
River
Outagamie County
Compre
F ox
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W PROSPECT AVE
201
W CA LUME T S T
D
NORTHERN R
C re ek
d
Mu
A ME RICAN
COLD SPRING RD

IRISH RD
#3
DR
.
/
10
%¾
¾ % 441 441
Redevelopment
%
¾441
S O NE

D
HR
IDA
E AC
Opportunities
Planning Area
ST
TS B
DR
MOR
ORE
County Line
S
E DE
SH
Class 1 Properties KE
STEAD DR
BUTT
LA
City of Appleton
UR ST
W EST AMERICAN DR
Little AIRPORT RD
Lake Butte City of Menasha
Comprehensive Plan

#1 Des Morts City of Neenah
RD
N
ST
TO
2018-2038
ET S T
/
.
LE
10 Village of Harrison
MELISSA
P
AP
"
!
# Town Line
#2 NINTH ST
FAIRVIEW RD JACOBSEN RD 41 OC
RD
OW
LONDON ST
NIT
MA
Interstate Highway
/
.
114
JA
IRISH RD
COLD SPRING RD
CO
US Highway
BS
SEVENTH ST
EN
%¾
¾ % 441 441
MILWAUKEE ST
RD
State Highway
TAYCO ST
RD
Village of
DR
NK
RACINE ST
A
N
PL
Village of Fox Crossing Property Value Ratio*
A
I
C
Harrison County Hwy

R
E
M
A
RS RD
Class 1 ß
CB Local Road
City of
W inneba go C ou nty
Planning Area THIRD ST
T
LE
Ca lu m et Cou nty
ES
0.00
Menasha
EH
AK
Waterbody
NL
County Line 0.01 - 1.00

Me n a s h l
a C h a nn e
1.01 - 2.00 Perennial Stream/Rive
City
W SPENCER ST of Appleton ß
II
City of Menasha 2.01 - 2.50

N GREEN BAY RD
S LYNNDALE DR
Redevelopment
S O NE
ß *Ratio of Improveme
NAYMUT ST
2.51 - 16.67 O
City of Neenah
Assessment Value
IDA
AV
properties in th
Village of Harrison
S ME M ORIAL DR
Opportunities
ST
To w n o f CT
NICOLET BLVD
PE
OS
1ST ST
Clayton
Lake
3RD ST
PR
Town Line
T
LS
City of
W
C IA
Winnebago
Class
" 1 Properties
E FOREST AVE
ER
Appleton Data Sources:

MM
Interstate Highway
.
/ !
#
CO
W SEYMOUR ST MA Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Ca

114 41
City of
IN
N
ST and Outagamie Counties.

US Highway
ST
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calum

Neenah
ST
S GREEN BAY RD
CH
S LAKE ST
River
ST
Outagamie Counties.
Comprehensive Plan
F ox
K
l oug h
OA
UR
State Highway
LARSEN RD
L
HARRISON ST
Assessment Values (2015).

CIA
Village of
S CH
ER
CT AVE
M
Harrison
2018-2038
County Hwy
W CA LUME T S T E
M
ah S
W
S CO
WA IS
Cre ek S HIN
CO
NS
IN
Local Road
E RD GT
IDG en
ON AV
KR E
OA
Ne AV
E
Ca lu m et Cou nty
PrintedWaterbody
By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_RedevelopmentOpportunities_Class1.mxd
/
.
10
%¾
¾ %441 441
%
¾441
*Ratio of Improvement Assessment Value over Land Village of Fox Crossing Property Value Ratio*
Assessment Value. Average value of all Class 1
Class 1
properties in the Village in 2015 was 3.25
Planning Area
0.00
DR
ORE

SH
KE

STEAD DR
LA
Data Sources:
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet City of Appleton
1.01 - 2.00
AIRPORT RD Winnebago County, WI
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and City of Menasha 2.01 - 2.50
Outagamie Counties.
2.51 - 16.67

City of Neenah
RD
N
ST
TO
LE
Village of Harrison Tax Incremental District (TID)

MELISSA
P
AP
0 0.35 0.7 Miles

NINTH ST
RD
Town Line
C
WO
LONDON ST
O
NIT
MA
Interstate Highway
/
.
114
SEVENTH ST US Highway
MILWAUKEE ST
RD State Highway
NK
Village of
RACINE ST
A
PL
A-38 V i l l a g e o f F o x Harrison
Crossing | Comprehensive Plan County Hwy
Local Road
City of
ag o C o u n t y
THIRD ST
et County
Menasha
Waterbody
Me n a s h l
a C h a nn e
S LYNNDALE DR
Red
S O NE
Grand Chute
IDA
AV
To w n o f
S BLU MND DR
ß
S ME M ORIAL DR
Op
S CASALOM A DR
ST
CT
S NICOLET RD
CB
"
!
#
PE
41
OS
PR
City of
W
Class
River
Outagamie County
Com
F ox
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W PROSPECT AVE
W CA LUME T S T
D
NORTHERN R
C re ek
d
Mu
A ME RICAN
COLD SPRING RD

IRISH RD
#3
DR
.
/
10
%¾
¾ % 441 441
Redevelopment
%
¾441
S O NE
Village of Fox
D
HR
IDA
B E AC MIDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP)
Opportunities
Planning Are
ST
RTS
DR
S MO
ORE
County Line
E DE
SH
Class 2 Properties
KE
STEAD DR
BUTT
LA
W SEYMOUR ST
City of Appleto
W EST AMERICAN DR
Little AIRPORT RD
Lake Butte City of Menash
Comprehensive Plan

RD
N
ST
TO
2018-2038
W CA LUME T S T
/
.
LE
10 Village of Harr
MELISSA
P
AP
"
!
# Town Line
#2 NINTH ST
RD
OW
LONDON ST
NIT
MA
Interstate High
EY RD
/
.
114
JA
IRISH RD
COLD SPRING RD
CO
US Highway
BS
SEVENTH ST
EN
%¾
¾ % 441 441
MILWAUKEE ST
RD
State Highway
TAYCO ST
RD
Village of
DR
NK
RACINE ST
A
N
PL
A
I
C
Harrison County Hwy

R
E
M
A
RS RD
Class 2 ß
CB Local Road
City of
T
LE
Ca lu m et Cou nty
ES
0.00
Menasha
EH
AK
Waterbody
NL

Me n a s h l
STEAD DR
a C h a nn e
1.01 - 2.00 II Perennial Stre
City
W SPENCER ST of Appleton ß
N GREEN BAY RD
S LYNNDALE DR
Redevelopment
S O NE
ß *Ratio of Im
NAYMUT ST
3.51 - 67.26 O
City of Neenah
Assessm
AID
AV
prope
S BLU MND DR
Village of Harrison
S ME M ORIAL DR
Opportunities
ST
To w n oROfSPE CT
NICOLET BLVD
1ST ST
Clayton
Lake
3RD ST
Town Line
T
P
LS
City of
W
C IA
Winnebago
Class
" 2 Properties
E FOREST AVE
ER
Appleton Data Sources:

MM
Interstate Highway
.
/ !
#
CO
W SEYMOUR ST MA Municipal Boundaries: Wi

114 41
City of
IN
N
ST and Outagamie Counties

US Highway
ST
Street Centerlines: Winne

Neenah
ST
S GREEN BAY RD
CH
S LAKE ST
River
ST
Outagamie Counties.
Comprehensive Plan
F ox
K
l oug h
OA
UR
State Highway
LARSEN RD
L
HARRISON ST
Assessment Values (2015)

CIA
Village of
S CH
ER
W PROSPECT AVE
M
Harrison
2018-2038
County Hwy
W CA LUME T S T E
M
ah S
W
S CO
WA IS
Cre ek S HIN
CO
NS
IN
Local Road
E RD GT
en
d
IDG
ON AV
KR
Mu
E
OA
Ne AV
E
Ca lu m et Cou nty
Waterbody
Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_RedevelopmentOpportunities_Class2.mxd
/
.
10
%¾
¾
441 441
%
%
¾441
*Ratio of Improvement Assessment Value over Land Village of Fox Crossing Property Value Ratio*
Assessment Value. Average value of all Class 2
Class 2
Planning Area
0.00
DR
ORE

SH
go
KE

STEAD DR
LA
Data Sources:
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet City of Appleton
1.01 - 2.00
AIRPORT RD Winnebago County, WI
Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and City of Menasha 2.01 - 3.50
Outagamie Counties.
3.51 - 67.26

City of Neenah
RD
N
ST
TO
LE

MELISSA
P
AP
0 0.35 0.7 Miles

NINTH ST
RD
Town Line
C
WO
LONDON ST
O
NIT
MA
Interstate Highway
/
.
114
MILWAUKEE ST
State Highway
TAYCO ST
RD
NK
Village of
RACINE ST
A
PL
Harrison County Hwy

Appendix A | Community Indicators Report
Local Road
A-39
City of
ag o C o u n t y
THIRD ST
et County
Menasha
Waterbody
Me n a s h l
a C h a nn e
S LYNNDALE DR
Redeve
S O NE
Grand Chute
IDA
AV
To w n o f
S BLU MND DR
ß
S ME M ORIAL DR
Oppo
S CASALOM A DR
ST
CT
S NICOLET RD
CB
"
!
#
PE
41
OS
PR
City of
W
Class 3 P
River
Outagamie County
Compre
F ox
WINNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W PROSPECT AVE
201
W CA LUME T S T
D
NORTHERN R
C re ek
d
Mu
A ME RICAN
COLD SPRING RD

IRISH RD
#3
DR
.
/
10
%¾
¾ % 441 441
Redevelopment
%
¾441
S O NE

D
HR
IDA
E AC
Opportunities
Planning Area
ST
TS B
DR
MOR
ORE
County Line
S
E DE
SH
Class 3 Properties KE
STEAD DR
BUTT
LA
City of Appleton
UR ST
W EST AMERICAN DR
Little AIRPORT RD
Lake Butte City of Menasha
Comprehensive Plan

RD
N
ST
TO
2018-2038
ET S T
/
.
LE
10 Village of Harrison
MELISSA
P
AP
"
!
# Town Line
#2 NINTH ST
RD
OW
LONDON ST
NIT
MA
Interstate Highway
/
.
114
JA
IRISH RD
COLD SPRING RD
CO
US Highway
BS
SEVENTH ST
EN
%¾
¾441 441
%
MILWAUKEE ST
RD
State Highway
TAYCO ST
RD
Village of
DR
NK
RACINE ST
A
N
PL
A
I
C
Harrison County Hwy

R
E
M
A
RS RD
Class 3 ß
CB Local Road
City of
T
LE
Ca lu m et Cou nty
ES
0.00
Menasha
EH
AK
Waterbody
NL

Me n a s h l
a C h a nn e
1.01 - 2.00 Perennial Stream/Rive
City of Appleton ß II
W SPENCER ST
N GREEN BAY RD
ß *Ratio of Improveme
NAYMUT ST
3.51 - 18.97 O
S LYNNDALE DR
Redevelopment
City of Neenah
S O NE
Assessment Value
properties in th
Village of HarrisonV Tax Incremental District (TID)

ID
NICOLET BLVD
A
A
S ME M ORIAL DR
Opportunities
ST
CT
1ST ST
To w n o f
Clayton
PE
Lake
3RD ST
Town Line
T
LS
OS
C IA
PR
E FOREST AVE Winnebago

ER
City of
W
Class!
"3 Properties
Data Sources:
MM
Interstate Highway
.
/ #
CO
Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Ca

Appleton
MA
114 41
City of
IN
N
W SEYMOUR ST ST and Outagamie Counties.

US Highway
ST

Neenah
ST
S GREEN BAY RD
CH
S LAKE ST
ST
Outagamie Counties.
K
l oug h
OA
UR
State Highway
LARSEN RD
L
HARRISON ST

CIA
Village of
S CH
River
Comprehensive Plan
F ox
ER
M
Harrison County Hwy

E
M
ah S
VE W
S CO
WA IS
CO
2018-2038
W CA LUME T S T S HIN NS
IN
Local Road
GE RD GT
ek en
RID ON AV
K E
OA
Ne AV
E
Ca lu m et Cou nty
PrintedWaterbody
By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_RedevelopmentOpportunities_Class3.mxd

/
.
10
%¾
¾441 441
%
*Ratio of Improvement Assessment Value over Land
%
¾441
Assessment Value. Average value of all Class 3 Village of Fox Crossing Property Value Ratio*
Class 3
Planning Area
0.00
DR
ORE
County Line
Data Sources: Village of Fox Crossing 0.01 - 1.00
STEAD DR

and Outagamie Counties. Winnebago County, WI 1.01 - 2.00
City of Appleton
Street Centerlines: Winnebago,
AIRPORT RD Calumet and
Outagamie Counties.
3.51 - 18.97
City of Neenah
RD
N
ST
TO
LE

MELISSA
0 0.35 0.7 Miles

P
AP
NINTH ST
D Print Date: 6/6/2018 Town Line
O CR
OW
LONDON ST
NIT
MA
Interstate Highway
.
/
114
MILWAUKEE ST
RD State Highway
NK
Village of
RACINE ST
PL
Harrison County Hwy
Local Road
City of
o County
THIRD ST
County
Menasha
Waterbody
Me n a s h l
a C h a nn e
Unofficial Zoning Map
N LINW OOD AV
N D IVISION ST
N DREW ST
N MEADE ST
Zoning T. Greenville & Grand Chute
W PACKARD ST
CR: Regional Com
N
Unoffic
AD: Airport Dist IND: Industrial
MALL
DR
W COLLEGE AV
W COLLEGE AV
AGD: General Ag R-4: Multi-Family Res Dist
S LAWE S T
C: General Com RMF: Multi-Family Res
W SPENCER ST
"
!
#
G rand C hute
S LYNNDALE DR
41 C-2: Office Com Dist RSF: Single Family Res
Greenville
ß
Town of
d Cr ee k
CB
To w n o f
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
CL: Local Com RTF: Two Family Res
S M EM O RIAL DR
S CASALOMA DR
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
S
T
EC
ONE
City of
Compre
P
CP: Planned Com
OS
u
IDA S T
M
PR
Appleton
E FREMONT ST
W
201
Outagamie County
W INNEGAMIE DR
ß
BB
Winneb ago County
W PROSPECT AV
W P ROSPECT AVE
NORTHERN RD
A M ERICA
COLD SPRING RD
er
IRISH RD
Riv
VALLEY RD
N DREW ST
N MEADE ST
Com
N DR
/
.
F ox
10
%
¾
441
%
¾ 441
Unofficial Zoning
al
D
EA CH R
mily Res Dist
TS B
S LAWE S T
Bu tt La ke
DR
E SHADY LN
Mor es
RE
Villa
MOR
amily Res 76
%
¾
S HO
e D
ts
S
KE
E DE
amily Res
STEAD DR
L it t le
LA
B UTT
Plan
mily Res
UTH RIVER ST
N LINW OOD AV
N D IVISION ST
W EST AMERICAN DR
N DREW ST
N MEADE ST
Zoning T. Greenville & Grand Chute CR: Regional Com

AIR
W PACKARD ST

PO
Comprehensive Plan
RT
RD
Cou
N
Unofficial
# Zoning
AD: Airport Dist IND: Industrial
MALL
RD
!
" /
.
ST
MONT ST
10
N
DR
V
41
TO
2018-2038
MELISSA
W COLLEGE AV
R-4: Multi-Family Res Dist
LE
AGD: General Ag
S LAWE S T
P
AP
City
NINTH ST
RMF: Multi-Family Res
LONDON ST
JACOBSEN RD
C: General Com
W SPENCER ST FAIRVIEW RD
RD
W OC
"
!
#
TO
/
. City
NI
S LYNNDALE DR
RSF: Single Family Res

IRISH RD
41 C-2: Office Com Dist Village 114
MA
d Cr ee k
SEVENTH ST
S NICOLET RD
S BLU MND DR
RTF: Two Family Res of Harrison

TAYCO ST
CL: Local Com

S M EM O RIAL DR
S CASALOMA DR
City
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST RD
R
MILWAUKEE ST
S
RACINE ST
D
NK
T
City of
AN
A
EC
PL
ONE
IC
City of
Comprehensive Plan
R
P
CP: Planned Com

E
OS
u
IDA S T
W in n eba g o C o u n t y
AM
Menasha Villa
M
ß
R S RD
PR
CB
Appleton
E FREMONT ST
Ca lu m et Cou nty
THIRD ST
T
W
ES
2018-2038
LE
AK
EH
NL
%
¾441
Mena sha Chann el Tow
W P ROSPECT AVE
ßII
N GREEN BAY RD
ß Parc
NORTHERN RD
O
NAYMUT ST

Zoning Fox Crossing
76
%
¾
A M ERICA
N LINW OOD AV
N D IVISION ST
Wat
N DREW ST
er
N MEADE ST
Zoning T. Greenville & Grand Chute CR: Regional Com Zoning T. Clayton Zoning T. Neenah
1ST ST
A-2: General Agriculture

NICOLET BLVD
Planning Area
W PACKARD ST VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P)
Riv
VALLEY RD
3RD ST
Unofficial¾
%Zoning
IND: Industrial
N DR
AD: Airport Dist A-1: Agribusiness A-1: Agri-Bus B-2: Community Business
/
.
F ox
10
OLLEGE AV
County
%
¾ 441
441 MA
Pere
S GREEN BAY RD
R-4: Multi-Family Res Dist A-2: General Agr A-2: of

General Farm B-3: Regional Business
D
AGD: General Ag City

IN
CH R
ST
S LAWE S T
Neenah
EA
C: General Com RMF: Multi-Family Res B-2: Community Bus B-2: Community Bus I-1: Light Industrial
M IDW AY RD (COUNTY RD AP) LARSEN RD
TS B
Bu tt La ke
DR
Lake
CityRSF:
of Appleton
Mor es
E
RE
Village of B-3:
FoxGeneral
Crossing
MOR
W
Single Family Res
IS
C-2: Office Com Dist Bus B-3: General Bus I-2: Heavy Industrial
S HO
CO
Winnebago
e D
NS
ts
ST
S
IN
KE
/
.
E DE
CityRTF:
of Menasha
KE
AV
STEAD DR
Two Family Res

OAK ST
L it t le
Village M-1: Mixed Use

E
CL: Local
114 Com
S M EM O RIAL DR
I-1: Light Ind B-3(HB): General Bus (Highway)

LA
AV E SOUTH RIVER ST
LA
S
B UTT
Planning Area
Data Sources:
EC
ONE
S COMMERCIAL ST
f Harrison City of
Comprehensive Plan
P
CP: Planned Com City of Neenah I-2: Heavy Ind M-1: Light Ind & Office PDD/PDD-1: Planned Development Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, C
OS
IDA S T
CONGRESS ST
AIR
AV E and Outagamie Counties.
PR
RD
Appleton
E FREMONT ST PO
NNE
RT GE O
W
P-1: Public Inst M-2: Heavy Ind R-1: Rural Residential

EC
2018-2038
ID
R
KR D INN
County
Village of Harrison
!
"
#
A W W Outagamie Counties.
RD
!
"
#
SOT
41 Zoning: Fox Crossing (2016), Town of

N
To w n o f
41 R-1: Rural Res P-1: Inst and Recreational Park R-2: Suburban Low Density
Clayton
TO
MELISSA
Neenah (2009), Town of Clayton (201

LE
enah Sloug h
P
Calmuet County (2010), and Outagm

AP
W CEC IL ST E CECIL ST
City of Appleton
NINTH ST
Town R-2: Suburban Res R-1: Rural Res (Nonsubdivided) R-3: Suburban Medium Density County (2017).
T
TULLAR RD
LONDON ST
NS
RD
GIL
OC
E
IS O
R-4: Suburban High Density

W
R-2: Suburban Res (Subdivided)
LING
TO
ß /
. City of Menasha
NI
S PARK A
JJ
RR
Village 114
MA
HAM RD
Parcels
HA
SEVENTH ST
R-3: Two Family Res R-8: Manufactured/Mobile Home Park
of Harrison
Ne
TAYCO ST
City of Neenah
D
KR
MILWAUKEE ST
RACINE ST
VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) N
CityPrinted
of By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_UnofficialZoning.mxd
A
RD VALLEY PL
Waterbody
Menasha
/
.10 Village of Harrison
%
¾
441
Ca lu m et Cou nty
THIRD ST
T
%
¾ 441
ES
AK
NL

sha Chann el Mena Town
Parcels
NAYMUT ST
STEAD DR
Zoning Fox Crossing Planning Area

Zoning T. Clayton Zoning T. Neenah Waterbody
1ST ST
AIR
A-2: General Agriculture
NICOLET BLVD
Data Sources:
PO
RT
3RD ST
elopment Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet

RD
A-1: Agribusiness
and Outagamie Counties. A-1: Agri-Bus County
Village of Fox Crossing B-2: Community Business
RD
ST
N

TO
MELISSA
Winnebago County, WI B-3: Regional Business

MA
Outagamie Counties.
LE
A-2:NINTH
General Agr A-2: General Farm City of
IN
ST
P
Zoning: Fox Crossing (2016), Town of

AP
City of Appleton
ST
ty Neenah (2009), Town RofD Clayton (2013)
Neenah
LONDON ST
B-2: Community
Calmuet CountyBusW(2010),
OC andB-2: Community Bus
Outagmie I-1: Light Industrial
Lake
ensity
ETO
Village ./ City of Menasha

I
County (2017).N W
IS
B-3: General Bus B-3: General Bus 114 I-2: Heavy Industrial
MA
NTH ST
C ON
S IN Winnebago
ity
of (Highway)
Harrison
AV
OAK ST
M-1: Mixed Use

E
I-1: LightNK Ind B-3(HB): General Bus City of Neenah
RD
LA
e Home Park 0 0.35 0.7 Miles Data Sources:
S COMMERCIAL ST
I-2: Heavy Ind M-1: Light Ind & Office PDD/PDD-1: Planned Development Municipal Boundaries: Winnebago, Calumet
Village of Harrison
CONGRESS ST

Ca lu m et Cou nty

ST
P-1: Public Inst M-2: Heavy Ind R-1: Rural Residential Outagamie Counties. Winnebago County, WI
Zoning: Fox Crossing (2016), Town of
R-1: Rural Res
asha Chann el P-1: Inst and Recreational Park R-2: Suburban LowTown
Density Neenah (2009), Town of Clayton (2013)
C IL ST E CECIL ST Calmuet County (2010), and Outagmie
R-2: Suburban Res R-1: Rural Res (Nonsubdivided) R-3: Suburban Medium Density County (2017).
T
NS
Parcels
VE
IS O
R-2: Suburban Res (Subdivided) R-4: Suburban High Density

S PARK A
RR
Zoning Fox Crossing Appendix A | Community Indicators Report A-41

HA
R-3: Two Family Res R-8: Manufactured/Mobile Home Park 0 0.35 0.7 Miles
enah A-2: General Agriculture Waterbody

Bus B-2: Community Business
ral Farm B-3: Regional Business
Hortonia
Outagamie County Regional
Airport Zoning Map
A April 2, 2012
41
15 OO
Grand
Dale Chute
Greenville GV
AA
Map for the Appleton International Airport
Outagamie County's Airport Overlay Zoning
96
Legend
96
Municipality
Airport Zoning
AOD Airport Overlay District Zone 1
CA AOD Airport Overlay District Zone 2A

125
Appleton AOD Airport Overlay District Zone 2B
A
AOD Airport Overlay District Zone 3
AOD Airport Overlay District Zone 3A
CB
Airport Industrial District (AID)
Airport District (AD)

41
47 5,000 Ft buffer from AOA
76 10,000 Ft buffer from AOA
BB AOA = Air Operations Area
Menasha
Clayton
10
Printed by Outagamie County GIS

Data Provided By: Outagamie County, Winnebago County
Outagamie County does not guarantee this information
to be correct, current or complete. The maps are only
intended for use as a general reference and are not intended
41 for legal purposes or financial decisions. Any use to the
contrary of the above stated uses is the responsibility of the
76 user and such use is at the user's own risk. In no event shall
Outagamie County become liable to users of these maps for any
loss arising from the use of these maps.
Plat Review Jurisdiction Map Map of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
For the City of Appleton, City of Neenah, and Village of Fox Crossing
Town of
Town of Grand City of
Greenville Chute Appleton
US HWY 41
Village
of Fox
Crossing
US HWY 10
Calumet
Town of County
Clayton City of
Menasha
Town of
Neenah
City of
Neenah
Municipalities Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Major Highways

City of Appleton City of Appleton Principal Arterial
/
City of Menasha City of Neenah Minor Arterial
City of Neenah Village of Fox Crossing
0 0.5 1 2 Miles

Appendix B Co mmu n i t y S u r vey R esult s
Appe n d ix B
Co nte nt s
Community Survey Results
This section summarizes the Village of Fox Crossing Community Survey
Results which were collected during August and September of 2017. The
survey was hosted online on Survey Monkey and hard copies were available
at Village Hall. Information regarding the availability of survey was provided
via the water billing mailing cycle, press releases, emails to recreation
program users, Facebook posts, and announcements at Village Meetings.
In total, 438 individuals responded to the survey. Approximately 96% lived
within the Village (29% East of Little Lake Butte Des Morts; 36% West of Little
Lake Butte Des Morts AND north of Highway 10; 28% West of Little Lake
Butte Des Morts AND south of Highway 10; 4% don't live in Fox Crossing;
and 4% not sure).
The survey represents a diverse group demographically, though certain groups

were under- or over-represented. Generally younger members of the community
were under-represented and older members were over-represented.
Questions with additional comment/open-ended responses are marked

with an asterisk (e.g. Q1*) along with a summary of common responses. A
comprehensive list of all responses to open-ended questions is on file with
the Community Development Director.
Appendix B | Community Survey Results B-1

DE MOGR APH I C S
Q1 What is your age?

70 or older 10.10%
6.86%
60-69 9.80%
15.33%
50-59 15.90%
20.59%
40-49 12.60%
19.45%
2015 ACS Data
30-39 14.80% Survey

24.94%
20-29 12.80%
11.67%
15-19 4.50%
1.14%
<14 19.50%
0.00%
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00%
Q2 What is your gender?
Female, 47.69%
Male, 52.31%
B-4 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
Q3 Where do you live in Fox Crossing?**
Not Sure
I don't live in Fox Crossing
West of Little Lake Butte Des Morts AND south of Highway 10
West of Little Lake Butte Des Morts AND north of Highway 10
East of Little Lake Butte Des Morts
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
**Responses were filtered by those living East of Little Lake Butte Des Morts to identify any differences
between the view of east and west side residents. Out of the 437 respondents taking the survey, 125
reported they live on the east side. Approximately 34% of those living east of Little Lake Butte Des
Morts are age 60 or older as compared to 20% of overall survey respondents. Any additional differences
considered important are noted throughout this report.
Q4 Do you rent or own your current home?**

I rent or lease my home,
8.00%
**Responses were filtered by renters to identify

any differences between the view of renters and
homeowners. Out of the 437 respondents taking the
survey, 34 reported they rent or lease their home.
Approximately 35% of those renting or leasing are
age 20-29 as compared to 12% of overall survey
respondents. Any additional differences considered
important are noted throughout this report.
I own my home, 92.00%

HOUS I NG
Q5 What is the size of your current home?

Overall Survey Renters
1 bedroom, 1.41% 4+ bedrooms,
0.00%
2 bedrooms,
1 bedroom,
4+ bedrooms, 13.41%
3 bedrooms, 18.18%
25.41%
30.30%
3 bedrooms,
59.76% 2 bedrooms,
51.52%
Q6* If you were to move in the next 5 years (within or outside Fox Crossing),
what type of housing would you be likely to seek?
Other (please specify)

Dorm/student housing
Assisted living facility
Senior housing
C
Apartment (three or more bedrooms)
OMMON RESPONSE(S):
Apartment (two bedroom)
Apartment (one bedroom) • Condominiums
Duplex
Single family home (four or more bedrooms)
Single family home (three or fewer bedrooms)
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%
Renters Overall Responses
Q7 How much of your gross monthly household income do you spend on housing
(mortgage or rent)?
41%+
31-40%
21-30%
11-20%
0-10%
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
Renters Overall Responses
Q8 Indicate your level of agreement: the Village should provide opportunities

for affordable housing in the Village.
Strongly agree,
Strongly disagree, 14.12%
14.12%
Disagree,
27.29%
Agree, 44.47%

DE VE LOPME NT
Q9 Do you believe the pace of development in Fox Crossing is...

Overall Survey
Industrial
Office
Too slow
Retail
Just right
Too fast
Multi-family residential
Single-family residential
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
Respondents from East Side
Industrial
Office
Too slow
Retail
Just right
Too fast
Multi-family residential
Single-family residential
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
Q10 As development in the Village and region occurs, sometimes it's difficult to
discern whether you're in the Village or another community. Should Fox Crossing
do more to visually set itself apart from surrounding communities (e.g. unique
street signage, stronger "gateway" features, building design, unique street lighting,
installation of outdoor public art, etc.)
No,
36.16%
Yes,
63.84%
Q11 How do you rate the following aspects of the Village of Fox Crossing?
Aesthetics along corridors into the Village
Property upkeep/cleanliness
Landscaping of properties
Aesthetic design of buildings
Weighted Average
Lighting control
Noise control
Signage control
Number of street/terrace trees
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

poor.........................................................................excellent

DE VE LOPME NT CONT I NUE D
Q11* CONTINUED...
Excellent Weighted
Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
(4) Average
Number of street/terrace trees 9.30% 54.02% 30.15% 6.53% 2.34
Signage control 7.25% 62.50% 26.75% 3.50% 2.27
Noise control 10.00% 46.00% 24.75% 19.25% 2.53
Lighting control 6.47% 54.73% 30.85% 7.96% 2.4
Aesthetic design of buildings 8.71% 61.19% 26.62% 3.48% 2.25
Landscaping of properties 7.20% 63.52% 26.30% 2.98% 2.25
Property upkeep/cleanliness 11.66% 57.07% 25.81% 5.46% 2.25
Aesthetics along corridors into the Village 6.50% 51.75% 36.25% 5.50% 2.41
Q12 Do you think the Village should develop a mixed-use, pedestrian oriented
retail and entertainment Village Center that would have aspects similar to a
traditional downtown (i.e. mixed use, walkable, connected buildings, residential
development above ground floor retail, public plaza and outdoor spaces for dining
and events, etc.)?
No, 33.08%
Yes, 66.92%
Q13* Are there any specific new businesses or business types you would like
to see in Fox Crossing? Check all that apply.
Jewelry
T
Automotive sales and services
OP SURVEY RESPONSES:
Furniture/home furnishings
Personal care
Shoes
1. Sit-down restaurants
Electronics/applicances (69%)
Antiques
Liquor stores 2. Grocery Store (62%)
Art/craft supplies
3. Coffee Shop (48%)
Gift stores
Florists 4. Bakery (38%)
Big box retail (e.g. Walmart, Shopko, etc.)
5. Specialty/local food store
Sporting goods
(38%)
Veterinary/pet supplies
Office
Lumber/building/garden supplies
Clothing
Clinics (medical, dental, etc.)
C OMMON
RESPONSE(S):
Tavern
Manufacturing • Avoid too much Retail
Books, games, toys, hobbies
Hotel • More restaurants
Hardware
• Grocery Store (suggestions
Fast food restaurants include west of 41, organic
Pharmacy based, affordable)
Brew Pub
• Family entertainment
Specialty/local food store opportunities
Bakery
Coffee shop
Grocery store
Sit-down restaurants
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00%

TR ANSP ORTAT I ON + MOB I L I T Y
Q14* How do you typically get to work?

Public transit
Biking
C O M M O N
RESPONSE(S):
• Retired
• Work at/from home
Walking
Carpool or vanpool
Single-occupancy vehicle
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
Q15 What do you consider to be a reasonable walking/biking distance to these

locations?
Park
Convenience shopping
Grocery store
Restaurant
Work Place
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%
I wouldn't walk 1/4 mile or less 1/2 mile or less 1 mile 1-5 miles
Q16 How often do you:
Bike for transportation
Walk for transportation
Bike for exercise
Walk for exercise
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%
0 times in the past year 1-2 times per year

1-2 times per month 1-2 times per week
More than 2 times per week
Q17* Name a specific destination or location (e.g. intersection, roadway, route)

in Fox Crossing that needs to be improved for bike or pedestrian use or safety.
C OMMON RESPONSE(S):
• Kaufman and Cold Spring

• Palisades area
• Valley Road
• Hwy B.B.
• 47
• Airport Road
• Irish Road
• Appleton Road
• Little Lake Butte Des Mortes
• Cold Spring
• American Drive
• Shady Lane
• Midway Road
• Racine
• Winchester
• Routes to and around our parks
• Jacobsen Road
• Clayton Avenue

TR ANSP ORTAT I ON + MOB I L I T Y CONT I NUE D
Q18 What type of bike facility do you feel safe using? Check all that apply.
I use the sidewalk even if there is a bike lane
Unpaved off-road trail
Paved off-road trail
On-road, no barrier from cars
On-road, pavement painted, dedicated bike lane
On-road, dedicated bike lane, with physical barrier from cars
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
Q19 On average, how often do you use the Valley Transit bus service?
Once a month, 0.25% Once per week, 0.00%

Occasionally (couple of Once per day, 0.00%
times a year), 5.85%
Never, 93.89%
Q20* Is there anything that could be improved about Valley Transit bus service
to increase your use? Check all that apply.
I'm unlikely to use Valley Transit
Current service is fine
Improve bus stop facilities
Increase frequency of buses

• Add more bus stops.

• Add benches/shelters to stops.
• More education about the
Expanded routes routes and how to utilize
system.
Expanded days of operation • It's a significantly longer
commute than by personal car.
Expanded operating hours
Lower fares
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
Q21 Indicate your level of agreement: it is important for the Village to remain
connected to the Valley Transit system.
Strongly
Disagree,
Disagree, 4.46%
13.12% Strongly agree,
27.82%
Agree, 54.59%

TR ANSP ORTAT I ON + MOB I L I T Y CONT I NUE D
Q22 What do you see as Fox Crossing's most pressing transportation issue?
Please rank the following issues in order of importance to you, where 1 is "most
important" and 5 is "least important".
Maintenance on local roads (not

state highways or county roads)
Lack of safe biking routes
Lack of safe walking routes

Weighted Average
Improved bus service
Traffic congestion on local roads

(not state highways or county roads)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

most important................least important
Weighted
1 2 3 4 5
Average
Traffic congestion on local roads (not state
highways or county roads) 14.87% 18.35% 14.56% 34.81% 17.41% 3.22
Improved bus service 7.12% 6.82% 8.61% 18.99% 58.46% 4.15
Lack of safe walking routes 22.83% 26.37% 33.76% 11.58% 5.47% 2.5
Lack of safe biking routes 14.29% 28.27% 25.60% 23.21% 8.63% 2.84
Maintenance on local roads (not state highways or
county roads) 40.11% 21.17% 19.22% 10.58% 8.91% 2.27
COMMUN I T Y FAC I L I T I E S + SE RV I C E S
Q23* Should the Village invest more tax dollars to improve the quality of any
of the following public facilities or services? Check all that apply.
Village Hall
Trash collection
Wastewater treatment
Ambulance services
T OP SURVEY RESPONSES:
1. Street Maintenance (51%)

Senior services
2. Bike/ped facilities (33%)
Stormwater management
Brush pickup 3. Drinking water quality

(28%)
Recycling services
Fire protection 4. Parks (27%)

Library services
Police protection
Yard waste disposal
Recreation programming (sports and non-…
Snow removal
Leaf pickup
Parks
Drinking water quality
Bike/ped facilities
Street maintenance
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%

COMMUN I T Y FAC I L I T I E S + SE RV I C E S CONT I NUE D
Q24 Indicate your level of agreement: the Village should expand its use of
alternative and renewable energy.
Strongly disagree,
3.17%
Disagree,
9.79%
Strongly
agree,
37.83%
Agree, 49.21%
PAR K + R EC R E AT I ON
Q25* Which of the following park and recreation amenities would you like to
be added, improved or expanded in Fox Crossing either by the Village or other
public or private entities? Mark up to five preferences:
La crosse fields
Park parking lots
T
Horseshoe pits
OP SURVEY RESPONSES:
Skateboarding facilities
Park signage/directional signage
Curling rink 1. Off-road walking/biking
Ice skating/hockey rink (indoor) trails (32%)
Football fields
Bocce ball courts 2. Dog park (30%)
Soccer fields
Snowmobile trails 3. Nature preserve (27%)
Shelters
Pickle ball courts
4. Outdoor pool (26%)
Lighted athletic fields/courts
Tennis courts
5. Splash pad (19%)
ATV trails
Hunting areas
Sand volleyball courts
X-country skiing
Golf course
Golf driving range
Disc golf course
Camping areas
Boating facilities
Outdoor fitness course/equipment
Off-road mountain biking trails
Snowshoeing
Playground equipment
Park landscaping/trees
Fishing facilities
Site furnishings (benches, tables, grills, etc.)
Golf course
Golf driving range
Disc golf course
Camping areas
Boating facilities
PAR K Outdoor
+ Rfitness
EC R E AT I ON CONT I NUE D
course/equipment
Off-road mountain biking trails
Snowshoeing
Playground equipment
Park landscaping/trees
Fishing facilities
Site furnishings (benches, tables, grills, etc.)
• Baseball/Softball
Diamonds
Restrooms • Nature Preserve
Sledding hill • Trails/walking paths
(specifically on east
Ice skating/hockey rink (outdoor)
side)
Archery/trap shooting range
On-road bicycle facilities
Indoor athletic complex (for multiple…
Community gardens
Indoor pool
Lake & shoreline restoration
Splash pad
Outdoor pool
Nature preserve
Dog park
Off-road walking/biking trails
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00%
Q26 Indicate your level of agreement: the Village provides and should continue
to provide opportunities for healthy, active living.
Strongly disagree,
Disagree, 1.58%
3.95%
Agree,
38.95% Strongly
agree,
55.53%
NATUR AL + AGR I CULTUR AL R E SOURC E S
Q27 Indicate your level of agreement: the Village should identify and protect
environmentally sensitive areas.
Disagree, Strongly
2.89% disagree, 1.84%
Strongly
Agree, agree,
43.42% 51.84%
Q28 Indicate your level of agreement: the Village should preserve space for urban
agriculture (e.g. community gardens) and integrate it into new developments.
Strongly disagree,
2.11%
Disagree,
15.04%
Strongly
agree,
32.45%
Agree,
50.40%

COMMUN I T Y C HAR AC TE R
Q29 Do you believe there should be more art/cultural events hosted in the
Village?
No,
39.20%
Yes,
60.80%
Q30 How do you prefer to stay informed about what is going on in the
community?
Other (please specify) C OMMON RESPONSE(S):
• Word of mouth
• Snail Mail
Community meetings • Combination of all of the
above
Annual newsletter • TV broadcast of the meetings
Social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter)
Email
Local news
Village website
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00%
COMMUN I T Y C HAR AC TE R CONT I NUE D
Q31 Are there any improvements you would like to see in Fox Crossing's future
that were not covered in this survey?
• Better access to a library system within the community.

• Attract more businesses.
• Better yard waste pick-up.
• Improve side effects of trains (whistles, speed, etc.)
• Enforcement of existing codes and regulations.
• Continue to enforce name change and new identity.
• Construction of a highway sound barrier for neighborhoods
• Garbage large item pick-up or drop off within the Village.
• More control over burning within Village limits.
• Perception/reality that the west side of town is treated better than the east.
• More streetscaping/landscaping/wayfinding to attract new residents
• Better noise control, overall.
• Better design standards for developments and apartment buildings.
• Keep small town, country feel. Utilize smart, controlled development.
• Basic street and sidewalk maintenance to reduce potholes and bumps.

Appendix C Pu b l ic I nvo l vement M eeti n g I np ut
Appe n d ix C
Co nte nt s
Public Involvement Meeting Input
Appendix C provides a compilation of comment forms completed at the two
public involvement meetings held during the planning project.
»» Public Involvement Meeting #1, July 25, 2017

»» Public Involvement Meeting #2, April 30, 2018
Appendix C | Public Involvement Meeting Input C-1

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT residential. It continues to grow but environment.
MEETING #1 at an acceptable pace. Needs some
retail but strategic ones. • Area located nearest to little lake
butte des morts on both sides.
An initial public involvement meeting
• Growing with room to expand good
was held on July 25th to provide
mix of residential and commercial/ A second question asked
the public with an overview of the
industrial. Could use more multi- participants "what do you love
planning project, schedule, objectives,
family quasi downtown. about Fox Crossing? What
and schedule. In addition, several
visioning exercises were completed • A growing new village in the would you protect, enhance, or
to gather resident feedback on issues Appleton Wisconsin Metroplex replicate?" Responses included:
and opportunities of the community. offering quality living along the fox
Approximately 20-30 people • I love the parks, bike trails, protect
river with efficient services and a the parks-Natural Resources
attended the meeting. The responsible government dedicated
following is a summary of to low taxes and successful • Have 55+ Housing, Enforce airport
input gathered at the meeting. business growth initiatives. Recent overlay
transportation changes make
The initial exercise asked participants Fox Crossing the most desirable • The park system is exceptional for
"how would you describe Fox community to live, raise a family, the size of the community
Crossing to someone not from work and play!
the region? What is our current • Water shoreline on Fox River and
identity?" Responses included: • Family friendly, rural feel that’s still Lake Winnebago and island on Fox
close to bigger cities and shopping. River. It needs to be incorporated in
• Was the town of Menasha? It doesn’t
A good mix of old and newer its identity-good start Fox Crossing
really have a town (village) center.
The river; slow growth on the west neighborhoods.
side but we think it will grow. • Love the small feel of Fox Crossing.
• Where Tom’s drive in is… It is relatively safe. People are
• I love it! We have a farm, stream, friendly, clean, not over developed
• Family oriented area, village officials
woods and home only minutes from on west side. Like to maintain the
are available to talk too and are
10/41. We can get to downtown small nature of town but add some
concerned about any issues if you
Appleton in 10 minutes and strategic retailers. The walking/
have any. Current identity: lower
downtown Oshkosh in 20. We biking paths are really great.
taxes and not afraid to grow.
are close to everything , yet have
privacy and 8 acres. Great location. • Fox Crossing provides phenomenal
• Suburb of Appleton WI contributing
community services at a high value
to the larger fox cities metropolitan
• A rapidly growing progressive and compared to taxation. Great police,
community. Encircles a major
modern community. fire, utility, refuse collection, etc.
interstate intersection and centers
Positive partnership with other
• Best parks, good government, around both ends of the little lake
municipalities, often relying on
central location, friendly people, butte des morts bridge.
them for major offerings (school,
identity separate from Neenah and fireworks, etc.).
• Village of fox crossing is successor
Menasha. to town of Menasha established
• I love that the village doesn’t feel
• Fox Crossing is a smaller community in 1855, Village of fox crossing
like a large city. I hear birds, see trees
compared to a larger city it is a identity is unfolding with Westside
and enjoy outdoor/country feel.
“quaint” community/ current expansion. Village of fox crossing
identity-a lower tax area. needs to develop its identity: new • I love all the trees and farms. I love
businesses old supporters. the parks and rec programs for
• A village that is a “suburb” of my kids. I would protect some of
Appleton and Neenah, between • Identity is growth sustaining
the farming areas and parks and
the two. West side is primarily community, valuing conservation/
enhance the walking/biking trails.
nature, recreations and
C-2 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
• Protect the woodlands and wildlife A final question asked participants joes) NO big box stores.
habitat areas. Pedestrian friendly "looking 20 years into the future,
crosswalks making it easier to go what are your big ideas and • Community Gardens, maintain
around the Village either walking aspirations for our community? sense of community connect people
or biking. I like the park system. What would you change or together with land.
improve?" Responses included:
• It is not highly developed, a lot
of trails to run/bike/walk, open • Expanded transportation more
spaces/green spaces, I don’t feel • Stricter rules on houses being built. condo/residential. Having greater
like I live in a big city. Protect green Like check what is underground develop in mix-economics rental and
space do not over develop! Fox before digging, with all bed rock in services.
crossing has a bit of a country feel area and blasting, don’t just dig a
(in some areas). hole and stick up a home. • I would like to see a splash pad an
indoor pool/community center to
• We like the country feel yet close • A grocery store and continued use during winter. And the trails
to city. growth. to connect better. I would like to
see a little more development in
• Very little traffic. Lots of trees and • Intergrate the old-eastside and the residential and businesses to help
some farms. Ease of walking and new Westside expansion, how to do the community grow. And we really
biking to get to places and wide it is job yet undone. need help with the open enrollment
trails so not on the road. Office policy in the school district. All
buildings with nice landscaping. • Established senior housing over 55. students should be able to attend
the school they are zoned by, maybe
• Fox Crossing has a plethora • Improve fire emergency services. its time to make schools bigger and
of community parks that are update them.
maintained to outstanding visual • Limit multi-unit dwelling (i.e.
and contemporary uses. The apartments) add grocery store, • Fox crossing needs a powerful
village has easy access to all areas continue to maintain good roads, positioning statement reflecting a
of the region. You can’t beat the continue to share development new “identity” driven by a unique
quality of police/fire protection. plans, ensure builders are following and technologically advanced
All because of responsible regulations and codes. community park/recreation complex.
governance. This will serve as the core anchor for
• Nature, water, and the nearness to • Snow plowing before 4 inches get on the Village that drives small business
recreation centers. the road. Builders need to check their and economic development.
development for water issues they Improve communications to the
• Lots of parks country feel. need to know the landscape they are public.
building on and build accordingly.
• It is a “blank slate” with tons of A second map-based activity
room to develop into a cute village • Does it really need a lot of changing? provided participants an
close to the country and “mall” This group seems obsessed with opportunity to provide
dark skies as you come out of the growth and industrialization. I love specific comments regarding:
“city” (Appleton). the open fields  proud of country
A. Road Improvement. Areas
feel, I do not want to feel like I live in
• Protect green space trails both that you feel are in need of a
Neenah or Appleton.
walking and biking careful transportation improvement
expansion into “growth” areas. (e.g., road reconstruction, road
• More affordable housing/tiny homes,
widening, road narrowing,
• Close enough to walk or bike solar panels.
intersection improvement, etc.)
to work. Great trash/recycle bin
system. • Add a small grocery store I can walk B. Bike/Pedestrian
or bike to on the west side (trader Improvement. Areas that you feel

need a better connection, access • 41. E-Identify neighborhoods of • 108. D-sound barriers on HWY 10
or crossing for pedestrians or bike brighton beach/plank road in
facilities (e.g., on-road bike lane, plan and embellish • 110. D-Outdoor Ice rink/free disc
off-road path, etc.) golf/radio controlled airplane/RC
C. Public Safety Concern. Nodes • 42. E-Identify neighborhoods fields
or Areas that you feel pose a of sterling heights in plan and
concern to public safety embellish • 111. D/E-Recreation park/
complex for concerts
D. Community Assets. Assets • 43. E-Identify neighborhoods synchronized musical fireworks
in the Village that should be of Midway road in plan and major events, community
maintained, enhanced, or embellish programming, sporting
replicated activity-co developed with
• 71.B-The entire east side is private life style retail and
E. (Re)Development Sites. entirely devoid of biking and destination projects include trails
Parcels or blocks you feel should pedestrian pathways and observatory that rises above
be (re)developed and for what the area with views over a 5-10
uses. • 72.C-The fire emergency services mile radius
are lacking in response times
F. Preservation Sites. Parcels or • 113. B-Need a bold Fox crossing
areas you feel should be preserved • 86. F-Preserve Woodland Prairie identity signage and Racine road
as undeveloped land over the next park improvement for bikers
10-20 years or beyond.
G. Future Land Use Changes. • 87. F-Do NOT annex into town • 114. G-Buy out quarry for
Parcels or areas you feel should be of Clayton. We do not have any development of the recreation
a different use than is presented agriculture as a village (that I complex as outlined above
on the Village's current Future see here today) to preserve Fox
Land Use Map. Crossing’s country feel, we must • 117. Train horn abatement
not focus on developing what is
The following is a summary currently the towns. • 118.B-better way for pedestrians
of the responses provided by and bikes to cross
participants. The letter before each • 95. E-Grocery Store C-Abandoned
comment indicates the specific properties not being taken care • 136.B-A sidewalk that makes it
topic (i.e. A-Road Improvement, of also have standing water in easier to get to the little stripmall
F-Preservation Sites) and the trailer parks. Have discussed that has holidays from the south
number corresponds to the with commissioner. Says nothing side
location of the map on page 9. can be done, but it is clearly a
breeding ground for mosquitos • 137.A-Is there anyway to reduce
• 35. C-Public safety concern! the traffic noise from highway
Appleton Road (midway too 9th • 96. A-Need road improvement 10? The friendship trail is not as
St.) throughout the neighborhood restful as I’d like
• 36. C-Oneida street (Manitowoc • 97. A-fill pot holes or man-hole • 138.A-Can we stop the train horns
Rd. to plank Rd.) sidewalks or cover blowing at this intersection?
bicycle paths on trails Aren’t the bars coming down
• 98. E-Would like to see a grocer in enough I accept the house
• 37. F-Partnership with heckrodt the village rattling but the horn still wakes
wetland reserve to improve me up after 14 years
brigton beach open space 8.98 • 106. A/B-Finish cutoff gutter,
acres stormwater/sidewalk
C-4 V i l l a g e o f F o x C r o s s i n g | C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n
• 139.A/C-Initiate land swaps with • 158. B-Woodland park when
the city or explore cost sharing developed should involve more
programs to enhance road trails for hiking and left natural
maintenance and/or services for wildlife
and/or co development projects
when merkes is ousted • 159. –Strobe marsh area be
worked into a nature area
• 141. A-CB North of Shady should
be 4 lanes (2 each way) • 160. C-Quarry pumping water
into ditches on cold spring road
• 142. B/C-Need sidewalk/trail/ either side
shoulder on side of road. No
where to walk or ride bikes. No • 161. A-Curb and gutter on fatime,
shoulder and 6 foot deep ditches. slightly wider
Probably 100’s of walkers and
bikers per day. Jacobsen between • 162. C-Increased street lights
CB and Irish
• 163. E- redevelop non-cemetary
• 147. A-Jacobsen road is too portion to commercial
narrow and dangerous for
pedestrians and cyclists between • 164. G-Long term strategy
CB and Irish road for property? Single family
residential
• 148.D-Can we have a closer place
to recycle cardboard boxes? • 181. B-We need sidewalks on Irish
Online shopping results in lots of road from county Rd II to Hwy 10.
boxes also styrofoam People run and walk on this road
all the time and there’s not a safe
• 149. B-Please pave the friendship place for them. It would be nice
trail all the way to the weyuwega to connect the friendship trail
the gravel shifts and isn’t safe with the trail on County road II
then.
• 182. B-Same problem as 181 we
• 151. A-Sidewalk/shoulder/Irish need sidewalks on Clayton Ave
Road needs road improvement- from county road II to Highway
would be nice to have sidewalk to 10
park that’s on Irish
• 183. B-We also need sidewalks
• 152. F/D-Preserve/We moved to on Jacobsen to extend to CB its
the area for the country feel yet another place that people use
close to the city. Would like to often to walk/bike
keep it quiet
• 235.-Noise abatement policy for
• 156. A- Cold spring road to be ATW
improved/widened

Points of Interest from the Public Input Meeting
July 25th 2017
)
"
235C 97A
)
"
157
)
"
)
"
114G 159F
152F 160C )
"
)
" 151A )
"
)
"
)
"

Village of Fox Crossing - Comp Plan

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Village of Fox Crossing - Comp Plan

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Village of

VILLAGE BOARD Plan Adopted: July 23rd, 2018

II Village of Fox Crossing | Comprehensive Plan

Chapter 2: Planning Process & Public Input Summary

Chapter 3: Goals, Objectives & Strategies

Chapter 4: Future Land Use Plan

Appendix A: Community Indicators Report

Appendix B: Community Survey

Appendix C: Public Involvement Meeting Input

Chapter 1 | Introduction III

»» The Plan as a Living Guide

Chapter 1 | Introduction 1-1

• Transportation has been modified to Mobility &

• Economic Development has been modified to

• Utilities and Community Facilities has been modified

• Intergovernmental Cooperation has been modified to

• Cultural Resources has been modified to Community

While the Village has chosen to deviate slightly from the

The information required under Wis. Stat. 66.1001 regarding

Chapter 1 | Introduction 1-3

Major transportation facilities serving

VALLEY RD (COUNTY RD P) VALLEY RD

and Outagamie Counties.

City of Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and

Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_CorporateLimits.mxd Print Date: 6/6/2018

SEVENTH ST Village .114

RD AV E and Outagamie Counties. Winnebago County, WI

ON Street Centerlines: Winnebago, Calumet and

Printed By: abremer, File: P:\10900s\10960s\10967\10967004\GIS\10967004_Planning Area.mxd Print Date: 6/6/2018

Based on Wisconsin Department of Administration

Additional community indicators are summarized

Population Trends & Projections

Village of Village of Town of City of Winnebago

Chapter 1 | Introduction 1-7

• Town of Menasha Commercial

• Town of Menasha Business Profile,

• Town of Menasha Bicycle and

• Incorporation Submittal, 2015

• Village of Fox Crossing Zoning

• Village of Fox Crossing

Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input 2-1

APRIL 30, 2018 - PUBLIC

MAY 16, 2018 - PC MEETING #6

JULY 18, 2018 - PC MEETING

JULY 9, 2018 - VILLAGE

Village of Fox Crossing

Public Participation Opportunities:

Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input 2-3

Vote: Yes_____ No_____

Adopted this __________ day of ____________________, 2017. Attest:

Village President, Dale Youngquist Village Clerk, Karen Backman

Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input 2-5

B. Bike/Pedestrian • 5 comments related to Public

Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input

The figure to the right highlights

Chapter 2 | Planning Process & Public Input 2-9

Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-1

2. E ncourage housing diversity

Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-3

f. Increase access to transit facilities.

Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-5

enhancing the quality of life of the

Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-7

• Fox River and Little Lake Butte des

• Future reuse of existing quarry

Chapter 3 | Goals, Objectives, Strategies 3-9

Vote: Yes_ No_

Adopted this day of __________, 2017. Attest: