Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Year 2018/2019
CTCal-2019|SM
*Ref. 1 in list of main bibliography
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling- General consideration
Phase change is a very efficient but complex thermal transport method due to its
ability to absorb high heat fluxes at low and uniform temperature.
Boiling is associated with transformation of liquid to vapor at a solid/liquid
interface due to convection heat transfer from the solid.
Agitation of fluid by vapor bubbles provides for large
convection coefficients and hence large heat fluxes at
low-to-moderate surface-to-fluid temperature differences.
Special form of Newton’s law of cooling:
q′′s = h (Ts − Tsat ) = h ∆ Te
Tsat → saturation temperature of liquid
CTCal-2019|SM 2
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Evaporation, Boiling and Condensation
Evaporation occurs at the liquid–vapor interface when
the vapor pressure is less than the saturation pressure
of the liquid at a given temperature. In evaporation
bubbles cannot form since the vapor pressure is less
than the atmospheric pressure.
CTCal-2019|SM 4
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling-Dimensional Analysis
• Boiling and condensation depends on the numbers of complete and
independent variables which include:
Difference in temperature ∆T = (Ts − Tsat )
Body force g (ρ l − ρ v )
Latent heat h fg
Surface tension σ
Characteristic length L
Thermophysical properties of fluid ρ , cp , k , µ
•As a result, the heat transfer depends on:
h = h[∆T , g (ρ l − ρ v ) , h fg , σ , L , ρ , c p , k , µ ]
Here 10 variables, 5 dimensions-m,kg,s,j,K
• pi/dimensionless-group:10-5=5 CTCal-2019|SM 5
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling-Dimensional Analysis
• Applying Buckingham pi theorem in previous functions one obtains:
πl = f(π2, π3 , π4, π5)
hL ρg (ρ l − ρ v )L3 c p ∆T µc p g (ρ l − ρ v )L2
= f , , ,
k µ 2
h fg k σ
ρg (ρ l − ρ v )L3
Nu L = f , Ja , Pr , Bo
µ2
Nusselt number (characterizes convection heat transfer)
µ2
c p ∆T
Jakob number (ratio of sensible energy to latent energy) Ja =
h fg
g (ρ l − ρ v )L2
Bond number (ratio of gravitational body force to surface Bo =
tension force) σ
CTCal-2019|SM 6
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling Regimes and Curve
The boiling curve reveals different boiling regimes/forms and range of conditions
associated the pool boiling on a heat flux Vs excess temperature ( q′′s − ∆ Te ) plot.
Jets and
columns
• Nucleate boiling(A-B-C)
• Transition boiling(C-D)
CTCal-2019|SM 10
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling Regimes
CTCal-2019|SM 11
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Boiling- Burnout
• Potential Burnout for Power-Controlled Heating
An increase in q′′s beyond qmax
′′ causes the surface to be blanketed by vapor
and its temperature to spontaneously achieve a value that can exceed its
melting point ( ∆ Te > 1000o C ).
• A typical boiling process does not
follow the boiling curve beyond point C.
• When the power applied to the heated
surface exceeded the value at point C even
slightly, the surface temperature increased
suddenly to point E.
• When the power is reduced gradually
starting from point E the cooling curve
follows with a sudden drop in excess
temperature until D is reached.
A reduction in q ′′s below q m′′ in causes an
abrupt reduction in surface temperature to
the nucleate boiling regime.
CTCal-2019|SM 12
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Bubbles (Nucleation-dynamics)
Bubble Coalescence
-Horizontal coalescence due the presence of multiple nucleation sites.
-Vertical coalescence at high rates of bubble release.
CTCal-2019|SM 13
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling Correlations
• Boiling regimes differ considerably in their character and mechanism
• Different heat transfer relations need to be used for different boiling regimes.
Natural convection
•Heat transfer rates can be accurately determined using natural convection
relations.
= Where, n= ¼ for laminar and 1/3 for turbulent
CTCal-2019|SM 14
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling Correlations
• Nucleate boiling
No general theoretical relations for heat transfer in the nucleate boiling
regime is available.
Experimental based correlations are used.
The rate of heat transfer strongly depends on the nature of nucleation and
the type and the condition of the heated surface.
”
= ∆
Nucleation site density
(active nucleation per unit
area), = (∆ , )
CTCal-2019|SM 15
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling Correlations
In region, A-B, the boiling phenomena is type of liquid phase forced convection where
fluid motion is induced by rising bubbles and a general form of such forced
convention can be: = (,)
A characteristics length scale and velocity need to be identified for nucleate boiling.
As the rising bubbles mix the liquid, the length scale: bubble diameter, Db and it can be
obtained from force balance buoyancy force (∝ ! ) and surface tension force (∝ ! )
(" ∝ #! ) =>
! ∝ + #*$(% − % ) (,,)
& (
A characteristic velocity, V for the agitation of the liquid may be obtained from the
distance and time (tb) the liquid travels to fill in behind a departing bubble (∝ ! ).
(,II)
Jacob number, Ja
• The values in Rohsenow equation can be used for any geometry.
• The correlation is applicable to clean and relatively smooth surfaces.
CTCal-2019|SM 17
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling Correlations
Critical Heat Flux (CHF):
The CHF in nucleate pool boiling was determined theoretically by Kutateladze
(Russia) in 1948 and Zuber (USA) in 1958 and has the form:
(Geometry constant)
CTCal-2019|SM 18
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling Correlations
Film boiling: Based on film condensation analogy and for film boiling on a
cylinder/sphere of diameter (D), Bromley developed a model for Nu as:
h conv D
g ( ρ − ρ ) h′ D 3 1/ 4
Geometry C
Nu D = =C l v fg
Cylinder(Hor.) 0.62
kv ν v kv (Ts − Tsat ) Sphere 0.67
Corrected latent heat, h´fg accounts Esen to maintain Tv.blanket >Tsat and have:
h′fg = h fg + 0.80 c p , v (Ts − Tsat )
When Ts >300°C, radiation became significant and he cumulative (and coupled
effects) of convection and radiation across the vapor layer (Bromley,1950):
h 4 / 3 ≈ hconv + h rad h 1/ 3
4/3
(Outer surface of
horizontal tube but works
for vertical surface too)
If hconv > h rad ,
For
Where:
- is the Stefan–Boltzman constant and the temperature in this case
must be expressed in K, not °C. Emissivity of solid from Table
A.11.
CTCal-2019|SM 20
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling- Parametric effects
Influence of the gravitational field
The dependence of the critical heat flux, minimum heat flux, and average
Nusselt number for film boiling on g1/4 is correct even for values of g as low as
0.1 m/s2
However, for nucleate boiling, the heat flux is nearly independent of gravity,
while Rosenhow correlation predicts that it is proporcional to g1/2
Influence of liquid subcooling
In natural convection, the heat flux increases as (Ts-Tl)5/4=(∆Te+∆Tsub)5/4
In the nucleate boiling regime, the influence of subcooling on the heat flux is
negligible
The critical and the minimum heat flux increase linearly with ∆Tsub
In the film boiling regime, the heat flux increases significantly with ∆Tsub
Influence of surface roughness
The influence of roughness on the maximum and miminum heat fluxes and on
film boiling is negligible
Increased surface roughness can cause a large increase in heat flux for the
nucleate boiling regime.
CTCal-2019|SM 21
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling- Heat Transfer Enhancement
The rate of heat transfer in the nucleate boiling regime strongly depends
on the number of active nucleation sites on the surface, and the rate of
bubble formation at each site and also to the properties of liquid.
Modification that enhances nucleation on the heating surface will also enhance
heat transfer in nucleate boiling such as Irregularities on the heating surface,
including roughness and dirt, serve as additional nucleation sites during boiling.
Customized heater surface- porous, cavities, grooving, particle deposition and
sand blasting etc.
Modifing liquids adding surfactant (selective) as well as dispersed small
(micro/nano) scale particles can also increase the nucleate boiling (e.g.,
Murshed et al., 2009).
CTCal-2019|SM 23
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Forced Convection (Flow) Boiling
Internal forced convection (internal flow) boiling/Two-phase flow
-Assosicated with bubble formation and dynamics inside the heated duct/tube
-A typical forced convection boiling in a vertical tube subject to uniform heat flux has:
ρ u (r , x ) X dAc
A X: mass fraction of vapour in the fluid
X= c
m&
In the saturated flow boiling region in smooth circular tubes the following
correlation may be used (Kandlikar correlations (1990&1999):
) 0 .1 0.7
ρ ′
′
= 0.6683 l X 0.16 (1 − X ) f (Fr ) + 1058 (1 − X ) Gs , f
h 0.64 q s 0 .8
hsp ρv m& ′′ h fg
or
0.45 0.7
ρ q′s′
X 0.72 (1 − X ) f (Fr ) + 667.2 (1 − X )0.8 Gs, f
h 0.08
= 1.136 l
hsp ρv m& ′′ h fg
m& ′′ = m& Ac 0 < X ≤ 0.8
(In utilizing any of this Eq., larger value of h should be used; these Eqs are
valid for both horizontal and verticle tube; properties evaluated at Tsat)
CTCal-2019|SM 26
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Forced Convection (Flow) Boiling
Internal forced convection (flow) boiling
hsp is the single phase (liquid) convective coefficient and can be determined from
Gnielinski Nu correlation for tube: 0.5≤ Pr ≤ 2000 and
3000 ≤ ReD ≤ 5x106
1
f (Fr ) =
for vertical tubes and for horizontal tubes with Fr ≥0.04
Stratification parameter: 0.3
2.63 Fr for horizontal tubes with Fr ≤0.04
q′s′ π D x
• The mean vapour mass fraction is related to the heat flux by X (x ) =
(x is the axial coordinate with x=0 where X begins to exceed zero) m& h fg
CTCal-2019|SM 27
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Forced Convection (Flow) Boiling
CTCal-2019|SM 28
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Forced Convection (Flow) Boiling
External forced convection boiling
In the nucleate (partial) flow boiling regime, without
excessive vapour formation and subcooled liquid, the
heat flux (/ ” ) can be estimated from Bergles and
Rohsenow (1964) interpolation relation:
”
/0.1.
/2”
”
/0.1. -heat flux for single-phase forced convection
/2” - heat flux for FD boiling correlation at various Tw
”
/24 - FD boiling inception heat flux at Tw@ONB
”
Procedure: /24
- Select Tw
”
- Estimate /2” and /0.1. = ℎ(67 − 6789 )
”
- Determine /24 from FD boiling equation at Tw@ONB
CTCal-2019|SM 29
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Forced Convection (Flow) Boiling
External forced convection (flow) boiling
Forced convection boiling for a liquid cross flow
over a cylinder of diameter D:
(Lienhard and Eichhorn 1976)
′′
qmax 1 4
1 3
′′
qmax
12
0.275 ρl
= 1+ if > +1 (low velocity)
ρv h fg V π WeD ρv h fg V π ρv
12
′′
qmax
=
( ρl ρv )
34
+
(ρl ρv )
12
if
′′
qmax
<
0.275 ρl
+1 (high velocity)
ρv h fg V 169π 13
19.2π WeD ρv h fg V π ρv
Properties are @Tsat
• WeD: Weber number – ratio of inertia to surface tension forces
ρv V 2 D <<
These Equations correlate /:8; within 20%
WeD =
σ
CTCal-2019|SM 30
ADVANCED HEAT TRANSFER
Part Ia: Pool Boiling of Nanofluids
Nucleate pool boiling of nanofluids
Nanofluids are a new class of fluids which is
defined as the suspesnions of nano-sized
solid particles in conventional fluids.
Nanofluids showed significantly increased
critical heat flux (CHF) in pool boiling.
For instance, CHF of SWCNT/water based
nanofluids at very low concentration (0.1 vol.%)
with added surfactant was found to have about
6 times larger than that of pure water (Murshed
et al.,2009)