Você está na página 1de 51

INFORMATION PAPER

RETROFITTING WITH
NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

September 1994

OzonAction Information Clearinghouse


OzonAction Programme

Industry and Environment


RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

DISCLAIMER
This preliminary document is provided by the United Nations Environment Programme's
Industry and Environment (UNEP IE) as an information paper on retrofitting with non-CFC
substitutes in refrigeration sector. The paper presents abstracts/summaries of studies concern-
ing retrofitting of domestic refrigeration, mobile air conditioning (MAC), centrifugal chillers,
cold storage and food processing facilities, and commercial refrigeration. Some of the abstract
summaries are extracted directly from the source cited. Others, however, have been edited to
improve clarity of the extract, or to target the key points relevant to the subject of this paper.

In furnishing the information contained in this document, UNEP does not make any warranty
or representation, either express or implied, with respect to its accuracy, completeness or utility;
nor does UNEP assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from the use of, reliance
upon, any information, material, or procedure contained herein, including but not limited to any
claims regarding health, safety, environmental effects or fate, efficacy, or performance, made
by the source of the information.

Mention of any company, association, individual, or product in this preliminary list is for
informational purposes only, and does not constitute a recommendation of any such company,
association, individual, or product, either express or implied by UNEP.

Trade Marks
All products mentioned in this list are trademarks of their respective companies.

Updates
This is a "living" document that will be updated on a regular basis. If you know any paper or
information sources that should be included in the future versions, please send the information
to UNEP IE.

UNEP IE
Attn: Mr. Rajendra M. Shende
Tour Mirabeau
39 - 43 quai André Citroën
73759 Paris Cedex 15
France

REVIEW
The information in this document has been reviewed by:

Dr. Lambert Kuijpers, Co-Chair, UNEP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel; Co-
Chair, UNEP Refrigeration, Air-Conditioning, and Heat Pumps Technical Options Com-
mittee.

1
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Dr. Lindsey Roke, Member of UNEP Refrigeration, Air-Conditioning, and Heat Pumps
Technical Options Committee.

Ms. Trude Tokle, consultant, UNEP IE OzonAction Programme.

2
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

CONTENTS

Background

Retrofit study information

Summaries/abstracts of studies made on retrofitting, highlighting benefits and problems


Domestic Refrigeration
Mobile Air Conditioning
Centrifugal Chillers
Cold Storage and Food Processing
Commercial Refrigeration
Retrofit in general

Appendices
A. Bibliography
B. List of organizations undertaking work on retrofitting
C. Guidelines for Automotive Air Conditioning Retrofit. Mobile Air Conditioning Society,
MACS 1994, Convention Issue, Sahara Hotel Las Vegas, USA.

3
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

BACKGROUND
What is retrofit in the field of refrigeration?
Retrofit is the process by which the equipment currently using an ODS refrigerant is made to
run on a non-ODS refrigerant, without major effects on the performance of the equipment, and
without significant modifications/changes for the equipment, ensuring that existing equipment
operates until the end of its economic life.

Why retrofit
Imminent CFC-shortages would threaten the useful life of the appliances of CFC-equipment.
As CFC shortages increase, the cost of CFCs will rise, along with operating costs of the
equipment. Retrofit refrigerants and technology are available for most applications. By
retrofitting the equipment, you enable it to operate past the CFC's phase-out dead lines, and the
equipment lifetime exceeds the phase-out dates.

Existing plants which have reached the end of their economic lifetime, should be replaced with
new refrigeration equipment based on non-ODS refrigerants and technologies.

This document
The Executive Committee of Multilateral Fund in its 10th meeting decided to defer all
retrofitting projects pending an assessment report by OORG (Ozone Operations Resource
Group) on the status of retrofit, cost, reliability, cost effectiveness, and comparative benefits.

This document is based on information available at the OAIC (OzonAction Information Clearing
House) of UNEP IE/PAC.

It is expected to provide assistance to Article 5 countries in assessing various options, and to


provide input to the process of formulation of proposed strategic options (to be formulated by
the Secretariat and other implementing agencies) to enable the Executive Committee to take a
policy decision on the subject.

RETROFIT STUDY INFORMATION


Retrofit study involves the joint effort by equipment manufacturer, equipment owner, service
agency, refrigerant manufacturer and research institute.

Study and experiments on retrofitting have to address the following problems:

Technical
i) Pressure and temperature level, performance and capacity
ii) Compatibility of lubricants and refrigerants with construction, sealing and insulation
materials
iii) Refrigerant and lubricant solubility (eg. capillary tube plugging)
iv) Chemical and humidity residues and their impact on lubricants, refrigerants, materials
and operation performance

4
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

v) Storage/handling of lubricants and refrigerants, with regard to moisture interaction


vi) Redesign of compressor and other components
vii) Field tests/reliability

Others
vii) Time consumption for retrofitting
viii) Cost of retrofitting (equipment, lubricant, refrigerant)

Typical retrofit may involve one or many of the following changes/justifications:


 Lubricant
 Desiccant filter (dryer)
 Expansion valve
 Compressor (gearbox, speed, motor)
 Insulation and seal materials, elastomers
For centrifugal chillers: purge systems, impeller/gearbox

5
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Possible refrigerant candidates for retrofit

Replace- Pure compounds Blends % ASHRAE Example of trade names


ment for

CFC-11 HCFC-123

CFC-12 HCFC-22 HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HCFC-142b 60/25/15 (FX56)

HFC-134a HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HCFC-142b 65/25/10 (FX57)

HFC-152a HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HFC-152a 52/33/15 R-401a (SUVA MP39)

HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HFC-152a 61/28/11 R-401b (SUVA MP66)

HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HFC-152a 33/52/15 R-401c (SUVA MP52)

HCFC-22/600a/HCFC-142b 55/4/41 R-406a (GHG)

R-290/R-600a (propane/isobutane) 50/50

7
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Replace- Pure compounds Blends % ASHRAE Example of trade names


ment for

R-502 HCFC-22 HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HCFC-142b 65/25/10 (FX57)

HFC-134a HCFC-22/HFC-143a/HFC-125 47/46/7 (FX10)

HCFC-22/HFC-125/R-290 38/60/2 R-402a (SUVA HP80)

HCFC-22/HFC-125/R-290 60/38/2 R-402b (SUVA HP81)

HCFC-22/R-218/R-290 75/20/5 R-403a (Isceon 69S)

HCFC-22/R-218/R-290 56/39/5 R-403b (Isceon 69L)

HFC-125/HFC-134a/HFC-143a 44/4/52 R-404a (SUVA HP62, FX70)

HFC-32/HFC-125/HFC-134a 20/40/40 R-407a (Klea 60)

HFC-32/HFC-125/HFC-134a 10/70/20 R-407b (Klea 61)

HFC-125/HFC-143a 50/50 R-507 (AZ-50)

8
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

INTRODUCTION TO EXTRACTS/SUMMARIES

This paper presents abstracts/summaries of studies concerning retrofitting of domestic refrig-


eration, mobile air conditioning (MAC), centrifugal chillers, cold storage, and commercial
refrigeration, highlighting benefits and problems. Some of the abstract summaries are extracted
directly from the source cited. Others, however, have been edited to improve clarity of the
extract, or to target the key points relevant to the subject of this paper.

The extracts are presented in the following order:

1) excerpts from UNEP Technical Options Reports

2) according to the categories of alternatives (e.g. HFC-134a retrofitted for CFC-12), and in
chronological order.

This information is provided for reference purposes only, and does not imply that UNEP
endorses, recommends, nor approves of any of the options mentioned in this paper.

9
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

DOMESTIC REFRIGERATION
Extracts from:
Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee, 1991:
Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options
Committee. Nairobi: UNEP, 1991.

Retrofit:
(i) Primary replacements: CFC-12
Most manufacturers consider that there will be an adequate supply of CFC-12 available from
production and reclaim sources to satisfy the needs until a total phaseout is accomplished. Some
manufacturers have even initiated their own reclaim efforts for capture of CFC-12 from
domestic units in the field.

(ii) Ternary blend


The ternary blend HCFC-22/HFC-152a/HCFC-124 was initially mentioned as a service
refrigerant. At present, activity in this market seems to have subsided since the ternary requires
an alkylbenzene lubricant. In some countries, such as New Zealand, this is still a possibility
since most of their units are brought back to the shop for repair, where changing the oil, if
required, is a simple process. However, it can still be done since larger amounts of mineral oil
(20-30%) can remain in the system.

(iii) HFC-134a
Field tests using HFC-134a and ester lubricants to service both automotive and larger
commercial CFC-12 open-drive and semi-hermetic systems are giving encouraging results.
However, little work is being done on servicing small hermetic compressor capillary systems.
Such systems have additional problems to be addressed, e.g., the need to ensure that no traces
of paraffinic compounds remain that might block capillaries and the desirability of lengthening
the capillary. If a method of flushing out CFC-12 systems and recharging them with HFC-134a
is developed, it is probable that a compressor change will be required. Work is progressing on
an oil for use in hermetic systems and the situation is likely to become clearer by late 1992.

An updated version of this document will be available November 1994.

HFC-134a retrofit for CFC-12


1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

HFC-134a is a leading candidate in replacing CFC-12 in refrigerators and freezers.

Problems:
Studies show from 1% less to 7% higher energy consumption than CFC-12. Problem of finding
suitable lubricants. HFC-134a has very low solubility and mineral oil does not mix well in
HFC-134a, which could contribute to the following problems:

10
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

 poor oil return back to the compressor, resulting in possible compressor failure
 fouling of expansion valves and heat exchanger surfaces, leading to reduced system
performance
Ming-Shan Zhu, Li-Zhong Han, Xiao-Yu Zhao, 1993: Dismantling inspection and retrofit
of domestic refrigerator with HFC-134a. Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC
and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., pp.
81-85

A modified SNOW FLAKE model BCD-191 refrigerator was retrofitted, adapting the
compressor, and using ester oil.

Benefits
Energy consumption of the HFC-134a refrigerator equalled that of CFC-12. Thermal perfor-
mances met national standards. Problems found when using HFC-134a in an unmodified
refrigerator were avoided. (These included the carbonization problem of the HFC-134a, the
suitable lubricant oil, accurate cleaning of the old system, redesign of the compressor and
matching of each component).

1992
Davey, J.P, et al, Rhône-Poulenc, 1992: Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L.

Benefits
Isceon 134a was identified some years ago, as ideal non-flammable, zero-ODP replacement for
CFC-12.

Problems
Immiscible with mineral oils traditionally used with CFC-12. PAGs were used, but revealed an
inherent and significant problem, namely high hygroscopicity. Improved lubrication and better
handling characteristics achieved with use of synthetic polyol ester based materials.

Ming-Shan Zhu et al., 1992: Experimental research on domestic refrigerators using HFC-
134a as refrigerant. Paper presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration Conference:
Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants, July 14-17, 1992, Purdue University, West
Lafayette, Indiana, USA. pp. 241-247

Benefits
Satisfied all national Chinese standards.

Problems
Without modification of the refrigerator, consumption of electricity was slightly higher than
CFC-12, volumetric capacity was slightly smaller, and pull down was slightly slower.

11
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Conclusion
Increasing compressor displacement by an appropriate amount can decrease energy con-
sumption. In order to lower energy consumption while using HFC-134a as a refrigerant, changes
must be made to the compressor, condenser, evaporator, capillary tube, etc. Therefore, further
study of component matching is necessary.

12
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

HFC-152a retrofit for CFC-12

1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.
Has shown the best result with regard to energy consumption.

Problems
Flammability: The safety risk is quite small in domestic refrigerators because the units have
charges of only a few hundred grams. Has approximately 5% less volumetric refrigerating
capacity than CFC-12. Typical modifications needed are:
 change of lubricant
 adjustment or change of expansion device
 change of desiccant filter

Comparison of replacement refrigerants HFC-134a and HFC-152a

1993
Vineyard, Edward; Swatkowski, Leonard. 1993: Energy efficiency of HFC-134a versus
HFC-152a. Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Con-
ference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 86-91

In an effort to evaluate the trade off between efficiency and safety of the two alternative
refrigerants HFC-152a (flammable) and HFC-134a (non flammable), energy consumption tests
were performed by 6 refrigerator/freezer manufacturers as part of a joint project.

Conclusion
Results showed no statistically significant difference between the efficiencies of HFC-134a and
HFC-152a. Thus, HFC-134a is a more acceptable substitute for CFC-12 in refrigerator-freezers
than HFC-152a assuming safety is the main difference between the two alternatives. However,
other issues, such as global warming potential and ozone depletion potential, influence the
selection of replacement refrigerants and could outweigh the effects of the reduced safety of
HFC-152a and other flammable refrigerants, such as hydrocarbons.

MP39 retrofit for CFC-12

1993
Hua Xiao-Long and Chen Wei, 1993: The comparison of the performance of MP39 DuPont
blends and CFC-12 in refrigerator/freezers. Paper presented at the International
Conference on CFC and Halon Alternatives, 20-23 April, 1993, Beijing, China, pp. 159-
164

Conclusion:

13
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

After proper modification of the refrigeration system, the energy consumption of a refrigerator
using MP39 mixture should be close to that of CFC-12. More detailed research of modifying
capillary load and refrigerant changes is being done. Input power, capacity, are higher and
energy consumption is about 5% higher. Refrigeration capacity of MP39 is larger than that of
CFC-12, and the input power of the compressor is larger too.

Case study from Lindsey Roke, Fisher and Paykel Refrigeration Division, New Zealand
in response to retrofitting query by OAIC, 1993.

100 domestic CFC-12 refrigerator cabinets serviced with MP39 (50% HCFC-22/30% HCFC-
124/ 20% HFC-152a)

Benefits
Oil not changed. Costs no more than servicing with CFC-12 except for the refrigerant price
difference (as filters should always be changed on servicing anyway).

Conclusions
Refrigerant bottle must be checked for leakage, and blends should be charged from liquid line
from cylinder, otherwise composition of refrigerant can be altered. Cabinets should be clearly
labelled to avoid future mixing of refrigerants. Filter dryer changed.

See also summary of The CFC File (New Zealand) on p. 5 for further comments on SUVA
MP39.

1992
DuPont, 1992: "DuPont SUVA MP refrigerant blends: properties, uses, storage and
handling". Delaware: DuPont, 1992

Benefits
Comparable in capacity and efficiency to CFC-12 system.

Problems
Due to fact that these blends are not true azeotropes, their compositions change at boiling point,
causing "temperature glide". The amount of glide will depend on the system design, and may
or may not affect performance. SUVA MP refrigerant blends will decompose at high
temperatures, producing toxic and irritating compounds. It is important to follow
recommendations for handling and use.

Kuijpers, L.; de Wit, J.A.; Benschop, A.A.J.; Bivens, D.B., 1991: Optimization of the
efficiency of the ternary refrigerant blend HCFC-22/124/152a in domestic freezer
equipment.

Benefits
Non flammable. Without redesign of components, the application of a certain mixture

14
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

composition was stated to yield an energy efficiency comparable to CFC-12. Could be an ideal
candidate in the domestic refrigeration sector, where reliability of compressor operation and
energy efficiency are important aspects.

15
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

MOBILE AIR CONDITIONING


Extracts from:
Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee, 1991:
Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options
Committee. Nairobi: UNEP.

Presently no chemical or blend of chemicals has been proven to be able to directly replace CFC-
12 without substantial retrofit costs.

HFC-134a retrofit for CFC-12


Retrofit costs
The upper limit of retrofit costs would result from complete system replacement with HFC-134a
compatible components at an estimated service level cost of US $ 1000-2500 per vehicle.
Estimating the average cost of retrofitting a MAC system to use HFC-134a or the blend involves
accounting for those system control devices, components and materials that are currently known
to be incompatible with the given refrigerant and hence, require replacement during retrofit.
Such items are shown in Table 10.1 for both candidate refrigerants and both types of A/C
systems. The average retrofit cost based on service level parts and labour costs is estimated to
be US $ 217. It should be noted that the components requiring replacement for retrofit are
rarely, if ever, changed during normal service. As a result, retrofit costs are in addition to any
costs needed to keep the system operating. The current average repair cost to maintain an
operating A/C system is estimated to be US $216 (MACS, 1992). Thus the overall average cost
to repair and retrofit a system to use a non-CFC is estimated to be US $ 433.

Retrofit summary
There are currently two candidate retrofit solutions that vehicle manufactures, chemical
companies, government agencies, and service groups are carefully considering. At this point in
time, however, retrofit refrigerant technology must be considered an emerging technology and
has not yet resulted in a usable retrofit refrigerant; substantial work needs to be done.

An updated version of this document will be available November 1994.

1994
Foster, K. School of Automative Engineering, Croydon Institute, South Australia: Mobile
Air Conditioning, Workshop on the Protection of the Ozone Layer. Jakarta 11 - 15 April
1994.

The general guidelines are very similar when retrofitting to HFC-134a or MP52. HFC-134a
requires mineral oil to be flushed out. Flushing agent to be used are CFC-12 or dry nitrogen.
CFC-12 must be recovered. MP52 do not require flushing. Small system modifications required.

16
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): Several documents developed on the request of


US EPA to identify alternate refrigerants and retrofit procedures for conversion of CFC-
12 mobile air conditioning systems. USA 1994.

(ISO) SAE J1657 Selection Criteria for Retrofit Refrigerants to Replace R12 in Mobile Air
Conditioning. This includes flammability, ozone depletion, toxicity and other refrigerant and
lubricant compatibility requirements to be usable in mobile A/C systems.

(ISO) SAE J1658 Alternate Refrigerants Consistency Criteria for Use in Mobile Air
Conditioning Systems. Blend refrigerants consist of more than one substance, this document
identifies the proper handling procedure, vapor or liquid phase, and identifies when the
remaining container can not be used due to improver blend consistency.

(ISO) SAE J1659 Vehicle Testing Requirements for Replacement Refrigerants for use in R12
Mobile Air Conditioning Systems. This requires certain vehicle tests which must be conducted
to establish any system performance changes due to the aøternate refrigerant.

(ISO) SAE J1660 Fittings and Labels for Retrofit or R12 Mobile Air Conditioning Systems
to R134a. This document covers modification of service fittings and labels for retrofitted
vehicles in preventing future system damage and contamination of the refrigerant supplies.

(ISO) SAE J1661 Procedure for Retrofitting R12 Mobile Air Conditioning Systems to R134a.
This covers the retrofit modification and system processing procedure to reduce the remaning
system R12 residue to less than 2%, which is required to reduce future contamination of the
R134a refrigerant supply when the vehicle is served.

(ISO) SAE J1662 Material Compatibility With Alternate Refrigerants. Seals, hoses and "O"
rings used in CFC-12 systems may not compatible with some alternate refrigerants and could
break down causing system failures. This document covers test procedures for establishing
material compatibility.

1993
Automotive Consulting Group, Michigan USA, 1993: CFC-12 Phase-Out Analysis and the
Determination of the Required Strategic Reserve. Final Report, presented to the American
Automobile Manufacturers Association and the Association of International Automobile
Manufacturers, November 3, 1993.

Cost information: ACG determined the mix of retrofit solutions from information provided
by eight different automakers. The information was weighted based upon market shares, to
determine a composite average:

17
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Mix of Vehicles at Various Retrofit Price Points

Age of Vehicle $100-250 $150-500 $400-750 Total


1 - 2 years old 29 % 22 % 49 % 100 %
3 - 4 years old 29 % 18 % 53 % 100 %
5 - 6 years old 25 % 21 % 55 % 100 %
7 - 8 years old 12 % 21 % 67 % 100 %
9 - 10 years old 7% 21 % 72 % 100 %
more than 0% 0% 100 % 100 %
10 years old

HFC-134a retrofit for CFC-12

1994
Mobile Air Conditioning Society, 1994: Guidelines for Automotive Air Conditioning
Retrofit. MACS 1994, Convention Issue, Sahara Hotel, Las Vegas.

R-12 systems were designed for R-12, and as long R-12 is available to service these systems,
this is the preferred refrigerant. The mobile A/C industry identified R-134a as the replacement
refrigerant for CFC-12 fleet after considering many things; compatibility, flammability, usable
with existing service programs, meet the costumers requirements. The paper gives guidelines
and procedures for retrofitting from CFC-12 to HFC-134a in automotive air conditioning:

1. Check system. Includes leak detection and identifying other part failures.
2. Remove R-12 from the system
3. Lubricant removal
4. Retrofit part replacement. (Seals/O-rings, hose material, compressor, desiccant, con-
denser, refrigerants controls, lubricant.)
5. Install service ports
6. System labels
7. System evacuation
8. Charge system with R-134a
9. Leak check system
10. Check system operation

1993
Abraham, Anthony W.: The availability of parts for retrofit after warranty OEM and
aftermarket perspective. Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon

18
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 312-316

Problems
There are differences between CFC-12 and HFC-134a with regard to capacity, coefficient of
performance, and compression ratio. Cleaning of the system and providing the system with
HFC-134a compatible components and lubricant. The author recommends strict adherence to
SAE 1660 and 1661 specifications that the system be cleaned properly.

Dekleva, T.W.; Colmery, S.H.; Bresnaham, John, 1993: Fleet trials with vehicles retrofitted
to Klea 134a refrigerant and Emkarate RL lubricants; a perspective after two years on the
road. Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference,
20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 294-30

Benefits
Many of the barriers to introducing mobile air conditioning retrofits are being successfully
addressed through the considerable efforts of the industry. Available data suggests that vehicles
retrofit under a range of conditions show good performance and durability. Service practices for
retrofit vehicles are considered comparable to vehicles running on CFC-12. The current status
of our fleet studies continue to show results and promise for the introduction of HFC-134a as
a retrofit refrigerant. Performance levels appear to be acceptable for the majority of owners and
conditions, and there have been no systematic performance or durability issues.

Low toxicity. Thermophysical characteristics similar to CFC-12. Residual system CFC-12


appears to be a manageable partner.

Observations
Some question still exists about the use of epichlorohydins with PAGs and certain HNBRs with
CFC-12/mineral oil, but by-in-large, it appears that most other materials existing in CFC-12
systems (with the exception of Viton) can withstand retrofitting to HFC-134a.

Rubber hoses: Available literature suggests that HFC-134a permeates through rubber hoses up
to 50% faster than does CFC-12.

Desiccants: The total available information suggests that, while replacing the desiccant with
new HFC-134a compatible material is preferred, using the XH-5 material will not lead to
catastrophic results.

Hobbs, Arthur, 1993: Supply, distribution, and availability of mobile air conditioning parts
for retrofit of CFC-12 systems to HFC-134a. Paper presented at the 1993 International
CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
pp. 304-311

In the last four years, Four Seasons has retrofitted its own vehicle fleet. Testing of this fleet is
continuous with very favorable results.

19
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Conclusions
The service technicians must be trained to understand that each vehicle will perform differently.
Refrigerant charge, condenser size, and air flow will play an important role in a successful
retrofit.

Rolotti, Gustavo; Brubaker, Michael, 1993: Experience in retrofitting CFC-12 auto air
conditioning systems with Forane HFC-134a: a system performance perspective. Paper
presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22
October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 275-284

This paper provides a case history examination of the experience of retrofitting a group of 17
factory installed vehicles from CFC-12 to Forane HFC-134a. Vehicles used in this test
represented a cross section of model years, system types, domestic and foreign makers,
compressor types etc.

Benefits
Most drivers seem to be satisfied with their system's performance after the retrofit. No short
term compressor failures were encountered. There seems to be no difference between the
performance of the systems in the flushed vs. the non-flushed groups. No Forane HFC-134a
chemical degradation has been detected during the 5 month duration of this test.

Observation
A simplified oil flushing procedure could be utilized that does not require excessive labour.

UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

Changing to HFC-134a has been mainly based on demands from the automotive engineering
sector for a substitute with pressure limits and thermodynamic properties comparable to
CFC-12.

There is no clear choice of lubricant for retrofit purposes, both PAGs and esters are being
evaluated and recommended. Both lubricant types are considerably more hygroscopic than
mineral oil, and should therefore be handled more carefully. PAG lubricants are claimed to have
better miscibility with remaining mineral oil in the system.

Problems:
A number of changes are necessary.
 Change of lubricant necessary. Two possible lubricant types have been identified, namely
POEs and PAGs.
 Change of desiccant material. This is due to the smaller size of the HFC-134a molecule
and chemical compatibility problems with conventional CFC-12 drier materials.
 Replacement of hoses. Permeation rates through conventional CFC-12 hoses (e.g. based
on nitrile rubber) are generally unacceptably high with HFC-134a. Improved hoses (e.g.

20
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

with polyamide (nylon) barrier material have been developed, which reduce permeation
considerably.
 Change to elastomer seal materials that are compatible with HFC-134a and lubricant.This
depends on recommendations of car manufacturer.
 Replacement or adjustment of high pressure cut-out switch. As high-side pressures are
generally somewhat higher with HFC-134a than with CFC-12, a higher set-point is
required.
 Replacement or adjustment of expansion valve. (optional). In systems with thermostatic
expansion valve, the static superheat setting should be increased.
Zurer, Pamela S., 1993: Looming ban on production of CFCs, halons spurs switch to
substitutes. From Chemical and Engineering News, 15 Nov 1993, pp. 12-18

About 140 million cars with CFC-12 systems are on the road in the U.S. today. In 1991, the
auto industry estimated retrofitting costs would range from $200 to $1200 per car, depending
on the make, model, and year. Besides removing the CFC-12, which is incompatible with HFC-
134a, it was thought that hoses, O-rings, the lubricant, and, in some cases, even the compressors
would have to be replaced. But after a few years of experience with retrofitted vehicles, it
appears the high end of the cost range may have been overestimated.

Costs
Volvo has already started supplying its dealers with retrofitting kits. "We are pricing the kits
low to encourage customers to take the environmentally beneficial option" of retrofitting, said
Richard Reina of Volvo Cars of North America's regulation and compliance office. Volvo set
the suggested retail price of the required parts at $45. Adding the approximately $21 charge for
2 lb of HFC-134a and another estimated $200 for labour, the total charge comes to less than
$300.

Benefits
In many cases, fewer modifications to the original air-conditioning systems will have to be made
than were originally feared. For example, it was originally thought that rubber hoses would have
to be replaced, according to Thomas W. Dekleva, ICI's North American technical service
manager, but in fact, they work very well, and in some cases, HFC-134a leaked less. The
lubricant has a big effect on reducing leakage.

Conclusion
Dekleva said that most of the air conditioners on ICI's test cars performed just about as well
with HFC-134a as with CFC-12. He found it especially telling that none of the vehicles' owners
took ICI up in its offer to convert their cars back to CFC-12 at the end of the trial.

Case study from John Bresnahan, of ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd, in response to
UNEP IE/PAC retrofitting query.
Conversion using KLEA-134a
Covers major models and makes of Australian vehicles.

21
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Conclusion
After two years, 100 vehicles show acceptable performance for the majority of owners and
conditions.

Benefits
Existing CFC-12 hoses do not need to be replaced if they are working adequately on CFC-12.
This significantly reduces conversion cost for the motorist.

22
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

1992
Bateman, D., 1992: New refrigerants for MAC. Paper presented at the Asia-Singapore
conference on the phasing out of ozone depleting substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore.

For comparison with MP52, see summary under Bateman, D.: 1992, under the heading of
"SUVA MP52" below.

Benefits
Provides cooling properties similar to CFC-12. To optimism the performance of HFC-134a in
new a/c systems, many components need to be redesigned: lubricants, compressor, desiccant,
hoses, evaporator, and condenser. These hurdles have been overcome due to significant
development effort by the vehicle, component and chemical manufacturers, and a worldwide
transition to HFC-134a systems in new vehicles has begun.

Problems
HFC-134a is not compatible with mineral oil, and there is debate as to the necessity of flushing
of old system to remove the mineral oil. PAG lubricants have been chosen for the first
commercial vehicles using HFC-134a. Lubricant development will continue and there is likely
to be an evolution to second generation lubricants in the mid to late 1990s.

Conclusion:
DuPont believes there are two viable options: HFC-134a and SUVA MP52. Neither is a drop-in
replacement and both will require some retrofit. ... We believe in many situations that MP52
will be the lower cost option while providing customer satisfaction. In many other cases, retrofit
cost of MP52 will be similar to HFC-134a.

Dekleva, T.W., et. al., 1992: Retrofitting MAC systems with HFC-134a - an update. Paper
presented at the 1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, Sept 29 -Oct
1, 1992, Washington, USA. pp. 697-705

In continuing fleet trials and laboratory testing, HFC-134a combined with ester lubricants
appear to offer acceptable levels of performance and systems compatibility.

Problem
Previous work has shown what HFC-134a may be expected to permeate more from both rubber
and nylon lined hoses than does CFC-12, at similar temperatures. This permeation can be
reduced by the presence of synthetic lubricants

McNeal Morris, James: 1992: Ozone depletion and the automobile aircon industry. Paper
presented at the Asia-Singapore Conference on the Phasing Out of Ozone Depleting
Substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore.

Conclusions

23
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

No problem has been experienced with the use of HFC-134a in our compressors as a retrofit
refrigerant for CFC-12 ( with a limited amount of vehicle testing complete).

Mineral oils need to be changed to a lubricant compatible with HFC-134a. Work being done
by ICI and Sanden in using an ICI ester oil as a drop-in lubricant with HFC-134a, offers
significant advantages to the service industry. At present, ester oil seem to be a better lubricant
than PAG oil, because they mix well with HFC-134a, and appear to be miscible with existing
mineral oils. Japanese manufacturers do not advise using blends so we will go direct to HFC-
134a for retrofitting.

Roke, Lindsey, 1992: Report from the Technical Options Committee on Refrigeration.
Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific conference on the phasing out of ozone depleting
substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore

Australia is notable for automotive air conditioning conversions where they are finding that it
is generally proving little more difficult to apply HFC-134a than to apply ternary blends. In both
cases barrier hoses are highly desirable if not essential to cut emission losses. Note though, that
many cars being built today are already fitted with such barrier hoses even though they are still
using CFC-12. This certainly appears to be a good move by the automobile manufacturers.
HFC-134a has a slightly lower critical temperature than CFC-12, and each conversion has to
be evaluated on its own merit. In other words it is a system-specific conversion.

Problems
Capillary blocking: It is necessary to make sure that contaminants are not on the system, as they
are liable to deposit towards the end of the capillary and reduce flow by some 15-20%. The
technique for handling this problem is to make sure that there is no contamination in the
system.It is essential to keep moisture levels to the minimum.

SUVA MP52 retrofit for CFC-12

Bateman, D., 1992: New refrigerants for MAC. Paper presented at the Asia-Singapore
conference on the phasing out of ozone depleting substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore.

This is a 3 component blend, containing HCFC-22, HFC-152a, HCFC-124.

Benefits
Good environmental properties. DuPont has selected a mixture of mineral oil with alkylbenzene
lubricant, eliminating the need to flush the system, as laboratory tests have confirmed that
alkylbenzene and the MP52 are compatible with residual CFC-12 and mineral oil. MP52 is not
flammable. Provides cooling properties similar to CFC-12.

Conclusion:
DuPont believes there are two viable options: HFC-134a and SUVA MP52. Neither is a drop-in

24
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

replacement and both will require some retrofit. ... We believe in many situations that MP52
will be the lower cost option while providing customer satisfaction. In many other cases, retrofit
cost of MP52 will be similar to HFC-134a.

25
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Blends retrofit for CFC-12

1994
George H. Goble: Some Safety Studies of a Ternary Refrigerant. Paper presented at the
1994 International Refrigeration Conference at the Purdue University, USA in July 1994.

The paper presents the blend HCFC-22/600a/HCFC-142b as a drop-in replacement refrigerant


both for CFC-12 and for R-500. The paper covers safety related issues, testing performed to
date, and results of fractionation and flammability testing. The blend is recommended by
ASHRAE SPC-34 to be classified in the lowest toxicity group and as a non-flammable
refrigerant (A1/A2). If the blend is fractionated and leaks, some compositions may be "weakly"
flammable. The flammability is still less, the lower and upper ingnition limits is higher and the
heat of combustion is lower than for the highly flammable and explosive refrigerants (e.g.
propane/butane). R-406a has been used in automobiles, semi trucks, vending machines, ice
machines etc. There have been several cases of hoses burning in mobile A/C, due to mechanical
defects or related problems, but no reports of problems related to flammability.

1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

There is considerable reluctancy in the industry to move toward retrofit solutions based on
refrigerants other than HFC-134a. Mixtures based on HCFC-22/HFC-152a/HFC-124 have been
proposed as retrofit blends although:

Problems
Differences in hose permeation rates probably will lead to loss of the HCFC component over
some time (preferential leak). Retrofit will require change of desiccant, and maybe also of
lubricant to alkylbenzene.

Experience
1. In the US, a number of blends or chemicals claimed to replace CFC-12 have been produced.
Behind such names as "GHG", "Alaska Cool" and "Arctic Chill" , which are claimed to be safe
CFC-12 substitutes, one may find combinations of HCFC-22, HCFC-142b, HFC-152a, R-176,
isobutane and even CFC-12. Some of these compounds will destroy the existing CFC-12
desiccant which may lead to clogging of the expansion device, and some are flammable or
explosive. If systems containing such blends are brought to a workshop for service or repair,
there is considerable risk of contaminating recycling equipment and of spreading these
compounds to other vehicles through containers, etc.

2. Results from a fleet retrofit study by ICI in Australia and the USA are reported. Vehicles
range in age from 1985-models to 1992-models, and ten different types of compressors and
varying expansion valves/orifice tubes are included. All systems are based on ester lubricant
after retrofit. Preliminary results are good, indicating essentially equivalent capacity and no

26
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

particular problems of operation. Long term effects remain to be investigated.

1992
George H. Goble: A Drop-in CFC-12 Replacement for Automotive Airconditioning. Paper
presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration Conference on Energy Efficiency and
New Refrigerants at the Purdue University, USA in July 1992.

The paper presents the blend HCFC-22/600a/HCFC-142b as a transition fluid, to replace CFC-
12 in automotive air conditioners. The blend has the composition 55/8/37 (later developed into
R-406, with the composition 55/4/41), and ODP = 0.057. It is compatible with mineral oil. The
blend is tested in 150 vehicles with only one failure, and the failure was not due to refrigerant
change. Due to the content of isobutane, the blend is miscible with mineral oil. The air delivery
is colder than for CFC-12. The condensing temperature is higher than with CFC-12, but not
high enough for refrigerant-oil breakdown. The paper discusses testing of silane-based dessicant
and sealant additives to reduce leakages, and reviews flammability for the blend and for the
compound of the blend after leakage. The paper suggest that the blend can customized for hot
climates.

Personal communication

1994
Personal communication from REFAC Consultants (February 1994)
Recent trials have demonstrated that successful retrofits can be achieved with a minimum of
component changes and little system cleaning. I understand that the original view that retrofit
required almost complete removal of the existing mineral oil has now been shown to be an
unnecessarily conservative one. This is important in reducing the time, and hence cost of
retrofit. ICI has conducted extensive vehicle fleet trials which support the above conclusions.

Personal communication from DuPont (January 1994)


The Australian government has undertaken a significant automotive air conditioning retrofit
effort using DuPont's MP 52 blend and are very satisfied with the results. Singapore has
undertaken the task of retrofitting all of their taxi air conditioning units with the MP 52 blend;
again with excellent results. These retrofits, using blends, have cost about $200 U.S./vehicle
and performance problems or equipment failures have not been detected. While UNEP and
member companies are trying to insure that there will not be shortages of CFC-12 in developing
countries, it should be recognized that logistics of supply and specific volumes have not been
worked out and some supply disruption should be expected.

27
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

CENTRIFUGAL CHILLERS
Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee, 1991:
Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options
Committee. Nairobi: UNEP.

Centrifugal chillers are designed for specific refrigerants. Direct refrigerant substitutes can only
be made in cases where the properties of the substitute refrigerant are nearly the same as those
of the refrigerant for which the equipment was designed.

HCFC-123 retrofit for CFC-11


Benefits
HCFC-123 became available in 1989 for retrofit into existing CFC-11 chillers.

Problems
It is a more aggressive solvent than CFC-11. Non-metallic materials may have to be replaced
with materials which are more compatible with HCFC-123. Materials used in the motors of
older hermetic chillers may not be compatible with HCFC-123, putting motor reliability at risk
or requiring motor replacement. The dielectric strength of HCFC-123 is much lower than that
of CFC-11 raising questions about viability with some high voltage motors. System capacity
may be reduced by between 0 and 20% depending on the matching of the compressor to the load
and heat exchanger effectiveness.

Preliminary results from toxicology tests for HCFC-123 obtained in mid-1991, led to
recommendations that exposure of personnel to HCFC-124 in an 8 or 12 hour workday be
limited to a 10ppm (or lower) time weighed average concentration. This means that machinery
rooms for HFC-123 chillers must be equipped with sensitive detectors, adequate ventilation
systems, and means to alert operators in the event of a significant leak or spill. These
precautions have not been taken in the past for CFC chiller. ASHRAE Standard 15R now
requires similar precautions for CFCs and HCFCs as well. Changeout of the compressor to a
higher-capacity model or purchase of additional chillers may be necessary. Cycle efficiency will
be reduced by at least 1-2%

HCFC-141b retrofit for CFC-11


HCFC-141b has more or less the same properties as HCFC-123 and could be used as a
replacement candidate for CFC-11 as well.

HCFC-134a retrofit for CFC-12


Benefits
Available since 1991 for retrofit in centrifugal chillers.

Problems

28
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Its use requires higher tip speeds than CFC-12, so impeller and/or gearbox replacementä is
necessary. Typically, oils used for CFC-12 are not miscible with HFC-134a. PAG oils
developed for HFC-134a are not compatible with CFC-12 residues, thus requiring thorough
flushing of the systems before replacement. Ester oils seem to have overcome this problem.
Some desiccants (e.g. activated alumina) commonly used in CFC-12 systems are not compatible
with HFC-134a.

HCFC-124 retrofit for CFC-114


This has been suggested as an alternative to CFC-114 in centrifugal chillers such as those used
in naval applications. It is not readily available for use in either new or retrofit chillers. (1991)

Problems
HCFC-124 requires operation at higher pressure levels, higher compressor speeds, and smaller
impeller diameters than CFC-114. HCFC-124 is not suitable for use in existing systems in most
cases because the pressure levels will exceed design ratings and complete compressors
replacement is necessary.

HFC-152a/HCFC-124/HCFC-22 mixture for CFC-12


Benefits
It is compatible with conventional refrigeration oils.

Problems
It is not readily available because HCFC-124 is not in large production. The mixture is likely
to have degraded heat transfer performance in the flooded evaporators and shell side
condensation normally used in centrifugal chillers. Thus there is likely to be a significant
performance penalty when substituted in existing chillers. Servicing such a system brings on
new difficulties because any vapour losses will change composition and performance.
Measuring and changing equipment are not available to mitigate this problem.

HCFC-22/HCFC-142b mixture retrofit for CFC-12


This azeotropic mixture is being used in France to retrofit systems using CFC-12.

Benefits
Both components of the mixture are available commercially. The mixture is not flammable to
the proportions used to emulate CFC-12 (but flammable proportions can be encountered as a
result of spills or losses).

An updated version of this document will be available November 1994.

HCFC-123 retrofit for CFC-11

29
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

The compatibility of HCFC-123 with construction materials must be considered. For large
centrifugal chillers, it may be necessary to replace compressor impellers/gears to ensure the
required performance is maintained.

Benefits
It is currently the only available candidate to replace CFC-11 in existing centrifugal chillers.
Current lubricants used with CFC-11 are fully miscible at all operating conditions, and it is not
necessary to switch to another lubricant.

Problem
HCFC-123 is a strong solvent toward plastics and elastomers and selling and weight change
may occur. Thus it is necessary to change O-rings, and other parts made of plastics or
elastomers, with parts qualified by manufacturers for use with HCFC-124.

Yan Zu Qing, 1993: Research on the application of HCFC-123 as an alternative of CFC-11


in centrifugal chillers. Paper presented at the International Conference on CFC and
Halon Alternatives, 20-23 April, 1993, Beijing, China. pp. 382-387

Benefits
Most of the constructive materials in the chiller are compatible with both CFC-11 and HCFC-
123, although neoprene O-rings, rubber gaskets and certain insulating materials of motor will
be deteriorated by HCFC-123 due to its strong solvent nature. Non-combustible.

Problems
Refrigerating cycle efficiency is lowered 2-5%. Capacity decreased by 10-15% on average.
Performance curve of the compressor becomes steeper and surging more often with HCFC-123
if used directly as an alternative. Additional requirements necessary for the machine room.

1992
March Consulting Group, 1992: CFCs in the UK refrigeration and air conditioning
industries: usage and the scope for substitution: a study for the Department of the Envi-
ronment carried out by March Consulting Group. United Kingdom.

HCFC-123 can be considered a retrofit fluid.

Problems
There may be a need to change the impeller of the compressor, its speed of rotation and in some
cases the electric motor. Indications from the PAFT toxicity testing programme gives some
doubt about R-123 as benign tumours have been identified in rats subject to high doses. Some

30
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

manufacturers are worried about using R-123.

Siebert, Bruce, 1992: Factors in converting centrifugal chillers to HCFC-123. Paper


presented at the 1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, Sept 29-Oct
1, 1992, Washington, USA. pp. 271-275

Benefits
Only 2% the ODP of CFC-11

Problems
2-5% less efficient than CFC-11. Because of greater mass of HCFC-123, there isä a reduction
in the capacity of chillers designed for CFC-11 of 5-20%. Entire system mustä be reviewed
before conversion. including such factors as age of equipment, maintenance history, con-
sideration of replacing components.

HFC-134a retrofit for CFC-12

1993
Arnaud, D., 1993: An example of successful retrofit with HFC-134a in the industrial field.
Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22
October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 193-202

This paper discusses a successful retrofit of a CFC-12 centrifugal compressor system to HFC-
134a. The project was a cooperative operation involving cooperation among Elf Atochem, York
France, and Elf Lubricants. The experiment was done on one of the three centrifugal
compressors used in the chlorine liquefaction process stream at Jarrie (France) and one from
Elf Atochem's biggest electrolysis reactor. The retrofit was done in 6 main steps:

1. Installation evaluation and achievement of baseline determination with CFC-12 (4 days)


2. Purging and flushing of original mineral oil (1 week)
3. Replacement of the compressor shaft seal (1 day)
4. Recovery of CFC-12 charge.
5. Charging with HFC-134a (2 days)
6. Validation with HFC-134a (5 days)

Benefits
More economical than buying a new HFC-134a centrifugal machine.

Conclusion:
A viable a low cost HFC-134a retrofitting technology has been developed and tested with
success on an industrial CFC-12 centrifugal compressor.

31
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

The retrofitting was made almost one year ago and has demonstrated the durability of existing
CFC-12 equipment at a very low acceptable cost.

Personal communication

Personal Communication from DuPont (January 1994)


DuPont has worked with all of the major chiller manufacturers and developed a plan to totally
displace CFCs from its 560 industrial and process chillers. This family of chillers represents
a wide range of sizes and includes CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114, and R-500 (CFC-
12/HFC-152a) units. While some old or obsolete have had to be replaced, most have been
retrofitted. The entire programme will cost about 90 million US dollars vs. an estimated
replacement cost of 1-2 billion US dollars if all units had been replaced. Therefore, the retrofit
is running below 10% of the installed cost of new units. Efficiency and capacity changes have
been seen in both direction; some positive and some negative. Chiller retrofits must be looked
at on an individual basis but the industry is becoming very proficient at the retrofit technique
for all of the units made by international equipment producers.

Personal communication from REFAC Consultants (February 1994)


The vast majority of CFC-12 centrifugal chillers can be retrofitted to HFC-134a, irrespective
of age. Post 1989 CFC-11 chillers from the manufacturers in the developed countries are
"HCFC-123 retrofit ready". For pre-1989 chillers, open drive machines can be fairly easily
retrofitted, hermetic systems generally require conversion to open drive which is a major
modification rather than a "retrofit" and will not be economic for older machines. If thereä is
spare capacity the retrofit of a CFC-12 chiller can be relatively simple with only minor
engineering changes. To achieve a similar capacity to the existing CFC-12 duty more expensive
gearbox changes are involved. It is then very difficult to give any general figure for retrofit costs
and any attempt to provide one by reference to an individual project is likely to be misleading.

32
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

COLD STORAGE AND FOOD PROCESSING


1994
Malek, A., CETIM, 1994: Preliminary considerations on retrofitting a cold storage to non-
CFC fluids. Paper presented at the 1994 IIR International Conference for New
Applications of Natural Working Fluids in Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, May 10-
13, 1994, Hannover, Germany. The study has been prepared on consultation with UNEP
IE/PAC OzonAction Programme.

HCFC-22, HFC-134a, and ammonia are compared as alternative refrigerants to CFC-12 in cold
storage. The refrigerants are compared with regard to thermodynamic and physical properties,
coefficients of performance, components (modifications necessary), material compatibility,
toxicity and safety considerations.

Ammonia has a great advantage of high thermal and thermodynamic performances, in addition
to being a natural fluid. Specific analysis of each particular case must be performed before a
retrofitting fluid is definitely selected.

1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

HFC-134a is an alternative refrigerant to CFC-12 in cold storage. Studies show from 1% less
to 7% higher energy consumption than CFC-12. Problem of finding suitable lubricants. HFC-
134a has very low solubility and mineral oil does not mix well in HFC-134a, which could
contribute to the following problems:

 poor oil return back to the compressor, resulting in possible compressor failure
 fouling of expansion valves and heat exchanger surfaces, leading to reduced system
performance

Shaw, D.A, T. Chadderton, R.M.Kemp, Meat Industry Research Institute of New


Zealand: Retrofitting R12 and R502 Refrigeration Systems with Non-CFC Refrigerants.
Paper presented in proceedings from commissions B1, B2, D1, D2/3, Cold Chain
Refrigeration Equipment by design, 15 - 18 November 1993.

The paper presents a case study of retrofitting of a small walk-in meat chiller which has been
converted from CFC-12/mineral oil to HFC-134a/syntetic ester lubricant. It also describes how
a retrofit from R-502 to HFC azeotrope blend (AZ50) is going to take place. Eight months after
the HFC-134a retrofit, almost half of the refrigerant had leaked fromä the system, but no major
leaks could be found. The lost charge was replaced and the servicing procedure upgraded.
Otherwise, no major component failures have occured and the equipment has been operating
satisfactory for 10 months. The CFC-12 to HFC-134a retrofit gave the following results:

33
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

 It may be possible to reduce the mineral oil content to 1% in only two flushes for a wide
variety of systems.
 The time between oil changes may be spread out over a prolonged period if necessary, so
that hte retrofit can work in around existing production schedules.
 Filter-dryers may need to be replaced at more regular intervals than for CFC-12, to prevent
the build-up of moisture in the system.
 Refrigerant leakage should be reduced by improving the integrity of the refrigeration
system.

Chadderton, T. & Kemp, R.: Drop-In Alternatives for CFC Refrigeration Systems. Meat
Industry Research Institute of New Zealand. 1993.

CFC usage in the food industry has been investigated, and an international database of literature
on CFC alternatives has been set up. Drop-in alternatives for CFC-12 and R-502 have been
investigated. Ternary blends are investigated. The blends are zeotropic, and with leaks the
composition may change. It is therefore essential with a good maintenance practise to minimize
the problem.

CFC-12 alternatives:
 HCFC-22. Are prefered for "familiar" reasons. Results in high discharge pressure and
temperature. Considerable expenses.
 HFC-134a. New lubricant has been developed. Special retrofit procedures has to be
followed, including flushing of the system to get the mineral oil content down to less than
1 %. Capacity loss of appr. 10 % compared to original CFC-12 system. HFC-134a involves
significant time an cost, and should only be considered for systems in good condition.
 MP39, a ternary blend. "Virtual" drop-in refrigerant.

R-502 alternatives:
 69L, a ternary blend. Claimed to be a "straight" drop-in, only minor changes are necessary.
Oil change is not required. Capacity increase of 2 - 7 %, and also increase in COP
compared to R-502.
 HP80, a low-temperature ternary blend. Similar performance properties as R-502. Special
retrofit procedures has to be followed, including flushing of the system.

1992
Corr, S., Gregson, R. D., Tompsett, G., ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd.: Retrofitting
large refrigeration systems with R-134a. Paper presented at the 1992 International
Refrigeration Conference - Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants. 14 - 17 July 1992,
Purdue University, USA.

Case Story: Retrofit of a food processing refrigeration system with R-134a. One of two identical
machines with separate primary refrigerant circuits and a common second refrigerant circuit,
located in a refrigerated chocolate storage area, was retrofitted. The system was retrofitted

34
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

according to ICI's retrofit procedures. The lubricant was changedä to ester oil with a viscosity
to match ISO VG68 mineral oil saturated with CFC-12. To ensure that all traces of CFC-12 and
other contaminants was removed, the system was evacuated with the triple evacuation method:
system was repeatedly evacuated to a pressure of 1 mm Hg absolute or lower. COP-
measurements showed a slight increase.

Davey, J.P, et al, Rhône-Poulenc, 1992: Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L.

Isceon HFC-134a was identified some years ago, as ideal non-flammable, zero-ODP
replacement for CFC-12. Immiscible with mineral oils traditionally used with CFC-12. PAGs
were used, but revealed an inherent and significant problem, namely high hygroscopicity.
Improved lubrication and better handling characteristics achieved with use of synthetic polyol
ester based materials.

Isceon 69-S and 69-L was jointly developed as CFC-free drop-in alternatives to R-502. They
are non-flammable, although containing a flammable, and near-azeotropic. No hardware
changes of any description are required in a retrofit employing ISCEON 69-S an 69-L.
Refrigeration capacity and energy efficiency increases slightly (COP increases appr. 6-8 %),
discharge temperature slightly decreasing.

Rhône-Poulenc chemicals, March 1992: Isceons 69-S and Isceons 69-L - Case Studies.
The paper presents successful case studies of retrofitting from R-502 in cold storage and
commercial with Isceon 69-S and 69-L.

Isceon 69-S in cold stores, eg. with the patented Star Refrigeration low pressure receiver
system. Same (or slightly better) capacity and efficiency as a identical unit with R-502, no
problems with lubrication or oil return. Low temperature cold storage,

Isceon 69-L is used as retrofit refrigerant in a number of supermarkets, eg. using 4 x 20 HP four
cylinder Bitzer compressors. No hardware changes necessary. Isceon 69-L was chosen because
of high discharge temperature in the unit. Isceon 69-L is also used in a Maneurop GLT 28
compressor at frozen food display cases at fish market, low temperature air cooled system.
Isceon 69-L offers up to 6-7% improved energy efficiency and refrigeration capacity.

35
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION
1994
Allied Signals Chemicals. Refrigeration Report, An Update from Allied Signal on the
Progress of Environmentally Acceptable Fluorocarbon Alternatives, page 2 & 3: Texas
Supermarket Preparing for Future with Allied Signal's Genetron AZ-50. January 1994.

Allied Signal and Copeland are working together, to ensure optimum system performance when
retrofitting from R-502 to AZ-50, an azeotropic mixture of HFC-125/HFC-143a. The article
describes a conversion of a supermarket from R-502 to AZ-50. The existing equipment, a
®
Copeland 15 hp Discus 4D compressor, was cooling 32 feet of low-temperature, frozen-food
display case. The equipment was checked for proper operation before the conversion;
expansion-valve superheat, head pressure and oil pressure, suction pressure and temperature,
discharge pressure, compressor amperage, voltage, and ambient temperature.

No major modification was done with the equipment. The mineral oil was replaced with polyol
ester-based lubricant. To reach the maximum remaining mineral oil content, five percent, the
lubricant was changed three times, with 72 hours operation time between each change.
Discharge pressure is about 20 psi higher with AZ-50 than with R-502, no other significant
changes occurs. Future retrofits of similar systems are estimated to cost approximately US $
1,500.

1993
UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

HFC-134a is an alternative refrigerant to CFC-12 in cold storage. Studies show from 1% less
to 7% higher energy consumption than CFC-12. Problem of finding suitable lubricants. HFC-
134a has very low solubility and mineral oil does not mix well in HFC-134a, which could
contribute to the following problems:

 poor oil return back to the compressor, resulting in possible compressor failure
 fouling of expansion valves and heat exchanger surfaces, leading to reduced system
performance

Lawson, C. Curtis, DuPont Fluorochemicals: Alternative Refrigerants for Retrofit of


Existing CFC-12 and R-502 Commercial Refrigeration Systems. Presented at the Inter-
national Conference on CFC and Halon Alternatives, Beijing, P.R.C, April 20-23, 1993.

The paper provides an overview of the alternative refrigerant candidate from DuPont, and
discuss retrofit procedures and equipment retrofit experiences with alternatives for servicing
existing CFC-12 and R-502 refrigeration equipment. Over 5000 super markets and restaurants
has been converted successfully into DuPont's alternative refrigerants.

36
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

CFC-12:
 MP39 for medium temperature stationary equipment, down to -23°C. Comparable capacity.
Alkylbenzene lubricant.
 MP66 for low temperature, below -23°C (and as replacement for R-500 in medium
temperature applications). Comparable capacity. Alkylbenzene lubricant.
 MP52 for automotive air conditioning systems.
 HFC-134a. Requires more extensive system preparation and equipment modifications than
the blends. Lower capacity, might require a bigger compressor for low temperature systems.
Polyol ester lubricant required, two-three oil flushes.

R-502
 HP80 Comparable capacity and discharge temperature, preferable when high discharge
temperature might be a problem. Alkylbenzene lubricant. Polyol ester can also be used, but
require two-three oil flushes.
 HP81 Slightly higher efficiency. Alkylbenzene lubricant. Polyol ester can also be used, but
require two-three oil flushes.
 HP62, longterm alternative (does not contain HCFC). Requires more extensive system
preparation. Slightly lower capacity and slightly higher compressor ratio at low tem-
perature, may require a bigger compressor. Polyol ester lubricant required, two-three oil
flushes.

Conversion Retrofit Step


1. Establish base line data with CFC-12 or R-502
2. Remove CFC-12 or R-502 from system into recovery cylinder
3. Drain mineral oil
4. Charge system with approved lubricant
5. Replace filter drier
6. Evacuate the system
7. Charge with alternative refrigerant
8. Start up system and optimize charge

The CFC File, (New Zealand) Issue 1, July 1993

Benefits
R-134a is the best option for CFC-12 systems. DuPont's SUVA MP39 is another alternative,
albeit interim because it contains HCFC-22. The price of HFC-134a has fallen by around 50%
since the beginning of 1992, and should continue to fall as world-wide production increases.
The price of CFCs is increasing world-wide, with CFC-12 doubling in price since January 1992.

1992
Davey, J.P, et al, Rhône-Poulenc, 1992: Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L.

37
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Isceon HFC-134a was identified some years ago, as ideal non-flammable, zero-ODP
replacement for CFC-12. Immiscible with mineral oils traditionally used with CFC-12. PAGs
were used, but revealed an inherent and significant problem, namely high hygroscopicity.
Improved lubrication and better handling characteristics achieved with use of synthetic polyol
ester based materials.

Isceon 69-S and 69-L was jointly developed as CFC-free drop-in alternatives to R-502. They
are non-flammable, although containing a flammable, and near-azeotropic. no hardware
changes of any description are required in a retrofit employing ISCEON 69-S an 69-L.
Refrigeration capacity and energy efficiency increases slightly (COP increases appr. 6-8 %),
discharge temperature slightly decreasing.

Rhône-Poulenc chemicals, March 1992: Isceon 69-S and Isceon 69-L - Case Studies.

The paper presents successful case studies of retrofitting from R-502 in cold storage and
commercial with Isceon 69-S and 69-L.

Isceon 69-S in cold stores, eg. with the patented Star Refrigeration low pressure receiver
system. Same (or slightly better) capacity and efficiency as a identical unit with R-502, no
problems with lubrication or oil return. Low temperature cold storage,

Isceon 69-L is used as retrofit refrigerant in a number of supermarkets, eg. using 4 x 20 HP four
cylinder Bitzer compressors. No hardware changes necessary. Isceon 69-L was chosen because
of high discharge temperature in the unit. Isceon 69-L is also used in a Maneurop GLT 28
compressor at frozen food display cases at fish market, low temperature air cooled system.
Isceon 69-L offers up to 6-7% improved energy efficiency and refrigeration capacity.

38
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

RETROFIT IN GENERAL
1993
Heap, R.D., A.R. Lawton, Cambridge Refrigeration Technology, United Kingdom:
Retrofitting to Alternative Refrigerant - How Effective is it? Paper presented in pro-
ceedings from commissions B1, B2, D1, D2/3, Cold Chain Refrigeration Equipment by
design, 15 - 18 November 1993.

The paper discussed retrofits of CFC-12 and R-502 systems with HFC-134a and blends. Several
clip-on container refrigeration units has been retrofitted from CFC-12 to HFC-134a, and the
lubricant used is polyolester-based. R-502 refrigeration tower units are retrofitted to HCFC-69S.
The paper concludes that retrofitting to alternative refrigerants is effective and worth while, but
for some equipment there can be refrigeration capacity losses at ISO rating conditions which
are unacceptable in some applications. For such equipment, machinery modifications may be
necessary. In retrofitted containers, the advantages of a single refrigerant, HFC-134a for both
new and retrofitted equipment will outweigh the benefits of tailored blends for particular
applications in most cases. For other transport-related systems using CFC-502, blends provide
a good solution. In this application, the global warming effects of likely refrigerant loss are
negligible compared with the effects due to the associated power generation.

Transport Refrigeration
Fleck, J. G., Blue Star Line (NZ) Ltd: Field Experience with Container Refrigeration Units
Retrofitted with Alternative Refrigerant and Synthetic Oil. Paper presented in proceedings
from commissions B1, B2, D1, D2/3, Cold Chain Refrigeration Equipment by design, 15 -
18 November 1993.

20 marine clip on units designed for refrigeration Port Hole Containers has been observed in
a research program on retrofitting to HFC-134a and polyol ester lubricant. The units had
identical design, 10 were 5 years old and 10 were 3 years old. Half of the units were then
retrofitted, and the rest were serviced and had an oil and dryer change. The units were observed
for 12 months, to detect differences in operation, air delivery temperature, failures etc. The
results showed that good, well designed, generously proportioned systems, having compressors
with good volumetric efficiency and positive displacement lub oil systems can be retrofilled
with some confidence. Losses in refrigeration capacity can be expected in existing plants, but
these can be minimized by carefull consideration and tesing prior to the conversion and
checking of the performance of the system components. The evaporator and
compressorcapacities appear to restict HFC-134a at low evaporating temperatures, and it is also
advisable to check the gas velocities in the piping system.

UNEP IE: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

Personal Communication from Morten Skjennem, Thermo King, Norway.


Thermo King, Norway has converted several units for road transport to ODS-free refrigerants.
All Thermo Kings refrigeration units was previously using alkylbenzene lubricants. It is

39
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

important to follow the retrofit procedures.


 247 low temperature units retrofitted from R-502 to 69L.
Evaporation temperature down to appr. -29°C. No lubrication change was necessary.
Customers claim that energy requirement has decreased. There seems to be less compressor
failures with retrofitted units than with R-502-units.
 7 medium temperature units retrofitted from CFC-12 to HFC-134a.
Evaporation temperature down to appr. -0°C. Lubricant changed to polyol esteroil.
 2 units retrofitted from HFC-134a to 69 L.
The retrofitting was done in order to increase the refrigeration capacity in the low tem-
perature range. Lubricant changed to alcylbenzen lubricant.

Due to less expensive retrofitting, Thermo King is also preparing for retrofitting from CFC-12
to MP66 for old equipment.

40
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

APPENDIX A
BIBLIOGRAPHY
These are only a selection of documents. OAIC also has access to document abstracts of
FRIDOC of the International Institute of Refrigeration (nearly 4000 in 1993). Where an author
has indicated his organization, this is identified in the bibliography.

Arnaud, D., Macaudiere, S., Tanguy, J.C., Radice, P.F., Elf Atochem S.A.: Properties of
blends which can be used as CFC-502 substitutes in refrigeration. Paper presented at the
1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, September 29 - October 1
1992, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 105 - 114

Bitzer, 1993: Refrigerant Report 2, The future has already begun. Perspectives in
refrigerant development. No. 9306 E, 12/93.

Elf Atochem: Principaux Substituts du R-502. Received from M. Verhille, Elf Atochem
May 6, 1994.

Elf Atochem: Tech Digest, Forane 404a. Elf Atochem North America.

Fleck, J. G., Blue Star Line (NZ) Ltd: Field Experience with Container Refrigeration Units
Retrofitted with Alternative Refrigerant and Synthetic Oil. Paper presented in proceedings
from commissions B1, B2, D1, D2/3, Cold Chain Refrigeration Equipment by design, 15 -
18 November 1993.

Gerdsmeyer, K.D, 1992. HFC-134a (R-134a) in small commercial refrigeration systems:


some practical aspects. Paper presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration Conference -
Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants. 14 - 17 July 1992, Purdue University, USA.

Hans T. Haukås, 1994: Konvertering av kuldeanlegg med KFK. (Retrofit of refrigeration


units with CFC.) Paper presented at Norsk Kjøleteknisk Årsmøte 28 - 30 January 1994.

Komatsuzaki, S.; Iizuka, T., 1993. Miscibility and lubricity of polyol ester-based
refrigerator lubricants. Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon
Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 92-100.

SINTEF Refrigeration, 1994: Internal paper; Konvertering fra CFC-12 til HFC-134a.
(Retrofit from CFC-12 to HFC-134a). Summary from workshops on retrofitting, september
1993 and january 1994.

SINTEF Refrigeration, 1993: Brochure: Avvikling av KFK i kuldeanlegg. (Phase-out of


CFCs in Refrigeration Plants.)

SINTEF Refrigeration, 1992: Blandinger for varmepumper (blend for heat pumps). SFT11
A92069, 1992.

41
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

UNEP IE, 1991: Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical
Options Committee.

UNEP IE, 1993: Catalogue of Technologies for Protecting the Ozone Layer, Refrigeration,
Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps. Norway, 1993.

Domestic Refrigeration
Anon, 1993: Alternatives for CFC refrigeration equipment. The CFC File (New Zealand),
Issue 1, July 1993

Boot, J.L., 1990: "An overview of the CFC alternatives for domestic refrigerators and
freezers. Whirlpool Corporation, USA

Case study from Lindsey Roke, Fisher and Paykel Refrigeration Division, New Zealand in
response to UNEP IE/PAC retrofitting query.
Affiliation: Fisher and Paykel Refrigeration Division (New Zealand)

Chadderton, T., Kemp, R., 1993: "Drop-in alternatives for CFC refrigeration systems",
MIRINZ (Meat Industry Research of New Zealand).

Davey, J.P.; Mulliss, C.C., undated: "Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L". Rhône-Poulenc, UK

DuPont, 1992: "DuPont SUVA MP refrigerant blends: properties, uses, storage and
handling". Delaware: DuPont, USA

Greenpeace, 1993: "Some remarks regarding the use of natural hydrocarbons to substitute
ozone depleting substances in refrigeration". Germany.

Hua Xiao-Long; Chen Wei, 1993: "The comparison of the performance of MP39 DuPont
blends and CFC-12 in refrigerator/freezers". Paper presented at the International
Conference on CFC and Halon Alternatives, 20-23 April, 1993, Beijing, China, pp. 159-164
Affiliation: Shanghai Research Institute of General Machinery, China
Shanghai Refrigerator Factory, China
Shanghai Institute of Organo-Fluorine Materials, China

Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay/Indian Ministry, 1993: "Project to develop retrofits


of CFC operated household refrigerators with CFC free refrigerants"*, April 1993. Extracts
from remarks of Dr Lambert Kuijpers
* This developmental project was submitted to the Executive Committee (10th meeting) for
its consideration.

Komatsuzaki, S.; Iizuka, T., 1993."Miscibility and lubricity of polyol ester-based


refrigerator lubricants". Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon

42
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 92-100
Affiliation: Hitachi Ltd, Japan

Kuijpers, L.; de Wit, J.A.; Benschop, A.A.J.; Bivens, D.B., 1991?: "Optimisation of the
efficiency of the ternary refrigerant blend HCFC-22/124/152a in domestic freezer equip-
ment."
Affilation: Philips Research Laboratories, The Netherlands
E.I. DuPont de Nemours, USA

March Consulting Group, 1992: "CFCs in the UK refrigeration and air conditioning indus-
tries: usage and the scope for substitution: a study for the Department of the Environment
carried outä by March Consulting Group", U.K.

Ming-Shan Zhu et al., 1992: "Experimental researches on domestic refrigerators using


HFC-134a as refrigerant." Paper presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration
Conference: Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants, July 14-17, 1992, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.pp. 241-247
Affiliation: Tsinghua University, China
Beijing Snow Flake Electrical Appliance Group Corporation, China

Ming-Shan Zhu, Li-Zhong Han, Xiao-Yu Zhao, 1993: "Dismantling inspection and retrofit
of domestic refrigerator with HFC-134a." Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC
and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., pp. 81-
85
Affiliation: Tsinghua University, China
Beijing Snow Flake Electrical Group Corporation, China

Sandvordenker, K.S., 1992: "R-152a versus 134a in domestic refrigerator/freezer - energy


advantage or energy penalty?". Paper presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration
Conference: Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants, July 14-17, 1992, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. pp. 259-264
Affiliation: Tecumseh Products Research Laboratory, USA

VINEYARD, Edward; SWATKOWSKI, Leonard, 1993: "Energy efficiency of HFC-134a


versus HFC-152a". Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives
Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 86-91
Affiliation: ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Yezheng Wu et al., 1993: "Possibility of using HFC-32/HFC-152a in refrigerator". Paper


presented at the International Conference on CFC and Halon Alternatives, 20-23 April,
1993, Beijing, China. pp.188-193
Affiliation: Xi'an Jiaotong University, China

Zhai Yumin, 1993: "Optimisation of HFC-134a in domestic refrigerator/freezer from real


experimental demonstration." Paper presented at the International Conference on CFC and

43
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Halon Alternatives, 20-23 April, 1993, Beijing, China. pp.47-54


Affiliation: National Research Council Canada

Mobile Air Conditioning


Abraham, Anthony W.: "The availability of parts for retrofit after warranty OEM and
aftermarket perspective." Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alter-
natives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 312-316
Affiliation: Wynn's International (USA)

Anon, 1993. "Technology overview: lubrication is a key issue in CFC phaseout."


Tech Update: News from ARI's Research and Technology Department, August 1993

ASHRAE, 1990: "Refrigeration handbook", Chapter 6, Refrigerant system chemistry:

Atkinson, Ward, Chairman SAE Interior Climate Control Standard Committee: Summary
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) documents relating to mobile air conditioning
systems. April 4, 1994, USA.

Automotive Consulting Group, 1993. "CFC-12 phase-out analysis and the determination of
the required strategic reserve: final report."
Michigan: Automotive Consulting Group, 1993

Bateman, D., 1992: " New refrigerants for MAC". Paper presented at the Asia-Singapore
Conference on the Phasing Out of Ozone Depleting Substances, 5-7 October 1992,
Singapore.
Affiliation: DuPont Company

Bresnahan, John, ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd: Case study. In response to UNEP
IE/PAC retrofitting query.

Calhoun, John, 1993: " The impact of HFC-134a on the manufacture and service of
automotive air conditioning compressors." Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC
and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 285-
293
Affiliation: Sanden International (USA) Ltd

Dekleva, T.W., 1992: " Retrofitting MAC systems with HFC-134a - an update." Paper
presented at the 1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, Sept 29 -Oct 1,
1992, Washington, USA. pp. 697-705
Affiliation: ICI Americas, Inc

Dekleva, T.W.; Colmery, S.H.; Bresnaham, John, 1993: "Fleet trials with vehicles retrofitted
to Klea 134a refrigerant and Emkarate RL lubricants; a perspective after two years on the
road." Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference,

44
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 294-303


Affiliation: ICI Klea
ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd

Encik Haw En Kwi, 1993: " Current status: overview and industry view on available alter-
natives and technologies" Paper presented at the National ODS Conference, Kuala Lumpur,
July 20-23, 1993
Affiliation: _Nippondenso (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

Foster, K., 1994: Mobile Air Conditioning, Workshop on the Protection of the Ozone Layer.
School of Automative Engineering, Croydon Institute, South Australia, Jakarta 11 - 15 April
1994.

Goble, G. H.: A Drop-in CFC-12 Replacement for Automotive Airconditioning. Paper


presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration Conference on Energy Efficiency and New
Refrigerants at the Purdue University, USA in July 1992

Goble, G. H.: Some Safety Studies of a Ternary Refrigerant. Paper presented at the 1994
International Refrigeration Conference at the Purdue University, USA in July 1994.

Hobbs, Arthur, 1993: "Supply, distribution, and availability of mobile air conditioning
parts for retrofit of CFC-12 systems to HFC-134a." Paper presented at the 1993
International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington,
D.C., U.S.A. pp. 304-311
Affiliation: Four Seasons (Division of Standard Motor Products, Inc. USA)

MACS, 1991: 1990 MACS Service Data Book.

MACS, 1992: 1991 MACS Service Data Book

MACS, 1994: Guidelines for Automotive Air Conditioning Retrofit. Convention Issue,
Sahara Hotel, Las Vegas.

McNeal Morris, James: 1992: "Ozone depletion and the automobile aircon industry". Paper
presented at the Asia-Singapore Conference on the Phasing Out of Ozone Depleting
Substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore.
Affiliation: Sanden International (Singapore) Pte Ltd

Roke, Lindsey, 1992: " Report from the Technical Options Committee on Refrigeration".
Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on the Phasing Out of Ozone Depleting
Substances, 5-7 October 1992, Singapore
Affiliation: Fisher and Paykel Ltd (New Zealand)

Rolotti, Gustavo; Brubaker, Michael, 1993: " Experience in retrofitting CFC-12 auto air
conditioning systems with Forane HFC-134a: a system performance perspective.". Paper

45
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October
1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 275-284
Affiliation: Elf Atochem North America

Centrifugal Chillers
Arnaud, D., 1993: "An example of successful retrofit with HFC-134a in the industrial field."
Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22
October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 193-202
Affiliation: Elf Atochem SA, Centre D'Application de Levallois
Elf Atochem North America

Dean Smith, N. et al., 1993: "HFC-236ea: a potential alternative for CFC-114." Paper
presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October
1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 150-157
Affiliation: USEPA
Acurex Environmental Corporation

Kazachki, Georgi S.; Gage, Cynthia L., 1993: "Thermodynamic evaluation and compressor
characteristics of HFC-236ea and HFC-245ca as CFC-114 and CFC-11 replacements in
chillers." Paper presented at the 1993 International CFC and Halon Alternatives
Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. pp. 167-176
Affiliation: Acurex Environmental Corporation

March Consulting Group, 1992: CFCs in the UK refrigeration and air conditioning indus-
tries: usage and the scope for substitution: a study for the Department of the Environment
carried out by March Consulting Group. United Kingdom.

Siebert, Bruce, 1992: "Factors in converting centrifugal chillers to HCFC-123." Paper


presented at the 1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, Sept 29-Oct 1,
1992, Washington, USA. pp. 271-275
Affiliation: The Trane Company, US

Smithart, Eugene L., 1993: " Choosing a building chiller". Paper presented at the 1993
International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, 20-22 October 1993, Washington,
D.C., U.S.A. pp.250-258
Affiliation: The Trane Company, USA

Yan Zu Qing, 1993: "Research on the application of HCFC-123 as an alternative CFC-11


in centrifugal chillers." Paper presented at the International Conference on CFC and Halon
Alternatives, 20-23 April, 1993, Beijing, China. pp. 382-387
Affiliation: Shanghai Hezhong-Carrier Air-Conditioning Equipment Co., China

Cold Storage

46
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Chadderton, T., R. Kemp: Drop-In Alternatives for CFC Refrigeration Systems. Meat
Industry Research Institute of New Zealand. 1993.

Corr, S., Gregson, R. D., Tompsett, G., ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd.: Retrofitting large
refrigeration systems with R-134a. Paper presented at the 1992 International Refrigeration
Conference - Energy Efficiency and New Refrigerants. 14 - 17 July 1992, Purdue University,
USA.

Davey, J.P.; Mulliss, C.C., undated: "Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L". Rhône-Poulenc, UK

Malek, A., CETIM, 1994: Preliminary considerations on retrofitting a cold storage to non-
CFC fluids. Paper presented at the 1994 IIR International Conference for New Applications
of Natural Working Fluids in Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, May 10-13, 1994,
Hannover, Germany. The study has been prepared on consultation with UNEP IE/PAC
OzonAction Programme.

Rhône-Poulenc chemicals, March 1992: Isceons 69-S and Isceons 69-L - Case Studies.

Shaw, D. A, T. Chadderton, R. M. Kemp, Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand:


Retrofitting R12 and R502 Refrigeration Systems with Non-CFC Refrigerants. Paper
presented in proceedings from commissions B1, B2, D1, D2/3, Cold Chain Refrigeration
Equipment by design, 15 - 18 November 1993.

Commercial Refrigeration
Allied Signals Chemicals. Refrigeration Report, An Update from Allied Signal on the
Progress of Environmentally Acceptable Fluorocarbon Alternatives, page 2 & 3: Texas
Supermarket Preparing for Future with Allied Signal's Genetron AZ-50. January 1994.

Chadderton, T. & Kemp, R.: Drop-In Alternatives for CFC Refrigeration Systems. Meat
Industry Research Institute of New Zealand. 1993.

Davey, J.P, et al, Rhône-Poulenc, 1992: Field experience in retrofitting Isceon 134a and
Isceons 69-S and 69-L.

Lawson, C. Curtis, DuPont Fluorochemicals: Alternative Refrigerants for Retrofit of


Existing CFC-12 and R-502 Commercial Refrigeration Systems. Presented at the
International Conference on CFC and Halon Alternatives, Beijing, P.R.C, April 20-23,
1993.

Rhône-Poulenc chemicals, March 1992: Isceon 69-S and Isceon 69-L - Case Studies.

The CFC File, (New Zealand) Issue 1, July 1993

47
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

APPENDIX B
SOME OF THE ORGANISATIONS UNDERTAKING WORK
ON RETROFITTING AND IN CONTACT WITH OAIC

Acurex Environmental Corporation Fisher and Paykel Refrigeration Division


PO Box 13109 P.O. Box 58046
Research NC 27709 Greenmount, Auckland
USA New Zealand
Tel: (1) 919 541-0480 Tel: (64) 9 273 0523
Fax: (1) 919 541-7885 Fax: (64) 9 273 0689
Contact: Georgi Kazachki Contact: Mr Lindsey Roke

Beijing Snow Flake Electrical Appliance Four Seasons


Group Corporation 500 Industrial Park Dr.
Beijing, 100075, Grapevine TX 76051
P.R. China USA
Tel: (86) 01 5073631-379 Tel: (1) 214 471-8000
Contacts: Bin Lu, Lian Yang Fax: (1) 214 393-4416
Contact: Art Hobbs
DuPont Chemicals
1007 Market St Hitachi
Wilmington, DE 19898 7-1-1, Ohmika-cho
USA Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken 319-12
Fax: (1) 302 774 6765 Japan
Contacts: Mr Terry Vogelsberg Tel: (1) 81 294-52-5111
Fax: (1) 81 294 52-7601
Electrolux Contact: Shigeki Komatsuzaki
S-105 45 Stockholm
Sweden ICI Americas
Contact: Mr Rolf Segerström Klea Business
Director of R&D Cold Products CEL Site, Bldg L-21
Tel: (46) 8 738 7005 (Direct) New Castle DE 19720
Tel: (46) 8 738 6000 (Operator) USA
Fax: (46) 8 873 6653 Tel: (1) 302 427-1008
Fax: (1) 302 427-1076
Elf Atochem North America Contact: Mr Tom Dekleva
900 First Ave
King of Prussia PA 19406
USA
Tel: (1) 215 337-6000
Contacts: G.D. Rolotti (Didier Arnaud,
c/- Dick Crooker)

48
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

ICI Chemicals and Plastics in Australia REFAC Consultants


1 Nicholson St 134 Killiney Road
Melbourne, Victoria 3000 Devonshire Court 03-134
Australia Singapore 0923
Contact: John Bresnahan Tel: (65) 235 3991
(10th floor, Head Office) Fax: (65) 235 3991
Tel: (61) 3 665 7927 Contact: Stuart Kelly
Fax: (61) 3 665 7889
Rhone-Poulenc Chemicals
Indian Institute of Technology PO Box 46
Dept of Chemical Engineering St Andrews Road
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Avonmouth Bristol BS11 9YF
Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016 United Kingdom
India Tel: (44 )272 823631
Tel: (91) 11 666 979 Contact: Mr J Davey, B Joyner
Fax: (91) 11 686 2037
Contact: Dr R.S. Agarwal Sanden Intern. (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Sanden House,
National Research Council Canada (NRC) 25 Ang Mo Kio, Street 65
Cold Region Engineering (Build. M 17) Singapore 2056
Montreal Road Tel: (65) 4825500
Ottawa, Canada Fax: (65) 4825500
K1A OR6 Contact: James McNeal Morris
Fax: (613) 954-1235
Tel: (613) 991-1252 Sanden International (USA) Inc.
Contact: Zhai Yumin 601 S Sanden Blvd
Wylie TX 75098
Massey University USA
Department of Process and Environmental Contact: John Calhoun
Technology,
Palmerston North Shanghai Research Institute of General
New Zealand Machinery 200042
Contact: Associate Professor Andrew Shanghai Changning Road 113
Cleland China
Tel: (64) 6 350 5247 Contact: Hua Xiao-Long
Fax: (64) 6 350 5654
Thermo King Norge
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Alfaset 3, Industriv. 6
PO Box 2008 Bldg 3147 0668 Oslo 6
Oak Ridge TN 37831-6070 Norway
USA Tel: (47) 22 32 12 60
Tel: (1) 615 574-0576 Fax: (47) 22 30 63 64
Fax: (1) 615 574-9338
Contact: Ed Vineyard

49
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

Trane Company Xi'an Jiantong University


3600 Pammel Creek Rd Department of Power Machinery
La Crosse WI 54601-7599 Engineering
USA No.28, Xi'an West Road
Tel: (1) 608 787-2251 Xi'an 710049
Contact: Eugene Smithart, Mr Bruce China
Siebert Contacts: Yezheng Zu, Guozhen Xie,
Runxiang Wang, Ziaolin Cao
Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084,
P.R. China
Tel: (86) 01 2594530
Fax: (86) 01 2562765
Contacts: Li-Zhong Han, Ming-Shan Zhu

University of Otago
Department of Physics
University of Otago
Dunedin
New Zealand
Contact: Gerry Carrington - Associate
Professor
Tel: (64) 3 479 7794 (Direct)
Tel: (64) 3 479 1100 (Operator)
Fax: (64) 3 479 0964

University of Waikato
Center for Technology,
Hamilton
New Zealand
Contact: Dr Nigel Sammes
Tel: (64) 7 856 2289
Fax: (64) 7 856 0115
Wynn's Climate Systems
1900 SE Loop 820
Ft. Worth TX 76140
USA
Tel: (1) 817 293-4600
Fax: (1) 817 293-8559
Contact: Anthony Abraham

50
RETROFITTING WITH NON-CFC SUBSTITUTES

APPENDIX C
GUIDELINES FOR AUTOMOTIVE AIR CONDITIONING RETROFIT
MOBILE AIR CONDITIONING SOCIETY
MACS 1994
CONVENTION ISSUE,
SAHARA HOTEL LAS VEGAS, USA

52

Você também pode gostar