Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
To cite this article: C.V. Nandini , S. Sanjeevi & Aparna S. Bhaskar (2013) An integrated
approach to map certain palaeochannels of South India using remote sensing, geophysics, and
sedimentological techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34:19, 6507-6528, DOI:
10.1080/01431161.2013.803629
1. Introduction
Palaeochannels are old rivers which had dried up due to various geological and climato-
logical factors in the past. Palaeochannel studies are important since such features can host
economic deposits of uranium, lignite, precious metals, high-grade silica sand, heavy min-
erals, and placer minerals. Palaeochannels are also the sites of good groundwater potential
(Parry 2006).
Paleochannels also preserve sedimentary records useful to understand the palaeocli-
matic conditions. Though studying palaeochannels is important, a precise methodology
has not been developed for mapping and identification of palaeochannels. Hence, there
is a need to develop a precise methodology for their identification and mapping. Since
palaeochannels are sometimes wide, are hundreds of kilometres long, and are covered with
natural vegetation or agricultural lands, it becomes difficult to visualize their presence in
the field. Satellite imaging offers the advantage of synoptic view along with multispectral
and multi-temporal data set to overcome these limitations and study palaeochannels. The
application of remote-sensing data to palaeochannel delineation is based on three broad
principles:
• spatial and genetic relationships between surface materials and surrounding terrains;
• physical and spectral contrast between palaeochannel fills and surrounding terrains;
and
• the nature of palaeo-river dynamics (Sinha 2006).
Although there are certain approaches for palaeochannel identification and mapping using
remote sensing, namely visual interpretation of false colour composites (FCCs) using the
standard interpretation keys, it is not possible to identify all palaeochannels. This is perhaps
due to lesser moisture content and absence of vegetation in certain palaeochannels, which
makes them difficult to identify in a FCC. To overcome these limitations and to pick out all
of the palaeochannels that exist in an area, this study aims to:
Many studies have been attempted on palaeochannel mapping, river migration, etc. It is
known that the mighty river Cauvery in south India has shifted its northeasterly course
along Hogenekkal–Chennai and later migrated southwards due to tectonic movements
or Holocene block-faulting in the Bilgirirangan hill ranges (Ramasamy et al. 1992).
Because of such a migration of Cauvery river, there is a possibility of the existence of
palaeochannels in the region. Kar (1989) identified palaeochannels of the Saraswathi and
Drishavadi river system in parts of Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan states in India and in
Pakistan using Landsat Multispectral Scanner or Thematic Mapper (MSS/TM) data and
aerial photographs. The author used the geophysical resistivity method for the validation
of the palaeochannels inferred from image analysis. In another study on the evolution
of the palaeochannel of the Leitha river, characteristic morphometric parameters such as
stream slope and palaeochannel slope were calculated using a digital elevation model by
Zámolyi et al. (2006). Hou and Mauger (2005) tried to delineate the palaeochannels in the
Harris Greenstone belt of South Australia using various remote-sensing data. Both a dig-
ital elevation model (DEM) and sedimentological analysis were used for this study. The
authors assessed the potential of DEM to help the interpretation of palaeo-drainage land-
form characteristics. Sedimentological analysis of sand samples obtained from the mapped
palaeochannels indicated transportation and depositional environments.
Based on our experience and taking a clue from the above-listed literature, an integrated
approach to palaeochannel mapping in the northeastern part of Tamilnadu state, southern
India, has been attempted and presented in this article.
2. Study area
The study area (Figure 1) is located in the northeastern part of Tamilnadu state, southern
India, extending from Muttukadu lagoon in the north to Coleroon estuary in the south.
The Bay of Bengal lies on the east of the study area. Subrahmanya (1996) suggested that
the Indian peninsula is undergoing deformation which has resulted in buckling and uplift
along a near E–W trending line. This line is located in the northern part of our study area,
parallel to the northern boundary. Because of this uplift, streams on either side of the line
International Journal of Remote Sensing 6509
KARNATAKA
R. Palar
12° 30′ 0″ N
12° 30′ 0″ N
R. Ponnayar
Kuvathur
SOUTH
INDIA R. Coleroon
L
GA
KERALA
EN
12° 0′ 0″ N
B
12° 0′ 0″ N
OF
R. Cauvery
Y
BA
Pondicherry
TAMIL NADU
Bay of Bengal
11° 30′ 0″ N
11° 30′ 0″ N
Pichavaram
5
0 100 km 0 5 10 20 30 40 km
Figure 1. Map showing (a) the location of the study area and (b) the corresponding false colour
composite, (Landsat ETM+ R = 5, G = 4, B = 3).
have been migrating in opposite directions, giving rise to palaeochannels. The major rivers
draining this area are the Palar, Ponnaiyar, Vellar, and Coleroon, which have associated
palaeochannels. The rock types encountered in the study area are principally hard rock and
sedimentary formations, which include charnockite, gneiss, granite, dolerite, pegmatite,
limestone, sandstone, and alluvium (Geological Survey of India 1995).
The geomorphology of the area can be described by the denudational, fluvial, coastal,
and aeolian landforms. These include the uplands, coastal plain, palaeochannels (exposed
and buried), lagoons, coastal dunes and slacks, strandlines, mud flats, beach, marsh, and
pediments.
3. Methodology
The methodology adopted for the study is outlined in Figure 2. It involves two compo-
nents: (1) image analysis and image interpretation and (2) validation by sedimentological
and geophysical techniques. The first step involves the identification of the study area and
collection of satellite image data such as LANDSAT Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus
(ETM+), LANDSAT TM, Radarsat, and DEM acquired by the Shuttle Radar Topographic
Mission (SRTM). The characteristics of these image data are listed in Table 1. The raw
satellite images contain a variety of errors in their geometry and radiometry. These errors
were reduced and digital processing techniques (enhancement), DEM analysis (shaded
relief, spatial profiling), and multi-sensor image fusion techniques (Brovey, principal com-
ponent analysis, and intensity–hue–saturation method) were applied for the delineation of
palaeochannels.
Synoptivity, combined with specific image characters of the palaeochannels in the
enhanced images, fused images, and the shaded relief image has helped in identifying
most of the palaeochannels in the study area. The image signatures of palaeochannels
which aided in interpreting them are (1) sinusoidal pattern, (2) associated water bodies,
6510 C.V. Nandini et al.
Interpretation
Palaeochannel map
Validation
and (3) high reflectance in the near-infrared (NIR) band due to abundant vegetation in cer-
tain palaeochannels. Since ground truth surveys and validation are necessary, they were
also carried out in the form of field visits, sedimentology, and electrical resistivity surveys.
The results of such analyses, and the significance of an integrated approach is discussed in
Section 4. The list of satellite images used is given in Table 1.
mapping, linear contrast stretching, and histogram equalization were the primarily used
enhancement operations.
In contrast stretching, we usually follow the process of reassigning the range of pixel
values to another range, usually according to a linear function. This is performed on each
pixel of the image on a multi-band basis (also see Lillesand and Kiefer 2000). The products
of such contrast enhancement and their significance in palaeochannel mapping is discussed
in Section 4.
images with a higher degree of contrast in the low and high ends of the image histogram
and for producing visually appealing images (Pohl 1996).
Each of these (PCA, IHS, and Brovey) methods was used in this study. After evaluation,
the fused images with maximum information on palaeochannel was used for mapping.
• usually vegetated regions (even during summer) with high reflectance in the NIR
band;
• low values in the IR bands wherever moisture was present;
• a sinusoidal pattern;
• associated water bodies, varying in size and distribution;
• well-defined connectivity with an existing river channel;
• a shape like a drainage channel;
• a region normally associated with fluvial landforms;
• associated with lineaments; and
• absence of drainage lines on topographical map.
6514 C.V. Nandini et al.
The palaeochannels in the map were prepared from various images by applying the above-
mentioned image-processing techniques and validated using a sedimentological approach,
electrical resistivity surveys, and by spatial profiling of the DEM.
Frequently, rocks, which are not good conductors by themselves, contain moisture in
the pore spaces, when the resistivity decreases considerably. But this change is not of the
same order in all formations. In igneous rock, which is hard and dense, even if the mois-
ture content is less than 2% by volume, the resistivity may come down by several orders.
On the other hand, porous formations like sand or sandstone exhibit a steady decrease in
the resistivity as the moisture content increases (Chennakesavulu 1993).
In this study, a Wenner array is used to decipher the existence of palaeochannels and
to know the stratification and thickness of the lithounits (sand body). In this configuration,
the outer electrodes, C1 and C2, are used to send current into the ground and the inner
electrodes, P1 and P2, are used to measure the potential. The important feature of this
set-up is that the distance between any two successive electrodes is equal. The apparent
resistivity (ρ a ) is measured with the Wenner array and is given by:
where a is the electrode separation, v is the potential difference measured, and I is the cur-
rent sent into the ground (Chennakesavulu 1993). We conducted a series of four-electrode
experiments, with both the potential electrodes centred between the current electrodes.
Initially, the current electrodes were placed close together and the current and voltage
were measured, from which the apparent resistivity was computed. Then we repeated the
experiment by systematically increasing the current-electrode and potential-electrode spac-
ing. The resistivity values were obtained for three points in each channel, i.e. the centre
of the palaeochannel, the northern flank, and southern flank (see Figures 9 and 10). The
observations and results of the resistivity surveys are discussed in Section 5.2.
(a) (b)
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
Figure 3. Image enhancement (a) histogram equalization stretching and (b) equalization stretching.
palaeochannels) and light (dry and barren) areas of the image is improved, while maintain-
ing the relative distribution of grey levels (Mather 1987). ERDAS Field Guide (1999), gives
a detailed explanation of contrast stretching and its significance. When applied in the multi-
band domain, contrast stretching results in clear differentiation between the palaeochannels
and the adjacent areas. Figure 6 shows the palaeochannels that have been extracted from
one such contrast-stretched image.
5. Validation
Validation of the existence of palaeochannels identified from the various satellite images
and DEM is done by
• sedimentological analysis;
• electrical resistivity survey; and
• spatial profiling.
International Journal of Remote Sensing 6519
(a)
Uplands
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
(b)
Uplands
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
(c)
Uplands
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
Figure 4. (a) ETM + PAN and multispectral image fused using the PCA method; (b) ETM +
multispectral and Radarsat image fused using the HIS method; and (c) ETM + multispectral,
Radarsat, thermal, and PAN image fused using the Brovey method.
6520 C.V. Nandini et al.
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
Bay of Bengal
Figure 5. (a) DEM (SRTM resampled) of study area, (b) hill shade image obtained with sun
elevation 45◦ and sun azimuth 60◦ , and (c) hill shade with sun elevation 45◦ and sun azimuth 10◦ .
Note: The present-day river channel and the palaeochannels with an E–W flow are enhanced in (b)
while palaeochannels with NE–SW flow are enhanced in (a).
C5
15
C2
12° 30′ 0″ N
12° 30′ 0″ N 14
C12
C4 2 4 6 8
Uplands Distance along profile (m)
C3
20 (ii)
Bay of Bengal
Elevation (m)
19
18
(i) C1
12° 0′ 0″ N
C7 12° 0′ 0″ N 17
16
C8 S1
(ii) 15
Legend 2 4 6 8 10
Distance along profile (m)
C9 Present channels
Palaeochannels
Vaanch (iii)
S2 Coastal plain 16
C10 Resistivity survey
Core samples C1 to C12
15
Elevation (m)
Spatial profile
11° 30′ 0″ N
11° 30′ 0″ N
14
(iii)
C11 13
0 5 10 20 30 40
km 1 2 3 4 5 6
79° 0′ 0″ E 79° 30′ 0″ E 80° 0′ 0″ E
Distance along profile (m)
Figure 6. (a) Palaeochannel map prepared by analysing satellite data (image and DEM) and (b) (i),
(ii), (iii) spatial profiles from DEM across certain inferred palaeochannels as in (a). Note: Vaanch is
a local term to denote freshwater ponds that occur near the coast.
6522 C.V. Nandini et al.
3.0 3.0 3.0
C1 C2 C3
2.6 2.6 2.6
2 3
2.2 5 2.2 2.2
4 2
3 2
1
1.8 1.8 1 1.8
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Miola and Weiser (1968) Miola and Weiser (1968) Miola and Weiser (1968)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4
Standard deviation Standard deviation Standard deviation
4 4 4
3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961)
2 2 2
1 1 4 1 4 32 1
3 5 2
Skewness
Skewness
Skewness
0 2 0 1 0 1 3
–1 –1 Beach sand –1 Beach sand 4
Beach sand River sand River sand
River sand
–2 –2 –2
–3 –3 –3
–4 –4 –4
–5 –5 –5
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Standard deviation Standard deviation Standard deviation
3.0 3.0 3.0
C4 C5 C6
2.6 2.6 2.6
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Miola and 3
Miola and Weiser (1968) Miola and Weiser (1968) Weiser (1968) 4
5
2
1.4 1.4
1.4 1
Coastal dune Coastal dune
Coastal dune 1.0 River 2 1.0 River
1.0 River
4 3
River River
River Beach Beach
Beach 0.6
0.6
0.6
0.2 0.2
0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4
Standard deviation Standard Deviation
Standard deviation
4 4 4
3 Friedman (1961) 3 3
Friedman (1961) Friedman (1961)
2 2 2
1 1 1
Skewness
Skewness
Skewness
0 0 0
Beach sand River sand Beach sand River sand –1 Beach sand River sand
–1 –1
–2 –2
–2
–3 –3
–3
–4 –4
–4
–5 –5
–5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Standard deviation
Standard deviation
Standard deviation
Figure 7. Miola and Weiser plots (standard deviation vs. graphic mean) and the corresponding
Friedman curve (standard deviation vs. skewness) for core samples 1–6.
individual grains of the sediment samples are rounded in nature. Hence, we may infer that
the locations where the core samples were collected are certainly along palaeochannels.
C7 C8 C9
2.6 2.6
2.6
2.2 2.2
2.2
1.8 1.8
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Miola and Weiser (1968) Miola and Weiser (1968) 1.8 Miola and Weiser (1968)
1.4 13 1.4
2 1.4
6
Coastal dune 4 5 Coastal dune Coastal dune
1.0 River 1.0 River River
1.0
River River River
Beach Beach Beach
0.6 0.6
0.6
0.2 0.2
0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4
Standard deviation Standard deviation Standard deviation
4 4 4
3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961)
2 1 2 1 2 1
2 2 4 2
5 4 4
1 3 1 5 3 1 3
Skewness
Skewness
Skewness
0 5
0 River sand 0
Beach sand Beach sand River sand Beach sand 6 River sand
–1 –1 –1
–2 –2 –2
–3 –3 –3
–4 –4 –4
–5 –5 –5
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Standard deviation
Standard deviation Standard deviation
2.2 2.2
2.2
1.8 1.8
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Graphic mean
Miola and Weiser (1968) Miola and Weiser (1968) 1.8 Miola and Weiser (1968)
1.4 1.4
1.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4
Standard deviation Standard deviation Standard deviation
4 4 4
3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961) 3 Friedman (1961)
2 2 2
1 1 1
Skewness
Skewness
Skewness
0 0 0
–1 Beach sand River sand –1 Beach sand River sand
–1 Beach sand River sand
–2 –2 –2
–3 –3
–3
–4 –4
–4
–5 –5
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 –5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Standard deviation Standard deviation Standard deviation
Figure 8. Miola and Weiser plots (standard deviation vs. graphic mean) and the corresponding
Friedman curve (standard deviation vs. skewness) for core samples 7–12.
1000
0.1
0.1
100
(a) (b)
Apparent resistivity (Ωm)
1
1
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
100
10
10
10
100
100
10
1
Electrode spacing (m) Resistivity (Ωm) Electrode spacing (m) Resistivity (Ωm)
1 10 100 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1 10 100 1000
1000
0.1
(c)
100
Depth (m)
10
10
100
1
Figure 9. (a) Resistivity curve at location 1, (b) resistivity curve at location 2, and (c) resistivity
curve at location 3. The numbers 1, 2 and 3 are the locations respectively on the two banks and in the
centre of the palaeochannel.
river because it disappears before it reaches Rajapalayam. It is believed that this river flows
beneath the ground after Rajapalayam. Here also, resistivity surveys were conducted at
three locations: one in the centre and the other two in the northern and southern sides of
the river. This terrain is different from site 1 in terms of land use, moisture content, etc.
Figure 10 and Table 5 represent the information about the vertical strata and thickness of
the three locations at site 2.
International Journal of Remote Sensing 6525
104
0.1
0.1
1000
(a) (b)
1000
Apparent resistivity (Ωm)
1
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
10
100
10
10
100
100
10
1
Electrode spacing (m) Resistivity (Ωm) Electrode spacing (m) Resistivity (Ωm)
1 10 100 0.1 1 10 100 1 10 100 1 10 100103104 105
100
0.1
(c)
Apparent resistivity (Ωm)
1
Depth (m)
10
10
100
1
Figure 10. (a) Resistivity curve at location 1, (b) resistivity curve at location 2, and (c) resistivity
curve at location 3. The numbers 1, 2 and 3 are the locations respectively on the two banks and in the
centre of the palaeochannel.
The apparent resistivity values measured during the survey are plotted as a resistivity
curve and the varying thickness of each strata is determined. The thick horizon of alluvial
strata indicates the presence of a palaeochannel. Thus, electrical resistivity surveys at two
sites (six locations) have proved the existence of palaeochannels that were delineated from
enhanced and fused images and by the hill-shade analysis and spatial profile of SRTM
DEM.
6526 C.V. Nandini et al.
Figure 11. Exposed palaeochannel (not listed in a topographic map as a stream) seen with water
logging.
6. Conclusions
This study has demonstrated the potential of remote sensing as a tool for palaeochannel
mapping in the context of a natural resource survey. This study has also helped us to
have a better understanding of field and image characters of palaeochannels. Various image
enhancement techniques have been applied to the various multi-sensor image data sets. The
use of field survey, sedimentological analysis, and electrical resistivity survey as potential
tools for validating the findings of remote sensing has also been demonstrated. Analysis of
the results of such enhancements has shown that:
International Journal of Remote Sensing 6527
• simple linear enhancement and contrast stretching of optical image data results in
better visualization of palaeochannels;
• fusion of optical and microwave images using the Brovey transform approach resulted
in images of the study area which were very visually appealing and contained a host
of information about the palaeochannels that exists in the study area;
• the hill-shading technique applied to the SRTM DEM was useful, especially for
identifying the exposed palaeochannels, with a gently undulating surface expression
across the valley;
• since most of the palaeochannels in the study area have west–east and east–
southeast flows, the hill-shading technique with a 45◦ north–east azimuth and 10◦
to 15◦ elevation angle as input has resulted in very good visualization of such
palaeochannels;
• a combination of linear contrast enhancement, image fusion, and DEM analysis
resulted in identification of 25 palaeochannels, which is 20 more than that reported
in the literature about the study area;
• sedimentological analysis of 12 bore hole samples taken from the predicted
palaeochannels reveals that the sediments are of fluvial origin, thereby confirming
the accuracy of the palaeochannel map;
• at six locations, electrical resistivity surveys have further strengthened the findings
about the existence of the palaeochannels; and
• the potential of optical, microwave, and thermal image data in identifying and
mapping the palaeochannels is proved.
Acknowledgements
The Global Land Cover Facility at University of Maryland USA, is thanked for the satellite images.
References
Chennakesavulu, N. 1993. Text Book of Engineering Geology, 340–344. New Delhi: Macmillan India
Ltd.
Dan, G. B., T. Neta, N. Margali, M. Lazar, and M. Freilikher. 2004. “Mapping Exposed and Buried
Drainage Systems Using Remote Sensing in the Negev Desert, Israel.” Geomorphology 61:
239–250.
Dobrin, M. B. 1976. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 580–581. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ERDAS. 1999. ERDAS Field Guide. 5th ed. Revised and Expanded, 381–382. Atlanta, GA: ERDAS.
Friedman, G. M. 1961. “Distinction between Dune and River Sands from their Textural
Characteristics.” Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 31: 514–529.
Geological Survey of India. 1995. Geological and Mineral map of Tamilnadu and Pondicherry.
Kolkata: Geological Survey of India Publication.
Hou, B., and A. J. Mauger. 2005. “How Well does Remote Sensing Aid Palaeochannel Identification?
An Example from the Harris Greenstone Belt.” SA, MESA Journal, 38: 46–52.
Justine, K. 2001. “The Hydrology, Geomorphology and Quaternary Palaeochannels of the Lachlan
Valley, New South Wales.” Published thesis, Australian National University.
Kar, A. 1989. “Terrain Characteristic of Jaisalmer District.” Geographical Review of India 55: 48–59.
Keeratikasikorn, C., and I. Trisirisatayawong. 2008. “Reconstruction of 30m DEM from 90m
SRTM DEM with Bicubic Polynomial Interpolation Method.” The International Archives of the
Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXVII: Part B1.
Lawrie, K. C., R. A. Chan, D. L. Gibson, and N. S. Kovacs. 1999. “Alluvial Gold Potential in Buried
Palaeochannels in the Wyalong District, Lachlan Fold Belt, New South Wales.” AGSO Research
Newsletter 30: 1–5.
Li, Z., Q. Zhu, and C. Gold. 2005. Digital Terrain Modeling Principles and Methodology, 250–252.
New York: CRC Press.
6528 C.V. Nandini et al.
Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer. 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 543. New York:
John Wiley & Sons.
Mather, P. M. 1987. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction, 44–50. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
Miola, R. J., and D. Weiser. 1968. “Textural Parameters: An Evaluation.” Journal of Sedimentary
Petrology 38: 45–53.
NASA. 2005. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission - The Mission to Map the World. Jet Propulsion
Laboratory. Accessed January 15, 2010. www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm.
Parry, K. A. 2006. “Groundwater Studies with Spatial Reference to Palaeochannels in Sangrur and
Adjoining Areas, Punjab State.” PhD diss., Centre for Advanced Studies in Geology, Punjab
University, Chandigarh.
Pohl, C. 1996. “Geometric Aspects of Multi-Sensor Image Fusion for Topographic Map Updating in
the Humid Tropics.” PhD diss., International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences.
Rajawat, A. S., P. K. Verma, and S. Nayak. 2003. “Reconstruction of Palaeochannel Network in
Northwest India: Retrospect and Prospects of Remote Sensing Based Studies.” Proceedings of
Indian National Science Academy 69: 217–230.
Ramasamy, S. M., V. Subramanian, S. Abdullah, and S. Balaji. 1992. “The Phenomenon of
River Migration in Northern Tamilnadu-Evidence from Satellite Data, Archaeology and Tamil
Literature.” Man and Environment 18: 13–25.
Rao, M. B. R. 1975. Outlines of Geophysical Prospecting-A Manual of Geologists, 25–53. Mysore:
Mysore University Publication.
Sinha, A. K. 2006. “Palaeochannels as Ground Water Storage-A Promising Option to Cope Up
with Emergency Situations in Rajasthan, Western India.” In Proceedings of the International
Workshop on Groundwater for Emergency Situations, Tehran, October 29–31, 101–114. Paris:
UNESCO.
Subrahmanya, K. R. 1996. “Active Intraplate Deformation in South India.” Tectonophysics 262:
231–241.
Zámolyi, A., E. Draganits, M. Doneus, K. Decker, and M. Fera. 2006. “Paleochannel Evolution of
the Leitha River (Eastern Austria) – A Bird’s Eye View.” Geophysical Research Abstracts 8:
EGU2006–08976.
Zhang, Y. 2002. “Problems in the Fusion of Commercial High-Resolution Satellite Images As Well
As Landsat 7 Images and Initial Solution.” In Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications,
Ottawa, July, Vol. 34, Part 4. Archieves of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (IAPRS).