Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#885
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Friday, April 05, 2019 5:36:54 PM
Last Modified: Friday, April 05, 2019 6:26:03 PM
Time Spent: 00:49:08
IP Address: 24.253.144.44

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Joanne Van Zyl

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-

6

Q3 Grade Taught First Grade

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

3/11/2019

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

05/03/2019

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Thurgood Marshall Elementary

Q7 School Division Chesapeake Public Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Anne Mannarino

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: amannarino@regent.edu

1/5
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Mid-Term

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Exemplary

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Superior
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Superior
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Exemplary

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Joanne knows her subject matter and content. She uses her knowledge and skills to incorporate real world examples in her teaching.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Exemplary

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Superior
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Joanne writes detailed lesson plans that incorporate the local and state standards. Her plans contain all the major component parts and
address differentiation of instruction, pacing, and timing.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/5
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Exemplary

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Proficient
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Exemplary
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Exemplary
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Exemplary

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Joanne is a very energetic student teacher, who makes learning interactive for the students. During the observation, she used a variety
of strategies and tools: such as T charts, graphic organizers, discussion groups, shoulder partners, process logs, and whole group
instruction. She incorporated technology throughout the lesson by using the video, document camera, and SMART board. Joanne
blended these teaching tools and strategies seamlessly into her instructional delivery and students were fully engaged.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Developing

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Proficient
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Proficient
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Superior

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Standard 4: Joanne is getting used to this new set of students and beginning to collect data for analysis. At this point, I have seen no
evidence of Joanne using student data, but she is developing this in this area. During my visit, Joanne did provide constant constructive
feedback to students as they worked in their small groups sounding out vowel sounds.

Standard 3: Addendum (Please disregard the previous comments for Standard 3- below is the amended version)

Joanne taught small group instruction during the observation. She kept the students engaged throughout by asking them probing
questions and prompts. She was patient, understanding, and made sure the students were reaching their goals. She differentiated
instruction as she spent time with individual students focusing on improving areas where they had gaps in instruction. She used
technology throughout the lesson as she monitored their responses through an app.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

3/5
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Superior
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Exemplary
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Exemplary
responses.

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Joanne was in control of the small groups she was teaching. She used voice control, direct reinforcement of positive behaviors, and
continuously talked to students about her expectations. She used a behavioral app to monitor classroom management throughout the
lesson. Joanne was very respectful of the students and coaxed an uncooperative student back to the learning mode by assessing his
needs.

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Exemplary

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Exemplary
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Exemplary
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Exemplary
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Joanne is extremely professional in the classroom. She is well-prepared for professional interactions and communicates well with others
in the educational field. She is always open to suggestions and critiques, and is a pleasure to work with.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Developing

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Developing
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Developing
and develop learning targets.

4/5
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Joanne is beginning to explore student progress in her classroom. This is an area of growth for her during this placement and she will
provide evidence of this important data during the next visit.

5/5