paramount, and that is maintaining the health and safety of our coal mine workers. With the ever present reminder from the media that no job is safe, our coal mine workers thoughts are (understandably) not 100% on the job and now more than ever is the time for all to be truly vigilant and to look after your workmates. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 coal mine worker means an individual who carries out work at a coal mine and includes the following individuals who carry out work at a coal mine— (a) an employee of the coal mine operator; (b) a contractor or employee of a contractor. Since the inception of risk based legislation (1999-2001) risk management has been the instrument widely used and often abused by the coal owners’ representatives in an effort to expediently get the job done with minimal regards to the risk management requirements of our legislation, and more importantly the safety of our coal mine workers. More and more, mining management teams are referring to other State and Federal OHS laws with legal counsel as a stand points on safety protocols regardless of the legislation that governs our coal industry. This being the Queensland Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 & the Queensland Coal Mining Safety and Regulation 2001. This has led to complex and conflicting management systems being developed and not adequately maintained. To clarify any misunderstanding, the term “management” encompasses those who control and or give directions to coal mine workers, for example; Supervisors, Open-Cut Examiners, ERZ Controllers, Shift Supervisors, Ventilation Officers, Mine Managers and Site Senior Executives. All of whom make up part of the mine management structure and have the relevant competencies that permit them to legally give direction and supervision. We must never forget that the coal mining safety and health legislation that we, in the coal mining industry all must adhere to is written on the blood of our fallen comrades that have either been made incapacitated or have lost their lives due to being exposed to unsafe conditions that left them vulnerable to the risks without adequate controls in place to either remove or minimise the exposure to the hazard. Risk Assessments have become the catch cry of the day, with acronyms such as JSA’s, JSEA’s, SLAM’s, HIT’s, Take 5’s, WRAC’s etc... These are all useful tools in risk assessment, but only the initial exercise in the process of ensuring an acceptable level of risk is achieved. How is the coal mine worker expected to perform or understand his or her task safely, if given to read and sign a risk assessment pro- forma that does not outline the steps required to perform the task safely, when the end game after the risk assessment is to develop an easy to understand work procedure with identified existing and additional controls in place? The majority of coal mine workers’ openly state that risk assessments are only performed to permit a risky task to proceed with the onus of risk mitigation placed squarely at the feet of the coal mine worker. A case in point was a mining company that required the removal of product from an open- cut operation. This operation was to be performed adjacent to a known strata faulting (being the failing high-wall). A JSA was performed, hazards identified and soft controls put in place. Unfortunately, the controls were inadequate to the extreme. These being “keep close watch on the high-wall whilst operating under it and move away if rocks start to fall”. The mines management had previously identified this area as unstable, the mine’s geologists had advised to cease operations in this pit and had gone so far as to equate the amount of material that would fall. Despite these dire concerns, coal mine workers were directed by their supervisors to work this area as “a JSA had been done”. The inevitable fall of earth occurred and approximately 30,000 tonne dislodged and fell onto a rear-dump truck trapping the coal mine worker (who could be your Husband, Father, Son, Brother, Uncle, Cousin or Mate) and leaving him with a permanent metal rod in his back to replace his broken spine - not the way he would have intended to come home from work! In the foyer of any coal mine and their corporate offices, there is the obligatory safety and health policy. Inevitably, these policies all profess the same motherhood statements with one invariably stating; compliance with relevant legislation is paramount to the operation. How can this be when we have numerous accidents and incidents occurring daily at our coal mines? Are the policies just wall coverings? You would like to think not. If these corporate safety and health policies are to legally state the intentions and beliefs of mining companies then, the coal mining safety and health legislation also requires to be read and understood if compliance is to occur. One main requirement is the objects of the Act being; Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 The objects of this Act are— (a) To protect the safety and health of persons at coal mines and persons who may be affected by coal mining operations; and (b) To require that the risk of injury or illness to any person resulting from coal mining operations be at an acceptable level. This is done through the identification of hazards and the controlling of risks involved in every mining operation. A colleague of mine once said; “the hazard is the shark in the swimming pool – the risk is swimming with it” The coal industry is very apt at identifying hazards and consequences, but not very good at ensuring the identified controls to obtain an acceptable level of risk are in place prior to the start of the task. Numerous risk assessments are performed and (in some cases) work procedures developed from the outcomes of the risk assessments. Once written they identify the additional controls that are required to be in place prior to the start of any mining operation to achieve an acceptable level of risk, these could include communication, additional training, guarding, isolation, barriers or gas levels etc... Once written and made part of the safety and health management system they become a statute of law. In other words, did you do what you said (in black and white) you were going to do? Unfortunately, this is just not the case in numerous operations and accidents and incidents continue to occur. This leads to (in some cases) the issuance of safety alerts, so as the rest of the mining industry is aware and is given the opportunity to be pro-active in ensuring a similar incident at their operation does not occur. This is not the case in reality though; reoccurrence of similar incidents continues to occur at an alarming rate. This is on top of the current mining boom that required additional management personal to be placed in areas of operation with little to no training given, just a desired outcome. With this and combined with the loss of corporate memory at well established mining operations, has led to mismanagement of coal mine workers safety. Change Management or Management of Change? In some cases the slightest change to performing a routine task can have catastrophic results if not identified and managed correctly. The legislation requires that all mines manage any change in their mining operation with assessment of what the change may have on the task in relation to its health and safety obligations to all coal mine workers. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 62 Safety and health management system (3) The safety and health management system must be adequate and effective to achieve an acceptable level of risk by— (g) if there is a significant change to the coal mining operations of the coal mine—containing a plan to immediately review the safety and health management system so that risk to persons is at an acceptable level. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 64 Review of principal hazard management plans and standard operating procedures (1) This section applies if— (a) a safety and health management system has been developed for a new coal mine; or (b) it is proposed to change a safety and health management system at an existing coal mine. (2) The site senior executive must review the principal hazard management plans and standard operating procedures in consultation with coal mine workers affected by the plans and operating procedures. (3) The review under subsection (2) must take place— (a) for a new coal mine—as soon as practicable after the start of coal mining operations; or
(b) for a change at an existing coal mine—before the change
happens. A case in point that recently occurred with regards to the failure of change being managed and legislative requirements being met, was at an underground coal mine in central Queensland. The mine had identified that their gas analyser was in need of an upgrade, so a job order was placed to have an external agency come to the mine to perform the upgrade. This upgrade would mean that the tube bundle gas analyser would be out of commission for at least 48hrs. The mine did not identify that this was a significant change to the mining operation and had not developed a contingency plan to deal with the outage. This is despite the legislative minimum requirements that all sealed areas must be monitored. Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001 223 Monitoring and sampling mine atmosphere (1A) The safety and health management system must also provide for sampling of the mine atmosphere, using the mine’s gas monitoring system, at each of the following places— (a) The return airway from each unsealed waste, idle workings and goaf area; The end result (after a directive was issued by the Industry Safety and Health Representative to ensure an acceptable level of risk was achieved) was that men were withdrawn from the mine till a sampling regime was put in place to comply with not only legislation but also the mines principal hazard management plan for spontaneous combustion. It is the mismanagement of these serious safety events as briefly described in both aforementioned cases of legislative breaches that have the ever present potential to continually cause injuries and or multiple fatalities. It does not require Nirvana for the minimum requirements to ensure that the safety and health of our coal mine workers is to be met. Simply put, there is a prescribed and well proven way of achieving these minimums and the industry, as a whole, is just not consistently making the grade. Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001 Part 2 Safety and health management system 6 Basic elements A coal mine’s safety and health management system must provide for the following basic elements— (a) risk identification and assessment; (b) hazard analysis; (c) hazard management and control; (d) reporting and recording relevant safety and health information and data. There are often two main areas that are contributively linked to the failures investigated, both of them being controllable and yet many times ignored. These being the lack of communication and the involvement by those that are required to perform and or affected by the task. Step by step the coal mining safety and health legislation and associated standards spell out the requirements that (as a minimum) are to be achieved in developing a procedure to safely perform a task. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 14 Meaning of standard operating procedure A standard operating procedure at a coal mine is a documented way of working, or an arrangement of facilities, at the coal mine to achieve an acceptable level of risk, developed after consultation with coal mine workers. Firstly, identify the hazards in the task required to be accomplished and the impact the task may have on other areas of the operation. This is the risk assessment stage, to be performed with no preconceived outcomes and by an independent thinking facilitator. The end of this stage does not imply the task can be begin Secondly, the involvement of those who will be required to perform the task along with technical support from their respective coal mine management and or external assistance. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 13 Meaning of consultation Consultation with coal mine workers is discussion between the site senior executive or supervisors and affected coal mine workers about a matter with the aim of reaching agreement about the matter. Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001
Standard operating procedures
10 Developing standard operating procedures (1) The site senior executive must ensure the following steps are taken in developing standard operating procedures for managing and controlling hazards at the mine— (a) the site senior executive must consult with a cross-section of the mine’s coal mine workers involved in carrying out a task under the proposed standard operating procedure to identify the hazards associated with the task and ways of controlling the hazards; Once the hazards involved in the task have been identified, then the assessment process takes into account the existing controls in place at the mine to classify the risk through the ranking process.
Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999
18 Meaning of risk (1) Risk means the risk of injury or illness to a person arising out of a hazard. (2) Risk is measured in terms of consequences and likelihood. The end of this stage does not imply the task can be begin Now that the assessment process has identified the level of risk in performing the task, perseverance must be given to achieving the “ALARA” principle, being As Low As Reasonably Achievable. Emphasis being on achievable (and acceptable) to the coal mine workers that are required to perform the desired task safety. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 29 What is an acceptable level of risk (1) For risk to a person from coal mining operations to be at an acceptable level, the operations must be carried out so that the level of risk from the operations is— (a) within acceptable limits; and (b) as low as reasonably achievable. (2) To decide whether risk is within acceptable limits and as low as reasonably achievable regard must be had to— (a) the likelihood of injury or illness to a person arising out of the risk; and (b) the severity of the injury or illness. Some tasks require additional controls to be put in place to ensure an acceptable level of risk, these additional controls are then added to the assessment and the task re- ranked to make certain that ALARA has been achieved. The end of this stage does not imply the task can be begin From the identified controls and the required additional controls, a procedure can then be drafted.
Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001
Standard operating procedures 10 Developing standard operating procedures (1) The site senior executive must ensure the following steps are taken in developing standard operating procedures for managing and controlling hazards at the mine— (b) the site senior executive must prepare a draft standard operating procedure and give a copy of it to the coal mine workers with whom the site senior executive consulted; During this period, the additional controls must be assigned to a responsible person to make certain they are implemented prior to the commencement of the task. Not, as in many cases just ink on a page. These additional controls could be as simple as limiting access or extra roof support. Once the draft procedure is written then the following legislative requirements apply. Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001 Standard operating procedures 10 Developing standard operating procedures (c) if the coal mine workers agree with the draft standard operating procedure, the site senior executive must prepare it as the final standard operating procedure; (d) if the coal mine workers do not agree with the draft standard operating procedure— (i) for a disagreement that is not about a legal or technical matter—the site senior executive must decide the disagreed matter and prepare the final standard operating procedure; or (ii) for a disagreement that is about a legal or technical matter—the site senior executive must— (A) obtain further information or advice, including, for example, from a person having the necessary qualifications and experience to give the advice or from a recognised text on the matter; and (B) after consulting with the workers about the information or advice, prepare a further draft standard operating procedure and give a copy of it to the workers; and (C) if the workers disagree with the further draft—decide the disagreed matter and prepare the final standard operating procedure; (e) the site senior executive must include the final standard operating procedure in the mine’s safety and health management system. (2) The site senior executive must ensure— (a) the final standard operating procedure accords with— (i) all matters agreed, under this section, between the site senior executive and coal mine workers; and (ii) the site senior executive’s decision, under this section, on any disagreed matters; and (b) a record is kept of the disagreed matters. (3) In developing the standard operating procedure, the site senior executive must— (a) use a risk assessment process recognised by the mining industry as an acceptable process for identifying and controlling hazards; and (b) have regard to the methods of controlling the hazard stated in the database kept by the chief executive under section 280(1)(a)(i) of the Act. (4) If, at the commencement of this section, the mine has a standard operating procedure for managing and controlling a particular hazard at the mine. Arguments proliferate regarding the intent of the legislation with regards to the development of standard operating procedures. The renaming of work procedures such to a mine operating procedure (MOP) is one of the current miscreant acts being performed by mining management in a vain attempt to abrogate their legal obligations and the involvement of affected coal mine workers. A work procedure is to be an easy to understand, accessible and documented way of working, developed after consultation with the affected coal mine workers regardless of what title it is given, be it a JSA, JSEA, SLAM, HIT, Take 5, WRAC or a Box of Frogs etc..., and is subject to the legislative requirements prior to being implemented as part of the mines safety and health management system. Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999
32 Cooperation to achieve objects of Act
(1) This Act seeks to achieve cooperation between coal operators, site senior executives and coal workers to achieve the objects of the Act. (2) Cooperation is an important strategy in achieving the objects of the Act and is achieved— (a) at an industry level by— (i) the establishment of the coal mining safety and health advisory council under part 6; and (ii) the appointment of industry safety and health representatives under part 8; and (b) at coal mine level by— (i) the election of site safety and health representatives under part 7; and (ii) the process of involving coal mine workers in the management of risk. Corporate and senior coal mining management espouse that their operations aim for implausible targets such as “Zero Harm”, “A safe workplace that is injury and fatality free” or “Target Zero”. Implausible due to constant non compliance to not only the coal mining safety and health legislation but also their corporate charters, health, safety & environment policies and the mine’s safety and health management system. Only through trust, communication, training, involvement and consistency at all levels of the business can mining operations attempt to reach these goals. Consequently, as the coal industry progresses into a new year of economic uncertainty – safety must maintain its economic viability. History has shown that when the profits are being eaten into, spending on safety is one of the first to suffer cost cuts under the guise of returns for the share holder. I for one have not seen many share holders working at the coal face, the real share holders are the men and women who mine Queensland coal.
It is these people that rightly deserve to expect
that they will return home each working shift in the same physical and psychological condition that they arrived to work that shift.