Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A. The importance of APAR is in the interest of service and also of the officer. His
work, conduct, character and capabilities can be accurately judged from the
recorded opinion.
2.What are the two principal objectives of the system of APAR writing?
3.What is the basic condition of the reporting officer for writing the APAR of his
subordinate?
A. The Reporting officer has at least 3 months experience of having supervise the
work on which he can base his report on the officer reported upon.
4.Can the Reporting Officer give the report of his subordinate without self
appraisal?
5.What would be the grave effect of negligence on the part of the Reporting
officer?
A. Slightest default or negligence on the part of Reporting Officer may lead to
grave injustice to the officer reported upon by marring his future.
A. A three tier system of reporting has been provided to minimise the operation
of subjective human element and conscious/unconscious bias in reporting.
8.Can Accepting Officer record his comments regarding the work and conduct of
an officer reported upon?
A. No. There is no provision for any authority other than the Reporting officer
and the Reviewing Officer for recording his remarks on the work and conduct of
an officer.
12.What is the time limit for taking decision on representation against adverse
remarks?
A. Within 1 month from the date of submission of representation.
13.What is the time limit for appeal against rejection of representation for
adverse remarks?
14.Shri ‘X’ a Sr Auditor worked under AAO ‘Y’ for the period from 1.4.07 to
31.7.07. Shri ‘X’ was on EL for 40 days from 1.6.07 to 10.7.07. Shri Y is
transferred out to other office from 4.9.07. Whether Shri ‘Y’ AAO can write the
APAR of Shri ‘X’, Sr. Auditor?
A. No. For computing period of 3 months leave availed more than 15 days is to be
deducted.
15.Can Reviewing Officer review the ACRs after retirement? What is the course of
action when a Reviewing Officer retires and new Reviewing Officer does not have
3 months experience of the work of the officer reported upon?
A. Yes. Reviewing Officer can review the report within one month of his
retirement. If reviewing officer is not having three months experience of the
work of the officer reported upon, reviewing portion will be left blank with
suitable note. This note will be recorded by new reviewing officer.
16.What is the course of action when no Reporting Officer is having the requisite
experience of 3 months or more during the period of Report?
A. In such a case Revewing Officer himself should initiate the report as Reporting
Officer and the same will be reviewed by the next higher authority.
A. To be got written /reviewed within two months from the date of his having
been placed under suspension or within one month from the date on which the
report was due. If for major portion of the report he is under suspension he
should not be allowed to write/review the report of his subordinate.
18.Whether Reporting Officer can write the APAR of his near relative?
A. As far as possible near relative should not be posted under him for longer
period. If in-escapable the APAR would be written by Reviewing Officer.
19.Can the Reporting Officer write the APAR of his subordinate after retirement?
20.Shri ‘X’ Senior Auditor was issued charge sheet in the month of August 2005.
He was awarded punishment in the month of May 2006. In which annual APAR
the entry relating to penalty will be recorded?
A. An entry will be recorded in the APAR of the year in which penalty is awarded
i.e. 2006-07.
21.Reporting officer ‘X’ was suspicious about the ‘Integrity’ of the reportee
employee while writing APAR for the period from 1.4.05 to 31.3.06 on 15.4.06.
Inquiry was initiated and on receipt of Inquiry Report the employee was found
guilty and punishment was issued on 15.10.06. How integrity column for the
APAR of 2005-06 will be completed?
A. Integrity column for the APAR of 2005-06 will be left blank, a secret note will
be attached.
22.Sr. Auditor ‘X’ was awarded punishment on 10.4.08 for the misconduct
committed on 15.12.06. In which APAR the act will be reflected?
23.What is the time limit for taking a decision by the competent authority on the
representation made by the reportee against adverse remarks in APAR?
A. one month.
24.Shri ‘X’ an AAO was denied promotion to the post of AO on the grounds that
there were adverse entries in his APAR which were not communicated to him.
Please comment.
26.Whether Reporting Officer can write the remark as ‘Not Applicable’ against
Integrity column?
27.Reviewing officer has recorded the remark as ‘Over pitched Report’. Whether
it can be treated as adverse remarks?
A. No, unless reviewing officer makes specific mention that it should be treated
as adverse remarks.
28.Reporting Officer graded the senior auditor ‘X’ as outstanding. The reviewing
officer also endorse it. But the accepting officer while recording his agreement
with the assessment of reporting and reviewing officer graded the sr. auditor ‘x’
as very good. Comment on the remarks of Accepting Officer?
A. (a) It provides the basic and critical inputs for assessing the performance of an
officer/staff member for further advancement of his career.
(b) The officers/staff members career is either made or marred on the basis of
his APAR.