Você está na página 1de 12

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

age 200 100.0% 0 0.0% 200 100.0%

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

age Mean 46.04 .765

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 44.53


Mean Upper Bound 47.54

5% Trimmed Mean 46.20

Median 47.00

Variance 116.949

Std. Deviation 10.814

Minimum 20

Maximum 69

Range 49

Interquartile Range 16

Skewness -.233 .172

Kurtosis -.610 .342


age

age Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

4.00 2 . 0234
12.00 2 . 555666688999
20.00 3 . 00000002233344444444
18.00 3 . 555566666777888999
27.00 4 . 000111222222223333334444444
42.00 4 . 555555556666666677777777788888888899999999
29.00 5 . 00000011111112222233333334444
25.00 5 . 5555566667777777777888999
19.00 6 . 00001111222333344
4.00 6 . 5589

Stem width: 10
Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Frequencies

Statistics
sex

N Valid 200

Missing 0
Mean 1.62
Median 2.00
Mode 2
Std. Deviation .487
Variance .237
Skewness -.498
Std. Error of Skewness .172
Kurtosis -1.770
Std. Error of Kurtosis .342
Range 1
Minimum 1
Maximum 2
Percentiles 25 1.00

50 2.00

75 2.00

sex

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Pria 76 38.0 38.0 38.0

Wanita 124 62.0 62.0 100.0

Total 200 100.0 100.0


Graph
Explore

chd

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

chd N Percent N Percent N Percent


cholesterol Non CHD 139 100.0% 0 0.0% 139 100.0%

CHD 61 100.0% 0 0.0% 61 100.0%


cholesterol

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total


N Percent N Percent N Percent

Status Obesitas * chd 200 100.0% 0 0.0% 200 100.0%


Status Obesitas * chd Crosstabulation

chd

Non CHD CHD Total

Status Obesitas non obes Count 75 16 91

% within Status Obesitas 82.4% 17.6% 100.0%

obesitas Count 64 45 109

% within Status Obesitas 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%


Total Count 139 61 200

% within Status Obesitas 69.5% 30.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 13.144a 1 .000


Continuity Correctionb 12.049 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 13.609 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
McNemar Test .c
N of Valid Cases 200

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.76.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. Both variables must have identical values of categories.

Symmetric Measuresa

Value

Measure of Agreement Kappa .b


N of Valid Cases 200

a. Correlation statistics are available for numeric


data only.
b. Kappa statistic cannot be computed. It
requires a two-way table in which the variables
are of the same type.
Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status


Obesitas (non obes / 3.296 1.702 6.382
obesitas)
For cohort chd = Non CHD 1.404 1.168 1.687
For cohort chd = CHD .426 .259 .701
N of Valid Cases 200

Tests of Homogeneity of the Odds Ratio

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Chi-Squared df sided)

Breslow-Day .000 0 .
Tarone's .000 0 .

Tests of Conditional Independence

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Chi-Squared df sided)

Cochran's 13.144 1 .000


Mantel-Haenszel 11.989 1 .001

Under the conditional independence assumption, Cochran's statistic


is asymptotically distributed as a 1 df chi-squared distribution, only if
the number of strata is fixed, while the Mantel-Haenszel statistic is
always asymptotically distributed as a 1 df chi-squared distribution.
Note that the continuity correction is removed from the Mantel-
Haenszel statistic when the sum of the differences between the
observed and the expected is 0.
Mantel-Haenszel Common Odds Ratio Estimate

Estimate 3.296
ln(Estimate) 1.193
Standardized Error of ln(Estimate) .337
Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) .000
Asymptotic 95% Confidence Common Odds Ratio Lower Bound 1.702
Interval Upper Bound 6.382

ln(Common Odds Ratio) Lower Bound .532

Upper Bound 1.854

The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimate is asymptotically normally distributed


under the common odds ratio of 1.000 assumption. So is the natural log of the estimate.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Status Cholesterolemia *
200 100.0% 0 0.0% 200 100.0%
chd

Status Cholesterolemia * chd Crosstabulation

chd

Non CHD CHD Total

Status Cholesterolemia hyperkol Count 60 48 108

% within Status
55.6% 44.4% 100.0%
Cholesterolemia

normal Count 79 13 92

% within Status
85.9% 14.1% 100.0%
Cholesterolemia
Total Count 139 61 200

% within Status
69.5% 30.5% 100.0%
Cholesterolemia
Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 21.537a 1 .000


Continuity Correctionb 20.131 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 22.685 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
McNemar Test .c
N of Valid Cases 200

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. Both variables must have identical values of categories.

Symmetric Measuresa

Value

Measure of Agreement Kappa .b


N of Valid Cases 200

a. Correlation statistics are available for numeric


data only.
b. Kappa statistic cannot be computed. It
requires a two-way table in which the variables
are of the same type.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status


Cholesterolemia (hyperkol / .206 .102 .414
normal)
For cohort chd = Non CHD .647 .536 .781
For cohort chd = CHD 3.145 1.822 5.430
N of Valid Cases 200

Tests of Homogeneity of the Odds Ratio


Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Chi-Squared df sided)

Breslow-Day .000 0 .
Tarone's .000 0 .

Tests of Conditional Independence

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Chi-Squared df sided)

Cochran's 21.537 1 .000


Mantel-Haenszel 20.030 1 .000

Under the conditional independence assumption, Cochran's statistic


is asymptotically distributed as a 1 df chi-squared distribution, only if
the number of strata is fixed, while the Mantel-Haenszel statistic is
always asymptotically distributed as a 1 df chi-squared distribution.
Note that the continuity correction is removed from the Mantel-
Haenszel statistic when the sum of the differences between the
observed and the expected is 0.

Mantel-Haenszel Common Odds Ratio Estimate

Estimate .206
ln(Estimate) -1.581
Standardized Error of ln(Estimate) .356
Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) .000
Asymptotic 95% Confidence Common Odds Ratio Lower Bound .102
Interval Upper Bound .414

ln(Common Odds Ratio) Lower Bound -2.280

Upper Bound -.883

The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimate is asymptotically normally distributed


under the common odds ratio of 1.000 assumption. So is the natural log of the estimate.

Você também pode gostar