Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
org/joc
robert.vianello@irb.hr
Received August 11, 2010
7670 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7670–7681 Published on Web 10/28/2010 DOI: 10.1021/jo101581a
r 2010 American Chemical Society
Vianello and Maksic
JOC Article
stabilization of highly reactive short-lived cations such as CN group is the most suitable substituent in polysubstituted
HC60þ and C60•þ,6 C6H7þ,7 Bu3Snþ,8 and (Me)2Clþ.9 Re- systems if high acidity is desired. The multiple NO2 substitution
cently, the use of carboranes was pivotal in providing leads to strong Coulomb repulsion and pronounced nonplanar-
experimental evidence that the proton (Hþ) in aqueous ities. A particularly interesting class of very “strong yet gentle”
solution10 was neither Eigen ion11 nor Zundel-type ion12 superacids is given by carboranes as discussed in extenso in
but had a Hþ(H2O)6 structure instead. Three main strategies several papers by Reed and co-workers30-33 and in a recent
have been developed for this purpose. The first was based on computational study by Koppel and co-workers.34 In this
the application of the electronic super-acceptor substituents connection, it should be pointed out that Reed, Wang, Kass
exemplified by dNSO2CF313,14 or some other acidifying and co-workers35 measured the gas-phase acidity of H(CHB11-
groups,15-17 whereas in the second approach a concept Cl11) carborane yielding ΔHacid = 241 ( 29 kcal mol-1. The
was proposed of multiple hydrogen bond stabilization of B3LYP/6-311þG(d,p) and G3(MP2) calculations gave for the
the deprotonation center that greatly enhances the acidity.18 acidity 237.6 and 238.3 kcal mol-1, respectively, strongly
This is a generalization of the multiple corona effect found in indicating that H(CHB11Cl11) is the strongest gas-phase inor-
protonated bases19,20 and single intramolecular or intermo- ganic hyperacid so far.
lecular corona buttressing effect in some acids.21,22 The third Design and syntheses of new compounds exhibiting super-
approach is based on the concept of stabilization of the acidity would be rewarding for several reasons. They would
conjugate bases via a very strong anionic resonance assisted enable formation of new organic cations obtained by proton-
by a large number of cyano substituents.23-28 The cyano ation of weak bases. A dense ladder of superacids entering the
group is a substituent of choice, since it represents the domain of strong superbases36-41 is desirable, since their mutual
optimal compromise between high electron-withdrawing interaction would lead to a spontaneous proton transfer in the
strength and very modest steric requirements.28,29 Our study gas phase42-44 and formation of new ion pairs45,46 offering novel
on substituted methanes and cyclopentadienes showed that molecular systems exhibiting unexpected, interesting, and poten-
NO2 group is a stronger acidifying factor than CN for a tially useful features. Finally, it should be kept in mind that
singly substituted C(sp3) carbon atom.28 However, the triple strong acids are irreplaceable reagents in organic syntheses4,47,48
and pentuple cyanation and nitration of methane and cyclo- and in industrial catalysis49-51 of coal liquefaction, hydrocarbon
pentadiene, respectively, provide convincing evidence that a isomerization, cracking, and alkylations that occur under
strongly acidic conditions. In order to overcome the poor
(6) Reed, C. A.; Kim, K. C.; Bolskar, R. D.; Mueller, L. J. Science 2000, reactivity of some starting materials, very strong acidic catalysts
289, 101–104.
(7) Reed, C. A.; Kim, K. C.; Stoyanov, E. S.; Stasko, D.; Tham, F. S.; and high temperatures have to be used.52
Mueller, L. J.; Boyd, P. D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1796–1804.
(8) Zharov, I. B.; King, T.; Havlas, Z.; Pardi, A.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 10253–10254. (30) Reed, C. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 121–128. and references
(9) Stoyanov, E. S.; Stoyanova, I. V.; Tham, F. S.; Reed, C. A. J. Am. therein.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4062–4063. (31) Avelar, A.; Tham, F. S.; Reed, C. A. Ang. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
(10) Stoyanov, E. S.; Stoyanova, I. V.; Reed, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 3491–3493.
2010, 132, 1484–1485. (32) Reed, C. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 133–139.
(11) Eigen, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1964, 3, 1. (33) Reed, C. A. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1669–1677.
(12) Zundel, G. In The Hydrogen Bond: Recent Developments in Theory and (34) Lipping, L.; Leito, I.; Koppel, I.; Koppel, I. A. J. Phys. Chem. A
Experiments; Schuster, P., Zundel, G., Sandorfy, C., Eds.; North-Holland: 2009, 113, 12972–12978.
Amsterdam, 1976; Vol. 2. (35) Meyer, M. M.; Wang, X.-B.; Reed, C. A.; Wang, L. S.; Kass, S. R.
(13) Koppel, I. A.; Taft, R. W.; Anvia, F.; Zhu, Sh.-Zh.; Hu, L.-Q.; Sung, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18050–18051.
K.-S.; DesMarteau, D. D.; Yagupolskii, L. M.; Yagupolskii, Y. L.; Ignat’ev, (36) Schwesinger, R.; Schlemper, H.; Hasenfratz, Ch.; Willaredt, J.;
N. V.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Volkonskii, Yu. A.; Vlasov, V. M.; Notario, R.; Dambacher, T.; Breuer, Th.; Ottaway, C.; Fletschinger, M.; Boele, J.; Fritz,
Maria, P.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3047–3057. H.; Putzas, D.; Rotter, H. W.; Bordwell, F. G.; Satish, A. V. G.; Ji, Z.; Peters,
(14) Koppel, I. A.; Burk, P.; Koppel, I.; Leito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, E. M.; Peters, K.; von Schnering, H. G. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1055–1081.
124, 5594–5600. (37) (a) Raab, V.; Kipke, J.; Gschwind, R. M.; Sundermayer, J. Chem.;
(15) Kutt, A.; Movchun, V.; Rodima, T.; Dansauer, T.; Rusanov, E. B.; Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1682–1693. (b) Kovacevic, B.; Maksic, Z. B. Chem.;Eur. J.
Leito, I.; Kaljurand, I.; Koppel, J.; Pihl, V.; Koppel, I.; Ovsjannikov, G.; 2002, 8, 1694–1702.
Toom, L.; Mishima, M.; Medebielle, M.; Lork, E.; Roschenthaler, G.-V.; (38) Raab, V.; Gauchenova, E.; Merkoulov, A.; Harms, K.; Sundermeyer,
Koppel, I. A.; Kolomeitsev, A. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2607–2620. J.; Kovacevic, B.; Maksic, Z. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15738–15743.
(16) Terrier, F.; Magnier, E.; Kizilian, E.; Wakselman, C.; Buncel, E. (39) Arumugam, S.; Verkade, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4827–4828.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5563–5571. (40) Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Koppel, I. A.; Rodima, T.; Barten, J.; Lork, E.;
(17) Hurtado, M.; M o, O.; Yan~ez, M.; Guillemin, J.-C. Croat. Chem. R€oschenthaler, G.-V.; Kaljurand, I.; K€ utt, A.; Koppel, I.; M€ aemets, V.;
Acta 2009, 82, 1–6. Leito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17656–17666.
(18) Tian, Z.; Fattahi, A.; Lis, L.; Kass, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, (41) Coles, M. P.; Arag on-Saez, P. J.; Oakley, S. H.; Hitchcock, P. B.;
16984–16988. Davidson, M. G.; Maksic, Z. B.; Vianello, R.; Leito, I.; Kaljurand, I.;
(19) Kovacevic, B.; Glasovac, Z.; Maksic, Z. B. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2002, Apperley, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16858–16868.
15, 765. (42) Alkorta, I.; Rozas, I.; M o, O.; Y ~ez, M.; Elguero, J. J. Phys. Chem.
an
(20) Eckert-Maksic, M.; Glasovac, Z.; Troselj, P.; K€ utt, A.; Rodima, T.; A 2001, 105, 7481–7485.
Koppel, I.; Koppel, I. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 30, 5176. (43) Mo, O.; Y an~ez, M.; Gonz ales, L.; Elguero, J. ChemPhysChem 2001,
(21) Hurtado, M.; Yan ~ez, M.; Herrero, R.; Guerrero, A.; Davalos, J. Z.; 7, 465–467.
Abboud, J.-L. M.; Khater, B.; Guillemin, J.-C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, (44) Raczy nska, E. D.; Gal, J.-F.; Maria, P.-C.; Szela-g, M. Croat. Chem.
4622–4629. Acta 2009, 82, 87–103.
(22) (a) Maksic, Z. B.; Vianello, R. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 843–846. (45) Catal an, J.; Palomar, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 293, 511–514.
(b) Maksic, Z. B.; Vianello, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1940–1945. (46) Catal an, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1908–1912.
(23) Vianello, R.; Maksic, Z. B. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 739–748. (47) Akiyama, T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5744–5758.
(24) Vianello, R.; Maksic, Z. B. New J. Chem. 2008, 32, 413–427. (48) Dalpozzo, R.; Bartoli, G.; Sambri, L.; Melchiorre, P. Chem. Rev.
(25) Vianello, R.; Maksic, Z. B. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9381–9390. 2010, 110, 3501–3551.
(26) Vianello, R.; Maksic, Z. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3711–3713. (49) Corma, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 559–614.
(27) Vianello, R.; Maksic, Z. B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 3571–3580. (50) Olah, G. A.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Sommer, J. Superacids; Wiley-
(28) Vianello, R.; Liebman, J. F.; Maksic, Z. B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, Interscience: New York, 1985.
5751–5760. (51) Busca, G. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5366–5410.
(29) Brand, H.; Liebman, J. F.; Schulz, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4665– (52) Olah, G. A.; Molnar, A. Hydrocarbon Chemistry; Wiley: New York,
4675. 1995.
Theoretical Methodology
According to Brønsted, acidity is the measure of the
capability of a molecule to give up a proton in a chemical
FIGURE 1. Structure of the tricyclic (I) and tetracyclic (II) Rees reaction. Accordingly, acidity in the gas phase is expressed
polyenes (R = H) and undecacyanofluoradene (III, R = H) and by eq 1, where GA is the gas-phase acidity (a free-energy
their polycyano derivatives (R = CN). term) and DPE is the deprotonation enthalpy (an enthalpy
term) for the reaction:
AHðgÞ f A- ðgÞ þ Hþ ðgÞ; ΔGacid ¼ GA; ΔHacid ¼ DPE
ð1Þ
Their molecular energies and the corresponding gas-phase stability of these four systems. Interestingly, it is found that
acidities are given in Table 1. A salient structural feature of the heptafulvene motif in 1b, 1f, 1g, and 1h gives rise to
compounds 1 and 2 is the central bridging C(sp3)-H subunit, increased stability relative to that of 1a also.
which brings rigidity into the systems. It “freezes” the [12] The most stable tautomer in this series, 2H-benz[cd]azulene
and [14]annulene networks, respectively, which are extre- 1b, was synthesized in 1966 by a multistep route based on the
mely floppy otherwise. carbene-mediated ring expansion of the acenaphthene frame-
9bH-Benz[cd]azulenes 1, a Quasi-[12]annulene. The struc- work.54 In this work Boekelheide and Smith noticed also a
ture of 9bH-benz[cd]azulene 1a is an interesting combination relative ease of formation of the anion 1-. Previously, Hafner
of five-, six-, and seven-membered rings bridged by a C(sp3) and Schaum had reported the synthesis of 3,4,7,9-tetramethyl
tertiary center, thus formally forming an antiaromatic quasi- derivative of 1b and observed a higher stability of this product
[12]annulene (Figure 3a). The prototropic tautomerism leads relative to the 1f tautomer.63 This topic was recently revived by
to 13 tautomers in total as shown in Figure 3a, which all but McGlinchey and co-workers, who found a new method for the
one (1m) are more stable than the initial parent structure. preparation of the 2H-benz[cd]azulene 1b system and its
They are obtained by the hydrogen walk from the central derivatives.64 Since the parent compound 1a is the least stable,
C(sp3) site in 1a to 12 different peripheral C(sp2) positions. its acidity is the highest (ΔHacid = 310.7 kcal mol-1), the
Their relative total electronic energies against the parent tautomer 1m being an exception. The tautomer 1b is the most
compound 1a are given by the B3LYP/6-31þG(d) method. It stable in the series, thus defining the upper bound in deproto-
appears that they are more stable than the initial system 1a nation enthalpy given by ΔHacid(1b) = 343.3 kcal mol-1,
except for the structures 1l and 1m, which are practically implying that it is the least acidic. With this deprotonation
degenerate with progenitor 1a, taking into account the enthalpy, molecule 1b is placed between Rees cyclic polyenes I
accuracy of the method. The lower energies of 1b-1e tauto- and II (R = H) on the acidity ladder, since their deprotonation
mers are expected in view of the presence of the benzene enthalpies in the gas phase have the values ΔHacid(I) = 345.6
moiety, which significantly contributes toward a greater kcal mol-1 and ΔHacid(II) = 341.3 kcal mol-1.24 However, as it
will become apparent below, polycyano derivative of 1b is
(62) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, slightly more acidic than both polycyano substituted Rees
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J., J., A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci,
molecules I and II.24
B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, It is important to point out that the resulting anion 1-
M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, (conjugate base) is the same in all 13 tautomers. It has a
T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.;
Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; planar framework possessing a H€ uckel aromatic number of
Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; 14 π-electrons stabilized by the anionic resonance reflected in
Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; 13 Pauling’s resonance structures in total. Since all tauto-
Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain,
M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; mers 1a-1m share the same final conjugate base, the varia-
Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, tions in their acidity is determined by their ground state (GS)
J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Martin, J. M. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; (63) Hafner, K.; Schaum, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1963, 2, 95.
Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02; (64) Balduzzi, S.; M€
uller-Bunz, H.; McGlinchey, M. J. Chem.;Eur. J.
Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004. 2004, 10, 5398–5405.
FIGURE 3. (a) Prototropic tautomerism in 9bH-benz[cd]azulene. The relative stabilities in electronic energies (in kcal mol-1) are calculated by
the B3LYP/6-31þG(d) method. (b) Prototropic tautomerism in nonacyano-9bH-benz[cd]azulene. The relative stabilities in electronic energies
are given in kcal mol-1 as calculated by the B3LYP/6-31þG(d) method.
FIGURE 5. (a) Prototropic tautomerism in hexacyclic compound 3. The relative stabilities in electronic energies (in kcal mol-1) are calculated
by the B3LYP/6-31þG(d) method. (b) Prototropic tautomerism in dodecacyano derivative of the hexacyclic compound 3. The relative
stabilities in electronic energies (in kcal mol-1) are calculated by the B3LYP/6-31þG(d) method.
Further, 3a is a much more potent acid than both unsubstituted acidic that the experimentally measured value for H(CHB11-
Rees hydrocarbons I and II (ΔHacid(I) = 345.6 kcal mol-1 and Cl11).35 It is worth pointing out that 3aCN is by 47 orders of
ΔHacid(II) = 341.3 kcal mol-1)24 as well as unsubstituted magnitude stronger an acid than sulfuric acid in the gas phase.
fluoradene molecule III (ΔHacid(III) = 330.3 kcal mol-1),24 Recently,76 it was demonstrated that oxidation of a ter-
which had served as a molecular skeleton for its hyperacidic tiary nitrogen atom yielding an amine-N-oxide group
undecacyano derivative.24 (R3Nþ-O-) in the vicinity of a deprotonation center am-
Dodecacyano derivative of 3a has a total of 6 prototropic plifies the acidity around 9-17 kcal mol-1 in the gas phase.
tautomers displayed in Figure 5b. Derivative 3aCN is again the Therefore, it is of some interest to apply the same principle to
most stable tautomer as a result of the presence of three fused molecules 3 and 3CN in an attempt to design even more
benzene moieties. Interestingly, the cyanation did not change potent superacids. It should be mentioned that such oxida-
much the relative stability of tautomers, although polycyana- tion of tertiary amines is readily performed with hydrogen
tion introduced significant nonplanarities induced by congested peroxide or peroxy acids and that it serves as a convenient
CN groups. It is intuitively expected that 3aCN is the most acidic protective group for amino or imino nitrogen in synthetic
compound considered here for two reasons: (1) the parent work.77 Formation of an N-oxide group at the central
compound 3a is already more acidic than fluoradene (III) for position of molecule 3 produces the same number of tauto-
R = H, and (2) it has an additional CN group compared to mers in 4 and in its polycyanated derivative 4CN compared to
polycyanofluoradene (R = CN) in Figure 1. Indeed, its depro- parent compound with practically identical relative stabili-
tonation enthalpy is ΔHacid(3aCN) = 242.8 kcal mol-1, which is ties of tautomers as presented in Figure 5a and b. Therefore,
by 14.4 and 8.1 kcal mol-1 lower than in 1bCN and 2bCN, we will comment only on the acidity of the most stable
respectively, implying that its acidity is higher. Most impor-
tantly, it follows that molecule 3aCN is a true neutral organic
(76) Vianello, R. Croat. Chem. Acta 2009, 82, 27–39.
hyperacid, since its deprotonation enthalpy is below the hyper- (77) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthe-
acidity threshold24 of 245 kcal mol-1. It is just 2 kcal mol-1 less sis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991.
FIGURE 8. Calculated HOMA parameters. Chemical bonds taken into account in forming monocycles are given in bold, and the number of
π-electrons n distributed over cycle is given as a subscript next to the HOMA index. Note that there is only one π-bonding pattern in neutral
molecules.