Você está na página 1de 61

Doc. Ref. No.

: UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01
Issue Version : 2.0
Date :

FINAL YEAR RESEARCH PROJECT


GUIDELINES

FOR

SUPERVISORS AND STUDENTS

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS


Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh,
Perak Darul Ridzuan
Tel: (05) 368-7565 Fax: (05) 365-6176

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. PURPOSE 2

3. SCOPE OF WORK 2

4. RESPONSIBILITIES 3
4.1 FYP Committee
4.2 Supervisor
4.3 Co-supervisor
4.4 Panel of examiners
4.5 Students

5. PROJECT PROCESS FLOW 8


5.1 Submission of Titles and Project Synopsis
5.2 Approval on Project Title, Synopsis and Assignment of Supervisor
5.3 Selection of Project Titles
5.4 Allocation of Approved Project Title
5.5 Submission of Preliminary Report/Progress Report
5.6 Approval for Purchase and Usage of Resources and Services
5.7 Submission of Progress Report
5.8 Submission of Interim/Final Draft
5.9 Project Exhibition
5.10 Oral Presentation
5.11 Submission of Bound Copy of Project Dissertation
5.12 Grading of Project

6. WRITING FORMAT 13
6.1 Preliminary Report/Progress Report/Interim Report/
Dissertation Outline
6.2 General Writing Format
6.3 General Content

7. SEMINAR 19

8. EVALUATION 20

9. GRADING SCHEME 20

10. COPYRIGHT 21

11. BARRING OF STUDENT 21

12. PLAGIARISM 22

13. COPYRIGHT 23

ii
14. APPENDICES 24

APPENDIX 1-1: Organisation Chart on Management of the Final Year Project

APPENDIX 1-2: Final Year Project Process Flow

APPENDIX 2-1: Suggested Milestone for the First Semester of 2 Semester Final Year Project

APPENDIX 2-2: Suggested Milestone for the Second Semester of 2 Semester

Final Year Project.

APPENDIX 2-3: Suggested Milestone for the One Semester Final Year Project

APPENDIX 3-1: FORM 01

APPENDIX 3-2: FORM 02

APPENDIX 3-3: FORM 03

APPENDIX 3-4: FORM 04

APPENDIX 3-5: FORM 05

APPENDIX 3-6: FORM 06

APPENDIX 3-7: FORM 07

APPENDIX 3-8: FORM 08

APPENDIX 3-9: FORM 09

APPENDIX 3-10: FORM 10

APPENDIX 3-11: FORM 11

APPENDIX 3-12: FORM 12

APPENDIX 4-1: SAMPLE OF PAGE SETUP

APPENDIX 5-1: SAMPLE OF DOCUMENTING SOURCES

APPENDIX 5-2: SAMPLE OF REFERENCE FORMATS

APPENDIX 6-1: SAMPLE OF TITLE PAGE

APPENDIX 6-2: SAMPLE OF FRONT HARD COVER

APPENDIX 7-1: SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL

APPENDIX 7-2: SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY

APPENDIX 8-1: SAMPLE OF ABSTRACT

APPENDIX 9-1: SAMPLE OF TABLE OF CONTENTS

iii
1. INTRODUCTION

All final year students in UTP are required to undertake a final year project (FYP)
paper, which is a design and/or research-based subject. This course is a compulsory
element in all programmes offered in UTP except for chemical engineering students
where this course becomes elective for students with CGPA higher than 3.0. The
credit hours and the semesters in which it is offered vary according to programmes as
in Table 1 below.

Table 1: FYP Credit hours/Semesters for each Programme

Programmes Course Code Credit hours / Semester


Chemical Engineering CAB 4163 3 credit hours / 1 semester
Mechanical Engineering MAB4012/4024 6 credit hours / 2 semesters
Electrical Engineering EAB4012/4034 6 credit hours / 2 semesters
Civil Engineering VAB4022/4034 6 credit hours / 2 semesters
Information Technology TAB3012/4014 6 credit hours / 2 semesters
Information System TAB3012/4014 6 credit hours / 2 semester
Petroleum Engineering 6 credit hours / 2 semester

It requires students to do research, design and/or development work in each discipline,

especially on real-world problems which would motivate them to produce practical

solutions. It is an opportunity for students to use the tools and techniques of problem-

solving to solve the problems they have encountered. With this approach, the learning

process is gained through 'by-doing' experience. Management concepts which provide

students with skills required for managing a project are also incorporated. Thus, the

students are expected to be well rounded by mastering various useful disciplines,

which will enable them to participate and prepare for future employment.

Working under the guidance of supervisor(s), students may shape the direction of

what they want to be in the near future, as well as gain better understanding of the

responsibilities they have to shoulder when they undertake a project. Teamwork spirit

will be inculcated with the development of good and professional relationship with

1
their supervisor(s) and colleagues. The undertaken project can also be used as a basis

for job employment by fully exploiting the learning process they have gone through,

the skills they have gathered and the experience they have gained from undertaking

the project.

This guideline is prepared for students and supervisors to enable them to execute

their respective roles and responsibilities in an effective manner, hence benefiting

both parties. With that, the success of implementation of this course can then be

realised.

2. PURPOSE

The purpose of the project is to develop a framework, which will enhance students'

skills in the process of applying knowledge, expanding thoughts, solving problems

independently and presenting findings through minimum guidance and supervision.

3. SCOPE OF WORK

The project can be in the form of laboratory experiments, computer programming,

modelling, simulations, analysis and product design. The area and scope of the project

should be narrowed down so that the project is feasible and could be completed within

the allocated time frame. The project work must exhibit element of originality, which

indicates the maturity level for the final year bachelor degree programme.

4. RESPONSIBILITIES

A team comprising of FYP Committee, Coordinator, Supervisor, Co-supervisor, Panel

of examiners and Students is formed to manage the final year project paper. They

should work closely with each other as shown in Appendix 1-1. It is the

responsibilities of each party to ensure that a project would be completed and

2
delivered within the project time frame. The team responsibilities are indicated as in

the Project Process Flow in Appendix 1-2.

4.1 FYP Committee

The Chairman of the FYP Committee for each Programme is the respective

Head of Department. The Coordinator and committee members are appointed

by the Head of Department.

4.1.1 The main tasks and responsibilities of the Coordinator are as follows:

a) To produce a milestone for managing final year project as

shown in Appendix 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3.

b) To identify the students who have registered for a final year

project.

c) To distribute the FYP Guidelines to students and supervisors.

d) To plan and manage the final year project process.

e) To collect the suggestions of project title proposal from the

lecturers, trainee lecturers, other staff and students. Please refer

to Form 01 in Appendix 3-1.

f) To submit all the project proposals to FYP Committee for

approval and to assign supervisor(s).

g) To release the list of approved projects for students' selection.

h) To collect the list of project titles selected by students. Please

refer to Form 02 in Appendix 3-2.

i) To forward Form 02 to FYP Committee for approval.

j) To release the FYP Committee's decision on project titles and

supervisor(s).

3
k) To brief the students and supervisors on the project

requirements based on the guidelines.

l) To co-ordinate a committee meeting to appoint panel of

examiners.

m) To endorse Form 03 and forward the form to FYP Committee

Chairman for approval on purchasing consumables and

equipment, technical support, nomination of advisors and other

related resources for the project. Please refer to Form 03 in

Appendix 3-3.

n) To arrange students’ oral presentation at the end of the

semester.

o) To collect the interim report/dissertation final draft from

students and forward it to the examiner for evaluation during

oral presentation at the end of the semester.

p) To compile the students’ assessment marks.

q) To collect three (3) hard cover copies of final dissertation from

students.

r) To coordinate post-mortem exercise. Please refer to Form 08

and 09 in Appendix 3-08 and 3-09.

s) To compile and retain Form 01, 02, 03, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11 and

12 for at least one year after graduation for auditing purposes.

4.1.2 The tasks of the FYP Committee Chairman and Committee

Members are as follows:

a) The Chairman is responsible for all final decision based on the

committee’s recommendations.

4
b) To ensure the initial project proposal is relevant to student’s

field of study.

c) To approve project title proposals.

d) To assign project supervisor(s).

e) To assign project titles to students.

f) To appoint Panel of Examiners.

g) To endorse final project grades.

h) To approve proposal on purchasing consumables and

equipment, technical support, nomination of advisors and other

resources related to projects.

4.2 Supervisor

Students will be supervised by one main supervisor, who is knowledgeable in

relevant field of expertise. Their responsibilities can be summarised as

follows:

(a) To work together with students until the submission of the final report.

(b) To assist students on the accessibility of the tools needed in the project.

(c) To monitor the schedule and progress of the students and their projects.

(d) To assist and guide students on the project and the preparation of

preliminary report (initial proposal), progress report and interim

report/dissertation according to the approved format.

(e) To assess students’ performance.

(f) To deliver their part of evaluation. Please refer to grading structure of

Table 3 in Section 8.

(g) To nominate a co-supervisor and notify the Coordinator.

(h) To forward proposal to Coordinator for endorsement on purchasing

consumables and equipment, technical support, nomination of advisors

5
and other related resources for the project. Please refer to Form 03 in

Appendix 3-3.

(i) To nominate Examiner(s) to FYP Committee.

(j) To compile and retain all evaluation for at least one year after

graduation for auditing purposes.

4.3 Co-Supervisor

The Co-Supervisor may be nominated by the Supervisor to assist

students in very specialized areas. The Co-Supervisor can be internal or

external (from outside UTP). The Co-Supervisor must be officially

appointed and is entitled for payment. The Co-Supervisor’s

responsibility is to guide students in solving specific task within his

expertise as and when necessary within the project time frame. In certain

cases, the Co-Supervisor may represent on behalf of the Supervisor in

oral presentation, evaluating the students’ progress and final dissertation.

4.4 Panel of Examiners

The FYP Committee appoints the Panel of Examiners. The Examiners will

function as project evaluators who are responsible to evaluate the oral

presentation and dissertation. Refer to Table 3 in Section 8. The Examiners

will be one from industry and one lecturer from other programmes. If it is not

possible to get an External Examiner from industry, FYP Committee can

appoint another lecturer from the same programme as a replacement.

4.5 Students

In completing the project, students are required to demonstrate their ability to

integrate fundamental knowledge in developing techniques, methods and

6
analyses. Students should take their own initiative such as proposing a title for

their project on their own. They are also required to work independently

through exercising self-discipline, self-management and job co-ordination

while undertaking the project. If working in a group, the students are expected

to exercise teamwork, co-operation, and trustworthiness to ensure the success

of the project.

Among the expected responsibilities are:

(a) To select a project topic on their own or the one suggested by the

Supervisor.

(b) To produce a preliminary report which clearly defines the objective(s)

and the scope of project work.

(c) To plan meeting schedule with their Supervisor.

(d) To adhere to the meeting schedule with the Supervisor for the purpose

of updating the progress and seeking advice on project matters.

(e) To record progress activities of their project in a logbook weekly and

compile it properly for record keeping.

(f) To submit the logbook to Supervisor during each meeting and to be

endorsed by Supervisor.

(g) To be responsible in finding alternative solutions for problems

encountered such as computer crashes and instrument failure.

(h) To submit all reports on time with no exception.

5. PROJECT PROCESS FLOW

The final year Project Flow Sheet is shown in Appendix 1-2.

5.1 Submission of Titles and Project Synopsis

7
(a) Lecturers will submit project proposals according to their interests

and expertises to the coordinator

(b) Students are also encouraged to propose their own project proposals

based on their interest and experience.

(c) All proposals must be submitted to FYP Coordinator for each

department using Form 01 as in Appendix 3-1 before the start of the

new semester.

5.2 Approval on Project Proposal and Assignment of Supervisor

a) The Coordinator will forward the list to the FYP committee for

approval.

b) The project proposal will be reviewed by the FYP Committee to ensure

the viability of the project.

c) The proposer will be called by the FYP Committee, if any clarification

is required.

d) Once the project is approved, the FYP Committee will endorse a

supervisor for the project.

e) The Coordinator will advertise the list of approved projects to the

students.

5.3 Selection of Project Titles

a) Students who did not submit a project proposal or their proposal have

been rejected by the FYP committee of the department, have to select a

maximum of three (3) titles from the given list in any order of

preference and submit to the Coordinator by using Form 02 in

Appendix 3-2.

8
b) The Coordinator will forward the students’ selections list to the FYP

Committee for them to assign approved projects to students.

5.4 Allocation of Approved Project Title

a) Students will be informed by the Coordinator on the awarded project

5.5 Submission of Preliminary Report/ Progress Report 1

Towards this submission, student should be able to fulfil the criteria as in

Form 04.

a) Write an abstract of the study

b) Identify problem statement, objective and scope of the study

c) Write the literature review

d) Explain the methodology to be used in the study

The procedure of the submission is as follows:

a) Students submit Preliminary Report/ Progress Report 1 to

Supervisor.

b) Supervisor will evaluate the report and submit the marks to the

Coordinator using Form 04 (Appendix 3-4).

5.6 Approval for Purchase and Usage of Resources and Services

a) If required, Supervisor will forward Form 03 (Appendix 3-3) to

Coordinator for the purchase of consumables and equipment,

nomination of Advisor(s), request for technical support, visit and other

resources related to the project as necessary. The Coordinator will then

forward the form to FYP Chairman for approval.

9
5.7 Submission of Progress Report / Progress Report 2 (Semester 1)

Towards the submission, students should be able to:

a) Write an abstract of the study

b) Identify problem statement, objective and scope of the study

c) Write the literature review

d) Explain the methodology to be used in the study

e) Report on the findings of the study

The procedures for submission are as follows:

a) Students will submit a Progress Report / Progress Report 2 to the

Supervisor.

b) Supervisor will evaluate the Progress Report and submit the marks to

the Coordinator using Form 05 as in Appendix 3-5.

5.8 Seminar

In this seminar students should be able to verbally report the progress of

their project with the supervisor, fellow students and other lecturers

attending the seminar. The seminar is also an avenue for the student to

get feedback on how to improve their project.

The seminar can be organised in small or large groups.

5.9 Project Exhibition

In this section, students should be able to:

a) Explain verbally to the audience about their project, through the

poster that they have designed.

b) demonstrate their ability to answer questions from the audience

effectively.

10
The procedures of project exhibition are as follows:

a. Students are required to produce poster for an exhibition at

departmental level

b. The evaluation of the poster is using Form 10 in Appendix 3-10.

c. The appointed internal examiner within the department will

evaluate the students’ posters.

5.10 Submission of Interim / Final Draft (Semester 2)

Towards the submission, students should be able to explain in writing

about the contents of the project and its significance, like the problem

statement, objectives, scope, literature review, methodology used, results,

conclusions and recommendations.

The procedures for submission are as follows:

a) Students are required to submit a draft for supervisors to vet and

approve.

b) Students will submit three (3) copies of final draft of their

dissertation to the Coordinator who will distribute them to the

Examiners. For two semester projects, students have to submit an

interim report whereby the contents are slightly similar to the final

dissertation.

c) Examiners will evaluate the draft using Form 06 in Appendix 3-6

after the oral presentation.

5.11 Oral Presentation

In this session, students should be able to:

11
a. verbally report the outcome of their final year project

b. demonstrate how well they are able to explain and understand the

project that they have been working on.

c. utilize their skills in oral presentation.

The procedures are as follows:

a) Oral presentation and evaluation will be conducted at scheduled time

using Form 07 in Appendix 3-7.

b) The Examiners will give comments on the final draft / interim report

and the oral presentation of the project.

c) Students have to defend their findings in the reports and make

necessary amendments as suggested by the Examiner before

submitting the final dissertation or interim report.

d) The presentation contents may focus on the following items:

 Problem Statement

 Objectives and Scope of Study

 Literature Review

 Procedure/Methodology

 Results and Findings

 Conclusion and Recommendation

e) The Panel of Examiners comprises the supervisor, an external

examiner and an internal examiner.

f) For FYP 1, the FYP Committee may not necessarily invite the

external examiner to evaluate the oral presentation and the

interim report in the first semester.

12
5.11 Submission of Hard-Bound Copy of Project Dissertation

a) Students must submit three (3) copies of project dissertations to Co-

ordinator as a reference for:

i. Supervisor
ii. Department
iii. Library

b) Students who fail to submit the hard-bound dissertation will not

receive their transcript results from the Examination Unit.

5.12 Grading of Project

a) The Coordinator will compile all the marks and obtain endorsement

from the FYP Committee.

b) The Coordinator will submit the endorsed result to the Exam Unit or

grading as mentioned in Section 9.

6. WRITING FORMAT

The writing of the preliminary report (initial report), progress report, interim report

and dissertation should adhere to the following format.

6.1 Preliminary Report/Progress Report/Interim Report/Dissertation Outline

The report consists of many parts arranged in a certain order. It is

recommended that the contents be arranged in the following order:

a) Title Page

b) Certification (only applicable for dissertation)

c) Abstract

d) Acknowledgements (only applicable for dissertation)

e) Table of Contents

13
f) List of Figures

g) List of Tables

h) Abbreviations and Nomenclatures

i) Chapter 1: Introduction

- Background

- Problem Statement

- Objectives and Scope of Study

j) Chapter 2: Literature Review and/or Theory

k) Chapter 3: Methodology/Project Work

l) Chapter 4: Results and Discussion

m) Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendation

n) References

o) Appendices

Students may write more than five chapters in their dissertations.

6.2 General Writing Format

Students must follow specific guidelines for writing all the reports as indicated

in Section 6.

a) Language

The dissertation must be written in an acceptable and formal English.

Use the passive voice.

b) Font and Spacing

All text should be 1.5 spacing between lines and 3 spacing between

paragraphs (Times New Roman regular font-style, size 12) written on a

white A4 paper on one side of each sheet.

The following however should be single spaced:

 Tables and figures


14
 Computer programs/source codes (must be reduced to font size

8)

c) Length

The maximum length of the report, excluding appendices is as follows:

Preliminary Report - 5 pages


Progress Report - 15 pages
Interim Report - 25 pages
Dissertation - 50 pages

Students are encouraged to use brief and straightforward wordings and

avoid jargon and passive voice as much as possible.

d) Pagination

All pages must be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to

the end of the report including pages on figures, tables, computer

programs and appendices. All front materials are numbered in small

Roman numerals (e.g. i, ii, iii). Page numbers appear by themselves

and are not to be enclosed in parenthesis, hyphens or other decorative

symbols. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and centred.

Please refer to Appendix 4-1.

e) Margin

The top, bottom and right margins are 25 mm except the left margin,

which is 40 mm. Please refer to Appendix 4-1. All paragraphs should

start from the left margin.

f) Mathematical Equations

Mathematical equations must be spaced out; superscript and subscript

must be clearly shown and numbered.

g) Heading

15
The report should not have more than three levels of numbered

headings as follows:

FIRST-LEVEL HEAD

1.1 Second-Level Head

1.1.1 Third-Level Head

All headings should be in Times New Roman and bold. Chapter and

major headings should be in capitals and in 14 font size and 12 font

size, respectively. Secondary and tertiary headings should be in title

case and in 12 font size. If there are more than three levels of headings,

please use italised bold font.

h) Tables and Figures

Tables and figures are considered part of the report if it is within the

main text. If they have the size that less than a page, they should be

inserted into the text near the point of reference with a 3 spacing from

the text. Tables should be on the same page. Margin limits of figures

and tables should be the same as the full-page text. All tables and

figures should be numbered consecutively. Table heading should be

positioned at the top middle of each table. The numbers for figure

should be positioned at the bottom middle of each figure. Refer to each

table or figure clearly in the text before placing it on the page. (For

example, “Figure 1 below shows ….)

i) Documenting Sources

Students are required to cite the sources from which ideas they are

using. Please refer to Appendix 5-1. The documentation system to

be used is American Psychological Association (APA).

j) References

16
The method of writing references must follow the standard format. The

sample reference format is in Appendix 5-2. This sample is using the

APA system.

k) Title Page

The title page of preliminary report (initial proposal), progress report

and interim report/dissertation should be set out in accordance with

the attached specimen sheet in Appendix 6-1 and should include the

following:

 The title of the dissertation.

 The full name of the candidate in FULL.

 The degree for which he/she is submitting the dissertation.

 The month and year in which the dissertation is submitted.

 The Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS address.

Students must submit three (3) hard cover copies of their dissertation to the

Coordinator. The Academic Office will keep one copy and the other one will

be kept in the Library. The hard cover colour for each programme is listed in

Table 2. Please refer to Appendix 6-2 for the writing format for the front hard

cover.

Table 2: Hard cover colour for each Programme

Programme Colour
Chemical Engineering Dark Green
Electrical & Electronic Engineering Dark Brown
Mechanical Engineering Maroon
Civil Engineering Black
Information Technology/Information System Dark Blue
Petroleum Engineering & Geoscience Dark Red

6.4 General Content

17
This section will elaborate more about the general content needed in each part

for each report format.

a) Title Page

The title of the report should reflect the focus on core issues of the

project work or related to it.

b) Certification

This section is divided into two: certification of approval and

certification of originality, as in Appendix 7-1 and 7-2. The

certification of approval should be signed by Supervisor after he/she is

satisfied with the corrections or amendments done by the student.

c) Abstract

An abstract is a short version of a report. It covers the report’s purpose,

scope, methodology, results and conclusion. Abstract should be not

more than one page as in Appendix 8-1.

d) Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements should include the names of the contributors to the

project work including the supervisors and the members of the group,

preferably not more than one page.

e) Table of Contents

Table of Contents lists all headings and sub-headings, tables, figures,

appendices, bibliography with the page numbers. It also includes the

certification, abstract and acknowledgement (if applicable). Please

refer to the sample in Appendix 9-1.

f) Introduction

Introduction must include the background of the project, the problem

statement, the objective(s) and scope of the study. Problem statement

needs to focus on the situation of the problem and research question

18
which lead to the objective(s) of the study. Students are required to

clarify the boundary project work to ensure the feasibility within the

given time frame.

g) Literature Review and/or Theory

Literature Review is the analytical, critical and objective review of

written materials on the chosen topic and area. It provides the

background information on the research question and to identify what

others have said and/or discovered about the question. It contains all

relevant theories, hypotheses, facts and data which are relevant to the

objective and the findings of the project.

h) Methodology/Project Work

Methodology refers to methods/procedure used by the student to

achieve the objective(s) of the project. The methods/procedure must be

relevant and acceptable.

i) Results and Discussion

This section presents the finding or outcome of project work. All the

gathered data from the project work must be presented in the form of

tables and figures such as graph, diagram or others. The data need to be

analysed, and the results need to be discussed.

j) Conclusion and Recommendation

Conclusion highlights the most significant findings in relation to the

objective(s) of the project. This section should also include

recommendations for future project work.

k) References

This section is the list of references used in the project. The method of

writing references must follow the standard format. Please refer to the

sample of reference format in Appendix 5-2.

19
l) Appendices

Lengthy calculations, figures, raw data, computer programs/source

codes, outputs, etc. are to be enclosed as appendices. They should be

titled and numbered in chronological order and capital letters. The

appendices and their titles need to be listed in the Table of Contents.

Provide title for each appendix, like “Appendix 1. Questionnaire

Sample”.

7. SEMINAR

a) The purpose of this seminar is to report the progress of the project that the

student is working on and get the feedback from the supervisor to improve their

work. In this seminar, students should be able to:

a. Demonstrate their ability to verbally explain their project before an

audience

b. Utilize their skills in oral presentation

b) The procedure of conducting a seminar is up to the discretion of each

department. The evaluation will be based on the form 11, Seminar Assessment

Form in Appendix 3-11 and form 12 in Appendix 3-12.

8. EVALUATION

Students are evaluated based on their capability in undertaking the project, producing

the written report and presenting the result. Overall commitment, as well as personal

conduct, is also to be observed at all time. The main components of evaluation and the

grading structure are given in Table 3.1, Table 3.2 and Table 3.3.

Table 3.1: Grading Structure for ONE Semester Programme for Chemical
Engineering only.

20
Assessment Contribution (%)

Supervisor Panel of Examiners


Preliminary Report 2.5 -
Progress Report 2.5 -
Exhibition / Exposition - 10
Seminar 5
Dissertation 30 20
Oral Presentation 10 20
Total 45 55

Table 3.2: Grading Structure for TWO Semester Programme (Part 1)

Assessment Contribution (%)

Supervisor Panel of Examiners


Preliminary Report 5 -
Progress Report 5 -
Seminar 10
Dissertation/Interim 30 20
Oral Presentation 10 20
Total 50 50

Table 3.3: Grading Structure for TWO Semester Programme (Part 2)

Assessment Contribution (%)

Supervisor Panel of Examiners


Progress Report I 2.5 -
Progress Report II 2.5 -
Exhibition / Exposition - 10
Seminar 5
Dissertation 30 20
Oral Presentation 10 20
Total 45 55

9. GRADING SCHEME
Students will be graded according to the UTP grading scheme as in Table 4.

Table 4: UTP Grading Scheme

Score Grade Point

21
85 – 100 A 4.0
80 – 84.9 A- 3.75
75 – 79.9 B+ 3.5
65 -74.9 B 3.0
55 – 64.9 C+ 2.5
50 – 54.9 C 2.0
45 – 49.9 D+ 1.5
40 – 44.9 D 1.0
0 - 39.9 F 0.0

10. CLAIMS

Students are entitled to final year project claims of RM 250 per semester for the

following items.

a) Consumables and equipment

b) Testing/technical support

c) Consultation or other support

d) Travel/visit for data requisition (with the most economical

mode of travel)

e) Procurement of data

f) Exhibition posters

All claims shall be submitted using Form 03 to the Supervisor, required support
from the Coordinator and to be endorsed by FYP Chairman.

11. BARRING OF STUDENT

a) Barring from continuing the project

i) Students shall be barred from the project on week 9 if TWO (2)

consecutive reports are not submitted by Week 8. As a consequence,

students will earn a grade of F.

ii) Students will also be barred if they do not officially select the topic (fail to

submit Form 1 and 2).

b) Barring from presentation


22
Students shall be barred from the presentation if they do not participate in

both the seminar and exposition. As a consequence, students will earn a

grade of F and will not be allowed to submit their thesis.

12. PLAGIARISM

Plagiarism is the act of obtaining or attempting to obtain credit for academic


work by representing the work of another as one's own without the necessary
and appropriate acknowledgment. More specifically, plagiarism is:

a. The act of incorporating the ideas, words of sentences, paragraphs, or parts


thereof without appropriate acknowledgment and representing the product
as one's own work; and

b. The act of representing another's intellectual work such as musical

composition, computer program, photographs, painting, drawing, sculpture,

or research or the like as one's own.

Source: www.sonoma.edu/uaffairs/policies/cheatingpolicy.htm

If a student is in doubt about the nature of plagiarism, he/she should discuss the
matter with the supervisor. If a student is caught committing plagiarism, stern
action will be taken against the student

13. COPYRIGHT
The university shall be the owner for all findings, designs, patents, and other

intellectual property rights.

23
CHAIRMAN
(HEAD OF DEPARTMENT)

COORDINATOR &
COMMITTEE

SUPERVISOR(S)
EXAMINER(S)

CO-SUPERVISOR(S)

EXTERNAL
INTERNAL EXAMINER SUPERVISOR EXAMINER (FYP
(WITHIN DEPARTMENT) II only)
STUDENTS

APPENDIX 1-1
Figure 1: Organisation chart on the management of the Final Year Project

24
APPENDIX1-2 PROJECT
FLOW

Process Responsibility / Document


Action

START

5.1 Submission of Lecturers, Students


Titles & Project (optional), Coordinator Form 01
Synopsis

NOT
ACCEPTEP
5.2 Approval List of
Coordinator, FYP
on Project Approved
Committee
Proposal & Titles &
Supervisor Supervisors

Students,
Coordinator, FYP Form 02
Committee

5.4 Allocation of Students,


Approved Project Coordinator Form 02
Titles

5.5 Submission of Preliminary/


Students Progress
Preliminary
Report/ Progress Report
Report

Assessment Supervisor, Form 04/


Coordinator Form 08

5.8 Seminar Students,


(Optional) Coordinator,
Examiner Form 04

5.6 Purchase & Students, Supervisor,


Usage of Coordinator, FYP
Chairman Form 03
Resources and
Services
(Optional)

25
APPENDIX1-2 PROJECT
FLOW

Process Responsibility / Document


Action

5.7 Submission of Student,


Supervisor Progress
Progress Report
Report

Supervisor,
Assessment Coordinator
Form 05/
Form 08

11.0 Barring
of Student

NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT

Grade F MEET
REQUIREMENT

Students,
5.8 Seminar Coordinator,
Examiner Form 05

5.9 Project Students,


Exhibition (Sem2) Coordinator,
Examiners Form 13

5.10 Submission Students,


Supervisor Final
of Interim/Final
Draft
Draft

Supervisor,
Assessment Coordinator, Form 06/
Examiner Form 09

26
APPENDIX1-2 PROJECT
FLOW

Process Responsibility / Document


Action

10.0 Barring
from Presentation

NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT
MEET
REQUIREMENT
Grade F

Students,
5.11 Oral Supervisor,
Form 07/
Presentation Examiners, FYP
Form 10
committee

Amendment on Students,
Supervisor, Interim/
the Final Draft as
Examiners Dissertation
Advised
Final Draft

5.12 Submission Students, 3 Copies of


of Hard-Bound Coordinator Project
Copy of Project Dissertation
Dissertation

Coordinator, FYP
5.13 Grading of Committee, Exam
Project Unit

END

27
Mid-Semester Break
Mid-semester break
No. Detail/ Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 Selection of Project Topic

2 Preliminary Research Work

3 Submission of Preliminary Report

4 Seminar 1 (optional)
Suggested Milestone for the Second Semester of 2-Semester Final Year Project
Suggested
5 Project Milestone
Work for the First Semester of 2-Semester Final Year Project

6 Submission of Progress Report

7 Seminar 2 (compulsory)

8 Project work continues

9 Submission of Interim Report Final Draft

10 Oral Presentation

Suggested milestone
Process

APPENDIX
28

APPEND
2-2
2-1
No. Detail/ Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Mid-Semester Break
1 Project Work Continue

2 Submission of Progress Report 1

3 Project Work Continue

4 Submission of Progress Report 2

5 Suggested Milestone for One Semester Final Year Project (for Chemical Engineering only)
Seminar (compulsory)

5 Project work continue

6 Poster Exhibition

7 Submission of Dissertation (soft bound)

8 Oral Presentation

9 Submission of Project Dissertation (Hard Bound)

Suggested milestone
Process

APPENDIX 2
29
3
No. Detail/ Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 Selection of Project Topic

2 Preliminary Research/Design Work

3 Submission of Preliminary Report (Initial Proposal)

4 Project Work

5 Submission of Progress Report

6 Seminar

6 Project work continue

7 Submission of Dissertation Final Draft

8 Oral Presentation

9 Submission of Project Dissertation

Suggested milestone
Process

30
APPENDIX 3-1

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.01 2.0 XX XXX 2006

FORM 01

FINAL YEAR PROJECT TITLE PROPOSAL

Project Title:

Proposer’s Name : ______________________________________________________


Suggested supervisor (if any) : _____________________________________________
Collaborator(s) (if any) :
Problem Statement:

Objectives:

Pre-requisite (if any):

Short summary of the research project:

Tools/equipment required:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Area / specialization:

31
APPENDIX 3-2

Doc. Ref. No.Issue VersionDateUTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.022.0XX


XXX 2006 FORM 02

TOPIC SELECTION

(To be completed by student in 2 copies.)

Semester : January / July Year: _________________________


Name : _________________________________________________________
Student No : ____________________________ Programme: __________________

List of topic chosen (ranking in order of preference):


Proj. No. Proj. Title Supervisor
1
2
3

Justification for the chosen topics:


____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Students should return this form within three days on the first week of the semester to
respective department Final Year Project Coordinator

COMMITTEE DECISION

Topic approved:_____________________________________________

Approved by Coordinator
(only for Supervisor-allocated titles)
Signature:

Official stamp:

Date:

32
APPENDIX 3-3

Doc. Ref. No.Issue VersionDateUTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.032.0XX


XXX 2006 FORM 03

FINAL YEAR PROJECT REQUISITION FORM

(Note: Supervisor can use this form to request (a )purchasing consumables and equipment , (b) testing /
technical support, (c) consultations fees and other related resources to the project, (d) visit for data
collection.)
REQUESTED BY
Supervisor’s Name
Project Title
Supervisor’s Signature
Student’s Name
Date

No. Description Purpose Quantity

ENDORSEMENT BY CO-ORDINATOR APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN


Name Name
Programme Programme
Signature Signature
Date Date
Comment: Approval
Approve Not Approve
Comment:

* Please attach this form with original receipt or any proof of purchase. APPENDIX 3-4

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.07 1.0 22 JUNE 2001

33
FORM 04

FYP Part I - PRELIMINARY REPORTING AND SEMINAR SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________


Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________

Please circle the appropriate grade for each category


Excellent*

FailureVery Bad –

(Mark Awarded)
Criteria for

Very Good*

AverageAbove

Marginal Pass
Just Average

Very Poor-
Category Judging Quality

Below Average
Good

Poor
• Clear and concise Background
Project of Study
Background • Problem Statement
(20) - Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project
within the Scope and Time
frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature A A- D+ F
Review (30) • Citation and cross referencing (30) (25)
B+ B C+ C (15)
D
(6)
• Relevancy and recentness of (24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5) (13.5)
the literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology • Project activities
(20) • Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tool (eg. Equipment,
hardware, etc.) required.
• Fluency and choice of words
Clarity of (using language clearly and
presentation, accurately) Pronunciation,
Non-verbal articulation C D+ D F
Communication A A- B+ B C+
• Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) objects etc)
• Appearance; Facial
expression; Confidence
• Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses
• Technical and factual
Questions and accuracy; Grasp of subject C D+ D F
A A- B+ B C+
Answers (20) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Creativity – use of example (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)

TOTAL SCORE /100

Comments:

.…………………………
Supervisor’s /Examiner’s signature

Name:_____________________________________ Date: ____________

34
APPENDIX 3-5

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08 2.0 Xx xx

FORM 05

FYP Part I - PROGRESS REPORTING AND SEMINAR SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor)


Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________
Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________

Please circle the appropriate grade for each category


Excellent*

FailureVery Bad –

(Mark Awarded)
Criteria for

Very Good*

AverageAbove

Marginal Pass
Just Average

Very Poor-
Category Judging Quality

Below Average
Good

Poor
• Clear and concise Background
Project of Study
Background • Problem Statement
(20) - Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Objective and Scope of (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
Study
• The Relevancy of the
Project
• Feasibility of the Project
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature A A- D+ F
Review (30) • Citation and cross referencing (30) (25)
B+ B C+ C (15)
D
(6)
• Relevancy and recentness of (24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5) (13.5)
the literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology • Project activities
(10) • Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tool (eg. Equipment,
hardware, etc.) required.
Result and • Data Gathering and Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Discussion (10)
• Experimentation/Modelling (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)

Conclusion (10) A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Relevancy to the Objectives (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Fluency and choice of words
Clarity of (using language clearly and
presentation, accurately) Pronunciation,
Non-verbal articulation C D+ D F
Communication A A- B+ B C+
• Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) objects etc)
• Appearance; Facial
expression; Confidence
• Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses
• Technical and factual
Questions and accuracy; Grasp of subject C D+ D F
A A- B+ B C+
Answers (10) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Creativity – use of example (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)

TOTAL SCORE /100

Comments:

.…………………………
Supervisor's signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________

35
APPENDIX 3-6

Doc. Ref. No.Issue VersionDateUTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.091.022


JUNE 2001
FORM 06
FYP Part I - INTERIM REPORT SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)


Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________
Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________

Please circle the appropriate grade for each category

PassVery Poor – Marginal

(Marks Awarded)
Very Bad - Failure
Above Average
Very, Very Good

Just Average
Criteria for

Very Good
Category
Excellent

Judging Quality

Good

Poor
• Objective(s)
• Problem statement A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Abstract (10) Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Methodology
Findings
Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (10)
• Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature Review A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
and/or Theory (20) • Citation and cross referencing (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (20) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (10) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and Relevancy to the Objectives
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations • Suggested Future Work for (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) Expansion and Continuation
• Compliance to standard guideline
• Format
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Others (10) • Neatness
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Proper English Usage
• Writing Skill
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)

Comments:

36
.………………………… APPENDIX 3-7
Supervisor/ Examiner’s signature
Doc. Ref. No.Issue VersionDateUTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.101.022 JUNE
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
2001
FORM 07

FYP Part I - FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor/Examiner)

Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________

Project Title : _________________________________________________________


Programme : _________________________________________________________
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category

PassVery Poor – Marginal

(Marks Awarded)
Very Bad - Failure
Above Average
Very, Very Good

Just Average
Criteria for

Very Good
Category
Excellent

Judging Quality

Good

Poor
Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (10) • Objective and Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within the
Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature Review A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Citation and cross referencing (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
and/or Theory (20)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware, etc.)
required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (10) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and Relevancy to the Objectives
• Suggested Future Work for Expansion A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) and Continuation
• Fluency and choice of words (using
Clarity of language clearly and accurately)
C D+ D F
presentation (10) Pronunciation, articulation A A- B+ B C+
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, objects (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
etc)
• Continuity of Presentation
Non-verbal • Appearance; Facial expression; C D+ D F
Confidence A A- B+ B C+
Communication (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
(10)
• Technical and factual accuracy; Grasp of
Questions and subject
Answers (20) • Creativity – use of example A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
(20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Convincing Answer, Showing creativity
and Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)

Comments:

37
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________

38
APPENDIX 3-8
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08 2.0 Xx xx

FORM 08

FYP Part II PROGRESS REPORTING AND SEMINAR SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor)


Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________
Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
Excellent*

FailureVery Bad –

(Mark Awarded)
Criteria for

Very Good*

AverageAbove

Marginal Pass
Just Average

Very Poor-
Category Judging Quality

Below Average
Good

Poor
• Clear and concise Background of
Project Study
Background • Problem Statement
(10) - Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Review (10) • Citation and cross referencing (30) (25) (24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5) (15) (13.5) (6)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
• Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Methodology (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Gantt Chart (5.5)
(10)
• Tool (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
• Data Gathering and Analysis
Result and A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling (30) (25) (24) (22.5) (19.5) (15) (13.5) (6)
Discussion (30) (16.5)
• Prototype
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Conclusion (20) • Relevancy to the Objectives (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)

• Fluency and choice of words


(using language clearly and
Clarity of accurately) Pronunciation,
presentation, articulation
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Non-verbal • Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Communication objects etc)
(10) • Appearance; Facial expression;
Confidence
• Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses
• Technical and factual
accuracy; Grasp of subject A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Questions and • Creativity – use of example (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Answers (10)

TOTAL SCORE /100

Comments:

.…………………………

39
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
APPENDIX 3-9
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08 2.0 Xx xx

FORM 09

FYP Part II - DISSERTATION SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)


Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________
Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________

Please circle the appropriate grade for each category

PassVery Poor – Marginal

(Marks Awarded)
Very Bad - Failure
Above Average
Very, Very Good

Just Average
Criteria for

Very Good
Category
Excellent

Judging Quality

Good

Poor
• Objective(s)
• Problem statement
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Abstract (10) Scope of Study
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Methodology
Findings
Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (20)
• Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature Review A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
and/or Theory (10) • Citation and cross referencing (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (30) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- D+ F
B+ B C+ C D
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (30) (25) (15) (6)
(24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5) (13.5)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and Relevancy to the Objectives
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations • Suggested Future Work for (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) Expansion and Continuation
• Compliance to standard guideline
• Format
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Others (10) • Neatness
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Proper English Usage
• Writing Skill
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)

Comments:

40
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature APPENDIX 3-10
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08 2.0 Xx xx

FORM 10

FYP Part II – FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION SCORE SHEET

(To be completed by Supervisor/Examiner)

Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________

Project Title : _________________________________________________________


Programme : _________________________________________________________
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category

PassVery Poor – Marginal

(Marks Awarded)
Very Bad - Failure
Above Average
Very, Very Good

Just Average
Criteria for Very Good
Category
Excellent

Judging Quality
Good

Poor
Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (10) • Objective and Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within the
Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
• Critical analysis of literature
Literature Review A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Citation and cross referencing
and/or Theory (10) (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware, etc.)
required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (20) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and Relevancy to the Objectives
• Suggested Future Work for Expansion A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) and Continuation
• Fluency and choice of words (using
Clarity of language clearly and accurately)
C D+ D F
presentation (10) Pronunciation, articulation A A- B+ B C+
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, objects (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
etc)
• Continuity of Presentation
Non-verbal • Appearance; Facial expression; C D+ D F
Confidence A A- B+ B C+
Communication (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
(10)
• Technical and factual accuracy; Grasp of
Questions and subject
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Answers (20) • Creativity – use of example
(20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Convincing Answer, Showing creativity
and Innovativeness

41
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)

Comments:

.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
APPENDIX 3-11

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-CHEM-11 1.0 19 July 2004

FORM 11

POST-MORTEM SURVEY FORM FOR STUDENTS

(To be completed by the students)

Name (optional):_________________________________________________
Programme :_________________________________________________

Please provide us with the comments on the matters highlighted below:

1. Supervision (eg. availability, adequate guidance & time etc.)

2. The guideline booklet

3. Coordination

4. Project work (eg. scope, workload etc.)

42
5. Reports and presentation

APPENDIX 3-8
6. Logbook

7. Exhibition / Poster presentation

8. Services, resources and facilities

9. Schedule and milestone

10. Examiners and evaluation

11. Other recommendations

43
Note : If the space provided is not sufficient, please use extra sheets.

44
APPENDIX 3-12

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-CHEM-12 1.0 19 July 2004

FORM 12

POST-MORTEM SURVEY FORM FOR SUPERVISORS

(To be completed by the supervisors)

Name : ______________________________________________________
Programme : ______________________________________________________

Please provide us with the comments on the matters pointed below:

1. Supervision (incld. workload)

2. Students performance

3. Examiners and evaluation

4. Project work (eg. scope, workload etc.)

5. Logbook

45
APPENDIX 3-12
6. Services, resources and facilities

7. Schedule and milestone

8. Other recommendations

Note : If the space provided is not sufficient, please use extra sheets.

46
APPENDIX 3-13

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date


UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-CHEM-12 1.0 19 July 2004
FORM 13

FYP Part II -POSTER PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

(To be completed by Supervisor/Examiner)

Student’s Name : _________________________________________________________


Project Title : _________________________________________________________
Programme : _________________________________________________________
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
Excellent*

FailureVery Bad –

(Mark Awarded)
Criteria for

Below Average
Very Good*

AverageAbove

Marginal Pass
Just Average

Very Poor-
Judging Quality

Good

Poor
1. Opening (10)
• Introduction
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Opening statement
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Confidence

2. Content (50)
• Suitability of topic
• Accuracy
• Introduction and background information
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Analytic content
(50) (42.5) (40) (37.5) (32.5) (27.5) (25) (22.5) (10)
• Thoroughness
• Reader friendly layout (typography, color,
graphic images, etc.)
• Grammar, spelling and vocabulary
3. Conclusion (10)
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Choice and use of effective closing
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
techniques
4. Questions and Answers (10)
• Ability to anticipate and answer questions
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Ability to maintain good relationship with
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
questioners
• Knowledge of the subject
5. Delivery (20)
• Vocal clarity: volume, rate, articulation,
pronunciation
• Vocal quality: natural, conversational,
varied, emphasis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Eye contact (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Professionalism: appearance, confidence,
enthusiasm
• Organization: logical flow, time
management
TOTAL SCORE
/100

OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)

Comments:

.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature

47
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________

APPENDIX 4-1
SAMPLE OF PAGE SETUP

Top margin

1.0” 25mm

50 mm
1.5 spacing,
Times New
Roman,
capital, CHAPTER 1
bold and
14 font size
TITLE OF THE CHAPTER
Double spacing,
Times New Roman,

1. MAJOR HEADING

The main objective of this programme is to prepare all


1.5 spacing, students….
Times New
Roman, 12
font size In order to fulfill the need of …..
1.0”
25mm
1.1 Secondary Heading
Right
Margin
The main objective of this programme is to prepare all
students….
40 mm
1.1.1 Tertiary Heading
Left
margin
The main objective of this programme is to prepare all
students….

1.0” 2

Bottom Margin Page number at center of the


footer section

48
APPENDIX 5-1
SAMPLE OF DOCUMENTING SOURCES

The followings are the variations of APA Citations. For further reference, please refer
to the internet under Documenting Sources.

1. The author’s name appears as part of the introduction to the quotation or


paraphrase.

Gilster (1993) is very definite: “Simply put, the Internet is changing so rapidly, with
so many new databases, services, addresses, and projects, that it can’t be neatly
encapsulated in any one set of commands or maxims” (p.2).

2. The author is not named in the introduction to the quotation or paraphrase.

What is entirely clear is that the Internet “can’t be neatly encapsulated in any one
set of commands or maxims” (Gilster, 1993, p.2).

3. The author has several works listed in the References. If they have different dates,
no special treatment is necessary; if an author has two works dated the same year,
differentiate them in the text and in the References with a lower-case letter after
each date (1993a,1993b).

Gilster (1993a) points out that the Internet “ can’t be encapsulated in any one set of
commands or maxims” (p.2).

4. Paraphrases are handled like quotations. Give the author’s last name, the date, and
the appropriate page numbers.

Gilster (1993) says that the Internet changes so fast that you must come to see your
experience with it as daily learning process.

34
APPENDIX 5-1
5. When citing block quotations, the period is placed before the page parentheses.
Do not place quotation marks before and after a block quotation. Indent the left
margin 5 spaces and double-space. Do not indent the right margin.

According to Gilster (1993)


There can be no complete printed directory of the Internet. Those who
write about this globe-spanning network are destined to labor forever
behind the technological wave. Simply put, the Internet is changing so
rapidly, with so many new databases, services, addresses, and projects,
that it can’t be neatly encapsulated in any one set of commands or maxims.
The more you use the Internet, the more you will realize that each day is
itself a learning process.(p. 2)

35
SAMPLE OF REFERENCE FORMATS

The format of references for the respective sources is as follows:


1. journal refer to Meguid and Zhu (1995)
2. book refer to Glister P. (1993)
3. book in series refer to Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. (1989)
4. article in book/conference proceedings refer to Eskey, D and Grabe, W.
(1988)
5. thesis refer to Mohd Shariff, A. (1995)
6. interview refer to Abu Bakar, R (2003)
7. technical report refer to Wawrznek, P.A. and Ingraffea, A.R. (1991)
8. website refer to Duncan, Donna. (1998)

Duncan, Donna. 6 Sept 1998 <http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Coffeehouse/1652/>.


Klein-Smith, Sarah. 6 Sept 1998 <http://members.aol.com/~sklein2/>

Eskey, D and Grabe, W. 1988, "Interactive models for second language reading" in
P. Carrell, J. Devine and D. Eskey (Eds) Interactive approaches to Second
Language Reading , Cambridge; Cambridge University Press

Glister P. 1993, The Internet Navigator, New York, John Wiley & Sons

Abu Bakar, R. Manager of Technical Services. Intel, Penang. Personal Interview.


Dec. 14. 2003.

Meguid, S.A. and Zhu, Z.H., 1995, "A novel finite element for treating
inhomogeneous solids," International Journal Numerical Methods
Engineering 38 (2): 1579-1592

Mohd Shariff, A. 1995, Steam Regeneration of A Fixed Bed Adsorption System,


Ph.D. Thesis, Leeds University, United Kingdom

Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. 1989. Finite Element Analysis of Composite Laminates,
(7), New York, Pergamon Press

Wawrznek, P.A. and Ingraffea, A.R. 1991. Discrete modeling of crack propagation:
theoretical aspects and implementation issues in two and three dimensions.
Report Number 91-5, Cornell University, New York, USA

36
APPENDIX 6-1
SAMPLE OF TITLE PAGE

Application of Collagen as a Filter Aid in Water Treatment Process

by

Ahmad Nawab Bin Ahmad Al-Bab

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of


the requirements for the
Bachelor of Engineering (Hons)
(Chemical Engineering)

JANUARY 2006

Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS


Bandar Seri Iskandar
31750 Tronoh
Perak Darul Ridzuan

37
APPENDIX 6-2
SAMPLE OF FRONT HARD COVER
INTAN BT. A. RAHIM

EFFECT OF pH AND TEMPERATURE ON THE


RATE OF MINERALS LEACHED FROM MINERAL
STONES
B. ENG. (HONS) CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

INTAN BINTI A. RAHIM

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
JANUARY 2006

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS


JANUARY 2006

*Font : 14 Times New Roman

38
APPENDIX 7-1
SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL

CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL

Application Of Collagen As A Filter Aid In Water Treatment Process

by

Ahmad Nawab Bin Ahmad Al-Bab

A project dissertation submitted to the


Chemical Engineering Programme
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (Hons)
(CHEMICAL ENGINEERING)

Approved by,

_____________________
(Name of Main Supervisor)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS

TRONOH, PERAK

January 2006

39
APPENDIX 7-2
SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY

CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY

This is to certify that I am responsible for the work submitted in this project, that the

original work is my own except as specified in the references and

acknowledgements, and that the original work contained herein have not been

undertaken or done by unspecified sources or persons.

___________________________________________
AHMAD NAWAB BIN AHMAD AL-BAB

40
APPENDIX 8-1
SAMPLE OF ABSTRACT

The following abstract is taken from Ramos, Juan, Florentina Davalos, and Jorge
Sandoval. High-brightness CMP from Eucalyptus globulus using a nitric acid
pretreatment. TAPPI Journal 79 (12 December 1996): 169-177. Copyright TAPPI
1996.

A high-brightness, high-yield cheminmechanical pulp was obtained from Eucalyptus


globulus using low-environmental-impact chemical reagents. The pulping chemicals
were nitric acid and sodium hydroxide, and bleaching chemical was hydrogen
peroxide. Chips were impregnated for 24 h in nitric acid, cooked under variable
conditions, washed, impregnated with soda for 24 h, cooked again, rewashed,
defibrated, refined, screened, and finally bleached under variable conditions. Under
the optimal pulping conditions identified in this study, pulp strength was not
especially high (tensile strength 2.04 km, tea strength 3.9 mN m2/g), but the ease of
bleaching and final pulp brightness were impressive enough (light-scattering
coefficient 49.3 m2kg, brightness 81.3% Elrepho) to warrant further research.

41
APPENDIX 9-1
SAMPLE OF TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTIFICATION . . . . . . i

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . . . . . . iii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION . . . . 1
1.1 Background of Study . . . 1
1.2 Problem Statement . . . 2
1.3 Objectives and Scope of Study . 3

CHAPTER 2: THEORY . . . . . 4
2.1 Leaching . . . . 4

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY . . . . 5
3.1 Elements Determination . . 5
3.2 Sample Preparation . . . 7
3.3 Sample Testing . . . 9

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . 11


4.1 Data Gathering & Analysis . . 11
4.2 Results and Discussion . . 16

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 23


5.1 Conclusion . . . . 23
5.2 Recommendations . . . 24

REFERENCES . . . . . . . 25

APPENDICES . . . . . . . 27

42
APPENDIX 9-1
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Rhyolite stone used for the study 3


Figure 1.2 Porphyritic-Rhyolite 5
Figure 1.3 Porphyritic texture 6
Figure 3.1 Process of leaching in the pores of stone 10
Figure 4.1 Concentration of elements extracted from the mineral stone 16
Figure 4.2 Concentration of elements against time in pH 5 solution 17
Figure 4.3 Concentration of elements against time in pH 6 solution 18
Figure 4.4 Concentration of elements against time in pH 8 solution 18
Figure 4.5 Concentration of elements against time in 30 0 C solution 19
Figure 4.6 Concentration of elements against time in 35 0 C solution 21
Figure 4.7 Concentration of elements against time in 40 0 C solution 22

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Essential mineral elements for human consumption 2


Table 2.1 Recommended intake of elements by US RDA 4
Table 3.1 Range of standard solutions use for AAS testing 7
Table 4.1 Conditions for optimum amount of elements leached from the stone 8
Table 4.2 Concentration of elements adsorbed by the glass container 9
Table 4.3 Concentration of elements in the container after 4 hours 12
Table 4.4 Impurities in different materials 14

43

Você também pode gostar