I attended a 4 hour long AISC seminar on 2016 AISC
specification and 15th Edition Steel Construction
Manual back in December 2017. With this presentation today, I am going to identify some of the main changes. And for in-depth analysis or the research behind the revisions or changes, you should refer to the commentary to the specifications. I will share with you the Scanned PDF of the original Presentation. With 2005 specification, the conflict between ASD and LRFD was removed and both design philosophies were presented side-by-side, which is still the case for 2016 specification. Also 2016 Specification is adopted by and referenced in IBC 2018. In Seminar, AISC’s goal for 2016 Specification was mentioned to be to again produce a specification that reflects minimal and essential changes from previous editions. A lot of changes were to broaden scope or correct omissions, simply design, improve usability and transparency, and improve editorial content. Some changes were to improve accuracy, economy and safety. Not a lot of changes in Table of contents for Specifications Some of the subject matter within these chapters have been revised. The title of Chapter K has been revised. The reason for this change is that the HSS and Box Section connections are now addressed in Chapter J that addresses the connections in a more generic fashion. The connection requirements in addition to those in Chapter J are addressed in Chapter K. Appendix 1 now includes other advanced analysis methods such as Second Order Elastic Analysis in addition to Inelastic Analysis. The phrase “Design for” was dropped in Title for Appendix 3 because there are other issues related to Fatigue than design alone. For example, fabrication & erection requirements and non- destructive examination is addressed in this Appendix. Appendix 6 title is revised to make it more general as it addresses members other than beam and columns as well. There is another approved standard that is referenced in this specification which is SDI QA/QC -2011. New HSS Standards ASTM 1065 and ASTM 1085 with 50ksi material are added. In addition to that, ASTM 1085 has a Charpy requirement which makes it more suitable for seismic applications. For both of these materials, you will be able to use full wall thickness and full strength of 50ksi for the section as opposed to ASTM A500 where only 93% thickness is allowed to be used in design. There were issues with the manufacturing processes that were specified in all of those old ASTM bolt standards and now they all have been unified under one Umbrella Bolt Standard F3125. Now those bolts are called Grade A325, Grade A490, Grade F1852 and Grade F2280. ASTM F3043 and ASTM F3111 are also added. Both are 200 ksi bolts and have some limitations. Please read those standards before using them. AWS A5.36 “flux cored and metal cored electrodes” has also been added. 2016 Specification now addressed unequal longitudinal weld lengths as compared to equal length longitudinal welds in 2010 Specification. The formula for shear lag factor is revised. Case 4 no longer applies to only to plates welded with only longitudinal welds but now also applies to other shapes welded with only longitudinal welds. Case 2 no longer applies to welded connections unless they use transverse welds in combination with longitudinal welds. U2010 is calculated based on Case 2 of 2010 Specification. Major changes in Chapter E “Design of members for compression” included: o The effective length KL has been replaced by Lc. o Section E7 “Member with Slender Elements” has been completely revised and made it similar to AISI approach. Q factor used in the design of slender element members is replaced by a revised procedure. And the Q is no longer there in the properties Table. o K-factor was first introduced in 1963 Specification. Direct Analysis method is the main preferred method in Chapter C and K-factor is set equal to 1.0 for use with this Direct Analysis Method. KL is replaced with Lc throughout the 2016 specification that is in formulas and Design-aid Tables. The effective length, Lc, can be determined through methods other than those using the effective length factor, K such as Direct Analysis Method, which is outlined in Chapter C of the Specification. The effective length method is provided as a possible design option in Appendix 7. This chart is still available in commentary to Appendix 7 for use in accordance with Appendix 7 requirements. Section J1.8 of 2010 Specification is completely revised and expanded into J1.8 and J1.9 in 2016 Specification. You will have to read it to understand that new revised requirements. In relation to “ Welded alterations to structures with existing Rivets or Bolts” an Example of New Requirement in Section J1.8 is that:
“The weld available strength shall provide the
additional required strength, but not less than 25% of the required strength of the connection.” We have already gone through New Bolt Standard F3125. Group C is added in the specification with F3043 and F3111 high strength bolts of 200ksi material. Even though Group A listing doesn’t show A449 bolts, but specification allow to use ASTM A449 bolts. Minimum bolt pretention, for F3125 bolts with diameters greater than 1 1/8 inches, has increased. This increase was because it was discovered that manufacturers were using 120ksi material for A325 and F1852 bolts, for bolt diameters 1 1/8 inches and greater, instead of 105ksi material as required by the 2010 specification. So, the pretention for a stronger 120ksi bolt material will be more and so the Table 2-6 for “Applicable ASTM Specifications for Various Types of Structural Fasteners” was updated to reflect 120 ksi for Gr. A325 and Gr. F1852 bolts. There were fitting issues, for the Bolts greater than 1 inch diameter, in bolt holes, due to manufacturing standards. Based on research from 1950s, it was found that for the Bolts greater than 1 inch diameter, the 1/8 inch oversize hole does not adversely affect the bolt strength. 1/16 inch oversize hole can still be used. Some other changes are o Minimum bolt hole clear spacing o And Revised presentation of bearing and tearout equations. As discussed in an earlier slide, HSS connection details were brought from Chapter K to Section J10. Previously the washer requirements were within AISC specifications, but now they are referenced from RCSC Specification. The Code of Standard Practice became an ANSI Standard Appendix A “Digital Building Product Models” has been deleted and all the Model Language is now incorporated into main chapters of this Code of Standard Practice. Since 2010 Specification, the use of digital models have increased significantly on many projects. For Example, The Design Models from design softwares are being seamlessly transferred into their detailing software model and it is helping to reduce the cost & schedule of the project. This term “Approval Documents” was developed because model are being developed and exchanged more commonly. For Example, a design model is being sent to a detailer and the detailer produces fabrication & erection model and sent back for EOR approval and sent back for corrections and then being used in the shop to produce steel. So it seems that, all these changes regarding Design/Fabrication/Erection/Approval Documents which includes both drawings and models, provides more flexibility contractually. So, the stiffening elements such as continuity and doubler plates, were often missed in connection design when bidding. Section 3.1.2 in 2016 Specification clarifies the responsibility of connection stiffening. For Options 1 or 2 or 3A, ODRD “Owner Designated Representative for Design” design stiffening and shows on structural design bid documents. For Option 3B, ODRD provides an estimate of bidding quantity of items for stiffening and incase incorrect or no estimate is provided, that may result into additional costs. Few years ago the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction developed this document “Guide for Specifying Architecturally Exposed Structural Steel”. Code Committee reviewed this document and found a lot of good information and tried to incorporate in 2016 version of the Code. Basic elements in AESS-1 are those that have workmanship requirements that exceed what would be done in non-AESS construction. Feature elements in AESS-2 and -3 exceed basic requirements, but the intent is to allow the viewer to see the art of metalworking. o AESS-2 is Feature Elements when viewed at a distance greater than 20ft o AESS-3 is Feature Elements when viewed at a distance less than or equal to 20ft Showcase elements AESS-4 are Custom elements that have real fine finish. Don’t specify more that what you/owner really needs as that will result into cost increase for the owner. There were cases where no tolerance requirements were assumed when none were mentioned in Sections 5, 6, 7, and 10. The second sentence as highlighted that was added clarifies that. It’s a newly added section. The protected zones now need to be permanently marked for the life of the building per AISC 341 Section A4.1. This requirement was absent in 2010 Code of Standard Practice. There have been changes but the titles of the Table of Contents have not changed. Notice that Part 16 now includes the latest versions of the standards. Some very large and heavy Wide Flange shapes have been added. We have to make sure to check availability of these shapes on AISC website and with local fabricator before we use them on our projects. Based on input from mills, k_detailing along with T dimension have changed due to change in the rolling tolerances. This has changed for many shapes. For the larger angles and double angles, thicker gusset plate will be need and will require bigger separation distance. For A500 HSS Shapes, Gr C is the preferred steel grade which means you can take advantage of 50ksi material strength for rectangular HSS shapes and 46ksi for round HSS shapes.. 50ksi plates can be used for plates upto 4 inch thick. Check availability of shapes in these material strengths. Strength does not increase for Elastic Flexural Buckling. Greatest strength increase will be seen for the least slender column (inelastic flexural buckling). A lot of design information is presented in this table and that’s why its being called Super Table. Information such as Available Strengths for Members Subject to: o Axial o Shear o Flexure about Major and Minor Axes o Combined Forces Also miscellaneous other design information in one place. Table 10-1 in 2010 Specification had a section at the bottom dealing with “Beam Web Available Strength”. The bottom portion of the table is now removed because it was causing lot of confusion for many people. The design checks in that part of the table still have to be made. For the Extended single-plate shear connection design, based on latest research in 2016 by Thornton, the requirement of Stabilizer plates is removed. A method to design a double row extended Single- Plate Shear connection is included in 15th edition. Weld details for Skewed Single-plate connections have been revised and have some additions. Anchor Hole and Washer sizes are increased to address field requirements and to correlate with ACI117. F844 washers will be less expensive than plate washers.