Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
15 Defendants.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case 2:19-at-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/27/19 Page 2 of 6
1
2 Plaintiff, demanding a jury trial, brings this civil rights action against Defendants
3 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY STEPHEN
4 MICHAEL BUCCELLATO, and DOES 1-25, inclusive, for general, consequential,
5 compensatory, punitive and statutory damages, costs and attorneys’ fees resulting from
6 defendants’ unconstitutional and tortious conduct, and therefore allege as follows:
7 I. PARTIES
8 1. Plaintiff Scanvinski Hymes, is an individual who is currently an inmate housed in the
9 San Francisco County Jail in San Francisco Ca.
10 2. Defendant Sacramento County is a legal entity established under the laws of the State of
11 California with all the powers specified and necessarily implied by the Constitution and laws of
12 the State of California. Sacramento County is a municipality located within the Eastern District
13 of California.
14 3. Defendant Sacramento County Sheriff’s Deputy Stephen Michael Buccellato is an
15 individual and was employed by the Sheriffs Office of Sacramento County at all times relevant
16 to this complaint. This Defendant is being sued in his individual capacity.
17 4. Defendant Does 1-25 are defendants whose capacities are unknown to Plaintiffs, but
18 upon ascertaining these individuals identities, the Plaintiffs will seek leave to amend to name
19 these people as defendants in this case.
20 5. All defendants acted under the color of law as it pertains to this complaint.
21 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
22 6. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988 and 12132 and the Fourteenth
23 Amendment to the United States Constitution. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims
24 under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a).
25 7. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the events giving rise
26 to this action occurred in Sacramento County, which is located in the Eastern District.
27
28
2
Case 2:19-at-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/27/19 Page 3 of 6
3
Case 2:19-at-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/27/19 Page 4 of 6
1 16. That during the time that the Plaintiff was not secured in a seatbelt, the Defendant
2 Stephen Michael Buccellato operated the transport vehicle carrying the Plaintiff in a reckless
3 manner.
4 17. That as a result of the Defendant operating the transport vehicle carrying the Plaintiff in a
5 reckless manner, they were involved in an auto collision.
6 18. That as result of the Plaintiff not being secured in a seatbelt in combination with the
7 Defendant operating the transport vehicle in a reckless manner, the Plaintiff was thrown with
8 great force inside of the transport vehicle, causing him to suffer severe injuries to his back.
9 19. Defendant Stephen Michael Buccellato exhibited deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s
10 constitutional rights in that Defendant knew of the dangerous condition that the Plaintiff was
11 placed in by the Defendant not securing him in a seatbelt and driving in a reckless manner, knew
12 of the risk of danger those conditions posed, and failed to take any corrective action to remedy
13 those conditions.
14 20. The acts of Defendant constituted a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
15 Constitution of the United States.
16 21. Plaintiff suffered damages, including physical and emotional injury, as a result of the
17 Defendant’s acts.
18 22. The foregoing violation of Scanvinski Hymes’ constitutional rights occurred as the result
19 of the deliberate, reckless, and malicious acts, omissions, and practices of the Sacramento
20 County Sheriff’s Department. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Sacramento County has
21 sanctioned and ratified its sheriff’s deputies’ actions to engage in the deliberate indifference to
22 Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, including in this case; failed to train and supervise its deputies
23 properly to ensure they transport pre-trial detainees under the color of the law; and acted with
24 deliberate indifference in failing to properly train its deputies or to adopt policies necessary to
25 prevent such constitutional violations.
26 23. The conduct of the named Defendant as alleged, was done in conscious disregard of
27 Plaintiff’s rights and safety and thus constitutes malice.
28
4
Case 2:19-at-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/27/19 Page 5 of 6
1 24. Because the above acts were performed in a malicious, and/or oppressive manner,
2 Plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages from the named Defendants Officers in an
3 amount according to proof.
4 SECOND CLAIM
5 (Negligence Claim – As to all Defendants and Does 1-25)
6 25. By virtue of the foregoing, Defendant Stephen Michael Buccellato owed Plaintiff a duty
7 of due care not to cause the Plaintiff to be placed in dangerous conditions, and that this duty was
8 breached by the Defendant when he failed to secure the Plaintiff in a seatbelt, and operated the
9 transport vehicle carrying the Plaintiff in a reckless manner.
10 26. That as a direct and proximate cause of the aforementioned acts of Defendant, Plaintiff
11 was injured as set forth above and is entitled to compensatory damages according to proof at the
12 time of trial.
13 27. Defendant is liable for all injuries caused by their acts, to the same extent as a private
14 person pursuant to California Government Code Section 820(a).
15 28. Defendant as public employee is not exonerated or immune from liability for negligence
16 for causing the Plaintiff to suffer harm pursuant to California Government Code Section 820.8.
17
18 (Vicarious Liability – As to City and County of San Francisco)
19 29. Because the Defendant Stephen Michael Buccellato was acting as an employee of
20 Sacramento County at the time of the incident, and because he were acting within the scope and
21 course of his employment and under the direct control and supervision of Sacramento County,
22 Sacramento County is liable to the Plaintiff for negligence pursuant to California Government
23 Code §815.2.
24
25
26
27
28
5
Case 2:19-at-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/27/19 Page 6 of 6
6
JS 44 (Rev. 08/16) CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
Case
provided by local rules of court. This 2:19-at-00321
form, approved Document
by the Judicial Conference 1-1 States
of the United Filed 04/27/19
in September Pagefor1 the
1974, is required ofuse
2 of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff San Francisco County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
Stanley Goff, Esq. SBN 289564 (415-571-9570)
15 Boardman Place,
San Francisco, Ca 94103
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
’ 1 U.S. Government ’ 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State ’ 1 ’ 1 Incorporated or Principal Place ’ 4 ’ 4
of Business In This State
’ 2 U.S. Government ’ 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State ’ 2 ’ 2 Incorporated and Principal Place ’ 5 ’ 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. lace an in t e appropriate o . f t ere are multiple nature of suit codes associated it t e case pic t e nature of suit code
t at is most applica le. Clic ere for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.