Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Venture capital is an alternative asset that provides financing to new, young and
growing businesses. These start ups find it difficult to raise traditional financing
through mainstream markets so they need to raise through a different channel
VCs provide capital and guidance in return for equity. Because of the high risk of new
ventures they require a significant proporian of equity.
In the initial stages entrepenuers will usually raise money on their own using their
own savings, credit cards, loans, second mortgages etc. This is known as boot
strapping. This allows the EN to keep all ownership at the initial stage and leave the
control in their own hands. It eliminates moral hazard and information asymmetry as
the entrepenur owns 100% of the business
The second stage could be through angel investors and seed capitalists. These are
professional investors using their own funds. Ususlly high net worth indivisudials, IB,
Lawyers etc. they aim to get high returns by joining early and prepare the business for
VC fundraising. Angels get involved in the firm rather than purely investing using
their network of human and financial resources and intelectualt capital.
In the expansion stage venture capital fundraising takes place. They raise capital and
maintain relationships with investors. They monitor the investment and finally exit
the investment and aim to make substantial returns
VCs raise funds from limited partners and then invest those funds in different
businesses. They then return the capital invested and returns to their limited partners
while taking a management fee and fee on the profits of the investment.
VCs are strict in choosing a business due to the high risk. The relationship/investment
usually lasts 10 years before the VC will exit the investment either through the sale of
the firm, IPO or liquidation.
General partners VCs – day to day management of the fund, usually invest a small
amount of their own capital
In past history top funds have usually remained top funds and bottom funds struggle
to gain the returns of their more successful competitors. This means the LPs will base
their investment mainly on the reputation of the fund and their previous performance.
This makes it even more challenging for first time funds as they have an unproven
team. They would recruit a lead advisor and establish aliances with existing
institutions.
VC with larger stakes in funds that have recently gone public raise funds with greater
probalitliy and rais larger funds
What is the legal structure under which VCs raise their funds?
Limited liability – LPs cannot be involved in the day to day running of the business
GPs are responsible for the running of the business and have unlimited liability
Too restrictive – can only invest in Australian companies, cannot invest in companies
more than 250m – difulut for buyout firms, cannot invest in financial, property,
construction
Demand: economic growth, capital gain tax, R&D tax incentives, markets – banks
current policies
How do venture capitalists get compensated? What are some of the complexities
in workingout a VCs carried interest?
Management fee – fee charge to LPs between 1.5-2.5% of committed capital for the
running of the fund
Carried interest – GPs take a share in the profits of a private equity fund. Sometimes
funds must be returned to LPs first and then GPs will receive a percentage of the net
profits
Limited partnership agreement will specify the time and form of distribution to the
LPs and can be very complex
What is the role of coventants in VCLPs? What factors deternine the number of
covenants in an LPA?
Covenants aim to prevent opportunistic behaviour – MH and AC, IA. Once LPs
commit funds GPs may behave in a way that benefits them but is against the interest
of the LPs – 3 Types:
Activities of the general partners – co investment – cannot invest their own funds. –
use LPs funds to discover winner and then invest themselves. Restriction on sale of
partnership interests, fundraising, addition of more GPs
Compensation – VCs that are residual claimants have less of a need for restrictive
covenants
Types of investment – tech funds eg – high information assymetary and agency costs
– need for more covenants
Sophistication of investors – high sophistication=low need for covenants – choose
more wisely
How does corporate venture capital differ from independent venture capital?
Issues arise because of a lack of well defined missions – do not want to invent a
product that makes core product obsolete
It is important that the VC firm has the same vison as the parent company to better
select new firms. They make investments at a premium. Unsuccessful without similar
focus to parent.
Corporate VCs are oftern inexperienced, enjoy more indiect benefits associated with
involvemtne relative to independent VCs
Firm specific risk – wide array of potential outcomes for a company or project, even
with a good team, product, market the probability of success can still be low
Risk vs information
Agency problems - Agency problems – marking down value of firm may leave
entrepenuer with little ownership and little incentive. Entrepenuer reaction to risk can
deviate from VC desired level of risk – too much personal wealth could make EN risk
averse – choose low NPV projects. Over optomisstic EN or too little ownership –
exposes VC to risk – ownership is a call option – need for appropriate structuring
Due diligence – need to start verifying what you believe to be true – ensuring
information disclosed by entrepreneur is correct, identifying all relvant risks and
reducing information assymetries before making invesntment.
starts from screening process – both qualitative and quantitave information – feel of
business as well as financial and legal details
verifying information with experts, check regulatory backgounds, questions toward
entrepenuers – attitude toward risk
verifying information with previous round investors – dilution=conflicts, price paid,
need to repurchase earlier rounds
• - Conservative Valuation
divestication = only a few companies need to deliver returns to make up for losses
VC price investee company cheaply – overall returns will compensate for the high
level of risk – sensitivity analysis – valuation of investee should be BELLOW the
average case scenario.
Staging – financing in discreat stages over time – shorter duration = more frequent
monitoring. Aims to mitigate moral hazard/information assymitary – keep EN on
track
gathers information, monitors progress and maintains option to abandon financing
key variables are the duration and size of stages – tied to specific milesstones
agency costs vs monitoring costs tradeoff – monitoring is very costly
new investors ownership is based on post money valuation – staging means that
entrepenuer keeps more ownership
What are the major ways that VCs can add value to an entrepreneurial firm?
HR – attract large pool of talent – large network – very good at attracting human
capital – VC backing accelerated hiring of senior execs
Matchmaking – network, contacts and reputation gives access to new: VCs,
Customers, suppliers, alliances, aquasiton targets, aquirers, Invesmtent banks
What type of financing instruments do VCs use? How do their pay-offs change
under various exit scenarios?
Common Stock
What is a term sheet? How do the following provisions in a term sheet operate.
Owners stock does not become his until he has been at the company for a certain
length of time – typically 1/16th per quarter. Sometimes accelerating occurs
VCs can force the firm to pay back face value of investment at any time – 2 reasons –
VC partnerships have limited life – mechanism to force liquidation. Prevent lifestyle
companies from operating by demanding redemption or forcing liquidation.
• - Supermajority Provisions
• - Pay-to-Play provisions
investors aim to ensure that other investors continue to support the company when it
is not perfomring well but there is still a chance of a payout. In pay to play investors
have to invest a certain amount in later financing or they could lose their some rights.
Could be forced to convert into common stock, could stirp them of anti dilution
provisions, or could take away vaious control rights. This is good for EN as it means
they will continue to be supported
board is split amoung founders and company execs, investors and sometimes
independent members – small board is efficient. Effective for VCs to appoint an
expert as their member – large boards in start ups are useless.
Boards can fire CEOs or force a company to take drastic actions that the founder may
not apporove of – VCs and companies are not perfectly aligned.
Some companies grant founders super voting shares with allow them to control
almost everythint but it is rare for investors to agree to this in large or public
companies
Dictates whose approval invokes the drag along – majority of preferred or also
common holders, who gets dragged – only common or also preferred – raises legal
expenses
whatever percentage a founded or other key holder sells of his stake, the
investor gets to do the same to the same buyer. Gets invoked when founder or
key holder wants to sell stock to a third party. Company has right to buy the
stock on the same terms as the third party – enables company to control
stockholder base. Companies usually assign this right to investors either before
the company has a chance to excersixe or after they pass up on the opportunity.