Você está na página 1de 2

» PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

The Legacy of George S. Axelby

ur Society lost one of its dear George Axelby was a member of torial board provided the reviews of

O friends and pioneers this past


June. George S. Axelby died in
his home after a prolonged illness.
the administrative committee of the
PGAC, corresponding to our current
Board of Governors, and he was
the submissions. As submissions
grew, Axelby organized the editorial
board as overseers of our current peer
George Axelby was a graduate of the Transactions editor. In his editorial in review system, trained the associate
University of Connecticut and Yale the first issue, he editors, and created
and worked for Westinghouse in its wrote “Radio and the information dis-
Aerospace Division in Baltimore, electronic engineers semination commit-
Maryland. He was the founding editor were among those tee for editorial board
of IEEE Transactions on Automatic Con- who created new the- meetings where
trol in 1956 and the founding editor of ories and developed acceptance decisions
the IFAC journal Automatica in 1968. more advanced feed- were made. Axelby
He was a member of the first group of back circuits…and a retained his position
recipients of the IEEE Control Systems new trend is devel- as editor through
Society Distinguished Member Award oping—all of the June of 1968, when he
in 1983, a recipient of the IFAC Out- complex marvels, the retired to the position
standing Service Award, and a Fellow radar, the television, of consulting editor.
of the IEEE. However, this brief sum- the computer, each One of the main
mary barely touches on the impact containing internal reasons for George
that George Axelby had on our field. feedback control Axelby’s reduced
We have George Axelby’s first loops, are being com- involvement with the
issue of IRE Transactions on Automatic bined into over-all automatic control Transactions was his interest in pro-
Control, volume 1, issue 1, May 1956, systems.” George Axelby foresaw the moting control in the international
in IEEE Xplore. Back then, we were growth in our field, as he succinctly control systems community. IFAC was
part of the Institute of Radio Engi- stated: “In the future automatic con- looking to develop an international
neers (IRE), which merged in 1963 trol will become more complex; it will journal focused on automatic control
with the smaller American Institute encompass broader fields. There will and was interested in converting the
of Electrical Engineers to form the be a greater need for developing and journal Automatica, published by Perg-
current IEEE. Our Control Systems incorporating new theories, tech- amon Press, into an IFAC journal. In
Society (CSS) was known as the Pro- niques, and components into inte- 1968, these two organizations
fessional Group on Automatic Con- grated systems.” approached the one prominent editor
trol (PGAC), which was formed on George Axelby recognized the in the control field, George Axelby, to
October 5, 1954. PGAC was formed as potential breadth of the field and the become the editor of Automatica and
a means to disseminate information role of quality publications in advanc- convinced him to accept the challenge
about automatic control, its related ing the field. He created standards for of developing another quality interna-
interests, its problems, and its devel- paper submission and instituted the tional publication in the control field.
opments. The charter of PGAC was to foundations of our peer review sys- George Axelby soon realized that he
organize national group symposia tem, forming an editorial board to had no editorial board or associate
and technical sessions, local profes- evaluate contributions for possible editors, so he set out to replicate the
sional chapters, and to publish IRE publication. In his words, “the Trans- editorial structure of the successful
Transactions on Automatic Control. This actions is the medium where this IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
charter has not changed much over information is distributed; it is the He recruited a new international edi-
the past 54 years. agent where new problems and devel- torial board, one of whom was Huib-
opments can be proposed.” In the ert Kwakernaak, and set out to find
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MCS.2008.927954 early days of the Transactions, the edi- suitable papers. He had the IFAC

10 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE » OCTOBER 2008


symposia papers as potential sources, tion technology in support of our publi- To George, a good applications
but they had to be peer reviewed by cations, as the primary developer of the paper, “in addition to giving a descrip-
referees selected by the associate edi- paper submission and review system tion of the system and its particular
tors. The first issue of the new IFAC Pampus that was used by Automatica features of interest, should contain the
journal Automatica appeared in Jan- and as the codeveloper (with Pradeep evolution of the control design: its pur-
uary, 1969. To date, Automatica re- Misra) of our PaperPlaza conference pose and desired performance, the the-
mains one of the leading journals in submission and publication system. ory on which it was based, the reasons
the control field (the latest citation George Axelby’s last issue as editor- for choosing the types of mechaniza-
impact factors for controls journals has in-chief of Automatica was the 150th tion and the problems of realizing it,
Automatica second after IEEE Transac- issue under his watch. In this issue, he and finally, some measurements of
tions on Automatic Control.). comments on the evolution of Automat- actual system performance…” These
George guided Automatica through ica from an applications-oriented jour- standards are still the guidelines for
the growth years in our field in the nal toward a journal of control theory. publications in our IEEE Transactions
1970s. By 1979, it was clear that the Of the early issues, he states “there on Control Systems Technology as well as
breadth of systems and control were no theorems, lemmas, or proofs, many of our technical articles in IEEE
research required an adaptation of the as most papers do today… there was Control Systems Magazine.
editorial structure. He designed a new less concentration on mathematical CSS annually awards the George S.
editorial structure for Automatica to aspects than there was on creating Axelby Outstanding Paper Award to
distribute responsibilities by appoint- algorithms for solving practical appli- recognize outstanding papers pub-
ing area editors and changing the cations problems.” He noted a similar lished in IEEE Transactions on Automat-
position of editor to editor-in-chief. A transformation in IEEE Transactions on ic Control during the two preceding
similar structure was eventually Automatic Control, as he mentions in years. This award was established in
adopted by IEEE Transactions on Auto- another of his editorials on the subject 1975 and is one of our most presti-
matic Control nearly a decade later. of application papers: “it is extremely gious Society awards. George S. Axelby
George remained as editor-in-chief of difficult to define an applications paper is also listed in our IEEE Transactions
Automatica until 1993, when interest in particularly in the control field where a on Automatic Control editorial board as
Automatica increased its publication fre- mathematical theory is often applied to the founding editor of the journal.
quency from six issues per year to solve a hypothetical control problem.” As our Society nears its 55th year
monthly. He was recognized by IFAC as He expected that, as the field matured, of operation, many of our pioneers
editor-in-chief emeritus and was suc- more applications papers would be are no longer active in our activities
ceeded by Huibert Kwakernaak, who published because control theory or in the control field. Their vision
was then deputy editor-in-chief, as the would evolve to the point where it and their efforts led to the creation of
new editor-in-chief. I would be remiss should be verified by applications. He our Society and our excellent publi-
not to mention the significant contribu- foresaw the need for balance in our cations. Our thanks go to George S.
tions of Huibert to our Society, as a key publications between theory and appli- Axelby for his crucial and inspira-
member of the editorial staff during cations and concluded that “Without tional role in developing the founda-
George’s 25 years and editor-in-chief of eventual application to the physical tions of today’s CSS.
Automatica for over a decade afterwards. world, control theory would stagnate David A. Castañón
Huibert pioneered the use of informa- and become meaningless.”

Worse Is Better
ecall, if you will, the trends of steam engine development as the nineteenth century wore
R on: increased flyball mass, better-engineered components and consequently reduced fric-
tion, faster engines and therefore smaller flywheel moments, striving toward astatic operation
and so reduced nonuniformity. Each and all of these trends led away from stable operations.
The puzzling increase in hunting behavior was now as clear as day. Simple changes could be
made to turn disgruntled and wayward factory engines into well-behaved workers: don’t oil
the governor, and replace the flyballs with smaller ones. In the long run better engine designs
prevailed, and new governors were developed that took account of Vyshnegradskii’s words.

—M. Denny, Ingenium: Five Machines That Changed the World.


Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 2007, p. 154.

12 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE » OCTOBER 2008

Você também pode gostar