Chapter IV

CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

4.1 Training programme attended by employees
4.1 The table showing the training programmes attended by the employees
Table No. 4.1
Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Upto 2 14 56
3 to 5 8 32
6 to 8 2 8
8 to 10 1 4
Total 25 100
Sources: Primary data
Fig.4.1
Percentage of respondents
60
50
40
30 Percentage of
respondents
20
10
0
Upto 2 3 to 5 6 to 8 8 to 10
Interpretation:
From the above figure it can be found out that 56 percentage of the employees had attended
upto 2 training programmes .Whereas 32 percentage of the employees had attended 3 to 5
training programme. While 8 percentage of the employees had attended 6 to 8 training
programmes. Remaining 4 percentage of the employees had attended 8 to 10 training
programmes.
4.2 Training method undergone by employees
4.2 The table showing the training method undergone by the employees
Table No.4.2

Job rotation 15 60
Coaching 7 28
Job instructional technique 2 8
Apprenticeship 1 4
Total 25 100
Sources: Primary data
Fig 4.2
70
60
60
50
40
28
30
20
8
10 4
0
Job rotation Coaching Job instructional Apprenticeship
technique
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 60 percentage of the employees had undergone job rotation.
Whereas 28 percentage of the employee had undergone coaching. While 8 percentage of the
employees had undergone job instructional technique. Remaining 4 percentage of the
employees had undergone apprenticeship method of training.
4.3 Person to whom training is provided
4.3 The table showing the opinion employees about to whom the training is provided in
Milco
Table No.4.3

Yes 20 80
No 5 20
Total 25 100
Source: Primary data
Fig 4.3
90
80
70
60
50
yes
40
no
30
20
10
0
No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 80 percentage of the respondents agree that the training is given
to new employees and 20 percentage of employees have disagreement.
4.4 Training in improving skills
4.4 The table showing the opinion of the employees about training improves skill.
Table No.4.4

Strongly agree 11 44
Agree 7 28
Neutral 4 16
Disagree 2 8
Strongly disagree 1 4
Total 25 100
Fig 4.4
45
40
35
30
25
Percentage of
20
respondents
15
10
5
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 44 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training
improves the skill. Whereas 28 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While16
percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to
this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.5 Number of training programmes organised for workers
4.5. The table showing the opinion of employees about the number of training programmes
organised for workers are sufficient.
Table No. 4.5

Strongly agree 2 8
Agree 3 12
Neutral 5 20
Disagree 8 32
Total 25 100
Fig 4.5
35
30
25
20
15 Percentage of
respondents
10
5
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training
programmes organised for employees are sufficient. Whereas 12 percentage of the
respondents agree to this. While 20 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32
percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 28 percentage of the respondents
have a strong disagreement.
4.6 Effectiveness of training programme
4.6. The table showing the opinion of employees about the participation of workers in training
programme would help increase its effectiveness
Table No. 4.6

Agree 6 24
Neutral 4 16
Disagree 2 8
Total 25 100
Fig 4.6
50
40
30
Percentage of
20 respondents
10
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that
participation of employees in training programme increase its effectiveness. Whereas 24
percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became
neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the
respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.7 Absenteeism
4.7 Do you agree that training and development helps to reduce absenteeism.
Table No. 4.7
Choice No. of respondents Percentage of respondents

Yes 17 68
No 8 32
Total 25 100
Fig. 4.7
80
70
60
50
40 Yes
No
30
20
10
0
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 68 percentage of the respondents agree that absenteeism is
reduced through training and development and 32 percentage of the respondents have a
disagreement.
4.8 Productivity and performance
4.8. The table shows the opinion of employees about enhancing productivity and performance
through training
Table No.4.8

Agree 6 24
Neutral 4 16
Disagree 2 8
Total 25 100
Fig.4.8
50
40
30
Percentage of
20 respondents
10
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that productivity
and performance are enhanced through training. Whereas 24 percentage of the respondents
agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the
respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong
disagreement.
4.9 Period of training programme
4.9. The table shows the opinion of employees about the time period of training programme
Table No. 4.9

Strongly agree 5 20
Agree 4 16
Neutral 6 24
Disagree 8 32
Total 25 100
Fig.4.9
35
30
25
20
15 Percentage of
respondents
10
5
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 20 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that time period
of the training programme was sufficient. Here 16 percentage of the respondents agree to this.
While 24 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32 percentage of the respondents
disagree to this. Remaining 8 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.10 Place of training
4.10. The table shows the rating given to the place of training
Table No.10

Excellent 4 16
Good 11 44
Average 3 12
Poor 5 20
Very poor 2 8
Total 25 100
Fig.4.10
50 44
40
30
20
20 16
12
8
10
0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 16 percentage of the respondents rate the place of training as
excellent. Whereas 44 percentage of the respondents rate as good. While 12 percentage of the
respondents rates average, 20 percentage of the respondents rates poor. Remaining 8
percentage of the respondents rate it as very poor.
4.11 Opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training programs were
clearly defined
4.11. The table showing opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training
programs were clearly defined
Table No.4.11

Clearly defined 3 12
Not defined 10 40
Defined to certain extend 12 48
Total 25 100
Fig 4.11
60
50
40
30 Percentage of
respondents
20
10
0
To great extent To some extent Not at all
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 12 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives
are clearly defined. While 40 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are
not defined. Remaining 48 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are
defined to certain extend.
4.12 Response of instructor to employees doubts
4.12. The table shows the opinion of employees about the response of instructor to employees
doubts
Table No.4.12

Often 2 8
Sometimes 3 12
Seldom 6 24
Never 14 56
Total 25 100
Fig.4.12
60
50
40
30 Percentage of
respondents
20
10
0
Often Sometimes Seldom Never
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the employees opined that often instructor’s
response to their doubts. While 12 percentages of them opined that sometimes instructor’s
response to their doubts and 24 percentage opined that seldom instructors response to their
doubts. Remaining 56 percentage opined instructors never give response to their doubts.
4.13 Feedback
4.13. The table shows the opinion of employees about the feedback taken after training
Table No4.13

Strongly agree 2 8
Agree 5 20
Neutral 2 8
Disagree 13 52
Total 25 100
Fig.4.13
60
50
40
30 Percentage of
respondents
20
10
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback are
taken after training session. Whereas 20 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 8
percentage of the respondents became neutral, 52 percentage of the respondents disagree to
this. Remaining 12 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.14 Feed back in evaluating training effectiveness
4.14. The table shows the opinion of employees about feedback can evaluate training
effectiveness
Table No.4.14

Strongly agree 7 28
Agree 10 40
Neutral 4 16
Disagree 3 12
Total 25 100
Fig.4.14
45
40
35
30
25
20 Percentage of
15 respondents
10
5
0
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 28 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback
can evaluate the effectiveness of training. Whereas 40 percentage of the respondents agree to
this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 12 percentage of the
respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong
disagreement.
4.15 Efficiency of trained employees
4.15. The table shows the opinion of the employees about the efficiency of trained employees
Table No 4.15

Yes 21 84
No 4 16
Total 25 100
Fig.4.15
80
70
60
50
40 Yes
No
30
20
10
0
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 84 percentage of the respondents agree that trained employees
are more efficient than non trained employees and 16 percentage of the respondents have a
disagreement.
4.16 Barriers to training
4.16. The table shows the barriers to training based on the opinion of employees
Table No.16

Time 7 28
Money 4 16
Lack of interest of employees 3 12
Non availability of skilled
trainers 5 20
Others 6 24
Total 25 100
Fig.4.16
30
25
20
15
10
Percentage of
5
respondents
0
Time Money Lack of Non Others
interest of availability
employees of skilled
trainers
Interpretation:
From the above figure it can be seen that 28 percentage of the respondents say that time is a
barrier for training. Whereas 16 percentage say that money is the barrier. While 12
percentage of the respondent says that lack of interest from the part of employees is the
barrier, 20 percentage of the respondents say that non availability of skilled trainers is a
barrier. Remaining 24 percentage of the employees state some other reasons.
4.17 Motivation level
4.17. The table shows the opinion of employee about training helps in increasing
motivational level.
Table No 4.17

Yes 18 72
No 7 28
Total 25 100
Fig.4.17
80
70
60
50
40 Yes
No
30
20
10
0
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 72 percentage of the respondents agree that training helps in
increase motivational level and 28 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.18 Appraisal given to employees
4.18 The table shows the opinion of employee about the appraisal given as a motivation for
attending training
Table No.4.18

To great extent 2 8
To some extent 9 36
Not at all 14 56
Total 25 100
Fig.4.18
60
50
40
30 Percentage of
respondents
20
10
0
To great extent To some extent Not at all
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to great
extent. While 36 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to some extent and
remaining 56 percentage of respondent not at all received appraisal.
4.19 Need of additional training programme
4.19. The table shows the opinion of employees about the need of additional training
programme
Table No.4.19

Yes 16 64
No 9 36
Total 25 100
Fig.4.19
70
60
50
40
Yes
30 No
20
10
0
Interpretation:
The above figure shows that 64 percentage of the employees need an additional training and
36 percentage of the employees don’t need it.
4.20 Complaints about training session
4.20. The table shows about the complaints with regards to training session.
Table No 4.20

Take away precious time of
employees 12 48
Too many gaps between the
session 5 20
Training sessions are
unplanned 6 24
Boring and useless 2 8
Total 25 100
Fig.4.20
60
50
40
30
20 Percentage of
respondents
10
0
Take away Too many Training Boring and
precious time gaps between sessions are unuseful
of employees the session unplanned
Interpretation:
From the above figure it is understand that 48 percentage of the respondents’ complaints
about the time consumption.20 percentage of the respondents’ complaints about the time gap
between each session. While 24 percentage of the respondents complaints that training
sessions are unplanned and the remaining 8 percentage complaints that training sessions are
boring and useless.

Chapter IV

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Chapter IV

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table No. 4.1

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Table No. 4.5

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Table No. 4.6

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Table No. 4.7

Choice No. of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Table No. 4.9

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Choice No of respondents Percentage of respondents

Você também pode gostar