Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
113-116)
ISBN 978-979-18962-0-7 Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008
Design and built simple air sampling device for NO2, SO2, and NH3
from air ambient
Abstract
The increasing of human care to common air contamination caused the demanding of air analyzing
and air sampling devices increasingly. The purpose of this research is to make simple air sampling
device which are easy-handle and cheap. The stability of flow rate is the important element in this
assembly-device and to achieve that condition we could be used flow meter. The basic principle of
taking air sample using this device is by collecting contaminated air sample to trapped-solution in the
impinger-tube. Gas contaminant on the bubble-air will be react with the reagent in the trapped-
solution. Furthermore, the trapped-solution with contaminant inside is analyzed with instrumental
analyze method using spectrophotometer. The device is using three impingers to place NO2, SO2, and
NH3. Nitrogen dioxide is analyzed using Griezz Saltzman method, which the formed azo compound
measured at λ 525 nm. Sulphur dioxide is analyzed using Pararosanilline method, which the formed
complex is measured at λ 555 nm. Ammonia is analyzed using Nesller method, and its measured at λ
400 nm. From the test of this device compared with Lamotte® we acquired the difference
concentration of pollutant-sample aren’t much different.
113
D.I. Mulhaedi et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 113-116)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008
114
D.I. Mulhaedi et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 113-116)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008
The absorbing reagent is normally stable for 6 months. principle. Furthermore, the basic operating principle
And also prepared the supported reagents: sulfamic of this Orifice meter is based on the knowledge that
acid (o.6%); formaldehyde (0.2%); iodine solution the pressure drop across the meter is proportional to
(0.01 N); Sodium thiosulfate titrant (0.01 N); the square of the flow rate. In order to use this device
standardized sulfite solution; working sulfite-TCM for measurement it is necessary to empirically
solution; Pararosaniline reagent. The intensity of the calibrate them. That is, pass a known volume through
formed color is measured at wavelength 550nm. the meter and note the reading in order to provide a
standard for measuring other quantities. In this
Sampling and analysis for NH3 research, the Orifice meter can be measure the flow
rate until 1.5 L.min-1 and the precision of this Orifice
The method for sampling and analyzing of NH3 used is ±0.1L.min-1. So, this Orifice can be used as a flow
Nessler method. Ammonia will be reacted to form measurement in sampling of NO2, SO2, and NH3 from
colloid which its color is brown. Ammonia-nessler air ambient since to measure those parameter need a
measured using spectrophotometer at wavelength 400 flow rate until 1.5 L.min-1 (SNI, 2005).
nm. Nessler’s reagent is prepared by dissolving 70 g
of potassium iodide in about 75 ml of deionized water.
A saturated solution of mercuric chloride (HgCl2) is Comparison assembly device with Lamotte® air
added until a slight turbidity persists. Then added 160 sampling device
g sodium hydroxide in 150 ml deionized water
carefully and the solution is made up to 1 liter, and A comparison between assembly device and Lamotte®
allowed to stand overnight in a dark place. air sampling device (figure 2) was carried out in
Gasibu court, Bandung-West Java. And the result
Experimental design showed that there wasn’t any significant difference of
the determining pollutants sample which is NO2, SO2,
In this research, a comparison between assembly- and NH3 from air ambient (Table 1). Sampling for
device and commercial device (Lamotte®) was carried each parameter was carried out three times at the same
out in sampling air ambient for gas NO2, SO2, and day. And both of these device (Assembly device and
NH3 at Supratman St. (Gasibu court). The assembly- Lamotte®) were carried out sampling pollutant at the
device and Lamotte® air sampling device were carried same spot at the same time. We made assumption that
out in the same place and time. We made assumption the condition of these two device are same.
that both of them take a same condition during taking
pollutant from air ambient (flow rate, temperature,
pressure, height, position, etc.). The next step was
both of assembly-device and Lamotte® air sampling
115
D.I. Mulhaedi et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 113-116)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008
Table 1 Comparison between assembly device and Caulcutt, R and R. Boddy. 1983. Statistics of
Lamotte® Air Sampling Device carried out Analytical Chemist. Chapman and Hall. New
sampling of (a) nitrogen dioxide (NO2), (b) York.
sulphur dioxide (SO2), and (c) ammonia Sawyer, C.N. and Mc Carty, P.L. 1994. Chemistry for
(NH3) at Gasibu Court, Bandung-Indonesia Environmental Engineering. Mc Graw Hill Book
Co. 4th edition, New York.
Average 1
Concentration SNI 19-7119.6-2005. Udara Ambien-Bagian 6:
absorbance of
Device A of NO2 Penentuan lokasi pengambilan contoh uji
NO2
0.059 pemantauan kualitas udara ambien. Badan
0.076 ppm Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta
Lamotte® 0.085 0187
±0.0127
0.043
0.068
Assembly 0.086 ppm
0.091 0.210
device ±0.0130
0.051
(a)
Average
Concentration
absorbance of
Device A of SO2
SO2
1.052
1.427 ppm
Lamotte® 1.498 1.507
±0.0253
1.520
1.493
Assembly 1.416 ppm
1.482 1.495
device ±0.0252
1.510
(b)
Average
Concentration of
absorbance
Device A NH3
of NH3
0.480
1.023 ppm
Lamotte® 0.441 0.4423
±0.177
0.406
0.422
Assembly 1.098 ppm
0.403 0.4123
device ±0.181
0.412
(c)
.
Acknowledgements
This work partially supported by Student Creativity
Project of DIKTI (PKM DIKTI) 2008. We would like
to thanks Prof. Muljadji Agma for beneficial
discussion.
References
Agustini, T., A. Dunawan., & S. Imamkhasani. 2005.
Pembuatan Peralatan Sampling Gas Dalam Udara
Ambient. In Warta Kimia Analitik LIPI 14: 7-10
Breysse, N. Patrick. & Peter S.J. Lees. 1999. Air
Sampling for Gases and Vapors. John Hopkins
University
116