Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
by
Thomas Zinninger
August 2013
University of Cincinnati
College-Conservatory of Music
ABSTRACT
This study examines concert saxophone vibrato through the analysis of several
Arno Bornkamp, Claude Delangle, Jean-Marie Londeix, Marcel Mule, Otis Murphy,
Sigurd Rascher, and Eugene Rousseau is analyzed with regards to rate, extent, shape, and
discretionary use. Examination of these parameters was conducted through both general
observation and precise measurements with the aid of a spectrogram. Statistical analyses
of the results provide tendencies for overall vibrato use, as well as the effects of certain
musical attributes (note length, tempo, dynamic, range) on vibrato. The results of this
analysis are also compared among each soloist and against pre-existing theories or
ii
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
PART 1: BACKGROUND
Introduction 1
Need for Study 2
Similar Studies 3
Vibrato in Music 15
Continuous or Ornamental? 15
Emotion, Stress, and Musical Structure 19
Saxophone Vibrato 22
Origins 23
Modern Vibrato 27
Pedagogy 29
General Analysis 44
Vibrato Use and Non-Use 44
Vibrato Rate and Extent 54
Note Length 58
Tempo 69
Dynamic 81
Range 93
Vibrato Shape 106
Variance Above and Below Pitch 109
iv
Hindemith 120
Ibert 122
Maurice 125
Conclusions 128
Overall Significant Findings 128
Tendencies by Each Soloist 129
Generational and Geographical Trends 131
Significance of Findings 133
Bibliography 135
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 6 Mean Change in Rate and Extent for Each Soloists 109
Table 7 Mean Vibrato Extent Above and Below the Intended Pitch 111
Table 16 Mean Rate and Extent for all Soloists, Grouped by 132
Generation
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 10 Vibrato Use Percentages for Tempos Less Than 100 bpm 53
Figure 11 Vibrato Use Percentages for Tempos Greater Than 100 bpm 53
vii
viii
Figure 86 Mean Vibrato Extent Above and Below the Intended Pitch 111
for Each Soloist
ix
PART 1: BACKGROUND
Introduction
The etymology of the word “saxophone” is simple. There is “sax,” from its
Belgian inventor Adolphe Sax, and “phone,” which is often defined as: “a sound, esp.
from the voice.”1 It is appropriate that Sax used this word when he named his invention
as many believe it to be the closest of all wind instruments to the human voice. The
Cambridge Companion to the Saxophone even begins with Thomas Liley describing the
acoustical evidence. The sounds of both the saxophone and the average human voice
However, the similarity may best be illustrated by the “vocal” manner in which the
Marcel Mule once claimed that it was the vocal-like eloquence of the saxophone
that led to its popularity.4 One of the most important factors in this vocal quality is the
extensive use of vibrato by saxophonists of the past 80-90 years. It is rare to hear a live
lacks the use of vibrato. There are certainly individual jazz performers who play with
little to no vibrato, and several contemporary classical works call for a “straight” tone
1
Thomas Liley, “Invention and Development,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Saxophone,
ed. Richard Ingham (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 1.
2
Ibid.
3
Claude Delangle and Jean-Denis Michat, “The Contemporary Saxophone,” in The Cambridge
Companion to the Saxophone, ed. Richard Ingham (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 163.
4
Claude Delangle, “Interview with the Legendary Marcel Mule on the History of Saxophone
Vibrato,” Australian Clarinet and Saxophone (March 1998), trans. Huguette Brassine, 7.
1
quality, but these are undoubtedly considered the exceptions rather than the rule. In
concert music, which will be the focus of this study, all of the notable recorded
Vibrato has not only been used extensively by concert saxophonists since the
1930s, its existence has been crucial to the musicality and individuality of many notable
performers. Musically, vibrato has been used to manipulate the emotion or tension of
certain notes or passages within a piece. It is also one of the defining characteristics of an
individual’s playing style. The performances of saxophone greats such as Marcel Mule or
Claude Delangle are often instantly recognizable for their distinctive vibrato use. Because
explore and quantify its use. Through analysis, we can gain a better understanding of how
This study analyzes the use of vibrato by eight prominent concert saxophonists
across 28 recordings of standard saxophone repertoire. There were two main objectives
for the analysis. The first was to look for general trends in vibrato use by the performers.
This was best achieved by examining how certain musical attributes such as beat
placement, note length, or dynamic level affected vibrato use. The second objective was
to explore the differences in vibrato use between each performer. The musical attributes’
effects were also considered here as well as the comparison of general trends in each
soloists vibrato.
2
experimentation had both advantages and disadvantages. Measuring the parameters and
shapes of vibrato would have been easier and possibly more accurate if a group of
saxophonists were recorded for the specific purpose of vibrato study. Yet the analysis in
some ways can be of higher quality with “real” commercially available recordings. Each
recording chosen represents a true “performance” for an audience (whether or not it was
the vibrato use should be of the utmost authenticity. Utilizing historical recordings also
studio recordings.
Similar Studies
There have been numerous scientific vibrato studies over the past 80 years. These
have ranged from Carl Seashore’s general study of the phenomenon of vibrato in the
1930s5 to Yoshiyuki Horii’s specific study of vocal vibrato on long tone /a/s in 1989.6
While most vibrato studies have been of a different nature than the one presented here,
there have been a few with similar objectives. One such study, where musical attributes’
effects on vibrato were measured, was conducted by Timmers and Desain in 2000.7 A
cello, oboe, tenor, theremin, and violin were each recorded performing the first phrase of
5
many publications, including: Carl Seashore, The Vibrato (Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1931).
6
Yoshiyuki Horii, “Frequency Modulation Characteristics of Sustained /a/ Sung in Vocal
Vibrato,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32 (December 1989).
7
Renee Timmers and Peter Desain, “Vibrato: Questions and Answers from Musicians and
Science,” Proceedings of the Sixth ICMPC (Keele: 2000).
3
“Le Cygne” by Saint-Saëns. Only professional musicians were utilized. Each recording
was examined through spectral analysis to measure the parameters of the vibrato. The
objective was to find correlation between these parameters and certain musical structures
such as metrical stress (the hierarchy of beat placement within a meter), phrase position,
and melodic charge (a note’s diatonic distance from the tonic). The results were varied
with some musical structures having more effect on vibrato than others and some
instruments being affected more or less than others. The most consistent results were that
increased metric stress had a negative correlation with vibrato rate and positive
how dynamic levels and range affected the vibrato rates and extents of violin and viola
players. Forty-eight university and high school musicians were recorded performing both
scales and musical excerpts. Vibrato rate and extent were measured for each note. She
concluded that dynamic level had a slightly positive influence on vibrato extent but
effected rate only on the scales. Range (pitch height) had a more significant positive
There have been few vibrato studies conducted that actually use commercially
available recordings for analysis. One such study was conducted by Eric Prame in 1993
and used ten professional recordings of Schubert’s Ave Maria.9 Several general
conclusions regarding the vibrato were drawn including that the mean rate was 6.1 Hz
8
Rebecca MacLeod, “Influences of Dynamic Level and Pitch Height on the Vibrato Rates and
idths of Violin and Viola Players,” PhD diss., Florida State University, 2006.
9
Eric Prame, “Measurements of the Vibrato Rate of Ten Singers,” KTH Computer Science and
Communication. Department for Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report 33, no.
4 (1992).
4
and that the vibrato typically increased at the end of long tones. Another study using
Notes were selected from ten recordings of an aria from Verdi’s Aida by notable
sopranos. Two sustained pitches with crescendos were analyzed with regards to
fundamental frequency, vibrato rate, vibrato extent, intonation, and sound level. The
objective was to observe how the crescendo affected these parameters and the
relationships between the parameters. As with Prame’s study, it was found that vibrato
The only known significant scientific vibrato study exclusively focused on the
saxophone was conducted by Gilbert, Simon, and Terroir in 2005.11 The primary
objective of this study was to create a mathematical model that could differentiate
between two different types of vibrato (jaw and air pressure) used by saxophonists. While
it possibly had some interest to musicians, the study mostly focused on creating the
mathematical model and made no mention of how each type of vibrato has been used in a
musical context.
10
Jose Bretos and Johan Sundberg, ”Measurements of Vibrato Parameters in Long Sustained
Crescendo Notes as Sung by Ten Sopranos,” Journal of Voice 17, no.3 (September 2003): 343-352.
11
J. Gilbert, L. Simon, and J. Terroir, “Vibrato of Saxophones,” Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America 118, No. 4 (October 2005), 2649-2655.
5
shifts leading to the enrichment in tone.13 We know that these oscillations are the direct
cause of vibrato, but how did musicians begin to use them in the first place? Some
believe this did not happen by chance. They believe that vibrato is very much a part of
nature. This sentiment also gives credence to the notion that vibrato is first and foremost
a vocal phenomenon.
A Vocal Phenomenon
The theory that vibrato is a naturally occurring phenomenon in the human singing
voice has sparked much debate among musicologists. While many believe vibrato to be a
strictly stylistic entity learned by developing musicians in imitation of those who came
before them, there is considerable evidence that vibrato—at least in the voice—is a part
of nature. In Carl Seashore’s studies on vibrato in the 1930s, the first significant study of
its kind, he provided several observations that suggested vibrato is inherent in the singing
voice. He wrote about the pervasive nature of vibrato claiming that all great singers used
it 95% of the time. He asserted that it is a universal phenomenon as he observed its use in
the music of African and Indian primitive cultures. He also pointed out that vibrato in the
12
Frederick Neumann, “The Vibrato Controvery,” Performance Practice Review 4, no.1 (Spring
1991), 14.
13
Ingo R. Titze, “Getting the Most from the Vocal Instruments in a Choral Setting,” Choral
Journal 49, no. 5 (November 2008), 40.
6
human voice even exists outside the realm of music as it can often be heard in emotional
speech.14
that vibrato may be an innate phenomenon. Most fully developed singers will agree that it
is difficult to sing with a perfectly straight sound. Generally this can only be achieved by
singing with a pressed or breathy tone, techniques which have been deemed improper or
even unhealthy for trained vocalists because they require a high level of muscular
tension.15 Studies have shown that when a voice holds a sustained pitch, a series of
irregular nerve impulses cause muscular tremors to occur in the larynx at the rate of five
to eight times per second. If the vocal folds are making the correct amount of contact,
these muscular tremors will develop into a natural quivering of the tone; hence vibrato is
actually an indication of proper vocal technique.16 Some have taken a more moderate
stance on this subject stating that the muscular tremors do not develop into vibrato on
their own. Instead it has been suggested that vibrato is a learned behavior which allows
also been observed that in most cases vocalists cannot significantly alter their normal
14
Carl E. Seashore, “The Natural History of Vibrato,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 17, no. 12 (December 1931), 623.
15
Julia Davids and Stephen LaTour, Vocal Technique (Lon Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.,
2012), 128.
16
Ibid, 127.
17
Titze, 40.
7
vibrato rate. This is further evidence that involuntary muscular tremors are the origin of
the oscillations.18
Vibrato in the voice has also been deemed natural by some because it helps
eliminate vocal fatigue, especially at louder volume levels. Like other muscles in the
human body, the larynx works best when there are alternating periods of contraction and
relaxation.19 It is also believed that a sustained tone with vibrato allows around 10% more
airflow as opposed to a straight tone with this rate going up as register and loudness
increase. Airflow is reduced when a vocalist sings with a straight tone because glottal
resistance is increased as the muscles are constantly working to inhibit the natural
tremors.20
Parameters
Rate, extent, and shape are the fundamental parameters of vibrato. Rate refers to
the number of oscillations which occur over a period of time and is usually measured in
cycles per second (Hz). Extent refers to the width of vibrato and has a more ambiguous
definition. Since vibrato can consist of oscillations of pitch, loudness, or timbre, extent
can refer to the amount of variance of any, all, or a combination of these. Pitch extent is
the easiest of the three to measure and also has the greatest effect on the overall
18
Jose Antonio Diaz, “A Mathematical Model of Singer’s Vibrato Based on Waveform Analysis,”
PhD diss., University of Florida, 1998, 4.
19
Davids and LaTour, 128.
20
John Large and Shigenobu Iwata, “The Significance of Air Flow Modulations in Vocal
Vibrato,” The NATS Bulletin 32, no. 3 (February/March 1976), 46.
8
perception of oscillation for the listener.21 For these reasons, many studies only attempt to
quantify pitch extent and for the most part ignore the other two. When measuring pitch
variance, the distance from the highest to the lowest pitch within the cycle should be
considered the full extent. This is often measured in semi-tones, but to be more precise
called “amplitude vibrato,” is usually measured as the change in decibels over one cycle
harmonic series for the specific frequency. This is often impossible to quantify in all but
the most controlled environments. There is no standard unit of measurement for timbral
extent. Vibrato shape is the most open ended parameter of vibrato. It can refer to the
change in both rate and extent over the course of any sustained tone. It can also refer to
Over the years, many have attempted to quantify these parameters, or even create
a mathematical model of “proper” vibrato. These vibrato studies have not always yielded
consistent results. In Seashore’s studies, he concluded that the best singers oscillate in
pitch by about a semi-tone (100 cents), and that string players oscillate a quarter-tone (50
cents). Both use a vibrato rate of six to seven cycles per second.22 Other recent studies
using empirical data collection include those by Prame and Horii. Prame recorded a mean
vibrato rate of 6.1 Hz on his studies of Shubert’s Ave Maria. He found that the average
rate variation for all notes measured for a single vocalist was around 10% while the
average variation across all of the ten vocalists he studied was also 10%. Prame’s
21
Peter Desain, Hankjan Honing, Rinus Aarts, and Renee Timmers, “Rhythmic Aspects of
Vibrato,” in Rhytm Perception and Production, ed. by Peter Desain and Luke Windsor, 203-216, (Lisse:
Swerts & Zeitlinger, 2000), 203.
22
Seashore, “The Natural History…,” 623.
9
findings for extent varied between 57 and 87 cents, with a mean of 71, slightly smaller
than the typical extent described by Seashore.23 Horii studied vocalists simply sustaining
long tones and found that rates could range from three to ten Hz, but most fell between
five and six. He also found a pitch extent of 50 to 200 cents.24 In another study, Horii
discussed the inconsistencies when measuring amplitude vibrato. He found that a 2-3 dB
fluctuation is most typical, but as much an 8-10 dB fluctuation has been reported by
others.25
We can also look to various pedagogical studies to find suggestions of the proper
parameters for vibrato. Ingo Titze states that acceptable vibrato rates fall between 4.5 and
6.5 Hz for vocalists in a choral setting. Congruent with Seashore’s findings, he gives 100
cents as a rough guide for extent.26 In the book Vocal Technique by Davids and LaTour,
the authors suggest a wider range for rate, contending that the rate of vibrato should fall
in the same range as the involuntary muscular pulses. These happen five to eight times
per second. They recommend a pitch extent of 100 to 200 cents.27 While trying to create a
mathematical model of proper vocal vibrato, Diaz determined that vibrato rates should
typically fall between 5.5 and 7.5 Hz with pitch extents between 50 and 200 cents.28
amplitude and pitch vibrato. He described “parallel” vibrato where the variation in pitch
23
Prame, “Measurements of the Vibrato Rate…,” 73.
24
Horii, “Frequency Modulation…,” 829.
25
Yoshiyuki Horii, “Acoustical Analysis of Vocal Vibrato: A Theoretical Interpretation of Data,”
Journal of Voice 3, no. 1 (1989), 36.
26
Titze, 40.
27
Davids and LaTour, 128.
28
Diaz, 4-5.
10
and loudness positively correlate, and “opposite” vibrato where the correlation is
negative. He observed that 40% of vocalists generally use parallel, and 30% use opposite
vibrato. The other 30%, he claimed, did not have a significant enough variation in
Some studies have also attempted to look for trends in vibrato shape. In Horii’s
studies, he concluded that vocal vibrato is usually sinusoidal, but at times can be
trapezoidal. He also observed that the increase in frequency during the vibrato cycle is
generally faster than the decrease.30 He did not discuss whether or not these trends carried
over into instrumental vibrato however. Another study on vibrato shape by Desain,
Honing, Aarts, and Timmers31 found that transitions between notes with vibrato typically
occur in phase for trained musicians. This means that if the note transition is ascending,
the final pitch fluctuation of the first note’s vibrato will end during the ascending portion
of the cycle. They also found that this causes musicians to adjust their rate of vibrato as
not all note lengths will be divisible by a constant rate. This explains why musicians often
increase their vibrato rates toward the end of a note. This technique gives them a better
chance of being in the desired phase for the transition.32 Vibrato rate increasing at the end
of notes, especially in long tones, was also observed by Prame,33 and Bretos and
Sundberg.34 Bretos and Sundberg further qualified their observation, reporting that the
29
Seashore, “The Natural History…,” 625.
30
Horii, “Frequency Modulation…,” 829.
31
Desain, Honing, Aarts, and Timmers, 204.
32
Ibid, 213.
33
Prame, “Measurements of the Vibrato Rate…,” 73.
34
Bretos and Sundberg, 343.
11
vibrato rate increased by an average of 20% from the beginning to the end of a long
tone.35
Perception
measurements do not always correlate with how the listener actually perceives vibrato.
Seashore discussed this at length in the introduction to his findings in 1931. He called
vibrato an “illusion” because we hear the fluctuations as being much less than they really
are, both in pitch and loudness.36 He was also one of the first to describe the concept of
fluctuation of pitch, loudness, or timbre, but instead hears a warmer or richer single
tone.37 Most agree that the parameters of vibrato must be within certain limitations for
true sonance to occur, but the extent of these limitations have often been debated. Some
have even suggested that the entire concept is flawed, and that a listener can always
of the three parameters which make up extent, pitch variance is perceived by the listener
35
Ibid, 347.
36
Carl Seashore, Introduction to The Vibrato (Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1931), 10.
37
Neumann, 15.
38
Frederick K. Gable, “Some Observations Concerning Baroque and Modern Vibrato,”
Performance Practice Review 5, no. 1 (Spring 1992), 100.
12
the most.39 Horii’s research however, has suggested that the listener often perceives a
measurable pitch variation as an amplitude variation.40 Prame provides a reason for this.
modulations of the individual spectrum partials for a tone. This is what causes the
by Robert Donington. He claimed that one of the primary reasons vibrato enriches
musical tone is actually the result of a physical reaction in the listener’s ear. A sustained
static frequency rapidly fatigues the band of fibers in the basilar membrane of the ear
corresponding to the specific sounding pitch. The listener in turn will perceive a decline
in both loudness and colorfulness of the sound. This is why truly static pitches, such as
those produced electronically, sound completely “dead” to us. Vibrato allows the ear to
Of all the known studies on the subject of vibrato, the most common types are
those trying to determine a listener’s perception of pitch within a vibrato tone. One of the
more in depth studies on this topic was conducted by Brown and Vaughn and published
in 1996. In this study a virtuoso violinist was recorded playing several different pitches
with both vibrato and straight tone. The straight tones were then resampled to a variety of
frequencies within 21 cents of the mean vibrato tones. A group of musically experienced
39
Diaz, 6.
40
Horii, “Acoustical Analysis…,” 37.
41
Eric Prame, “Vibrato Extent and Intonation in Professional Western Lyric Singing,” Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America 102, no. 1 (July 1997), 616.
42
Robert Donington, Baroque Music: Style and Performance (London: Faber Music, 1982), 35.
13
listeners were asked to match the vibrato tones to the straight tones with the closest pitch.
The conclusion was that the listeners (with few exceptions) could match the tones
correctly, meaning that the perceived pitch of a note with vibrato is its mean frequency.43
Similar studies utilizing either vocal or artificially produced sounds were conducted by
Sundberg (1978), Iwamiya (1983), and Shonle and Horan (1980) with comparable
results.44
43
Judith C. Brown and Kathryn V. Vaughn, “Pitch Center of Stringed Instrument Vibrato Tones,”
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, no. 3 (September 1996), 1728.
44
Brown and Vaughn, 1729.
14
Vibrato in Music
It is not clear how or when musicians began using vibrato to enhance their music.
While it is widely believed that it first developed in the singing voice, there is evidence
pointing toward its use by instrumentalists as early as ancient Greece.45 What is clear is
that musicians have used vibrato in a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons across
several centuries of music. In a modern classical music recital it would not be out of the
ordinary to hear several different types of vibrato, even from the same vocalist or
instrumentalist. In fact, it is generally expected that one will alter his or her vibrato use to
match the style of music. To improve our analysis, it may be helpful to explore some of
the different ways musicians have used vibrato within the context of musical
performance.
Continuous or Ornamental?
approaches to its use emerge. If you are of the school of thought that vibrato is innate to
the human voice, then it is logical that some vibrato should always be present in a singing
voice. If an instrumentalist is attempting to imitate the lyrical nature of the voice, then he
or she should use vibrato in a similar “continuous” manner. Many believe however, that
vibrato is simply an ornament only used to enhance music. It does not have to be present
for the performance to be considered musically satisfactory. This approach has been most
45
There is evidence vibrato was used on an instrument called the kithara… see Neumann, 14.
15
was considered an ornament, thought of much in the same way as the trill or tremolo are
today. In fact the term “close shake” in relation to string players was synonymous with
Early Music, he categorizes vibrato as an ornament in the “shake” family along with
tremolo, the trill, and the mordent.47 Evidence for this claim can be found in several
historical documents. In Silvestro Ganassi’s 1542 viol treatise, he stated: “At times one
trembles with the bow arm and with the fingers of the hand around the neck in order to
achieve an expression appropriate for sad aggrieved music.”48 This shows Ganassi
thought of vibrato as a means of expression for a specific type of music, not to be used
continuously on the viol. In his 1757 vocal treatise, Johann Friedrich Agricola calls
intentional vocal vibrato bebung, the same term used to describe the ornamental vibrato
capable of being produced by the clavichord.49 For wind instruments, the important
baroque flute treatises of Hotteterre (1707) and Quantz (1752) mention only finger
It is also believed that while vibrato use by both vocalists and instrumentalists
increased in the nineteenth century, much of it was still considered ornamentation. Many
romantic era composers such as Gaetano Donizetti, Fromental Halévy, and Giacomo
46
Joseph Berljawsky, “The Evolution of Vibrato,” The Strad 78 (November 1967), 255.
47
Robert Donington, The Interpretation of Early Music (London: Faber and Faber, 1963), 195.
48
Silvestro Ganassi, quoted in Neumann, 19.
49
Beverly Jerold, “Distinguishing Between Artificial and Natural Vibrato in Premodern Music,”
Journal of Singing 63, no. 2 (Novemeber/December 2006), 162.
50
Dwight Manning, “Woodwind Vibrato from the Eighteenth Century to the Present,”
Performance Practice Review 8, no. 1 (Spring 1995), 67.
16
Meyerbeer wrote specific places for vocalists to use vibrato in their scores, evidence that
its continuous use was not expected.51 Even as late as the early part of the twentieth
century, virtuoso violinist Joseph Joachim made recordings using vibrato only for
There is additional evidence that would suggest not all pre-modern musicians
viewed vibrato as strictly ornamental. Several historical references point to vibrato being
a natural phenomenon, especially in the voice. In 1619 when writing about exceptional
choir boys, Michael Praetorius said they were “endowed by God and Nature with an
especially beautiful vibrant, and flowing or quivering voice.”53 In a 1778 letter by W.A.
Mozart to his father, he stated: “The human voice trembles naturally—but in its own
way—and only to such a degree that the effect is beautiful. Such is the nature of the
voice; and people imitate it not only on wind instruments, but also on string instruments
other early writings. In 1751 Francesco Geminiani wrote, “The art of playing the violin
consists in giving that instrument a tone that shall in a manner rival the most perfect
human voice.”55 Geminiani actually advocated a more extensive use of vibrato than his
51
Jerold, 165.
52
Clive Brown, “Notation and Interpretation,” in A Performer’s Guide to Music of the Romantic
Period, ed. Anthony Burton (London: The Associated Board of the Royall Schools of Music, 2002), 24.
53
Michael Praetorius, quoted in Christopher Jackson, “An Examination of Vibrato Use Options
for Late Renaissance Vocal Music,” Choral Journal 48, no. 1 (July 2007), 28.
54
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, letter of June 12, 1778 to his father, adapted from The Letters of
Mozart and his Family, trans. Emily Anderson (New York: Norton, 1985).
55
Francesco Geminiani, quoted in Merrill T. Hollinshead, “Historical Survey of the String
Instrument Vibrato,” in Studies in the Psychology of Music, vol. 1, The Vibrato, ed. Carl Seashore (Iowa
City: University of Iowa, 1931), 290.
17
contemporaries, suggesting that it should be used even on short notes because it made
them sound more “agreeable.”56 Marin Mersenne also advocated its liberal use in his
1636 violin treatise stating that “The tone of the violin is the most ravishing when players
ornamental vibrato, they often are arguing about two different things. Many believe that
much of the continuous vibrato heard by modern musicians is in fact not the natural
“quivering” that Mozart and others described.58 Some have suggested that the use of
vibrato went through a radical transformation during the late nineteenth century because
concert halls and orchestras became larger. Audiences probably began to desire vocalists
who could stand out from the orchestra and a more exaggerated vibrato allowed them to
do so.59 Over time, extensive training at high dynamic levels led to a habitual continuous
vibrato that became intensified on into the twentieth century.60 As expected, many
vocal counterparts.61
intentional vibrato are quite blurred. As Seashore and others have observed, its use is
quite pervasive in most forms of music, but variations in vibrato use can usually be
56
Neumann, 22.
57
Marin Mersenne, often considered the “father of acoustics,” quoted in Donington, 232.
58
Gable, 91.
59
Jerold, 165.
60
Gable, 93.
61
Neumann, 15.
18
found. This suggests a possible blend of the above vibrato styles. Donington states that
even in forms of early music, continuous vibrato is always musically justifiable if treated
correctly.62 It is the music itself that informs the musician of the “correct” use.
enhance emotion.63 This is one of the innate effects of vibrato as it has been observed
even in emotional speech.64 But in music, since a wide range of emotions are often
portrayed, subtle variations of vibrato can be used to distinguish every detail. This is
every note as it is with a texted vocal piece. The wide range of vibrato use can go from
evoking strong feelings of happiness, sadness, or anger, to simply adding stress to a note
within the musical structure. In fact, more vibrato does not always equal more stress. The
tone with a different kind of vibrato will always stand out from the rest.65
MacLeod’s experiments with vibrato clearly illustrate how emotion and musical
structure can affect vibrato use by trained musicians. She recorded several high school
and university violin and viola students performing scales and musical excerpts. The
vibrato rates and extents of each subject were measured and compared against musical
attributes such as dynamic level and pitch height. She concluded that higher dynamic
levels generally caused the vibrato to be faster (but only on the scales) and wider (on both
62
Donington, 235.
63
Berljawsky, 255.
64
Seashore 623.
65
Jacquelyn Lamar, “The History and Development of Vibrato Among Classical Saxophonists,”
lecture, North Texas University, 1986, 26.
19
scales and excerpts). Notes in the upper range tended to also be faster and wider. Since
louder and higher notes generally have more stress or emotion associated with them, it is
only natural that their vibrato be intensified. Another interesting conclusion in this study
was that the university students used a significantly wider vibrato on the musical excerpts
than on the scales, but the high school musicians did not. Since real musical excerpts
have inherently higher emotional content than exercises, the subjects with more musical
One study by Michel and Myers examined how dynamics affected vibrato use
among vocalists. They concluded that while vocalists generally use the same vibrato rates
on loud and soft singing, the rates increase on crescendos. Here the subjects altered their
vibrato most during the actual transition, not simply between two contrasting dynamics.
The study by Timmers and Desain focused almost exclusively on vibrato and
musical structure. They used a method to quantify certain aspects of the musical structure
to see how it affected the vibrato of a cello, oboe, tenor, theremin, and a violin. Values
for metric stress, phrase position, and melodic charge were assigned to each note of the
given musical material, the first phrase of Saint-Saëns’s “Le Cygne.”68 As the metric
stress increased, the cello, oboe, theremin, and violin all were found to have a decreased
vibrato rate. Extent was generally increased as metric stress increased, but notes with the
highest metric stress often had only medium or even small extents. This was most notable
66
MacLeod, viii.
67
John F. Michel and R. Denise Myers, “The Effects of Crescendo on Vocal Vibrato,” Journal of
Voice 5, no. 4 (1991), 292.
68
originally for solo cello
20
with the cello. For phrase position, only the theremin had its rate affected (slower at the
end of the phrase). The cello and oboe had lower extents at the beginning and end of the
phrase but for violin it was lower just at the end. Melodic charge positively correlated
with the violin’s rate, and both the violin and oboe’s extent.69
The results of the Timmers and Desain study show that musical structures often
affect the parameters of vibrato in unexpected ways. For instance, most of the
instruments actually used a slower vibrato on notes with more metric stress. It is also
interesting to note that the tenor was generally affected the least by contrasting structures
possibly illustrating that vibrato is more innate to the voice. The tenor’s vibrato
parameters remained rather constant as they are a product of his own physiology while
conducted with each subject as part of this study. For the most part, the musicians’ ideas
about how musical structures would affect their own vibrato matched the empirical data
collected. There was some contradiction though in the way the musicians thought they
stressed certain notes with vibrato. In their interviews, most claimed that the notes with
the highest stress would have both faster and wider vibrato. But generally only the extent
was higher with the rate often being lower for these notes.71 Even for professional
musicians there is often a difference between perception and reality in regards to vibrato.
69
Timmers and Desain.
70
Ibid.
71
Ibid.
21
Saxophone Vibrato
uncommon for wind instrumentalists to use vibrato in their playing. Even as vibrato
became more accepted in vocal art music, many still considered it inappropriate and in
poor taste for winds.72 The earliest saxophone studies and method books, including
Klosé (1877), and A. Mayeur (1896) made no mention of vibrato. Carl Weber, in his
1897 method described the ideal saxophone sound as “unwavering.”73 Even in the early
part of the twentieth century vibrato was still not associated with the saxophone. In 1917
Ben Vereecken published his Foundation to Saxophone Playing, one of the most
important pedagogical studies of its time. In the section titled “What to Practice,” he
stated: “Avoid the ‘tremolo’ or ‘vibrato’ style of playing. See that your tone is absolutely
clear and pure.”74 Later he wrote, “Avoid letting the tone tremble by the loosening of the
lips.”75 As late as 1920, George Koehler’s book instructed to “avoid any semblance to
tremolo or vibrato.”76
72
Lamar, 1.
73
Gail Beth Levinsky, “An Analysis and Comparison of Early Saxophone Methods Published
Between 1846-1946,” (DMA doc, Northwestern University, 1997), 153.
74
Ben Vereeken, Foundation to Saxophone Playing: An Elementary Method (New York: Carl
Fischer, 1917), 4.
75
Vereeken, 8.
76
Levinsky, 154.
22
Origins
There are several theories regarding the manner in which saxophonists began
using vibrato. A general assumption has been made that as vibrato became more popular
with vocalists, string players, and finally wind players, saxophonists likely followed this
trend by experimenting with the new technique. A more specific theory relates the
saxophone’s incorporation into dance orchestras of the early twentieth century. At the
turn of the century, dance orchestras generally used no saxophones as the instrument was
still relatively unknown. As the saxophone gained popularity among the general public,
many orchestras began to incorporate its use to remain fashionable. Because of its greater
stylistic flexibility and dynamic range, saxophones most commonly replaced violins in
the orchestras. Since there was a lack of quality players available many violinists learned
time.77 It is probable that these string players brought many of their playing techniques
over to the new instrument. In many cases this would have included vibrato.
While vibrato and other similar effects (harmonic trills, shakes, tremolo, etc.)
were likely being used by Vaudeville and early jazz saxophonists by the first decades of
the twentieth century, the technique had not yet gained popularity among classical
players. Several notable concert soloists of the era, including Jean Moeremans (the Sousa
band soloist), Eugene Coffin (who performed at McKinley’s inauguration), and François
Combelle (Marcel Mule’s predecessor in the Garde Républicane de Paris) played with
no vibrato.78 It may have been Rudy Wiedoeft that first helped to popularize vibrato
77
Wally Horwood, Adolphe Sax 1814-1894: His Life and Legacy (Herts: Egon Publishers Ltd.,
1980), 173-174.
78
Lamar, 13.
23
among the “legit” performers. Though Wiedoeft’s musical style was a mixture of
classical and popular, he attempted to play with some of the same characteristics of his
violinist contemporaries, Fritz Kreisler and Jasha Heifetz.79 Cecil Leeson, widely
considered the first great American concert saxophonist, pointed toward Wiedoeft as his
concert saxophone vibrato more than any other. This of course was Marcel Mule. Mule
began playing saxophone at age seven, but also seriously studied violin in his early
years.81 He later claimed that his studies on the violin taught him a great deal about tonal
saxophone world.82 One may assume that Mule developed his saxophone vibrato style
from the violin, an instrument that was already developing a reputation for extensive
vibrato use during the time of his childhood. But according to Mule himself, this was not
the case. Mule claimed that his vibrato all started with jazz.83
Even though Mule had studied the saxophone since c.1908, he did not hear jazz
played on the instrument until the early 1920s. When he first heard saxophonists play this
new type of music he found the tone remarkably strange, even calling the rapid vibrato
many early jazz players utilized “dreadful.” Anyone familiar with the vibrato style of
French-Creole saxophonist Sidney Bechet, widely regarded as the most influential jazz
79
Lamar, 16.
80
Lamar, 18.
81
Eugene Rousseau, Marcel Mule: His Life and the Saxophone (Shell Lake, WI: Étoile Music,
Inc., 1982), 5.
82
Delangle and Michat, 166.
83
Delangle, 5.
24
In 1923 Mule began performing with jazz groups around Paris for extra income.
He described himself as a decent jazz player, but not a great one because he did not
“favor the choruses.”85 Later on he admitted that jazz taught him about the saxophone’s
power and versatility.86 Eventually Mule was able to succeed in finding the undulating
vibrato characteristic of the local jazz musicians. Though Mule had learned this new
technique, he still played classical music without vibrato, treating the instrument much
like a clarinet. It was in 1928 that everything changed. Mule had been performing with
the Opéra Comique in Paris for a short time when they were scheduled to play a ballet
jazz and liked to include pieces such as foxtrots and blues87 in his compositions. There
happened to be a saxophone solo in the ballet with the composer’s instruction “very
vibrant.” After being unsatisfied with Mule’s interpretation of the solo on the first play-
through during rehearsal, L’Enfant asked Mule to play the solo like he had heard him
play jazz. Mule feared using his jazz vibrato would lead to a “scandal,” but obliged the
composer anyway. Much to his surprise, the performance received exceptionally high
84
Rousseau, 6.
85
He is alluding to improvised soloing, see Delangle, “Interview with the Legendary Marcel
Mule…,” 5.
86
Rousseau, 10.
87
musical styles which were in vogue at the time
25
praise from his peers, some who even suggested he always play concert music in that
manner.88
From that point forward, Mule used vibrato in all of his playing. It is apparent that
he considered the day he initially used vibrato with the Opéra Comique as somewhat of a
turning point in his career. He has even claimed that this event commenced a 15 year
may be some amount of hyperbole in this statement, it is worth noting that during this
time period (1928-1942), a great majority of the most important concert saxophone
repertoire was composed. Mule claimed composers were now attracted to the instrument
because its new sonority (a result of the vibrato) helped set it apart from the clarinet.90
Mule often related the concepts of sonority and vibrato. In an interview with Eugene
Rousseau, he stated, “This basic desire for a good sonority on the part of both performers
and listeners is at the heart of my teaching philosophy. Thus I spent years developing and
refining my sonority and the use of vibrato trying to impart the principles to my
students.”91
It is ironic that Mule credits the origins of his classical vibrato to jazz because the
early jazz vibrato he was first so off put by is one of the things many found “crude” about
88
Delangle, 6.
89
In 1942 Mule became the second ever professor of saxophone at the Paris Conservatory. The
first was Adolphe Sax himself, who held the position from 1857-1870.
90
Rousseau, 77.
91
Ibid, 83.
26
the instrument. After Sigurd Rascher’s debut performance with the New York
In his hands, the saxophone sheds its nightclub abandon and becomes, in fact,
continent and almost reserved. His tone is pure, smooth, and varied. It has not a
trace of Broadway wobble or honeyed slides. When its natural vibrato is
suppressed it takes on the color of the French Horn; and it invades the realms of
the ‘cello and clarinet with no protest from the ear.93
In all likelihood, Rascher was using vibrato on this performance, just not in the same
manner that the writer was accustomed to hearing on the saxophone. It does illustrate the
point however, that the saxophone was still quite new to the concert music scene without
Modern Vibrato
By the middle to late part of the twentieth century, vibrato had become nearly
universally accepted by all concert saxophonists. In 1973 Cecil Gold conducted a survey
often they used vibrato in their performance: always, usually, occasionally, or never. All
Even though vibrato use by saxophonists had become widespread, many observed
regional differences to its approach. There was the “French school,” led by Marcel Mule,
the “American school,” modeled after Cecil Leeson and Larry Teal, and the “Rascher
92
Performance included works by Debussy and Ibert (likely, the Concertino da Camera).
93
Unknown author, “Philharmonic has a Saxophone Soloist for First Time in its 3,543 Concerts,”
New York Times 12 (November 1939), 45, quoted in Timothy Verville, “Instrumantal Vibrato: An
Annotated Bibliography of Historical Writings Before 1940,” DMA Doc., Arizona State University, May
2012.
94
Cecil Gold, Saxophone Performance Practices and Teaching in the United States and Canada
(Moscow, ID: School of Music Publications, University of Idaho, 1973), 29.
27
school,” for the smaller group who followed Sigurd Rascher. These schools had slight
differences in tonal concept, playing styles, and standard repertoire, yet vibrato was
possibly the thing that separated them the most. The Gold survey asked respondents to
comment on the differences between the American and French schools of playing. The
majority of answers focused on vibrato, stating that the French school used faster, wider,
and more constant vibrato. The American school’s vibrato tended to be slower, more
When asked about this subject, Marcel Mule completely rejected the idea of
differing saxophone “schools.” He claimed it was only brought up by players who have
not studied the saxophone seriously and that the correct approach to playing the
instrument should be similar everywhere.96 But according to Stephen Cottrell, when one
person (Mule in this case) has had such an overwhelming influence on his students, a
French school of saxophone playing with Paul Taffanel’s creation of the French flute
school nearly 50 years earlier.98 Larry Teal had a similar influence on his students as the
95
Gold, 32-35.
96
Rousseau, 97.
97
For much of Mule’s tenure at the Paris Conservatory, he was the only classical saxophone
model for his students.
98
Stephen Cottrell, The Saxophone (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012), 248.
99
Teal taught at the University of Michigan 1953-1974.
28
Pedagogy
Universal Method for the Saxophone, published in 1908. It was the most complete
method for saxophone at the time of its publication, and defined vibrato as: “A wavering
tone-effect, which should be sparingly used.”100 Rudy Wiedoeft was the first to write
about vibrato in a more positive way. In 1922 he wrote that vibrato enhanced musical
quality of tone and pointed out how it should emulate the human voice.101 Since that
time, nearly all saxophone pedagogical studies and methods have included discussion on
vibrato. Many focus on ways to achieve and refine vibrato but it is rare to find a
Larry Teal’s 1963 book, The Art of Saxophone Playing. Teal devotes an entire seven
pages to the subject. Included in the discussion are several methods to create vibrato
(through motions of the jaw, lip, throat, or diaphragm) and specific musical examples for
vibrato, with explanations of pitch, intensity, and timbre modulations. There is even a
philosophical discussion about the justification for vibrato on the saxophone. Teal states,
“The saxophone is essentially a lyric instrument, whose tone and use is associated with
100
Paul De Ville, Universal Method for the Saxophone (New York: Carl Fischer, 1908), 9.
101
Levinsky, 154.
102
Levinsky, 166.
29
for the voice, it is logical that the saxophone should be treated likewise.”103
Though Teal does not suggest specific ranges for the parameters of vibrato, he
does discuss both rate and extent. He recommends using an even rate and an extent that is
not so wide it becomes monotonous. He also says these parameters should be determined
by the type of music, and the “emotional quality of the phrase.” Later, he states that “a
variation in rate and extent is desirable.”104 Regarding the overall shape of vibrato, Teal
states, “In a lyrical phrase, pass from one tone to the next without disturbing the flow of
pulsation.”105
One pedagogical publication that does give specific parameters for vibrato is the
Teacher’s Guide to the Saxophone, by Fred Hemke. Hemke was the first American
student of Marcel Mule and became one of the world’s most prominent performers,
teachers, and pedagogs in the area of concert saxophone. In his book he suggests a rate
provided us with some specific ways he helped his students master vibrato. Mule initially
instructed students to learn vibrato with a metronome. His standard speed was 288
undulations per minute (4.8 Hz). His students not only practiced exercises in this manner,
but learned musical studies while keeping a constant vibrato rate. This is precisely why
103
Larry Teal, The Art of Saxophone Playing (Princeton: Summy-Birchard Inc., 1963), 54.
104
Teal, 54.
105
Teal, 60.
106
Fred Hemke, Teacher’s Guide to the Saxophone (Elkhart, IN: H & A Selmer, Inc., 1966), 8-9.
30
movements at 72 beats per minute. This would allow the player to have four undulations
per beat at his suggested vibrato rate. Mule later said he should have suggested a rate of
300 undulations per minute (5 Hz) as he thought that was closer to what he used in actual
performance. Mule believed it was important for his students to be able to play vibrato
with the utmost consistency before he allowed them to vary the speed and depth to suit
the music. He believed practicing with the metronome would teach the control needed to
master vibrato.108
In his section on vibrato, he states that the performer should have complete control over
both the width and speed of vibrato, echoing the sentiments of many of the earlier
studies. He also makes an interesting observation concerning pitch range and vibrato
width on the saxophone. He states that as one descends in range, much more jaw
movement is required to produce the same amount of vibrato as on higher notes. Heavner
never suggests what the ideal parameters of vibrato should be because he also believes
and methods is the amount of pitch variance there should be above versus below the
107
This book of studies originally for oboe has become one of the most standard etude books for
saxophone.
108
Rousseau, 85.
109
Tracy Lee Heavner, Saxophone Secrets: 60 Performance Strategies for the Advanced
Saxo[phoniest (Plymoth, UK: Scarecrow Press, 2013), 71.
31
given note. In the Cambridge Companion to the Saxophone, Kyle Horch states that
vibrato can go above and below the center of the note evenly, or just above, or just below.
He says that the preferred method is to use vibrato which only goes below as to not
constrict the sound.110 Heavner echoes this sentiment, saying that during one undulation
of vibrato, the jaw should be lowered, and then returned to “normal” position. This
causes the pitch to fluctuate from being in tune, to flat, to back in tune. He even warns
against going sharp when the jaw is returned to normal position.111 In Hemke’s method,
he makes similar statements about vibrato only occurring below the note.112
According to Cecil Leeson, the saxophone embouchure holds the pitch near the
upper limit of variation, and that it is physically possible to only use vibrato which goes
under the pitch.113 It is clear that the overwhelming majority of methods suggest using
vibrato that is mostly or entirely beneath the given pitch. Yet, as was previously
discussed, the perception of pitch throughout a tone with vibrato is usually the mean of
the highest and lowest extents of frequency. So in theory, if a saxophonist was precisely
observing the instructions of these pedagogical methods, the listener would always hear
his or her vibrato as being flat. More research is needed on this topic as it relates to
saxophone performance.
110
Kyle Horch, “Saxophone Technique,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Saxophone, ed.
Richard Ingham (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 80.
111
Heavner, 70.
112
Hemke, 8.
113
Cecil Leeson, ”The Basis of Saxophone Tone Production: A Critical and Analytical Study,”
DFA diss., Chicago Musical College, 1955, 76.
32
Methodology
to utilize a clear method for data collection and analysis. The choice of soloists and
recordings was the initial concern when beginning the study. It was impractical to
examine the vibrato use by every significant saxophone soloist as detailed analysis would
be impossible with such a large sample. However, only analyzing one or two prominent
soloists may not illustrate the wide range of vibrato used by saxophonists. In an attempt
to balance these considerations, eight soloists were chosen performing seven pieces of
standard saxophone repertoire. The soloists chosen were Vincent Abato, Arno Bornkamp,
Claude Delangle, Jean-Marie Londeix, Marcel Mule, Otis Murphy, Sigurd Rascher, and
Eugene Rousseau. The repertoire included Aria by Eugene Bozza, Sonata by Paul
Choice of Soloists
Several aspects were considered when choosing the soloists for this study. It was
most crucial to select individuals with a high degree of influence on the field of concert
saxophone. It was also important to select individuals from different time periods and
generational trends in vibrato use. In order to make comparisons of the highest quality
between the soloists, it was also important to select saxophonists that had recorded the
33
same repertoire. A brief justification for the inclusion of each soloist, by order of birth
saxophone school and possibly the most influential of all concert saxophonists. He almost
singlehandedly created the modern pedagogical foundation for saxophone playing and
was also the leading pioneer of the saxophone quartet. Over 60 compositions were
dedicated to him, including the works by Bozza, Desenclos, and Maurice in this study.114
It has been said that when Mule retired from his position at the CNSM (Paris
world had been influenced by him in some way.115 Mule’s inclusion in this study was
essential. His influence on saxophone vibrato has been previously discussed in detail.116
did not gain Mule’s level of influence with his teaching, Rascher may have had a more
successful performance career. He toured much of Europe in the 1930s performing with
several significant professional orchestras, and his 1939 American premier with the New
United States.117 Rascher also had many significant relationships with composers who
would write much of the standard saxophone repertoire. The Glazunov Concerto and
Ibert Concertino, perhaps the two most important pieces of saxophone literature (both
114
Harry R. Gee, Saxophone Soloists and Their Music 1844-1985: An Annotated Bibliography
(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986), 223.
115
Rousseau, 3.
116
see pages 24-26
117
Michael Segell, The Devil’s Horn: The Story of the Saxophone, from Noisy Novelty to King of
Cool (New York: Picador, 2005), 246.
34
included in this study) were written for him. In all, nearly 100 compositions were
actually spent the majority of his life living in upstate New York. His performance style
was significantly different from the French school, and he preferred to play on equipment
more similar to Adolphe Sax’s original designs.119 Because of these differences, Rascher
has always had a following of purists who separate themselves from both the French and
been included in this study because the more influential early American saxophonists
Cecil Leeson and Larry Teal were rarely recorded. Abato was a formally trained
clarinetist who studied at the prestigious institutions of Peabody and Julliard.121 In 1944
he won a job with the New York Philharmonic playing both clarinet and bass clarinet.
That year the orchestra was scheduled to premier Paul Creston’s saxophone concerto with
Marcel Mule performing the solo. Due to complications with the war in Europe, Mule
could not make the trip and Abato was asked to perform instead. Up until this time he had
only played saxophone on the side in after-hours jazz clubs. Abato’s performance was a
resounding success and from then on he was more famous for playing saxophone than
clarinet. Because he always had a full-time clarinet job with various orchestras
throughout his career, he was able to further expose these groups to the saxophone. Since
these orchestras did not have to hire an outside musician (one who may have had a lower
118
Gee, 140.
119
The larger, barrel shaped mouthpiece indicated by Sax’s diagrams is said to give a darker tone
quality and more even distribution of overtones across the entire dynamic range.
120
Segell, 245-246.
121
Gee, 68.
35
performance standard than the orchestra members) they were more inclined to program
works which included the saxophone. This could have influenced composers to write
more for the orchestral saxophone. In this way, Abato likely had a significant influence
Eugene Rousseau (b.1932) is one of the most influential saxophone teachers and
pedagogs in the United States having taught at Indiana University (1964-2000) and the
Iowa, he received a Fullbright Grant to study with Marcel Mule in 1960-1961. Rousseau
also was a co-founder of the World Saxophone Congress, a triennial celebration of the
saxophone held at various locations around the globe. After his debut as a soloist at
Carnegie Hall in 1965, Rousseau has enjoyed an extensive performance career, playing
for audiences across five different continents.123 Though American, his playing style
contains many elements of the French school, possibly because of his time with Mule.
decades, he became known as one of the most vocal champions of new music for the
122
Segell, 254-256.
123
Gee, 148.
124
Ibid, 214.
36
instrument. In addition to the guide, he has authored 29 pedagogical methods and studies.
Paris. He began his tenure in 1982 as the fourth to hold the position after Sax, Mule, and
Daniel Deffayet. Delangle was actually a member of the saxophone studio under
Deffayet, beginning his studies in 1975.126 He is currently one of the most respected
soloists and clinicians in the concert saxophone field. His extensive discography includes
recordings of nearly all the standard repertoire, many of which are considered the
responsible for working with several contemporary composers to create new works for
the saxophone.127
Arno Bornkamp (b.1959) is another one of the most important concert saxophone
included studies with Deffayet, Londeix, and Ryo Noda. In 1982 he made his solo debut
in Rome performing Ibert’s Concertino da Camera to much critical acclaim. Since then
he has presented more than 250 concerts with orchestras around the world. Bornkamp is
Otis Murphy (b.1972) is the youngest individual included in this study. He is one
of the leading concert saxophone soloists in the United States and has presented clinics
125
Jean-Marie Londeix, Comprehensive Guide to Saxophone Repertoire 1844-2012, ed. Bruce
Ronkin (Glenmore, PA: Roncorp, 2012).
126
Gee, 193.
127
Segell, 250.
128
from Arno Bornkamp’s promotional website <http://www.arnobornkamp.nl/uk/biografie.html>
last accessed Aug. 5, 2013.
37
and recitals in much of Europe and Japan. Among others, he has studied with Rousseau
and Jean-Yves Fourmeau, a former member of the CNSM studio under Deffayet. In 2001
(at the age of 28), Murphy became one of the youngest faculty members in the history of
Choice of Repertoire/Recordings
Each recording chosen for this study consists of a work of standard concert
studio’s repertoire list at the university level. It was important to use standard repertoire
for analysis in order to get the best representation of “normal” saxophone vibrato. Where
possible, compositions were chosen that were recorded by several of our selected soloists
orchestra is the oldest work used in this study. Completed near the end of Glazunov’s life
in 1934, it has become possibly the most played concert saxophone work to date. Like
most of his music, this concerto has many aspects of Russian late romantic music, a more
traditional style than most other significant saxophone repertoire. Included in this study
are recordings of the Glazunov by Rascher (1953), Mule (1958), Abato (c.1964),
later in 1935, this work is scored for saxophone and an eleven piece chamber orchestra.
129
from Otis Murphy’s promotional website, <http://otismurphy.com/biography.php> last
accessed Aug. 5, 2013.
38
Ibert knew the saxophone quite well, and had personal relationships with both Mule and
Rascher. The work was written for Rascher and was one of the first pieces to take
advantage of his skills playing in the altissimo register.130 Included in this study are
recordings of the Ibert by Mule (1958), Rascher (1958), Abato (c.1964), Rousseau
Aria for alto saxophone and piano was composed by Eugène Bozza (1905-1991)
in 1936. This brief single movement work is often one of the first pieces of literature
learned by developing saxophonists. The slow tempo and lyrical nature also make it
perfect for vibrato study. Recordings of the Bozza by Rascher (c.1960), Bornkamp
Another one of the most significant compositions for concert saxophone is the
Sonata by Paul Creston (1906-1985). This work was composed in 1939 and dedicated to
the American saxophonist Cecil Leeson.131 Although all three movements were
examined, the second movement, “with tranquility” was focused on the most for detailed
vibrato analysis. Included in this study are recordings of the Creston by Mule (c.1960),
Paul Hindemith’s (1895-1963) Sonate is the only work in this study not originally
composed for the saxophone. The piece was written in 1943 and initially intended for the
alto horn. Hindemith adapted it for the alto saxophone after finding it was a more popular
instrument. For this reason, the writing is significantly less technical than the majority of
version of the fourth movement, which includes material adapted from the highly
130
Rousseau, 59.
131
Gee, 122.
39
technical piano part. For this study only the first three movements were considered.
Included here are recordings by Londeix (date unknown), Rousseau (1968), and
Bornkamp (1989).
The five movement work depicts life in the rural Mediterranean region of France known
as Provence. This was an area where Marcel Mule would often spend his vacations.
Maurice composed the work between 1948 and 1955 and dedicated it to Mule, who also
had a close relationship with her composer husband, Pierre Lantier.132 The first three
movements were considered for this study. Included here are recordings by Mule
The newest work utilized for this study is Prelude, Cadence et Finale by Alfred
Desenclos (1912-1971). This piece was composed in 1956 specifically for the solo de
concours, an annual competition for the saxophone studio at the CNSM in Paris.
Desenclos, a faculty member at the conservatory dedicated the work to his friend and
Observational Techniques
For this study, vibrato was examined using a variety of methods. Some of these
were observational, such as recording the use or non-use of vibrato on a given note or
passage. Some were more mathematical, such as measuring the precise rate and extent of
132
Anthony Jon Moore, <http://www.paulemaurice.com/id5.html> last accessed Aug. 10, 2013.
133
Gee, 223.
40
the vibrato on a certain note. To aid in both observational and mathematical data
Before any detailed data collection took place, a general observational analysis
with respect to the vibrato used on each recording was made. Large scale trends, such as
when and where the soloists used vibrato, and how the soloists’ vibrato styles compared
were considered. These observations will be discussed in detail in both the “Repertoire
Within these sections, the vibrato use or non-use on every note was considered. This data
could then be compared against musical attributes such as note length or metric stress to
determine their influence on vibrato use. These results will be presented in both the
To determine whether or not a given note had vibrato, certain criteria needed to be
least one full cycle was required. However, for notes with a length shorter than one cycle
of vibrato, a full cycle of oscillation was not required. As long as oscillation similar to the
soloist’s vibrato on longer notes was present and detectable, the note was determined to
have vibrato. To aid in these observations, Sonic Visualiser was often used to digitally
134
Sonic Visualiser 2.0, by Chris Cannam, Christian Landone, and Mark Sandler, Sonic
Visualiser: An Open Source Application for Viewing, Analysing, and Annotating Music Audio Files,
Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia 2010 International Conference.
41
Measurement Techniques
In addition to observational analysis, several notes were chosen for the precise
measurement of vibrato rate and extent. For a variety of reasons, it was impossible to
consider every note for measurement. When studying “real” recordings where the soloist
is not isolated, many notes are often obscured by other instruments, or by anomalies in
the audio itself. Only notes that clearly could be isolated with the software were
considered. To accurately compare the vibrato use between each soloist, it was also
important to measure the same notes in every recording of the same repertoire. Where
possible, notes were chosen that contained vibrato by each soloist. Lastly, it was
important to choose notes for measurement with a variety of musical attributes since the
results were to be compared against note length, tempo, dynamics, and range. The notes
were selected from all parts of the spectrum with regards to these attributes. A list of the
notes chosen for measurement, including the raw data collected, can be found in the
Appendix.
In order to record precise measurements of the rate and extent of the vibrato, a
peak frequency spectrogram was applied to the audio. Sonic Visualiser displays this
musical pitch. The horizontal axis of the graph is time in seconds. The spectrogram
representation of the prevailing musical pitches at any given moment. It was possible to
adjust both the frequency and time scale to focus on specific notes.
42
finding a note with vibrato, a measuring tool within the software could be used to
determine the length of each vibrato oscillation. To determine the mean vibrato rate over
a certain amount of time, the total number of full oscillations was divided by the time it
took these oscillations to occur. When measuring the vibrato on a specific note, it was
average. It was also crucial to begin and end the time measurement at precisely the same
place on the vibrato cycle. For this reason, parts of the first or last vibrato oscillations
Measuring the vibrato extent was a more complex process. It must be noted that
within the methodologies presented in this study, it was only possible to measure the
frequency (pitch) extent of the vibrato.135 The measuring tool could determine the
distance in Hz between the frequencies of the highest and lowest extents within a vibrato
cycle. Sonic Visualiser could then convert this value, with respect to the perceived pitch,
to musical cents. This provided the pitch extent for one cycle of vibrato, but determining
the extent for an entire note required a more elaborate method. Many notes did not have a
consistent vibrato extent for their entire duration. On notes with three or less vibrato
cycles, the distance between the highest and lowest peaks was considered.136 For notes
with four or more vibrato cycles, the average of the highest three and lowest three peaks
was considered. If a single vibrato peak was exceedingly higher or lower than the rest on
135
As was discussed previously, pitch extent is the most important parameter of vibrato in
determining the overall effect to the listener.
136
When only hearing a few vibrato cycles, the listener perceives the widest one as the vibrato
extent.
43
General Analysis
In this section, results will be presented from the analysis of vibrato use across all
statistical analysis, trends in vibrato use in comparison to the selected musical attributes
will be examined. These trends will also be compared among each soloist. Data with
regards to use and non-use of vibrato, rate and extent of vibrato, vibrato shape, and
variance above and below pitch was considered for this analysis.
The use or non-use of vibrato was considered on each note in several key sections
of music within the given repertoire. A list of these sections can be found in Table 1.
Sections were chosen based on their importance to the overall composition, and their
44
Table 1 ‐ Sections for the Analysis of Vibrato Use/Non‐use
When comparing the use and non-use of vibrato against various musical
structures, certain trends became clear. For example, it was much more likely for soloists
to use vibrato on notes that fell on a beat than off a beat. Vibrato use was also more
common on strong beats than weak beats. Often the least likely place for vibrato use was
on a pick-up note to a strong beat. It was also observed that vibrato use tended to occur
more in places where the harmony of the music changed. While observations like these
were clear and consistent to a certain degree, it is nearly impossible to quantify them on a
45
large scale. They are better discussed when considering each of these sections separately,
There is however, one overriding factor that was found to influence vibrato use
and non-use that can be quantified on a large scale. This factor is note length. While Carl
Seashore’s studies found that vocalists use vibrato on all notes regardless of length, it is
clear that note length had a positive correlation with the likelihood of vibrato use on the
recordings analyzed here. In fact, there are certain limitations on note length that produce
vibrato use or non-use nearly 100% of the time. In every section listed in Table 1, no note
with a duration of 0.17 seconds or shorter had perceivable vibrato. Conversely, every
note above one second in length, with rare exception, was found to have at least some
vibrato. Figure 1 displays a graph of the percentage of vibrato use on all notes less than a
second in length across all soloists. The thickest line shows the raw data while the other
is a polynomial trend line, which compensates for the extremes and shows a moving
average.
46
Figure 1 ‐ Vibrato Use Percentages on Notes Shorter Than One Second, Across All Soloists
Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
From this graph we can see that the likelihood of vibrato use increases
length. The trend levels out as we near a full second in duration. Figures 2 through 9
show the percentage of vibrato use on notes lasting less than a second for each soloist.
47
Figure 2
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
Figure 3
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
48
Figure 4
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
Figure 5
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
49
Figure 6
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
Figure 7
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
50
Figure 8
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
Figure 9
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Use
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
51
While the overall shape of the graphs for each soloist is similar, there are some
significant differences. The three oldest soloists, Mule, Rascher, and Abato use vibrato on
more notes of a shorter duration than the rest of the soloists. Their trend lines increase at
a much sharper angle, nearing the 100% mark at only a half second in duration.
Bornkamp, Londeix, and Rousseau all have similar trend lines to the overall trend shown
in Figure 1. Otis Murphy’s vibrato use is perhaps the most inconsistent with respect to
note length, but still shows an increase with duration, albeit with a less drastic curve.
Claude Delangle has the most gently sloping trend line of all soloists. His likelihood for
vibrato use does not cross the 50% mark until around three quarters of a second.
The correlation between note length and vibrato use can also be compared against
the tempo of the music. Figure 10 shows the same vibrato use percentile graph for note
lengths less than one second but only for tempos below 100 beats per minute. Figure 11
shows the same but for tempos above 100 beats per minute. There are two things we can
conclude from these graphs. Firstly, the raw data line illustrates that many more of the
shortest notes have vibrato on the slow tempos (Figure 10). The trend line curve however,
is steeper on Figure 11, meaning that for quicker tempos the likelihood of vibrato use
52
Figure 10 ‐ Vibrato Use Percentages for Tempos Less Than 100 bpm
Vibrato Use ‐ Tempo < 100 bpm
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
Figure 11 ‐ Vibrato Use Percentages for Tempos Greater Than 100 bpm
Vibrato Use ‐ Tempo > 100 bpm
100%
Vibrato Use Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Note Duration (in seconds)
53
A total of 873 notes were measured for their rates and extents across all
recordings and all soloists. The mean vibrato rate among all soloists was 5.96 Hz and the
average extent was 37.3 cents. Standard deviation was 0.74 (12.4%) for rate and 16.7
(44.8%) for extent. This indicates that the vibrato rates for each note were about 32%
pedagogical methods and studies. For rate, Hemke recommended between 5 and 5.5 Hz
and Mule instructed 4.8, and later 5 Hz. The mean vibrato rate found in this study is
significantly higher than these suggestions especially in the case of Mule’s teachings. For
extent, Hemke was the only writer to suggest a specific range (from 5 to 15 cents) in total
pitch variance. This suggestion also falls significantly under our recorded mean extent of
37.3 cents.
It is also interesting to compare these results to those found by the many vocal
vibrato studies previously discussed. Prame was the only one to list a specific average
rate. He recorded a mean of 6.1 Hz, which is remarkably similar to the 5.96 found here.
He also concluded that the variation for all notes was 10%, also comparable to our 12.4%
deviation. The standards for rate found by Horri (between 5 and 6 Hz) and suggested in
the pedagogical studies of Titze (between 4.5 and 6.5 Hz), Davids and LaTour (between
5 and 8 Hz), and Diaz (between 5.5 and 7.5 Hz) also fall in line with the mean rate found
in this study. From this, we can conclude that saxophone vibrato has a similar rate to
vocal vibrato.
54
Vibrato extent however, was generally quite a bit higher in both the findings of
vocal scientific studies and in pedagogical suggestions. Most listed the lower limit of
extent at 50 cents, with averages often above 100. Prame’s specific mean was only 71
cents, but that is still nearly double our 37.3 cent mean extent. Unlike rate, the pitch
extent of vibrato used in the singing voice is significantly larger than what is generally
used on the saxophone. It must be noted however, that with a deviation of nearly 45%,
many of the saxophone vibrato extents recorded here fall comfortably in the standard
vocal range.
When comparing the data collected in this study with the above scientific and
pedagogical research, we can conclude that these prominent saxophonists generally used
more vibrato (higher rates and extents) than what is commonly thought to be acceptable
for saxophonists. Their vibrato use in some cases (especially with rate) is actually closer
Figures 12 and 13 show the mean vibrato rates and extents for each soloist in this
study. It is clear that the mean rate between each soloist is far more consistent than
extent, just as the standard deviations for rate and extent among all of the measured notes
illustrate. It may come as no surprise to anyone familiar with concert saxophone history
that Marcel Mule’s extent is significantly higher than the other soloists as he was well
known for his wide vibrato. Equally predictable may be Mule’s modern counterpart,
Claude Delangle having a significantly lower extent than the rest. He has become known
for often breaking from the French tradition and using vibrato in a more measured
manner than his predecessors. While much can be gleaned from these graphs alone, they
55
will become even more useful as we begin to compare vibrato parameters under a variety
Figure 12 ‐ Mean Vibrato Rate for Each Soloist
Mean Vibrato Rate (Hz)
6.37 6.21 6.23 6.32
6.00 5.85
5.50
5.19
Figure 13 ‐ Mean Vibrato Extent for Each Soloist
Mean Vibrato Extent (Cents)
54.08
41.19 41.66
39.42 37.92
32.52 31.71
19.55
56
Table 2 provides the standard deviation, and deviation percentage137 for each
Table 2 ‐ Standard Deviations and Deviation Percentages for Rates and Extents
Rate Extent
Other than Rascher, each soloist’s rate deviation was remarkably similar, all falling
between 9.1% and 12.4%. For extent the deviations are not quite as consistent. It is
interesting that the two soloists who had the lowest mean rate and extent (Rascher and
Delangle, respectively), had the highest deviation percentages for those parameters.
Rascher’s rate varied by 22.4% and Delangle’s extent varied by 59%, illustrating
remarkable inconsistency. It should also be noted that Mule had the most consistent (least
deviation percentage) vibrato rate and extent of all soloists. Perhaps this is a result of
137
The deviation percentage is the standard deviation divided by the overall average (Figures 12
and 13) and is a better unit for comparing consistency.
57
In the next several sections, the data collected for vibrato rate and extent will be
compared against each note’s length, tempo, dynamic, and range. Each section will have
a similar format with the mean across all soloists presented first followed by a
comparison of each soloist. Each section’s graphs will be presented in the format which
Note Length
The length of each note measured was recorded in seconds. Since this data
consists of a set of single notes with several different rates, extents, and lengths, it is best
presented as a scatter chart of single data points. To aid in determining the overall effect
of length on the vibrato parameters, an exponential trend line was included. It should also
be noted that in order to present a clear graph of the data, it was important to designate a
limit on note length. Since nearly every note measured lasted less than four seconds, this
seemed the best possible upper limit for note length. Figure 14 shows the vibrato rate
58
Figure 14
Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
The trend line illustrates that vibrato rate has an overall negative correlation with
note length. The difference between the spread of high vibrato rates and low vibrato rates
across the note length spectrum is also remarkable. There are notes with a relatively slow
rate of vibrato (less than 5 Hz) at all parts of the spectrum, but high rates have a strong
negative correlation with note length. For notes less than one second in length, several
have rates higher than 7 Hz. For note lengths above 1.5 seconds however, rates above 7
Hz are rare with the majority falling below 6.5 Hz. Figures 15 through 22 show the
59
Figure 15
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
Figure 16
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Rate by Note
Length
10
9
8
Rate (Hz)
7
6
5
4
3
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
60
Figure 17
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Rate by Note
Length
10
9
8
Rate (Hz)
7
6
5
4
3
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
Figure 18
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
61
Figure 19
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
Figure 20
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
62
Figure 21
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Rate by Note Length
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
Figure 22
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Rate by Note
Length
10
9
8
Rate (Hz)
7
6
5
4
3
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Length in Seconds
63
Bornkamp, Londeix, Mule, Murphy, and Rousseau have trend lines similar to the
overall trend, with vibrato rate negatively correlating with note length. Rascher’s line also
has a similar shape, but with a more drastic descent. It ends significantly lower on the rate
spectrum. Abato and Delangle each have trend lines that are nearly flat. This means that
their vibrato rates were generally more consistent across several different note lengths
Figure 23 shows the vibrato extent across all soloists in relation to note length.
Figure 23
Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
Even though there was a wide range of extent measurements, there does not seem
to be a significant correlation with note length. The trend is just slightly negative. There
are notes with widely varying vibrato extents at all parts of the note length spectrum.
Figures 24 through 31 show vibrato extent by note length for each soloist.
64
Figure 24
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Extent by Note
Length
100
Extent (cents)
80
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
Figure 25
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
65
Figure 26
Claude DeLangle's Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
Figure 27
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Extent by Note
Length
100
Extent (cents)
80
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
66
Figure 28
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
Figure 29
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
67
Figure 30
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Extent by Note
Length
100
Extent (cents)
80
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
Figure 31
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Extent by Note Length
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Note Length in Seconds
68
The trend lines for Rascher and Rousseau are even flatter than the overall trend
with hardly any correlation between vibrato extent and note length. Bornkamp’s and
Londeix’s are similar with minimal negative correlation. Otis Murphy has the most
severe negative correlation with mean extents of his longest notes roughly half of the
mean extents of his shortest notes. Abato, Delangle, and Mule actually have strong
Tempo
For each note measured for vibrato rate and extent, the prevailing tempo of the
music was noted in beats per minute (bpm). Only notes in sections that had a steady pulse
rate were associated with a specific tempo. Rubato sections, cadenzas, and fermatas were
ignored for this section of the study. The graphs below illustrate any possible correlation
between vibrato rate and extent with the prevailing tempo of the music. As with note
length, this data is presented as a scatter chart with an exponential trend line. Figure 32
shows the relationship between rate and tempo across all of the soloists.
69
Figure 32
Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
While this correlation is slightly positive across all soloists, many high rates still
exist at slow tempos, and many low rates exist at high tempos. The trend is clear but not
strong. Figures 33 through 40 show vibrato rate by tempo for each soloist.
70
Figure 33
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 34
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
71
Figure 35
Claude DeLangle's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 36
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
72
Figure 37
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 38
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
73
Figure 39
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 40
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Rate by Tempo
10
8
Rate (Hz)
2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
74
Every soloist except for Abato has a slight to moderate positive correlation
between vibrato rate and tempo. Abato’s is negative but only to a small degree. Rascher
clearly has the most dramatic positive correlation with his trending rate ranging from
around 4.5 Hz at the slow tempos, to nearly 6 Hz for the fastest ones (roughly a 30%
increase). In addition to the overall trend being positive, Rascher only used high rate
vibrato (over 7 Hz) on tempos above 120. For tempos below 120 bpm, only two notes
were recorded above 6 Hz. Mule’s data is similar in this regard, with every note above 7
It is interesting that a positive correlation between rate and tempo exists in nearly
every soloist’s vibrato. This contradicts the notion found in many pedagogical studies
that vibrato rate should not be tied to tempo in any way. Mule would even make his
students practice vibrato at different metronome settings, always striving to maintain his
suggested 5 Hz rate.138 It could be possible that speeding up ones vibrato is only natural
when performing at higher tempos. The correlation found here however, is not strong
enough to disprove the pedagogical belief that vibrato rate should be unassociated with
tempo.
138
Delangle 6. This requires using a different number of undulations per beat with respect to the
tempo.
75
Figure 41 shows the relationship between vibrato extent and tempo across all
soloists.
Figure 41
Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
As it was with rate, this correlation is also positive, but to a higher degree. Figures
76
Figure 42
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 43
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
77
Figure 44
Claude DeLangle's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 45
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Extent by
Tempo
100
Extent (cents)
80
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
78
Figure 46
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 47
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
79
Figure 48
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
Figure 49
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Extent by Tempo
100
80
Extent (cents)
60
40
20
0
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Tempo (bpm)
80
For extent, Bornkamp, Londeix, Mule, Murphy, and Rascher have a positive
correlation with tempo. Bornkamp has the most positive correlation with a nearly 100%
trend increase from the slowest to fastest tempos. Delangle’s trend line is completely flat,
between extent and tempo. In fact, Abato has a negative correlation for both rate and
extent in relation to tempo. He is the only soloist that generally uses “less” vibrato as the
tempo increases.
Dynamic
Another important goal for this study was to determine what impact dynamics
have on the parameters of saxophone vibrato. Since this study deals with real
recordings—all with various gain levels and made in differing environments—it was
impossible to accurately measure the loudness of each note. Therefore, to determine each
note’s “dynamic,” the dynamic instruction (forte, piano, etc.) on the score was
considered. Since a performer often uses a wide range of literal dynamics within one
written dynamic, this method does not provide the most accurate measure of loudness. It
does however give a good representation of what dynamic the music informed the soloist
to use. This is better for our study since we are trying to determine how the pre-existing
Since not all notes measured had a clearly marked dynamic instruction, several
estimations had to be made. For instance, when a section was marked piano and a
crescendo occurred, the following notes could be estimated at mezzo piano, or mezzo
forte, depending on the musical context. Much of this determination was guided by the
81
recordings themselves, or how each soloist treated the unmarked notes. Several notes
with completely ambiguous dynamic markings, or notes that were played at an entirely
different dynamic level than what was marked on the score were ignored for this section
of analysis.
Each note considered was categorized into one of six dynamic levels (pp, p, mp,
mf, f, ff). Since only six categories exist for one of the variables, a scatter chart showing
all notes measured was impractical. Instead, all of the parameter values for each specific
dynamic level were averaged and are presented as single data points in a line graph.
Figure 50 shows the overall mean vibrato rate for each dynamic level across all soloists.
Figure 50
Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
There is a moderately positive correlation between vibrato rate and dynamic level.
While minimal difference exists between pp and p, or f and ff, the difference between the
most contrasting dynamics is significant. The rate for soft notes averaged around 5.8 Hz
82
with loud ones around 6.2 Hz. These results are similar to the ones found by MacLeod in
her study of string players. She found that vibrato rates were faster with higher dynamic
levels, but only when her subjects performed technical exercises. It seems this positive
correlation exists even with real repertoire for these saxophonists. The results do not
concur with the vocal vibrato study by Michel and Myers where they determined that
different dynamic levels had no effect on vibrato rate. Figures 51 through 58 show the
Figure 51
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
83
Figure 52
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 53
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
84
Figure 54
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Rate by
Dynamic
7.5
7
Rate (Hz)
6.5
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 55
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
85
Figure 56
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 57
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
86
Figure 58
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Rate by Dynamic
7.5
6.5
Rate (Hz)
5.5
4.5
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Abato, Bornkamp, Delangle, Mule, and Rascher have vibrato rates that generally
correlate positively with dynamic levels, similar to the overall trend. Of these, Rascher’s
correlation is the most severe with his louder notes vibrating over 1 Hz faster than the
soft ones. Londeix and Rousseau have slightly negative correlations between rate and
dynamic. Murphy may have the strangest results in this set of data. His overall correlation
is slightly positive, but the dynamics with the highest average rates are mezzo piano, and
mezzo forte. Murphy actually uses a slower rate of vibrato on both the softest and loudest
notes. It should also be noted that four of the eight soloists (Mule, Murphy, Rascher, and
Rousseau) averaged a higher vibrato rate on pianissimo notes than piano notes.
87
Figure 59 shows the mean vibrato extent for each dynamic level across all
soloists.
Figure 59
Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
As it was with rate, the correlation between extent and dynamic level is also
positive, but only for the highest three dynamics. From mezzo piano to fortissimo the
correlation is quite strong with an approximate 15 cent increase (about 47%) in mean
vibrato extent. The findings for vibrato extent and dynamics closely match those from
MacLeod’s string study. Figures 60 through 67 show the mean vibrato extent by dynamic
88
Figure 60
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 61
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
89
Figure 62
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 63
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Extent by
Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
90
Figure 64
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 65
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
91
Figure 66
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Extent by Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
Figure 67
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Extent by
Dynamic
70
60
Extent (cents)
50
40
30
20
10
0
pp p mp mf f ff
Dynamic
92
similar to the overall trend. Rascher’s positive correlation is the most pure with mean
vibrato rates significantly increasing for each higher dynamic level. The graphs for
Bornkamp and Mule also illustrate a dramatic rate increase for the loudest two dynamics.
Abato, Delangle, and Rousseau have minimal correlation between rate and dynamic.
Each of their graphs have a slightly positive trend, but to a much lesser degree than the
Range
To determine the effect that pitch range had on vibrato rate and extent, all
parameters for each separate pitch were averaged. For example, the rates and extents for
every middle C were averaged to establish mean parameters for that note. The results are
displayed in line graphs below including an exponential trend line. The pitches on the
horizontal axis of each graph are displayed in the transposed key for alto saxophone. For
purposes of visual clarity, only every other pitch within the normal saxophone range is
shown, but all notes in the range were considered. Figure 68 shows the mean vibrato rate
93
Figure 68
Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
The overall correlation is slightly to moderately positive with the highest rates
occurring on the highest pitches. Even though the trend is clearly positive, the raw data
shows that mean rates are inconsistent throughout the middle range of the saxophone.
Figures 69 through 76 show the correlation between rate and range for each soloist.
94
Figure 69
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 70
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
95
Figure 71
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 72
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
96
Figure 73
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 74
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
97
Figure 75
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 76
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Rate by Range
8
7.5
7
6.5
Rate (Hz)
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
98
There is quite a bit of variance in the results presented by these graphs. The most
correlation is also positive, but to a lesser degree than the overall trend. Delangle, Mule,
Murphy, and Rousseau have negative correlations between rate and range, but only
Figure 77 shows the mean vibrato extent for each pitch across all soloists.
Figure 77
Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
This correlation is significantly positive with the means for the lowest and highest
pitches over 30 cents apart (around twice as much). The overall trend roughly shows a
66% increase from the lowest to highest range of the saxophone. If Heavner’s assertion139
that low notes take much more jaw motion to produce the same amount of vibrato is true,
it should come as no surprise that they generally have less vibrato extent than high notes.
139
Heavner, 71.
99
It should be noted however, that the means for a few of the lowest pitches shown here are
quite high and that the raw data does not show a consistent increase until around G5 in
the range.
Figures 78 through 85 show the vibrato extent by range for each soloist.
Figure 78
Vincent Abato's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
100
Figure 79
Arno Bornkamp's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 80
Claude Delangle's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
101
Figure 81
Jean‐Marie Londeix's Vibrato Extent by
Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 82
Marcel Mule's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
102
Figure 83
Otis Murphy's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
Figure 84
Sigurd Rascher's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
103
Figure 85
Eugene Rousseau's Vibrato Extent by Range
90
80
70
Extent (cents)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A#3 C4 D4 E4 F#4 G#4 A#4 C5 D5 E5 F#5 G#5 A#5 C6 D6 E6 F#6
Pitch
All soloists show a positive correlation between vibrato extent and range to some
degree. Bornkamp and Londeix have the most dramatic positive correlations with an
increase greater than 100% over each soloist’s range. Delangle has the least positive
correlation with range having almost no effect on his vibrato extent. It is also remarkable
how inconsistent some soloists’ average extents are, even among notes very similar in
range. This is most notable in the low range for Abato where both his highest and lowest
each soloist between the parameters of vibrato, and the four musical attributes discussed.
For each attribute, “+” signs signify positive correlation and “-” signs signify negative.
The more signs there are, the stronger the correlation. A “0” represents negligible
correlation.
104
Table 3 ‐ Correlations between Vibrato Rate and Four Musical Attributes
Overall -- + 0 0
Vincent Abato 0 0 + +
Arno Bornkamp - + + +
Claude Delangle 0 + + 0
Jean-Marie Londeix -- 0 0 0
Marcel Mule - + 0 0
Otis Murphy - 0 0 0
Eugene Rousseau - 0 0 0
Table 4 ‐ Correlations between Vibrato Extent and Four Musical Attributes
Overall 0 + ++ ++
Vincent Abato ++ - 0 +
Claude Delangle ++ 0 0 0
Marcel Mule + + ++ +
Eugene Rousseau 0 - + ++
105
A few things stand out when examining the correlations as a whole. Overall, the
four musical attributes affected vibrato extent far more than vibrato rate. This is
understandable considering the much higher overall standard deviation for extent than
rate. When looking at the individual soloists for rate, Rascher was significantly more
affected by each musical attribute than the others. Murphy and Rousseau were affected
the least. For extent, Bornkamp was affected the most, followed by Murphy. Delangle
was clearly the least affected with tempo, dynamic, and range all having negligible
Vibrato Shape
Many vibrato studies using controlled environments have examined vibrato shape
in a number of ways. These have included measuring the sinusoidal curve of each
undulation, or the vibrato behavior at the transition between two different notes. While
analysis of this kind would tell us a great deal about the vibrato used by saxophonists, it
was impossible to measure this level of detail using pre-existing recordings of varying
audio quality. Using the methodologies already discussed however, it was possible to
analyze one aspect of the saxophonists’ vibrato shapes, the change in rate and extent
To examine the change in rate and extent throughout a note, 77 long tones were
chosen from the 873 originally measured notes. It was important to choose notes with a
significant duration in order to accurately measure the change in parameters. Since other
vibrato studies have commented on the effects of crescendo and decrescendo on vibrato
shape, it was also important to choose notes with these properties. Twenty-two of the
106
notes had a crescendo, 19 had a decrescendo, and 36 had no change in dynamic to act as a
control group. Notes with a significant amount of straight tone were disregarded for this
section of analysis.
To determine the change in vibrato parameters, each note was split into thirds.
Rate and extent were measured within the first and last third of each note. Since overall
rate was measured as an average for the entire note, the rate values were converted to
percentages of the total. For extent it was more useful to determine the change from first
to last third of the note. This value is also presented as a percentage. Table 3 shows the
mean for these values across all notes considered, notes with a crescendo, and notes with
a decrescendo.
Table 5 ‐ Mean Change in Rate and Extent in Long Tones
The table illustrates both expected and unexpected results. In general, vibrato
rates tended to increase throughout a note. This acceleration was fairly even across all
notes, from -3% to 3% of the overall rate. For crescendos, one might expect an increase
in rate at the end of the note, but it was actually more common for the soloist to begin the
vibrato slower (-6%), only ending up 1% above the overall mean. This indicates that the
increase in rate generally happened early in the note. The means for decrescendos
matched up closely to the overall trend. These results are similar to those found by
107
Prame, Bretos, and Sundberg in their vocal studies. They generally found increases of the
vibrato rate in long tones, but to a higher degree (20%) than this study found.
For extent, the results are much more surprising. For all notes measured, the
vibrato extent was 5% less at the end of notes than the beginning. While this may seem
perfectly understandable, the trend for notes with a crescendo is quite astonishing. One
might expect the vibrato to get wider as the dynamic increases, but according to these
findings, just the opposite happens. The last third of notes with a crescendo averaged
21% narrower vibrato than the first third. This is certainly surprising since dynamic and
extent have already been shown to have a significant positive correlation (Figure 59).
One possible explanation is that the embouchure tightens as air pressure increases,
inhibiting vibrato width. Further study is needed in this area. For decrescendos, the same
Not enough data was collected to make accurate conclusions regarding the effects
of crescendos and decrescendos on vibrato shape for each soloist separately, but we can
view the results for all notes considered. Table 4 shows the change in vibrato rate and
108
Table 6 ‐ Mean Change in Rate and Extent for Each Soloist
Bornkamp -5% 2% 7%
Mule 0% 2% -15%
For rate, Rascher averaged the most change from beginnings to endings of long
tones, and generally increased his rate late in the notes. Delangle and Rousseau had
negative values for the first and last thirds, indicating a generally faster rate through the
middle of the notes. For extent, Abato, Bornkamp, and Rascher used wider vibrato at the
ends of notes, while the other five used wider vibrato at the beginnings. The decrease in
extent throughout the note was especially exaggerated by Delangle and Rousseau.
One of the most discussed aspects of saxophone vibrato is the proper amount of
pitch variance above versus below the intended note. As was previously discussed, most
believe that saxophone vibrato should be mostly or entirely below the given pitch. To test
this theory in a controlled environment, one could simply have a subject play long tones
with and without vibrato, or give the subject a static pitch aurally and have him or her
109
match it with vibrato. Since neither of these methods was possible in this study, an
alternative process was developed. On pre-existing recordings, far too many variables
the recording exist to simply measure a note against its “correct” pitch. Furthermore, the
“correct” pitch within the software will always be with respect to equal temperament
tuning, a system the saxophone is not constrained by. The only way to measure the
amount of vibrato extent above and below the intended pitch on pre-existing recordings
was to find notes that contained both straight tone and vibrato.
Thirty-four notes (an average of 4.25 per soloist) across all recordings were found
that contained both straight tone and vibrato. The majority of these had straight tone at
the beginning of the note with vibrato added later, but the opposite was found in a few.
The extent from the straight tone to the highest pitch and lowest pitch within the vibrato
cycle was measured and then compared to the overall vibrato extent of the note. The
mean extent across all soloists was 28.7% above the pitch, and 71.3% below the pitch.
This finding agrees with the pedagogical belief that saxophone vibrato exists mostly
below the intended pitch, but conflicts with those who believe it is only below the pitch.
Of all notes measured, only two (one by Bornkamp, and one by Londeix) had zero extent
Table 7 shows the mean variance above and below pitch for each soloist while
Figure 86 shows these values on a stacked column bar graph to visually illustrate the
difference in variance.
110
Table 7 ‐ Mean Vibrato Extent Above and Below the Intended Pitch
Figure 86
Vibrato Extent Above and Below Intended Pitch
100%
75%
50%
% above
% below
25%
0%
111
Each soloist followed the general trend of playing vibrato with a greater extent
below than above pitch, although Delangle’s variance was close to even. Rascher was the
only soloist to use vibrato that neared 100% below the pitch. It is clear that the notion of
saxophone vibrato being “under” the pitch is quite universal. Of every note measured,
only three (one each by Bornkamp, Delangle, and Rousseau) had a greater variance
112
Repertoire Analysis
In the following sections the use of vibrato within specific excerpts of the selected
repertoire will be discussed. Since the previous section focused exclusively on large scale
trends, this section will focus on aspects such as unique musical structures and their
effects on vibrato, and the direct comparison of single notes or groups of notes by
different soloists. Only pertinent sections from each composition will be discussed. For
each piece, mean rates and extents for all notes measured will be listed for all relevant
soloists. These charts contain the most precise comparisons of data between soloists
presented in this study because the same set of notes was measured for each.
Bozza - Aria
Table 8 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Bozza
Bornkamp 5.9 34
Murphy 6.0 18
Rascher 4.8 45
When examining the vibrato use on Bozza’s Aria as a whole, one of the most
glaring differences between the soloists is the treatment of sixteenth notes. The majority
of time in the piece is spent playing lyrical connected sixteenth notes that are roughly 0.4
to 0.5 seconds in length, a duration range where vibrato use is highly discretionary.
Rascher used vibrato on 92% of the sixteenth notes, Bornkamp on 22%, and Murphy on
113
sixteenths, he used it on 41% of the sixteenth note triplets, the next most common note
length found in the piece. His overall rate and extent even seem fairly constant to the
observer’s ear. He only changed his vibrato noticeably in two places. One is at the cédez
un peu preceding rehearsal 6 (m.58-60), where he drastically slowed the rate as the music
slows. The other is the final note, which he played with a straight tone.
Bornkamp used vibrato quite differently than Rascher. His use mostly involved
the emphasis of certain notes, or parts of notes. Though he used vibrato on only 36 of the
162 sixteenth notes (22%), 30 of these were notes that fell on a beat. The majority of
these (17) occur on the second beat of the measure, a beat that is often emphasized in
triple meters. On long notes his vibrato often changed throughout the note, with many
Murphy’s vibrato use was generally much more reserved than the other two
soloists, but was similar to each in certain ways. On long tones his vibrato use was mostly
for tone coloration similar to Rascher’s, with a more constant rate and extent than
Bornkamp’s. Unlike Rascher however, this tone coloration did not extend to the sixteenth
(or shorter) notes. On sixteenths he used vibrato to emphasize the second beat of certain
measures, though many less times than Bornkamp. It should also be noted that Murphy’s
mean vibrato extent for this piece (18 Hz) was far less than his overall mean (32.5 Hz).
114
Creston - Sonata
Table 9 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Creston
Bornkamp 6.6 46
Mule 6.4 60
Murphy 6.0 38
Rascher 5.7 42
Of the three movements of Creston’s Sonata, the second is best suited for detailed
vibrato analysis because of its slow, lyrical nature. Since the majority of notes in this
movement are eighth notes or triplets (at quarter note = 66 bpm), these notes were
examined in detail. Each eighth note and triplet between measures 8 and 30 (the primary
exposition of the movement) was considered for their vibrato use and non-use. The
results show two contrasting vibrato styles among the four soloists.
Mule and Rascher used vibrato on nearly all of the eighth notes (90% and 85%,
respectively), illustrating their intent of constant tone coloration. For Mule, the most
likely place for non-use was the first note of each phrase, which always acts as a pick-up
or “afterbeat.”140 This also occurred in Rascher’s playing, but his non-use was generally
more random. On triplets Mule had quite a bit more vibrato use (71%) than Rascher
(38%), though their styles were still similar. The most common place for use on triplets
140
An “afterbeat” refers to a string of notes following a downbeat rest, usually at the beginning of
a phrase.
115
The vibrato use of Bornkamp and Murphy was much more dependent on metric
stress. Overall they only used vibrato on 36% and 34% of the eighth notes, but if one
only considers notes that fall on a beat, these numbers climbed to 68% and 66%. In fact,
every single instance of vibrato use on an eighth note for both occurred on a beat. Even
though Bornkamp and Murphy only used vibrato on 11% of the triplets, each use was
also on a beat. This is most remarkable with the triplets since there are generally three in
every set and vibrato was never used on the second or third of these.
Vibrato use by the four soloists continued in their established manner throughout
the rest of the movement until the final three measures. Here the composer’s instruction
states “gradually fading away.” While Mule’s vibrato maintained his established trend of
constant tone coloration, Rascher’s became more similar to Bornkamp’s and Murphy’s.
At this point each of these three began to lessen their vibrato rates and extents in a
gradual manner, eventually using straight tone by the final note. The fact that these
instructions did not cause Mule to lessen his vibrato may point toward his philosophical
Table 10 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Desenclos
Bornkamp 6.4 44
Delangle 5.5 19
Londeix 6.1 45
Murphy 6.0 38
116
One of the primary sections for vibrato analysis in this piece was the opening
statement of the prelude melody, measures 1-15. This section is comprised of mostly
eighth notes, with the dotted quarter notes acting as the pulse at roughly 60 bpm (0.33
seconds per eighth note). As expected with such short durations, vibrato use was fairly
sparse. Across all soloists, there was an average of 10% use for eighth notes. Londeix
used vibrato on 22%, Bornkamp on 10%, Murphy on 6%, and Delangle on less than 1%.
It was also observed that notes containing vibrato were commonly stretched, so their true
When examining the notes where vibrato was present among most or all soloists,
a few trends emerge. Of all eighth notes occurring on the beat, 23% had vibrato, as
opposed to only 5% for notes not on a beat. This means that the soloists were nearly five
times more likely to use vibrato on a beat than off. This trend can also be found in
measure six where all of the notes are actually sixteenths. The only place vibrato existed
in this measure was on notes falling on the beat, with Londeix using it on all four of
them.
Another place where vibrato use was common was on the notes with a tenuto
marking. Bornkamp, Londeix, and Murphy used vibrato on all of these notes within the
first three measures. These were the only notes which contained vibrato in that time span.
add stress to a note. It was also common for vibrato to be present on notes that followed a
large ascending leap. In fact, Londeix used vibrato on several of the leaps in measure
117
The only note in the section where vibrato use occurred for all soloists was the
high F# in measure seven. This is the highest point of the entire opening melody and its
emphasis is to be expected. It also occurs just after the measure of sixteenth notes so its
length was significantly stretched by every soloist to provide even more contrast with the
preceding notes. This is the only eighth note in this section where Delangle uses vibrato.
It is also interesting to examine the vibrato use on the Cadence. The first half of
this section is played by the saxophone alone with no strict adherence to tempo or meter.
The first note is marked with a fermata and is usually played at a very soft dynamic. All
four of the soloists began this note with a straight tone, then added vibrato as they let the
dynamic grow. Delangle was quite a bit more subtle about this than the other soloists
however.
Throughout the first four lines of the Cadence, Bornkamp and Londeix used
vibrato in a similar manner. Most of their eighth notes and all of their longer notes had
vibrato. Delangle and Murphy used quite a bit more straight tone with no vibrato use on
the eighth notes. In the thirty-second note section (the next five and a half lines), the only
notes containing vibrato for any soloist were ones marked tenuto. Here, Bornkamp and
Londeix were again quite similar with vibrato use on nearly all of the tenuto notes,
though Londeix’s use was a bit more exaggerated. Murphy used no vibrato on these when
the dynamic was soft, but added it more and more as he played louder. Delangle’s use
was just the opposite. He used a subtle vibrato on the soft tenuto notes, but went to
118
Glazunov - Concerto
Table 11 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Glazunov
Abato 6.6 36
Bornkamp 6.2 36
Mule 6.2 51
Rascher 4.7 34
Rousseau 5.7 33
One section of the Glazunov that is perfect for vibrato analysis is from measures
104 to 118. This section marked, “Con moto” almost exclusively contains slurred running
triplets, so vibrato use here is not affected by note length. Overall, only 13% of the
triplets contained vibrato across all soloists. When examining these notes against the
musical structure however, two trends emerge. Vibrato use was more likely on notes
When considering only notes that fall on a beat, the vibrato use percentage climbs
from 13% to 39%. In fact, of all triplets containing vibrato in this section, 92% of them
fell on a beat. The correlation is even stronger for notes at the beginning of a change in
the harmony. Here the usage went up to 45%, with all soloists except Delangle using
vibrato on more than half of the notes with a harmonic change. This is another example
Another section in the Glazunov with interesting vibrato use is the “Allegro”
beginning at rehearsal 24. This 12/8 metered section begins with a forte dynamic, has a
119
diminuendo in the second measure, then arrives at piano on the third. Beginning with this
third piano measure however, the music is also marked energico. Five of the six soloists
started the section with no vibrato but began to add it by the measure marked energico.
Only Rascher began the section with vibrato, but it was minimal, and also increased on
the third measure. It is likely that the energico marking actually caused the soloists to
suppress their vibrato in the preceding measures marked forte, a dynamic usually
associated with significant vibrato use. They saved their vibrato for the piano measures as
Hindemith - Sonate
Table 12 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Hindemith
Bornkamp 6.0 31
Londeix 6.0 27
Rousseau 5.9 31
vibrato because it was originally composed for the alto horn, an instrument traditionally
not associated with vibrato use. However, since the piece is mostly lyrical and flowing,141
vibrato use was fairly normal on the recordings analyzed. Of the parameters listed above,
only Londeix’s extent was significantly different (lower) than his overall mean (27 cents,
instead of 41).
141
Since the alto horn is an instrument less technically adept than the saxophone, this work is
technically easier than most of the standard saxophone repertoire.
120
In the first movement, Londeix had the most extensive vibrato use, with its
existence on all notes longer than a quarter. Rousseau had the next most use, but played
many longer notes with a straight tone (seemingly at random). Bornkamp used more
straight tone than the others, especially on all quarters and dotted quarters. Overall, the
least likely place for any of the soloists to use vibrato was the soft sections that begin the
phrases at measures 16 and 33. The thing that stands out about these places is the
stark contrast to the “busy” piano score of the rest of the movement. This is a clear
example of vibrato being used to cut through a dense accompaniment texture, but
In comparison to the first movement, the second had far less vibrato use overall.
This could be because of its march-like nature, or simply the fact that this movement is
more idiomatic to the alto horn. Perhaps the soloists’ were attempting to emulate the
horn’s playing style. Londeix still exhibited the most use, with vibrato on nearly all notes
one beat and longer. He used vibrato occasionally on quarter notes (half of a beat) at the
high points of the phrases, such as in measures five and 62. Rousseau used vibrato
similarly to Londeix, just to a lesser degree. For Bornkamp, straight tone was common on
the final notes of the phrase. Even though these notes are generally long enough in length
to warrant vibrato, they often land on the tonic of the underlying harmony, a note that
121
Table 13 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Ibert
Abato 6.2 41
Bornkamp 6.1 37
Delangle 5.5 24
Mule 6.3 53
Rascher 5.2 44
Rousseau 5.9 31
More recordings of Ibert’s Concertino da Camera were analyzed than any other
piece in this study. Through the first “Allegro con moto” section of the work, vibrato use
was fairly limited as most of the opening melody consists of short notes. Mule had the
most extensive use, with vibrato on nearly all of the notes a half of a beat (eighth note)
and longer. Everyone else used vibrato to varying degrees on the syncopated quarters and
dotted eighths, and all used vibrato on the few notes longer than a beat. Some notable
exceptions were Delangle, who never used vibrato until the long tone at rehearsal 3, and
Bornkamp, who actually used vibrato on some of the eighth notes following ascending
Rehearsal 6 begins the first lyrical section of this work. There is much rhythmic
variety here, and it is interesting to see which kinds of notes were most likely to have
vibrato use. Table 14 shows the different kinds of notes in this section (rehearsal 6 to 8)
and the mean number of soloists (out of six) to use vibrato on them.
122
Table 14 ‐ Vibrato Use for Notes from Rehearsal 6 to 8 in the Ibert
triplets on downbeats 4
This table illustrates the relationships between note length, metric stress, and
vibrato use. In general, length still had the most effect on vibrato use, but metric stress
also played a significant role. For example, with quarter notes vibrato use was more
likely on notes that fell on a downbeat (3.5 soloists) than an upbeat (2.9). For eighth
notes, metric stress was even more important. Eighth notes falling on downbeats (2
soloists) were more than three times as likely to contain vibrato as eighth notes off the
beat (0.6). In every case these off beat eighth notes also act as a pick-up note, a musical
structure that further weakens their metric stress. The same relationship can also be found
for triplets.
From this table we can also glean one piece of information that contradicts the
established positive correlation between vibrato use and metric stress. This comes from
123
looking at quarter notes that fall off of a beat. Though these notes have the least metric
stress of all quarter notes in the section—even less than quarter notes on up beats (2.9
soloists)—they were far more likely to have vibrato (5). The reason for this is that the
notes were syncopated, a rhythmic phenomenon that is often emphasized. Here vibrato
use for the sake of emphasis trumps vibrato use for the sake of metric stress.
One of the most distinctive moments in the Concertino da Camera occurs at the
beginning of the second movement. Here there are two sets of notes, each consisting of
an A descending to a G#, marked quasi recitativo. These notes are almost always played
very slowly and deliberately as if they have no underlying tempo. Vibrato is one of the
key elements to add musicality to this part, and a variety of use options was found on the
One common way to treat the four notes is to play the second set as an echo of the
first. This technique was used to some degree by all of the soloists except for Mule. Mule
actually played the second set a little louder and with a little more vibrato than the first,
but both were otherwise the same. Rascher exaggerated the echo more than the others,
beginning the first note at a surprisingly strong dynamic and with significant vibrato. On
the second set, he played far softer and used almost imperceptible vibrato. Other than
Rascher, Delangle changed his vibrato the most from the first to the second set. While he
did not play much softer on the second set—especially on the first note—his vibrato was
much slower.
Bornkamp, Delangle, and Rousseau each began the notes in this set with straight
tone, adding vibrato later. Bornkamp did this to a greater degree than the other two,
waiting until nearly half way through a note’s duration before adding it. Also, when
124
Rousseau and Delangle added vibrato, the rate was fairly constant through the remainder
of the note. Bornkamp began his vibrato very slowly and increased the rate dramatically
Table 15 ‐ Mean Rates and Extents for the Maurice
Delangle 5.5 14
Londeix 6.5 56
Mule 6.4 50
In the first movement of Tableaux de Provence the only note types where vibrato
was discretionary were quarter notes and dotted quarter notes. All notes shorter than these
had no vibrato use and all notes longer had vibrato use by all three soloists with rare
exception. Londeix used vibrato on 56% of the quarter notes, Mule on 40%, and Delangle
on 5%. This is one of the rare cases where another soloist had more frequent use than
Mule. The difference was their vibrato use on quarter notes at the beginnings of phrases.
Most phrases in this movement begin with a quarter note followed by several eighths, a
rhythmic figure that is repeated several times and forms a distinctive motif. Mule often
played these notes with a straight tone, though vibrato use became more likely as the
dynamic increased. In addition to using vibrato more on those notes, Londeix also tended
to use it on every quarter note in the more lyrical second theme of the melody (first
iteration begins at rehearsal 3). The only quarter notes Delangle ever used vibrato on
125
were ones followed by a rest and preceded by a significant crescendo, such as in measure
27. While he used vibrato on nearly all of the longer notes, it was generally subtle, often
nearly imperceptible.
In the second movement, Mule retained his usual position of most frequent
vibrato user. He used vibrato on 80% of the eighth notes and 100% of the notes longer
than an eighth. The only eighth notes he did not use vibrato on were notes that function as
a pick-up. Londeix used vibrato on only 20% of the eighth notes, also rarely using it on
pick up notes. One strange trend observed for Londeix was his tendency to use vibrato on
just one of the three eighth notes within a single beat (meter is 6/8). The one he used
vibrato on was seemingly random, a trend that continued throughout the movement. The
only longer note with no vibrato use for Londeix was the final note. Delangle had just a
single instance of vibrato use on an eighth note (first note of measure 14) and only used it
on 56% of the quarter notes. He used it on every longer note except the last note in
measure 16 and the final note. Both of these notes were played with significant
decrescendos and Delangle’s choice of straight tone helped to further dissipate the
energy.
Vibrato use for the third movement of the Tableaux de Provence was often
unpredictable and difficult to compare between the soloists. Because there was such
variety in stylistic interpretation, each soloist played certain notes with varying degrees of
separation throughout the movement. Therefore, notes of the same type were often played
with widely varying lengths. Mule had a fairly consistent style with vibrato on all notes
one beat in duration and longer. Most of his eighth notes were too staccato to have
vibrato. Delangle and Londeix both had irregular vibrato use. Many of their notes with
126
enough length to typically warrant vibrato had none. Furthermore, the grounds generally
associated with non-use on longer notes such as decrescendos or extremely soft dynamics
were not responsible here. Delangle even played the seven beat long ‘A’ from measures
22 to 25 with no vibrato whatsoever. In this case, he was using the absence of vibrato as a
certain musical effect itself. This absence caused the note to sound remarkably dry and
127
Conclusions
The final section of this document has been reserved to summarize the most
significant findings from both observational and statistical analysis. We will first re-
examine important conclusions in regards to overall vibrato use, then discuss any unique
tendencies for each soloists’ vibrato. Finally, any correlations between the soloists’
The analysis of vibrato in this study was split into three major categories, the
presence or absence of vibrato, vibrato rate, and vibrato extent. The most important
determining factor for whether or not a note was played with vibrato was its duration,
regardless of tempo. After note length, metric stress played the largest role. In fact, notes
which acted as a “pick-up” to a strong beat were some of the least likely to contain
vibrato. Most of the other factors that increased the likelihood for vibrato use were
related to the stress or emphasis of the given note. These included high points in the
phrase, ascending melodic leaps, changes in harmony, and the need to cut through a
The mean vibrato rate for all saxophonists studied was just under six undulations
per second. This is faster than the rate suggested by the majority of saxophone
pedagogical studies and is actually closer to the vibrato rate commonly used by vocalists.
This is unsurprising considering the saxophone’s association with the human voice. The
only musical attributes found to have a significant effect on vibrato rate were note length
and crescendos. The longer the note, the slower the vibrato tended to be. Crescendos
128
generally caused vibrato to be faster at the end of a note than the beginning, but only to a
small degree more than the normal increase in rate throughout a note.
Vibrato extent was found to be far more inconsistent than vibrato rate. This
inconsistency refers to the range of extents measured across all notes, as well as the range
of mean extents for each different soloist. In comparison to rate, extent was also affected
to a greater degree by certain musical attributes. Dynamic level and range had the largest
effects, each causing the soloists to use wider vibrato as they increased. Throughout the
duration of long tones vibrato extent tended to decrease. This decrease was surprisingly
more exaggerated on crescendos. Finally, the vibrato for each soloist was found to extend
below the intended pitch more than above. On average, the vibrato roughly varied 29%
The vibrato styles of Vincent Abato, Jean-Marie Londeix, and Eugene Rousseau
did not display any strikingly distinctive or unique tendencies. While their rates, extents,
Arno Bornkamp’s vibrato use was most distinctive for his tendency to begin long
tones with straight sound, then add vibrato late in the note. While the others all used this
change his vibrato rate throughout long tones, though no consistent pattern for this
practice was observed. Bornkamp’s extent was also more affected by changes in the four
129
There were several things about Claude Delangle’s vibrato use that were unique.
In general, he used vibrato much less of the time than the other soloists, mostly because
he rarely used it on short duration notes. He even used completely straight tone on several
long notes to achieve a certain musical effect. When Delangle did use vibrato, his use
was generally subdued. In fact his mean extent was far narrower than the rest of the
soloists and was least affected by changes in the various musical attributes. Delangle also
tended to vary his vibrato above and below the intended pitch more evenly than the other
saxophonists.
In several ways Marcel Mule’s vibrato was completely opposite from Delangle’s.
He used vibrato on more notes than any other, and had the widest mean extent by a
significant margin. Mule also had the most consistent rate and extent among all soloists
when considering all notes measured. Because of this consistency and its continuous use,
Mule’s vibrato can be considered the least “ornamental” of any of the soloists studied.
These findings are congruent with his notion that vibrato is directly associated with the
Just as Mule had the most consistent vibrato from note to note, Otis Murphy had
the most consistent vibrato through the duration of each note. He also displayed a
tendency at times to use vibrato as a method of constant tone coloration. Unlike Mule
Sigurd Rascher was another soloist with many unique tendencies for his vibrato.
He had the second highest mean extent, but the lowest rate. All of the others soloists had
fairly consistent rankings in these parameter averages. Rascher was the only one to be
high in one parameter and low in the other. Furthermore, his vibrato rate tended to be
130
more inconsistent and was affected by changes in the musical attributes more than the
other soloists. Rascher was also observed using vibrato for constant tone coloration,
One of the primary goals when beginning this study was to look for trends among
sentiment in the field of concert saxophone study is that playing styles have changed over
the years, and concepts such as the “French” or “American” schools are often discussed
soloists than the eight considered here should be studied. However, our analysis does
When looking for overall trends in the vibrato in relation to the soloists’ ages,
three distinct groups emerged. The oldest soloists, including Mule, Rascher, and Abato,
were observed using vibrato more continuously than the younger soloists. The statistical
analysis of discretionary vibrato use on notes less than a second confirms this
observation. Each of these soloists used vibrato significantly more on notes of a short
duration than the others. Even though Abato’s age is actually closer to the ages of
Londeix and Rousseau, he is best grouped with the older generation because he was a
true pioneer of the concert saxophone. Like Mule and Rascher, Abato did not have a
saxophone instructor, whereas Londeix and Rousseau both studied with established
masters.
131
Londeix and Rousseau (born the same year) can be considered part of the second
between the oldest and youngest generations. When considering all facets of their styles
however, they probably had more similarities with the younger soloists.
(even though Murphy is significantly younger than the other two). They are all currently
among the most sought after soloists and clinicians, and each direct prominent saxophone
studios. Their vibrato on average tends to be used more for ornamental purposes in
comparison to the older soloists, although Bornkamp often has more widespread use.
Table 16 shows the mean rate and extent for each group of soloists categorized by
generation. From this data, we can conclude that over the years vibrato rate has remained
Table 16 ‐ Mean Rate and Extent for all Soloists, Grouped by Generation
saxophone “school,” was more difficult. If one considers Mule and Londeix (Mule’s
student) to represent the French school of playing, then it is easy to draw the conclusion
that French players generally had higher parameters for vibrato. Mule was second in rate
and first in extent, and Londeix was third in both categories. However, if one also
132
includes Delangle, the current director of the saxophone studio at the Paris Conservatory,
this conclusion cannot be made. Delangle ranked seventh in rate and eighth in extent and
also used vibrato less of the time than any other soloist.
It was also difficult to make any conclusions about the American school of
playing. Much of this was the result of the soloists chosen for the study.142 Both
Rousseau and Murphy studied with prominent French saxophonists (Mule and Fourmeau,
respectively) so their playing styles were likely influenced by the French school a great
deal. Even so, Abato—the only American saxophonist in this study not significantly
influenced by the French style—actually had a vibrato style closer to Mule’s than
Rousseau’s and Murphy’s were. This is evidence of the generational trend outweighing
It should also be noted that Rascher has often been considered the leader of a third
school, the “Rascher” school. This study’s findings do indicate many unique attributes to
his vibrato, which were discussed in the previous section. However, more data needs to
be compiled on the vibrato of other followers of the Rascher school to determine if there
Significance of Findings
This study has attempted to provide a better understanding of the ways in which
prominent concert saxophonists have used vibrato in their music. Through statistical
analysis certain trends for saxophone vibrato have been established. These trends include
not just the values for mean rate and extent, but the effects of the music itself on vibrato
142
Cecil Leeson, Larry Teal, or Donald Sinta would have been better choices to define the
American school, but analyzing recordings of common repertoire was deemed more crucial to the study.
133
use. Since the soloists studied are some of the most significant concert saxophonists of
the past and present, the trends found can also be considered exemplary characteristics of
saxophone vibrato. If nothing else, this study will hopefully influence others to examine
their own vibrato in a more comprehensive manner so that its use can serve the music in
134
Bibliography
Berljawsky, Joseph. “The Evolution of Vibrato.” The Strad 78 (November 1967): 255-
267.
Brown, Judith C. and Kathryn V. Vaughn. “Pitch Center of Stringed Instrument Vibrato
Tones.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, no. 3 (September
1996): 1728-1735.
Cottrell, Stephen. The Saxophone. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Davids, Julia and Stephen LaTour. Vocal Technique. Lon Grove, IL: Waveland Press,
Inc., 2012.
De Ville, Paul. Universal Method for the Saxophone. New York: Carl Fischer, 1908.
Delangle, Claude. “Interview with the Legendary Marcel Mule on the History of
Saxophone Vibrato.” Australian Clarinet and Saxophone (March 1998): 5-11.
Translated by Huguette Brassine. Published online at <http://clarinet-
saxophone.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/interview-with-Marcel-Mule.pdf> Last
accessed July 23, 2013.
Desain, Peter, Henkjan Honing, Rinus Aarts, and Renee Timmers. “Rhythmic Aspects of
Vibrato.” In Rhythm Perception and Production, edited by Peter Desain and Luke
Windsor, 203-216. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000.
Donington, Robert. Baroque Music: Style and Performance. London: Faber Music, 1982.
Donington, Robert. The Interpretation of Early Music. London: Faber and Faber, 1963.
135
Gold, Cecil. Saxophone Performance Practices and Teaching in the United States and
Canada. Moscow, ID: School of Music Publications, University of Idaho, 1973.
Heavner, Tracy Lee. Saxophone Secrets: 60 Performance Strategies for the Advanced
Saxophonist. Plymoth, UK: Scarecrow Press, 2013.
Hemke, Fred. Teacher’s Guide to the Saxophone. Elkhart, IN: H&A Selmer, Inc., 1966.
Horwood, Wally. Adolphe Sax 1814-1894: His Life and Legacy. Herts: Egon Publishers
Ltd., 1980.
Large, John and Shigenobu Iwata. "The Significance of Air Flow Modulations in Vocal
Vibrato." The NATS Bulletin 32, no.3 (February/March 1976): 42-47.
Leeson, Cecil. “The Basis of Saxophone Tone Production: A Critical and Analytical
Study.” DFA Dissertation, Chicago Musical College, 1955.
Levinsky, Gail Beth. “An Analysis and Comparison of Early Saxophone Methods
Published Between 1846-1946.” DMA Document, Northwestern University,
1997.
136
Manning, Dwight. “Woodwind Vibrato from the Eighteenth Century to the Present.”
Performance Practice Review 8, no. 1 (Spring 1995): 67-72.
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus. Letter of June 12, 1778 to his father. Translated by Emily
Anderson. The Letters of Mozart and his Family. New York: Norton, 1985.
Prame, Eric. “Measurements of the Vibrato Rate of Ten Singers.” KTH Computer
Science and Communication. Department for Speech, Music and Hearing
Quarterly Progress and Status Report 33, no. 4 (1992): 73-86.
Prame, Eric. “Vibrato Extent and Intonation in Professional Western Lyric Singing.”
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, no. 1 (July 1997): 616-621.
Rousseau, Eugene. Marcel Mule: His Life and the Saxophone. Shell Lake, WI: Étoile
Music, Inc., 1982.
Seashore, Carl E. "The Natural History of the Vibrato." Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 17, no. 12 (December 1931): 623-626.
Segell, Michael. The Devil’s Horn: The Story of the Saxophone, from Noisy Novelty to
King of Cool. New York: Picador, 2005.
Teal, Larry. The Art of Saxophone Playing. Princeton: Summy-Birchard Inc., 1963.
Timmers, Renee and Peter Desain. “Vibrato: Questions and Answers from Musicians and
Science.” Proceedings of the Sixth ICMPC. Keele: 2000. Available online at
<http://www.nici.kun.nl/mmm/papers/mmm-35/mmm-35.html> Last accessed
August 1, 2013.
Titze, Ingo R. "Getting the Most from the Vocal Instrument in a Choral Setting." Choral
Journal 49, no. 5 (November 2008): 34-41.
137
Software
Sonic Visualiser 2.0. By Chris Cannam, Christian Landone, and Mark Sandler. Sonic
Visualiser: An Open Source Application for Viewing, Analysing, and Annotating
Music Audio Files. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia 2010 International
Conference. Available at <http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/>.
Repertoire
Creston, Paul. Sonata for Alto Saxophone and Piano (1939). Delaware Water Gap, PA:
Templeton Publishing, 1945.
Glazunov, Alexander. Concerto in E flat. Boca Raton, FL: Edwin F. Kalmus & Co., Inc.,
1934.
Maurice, Paule. Tableaux de Provence (1955). Paris: Editions Henry Lemoine, 1990.
Recordings
Bornkamp, Arno. Devil’s Rag. Nieuwegei, The Netherlands: Vanguard Classics, 1995.
Ivo Janssen, piano. Recorded February-March, 1995 in Eindhoven.
138
Bornkamp, Arno. Saxophone Sonatas. Castricum, The Netherlands: Globe, 1990. Ivo
Janssen, piano. Recorded October 1989 in Amsterdam.
Mule, Marcel. Live Recital. Unpublished. Marion E. Hall, piano. Recorded February 9,
1958, Elkhart, IN.
Murphy, Otis. Fantasy. Tuscon, AZ: Arizona University Recordings, 2006. Haruko
Murphy, piano.
Murphy, Otis. Memories of Dinant. Bloomington, IN: RiAX, 1999. Haruko Suzuki,
piano.
Rascher, Sigurd. Sigurd Rascher Plays the Saxophone. Harrison, NJ: Grand Award AAS
703. Russell Sherman, piano. Recorded c.1960.
Rascher, Sigurd. The Classical Concertos Live! Laurel, MD: Bryan Kendall, 2007.
Recorded in 1953 and 1958, Boston and Stockholm.
Rousseau, Eugene. The Virtuoso Saxophone, Volume 2. Columbus, OH: Coronet Records
LPS 1601, 1968. Marion Hall, piano. Recorded c.1968.
139
For each soloist, the raw values for the rate and extent of each note measured are
presented below. The notes are grouped by composition. The name of the recording
examined is also listed. “Note” is the measure the note begins in, followed by its named
pitch (in the transposed key of the alto saxophone). “Time” refers to the time stamp of the
nearest second the note can be found on for its respective recording. “Rate” refers to the
vibrato rate in Hz and “Extent” refers to the vibrato extent in cents. It should also be
noted that the overall pitch of some of the recordings was significantly out of tune,
or transferring process, the playback speed was incorrect. Since this affects vibrato rate,
the rates measured each had to be adjusted on the incorrect recordings (see footnotes).
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
146
This recording was found to be 45 cents
sharp, so the rates were each lowered by 2.6%.
149
150
151
152