Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
136 to 142
#2006 The Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan
The equilibria of yttrium(III) and europium(III) (RE) extraction with PC-88A dissolved in Shellsol D70 from nitric acid solutions were
studied under nonideal conditions in order to develop a chemically-based model enabling the engineering prediction of the equilibrium
distribution ratios. The distribution of the extractant between the nitrate solution and the diluent was also examined. As a result, it was found that
(i) the majority of PC-88A is dimerized in the organic phase, (ii) the cation exchange extraction is predominant in the low-acidity region, and (iii)
solvation extraction becomes appreciable in the high-acidity region. By using a model that considers these two extraction equilibria together
with the complexation of the RE with NO3 , the nonideality of the PC-88A dimer, and the competing extraction of HNO3 , the extraction
equilibrium constants and the coefficient for the effective concentration of the extractant were determined by the nonlinear least-squares method.
The proposed model can reproduce the experimental data with good accuracy for single-metal systems over wide feed concentration ranges of
RE up to 0.1 kmolm3 , nitric acid (0.05 to 3 kmolm3 ), and the extractant (0.25 to 1 kmolm3 ). Its applicability to the prediction of the
extraction from a binary metal system was also confirmed.
(Received May 10, 2005; Accepted October 28, 2005; Published January 15, 2006)
Keywords: solvent extraction, yttrium, europium, PC-88A, modeling, nitric acid
slowly dissolving the desired amount of RE2 O3 (Wako, (2) Distribution of monomeric PC-88A into the aqueous
99.99% purity, RE ¼ Y or Eu) into excess concentrated nitric phase
acid heated at 423 K, followed by the removal of the excess Kd
acid by evaporation and then by dilution with 0.1 kmolm3 HR
HR ð2Þ
nitric acid. Aqueous working solutions were prepared by (3) Dissociation of PC-88A in the aqueous phase
appropriately diluting the stock solution with nitric acid of Ka
different concentrations for the feed concentrations of HR
Hþ þ R ð3Þ
RE(NO3 )3 from 0.005 to 0.5 kmolm3 and HNO3 from The total concentrations of PC-88A in the aqueous and
0.05 to 3 kmolm3 . All other chemicals were of reagent organic phases can be expressed using eqs. (4) and (5),
grade. respectively, balanced with the feed concentration of PC-88A
using eq. (6)
2.2 Distribution of PC-88A
½HRt ¼ ½HR þ ½R ¼ Kd ½HRð1 þ Ka =½Hþ Þ ð4Þ
Equal volumes (15 cm3 ) of the organic working solution of
2
a known PC-88A concentration and the aqueous solution of ½HRt ¼ ½HR þ 2½ðHRÞ2 ¼ ½HR þ 2Km ½HR ð5Þ
0.4 kmolm3 (Na,H)NO3 were poured into a 50 cm3 -stop-
½HRf ¼ ½HRt þ ½HRt ð6Þ
pered conical flask and shaken overnight in a thermostatted
waterbath at 298 0:1 K to attain equilibrium. The two where [ ] represents concentration, and the subscripts f and t
phases were then centrifuged and carefully separated by denote the feed and total amounts, respectively.
pipetting. The pH values of the aqueous phases were Figure 1 shows the equilibrium data as a plot of
measured using an HM-60G pH meter (TOA) attached with logf½HRt =ðkmolm3 Þg versus the equilibrium pH for vari-
a glass combination electrode (TOA, GS-5017C) by immers- ous ½HRf values. It can be seen that [HR]t depends on ½HRf
ing the electrode in the solution for 5 min to obtain the stable but is independent of pH, which shows according to eq. (4),
reading. The pH meter was calibrated beforehand by the pH that the dissociation of PC-88A in the aqueous phase can be
standard solutions of 1.7, 4.0, and 6.9. The concentrations of ignored. Thus, [HR]t is approximated as follows:
PC-88A in the aqueous phases were determined by measur-
½HRt
¼ ½HR ¼ Kd ½HR ð7Þ
ing the phosphorus contents with an SPS4000 plasma
spectrometer (Seiko, ICP-AES). Since the amounts of PC- The distribution ratio of PC-88A can be given by combining
88A dissolved in the aqueous phase were low, the method of eqs. (5) and (7):
standard addition was employed to improve the measurement
DHR ¼ ½HRt =½HRt ¼ 1=Kd þ 2ðKm =Kd 2 Þ½HRt ð8Þ
accuracy.11) The concentrations of PC-88A in the organic
phases were calculated by mass balance. With respect to this equation, the plot of DHR vs. [HR]t (the
average value of the data given in Fig. 1) was made for each
2.3 Extraction equilibria of RE ½HRf in Fig. 2. The plotted points lie on a straight line as
The procedure in this experiment was similar to that in the expected by eq. (8). From the slope and intercept of this line,
PC-88A distribution experiment. Equal volumes (15 cm3 ) of the values of Km and Kd were evaluated as shown in Table 1
the aqueous and organic working solutions were continu- together with the constants published in the literature12,14–17)
ously shaken for 3 h at 298 0:1 K to attain equilibrium. for comparison. Unlike di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid
After phase separation, the pH values of the aqueous phases (henceforth D2EHPA), the constants reported for PC-88A
were measured in the same manner as previously described, are very few. The scattering of these values is not small due
and the concentrations of RE in the phases were determined to the use of different aqueous phases and diluents. The
by EDTA titration and by ICP-AES when they were values obtained in the present work are within this range of
relatively high and low, respectively. The concentrations of
RE in the organic phases were also measured by this method
after completely stripping the metal from the organic solution -3.5
into 6 kmolm3 HCl. 0.01
[ HR ] / kmol m-3
f
0.1
-4.0 0.25
3. Results and Discussion
Log ([HR] / kmol m-3)
0.5
0.99
3.1 Distribution of PC-88A -4.5
4.5 5.0
-3 Slope=3
4.0 [ HR ]f / kmol m 3
10-4DHR = 1.4 105 [HR]t / kmol m-3 + 0.0178 4.0
0.25
2.5 0.5
2.0 1.0
HR
2.0
D
1.5 1.0
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0 -1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Aqueous phase Km /
Extractants Diluent Kd Sources
I /kmolm3 Electrolyte (kmolm3 )1
D2EHPA 0.1 (Na,H)NO3 n-heptane 3:16 104 6:25 104 14)
D2EHPA 0.3 (Na,H)Cl Shellsol-K 285 5:9 102 15)
D2EHPA 0.1 (Na,H)ClO4 toluene 1:26 105 1:62 105 16)
D2EHPA 0.1 (Na,H)ClO4 hexane 3:39 104 2:95 105 17)
PC-88A None n-heptane 3:0 103 — 12)
PC-88A 0.4 (Na,H)NO3 Shellsol D70 2:2 104 5:6 103 Present work
: Ionic strength
: Vapor-phase osmometer
Modeling of the Equilibria of Yttrium(III) and Europium(III) Solvent Extraction from Nitric Acid with PC-88A 139
1.0 where Dcalc. and Dexpt. denote the calculated and observed
[ H+ ] / kmol m-3 Slope = 3 distribution ratios of RE, respectively, and N represents the
0.0 f
number of the experimental points.
0.05
-1.0 Three hydrogen ions are discharged into the aqueous phase
0.2
-2.0 0.4
for every RE ion extracted according to eq. (9). However, the
LogD -3pHa
3.0 4.0
[ M3+ ]f / kmol m-3
-3
[ HR ]f / kmol m
3.0 0.01
2.0 0.25
0.1
0.5
1.0 2.0 0.01
1.0 0.1
1.0
Log D
Log D
0.0
0.0
-1.0
-1.0
-2.0
-2.0
-3.0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -3.0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
pH
a pH
a
3.0 -0.4
[ HR ] / kmol m -3 -0.6
2.0 f
0.25
-0.8
0.5
1.0
1.0 -1.0
Log D
0.0 -1.2
Log D
-3.0 -2.0
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-4.0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 pH
a
pH
a
Fig. 8 Distribution ratio of Y vs. pHa in the Y(NO3 )3 system for different
[Y3þ ]f . ½HRf ¼ 0:5 kmolm3 . ½Hþ f ¼ 0:07{3 kmolm3 . Curves de-
Fig. 6 Effect of the equilibrium pHa on the distribution ratio of Eu. The note the calculated values.
curves denote the calculated values. ½Eu3þ f ¼ 0:005 kmolm3 , ½Hþ f ¼
0:07{3 kmolm3 .
K2 / KH / 1 /
Systems K1 n ðDÞ
(kmolm3 )ð3þnÞ (kmolm3 )2 (kmolm3 )1
Y(NO3 )3 (42.1) 0.36 2 0.25 (0.631) 0.178
Eu(NO3 )3 0.49 0.20 2 0.25 (1.995) 0.235
The constants in parentheses were obtained before this analysis.
approach for the engineering purpose. In this viewpoint, kmolm3 [M3þ ]f as shown in Fig. 7, but are greater than
the constants shown in Table 2 are specific and should be the calculated values in the case of ½Y3þ f ¼ 0:25 to
used in caution. 0.5 kmolm3 as shown in Fig. 8 for the Y(NO3 )3 system
as an example. These results indicate that the model is
3.3 Applicalility of model for different metal concen- applicable for the feed RE concentrations at least up to
trations 0.1 kmolm3 and the constants in Table 2 are valid for the
The applicability of the proposed model was examined for aqueous phase at the ionic strength up to 3.5 kmolm3 . The
different feed concentrations of RE extending from 0.01 to deviation from the observed data at high [M3þ ]f , correspond-
0.5 kmolm3 as a function of the initial aqueous acidity at ing to a high loading ratio, is probably due to the change in
½HRf ¼ 0:5 kmolm3 . The observed distribution ratios the activity coefficient of the RE ion and the formation of
cluster on the respective calculated curves up to 0.1 polymeric metal-extracted complexes:7,24)
Modeling of the Equilibria of Yttrium(III) and Europium(III) Solvent Extraction from Nitric Acid with PC-88A 141
3.0 2.0
[ HR ]f / kmol m-3
[ HR ] / kmol m-3
2.0 0.25 1.0 f
0.5 0.25
1.0 0.5
1.0 0.0 1.0
Log D
Log D
0.0 -1.0
-1.0 -2.0
-2.0 -3.0
-3.0 -4.0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
pH
pH a
a
Extr. Ion Exch. 17 (1999) 277–300. 16) D. H. Liem: Acta Chem. Scand. 26 (1972) 191–204.
8) T. G. Lenz and M. Smutz: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 30 (1968) 621–637. 17) V. S. Ul’yanov and R. A. Sviridova: Radiokhimiya 12 (1970) 47–64.
9) Y. Hirashima, M. Mugita and J. Shiokawa: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 37 18) Y. Hirashima, Y. Yamamoto, S. Takagi, T. Amano and J. Shiokawa:
(1975) 1249–1253. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 51 (1978) 2890–2893.
10) A. Hino, S. Nishihama, T. Hirai and I. Komasawa: J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 19) T. Sato and M. Ueda: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35 (1973) 1003–1010.
30 (1997) 1040–1046. 20) P. R. Danesi and G. F. Vandegrift: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 17 (1981)
11) I. M. Kolthoff: Quantitative Chem. Analysis, (Macmillan Co.: London, 109–115.
1969) pp. 32–35. 21) S. Kotrly and L. Sucha: Handbook Chem. Equi. Anal. Chem, (Ellis
12) F. Nakashio, K. Kondo, A. Murakami and Y. Akiyoshi: J. Chem. Eng. Horwood Limited: New York, 1985) 116, 131.
Jpn. 15 (1982) 274–279. 22) D. F. Peppard and J. R. Ferraro: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 15 (1960) 365–
13) E. Ma, X. Yan, S. Wang, H. Long and C. Yuan: Scientia Sinica XXIV 370.
(1981) 1237–1247. 23) D. Li, X. Wan, D. Lin, Y. Xie, S. Lin, Z. Wang, H. Li and E. Ji:
14) I. Komasawa, T. Otake and Y. Higaki: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 43 (1981) Proceedings of the International Solvent Extraction Conference, ISEC
3351–3356. 1980, (Liege, Belgium, Sept. 6–12, 1980), Vol. 3, pp. 1–10.
15) M. Imai and S. Furusaki: Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 11 (1985) 515– 24) Y. Hirashima, H. Kodera and J. Shiokawa: Nippon Kagakukaishi
519. (1982) 627–631.