Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The year-end closing in Asset Accounting is a required step before you can close the fiscal year in
Financial Accounting (FI). If you omit this step, or do not carry it out until after closing the fiscal
year in FI, serious problems can result. Among these could be problems with reconciliation (usually
differences between values in asset accounting and in the general ledger that result from
depreciation recalculation), or difficulties in changing master data. In order to prevent these
problems before they can happen, you should follow the steps below in the sequence they are
listed.
Critical Factor
The closed fiscal year in FI cannot be larger than the last closed fiscal year in Asset Accounting. If
you do not adhere to this guideline, the following problems can result: Recalculation of depreciation
is no longer possible, but is nonetheless required, and error messages are therefore issued.
Recalculation of depreciation is also triggered, for example, when changes are made to the asset
master record (for example, to the cost center or even to texts). These changes are then sometimes
no longer possible, since in certain cases the depreciation recalculation is triggered. Reconciliation
differences occur due to being unable to run the depreciation recalculation.
Background
For more detailed information, refer to the R/3 Library for Asset Accounting or the online
documentation for Asset Accounting. Additional information is also found in the Euro Support
Guide.
Critical Factor
Errors in Customizing of depreciation areas, transaction types and period rules. These can cause the
following problems:
• Inexplicable error messages are issued when adjustment postings are made, although
nothing was changed in Customizing. A typical example of these error messages is AAPO
176 “Transaction type XY cannot be used for activity Z.”
• Transfer postings cannot be carried out.
• Differences occur due to missing account assignments.
• When depreciation is recalculated, there are inexplicable error messages, such as AA641.
Background
The implementation of Support Packages does not change customer-specific settings, although this
may be necessary in a few, well-documented cases. You have to make these settings manually. In
addition, old Customizing settings (for example, investment support measures) are not reset or only
partially reset, and their completeness is checked by the year-end closing program.
Critical Factor
Incomplete assets prevent the year-end closing from being made. The system lists these assets in an
error log, with the request for them to be processed.
Background
Incomplete assets can be created, for example, when the user lacks authorization for master data
fields that are required entry fields, but these are not so critical that the asset cannot be created at
all. The system sets an indicator showing that assets are incomplete. Another reason could be that
the screen layout rule of the asset is changed, and a field that has no entry is now designated as a
required entry field. When changes are made to assets so that they are no longer incomplete, the
system does not automatically reset this indicator. However, the indicator can be removed by the
report. For assets that are still incomplete when the report is run, you can go directly from the report
to their asset master records and correct them, as long as this is allowed by your authorization
profile.
4. Check Indexes
Critical Factor
Missing indexes can lead to the following errors:
• Insurable values are not updated. Later calculations in closed fiscal years can only be made
using a report.
• If entries are missing, it may not be possible to carry out the fiscal year change.
• If entries are missing, it may not be possible to carry out the recalculation of depreciation,
and the assets affected are flagged.
• Inexplicable error messages might be issued when there are certain combinations of settings.
One of these might be AA609 “Depreciation area XY not created in comp.code”, although
this area does not exist.
Background
Calculation and carryforward of indexed values, above all insurable values, takes place solely
during the fiscal year change. If the indexes are not up-to-date at that point, the fiscal year can still
be closed. But calculations from that point on can only be made using a special report.
5. Recalculate Depreciation
Critical Factor
Not recalculating depreciation can lead to the following errors:
• Values are not calculated correctly. This results in an incorrect display in the asset value
display transaction.
• Differences between the general ledger and subsidiary ledger are possible.
• In the new fiscal year, there are assets with the message “Depreciation values not completely
calculated for this asset“ (error message AA510). Recalculation at this point often does not
correct the error.
• Assets with indexed depreciation areas are possibly not deactivated in the case of a complete
retirement, if the calculation of replacement values was not up-to-date.
Start the depreciation recalculation program for the whole company code, for which the year-end
closing is to be carried out. Execute report RAAFAR00 in test mode with the List assets and
Execute in Background options. When you run RAAFAR00, a statistical log is issued. The log
contains any error messages. Correct the errors leading to any error messages you receive, and start
an update run of report RAAFAR00 for these assets.
Background
Under certain circumstances, such as those listed below, depreciation values are not updated in the
depreciation areas of some assets:
• You have changed depreciation keys. This is especially important in the case of unit-of-
production depreciation, where it is essential that you recalculate depreciation after
maintaining the current parameters.
• You have made mass changes that you programmed yourself, and these changes affected
data relevant to depreciation.
• You still want to calculate subsequent revaluation (after the legacy data transfer is closed)
using current index figures. In order to correctly calculate replacement values, however, you
can only use index series that calculate historically.
IMPORTANT: Up to and including this step, you can repeat all activities as often as necessary to
ensure that the system is up-to-date. However, in the case of the following steps, you have to
consider more carefully the individual planning and regulations within your enterprise, for example,
whether you post depreciation once a year or once a month, and so on.
Starting with this step, you begin preparing directly for the year-end closing. You can only carry out
the processes and activities described below when the year-end closing is imminent and is about to
really be carried out. Nonetheless, we recommend carrying out the depreciation posting run
RAPOST2000 in test mode beforehand, to catch possible errors.
Critical Factor
It is not possible to carry out the year-end closing without first performing the depreciation posting
run for the last period of the fiscal year.
Critical Factor
Unless the periodic posting of balance sheet values is current, it is not possible to carry out the year-
end closing.
Background
The need for the periodic posting program is based both on accounting necessities as well as a
technical restriction in releases previous to 5.0 and before the implementation of the New G/L (as of
release 5.0 the New G/L functionality allows “direct posting” for more than one area). From an
accounting perspective, it is necessary in order to be able to make available the current status of all
depreciation areas on a given key date. It is important to keep in mind here that the year-end closing
report checks the date of the last periodic posting program run using the system date as a reference.
As a result, the year-end closing can only be carried out at a time close to the end of the year. In
addition, the periodic balance sheet postings are an important step before the reconciliation of the
general ledger and subsidiary ledger for the individual depreciation areas, since this is the only way
for them to be in agreement. Therefore RAPER2000 has to be executed at least once in update
mode. Also in case the New G/L functionality is used (more than 1 area post directly),
RAPERB2000 can be necessary to “catch-up” and post missing “online” postings in areas defined
as to post directly due to errors.
Critical Factor
The values in Asset Accounting do not agree with the balances of the general ledger accounts. As
possible consequences, the external auditor might not be able to certify the closing, or it may not be
possible for the closing to be submitted to tax authorities.
1. Start report RAABST02. If the report logs differences in table EWUFI_BAL (table
FAGLFLEXD if the New G/L functionality is active) , proceed with the following steps. If the
report does not find any differences, the general ledger and subsidiary ledger are consistent to each
other.
2. For the account concerned, compare the last two fiscal years using the account display
transaction (FS10N or FAGLB03 in New G/L) in the General Ledger. If the closing balance and
opening balance differ, you have to start the balance carryforward program again for the current
year.
3. Create two asset history sheets for the accounts involved using the following parameters:
• Limiting the account assignment or the asset class in the dynamic selections
• Sort version 0020
• Group totals
• Report date – fiscal year end of prior year and current year
• Setting “Depreciation posted” If the starting and final value of the asset history sheets are
different, you should repeat the fiscal year change in asset accounting ( transaction AJRW).
If the starting and final values are still different after you repeat the fiscal year change, then check
to see if there is an asset with a capitalization date but without acquisition data. Follow the
procedure outlined in SAP Note 194635.
4. The asset history sheet for the previous year does not agree within itself when you cross-foot. In
this case:
a) Start RAABST01 for accounts with line item management.
b) Start RAABST02 for reports without line item management.
c) If the balance carryforward is affected, you now have to reset the year-end closing, perform
depreciation recalculation, possibly carry out a depreciation posting run, and then run the year-end
closing again.
5. The starting balance values of the current year do not agree with the value of the balance display.
There are various possible causes, that then also require different actions on your part.
a) The difference arose already during the legacy data transfer. In this case, contact SAP Remote
Consulting.
b) Missing line items. To see which line items are involved, see the log of RAABST01 or
RAABST02. There are two possible scenarios:
• Missing line items during asset acquisition. These can be created easily using report
RACORR05. In the case of multiple account assignments, use report RACORR05A.
• Missing line items during asset retirement. These can not be created using report
RACORR05. In this case, contact SAP R/3 Support, describing the exact parameters of the
asset concerned.
c) Line items with incorrect acquisition year. This situation is found at times with postings from
invoice verification (transactions MRHR or MIGO). For correcting this problem, there are a number
of correction reports that are listed in SAP Note 366848. If you are unsure of how to proceed,
contact SAP Support.
d) Account determinations that have errors or are incomplete can also cause differences, which
cause errors during the euro conversion, if not before. For these errors, you should now, at the latest,
consider your results from point 2.
e) Manual postings to asset balance sheet accounts. In this case, contact SAP Remote Consulting,
with the document numbers involved.
Background
For further Background information and hints on the reports that can be used for reconciliation,
refer to SAP Note 382548. The procedure for reconciling the subsidiary ledger and general ledger is
described in SAP Note 104567, point 3. Information specific to the local currency changeover in the
euro conversion is not relevant for routine preparations for closing. Keep in mind, that certain items
in the asset history sheet, such as down payments and APC, can be added together, although they
can be assigned to different accounts.
Executing the fiscal year change program is an optional step in the course of the year-end closing. It
is not necessary in order to carry out the year-end closing.
Critical Factor
Posting in a given fiscal year is only possible in Asset Accounting when totals segments have been
created for the year. These are created by report RAJAWE00, which serves a technical purpose only
and has no business or accounting purpose.
Background
The fiscal year change report RAJAWE00 creates totals segments in Asset Accounting with values
such as accumulated ordinary depreciation, accumulated special depreciation, planned depreciation
of the current year, and so on. Only after these are created can postings affecting asset balance sheet
values be made.
Part 2: Execute Year-End Closing Program
Once these preparatory tasks have been completed, you can then carry out the year-end closing in
Asset Accounting.
Critical Factor
Closing the general ledger before closing asset accounting violates generally accepted accounting
principles. Not only that, but a missing year-end closing in asset accounting, when the fiscal year is
already closed in FI, leads among other problems to no longer being able to change asset master
records.
Background
As part of a sequence of postings and master record changes, a depreciation recalculation is
triggered and checks are performed into the last fiscal year that is still open in Asset Accounting. If
the system then determines that it is no longer possible to post depreciation to the general ledger, all
further processing terminates and the system issues an error message.