© All Rights Reserved

0 visualizações

© All Rights Reserved

- Process Dynamics and Control, Ch. 11 Solution Manual
- Advance Control System
- State Feedback
- Stability
- Least Squares Method
- 2132finalformulapage_Spr08
- Notes-LinearSystems
- Calculus Es 7 So Lns
- Declaration, Indexrit
- Louis H. Kauffman- Take Home Exam - Math 310 - Linear Algebra - Spring 2008
- Iterative Methods
- A Methodology for Modeling Based on Fuzzy Clustering...
- Autocatalytic Sets and the Growth of Complexity in an Evolutionary Model
- 12723-42653-1-PB (1).pdf
- ACS
- Maths IBVPs 3
- Math 55 - 1st Long Exam Review
- 0779
- Notespacket - Macro II
- Maximum & Minimum Problems Lagrange

Você está na página 1de 8

Qualitative

Analysis of

Critical Points

26–1

Chapter 26: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL POINTS 26–2

In Chapter 24 stability was informally defined as the ability of a physical system to return to

equilibrium when disturbed. If the equilibrium is static in nature, we speak of static stability. For

a more precise definition concerning a mechanical system, let’s hear Dirichlet:1

“The equilibrium [of a mechanical system] is stable if, in displacing the points of the system from

their equilibrium positions by an infinitesimal amount and giving each one a small initial velocity,

the displacements of different points of the system remain, throughout the course of the motion,

contained within small prescribed limits”

(2) The problem of ascertaining the stability of a solution concerns the “neighborhood”

of the particular solution and is therefore a local one.

(3) The concept of stability is inherently dynamic in nature. But for a conservative

system dynamics can be “factored out” of the problem, and we are left with a static

criterion.

As discussed in Chapter 24, the static stability of a conservative mechanical system can be tested

completely using a static criterion. Such criterion, often referred to as the Euler stability test,

energy test, or method of adjacent states, relates to the positive definiteness character of the second

variation of the potential energy.

We know that a stationary value of the total potential energy with respect to the state variables is

necessary and sufficient for the equilibrium of the system. Proceeding one step further, a complete

relative minimum of the total potential energy is necessary and sufficient for the stability of an

equilibrium state.

For a discrete system with a finite number of degrees of freedom the criterion can be enunciated in

terms of the definiteness of the tangent stiffness matrix K if all state variables are of displacement

type, which we assume in the sequel (see Remark below). For a conservative system we know that

K is a symmetric matrix.

1 As it appears in his Appendix to the German translation of Lagrange’s Mécanique Analytique (1853).

26–2

26–3 §26.2 STABILITY OF A DISCRETE CONSERVATIVE SYSTEM

(u, λcr )

(u, λ1 ), λ1 < λcr

λcr λ

u

REMARK 26.1

The restriction to systems with displacement state variables aims to exclude those in which Lagrange multipliers

are carried along as degrees of freedom. For such systems the criterion applies upon eliminating the multipliers,

but such elimination is often messy and would complicate the exposition.

The stability criterion for a conservative system is summarized in the following table.

equilibrium position is at that position has a position is

positive semidefinite cylindrical or inflexion point neutrally stable

indefinite saddle point unstable

If the eigenvalues of K are easily available a test for stability is immediate.2 If all eigenvalues

are greater than zero, the matrix is positive definite and the equilibrium is stable. If one or more

eigenvalues are zero and the rest positive, the equilibrium is neutrally stable. If one or more

eigenvalues are negative, the equilibrium is unstable.

In practice an eigenvalue test can be recommended only for small matrices, say of order less than 20

or so. For larger matrices the same information can be obtained more economically by decomposing

K using triangular factorization or Gauss elimination, as discussed in Remark 24.2. If all pivots

26–3

Chapter 26: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL POINTS 26–4

L1

( u1 , u 2 , λ1 )

u2 L2

u1

are positive, the equilibrium is stable. If at least one pivot is negative, the equilibrium is unstable.

The border case of neutral stability is more difficult to detect in the presence of rounding errors.

As discussed in previous sections, there is a close relationship between equilibrium configurations,

occurrence of critical points, and the stability of the system. We now examine qualitatively, follow-

ing the classical treatise of Thompson and Hunt,3 four types of critical points from the standpoint

of the variation of the total potential energy in the neighborhood of equilibrium states. This is

done with the typical response plots in which the control parameter λ is the vertical axis while a

representative displacement u or deformation mode amplitude is shown along the horizontal axis

as state parameter.

Drawing conventions are as follows: heavy lines represent equilibrium paths, continuous lines

denoting stable paths while broken lines denote unstable paths. Plots of total potential energy

(u, λ) at various fixed values of λ are shown as “shaded profile” energy surfaces. These surfaces

deform as the parameter λ changes. Equilibrium configurations correspond to stationary points of

with respect to u. Strong minima (maxima) of this surface are associated with stable (unstable)

equilibrium configurations.

We first consider the case of a limit point, which is shown in Figure 26.1. The fundamental

equilibrium path that starts from the origin (the reference configuration u = 0, λ = 0) is initially

stable. Stability is lost when the local maximum at λ = λcr is reached. λ = λcr . A “snap-through”

26–4

26–5 §26.3 STABILITY TRANSFORMATION AT A LIMIT POINT

Secondary path

B

(u, λcr )

λcr λ (u, λ1 ), λ1 < λcr

u

response of this form is characteristic of shallow arches and domes. At a fixed value λ = λ1 less

than λcr the total potential energy (u, λ1 ) has a minimum with respect to the state parameter

u on the stable rising region of the path and a maximum on the unstable falling region. As the

prescribed value of λ is increased the maximum and minimum approach each other and coalesce

when λ = λcr . At this critical point the total potential energy (u, λ) has an horizontal point of

inflexion. At a higher value of λ, say λ2 > λcr , there are no local equilibrium states and the total

potential energy (u, λ2 ) has no stationary point. The critical equilibrium state is seen to be itself

unstable, and the absence of local equilibrium states at values of λ greater than λcr implies that a

physical system under slowly increasing λ will eventually snap-through dynamically. Limit points

are generally insensitive to imperfections.

A more general schematic diagram is shown in three dimensions in Figure 26.2 on a plot of λ

against two state parameters, v1 and v2 . This plot includes a remote rising region of the equilibrium

path since this is often encountered with this type of behavior. A total potential energy surface

(v1 , v2 , λ) is drawn for a fixed value of λ < λcr . As λ is slowly increased through its critical

value the system will “snap through” dynamically, eventually stop, and initiate a large amplitude,

nonlinear vibration about the remote stable equilibrium path. In the presence of some damping the

system will eventually rest on that path.

These figures illustrate the physics well but if we are dealing with a system with many degrees of

freedom care must be taken in drawing conclusions from these schematic figures. On an actual plot

of λ against one of the vi ’s, the limit point is normally seen as a smooth maximum, but it must be

realized that for a certain choice of the state parameter vi the point might appear as a sharp cusp.

The smooth maximum of a path in three-dimensional space can for example be seen as a cusp if

the eye is directed along the horizontal tangent to the path.

26–5

Chapter 26: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL POINTS 26–6

Secondary path

(u, λ2 ), λ2 > λcr

(u, λcr )

B

(u, λ1 ), λ1 < λcr

λcr

λ

Primary (fundamental) path

After the limit point we consider bifurcation or branching points. We cover the three most common

types of bifurcation: asymmetric, stable-symmetric, and unstable symmetric.

Figure 26.3 shows the case of an asymmetric point of bifurcation. The initially stable fundamental

equilibrium path that emanates from the origin loses its stability on intersecting a distinct and

continuous secondary (post-buckling) equilibrium path. The intersection point B is a critical point

of bifurcation type. An asymmetric bifurcation point is characterized by the fact that both paths

have a nonzero slope with respect to λ at B.

With varying λ the paths exhibit a phenomenon called exchange of stability. For λ1 < λcr the total

potential energy (u, λ1 ) has a minimum with respect to u on the stable region of the fundamental

path and a maximum with respect to u on the unstable region of the post-buckling path. As λ is

increased the maximum and minimum finally coalesce so that at λ = λcr the total potential energy

(u, λcr ) has a horizontal point of inflexion at the critical equilibrium state. At λ values over the

critical one the maximum and minimum exchange places. Since an unstable branch emanates from

B, the critical equilibrium state is unstable. In the presence of small disturbances a physical system

under slowly increasing λ would snap dynamically from this critical equilibrium state despite the

existence of stable equilibrium states at higher values of λ.

Critical points of this type are moderately to highly sensitive to the presence of loading or fabrication

imperfections.

26–6

26–7 §26.4 STABILITY EXCHANGE AT BIFURCATION POINTS

B

(u , λcr )

λcr

λ Secondary path

Symmetric bifurcation points are characterized by the fact that the intersecting path has zero slope

with respect to the control parameter at B. These points may be categorized into stable and unstable,

depending on whether the intersecting post-buckling) path is “rising” or “falling”.

Figure 26.4 depicts the case of an stable-symmetric point of bifurcation. Here a fundamental

equilibrium path rising monotonically from the reference state is seen to intersect a stable rising

secondary (post-buckling) path that passes smoothly through the critical equilibrium state with zero

slope. The continuation of the fundamental path beyond B is unstable. The total potential energy

(u, λ1 ), where λ1 < λcr , has a single stationary value with respect to u, namely the minimum

on the stable region of the fundamental path, and as the value of λ is increased this minimum is

transformed into two minima and one maximum. The critical equilibrium state is neutrally stable

and the secondary path is stable, so a physical system under slowly increasing λ would exhibit no

dynamic snap but would follow the stable rising post-buckling path, the direction taken depending

on the small disturbances or imperfections which are inevitably present.

Critical points of this type are insensitive to the presence of imperfections.

The last configuration examined here is the unstable-symmetric point of bifurcation, shown in

Figure 26.5. Here the fundamental path intersects an unstable falling path which as in the previous

case has a zero slope at the critical equilibrium state. At a prescribed value of λ = λ1 < λcr

26–7

Chapter 26: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL POINTS 26–8

the total potential energy (u, λ1 ) has now three stationary values with respect to u, namely two

maxima on the unstable post-buckling or secondary path, and a minimum on the stable region of

the fundamental path. As the figure shows, these three stationary points transform into a single

maximum with increasing λ. The critical equilibrium state is seen to be unstable, so a physical

system would snap dynamically from the critical equilibrium state, the direction taken depending

on the postulated small disturbances or imperfections.

Critical points of this type are highly sensitive to the presence of structural or loading imperfections.

Sometimes the sensitivity is extreme, as in the classical case of the axially compressed cylindrical

shell discussed in §25.4.

26–8

- Process Dynamics and Control, Ch. 11 Solution ManualEnviado porBen Spearman
- Advance Control SystemEnviado porcoep05
- State FeedbackEnviado porNipuna_Wickram_5399
- StabilityEnviado porTamizhan_K
- Least Squares MethodEnviado porMuhammadAbdulRasool
- 2132finalformulapage_Spr08Enviado porkohitha
- Notes-LinearSystemsEnviado porRenu Koshal
- Calculus Es 7 So LnsEnviado porYasmine Lewis
- Declaration, IndexritEnviado porRitesh Upadhayay
- Louis H. Kauffman- Take Home Exam - Math 310 - Linear Algebra - Spring 2008Enviado porKluff5878
- Iterative MethodsEnviado porRao Visweswara Mohan
- A Methodology for Modeling Based on Fuzzy Clustering...Enviado porRoberto González
- Autocatalytic Sets and the Growth of Complexity in an Evolutionary ModelEnviado porFahad Ahmad Khan
- 12723-42653-1-PB (1).pdfEnviado porAdan Figueroa
- ACSEnviado porcranker117
- Maths IBVPs 3Enviado porSsheshan Pugazhendhi
- Math 55 - 1st Long Exam ReviewEnviado porDaniel Santos
- 0779Enviado porRaghuRamaKrishnaSilla
- Notespacket - Macro IIEnviado porIgnacio Urbina Henríquez
- Maximum & Minimum Problems LagrangeEnviado porCarolina Torres Lozano Ψ
- Syllabus CE297 Statics Spring 2015Enviado porSandeep
- SCHMIDT Cap. 6 (Estabilidad Dinamica Longitudinal)Enviado porGabriel Ferrario
- Kundur Word Pequeña SeñalEnviado porJhonathan Iza
- 2.1 Solution Curves Without a SolutionEnviado porLynn Cheah
- A Parallel Algorithm for Computing the ExtremalEnviado porNurhanani abu bakar
- theory of elascity.docxEnviado porSimranAhluwalia
- Influence of Non-linearities on the Limits of Stability of Ships Rolling in Head SeasEnviado pormohdsolihat1
- AniEnviado porel
- Matrices NotesEnviado porFiras Diknash
- REE-Seminar.pdfEnviado porRatheesh Kumar

- NFEM.Ch25.pdfEnviado porstefan
- NFEMEnviado porrodlandi2750
- NFEM.Ch19.pdfEnviado porstefan
- NFEM.Ch17.pdfEnviado porstefan
- Review of Response to Gusting WindEnviado porstefan
- Topic_1Enviado porstefan
- NFEM.Q1.01.sol.pdfEnviado porstefan
- NFEM.Ch05Enviado porShubhankar Bhowmick
- Topic_6aEnviado porstefan
- Review of SDOFEnviado porstefan
- NFEM.Ch13.pdfEnviado porstefan
- nonfebk0Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-08Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-05Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-07Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-03Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-02Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-01Enviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-09.pdfEnviado porstefan
- Assgnmnt-06Enviado porstefan
- Topic_7Enviado porstefan
- Topic_6bEnviado porstefan
- Topic_6Enviado porstefan
- Topic_3Enviado porstefan
- Topic_4Enviado porstefan
- Topic_2Enviado porstefan
- Time Series Analysis ConceptsEnviado porstefan
- Review of Response to Harmonic and Random LoadsEnviado porstefan

- ccy_corEnviado pormako_to6182
- A Strategy for Real Power Control in a Direct-Drive PMSG Based WECSEnviado porSatyajit Das
- Wolfram Mathematica Core LanguageEnviado porsvarogus
- Quantum Entanglements NotesEnviado pormr_wops
- High-Speed Parallel Architectures for Linear.pdfEnviado porNava Krishnan
- V. QuadraticEnviado porkankirajesh
- FinalMath121BFall10 SolutionsEnviado pormstan11
- Performance Evaluation of Direction of Arrival Estimation Using MatlabEnviado porsipij
- EPM Theory ImplementationEnviado porkvpy26
- wireless intrusionEnviado porDivya Polavaram
- Min-Max TheoremEnviado porBrenden Ritola
- RECENT APPLICATIONS OF DESIGN OPTIMIZATION TO ROTORCRAFT|A SURVEYEnviado porrahpooye313
- GATE Engineering Mathematics MaterialEnviado pormanoj kaushik
- Kuet Ipe Full SyllabusEnviado porTamanna Kamal
- btech_syll_elec-instru_r2013-14.pdfEnviado porReeta Dutta
- GR1268 SolutionsEnviado porRG
- Matlab Tutorial of Modelling of a Slider Crank MechanismEnviado porTrolldaddy
- An Analysis of Stabilizing 3U CubeSats Using Gravity Gradient TecEnviado porFrank Ramirez
- JR - AHP & Theory of MeasurementEnviado porverdanto
- Lect_5Enviado porAshik Mahmud
- 1Enviado porDinizCarvalho
- Chapter 5 Rotor ModelingEnviado porewfsd
- 04. Aero_3Enviado porram
- Model Q Paper ESE 2017 GS EngggEnviado poranmol
- A Tutorial on Spectral ClusteringEnviado pormez007
- stybgchiEnviado porAman Kumar
- Practical Design Against Torsional Vibration Mark a. Corbo and Stanley B. Melanoski 199628032016Enviado pormfhaleem@pgesco.com
- Experiment No.1 (DSP Lab)Enviado porOmer Sheikh
- (164792880) AHP_TechniqueEnviado porvipul1947
- Robust Control System Design(2004).pdfEnviado porbaloochyb