Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=taylorfrancis. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Review of
International Political Economy.
http://www.jstor.org
PoliticalEconomy4:4 Winter1997:663-87
of International
Revieuw
ABSTRACT
This article argues that concepts and empirical characterizationsof glob-
alizationand corporateorganizationdrawn from the internationalpolitical
economy literaturemust be interrogatedcriticallybefore being extended
to agro-food studies. A brief survey of this literaturereveals divergent
conceptualizationsof globalizationand conflictingviews of the state. For
greater clarity, an ideal-typical taxonomy of world-scale processes and
corporateorganizationalforms is proposed. It is suggested that contem-
poraryglobal restructuringrepresentsthe combinedyet uneven interaction
of concurrentworld-scale processes. This framework is used to discuss
the limitations of some recent analyses of the globalization of agro-food
systems and offer suggestions for future research.
KEYWORDS
International political economy; world-scale processes; globalization;
corporateorganization;agro-food systems.
INTRODUCTION
There is growing recognition that critical agro-food studies have reached,
if not an impasse, then a crossroads, where different paths beckon. This
sense of uncertainty is strengthened by several recent contributions which
undermine confidence in theoretical perspectives previously thought to
provide promising organizational frameworks for the analysis of change
at a variety of scales in agro-food systems (Munton, 1992; Whatmore, 1994;
Goodman and Watts, 1994; Murdoch and Marsden, 1994; Lowe et al.,
1994). The perspectives being re-evaluated include regulation theory,
food regimes, Fordism/post-Fordism and related debates on the 'crisis'
of Fordism and transition to possible successor regimes. This revision-
ism, still incipient in agro-food studies, parallels the critical scrutiny
of these metatheoretical perspectives underway for several years now in
the industrial restructuring literature. A recent co-authored paper argues
? 1997 Routledge 0969-2290
THEME SECTION
I INTERNATIONALIZATION,
MULTINATIONALIZATION AND GLOBALIZATION
Forays into the literatureson internationalpolitical economy, industrial
innovation and corporate organization reveal wide disagreement,
as well as inconsistencies, in the analysis of internationalization,its
meaning, significance and empirical referents, as we see below. In the
agro-food literature, however, world-scale processes have not been
interrogatedat all closely. Globalization, for example, is contextualized
in terms of worldwide economic integration and the triumphalist
hegemony of neoliberal free market institutions and ideas; at the level
of corporateorganization,it is identified with the greaterlocational flex-
ibility of capital and, most particularly,the outsourcing of production.
Globalization frequently is associated temporally with the 'crises of
Fordism' and represents, it is argued, a paradigm shift in the structure
664
WORLD-SCALE PROCESSES AND AGRO-FOOD SYSTEMS
has been a marked featureof the vigorous debates in the economic geog-
raphy literatureon changing models of industrial accumulation,innova-
tion and spatial restructuring.6Apart from very recent reassessments of
Fordism/post-Fordism,the criticalrevisionist tenor of this literaturehas
had relatively limited influence on agro-food studies. One result of this
neglect, we suggest, is that concepts and empirical generalizationshave
slipped into the lexicon of agro-food studies without due criticalreflec-
tion. Globalization is very much a case in point, and it needs to be
'unpacked'and assessed against alternativeperspectives.
This articlehas argued that differentworld-scale processes and corpo-
rate organizationalforms intersectand coexist in the new 'global world'.
Ideal-types of these processes, corporate forms and associated interna-
tional political economies of production were described in Table 1.
In conjunction with the premise of interactive concurrence, these
ideal-typical characteristicsprovide several analytical points of entry
for attempts to locate agro-food systems and 'representative'firms in
world-scale processes. Although not examined here in detail, the frame-
work of interactive world-scale processes rejects globalization as a
uni-dimensional 'colonization of surfaces' in favor of an emphasis on
socio-spatial difference, which is empirically corroboratedby contem-
porary regional and industry studies of agro-food restructuring
(Goodman and Watts, 1997).More pertinently for present purposes, this
framework does not propose a linear, stage-like schema in which
common organizational forms and practices are uniformly adopted in
all sectors of activity. Thus, vanguard developments in corporatereor-
ganization, however indicative of the future structure of leading
industrial and service sectors of the world economy, may have little
or no direct relevance for agro-food systems. At the sectoral level,
rather than affix a common or generic label, the analytical challenge is
to establish how these systems 'fit' world-scale processes.
As a first step, this section examines recent studies of FDI, restruc-
turing and world-scale processes in agro-food systems. In fact, and
perhaps surprisingly,there are two literatures,methodologicallydivided
between, first, conventional industrial organization approaches to FDI
and, second, international production and a more eclectic political
economy tradition; their findings are rarely integrated in discussions
of internationalization.The former are theoretically grounded in indus-
trial economics and typically extend the structure-conduct-performance
framework of cross-industry comparative analysis pioneered by Bain
and others to evaluate the impacts of FDI in host countries. As we will
see, industrial organization studies suggest that the multinational
form of corporateorganizationnoted in Table 1 characterizesFDI in off-
farm agro-food sectors. The political economy tradition in agro-food
studies, by contrast, is less directly concerned with FDI and corporate
674
WORLD-SCALEPROCESSESAND AGRO-FOOD SYSTEMS
IV CONCLUSION
This discussion has identified new areas of investigation but we must
also rememberthat an extensive body of case-study materialis already
available in the agro-food and development literatures.One task there-
fore is to consolidate and review this material in the light of the new
internationalizationprocesses and changing patterns of competition.
For example, there is a rich vein of research on multinationalactivities
in past and current agricultural export sectors in Central America
(Williams, 1986;Murray and Hoppin, 1993; Conroy et al., 1994), but it
has yet to be established how far this experience is representative of
agro-food FDI in general. Further research on world-scale processes
would seek to situate these and other case studies within a compara-
tive regional analysis as part of a more comprehensiveinquiry into the
competitive behavior of agro-food multinationals.
The literatureon contractfarmingis a second richbut neglected source
on world-scale processes and corporate behavior, broadly defined to
681
THEME SECTION
NOTES
This article is dedicated to the memory of Richard Gordon, whose untimely
death robbed internationalpolitical economy of one of its most original contrib-
utors. The conceptual framework developed in this article draws heavily on
discussions with Richard Gordon, Paul Lubeck and Michel Perriardin 1993-4
at the UC SantaCruz Centerfor the Study of GlobalTransformations.A prelim-
inary version of this article was presented at the Conference on Restructuring
the Agro-Food System: Global Processes and National Responses, Centre for
682
WORLD-SCALE PROCESSES AND AGRO-FOOD SYSTEMS
683
THEME SECTION
10 For further discussion of the general analyticalimplications of these speci-
ficities, see Mann and Dickenson (1978);Mann (1990);Goodman et al. (1987);
and Fine et al. (1996).
11 On the volatile political economy of the frontierbeef cattle industry before
NAFTA, see Sanderson (1986, 1989).
12 For details of input sourcing and productive organization in industrial
maquilafirms, see Shaiken (1990) and Kenney and Florida (1994).
13 A related approach to these issues is to examine the changing boundaries
of the finn and how these are reconfiguredunder different (national)insti-
tutional arrangementsand traditions (Moralesand Quandt, 1992).
REFERENCES
Amin, A. (1994) 'Post-Fordism: models, fantasies and phantoms of transition',
in A. Amin (ed.) Post-Fordism:A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-39.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (eds) (1994) Globalization, Institutions, and Regional
Development in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arce, A. and Marsden, T. (1993) 'The social construction of international food:
a new research agenda', Economic Geography69 (3): 293-311.
Bonanno, A., Busch, L., Friedland, W., Gouveia, L. and Mingione, E. (eds) (1994)
From Columbus to Conagra. The Globalizationof Agriculture and Food, Lawrence:
University Press of Kansas.
Carnoy, M. (1993) 'Multinationalsin a changing world economy: whither the
nation-state?', in M. Carnoy, M. Castells, S. Cohen and F. H. Cardoso, The
New GlobalEconomyin the InformationAge, University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania
State University Press, pp. 45-96.
Connor, J., Richards, R., Marion, B. and Mueller, W. F. (1985) The Food
Manufacturing Industries: Structures, Strategies, Performance and Policies,
Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Conroy, M., Murray, D. L. and Rosset, P. (1994) Cultivating Crisis: Pesticides and
Development in Latin America, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dicken, P. (1992) GlobalShift: The Internationalizationof EconomicActivity, London:
The Guilford Press.
(1994) 'Global-local tensions: firms and states in the global space-economy',
Economic Geography,70 (4): 101-28.
Evans, P. (1987) 'Class, state and dependence in East Asia: lessons for Latin
Americanists', in F. C. Deyo (ed.) The Political Economy of the New Asian
Industrialism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 203-26.
Fine, B., Heasman, M. and Wright, J. (1996) Consumption in the Age of Affluence:
The World of Food, London: Routledge.
FitzSimmons, M. (1990) 'The social and environmental relations of U.S. agri-
culturalregions',in P. Lowe, T. Marsdenand S. Whatmore(eds) Technological
Change and the Rural Environment, London: David Fulton, pp. 8-32.
Friedland, W. H. (1994a) 'The new globalization: the case of fresh
produce', in A. Bonanno et al. (eds) From Columbus to Conagra. The
Globalization of Agriculture and Food, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press,
pp. 210-31.
(1994b) 'The global fresh fruit and vegetable industry: an industrial orga-
nization analysis', in P. McMichael (ed.) The GlobalRestructuring of Agro-Food
Systems,Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 173-89.
Frobel, F., Heinrichs, J. and Kreye, 0. (1980) The New International Division of
Labour,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
684
WORLD-SCALE PROCESSESAND AGRO-FOOD SYSTEMS
686
WORLD-SCALE PROCESSES AND AGRO-FOOD SYSTEMS
687