Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Tom M. Apostol
Al) Jim 7TI 3M ::F M
a * 1 1A H
China Machine Press
English reprint edition copyright @ 2∞4 by Pearson Education Asia Limited and China Machine
Press.
由iginal English language title: Mathematical Analysis, Second Edition (ISBN: 0-201-∞288-4)
仅限于中华人民共和国境内(不包括中国香港、澳门特别行政区和中国台湾地区)销售
发行。
本书封面贴有Pearson Education (培生教育出版集团)激光防伪标签,无标签者不得销售。
版权所有,侵权必究。
本书版权登记号:圄字: 01-2004-3691
圄书在版编目 (CIP) 鼓据
责任编辑:迟振春
北京牛山世兴印刷厂印刷·新华书店北京发行所发行
定价: 49.∞元
凡购本书,如有倒页、脱页、缺页,由本社发行部调换
本社购书热线 (010) 68326294
PREFACE
A glance at the table of contents will reveal that this textbook treats topics in
analysis at the "Advanced Calculus" level. The aim has been to provide a develop-
ment of the subject which is honest, rigorous, up to date, and, at the same time,
not too pedantic. The book provides a transition from elementary calculus to
advanced courses in real and complex function theory, and it introduces the reader
to some of the abstract thinking that pervades modern analysis.
The second edition differs from the first in many respects. Point set topology
is developed in the setting of general metric spaces as well as in Euclidean n-space,
and two new chapters have been added on Lebesgue integration. The material on
line integrals, vector analysis, and surface integrals has been deleted. The order of
some chapters has been rearranged, many sections have been completely rewritten,
and several new exercises have been added.
The development of Lebesgue integration follows the Riesz-Nagy approach
which focuses directly on functions and their integrals and does not depend on
measure theory. The treatment here is simplified, spread out, and somewhat
rearranged for presentation at the undergraduate level.
The first edition has been used in mathematics courses at a variety of levels,
from first-year undergraduate to first-year graduate, both as a text and as supple-
mentary reference. The second edition preserves this flexibility. For example,
Chapters 1 through 5, 12, and 13 provide a course in differential calculus of func-
tions of one or more variables. Chapters 6 through 11, 14, and 15 provide a course
in integration theory. Many other combinations are possible; individual instructors
can choose topics to suit their needs by consulting the diagram on the next page,
which displays the logical interdependence of the chapters.
I would like to express my gratitude to the many people who have taken the
trouble to write me about the first edition. Their comments and suggestions
influenced the preparation of the second edition. Special thanks are due Dr.
Charalambos Aliprantis who carefully read the entire manuscript and made
numerous helpful suggestions. He also provided some of the new exercises.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge my debt to the undergraduate students of
Caltech whose enthusiasm for mathematics provided the original incentive for this
work.
Pasadena T.M.A.
September 1973
LOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE CHAPTERS
1
THE REAL AND COM-
PLEX NUMBER SYSTEMS
2
SOME BASIC NOTIONS
OF SET THEORY
3
ELEMENTS OF POINT
SET TOPOLOGY
I
4
LIMITS AND
CONTINUITY
I
5
DERIVATIVES
I
6
FUNCTIONS OF BOUNDED
VARIATION AND REC-
TIFIABLE CURVES
8 12
INFINITE SERIES AND MULTIVARIABLE DIF-
INFINITE PRODUCTS FERENTIAL CALCULUS
13
7 IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS
THE RIEMANN- AND EXTREMUM
STIELTJES INTEGRAL PROBLEMS
9 14
SEQUENCES OF MULTIPLE RIEMANN
FUNCTIONS INTEGRALS
10
THE LEBESGUE
INTEGRAL
I
11
FOURIER SERIES AND
FOURIER INTEGRALS
16 15
CAUCHY'S THEOREM AND MULTIPLE LEBESGUE
THE RESIDUE CALCULUS INTEGRALS
CONTENTS
Chapter 5 Derivatives
5.1 Introduction . . . 104
5.2 Definition of derivative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
5.3 Derivatives and continuity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
5.4 Algebra of derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
5.5 The chain rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
5.6 One-sided derivatives and infinite derivatives . . . . . . . 107
5.7 Functions with nonzero derivative . . . . . . . . . . 108
5.8 Zero derivatives and local extrema . . . . . . . . . . 109
5.9 Rolle's theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
5.10 The Mean-Value Theorem for derivatives . . . . . . . . 110
5.11 Intermediate-value theorem for derivatives . . . . . . . . 111
5.12 Taylor's formula with remainder . . . . . . . . . . . 113
5.13 Derivatives of vector-valued functions . . . . . . . . . 114
5.14 Partial derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
5.15 Differentiation of functions of a complex variable . . . . . . 116
5.16 The Cauchy-Riemann equations . . . . . . . . . . . 118
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
Th. 4.29 Functions Continuous on Compact Sets 83
X under f -1.) Since X is closed and S is compact, X is compact (by Theorem 3.39),
sof(X) is compact (by Theorem 4.25) and hencef(X) is closed (by Theorem 3.38).
This completes the proof.
Example. This example shows that compactness of S is an essential part of Theorem
4.29. Let S = [0, 1) with the usual metric of RI and consider the complex-valued function
f defined by
f(x) = e2nrx for 0 < x < 1.
This is a one-to-one continuous mapping of the half-open interval [0, 1) onto the unit
circle Iz I = I in the complex plane. However, f -1 is not continuous at the point f (O).
For example, if x = 1 - 1 In, the sequence {f(x) } converges to f (O) but [x.) does not
converge in S.
IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS
AND EXTREMUM PROBLEMS
13.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter consists of two principal parts. The first part discusses an important
theorem of analysis called the implicit function theorem; the second part treats
extremum problems. Both parts use the theorems developed in Chapter 12.
The implicit function theorem in its simplest form deals with an equation of
the form
f(x, t) = 0. (1)
367
368 Implicit Functions and Extremum Problems Th. 13.1
Next we show that the system (2) can be written in the form (1). Each equation
in (2) has the form
fi(x, t) = 0 where x = (xl, ... , t = (tl,
and
/i(X, t) _
j=1
ai jx j - ti.
Therefore the system in (2) can be expressed as one vector equation f(x, t) = 0,
where f = (f1i ... , f ). If D jfi denotes the partial derivative off; with respect to
the j th coordinate xj, then D j f i(x, t) = ai j. Thus the coefficient matrix A = [ai j]
in (2) is a Jacobian matrix. Linear algebra tells us that (2) has a unique solution if
the determinant of this Jacobian matrix is nonzero.
In the general implicit function theorem, the nonvanishing of the determinant
of a Jacobian matrix also plays a role. This comes about by approximating f by
a linear function. The equation f(x, t) = 0 gets replaced by a system of linear
equations whose coefficient matrix is the Jacobian matrix of f.
NOTATION. If f = (fl, ... , and x = (x1, ... , x.), the Jacobian matrix
Df(x) = [D j fi(x)] is an n x n matrix. Its determinant is called a Jacobian
determinant and is denoted by Jf(x). Thus,
Jf(x) = det Df(x) = det [Djfi(x)].
The notation
a(fl, ... I A)
a(x1, ... , x,.)
f(B)
f(a)
f
Figure 13.1
Theorem 13.2. Let B = B(a; r) be an n-ball in R", let 8B denote its boundary,
8B= {x:llx-all=r},
and let B = B u 8B denote its closure. Let f = (f1, ... , f") be continuous on B,
and assume that all the partial derivatives Dj f;(x) exist if x e B. Assume further
that f(x) 0 f(a) if x e 8B and that the Jacobian determinant JJ(x) : 0 for each
x in B. Then f(B), the image of B under f, contains an n-ball with center at f(a).
T = B(f(a); 2) .
We will prove that T c f(B) and this will prove the theorem. (See Fig. 13.1.)
To do this we show that y e T implies y e f(B). Choose a point y in T, keep
y fixed, and define a new real-valued function h on B as follows :
a minimum. Since
and since each partial derivative Dk(h2) must be zero at c, we must have
n
Assume the contrary. That is, assume that f(x) = f(y) for some pair of points
x # y in B(a). Since B(a) is convex, the line segment L(x, y) c B(a) and we can
apply the Mean-Value Theorem to each component of f to write
0 = .fi(y) - .fi(x) = Vfi(Z) - (y - x) for i = 1, 2, ... , n,
where each Zi a L(x, y) and hence Zi a B(a). (The Mean-Value Theorem is
applicable because f is differentiable on S.) But this is a system of linear equations
of the form
r"
(Yk - xk)aik = 0 with aik = Dkf(Zi)
Figure 13.2
open, y + tur e Y if t is sufficiently small.) Let x = g(y) and let x' = g(y + tu,).
Then both x and x' are in X and f(x') - f(x) = tu,. Hence f;(x') - f,(x) is 0 if
i r, and is t if i = r. By the Mean-Value Theorem we have
f (x') - AX) = Vf (Z1) - x' - x for i = 1, 2, ... , n,
t t
where each Zt is on the line segment joining x and x'; hence Zi a B. The expression
on the left is 1 or 0, according to whether i = r or i r. This is a system of n
linear equations in n unknowns (x; - xj)lt and has a unique solution, since
det [Djf1(Zi)] = h(Z) : 0.
Solving for the kth unknown by Cramer's rule, we obtain an expression for
[gk(y + tUr) - gk(y)]/t as a quotient of determinants. As t -+ 0, the point x -> x,
since g is continuous, and hence each Z; -+ x, since Zi is on the segment joining
x to V. The determinant which appears in the denominator has for its limit the
number det [Djff(x)] = Jf(x), and this is nonzero, since x e X. Therefore, the
following limit exists :
9k(Y + tur) - 9k(Y) = Dr9k(Y)-
lim
t
This establishes the existence of Drgk(y) for each y in Y and each r = 1, 2, ... , n.
Moreover, this limit is a quotient of two determinants involving the derivatives
D j fi(x). Continuity of the D j f, implies continuity of each partial D,gk. This
completes the proof of (e).
NOTE. The foregoing proof also provides a method for computing D,gk(y). In
practice, the derivatives Dgk can be obtained more easily (without recourse to a
limiting process) by using the fact that, if y = f(x), the product of the two Jacobian
matrices Df(x) and Dg(y) is the identity matrix. When this is written out in detail
it gives the following system of n2 equations:
n
if i = j,
E Dk91(Y)Djjk(x) = {0 1
if i j.
For each fixed i, we obtain n linear equations as j runs through the values
1, 2, ... , n. These can then be solved for the n unknowns, D1gj(y),... , D g1(y),
by Cramer's rule, or by some other method.
pairs (x, y) which satisfy the equation. The following question therefore presents
itself quite naturally: When is the relation defined by F(x, y) = 0 also a function?
In other words, when can the equation F(x, y) = 0 be solved explicitly for y in
terms of x, yielding a unique- solution? The implicit function theorem deals with
this question locally. It tells us that, give a point (xo, yo) such that F(xo, yo) = 0,
under certain conditions there will be a neighborhood of (xo, yo) such that in this
neighborhood the relation defined by F(x, y) = 0 is also a function. The conditions
are that F and D2F be continuous in some neighborhood of (xo, yo) and that
D2F(xo, yo) # 0. In its more general form, the theorem treats, instead of one
equation in two variables, a system of n equations in n + k variables:
f.(x1, ... , xn; t1, .. - , tk) = 0 (r = 1, 2, ... , n).
This system can be solved for x1, .. . , x" in terms of t1, ... , tk, provided that
certain partial derivatives are continuous and provided that the n x n Jacobian
determinant 8(fl, ... , fn)/8(x1, ... , xn) is not zero.
For brevity, we shall adopt the following notation in this theorem: Points in
(n + k)-dimensional space R"+k will be written in the form (x; t), where
x = (x1,...,xn)ER" and t = (t1,...,tk)eRk.
Theorem 13.7 (Implicit function theorem). Let f = (f 1, ... , f") be a vector-valued
function defined on an open set S in R"+k with values in R". Suppose f e C' on S.
Let (xo; to) be a point in S for which f(xo; to) = 0 and for which the n x n determi-
nant det [Djfi(xo; to)] # 0. Then there exists a k-dimensional open set To con-
taining to and one, and only one, vector-valued function g, defined on To and having
values in R", such that
a) g e C' on To,
b) g(to) = xo,
c) f(g(t); t) = 0 for every t in To.
Proof. We shall apply the inverse function theorem to a certain vector-valued
function F = (F1, ... , Fn; Fn+1, ... , Fn+k) defined on S and having values in
R"+k The function F is defined as follows: For 1 < m < n, let Fm(x; t) = fn(x; t),
and for 1 < m < k, let Fn+m(x; t) = We can then write F = (f; I), where
f = (fl, ... , fn) and where I is the identity function defined by I(t) = t for each t
in Rk. The Jacobian JF(x; t) then has the same value as the n x n determinant
det [Djfi(x; t)] because the terms which appear in the last k rows and also in the
last k columns of JF(x; t) form a k x k determinant with ones along the main
diagonal and zeros elsewhere; the intersection of the first n rows and n columns
consists of the determinant det [Djfi(x; t)], and
DiF,+ j(x; t) = 0 for 1 5 i < n, 1 < j 5 k.
Hence the Jacobian JF(xo; to) .96 0. Also, F(xo; to) _ (0; to). Therefore, by
Theorem 1-3.6, there exist open sets X and Y containing (xo; to) and (0; to),
respectively, such that F is one-to-one on X, and X = F-1(Y). Also, there exists
Extrema of Real-Valued Functions 375