INIDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I - III

Name of Employee: MARIE ROSE F. ROBLES Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER - I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Result
QET Outstanding (5) (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) (1)
Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No
Education Knowledge of content within and content and its content and its content and its content and its acceptable
Service and Pedagogy across curriculum integration within integration within integration within integration within evidence was
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject shown
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No

lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 the given MOV. acceptable
and supported by any and supported by any and supported by any evidence was
1 of the other given 1 of the other given 1 of the other given shown
MOV. MOV. MOV.

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of 7.5% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
Service that enhance learner strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was
achievement in promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, shown
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills. shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
literacy and
numeracy skills.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 learner- No

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered centered lesson as acceptable
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown in any of the evidence was
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and MOV. shown
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
the other MOV the other MOV the other MOV
given. given. given.

Timeliness
ew:

DURING EVALUATION

Score
 Performance Indicators
Weight per Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA QET Actual Result Score
Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor(1)
Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Service develop critical and that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
creative thinking, as and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative
well as other higher- and / or other HOTS as and / or other HOTS and / or other HOTS thinking and / or
order thinking skills. shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 other HOTS as
a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced as evidenced by any evidence was
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and 1 of the given MOV. shown
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 supported by any 1
the other given MOV. of the other given of the other given
MOV. MOV.

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom June 2018 7.5% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment structure to engage March 2019 management management management management evidence was
Service and Diversity of learners, individually strategies that engage strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
Learning or in groups, in learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
meaningful activities/tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as
exploration, discovery shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
and hands-on activities a rating of 7 arating of 6 a rating of 5 with arating of 4
within a range of
physical learning
environments.

Efficiency Submmited at least 4 Submmited 3 lessons Submmited 2 lessons Submmited 1 lesson No acceptale
lessons suported by suported by MOV 1 suported by MOV 1 suported by MOV 1 evidence was
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the and any 1 of the shown
the other acceptable other acceptable other acceptable other acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV
 Efficiency Submmited at least 4 Submmited 3 lessons Submmited 2 lessons Submmited 1 lesson No acceptale
lessons suported by suported by MOV 1 suported by MOV 1 suported by MOV 1 evidence was
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the and any 1 of the shown
the other acceptable other acceptable other acceptable other acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Weight per Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA QET Poor Actual Result
Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 5. Managed learner 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education behavior management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
promote positive and promote positive promote positive promote positive and
and non-violent non-violent discipline and non-violent and non-violent non-violent discipline
discipline to ensure as shown in MOV discipline as shown discipline as shown as shown in MOV
learning-focused submitted with a in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a
environments. rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1 lesson.
lessons. lessons. lessons.

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 7.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evdence was
Services developmentally teaching strategies to teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies to shown
appropriate learning address learner to address learner to address learner address learner
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
experiences to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learners' of 7. of 6. of 5. of 4.
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
address learners'
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evdence was
teaching strategies in teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
at least 2 lessons as in at least 2 lessons in least 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
evidenced by MOV 1 as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 evidehown in any 1
and supported by MOV 1 and and supported by of the acceptable
any 1 of the other supported by any 1 any 1 of the other MOV.
acceptable MOV of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Score
 Performance Indicators
Weight per Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Result
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2)
(4) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Education and Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
and learning processes and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
to meet curriculum asshown in MOV 1 asshown in MOV 1 asshown in MOV 1 asshown in MOV 1
requirements and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
varied teaching
context.

Efficiency Submmited at least 4 Submmited at least 3 Submmited at least 2 Submmited 1 No

developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching evidence was
and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process shown
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of
given MOV. given MOV. given MOV. the other given MOV.

Timeliness
8. Participated in 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated in No
collegial discussions participated in LACs participated in LACs participated in LACs LAC /FGDs/ meetings acceptable
that use teacher and /FGDs/ meetings to /FGDs/ meetings to /FGDs/ meetings to to discuss teacher/ evidence was
learner feedback to discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ learner feedback to shown
enrich teaching learner feedback to learner feedback to learner feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. enrich instruction as enrich instruction as enrich instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted.
submitted. submitted. submitted.
Efficiency Participated in at least Participated in at least Participated in at least Participated 1 LAC/ No
4 LACs/ FGDs 3 LACs/ FGDs 2 LACs/ FGDs FGDs meetings as acceptable
meetings as evidently meetings as evidently meetings as evidently evidently shown in evidence was
shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the given shown
given MOV given MOV given MOV MOV

Timeliness
Score
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline Very Satisfactory Actual Result
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1)
(4)
Q E T Ave
Basic 9. Selected, developed, 7.5% Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
Education organized and used varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
services appropriate teaching learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
and learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT to address address learning goals address learning goals address learning goals address learning
learning goals. as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 goals as shown in
with a rating of 7. with a rating of 6. with a rating of 5. MOV 1 with a rating
of 4.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 teaching Submitted 2 teaching Submitted 1 teaching No acceptable
varied teaching and and learning resources and learning and learning evidence was
learning resources as evidenced by at resources as resources as shown
including ICT, as least 1 of the evidenced by at least evidenced by any of
evidently shown in acceptable MOV 1 of the acceptable the acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and supported MOV
by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV.

Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, selected, June 2018 - 7.5% Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Education Assesment organized and used Murch 2019 organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
Sevices and diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown
and summative and summative and summative and summative and summative
Reporting assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 varied No acceptable
varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently evidently shown in any evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of the 1 of the acceptable any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable MOV. MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV.

Timeliness
Score
 Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Result
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)

Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently monitored Occationally Rarely monitored No
Education evaluated learner March monitored and and evaluated monitored and and evaluated acceptable
Services progress and 2019 evaluated learner learner progress and evaluated learner learner progress and evidence was
achievement using progress and achievement using progress and achievement using shown
learner attainment achievement using learner attainment achievement using learner attainment
data . learner attainment data as shown in the learner attainment data as shown in the
data as shown in the MOV submitted data as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV. acceptable
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV. the acceptable Submitted MOV was evidence was
acceptable MOV. Submitted MOV were MOV.Submitted MOV completed in only 1 shown
Submitted MOV were distributed acress 3 were distributed in 2 quarter.
distributed across 4 quarters. quarters.
quarters.

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted MOV was No
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 were distributed completed in only 1 acceptable
quarters. quarters. across 2 quarters. quarter. evidence was
shown

Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.5% Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No
Education promptly and clearly. March prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear acceptable
Services The learners' need, 2019 communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence was
progress and the learners' needs, the learners' needs, the learners' needs, the learners' needs, shown
achievement to key progress and progress and progress and progress and
stakeholders, achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of at combination of at combination of at acceptable MOV acceptable
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted MOV was No
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 were distributed completed in only 1 acceptable
quarters. quarters. across 2 quarters. quarter. evidence was
shown
Score
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Result
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2)
(4) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed 10% Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occationaly performed Rarely performed No acceptable
Education factor various related various related work/ various related work/ various related work/ various related work/ evidence was
Services work/acivities that activities that activities that activities that activities that shown
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
teaching-learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process Consistently performed Consistently performed Consistently performed Consistently performed
various related works/ various related works/ various related works/ various related works/
activities that activities that activities that activities that
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the
MOV submitted. MOV submitted. MOV submitted. MOV submitted.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
RATING FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHMENT

GLENDA I. PIRA MARIE ROSE F. ROBLES ____________________________

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Score