Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I
Principal Finance Officer (Corporate and
National Accounting). He can be reached
ndia has become a hotbed of telecom mergers at sanjoybanka@rediffmail.com.
and acquisitions in the last decade. Foreign
investors and telecom majors look at India as
one of the fastest growing telecom markets in the
world. Sweeping reforms introduced by
successive Governments over the last decade
have dramatically changed the face of the
telecommunication industry. The mobile sector has
achieved a teledensity of 14% by July 2006 which
has been aided by a bouquet of factors like
aggressive foreign investment, regulatory
support, lower tariffs and falling network cost
and handset prices.
M&A have also been driven by the
development of new telecommunication
technologies. The deregulation of the industry
tempts telecom firms (telcos) to provide bundled
products and services, especially with the
ongoing convergence of the telecom and cable
industries. The acquisition of additional products
and services has thus become a profitable move
for telecom providers.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
M&A in telecom Industry are subject to
various statutory guidelines and Industry specific
provisions e.g. Companies Act, 1956; Income
Tax Act, 1961; Competition Act, 2002; MRTP
Act; Indian Telegraph Act; FEMA Act; FEMA
regulations; SEBI Takeover regulation; etc. We
will cover some of these regulations hereunder
— Sanjoy Banka
guidelines on merger of licences in February
2004. The im-portant provisions are state below:
which are unique to the telecom industry.
Prior approval of the Department
TRAI Recommendations of Telecommunications will be
necessary for merger of the licence.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)
is of the view that while on one hand mergers The findings of the Department
encourage efficiencies of scope and scale and of Telecommunications would normally be
hence are desirable, care has to be taken that given in a period of about four weeks from
monopolies do not emerge as a consequence. the date of submission of application.
TRAI had issued its recommendation to DoT in l Merger of licences shall be restricted
January 2004 regarding intra circle Mergers & to the same service area.
Acquisitions which were accepted by DoT and
stated below. l There should be minimum 3
operators in a service area for that
DoT Guidelines service, consequent upon such
Department of Telecommunications (DoT) merger.
can be credited with issuing a series of liberalis- l Any merger, acquisition or
ing initiatives in telecom sector which has led to restructuring, leading to a monopoly
phenomenal growth of the Industry. Based on market situation in
recommendations of TRAI, DoT issued
SEBI amendmen
Takeover t are as fol-
Guidelines lows:
SEBI l No
takeover acqui
guidelines rer
called who
Securities toget
and her
Exchange with
Board of pers
India ons
(Substantial
actin
acquisition of
g in
shares and
conc
takeover)
ert
Regulations,
with
1997 are
applicable to him,
listed Public who
companies holds
and hence 55%
would be or
applicable in more
case of M&A but
less unlist
than ed,
75% but
of has
the obtai
shar ned
es or listin
votin g of
g 10%
right of
s of issue
the size,
targe then
t the
com limit
pany of
shall 75%
acqui will
re by be
hims incre
elf or ased
throu to
gh 90%.
pers Regu
ons lation
actin 11(2)
g in l If an
conc acqui
ert rer
unles who
s he toget
mak her
es a with
publi perso
c ns
anno actin
unce
g in
ment
conc
as
ert
per
with
the
him,
regul
who
ation
holds
s.
55%
Furth
or
er, if
more
a
but
targe
less
t
than
com
75%
pany
of the
was
share
s or publi
votin c
g anno
rights unce
of the ment
targe as
t per
comp
any
is
desir
ous
of
cons
olidat
ing
his
holdi
ng
while
ensur
ing
that
Publi
c
Holdi
ng in
the
targe
t
comp
any
does
not
fall
belo
w the
permi
tted
level
of
listin
g
agre
emen
t he
may
do so
only
by
maki
ng a
g
capit
the
al of
regulatio
the
ns.
comp
Further,
any;
if a
or b)
target such
company other
was lesse
unlisted, r
but has perce
obtained ntage
listing of of
10% of votin
issue g
size, capit
then the al as
limit of woul
75% will d
be enabl
increase e the
d to acqui
90%. - rer to
Regulati incre
on ase
11(2A) his
holdi
l The
ng to
mini
the
mum
maxi
size
mum
of
possi
publi
ble
c
level,
offer
while
to be
ensur
made
ing
unde
the
r
requi
Regu
reme
lation
nt of
11(2
mini
A)
mum
shall
publi
be
c
lesse
share
r of
holdi
a)
ng as
20%
per
of the
listin
votin
g
agre cognisance of
emen a merger
t. perceived as
potentially
Competitio anti
n Laws competitive
Competitio and it can
n also enquire
Commission until one year
of India (CCI), after the
established in merger has
2003, holds taken place.
statutory Once CCI has
responsibility been notified,
for ensuring it must decide
free and fair within 90
days of
competition in
publication of
all sectors of
details of the
the economy.
merger or
The
else it is
Competition
deemed
Act, 2002 has
approved.
provided for a
The CCI can
liberal regime
allow or
for mergers,
disallow a
whereby
merger or can
combinations
allow it with
exceeding the
certain
threshold
modification.
limits fall
Most of the
within the
operative
jurisdiction of
provisions of
CCI. The
Competition
threshold
Act have still
limits are
not been
quite high.
notified.
Most
competition THE
laws in the CONTOUR
world require S OF M&A
mandatory IN
prior TELECOM
notification of
M&A are
every merger
also referred
to the
competition
as Corporate
authority but
Marriages
under Indian
and
law it is
Alliances.
voluntary. Mergers can
However CCI be across
can also take same or
suo motu similar
product lines.
In many taxation
cases parlance
mergers are where a
initiated to profit making
acquire a company
competing or merges with
complement a loss
ary product. incurring
A reverse company to
merger is take
another advantage of
scenario in tax
B ankin g a n d f i n a n c e
scale with
phenomenal
shelter. benefit to the
A acquirers in
horizontal terms of
merger higher
(mergers profitability,
across same and better
product valuations.
profile) adds
to size but Takeo
the chances vers
for attainment genera
of profit lly
efficiency are have
not very high. three
On the other typical
hand a patter
vertical ns:
merger
a) In the
(entities with
different first
product mode
profiles) may l, the
help in invest
optimal or
achievement acqui
of profit res a
efficiency. contr
Say a mobile olling
operator stake
acquires a in the
national long acqui
distance red
company and comp
thus saves any
IUC charges. and
In telecom retain
Industry, s it as
most of the a
acquisitions separ
were ate
horizontal entity
which helped
. This
the acquirers
is the
to expand the
simpl
area of their
est
operation and
mode
customer
l with
base quickly.
the
These
provided intent
economies of to
avoid has
the retain
legal ed
hurdl most
e for of the
mergi acqui
ng red
the comp
comp anies
any (Ush
into a
the Marti
paren n-
t Kolka
comp ta,
any. Fasc
This el-
route Gujar
also at,
gives Aircel
the Digili
acqui nk –
rer a Hary
flexibi ana,
lity to Rajas
sell than
off and
the UP
opera East,
tion Sterli
on a ng
stand Cellul
alone ar-
basis Delhi,
later Escot
on, in el -
case Punja
the b) as
merg separ
er is ate
not legal
succe entiti
ssful. es.
This b) In
mode the
has seco
been nd
follow mod
ed by el,
Hutch the
ison, acqui
which rer
merg e for
es sever
the al
acqui entiti
red es
comp and
any integ
with rate
the all
pare oper
nt ation
after s
acqui seam
ring lessl
contr y into
olling a
stake singl
. This e
mod legal
el entity
requi . This
res mod
comp el
letion has
of been
merg follo
er wed
form by
alitie Bhart
s i,
with whic
due h has
appr merg
oval ed
of most
High of
court the
s and acqui
also red
from entiti
DoT. es
It has with
the the
adva pare
ntag nt in
e of due
avoid cours
ing e of
statut time.
ory c) The
comp third
lianc mod
el
entai
of the
ls
purc target
hase company
of on stand
asse alone
ts basis
without
purchasi
ng the
company
as a
whole. In
some
cases,
where
the
licences
were
cancelle
d by DoT
due to
default,
such
compani
es sold
the
telecom
assets
and
custome
r
databas
e to the
acquirer,
who
could
easily
integrate
the
same
into his
existing
licence
and
strength
ened his
network
and
custome
r base at
a
nominal Australia.
cost. We now
The need to
seller understand
company some of the
which predominant
was objective of
stripped takeovers in
of telecom
licence sector,
as well which can
be
as
summarised
telecom
as follows:
network
was Acquisiti
ultimatel on of
y wound licences
off. or
geograp
THE hical ter
ALLURE ritory;
OF M&A
IN l Acqu
TELECOM isitio
n of
India’s spec
telecom trum;
liberalisation
was noticed l Acqu
by Global isitio
investors in n of
1995 when telec
the om
Government infra
permitted struc
entry of ture
foreign and
telecom netw
operators ork;
through
Joint l Acqu
venture isitio
route. Some n of
of these cust
global omer
giants base
included to
Vodaphone, achi
AT&T, eve
Hutchison
an
Whampoa,
econ
Telekom
Malaysia, omic
and Telestra base
; foreign
investors
l Acq
where
uisiti
teledensity
on of
ranges from
bran
40% to
d
100%. On the
valu
other hand,
e;
the
l High teledensity in
er Indian market
oper is currently
ating hovering at
profit 14% like a
(EBI low hanging
TDA) fruit. The
marg rural
in; teledensity is
l A almost
com negligible at
binat about 3%.
ion India’s young
of and middle
abov class market
e. offers
tremendous
Market
scope for
access:
market
There has
expansion
been almost
and new
saturation of
business. For
demand in
example,
the home
even after 15
market of
years
majority of
S a
t s
a
n b
d u
a s
r i
d n
e
1 s
4 s
c c
l o
a m
s b
s i
i n
f a
i t
e i
s o
n
a )
m
a i
l n
g t
a o
m
a t
- w
t o
i
o c
n a
s t
e
( g
a o
l r
s i
e t
s h
e
f
o n
r a
t
t u
h r
e e
p o
u f
r
p m
o e
s r
e g
e
o r
f
a
a n
c d
c
o b
u )
n
t a
- m
i a
n l
g g
a
a m
) a
t
a i
m o
a n
l
g i
a n
m
a t
t h
i e
o
n n
a
i t
n u
r
e is not
applicable.
o In order
f to apply
pooling of
p interest
u method (in
r case of
c merger
h scenario)
a five
s conditions
e have to be
. fulfilled i.e.
a) transfer
A of all assets
S and
liabilities to
1 transferee
4 company b)
provides that 90% of
in case of shareholder
amalgamatio s of
n in the transferor
nature of company
merger, should
pooling of become
interest shareholder
method is to of transferee
be applied, company
whereas for c) Cons
other cases idera
purchase tion
method is to for
be applied. purc
This hase
standard is shoul
appli-cable d be
only if two or paid
more entities by
are merged issue
to form a of
new entity. equit
In case of y
takeover of shar
majority e of
interest trans
which does feree
not yield to comp
formation of any
a new d) Conti
merged nuati
entity, AS 14 on of
busin
ess
IFRS 3
of
prohibits
the
pooling of
acqui
interest
red
method and
comp
permits only
any
purchase
and
method of
e) No
accounting by
adjus
the acquirer
tmen
in M&A. With
t to
be issuance of
mad IFRS 3, IAS
e for 22 stands
asset withdrawn.
s and The
liabili significant
ty changes
taken introduced by
over. IFRS 3 are as
Sinc follows:
e in
most
of
the
telec
om
acqui
sition
s,
condi
tions
No.
(B)
and
(C) are
generally
not
applicable,
the
purchase
method is
applied for
takeovers.
In June,
2001, the US
Financial
Accounting
Standards
Board
(FASB)
adopted two
new
accounting
standards: rtisat
FAS 141 ion
‘Business of
Combinations good
’ and FAS will
142 ‘Goodwill and
and Other
l in
Intangibles’
most
which was
case
applicable for
business
s,
combinations annu
from 1 July al
2001. These testi
introduced ng
major for
changes in good
US will
accounting as impa
follows: irme
l a nttes
tingr
ban
ather
on
than
pooli
amor
ng
tisati
(i.e.
on,
merg
for
er
acqu
acco
ired
untin
intan
g);
gible
all
asse
busi
ts
ness
with
com
indef
binat
inite
ions
lives.
are
to be Takeove
treat rs in Indian
ed telecom
industry
as
have seen
purc
following
hase
common
s accounting
(i.e. and
acqu financial
isitio issues:
ns);
l In
l no telec
amo om
acqu cost/
isitio book
ns, valu
good e
will less
is accu
state mula
d at ted