Você está na página 1de 4

Against the Grain Press - The Informer Page 1 of 4

http://www.atgpress.com/inform/ba007.htm Go JUL OCT NOV Close

35 captures 10 Help
31 Aug 01 - 10 Oct 08 2007 2008 2009

"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman
Home The Informer
Against the
Grain To Make You Think Series #15
Livid Leigh On everybody's Individual Master File that we have checked
there exists codes. Two codes in particular have been deciphered to
Boilin' Ed
mean that your money taken by IRS goes into either codes. These
codes are for Trusts. Just what are these trusts, we wondered.
D. Tom
Well, from a book printed in 1924 we find the answer.
The Informer
We all have known that the international bankers control
Knowledge is Congress, the Executive and have written in to the Federal Reserve
Freedom Act a provision that protects these international bankers . Who are
these International bankers and where did they come from? The book
Privacy describes in detail the answers to these questions. The Bank of
England, created in 1694, controls every bank in this country.
Links Strangely enough the King or Crown has no control over this Bank of
England. That is right, the Bank has control of the Crown also.
Court Case
What was created in this country was a Money Trust. From the
Contact Us minutes of the Committee on Banking and Currency of the Senate,
Saturday August 1,1914 comes these quotes:

© 1994 - 2007 From Mr. Warburg, who was nominated to the Federal Reserve
Against the Board, is his statement in answering a question put to him, "Well,
Grain the Aldrich bill brings the whole system into 1 unit while this
Site Design, Hosting
deals with 12 units and unites them again into the Federal Reserve
and Logo Board."
by DNA Web Media

Here Warburg is stating that the Aldrich bill and the Federal
Reserve Act are fundamentally the same. Thus it is admitted before
a committee of the U.S. Senate that Woodrow Wilson, as President of
the U.S., adopted this despicable subterfuge of creating 12 Federal
Reserve Banks in the place of one and then united them in the
Federal Reserve Board, thus deceiving and betraying the American
people into the hands of a legalized "Money Trust," so said T.
Daniel Cushing. In the same Senate Committee Mr. Warburg describes
just who is this Money Trust.

Here is who ran the country in 1914; not the Congress or the
President's executive; they are "This Committee reports that a
Money Trust exists in this country composed of J.P. Morgan and Co.,
The First National Bank of New York, The National City Bank of New
York, The First National Bank of New York, Lee Higginson and Co. Of
Boston, New York, Kidder, Peabody and Co. Of Boston and New York,
and New York, Kuhn, Loeb and Co. Of New York."

Thus Mr. Cushing had read the Committee Reports which in


essence stated that the Federal Reserve Act embodies and enlarges
the Bank of England scheme of creating debts without lending money.
The fact being that the Government cannot issue a dollar under this
act, or even a federal reserve note, unless a bank borrows it on a

http://web.archive.org/web/20081010170954/http://www.atgpress.com/inform/ba007.htm 3/13/2012
Against the Grain Press - The Informer Page 2 of 4

debt already created against the borrower; and this note is itself
a debt, not money, being redeemable at the United States Treasury,
by the people in gold. Thus the Federal Reserve notes are issued
for and entirely controlled by Banking Corporations organized for
private gain, and are in no sense Government notes issued in the
interest of the people.

Are you getting a better picture when I wrote The New History
of America which sheds light on this fact? A hidden fact is that
after Congress created this abomination called the Federal Reserve,
which consisted of people tied with the Bank of England, the Bank
of England was appointed by the Federal Reserve Board, in December,
1916, as its agent, through the influence of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, the central bank of the system, of which Benjamin
Strong was the Governor.

So now what we have is that banks prefer Government bonds over


all other forms of debts as they give a mortgage upon the
government itself and the national taxing power collects the
interest and guarantees the payment of the principal. You my dear
friends are taxed because of these notes that are your promise to
pay the mortgaged Congress, way before 1933 ever happened. To prove
this, Mr. Cushing, who wrote this book I am quoting from, called
REAL MONEY versus False Money - Bank Credits, has the copy of the
actual Contract between J.P. Morgan & Co., August Belmont & Co. And
Messrs. N.M. Rothschild & Sons, London, England, and the United
States Treasury, dated February 8, 1895. This contract goes all the
way back to July 14, 1870 and takes control and changes every law
made on money from that point on.

So you are asking why am I taxed by the United States through a


private collection agency called the IRS and on the back of my
canceled check it says pay to the Federal Reserve Bank to THE
CREDIT of the United States?

Here is your answer quoted from Cushing's book.


"The representatives of the American people in Congress
assembled chartered national banks, virtually telling them (for the
result demonstrated it), "We will issue to you millions of first
mortgage bonds upon the property of the people of the United States
and pledge the
SERVICES and ASSETS OF ALL THE PEOPLE to redeem at par with
interest, and in order that you may pay for them without
inconvenience will allow you to deposit them in the United States
Treasury, still draw your interest on them, and the Government will
allow you to issue 90 percent of the money it will require YOU TO
PAY FOR THEM, and we will make your national bank notes absolutely
good, by agreeing to redeem them at par." (Emphasis mine)

Here is your income tax for the privilege of using private debt
notes. Reread the above quote and note that the "national bank
notes" are not federal reserve notes but United States notes.
Cushing states then, "As a matter of fact, when you say that a bank
note, a silver certificate, or any kind of promise to pay, has to
be redeemed in something else--for instance gold--before it becomes
a legal tender to pay a debt, it simply means that debts are issued
as a circulating medium instead of real money." People, contrary to
what you believe, gold and silver ARE NOT REAL MONEY, although they
could be money.

Real money is the "DOLLAR." And until you can understand this
you will forever be lost. Money can be anything. It can be corn,
sheepswool, gold, silver, acorns, water or anything of value. As
Cushing states, "It is, as a matter of fact, a unit of merchandise.
. .mere merchandise fixes the purchasing power of the dollar." As

http://web.archive.org/web/20081010170954/http://www.atgpress.com/inform/ba007.htm 3/13/2012
Against the Grain Press - The Informer Page 3 of 4

to gold being the dollar?

Cushing states, "I will now show that this is an absolute


fallacy and will first prove that the unit of value in the United
States is the DOLLAR and not the 25.8 grains of gold in the
dollar." Cushing then goes into The Act of Congress April 2, 1792
and also into Section 20 which is to lengthy to put here. At the
end of his dissertation on the subject he states, "This act
establishes $1 as the legal unit of value in the United States and
then says that when gold is coined into a dollar or money unit it
shall contain 25.8 grains of gold, and this gold shall be weighed
according to the standard weight used at the mints before being
coined into money units or dollars. ....I will now prove that the
dollar puts the value into gold and not the gold the value into the
dollar. .

Fix the basic fact in mind, that value depends upon demand. . .
. To make it more explicit and so plain that no man can refute it,
the lawful money of the United States is created by the sovereign
power of its people, each dollar of money unit is complete in
itself; each has the same value, the same purchasing and debt-
paying power; their equality or parity is necessarily the same, as
each has its redemption alike in all the property and services of
the people without discrimination.. . . .In conclusion, I would
impress upon the mind that a dollar is not a debt, but a redeemer
of debt; therefore one dollar should not be redeemed in another
dollar.

This is an invention of the money lender and manufacturer of


debts: A reversal of all sound ideas of finance that ever existed.
It is based on the absurdity that a dollar is a debt. A dollar has
never been a debt. [REMEMBER PEOPLE HE IS NOT TALKING ABOUT A FRN
HERE] A dollar has never been a debt. It is not made for
redemption, but is made to be a redeemer.

If the paper dollar is treated as a debt, then the gold dollar


must be treated as a debt, else the one dollar is not at a parity
of function with the other dollar; then one has the quality that
the other does not posses, and the two dollars are not treated on
equal terms. There is no sound and stable money system unless every
money unit in that system is legally equivalent to every other
money unit"

These you have but a small portion of this 338 page book. This
proves that the FRN is not money in any sense of the word although
it buys things of value it is a debt passed along. It has to be
taxed to retake the over production of FRN's that lead to
inflation. It the reason the "Money Trust" must tax it's notes for
their use because the contract entered into by the Congress took
away Congress's right to remain sovereign. That is why they cannot
audit or get rid of a private corporation based in London England
that controls every bank in America.

NOW DO YOU KNOW WHO THE REAL ENEMY IS?

I hope so. Those people in the background are the real movers and
shakers and it is evident because in Cushing's book he states
quotes and documented evidence on how the Bank of England, through
those in the Money Trust control the president of the U.S. , the
Congress because they got Congress to pass a section in the Federal
Reserve Act that absolutely protects the bankers and destroys the
people through their taxing power on their private notes.

If there is enough interest I will write more. But I don't

http://web.archive.org/web/20081010170954/http://www.atgpress.com/inform/ba007.htm 3/13/2012
Against the Grain Press - The Informer Page 4 of 4

believe there is enough interest.

Why? Because there has been little interest in all the phone
taxes that you pay that can amount from 15 to 75 dollars a month. A
man in North Carolina was disgusted and is doing something about
it, It is on a web page - http:// www.atgpress.com Following the
directions and writing to the Commission address and asking for the
complaint and attendant exhibits is like handing to you on a silver
platter all that is needed to institute a suit in your state
against any phone company. All the taxes are non-constitutional and
have no basis to exist. They are all administrative taxes and not
authorized by Congress.

I have come to the conclusion that people like to be treated


like slaves and chattel property of the corporations who are
nothing but pawns of the banking cartel. It's all in Cushing's book
how corporations and banking run American's lives, over which
Congress has no control.

One last dig into you mind is this quote from the book in which
is a reply from the Bank of England.

"Reply of the governor of the Bank of England to our National


Monetary Commission, 1910.
The Bank of England regulates the conditions under which the trade
of the country is carried on, and imposes a charge on the trade of
the country for legitimate accommodations."

The Informer

http://web.archive.org/web/20081010170954/http://www.atgpress.com/inform/ba007.htm 3/13/2012