Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
(FACT-R) was created by Peterson, Dunn and Carruthers (1983), but later revised by
Burlingame. Burlingame is also the primary author for the assessment manual (pg. 364). This
assessment was originally designed to be used by RTs who lacked formal training. The test
helps guide the recreation specialist in the identification of an appropriate direction for
treatment.They believed that they only needed to have basic knowledge on observing and
documenting functional skills to administer patients. This assessment was mainly intended for
adults in the VA, but is now used more broadly. Decision making ability were switched in the
revised version of the FACTR-R to place it where they are more clearly matched with.
The FACTR- R develops a broad standardized test mainly for the purpose to assist the
Recreational Therapist in identifying which domain a patient lacks in the most. It also provides
advice on how recreational therapy services can robust the insufficient domain of the client with
the help of other assessments to gain reliability and validity. It is not a test that is administer to
the client, rather utilized after observations and after reviewing the patient's medical record. In
other words, the assessment will develop a scope that will identify a category score only if one
or more categories are extremely low or high. This will help indicate what behaviors or skills
needs improvement.
Recreation, Revised is to determine clients needs related to his/her basic functional skills and
behavior. It measures the cognitive, physical and emotional health for each client after
observing them in a variety of activities. This tool may be used for initial screening, but it is more
commonly used after a client goes through a variety of different activities for each of the
domains. This will help guide the Recreational Therapist to identify if any further testing is
needed. An intervention to the domain with the lowest score will be conducted to best suit the
clients needs. Through the variety of techniques and strategies like observation and
communication, a CTRS can provide useful and accurate information from their procedures. The
fundamental purpose to this assessment tool follows most tests measuring functional skills,
which is to identify the underlying causes of suboptimal performance, followed by the possible
The suggested levels this population is aimed for includes clients at Rancho Los Amigos:
Level 3 and above which describe patients needing total assistance, developmental Level 10
years and above, and clients that have reality orientation issues severe and above.
The assessment is used for all groups of people with the developmental levels over the age of
ten. This assessment is used after reviewing the clients medical chart and after observing the
The length to administer and score this assessment should take around 20 minutes. This
test should be done after observing the client in many group activities and looking over the
clients chart. It measures the functional skills of the three behavioral categories physical,
cognitive, and social/emotional domains. This assessment identifies functional behaviors that
are related to leisure participation. Low scores in any of these three domains will indicate that
the client is in need of a clinical program intervention. These domains also represent the
illnesses and disabilities through the client’s ability, skills, and behaviors; which identifies the
In scoring the assessment the therapist needs to follow standard procedure. To acquire
scores that are reliable, the therapist should define the item being measured with a descriptive
statement that is influenced from other assessments. In other words, all measuring items should
have a description and the definition of an item is highly recommend to fully identify domain
needs. The therapist marks an “X” next to the item description where it best describes the
patient’s functional behavior. After noting the items that best describe the patient, the therapist
should consider if the client would benefit from recreational therapy. If the answer is yes, an “X”
is marked in the category where the patient requires an intervention and can benefit from
recreation therapy assistance. After tallying up the yes’s and the no’s, the “no” responses
indicate functional ability and is not in need of recreational therapy. In other words, high scores
of no’s indicate good functional ability, where low scores indicate problems in functional areas.
Thus, the lower the scores of the patient, the greater the patient will benefit from recreational
therapy. This assessment can be obtained from Idyll Arbor, Inc, and found online at
www.IdyllArbor.com.
Works Cited