1.

Hubungan pengetahuan dengan sikap

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengetahuan * sikap 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pengetahuan * sikap Crosstabulation

sikap

positif negatif Total

pengetahuan baik Count 42 2 44

Expected Count 38.5 5.5 44.0

% within pengetahuan 95.5% 4.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 33.3% 91.7%

% of Total 87.5% 4.2% 91.7%

buruk Count 0 4 4

Expected Count 3.5 .5 4.0

% within pengetahuan .0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within sikap .0% 66.7% 8.3%

% of Total .0% 8.3% 8.3%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within pengetahuan 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
 Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 30.545a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 22.442 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 19.898 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 29.909 1 .000

N of Valid Casesb 48

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.a

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .624 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .798 .126 8.972 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .798 .126 8.972 .000c

N of Valid Cases 48

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

2. Hubungan pengalaman hipotermi dengan sikap

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengalamanhipotermi * sikap 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pengalamanhipotermi * sikap Crosstabulation

 sikap

positif negatif Total

pengalamanhipotermi pernah Count 6 0 6

Expected Count 5.2 .8 6.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within sikap 14.3% .0% 12.5%

% of Total 12.5% .0% 12.5%

tidak pernah Count 36 6 42

Expected Count 36.8 5.2 42.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

% within sikap 85.7% 100.0% 87.5%

% of Total 75.0% 12.5% 87.5%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .980a 1 .322

Continuity Correctionb .109 1 .741

Likelihood Ratio 1.720 1 .190

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .427

Linear-by-Linear Association .959 1 .327

N of Valid Casesb 48

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,75.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

3. Hubungan usia dengan sikap

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

usia * sikap 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

usia * sikap Crosstabulation

sikap

positif negatif Total

usia 14-20 Count 22 4 26

Expected Count 22.8 3.2 26.0

% within usia 84.6% 15.4% 100.0%

% within sikap 52.4% 66.7% 54.2%

% of Total 45.8% 8.3% 54.2%

21-30 Count 17 1 18

Expected Count 15.8 2.2 18.0

% within usia 94.4% 5.6% 100.0%

% within sikap 40.5% 16.7% 37.5%

% of Total 35.4% 2.1% 37.5%

31-40 Count 1 1 2

Expected Count 1.8 .2 2.0

% within usia 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within sikap 2.4% 16.7% 4.2%

% of Total 2.1% 2.1% 4.2%

41-50 Count 2 0 2

Expected Count 1.8 .2 2.0

% within usia 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within sikap 4.8% .0% 4.2%

 % of Total 4.2% .0% 4.2%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.849a 3 .278

Likelihood Ratio 3.348 3 .341

Linear-by-Linear Association .081 1 .776

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 6 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,25.
4. Hubungan pendidikan dengan sikap

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendidikan * sikap 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pendidikan * sikap Crosstabulation

sikap

positif negatif Total

pendidikan SD Count 1 0 1

Expected Count .9 .1 1.0

% within pendidikan 100.0% .0% 100.0%

 % within sikap 2.4% .0% 2.1%

% of Total 2.1% .0% 2.1%

SMP Count 8 3 11

Expected Count 9.6 1.4 11.0

% within pendidikan 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%

% within sikap 19.0% 50.0% 22.9%

% of Total 16.7% 6.2% 22.9%

SMA Count 24 3 27

Expected Count 23.6 3.4 27.0

% within pendidikan 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

% within sikap 57.1% 50.0% 56.2%

% of Total 50.0% 6.2% 56.2%

PT Count 9 0 9

Expected Count 7.9 1.1 9.0

% within pendidikan 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within sikap 21.4% .0% 18.8%

% of Total 18.8% .0% 18.8%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within pendidikan 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.671a 3 .299

Likelihood Ratio 4.442 3 .218

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.364 1 .124

N of Valid Cases 48
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.671a 3 .299

Likelihood Ratio 4.442 3 .218

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.364 1 .124

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,13.
5. Hubungan jumlah pendakian dengan sikap

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendakianke * sikap 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pendakianke * sikap Crosstabulation

sikap

positif negatif Total

pendakianke 1x Count 10 0 10

Expected Count 8.8 1.2 10.0

% within pendakianke 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within sikap 23.8% .0% 20.8%

% of Total 20.8% .0% 20.8%

2-3x Count 9 2 11

Expected Count 9.6 1.4 11.0

% within pendakianke 81.8% 18.2% 100.0%

% within sikap 21.4% 33.3% 22.9%

% of Total 18.8% 4.2% 22.9%

4->4x Count 23 4 27

Expected Count 23.6 3.4 27.0

 % within pendakianke 85.2% 14.8% 100.0%

% within sikap 54.8% 66.7% 56.2%

% of Total 47.9% 8.3% 56.2%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within pendakianke 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.886a 2 .390

Likelihood Ratio 3.087 2 .214

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.016 1 .313

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1,25.

6. Hubungan jumlah pendakian dengan pengetahuan

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendakianke * pengetahuan 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pendakianke * pengetahuan Crosstabulation

pengetahuan

baik buruk Total

pendakianke 1x Count 10 0 10

Expected Count 9.2 .8 10.0

% within pendakianke 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 22.7% .0% 20.8%

% of Total 20.8% .0% 20.8%

2-3x Count 9 2 11

Expected Count 10.1 .9 11.0

% within pendakianke 81.8% 18.2% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 20.5% 50.0% 22.9%

% of Total 18.8% 4.2% 22.9%

4->4x Count 25 2 27

Expected Count 24.8 2.2 27.0

% within pendakianke 92.6% 7.4% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 56.8% 50.0% 56.2%

% of Total 52.1% 4.2% 56.2%

Total Count 44 4 48

Expected Count 44.0 4.0 48.0

% within pendakianke 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.336a 2 .311

Likelihood Ratio 2.846 2 .241

Linear-by-Linear Association .141 1 .707

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,83.
7. Hubungan pendidikan dengan pengetahuan

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendidikan * pengetahuan 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

pendidikan * pengetahuan Crosstabulation

pengetahuan

baik buruk Total

pendidikan SD Count 1 0 1

Expected Count .9 .1 1.0

% within pendidikan 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 2.3% .0% 2.1%

% of Total 2.1% .0% 2.1%

SMP Count 9 2 11

Expected Count 10.1 .9 11.0

% within pendidikan 81.8% 18.2% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 20.5% 50.0% 22.9%

% of Total 18.8% 4.2% 22.9%

SMA Count 25 2 27

Expected Count 24.8 2.2 27.0

% within pendidikan 92.6% 7.4% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 56.8% 50.0% 56.2%

% of Total 52.1% 4.2% 56.2%

PT Count 9 0 9

Expected Count 8.2 .8 9.0

% within pendidikan 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 20.5% .0% 18.8%

 % of Total 18.8% .0% 18.8%

Total Count 44 4 48

Expected Count 44.0 4.0 48.0

% within pendidikan 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.336a 3 .506

Likelihood Ratio 2.846 3 .416

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.504 1 .220

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,08.

8. Hubungan usia dengan pengetahuan

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

usia * pengetahuan 48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%

usia * pengetahuan Crosstabulation

pengetahuan

baik buruk Total

usia 14-20 Count 23 3 26

Expected Count 23.8 2.2 26.0

 % within usia 88.5% 11.5% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 52.3% 75.0% 54.2%

% of Total 47.9% 6.2% 54.2%

21-30 Count 18 0 18

Expected Count 16.5 1.5 18.0

% within usia 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 40.9% .0% 37.5%

% of Total 37.5% .0% 37.5%

31-40 Count 1 1 2

Expected Count 1.8 .2 2.0

% within usia 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 2.3% 25.0% 4.2%

% of Total 2.1% 2.1% 4.2%

41-50 Count 2 0 2

Expected Count 1.8 .2 2.0

% within usia 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 4.5% .0% 4.2%

% of Total 4.2% .0% 4.2%

Total Count 44 4 48

Expected Count 44.0 4.0 48.0

% within usia 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.713a 3 .082

Likelihood Ratio 6.167 3 .104

Linear-by-Linear Association .051 1 .821

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.713a 3 .082

Likelihood Ratio 6.167 3 .104

Linear-by-Linear Association .051 1 .821

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 6 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,17.
9. Hubungan pengalaman hiootermi dengan pengetahuan

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengalamanhipotermi *
48 100.0% 0 .0% 48 100.0%
pengetahuan

pengalamanhipotermi * pengetahuan Crosstabulation

pengetahuan

baik buruk Total

pengalamanhipotermi pernah Count 6 0 6

Expected Count 5.5 .5 6.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 13.6% .0% 12.5%

% of Total 12.5% .0% 12.5%

tidak pernah Count 38 4 42

Expected Count 38.5 3.5 42.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 86.4% 100.0% 87.5%

% of Total 79.2% 8.3% 87.5%

Total Count 44 4 48

Expected Count 44.0 4.0 48.0

% within pengalamanhipotermi 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within pengetahuan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .623a 1 .430

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio 1.119 1 .290

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .575

Linear-by-Linear Association .610 1 .435

N of Valid Casesb 48

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

10. Hubungan pendidikan dengan pengetahuan

Crosstab

sikap

positif negatif Total

pendidikan SD Count 1 0 1

Expected Count .9 .1 1.0

% within sikap 2.4% .0% 2.1%

SMP Count 8 3 11

Expected Count 9.6 1.4 11.0

% within sikap 19.0% 50.0% 22.9%

SMA Count 24 3 27

Expected Count 23.6 3.4 27.0

 % within sikap 57.1% 50.0% 56.2%

PT Count 9 0 9

Expected Count 7.9 1.1 9.0

% within sikap 21.4% .0% 18.8%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.671a 3 .299

Likelihood Ratio 4.442 3 .218

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.364 1 .124

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is ,13.
11. jumlah pendakian dengan pengetahuan

Crosstab

sikap

positif negatif Total

pendakianke 1x Count 10 0 10

Expected Count 8.8 1.2 10.0

% within sikap 23.8% .0% 20.8%

2-3x Count 9 2 11

Expected Count 9.6 1.4 11.0

% within sikap 21.4% 33.3% 22.9%

4->4x Count 23 4 27

Expected Count 23.6 3.4 27.0

% within sikap 54.8% 66.7% 56.2%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.886a 2 .390

Likelihood Ratio 3.087 2 .214

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.016 1 .313

N of Valid Cases 48

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1,25.
12. Hubungan pengalaman hipotermi dengan pengetahuan

Crosstab

sikap

positif negatif Total

pengalamanhipotermi pernah Count 6 0 6

Expected Count 5.2 .8 6.0

% within sikap 14.3% .0% 12.5%

tidak pernah Count 36 6 42

Expected Count 36.8 5.2 42.0

% within sikap 85.7% 100.0% 87.5%

Total Count 42 6 48

Expected Count 42.0 6.0 48.0

% within sikap 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
 Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .980a 1 .322

Continuity Correctionb .109 1 .741

Likelihood Ratio 1.720 1 .190

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .427

Linear-by-Linear Association .959 1 .327

N of Valid Casesb 48

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,75.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table