Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
International Journal of
Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrmms
The damage mechanism of rock fatigue and its relationship to the fracture
toughness of rocks
N. Erarslan n, D.J. Williams
Golder Geomechanics Centre, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia
a r t i c l e i n f o abstract
Article history: This study presents the results of laboratory diametrical compression tests performed on Brisbane tuff
Received 26 August 2011 disc specimens to investigate their mode-I fracture toughness response to static and cyclic loading, as a
Received in revised form function of the applied load. Both the static and cyclic loading tests were carried out on Cracked
9 April 2012
Chevron Notched Brazilian Disc (CCNBD) rock specimens. Two different types of cyclic loading were
Accepted 24 July 2012
Available online 13 August 2012
applied: (a) cyclic loading with constant mean level and constant amplitude, termed sinusoidal cyclic
loading and (b) cyclic loading with increasing mean level and constant amplitude, termed increasing
Keywords: cyclic loading. The fracture toughness response to cyclic loading was found to be different from that
Rock fracture toughness under static loading in terms of the ultimate load and the damage mechanisms in front of the chevron
Rock fatigue
crack. A maximum reduction of the static fracture toughness (KIC) of 46% was obtained for the highest
Increasing cyclic loading
amplitude increasing cyclic loading test. Conversely, for sinusoidal cyclic loading, a maximum
CCNBD
SEM reduction of the static KIC of 29% was obtained. Detailed scanning electron microscope (SEM)
examinations revealed that both loading methods cause fatigue in the CCNBD specimens. When
compared with static rupture, the main difference with the cyclically loaded specimens was that
intergranular cracks were formed due to particle breakage under cyclic loading, SEM images showed
that fatigue damage in Brisbane tuff is strongly influenced by the failure of the matrix because of both
intergranular fracturing and transgranular fracturing.
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1365-1609/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.015
16 N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26
Brisbane tuff NST-62 25 0.26 190 15 2.2. Static and cyclic tests
(average of five repeats)
Brisbane tuff NST-35 19 0.22 97 8.0
(average of five repeats)
Disc specimens were diametrically loaded parallel to the
diametral compressive loading directions with a crack inclination
N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26 17
Fig. 2. (a) Sinusoidal cyclic loading and (b) increasing cyclic loading.
Table 4
The fracture toughness reduction due to cyclic loading: a comparison with static fracture toughness values.
Sample Amplitude Ultimate Number of cycles Mode-I stress Fracture toughness Reduction
pffiffiffiffiffi
% SUL load (kN) (N) up to failure intensity factor (KI)a (KIC)b (MPa m) of KIC (%)
pffiffiffiffiffi
(MPa m) [22]
a
a is assumed at 0.5.
b
Y nmin is assumed at 1.21.
Fig. 7. Failed specimens and damaged zone in front of the chevron tip (a) under static loading and (b) under cyclic loading.
Fig. 8. Load–CMOD plots of increasing cyclic loading with amplitudes (a) 10% SUL (0.45 kN), (b) 20% SUL (0.9 kN), (c) 30% SUL (1.35 kN) and (d) 40% SUL (1.8 kN).
strain in the specimen, rather than any significant decay in the as shown in Figs. 10 and 11 with different amplitudes. Plots of
material’s elastic modulus. Accumulation of plastic deformation is permanent damage show that both the CMOD and diametral axial
responsible for the fatigue damage; the magnitude and increasing displacement increase with increasing damage increments but at
trend of the irreversible deformation influences the cumulative different rates. Initially, irreversible CMOD deformation develops
fatigue damage. The displacements along both x and y directions quickly. This is followed by deformation increasing at a slow
represent CMOD and diametral axial displacement, respectively, constant rate before cumulative deformation begins to accelerate
N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26 21
Fig. 10. (a) CMOD and (b) diametral axial displacement versus number of cycles
plots: same mean increasing cyclic loading (type II) tests with amplitude 20% SUL
(0.9 kN)
Fig. 11. Diametral axial displacement and CMOD after the start of nonlinear deformation in front of the chevron crack tip.
Fig. 12. Debris and small particles in front of the tip of the chevron notch as a result of cyclic loading.
with small amounts of siderite (Fe-carbonate) and zeolite minerals. presented at greater magnification in Fig. 14a. At this scale,
Fig. 14 shows the fatigue-induced cracking around the quartz and intergranular cracking around the grains is apparent. Under closer
feldspar minerals. Fatigue-related microcracking around tuff miner- examination, fine fragments around the grains were observed,
als causing grain decohesion as a result of the pulling out of grains which accumulate in the proximity of the grain corners. This is
by frictional sliding is visible in Fig. 14c and d. Fig. 14b and e are particularly evident in Fig. 14e, from which it can be inferred that
N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26 23
Fig. 13. Fatigue damage in the cement of Brisbane tuff resulting from decohesion of microscale quartz minerals.
Fig. 14. Grain decohesion and loosened grains (a)–(e) and fatigue striations in damaged grains under high magnification ( 500) at the surface of the fatigue crack (f).
24 N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26
such powder is the result of fatigue damage, probably due to local work on stress corrosion crack growth in rocks and ceramics
abrasion of the sharp corners of the quartz and feldspar grains. use methods originally developed for determining fracture tough-
SEM imaging revealed that the primary fatigue damage ness in metallic materials. The corrosive environment is water
mechanisms in front of a chevron notch crack are grain decohe- and there is a chemically active environment in those metallic
sion and intergranular cracks. Debris and dust are the results of material experiments. However, some mechanisms have been
fatigue damage in Brisbane tuff cement and around loosened accepted as additional mechanisms of subcritical crack growth,
grains. The fatigue cracks in the cement are restricted around the such as cyclic fatigue [23,20]. In this research, it is believed that
grains and cannot grow through the grains. Therefore, it can be fatigue cracks (e.g. intergranular cracks) are the dominant mech-
deduced that those fatigue cracks are stable (subcritical) cracks anisms of subcritical crack propagation. Thus, the main aim here
that coalescence to form macroscale fatigue cracks resulting in is to discover the possible mechanisms in microcracks causing the
failure. Further, each grain after decohesion may behave as an corrosive environment. Therefore, direct observation of the FPZ in
indenter to indent the surface of the weaker cement material front of the tip of the main crack in the tested CCNBD specimens
under far field cyclic diametral compressive loading. This would using the SEM was found a suitable observation technique for this
explain the mechanisms of the debris material around and in the research.
corners of the loosened grains. To investigate possible differences between static and fatigue
failure, the fracture surfaces of monotonically tested CCNBD
specimens were also observed by SEM. Scanning electron micro-
4. Discussion graphs of fracture surfaces of Brisbane tuff CCNBD specimens
tested under monotonic loading are shown in Fig. 15. When
The fracture toughness response to cyclic loading was found to compared with static rupture, the main differences are: (1) the
be different from that under static loading in terms of the ultimate number of fragments produced is much greater under cyclic
load and the damage mechanisms in front of the chevron crack. A loading than under static loading and (2) intergranular cracks
maximum reduction of the static KIC of 46% was obtained for the are formed due to particle breakage under cyclic loading, whereas
highest amplitude dynamic cyclic loading tested. For sinusoidal smooth and bright cracks along cleavage planes are formed under
cyclic loading, a maximum reduction of the static KIC of 29% was static loading. Further, the macroscale main crack causing failure
obtained. These reductions clearly illustrate the dramatic effect of is seen in the cement without any dust or debris material under
cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of cracks in rocks. This monotonic loading. Typical sparkling cleavage cracks resulted
means that crack propagation and damage can take place under when rupture of the crystals occurred along cleavage planes.
lower than expected ultimate loads compared with static loading.
The mode I stress intensity factor KI at the crack tip is known to
control crack growth. The stress corrosion lower limit is Ko and the 5. Conclusions
fracture toughness is KIC. When KI 4KIC, the crack grows rapidly at
approximately the speed of sound, when KI oKo, the crack does not The fracture toughness response to cyclic loading was found to
grow and when Ko oKI oKIC, the crack grows at a certain velocity be different from that under static loading in terms of the
with the stress intensity factor KI. However, this research shows ultimate load and induced plastic displacement. The maximum
that unstable crack propagation causing failure occurs with lower reduction of the static KIC of 46% was obtained for the highest
KIs at the crack tip than the KIC value. This result contradicts the amplitude dynamic cyclic loading tested. For sinusoidal cyclic
classical theory, which predicts that there will be no crack growth loading, a maximum reduction of the static KIC of 27% was
as long as KI oKIC. This phenomenon is known as ‘subcritical crack obtained. These reductions clearly illustrate the dramatic effect
growth’ [26,27]. Subcritical crack growth is one of the main of cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of cracks in rocks.
explanations for the creep damage mechanism in rocks. In some Damage was quantified as the accumulation of permanent strain
fatigue research, damage accumulation in brittle materials under in front of the chevron notch crack tip with each cycle of loading,
cyclic loading has been explained by the creep mechanism and because microfracturing introduces nonlinearity into the theoreti-
stress corrosion [28,23,29]. Despite using different test geometries cally elastic behaviour of the rock. A continuous irreversible accu-
and loading boundary conditions to those were used in past studies, mulation of damage was observed in dynamic cyclic tests conducted
this study found similar damage behaviour in front of the notched at different amplitudes. After the accumulation of irreversible
crack in our disc shaped samples as a result of dilatant creep damage and failure of the specimen, clear tensile softening was
damage behaviour. It was possible to measure the crack growth observed in cyclic loading tests carried out at different amplitudes
rate for subcritical crack growth in other studies under controlled on vertically aligned chevron notch cracks (mode I). However, no
stress corrosive environments with edge-cracked specimens. How- post-peak behaviour was observed in the CCNBD specimens tested
ever, it is not possible to measure the crack growth rate in our cyclic under static loading. Considering the shape of the load–CMOD plots,
loading experiments because of the unknown stress corrosive the accumulation of irreversible damage in front of the chevron
mechanism and the high-speed unstable crack propagation due to notch crack under cyclic loading was found to be similar to static
the embedded notch crack in the disc specimens. Further, there was fatigue (creep). Further, the subcritical crack mechanisms were
no pre-existing crack for proper monitoring in our three-dimen- verified from rock-fatigue research, with lower ultimate loads
sional sample geometry because chevron notched specimens do not causing smaller KI than the KIC due to rock fatigue.
need to be pre-cracked for rock fracture research [19]. The SEM results enable some of the qualitative features of the
Stress corrosion is the most common mechanism associated fatigue damage process in Brisbane tuff to be inferred. This
with subcritical crack growth in rock. However, it is certainly not research found that the failure of a CCNBD specimen under cyclic
the only mechanism by which subcritical crack growth occurs. loading is the result of the coalescence of many microcracks, not
Another mechanism that can be important, in certain circum- of the growth of a single macrocrack. SEM images showed that
stances, is fatigue crack growth. In this study, it has been shown fatigue damage in Brisbane tuff is strongly influenced by the
that the N to failure decreased when the amplitude of cycles failure of the matrix because of both intergranular fracturing and
increased. This effect may also be explained by stress corrosion. transgranular fracturing. The main characteristic is particle break-
Stress corrosion and fatigue represent the major mechanisms of age under cyclic loading, which probably starts at contacts
subcritical crack growth in rocks [26,23]. Most of the experimental between particles and is accompanied by the production of very
N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26 25
Fig. 15. Damage in the cement and cleavage cracks under monotonic loading.
small fragments, probably resulting from frictional sliding within [3] Hoek E. Brittle fracture of rocks. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC, editors. Rock
the weak matrix. It is believed that point contacts at grain Mechanics in Engineering Practice. London: Wiley; 1968.
boundaries are regions of stress concentration (i.e. indenters). [4] Li YP, Chen LZ, Wang YH. Experimental research on pre-cracked marble under
Transgranular cracks may emanate from these regions and inter- compression. Int J Solids Struct 2005;42(9–10):2505–16.
[5] Al-Shayea NA. Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I–II
granular cracks sometimes pass through the contact points. This fracture. Eng Geol 2005;81(1):84–97.
stage can be correlated with a steady progression of damage and [6] Chang SH, Lee CI, Jeon S. Measurement of rock fracture toughness under
produces a general ‘loosening’ of the rock, which is a precursor to modes I and II and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens. Eng
the formation of intergranular cracks. When compared with static Geol 2002;66(1–2):79–97.
[7] Attawel PB, Farmer IW. Fatigue behavior of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min
rupture, the main differences are that a much greater number of
1973;10(1):1–9.
small particles and debris are created under cyclic loading than [8] Bagde MN, Pedros V. Fatigue properties of intact sandstone samples sub-
under static loading, and that intergranular cracks are formed due jected to dynamic uniaxial cyclical loading. Int J Rock Mech Min 2005;42(2):
to particle breakage under cyclic loading, whereas smooth and 237–50.
bright cracks are formed along cleavage planes under static [9] Gatelier N, Pellet F, Loret B. Mechanical damage of an anisotropic porous rock
in cyclic triaxial tests. Int J Rock Mech Min 2002;39(3):335–54.
loading. [10] Haimson BC, Kim CM. Mechanical behaviour of rock under cyclic fatigue.
Rock Mech 1971;3:845–63.
[11] Tao Z, Mo H. An experimental study and analysis of the behaviour of rock
Acknowledgements under cyclic loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1990;27:5.
[12] Burdine NT. Rock failure under dynamic failure conditions. Soc Pet Eng J
1963;3(1):1–8.
Acknowledgement is made to Leighton Contractors who pro- [13] Evans AG, Fuller ER. Crack propagation in ceramic materials under cyclic
vided core samples of Brisbane tuff from the CLEM7 Project and to loading conditions. Metall Trans 1974;5(1):27–9.
[14] Haimson BC. Effect of cyclic loading on rock. Dynamic Geotechnical Testing,
Ted Brown, Les McQueen, Mark Funkhauser and Rob Morphet of
654. ASTM STP; 1978 (p. 228–245).
Golder Associates Pty Ltd. for their assistance and advice. [15] Roxborough FF. Cutting rocks with picks. Min Eng 1963;132:445–52.
The work described forms part of the first author’s PhD research [16] Roxborough FF. Coal ploughing. Colliery Eng 1968;12(16):66–71.
carried out within the Golder Geomechanics Centre at The University [17] Hood M, Alehossein HA. Development in rock cutting technology. Int J Rock
Mech Min Sci 2000;37(1–2):297–305.
of Queensland. The first author was supported by an Australian
[18] Gottlieb L, Moore PJ. Vibratory cutting of brown coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
Postgraduate Award/UQRS and the Golder Geomechanics Centre. 1981;18:335–9.
[19] ISRM. Suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using
cracked chevron notched Brazilian disk (CCNBD) specimens. Int J Rock Mech
References Min Sci 1995;32(1):57–64.
[20] Kim K, Mubeen A. Relationship between differential stress intensity factor and
[1] Griffith AA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc crack growth rate in cyclic tension in Westerly granite. Fracture Mechanics
Lond 1920;221:163–98. Methods for Ceramics, Rocks, and Concrete, 745. ASTM STP; 1981 (p. 157–168).
[2] Lajtai EZ. A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the Griffith theory of [21] Singh SK. Fatigue and strain hardening behaviour of greywacke from the
brittle fracture. Tectonophysics 1971;11:129–56. flagstaff formation, NSW. Eng Geol 1989;26:171–9.
26 N. Erarslan, D.J. Williams / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 56 (2012) 15–26
[22] Shetty DK, Rosenfield AR, Duckworth WH. Fracture toughness of ceramics [26] Atkinson BK. Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. J Geophys Res
measured by a chevron notch diametral compression test. J Am Ceram Soc 1984;89:4077–114.
1985;68(12):C325–7. [27] Atkinson C, Smelser RE, Sanchez J. Combined mode fracture via the cracked
[23] Costin LS, Holcomb DJ. Time-dependent failure of rock under cyclic loading. Brazilian disk test. Int J Fract 1982;18(4):279–91.
Tectonophysics 1981;79(3–4):279–96. [28] Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA. Determination of rock fracture toughness under
[24] Hadley K. The effect of cyclic stress on dilatancy: another look. J Geophys Res creep and fatigue. In: Proceedings of the 35th US Rock Mechanics Sympo-
1976;81(14):2471–4. sium, Reno, 1995, p. 147–52.
[25] Dugdale DS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids [29] Evans AG. Fatigue in ceramics. Int J Fract 1980;16(6):485–98.
1960;8(2):100–4.