Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PSCAD MODEL
Consider the PSCAD design of 2-level VSC connected to 66kV network shown in Fig. 1.
The converter is controlled by a PWM controller. The modulation index (m) and the phase angle (φ) can
be adjusted with the configuration shown in Fig. 2.
CALCULATION
To determine the modulation index and the phase angle w.r.t. the infinite bus network, consider the single
line diagram shown in Fig. 1.
Considering the secondary side of the transformer, active and reactive power transmitted can be
expressed as,
Vs ×Vc ×sin(φ) Vs ×Vc ×cos(φ)− V2s
Active Power (P) = X
Reactive Power(Q) = X
Where,
Vs – L-L rms voltage at of the source
Vc – L-L rms voltage of the converter output w.r.t. to the transformer secondary side.
X – Xtransformer + Xtransmission line
φ – angle of Vc with respect to Vs
Considering the converter side, the modulation index of the 2-level VSC can be determined as,
Vc_peak
m=
Vd /2
Where,
Vc_peak – peak value of the line to neutral voltage of the converter
Vd - input DC voltage
(i) CASE A
CALCULATION
Substituting φ = 0 in Q,
66 × Vc × cos(φ) − 662
Q = Q total + Q filter =
93.3671
66 × Vc × cos(φ) − 662
0−3=
93.3671
Vc = 61.7560 kV
Obtaining the primary equivalent voltage of Vc and then the peak value of L-N,
9.8 √2
Vc_peak Vc × 66 ×
m= = √3 = 61.7560 × 0.1212 = 0.7881
Vd /2 9.5 9.5
When P =0 MW and Qtot = 0 Mvar, the calculated modulation index and the phase angle are,
m = 0.7881 𝛗 = 0 rad
PSCAD SIMULATION RESULTS
OBSERVATION
The desired values are P=0 and Q = 0. The simulation results in Fig. 4show oscillation of Q
around zero and P slightly above zero. With the absence of load inductances, this
oscillations are possible.
(ii) CASE B
CALCULATION
9.8 √2
Vc_peak Vc × 66 ×
m= = √3 = 81.0046 × 0.1212 = 1.0334
Vd /2 9.5 9.5
When P = 20 MW and Qtot = 10 Mvar, the calculated modulation index and the phase angle are,
(iii) CASE 3
CALCULATION
P= 0 MW Qtotal = -30 Mvar Vs = 66 kV X = 93.3671 ohm
66 × Vc ×sin(φ )
P= =0
93.3671
φ = 0 rad
Substituting φ = 0 in Q,
66 × Vc × cos(φ) − 662
Q = Q total + Q filter =
93.3671
66 × Vc × 1 −662
−30 − 3 =
93.3671
Vc = 19.3165 kV
Obtaining the primary equivalent voltage of Vc and then the peak value of L-N,
9.8 √2
Vc_peak Vc × 66 ×
m= = √3 = 19.3165 × 0.1212 = 0.2465
Vd /2 9.5 9.5
When P =0 MW and Qtot = 0 Mvar, the calculated modulation index and the phase angle are,
m = 0.2465 𝛗 = 0 rad
OBSERVATION
Q has achieved -30 MVar and P is slightly below 10 MW.
QUESTION 2
(i) PART A
N = 10 SMs per arm m = 0.9 Base frequency (fr) = 60 Hz Switching frequency (fc) =900 Hz
0.8941
MATLAB CODE
%Design parameters of the PD PWM
m=0.9; fr=60; Tr=1/fr; wr=2*pi*fr; fc=900; Tc=(1/fc);
t=0:0.000001:Tr; %Period of the reference signal
ref= m*sin(wr*t); %Reference signal
carrier=((2/N)*0.5*(sawtooth(2*pi*fc*t,0.5)+1)+(2/N)*(K_sub-1));
% harmonics generation
t2=0:1:len_r;
fft_pwm=fft(pwm);
%normalizing fft through number of sample points
%determine the absolute value of complex number
fft_pwm2=abs(fft_pwm)*2/len_r;
%THD calculation
THD=sqrt(Sum_amp)*100/m;
bar(t2,fft_pwm2);
xlim([0 50]); grid
set(gca,'XTick',(1:1:50));
set(gca,'YTick',(0:0.025:1.5))
title(['%THD = ', num2str(THD),'%'])
xlabel('Harmonic number');
ylabel('Amplitude');
(ii) PART B
N = 5-20 SMs per arm m = 0.9 Base frequency (fr) = 60 Hz Switching frequency (fc) =900 Hz
MATLAB CODE
%Design parameters of the PD PWM
m=0.9; fr=60; Tr=1/fr; wr=2*pi*fr; fc=900; Tc=(1/fc);
t=0:0.000001:Tr; %Period of the reference signal
ref= m*sin(wr*t); %Reference signal
valueofC=zeros(1,21);
len_r=length(t); %Sampling period
for N=5:20;
%Generate PD PWM signal
for K_sub=((-N/2)+1):(N/2)
%carrier signal is generated from the lowest level to highest and then
%compared with the reference signal.
carrier=((2/N)*0.5*(sawtooth(2*pi*fc*t,0.5)+1)+(2/N)*(K_sub-1));
%THD calculation
THD=sqrt(Sum_amp)*100/m;
%obtain an array of THD corresponding to N
valueofC(N)=THD;
end
bar(valueofC);
xlim([4 21]); grid on
set(gca,'XTick',(0:1:21));
set(gca,'YTick',(0:4:30));
xlabel('Number of SMs');
ylabel('%THD');
title('%THD of the output phase voltage vs N');
text(1:length(valueofC),valueofC,num2str(valueofC'),'vert','bottom','horiz','center');
box off
(iii) PART C
N = 2-10 SMs per arm m = 0.9 Base frequency (fr) = 60 Hz Switching frequency (fc) =180 Hz
(iv) CONCLUSION
Modular Multilevel Converters (MMC) is a fast-developing topology in high power and high voltage
applications such as VSC-HVDC applications. The basic building block of the MMC is known as Sub Module
(SM). The switching signal is provided for each SM individually. By providing switching signal to the SMs
in each phase arm of the MMC, the SMs can be either inserted or bypassed. By properly inserting or
bypassing the SMs, the desired ac side voltage can be achieved.
Here, Phase Disposition PWM (PD PWM) switching method is considered as the switching method for SM
operation. PD PWM switching method was analysed for different conditions.
Part a – Harmonic spectrum and %THD of output phase voltage for a fixed number of SMs
Part b – THD of output phase voltage variation for different number of SMs
Part c – Decrease the switching frequency and obtain the variation of fundamental component of
output phase voltage
From the Fig. 7, it is clearly observed that even harmonics are negligible and only odd harmonics are
present. The harmonic content is located at low frequencies. According to Fig. 7, highest harmonic content
is located at f=15f0, where f0 is the fundamental frequency. The magnitudes of the harmonics are obtained
to an array for further clarification.
√∑∞ 2
n=2 Vn−rms
THD% = Vfund−rms
Where,
According to the Fig. 8, THD of the output phase voltage decreases with the increment of the number of
SMs. When the number of SMs =5, THD is 24.16% and then SMs are increased to 20, THD has dropped
significantly to 5.17%. Therefore, number of levels in MMC mainly impact on harmonic content.
According to the Fig. 6, the fundamental component of output phase voltage has been increased gradually
until SMs=6 and then the fundamental component has been decreased. However, when the number of
SMs=4 and above, the magnitude of the resulted fundamental components is above the magnitude of the
reference signal which is 0.9.
So, it can be concluded that PD PWM switching method is reasonable for high level MMC applications due
to the reduction of THD.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Yuan, P. Li, X. Kong, J. Liu, L. Qun and Y. Wang, "Harmonic influance analysis of unified power flow
controller based on modular multilevel converter," Journal of modern power systems and clean
energy, pp. 10-18, 2016.
[2] K. Sharifabadi, L. Harnefors, H.-P. Nee, S. Norrga and R. Teodorescu, "Design, control and
application of Modular Multilevel Converters for HVDC Transmision systems," John Wiley and Sons
Ltd, 2016.
ECE 8320 - MODULAR MULTILEVEL CONVERTERS
Assignment 1