Você está na página 1de 1

DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDERS

 Otis & Co. vs Pennsylvania R. Co., et al, 61 F. SUPP. 905


 Montelibano, et, al, vs. Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co. Inc 5 SCRA 36
 Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc,. vs,. CA, 281 SCRA 232
 Litwin (Rosmarine, et, al.Interveners vsAllen, et, al, 25 N.Y.S. 2d 667
 Walker vs. Man, et, al, 253 NYS 458
 Steinberg vs. Velasco, 52 Phil 953
 Barnes vs. Andrews , 298 F. 614
 Pool vs. Pool, et, al 22 SO 2d 131
 Foster vs. Bowen, et al, 41 NE 2d 181
 Lowell Hoit & Co., vs Detig, et al,50 N.E. 2d 602
 Dates vs. Dresser, 251 US 524
 Palting vs. San Jose Petroleum, Inc., 18 SCRA 924
 Mead vs. E.C., McCulough, et al, 21 Pihl 95
 Piccard vs. Sperry Corporation, et al, 48 F. Suppl. 465
 Government of zthe Philippines vs. El Hogar Filipino, 50 Phil 399
 Barretto vs. La Previsora Filipina, 57 Phil 649
 Central Cooperative Exchange , Inc, Tibe,33 SCRA 593
 Fogelson vs. America Woolen Co., 170 F. 2D 560
 Kerb vs. California Eastern Airways, 90 A 2d 652
 Strong, et al vs. Guttierrez Repide, 41 Phil 927
 Taylor vs. Wright, 159 P. 2d 980
 Gokongwei vs. SEC, 89 SCRA 336
 Singer vs. Cartisle, 26 NYS 2d 172
 Irving Trust Co., vs, Deutsch, 73 F 2d 121
 Globe Co. vs. Utica Gas & Electric Co. 121 NE 378
 Insuranshare Corporation vs. Northern Fiscal, 35 F. Supp. 22