Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Socrates is being tried on account of two charges, one being corrupting the youth and the
other being impiety. Socrates begins his defense of the first charge by saying “He says that I am
guilty of corrupting the young, but I say that Meletus is guilty of dealing frivolously with serious
matters.” (28) Rather than focusing on providing evidence to prove his innocence, Socrates bases
In court today, Socrates’ approach would most certainly be objected to. The objection
would be relevance. Socrates asks, Meletus, “Who improves our young men?” (29) To this
question, Meletus has multiple answers including “the laws” (29) and “these jurymen” (29) but
his answers have whatsoever no relevance to the entirety of the case. The overall issue of the
case is who is corrupting the youth which has no correlation with who is improving the youth.
Although this cross examination lacked relevance to the case, Socrates was most likely
trying to discredit Meletus’ accusations by humiliating him. Furthermore, Socrates’ defense had
some reason to it. For Socrates to win the case, he had to convince five hundred jurymen. By
Socrates making Meletus look foolish, Meletus also begins to appear questionable to the jury.
Discrediting Meletus’ claims could cause the jurymen to side with Socrates. Overall, Socrates’
defense could have been stronger but not everything he presented was weak.
Meletus’ claim that all Athenians improve the youth and it is only Socrates who corrupts
them is absurd. Meletus’ claim is far too general and is clearly a false statement as it is not
possible for one person to corrupt the entire youth. In Socrates’ defense, he makes the claim look
as foolish as it actually is. Socrates asks Meletus numerous questions about who improves the
youth that lead up to Socrates asking “All the Athenians, it seems, make the young into fine good
D’Arcangelo 2
men, except me, and I alone corrupt them. Is that what you mean?” (29) By Meletus making the
mistake of bluntly agreeing with this question, he looks beyond ignorant. There is no doubt
Meletus’ ridiculous claim actually helped Socrates’ case. Socrates goes on by rhetorically asking
“Does this also apply to horses, do you think? That all men improve them and one individual
corrupts them?” (29) This comparison further emphasizes the irrationality of Meletus’ claim.
Socrates continues to nail Meletus with questions that are beyond difficult to answer.
Socrates then states “You have made it sufficiently obvious, Meletus, that you have never had
any concern for our youth; you show indifference clearly; that you have given no thought to the
subjects about which you bring me to trial.” (30) Meletus went along with Socrates’ cross
examination but could have defended himself much better by not answering all of Socrates
questions. To the jury, Socrates’ claim about Meletus being careless about the youth does in
matter of fact appear true because all of Meletus’ answers were extremely vague and he appeared
to be clueless.
asks “Do you think you are prosecuting Anaxagoras?” (31) This comparison allows Socrates to
really appeal to the jury because they are all aware of Anaxagoras’ case. Socrates continues and
asks “Is that, by Zeus, what you think of me, Meletus, that I do not believe that there are any
gods?” (31) To this question, Meletus answers yes which makes him appear even more ignorant
Meletus would have held a much stronger case if he objected to answering every one of
Socrates’ questions. Many of Socrates questions lacked any relevance whatsoever to his proving
his innocence. However, Socrates’ questions made Meletus look careless and ignorant because
Meletus was not able to provide strong answers to these questions. Rather than allowing Socrates
D’Arcangelo 2
to run the show, Meletus should have refused to answer the majority of Socrates’ questions.
Instead, Meletus allowed Socrates to ridicule him in front of the entire court.