Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
RESUMEN
[...] the beams are designed as single span beams with hinge supports. At present there are no guidelines available
in Indian Codes for composite columns. [...] the procedure given in [4] is adopted.
TEXTO COMPLETO
Public buildings requiring large floor area can be economically constructed adopting steel framework of columns,
girders and flooring of reinforced concrete. The recently published steel code (IS:800-2007) includes Load and
Resistance Factor methods of design adopted from the latest foreign codes. The outdated clauses for design of
composite beams and columns are now removed from IS:800-2007. It is expected that new versions of composite
construction, based on European codes will be published soon by the Bureau of Indian Standards.
This paper presents various alternatives for design of Steel- Concrete Framed Buildings and examines the
economy of each arrangement. Comparison is made between two types of steel construction (traditional and
limited continuity type) as well as economy and constructional advantage achieved by composite construction.
The new Indian steel code as well as the latest European codes are used.
A four storey industrial frame of 18mx36m plan area is designed using five alternate approaches. Each of the five
alternative designs is done by Allowable Stress Design (ASD) as well as Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
and results compared.
Dr. P. Suryanarayana,
Professor, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal,
Introduction
Public buildings requiring large floor area can be economically constructed by adopting steel frame work of
columns, girders and flooring of reinforced concrete slabs. The traditional design of steelconcrete buildings has
the following features. (Figure 1) The floor system consists of a slab supported by a grid work of beams. The
beams frame into columns in such a way that the centre lines of beams in longitudinal and transverse directions
intersect at the column centre. The beam column joints are assumed to be pinned. Hence the beams are designed
as single span beams with hinge supports.
An alternate arrangement wherein the secondary beams are continuous over the primary beams and the primary
beams are continuous over column brackets is suggested by British designers. In this arrangement, the centre
lines of primary beam, secondary beam and column do not intersect at a common point. [5*]
A comparison of traditional and alternate designs is made by designing a building panel of 18m x 36m for a four
storey building by both the approaches. Calculations for each design are done both by Allowable Stress Design
(ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). The designs are based on elastic and plastic analysis,
lateral stability calculations and deflection checks [1,2,3,4]. The building frame consists of 6.0m x 9.0m slab
panels. Columns are 4.0m high per storey.
The five design alternatives are as follows:
DETALLES
Título de publicación: NBM &CW: New Building Materials &Construction World; New Delhi
ISSN: 09730591
Copyright de la base de datos 2019 ProQuest LLC. Reservados todos los derechos.