Form No :

SUBCONTRACTORS EVALUATION FORM FOR:

Project :

Subcontractor evaluation is summarized in table below.

The evaluation was based on the following
criteria and are assessed as :

1. Poor - 1 point 2. Satisfactory - 2 points 3. Good - 3 points

Evaluation result is denoted by :

Rating (%) Evaluation Results

70 - 100 Green - Recommended for future projects
69 - 55 Yellow - Recommended for future projects
but with minor concern.
54 & below Red - Not recommended for future projects

SUBCONTRACTOR
Dialog Fabricator Sdn Bhd

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Compliance to HSE & CIDB requirements M
Ability to meet schedule M
Effectiveness of site supervision M
Head office/Principal supports N
Technical ability of staff N
Interaction with Dialog site management N
Quality of work performed M
Knowledge of the work to be performed N
Familiarity with Project Requirement N
Availability of equipments and tools N
Willingness to cooperate N
Responsiveness to recovery plan N
House Keeping N
RATING (%)
EVALUATION RESULTS
COST EFFECTIVENESS
O =Single source 1 =Lowest bidder
2 =2nd lowest 3 =3rd lowest
Remarks:
(Please provide justification if any of the above
criteria rated poor performance - 1)

N denotes non-mandatory criteria Prepared by : __________ Date of evaluation: ________

(Site Designated Personnel)
M denotes mandatory criteria :
A poor performance in any of these Reviewed by : __________ Date: ____________
criteria would be `RED' for evaluation (Head of Contracts)
result.
Agreed by : _______________ Date: ____________
(Project Manager)
Page 1 of 1
SubconEvaluation Form