Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Annual Report
Punjab Irrigated Agriculture Productivity
Improvement Project (PIPIP),
2016-17
41-A Lawrence Road, Lahore
Phone# 042-99200835
http://pipip.punjab.gov.pk
Annual Report
2016 – 17
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
With the objective to provide a summary of overall
during the year 2016-17 in Punjab. It is expected that this report will be a source of
authentic information for all those who are directly or indirectly related to this
project.
Collection of information and analysis of data for a program spread over the
entire province, does involve dedicated efforts on the part of PMU team. In the
preparation of this edition I have been fortunate in being able to count on the
support of all the colleagues of the PMU. Their team spirit, enriched with
commitment and devotion has made this report a presentable document. I am
especially appreciative of Mr. Riaz Ahamed, Deputy Project Director and Mr. Tariq
Mahmood, Deputy Director Technical for their professional contributions. I hope
that the whole PMU team will keep up the same professional approach with the
same zeal & zest in future.
CONTENTS
Page
SECTION
No.
1 Acknowledgements i
2 Contents Ii
PUNJAB PROVINCE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Each project is unique in its nature. It involves the individuals who are new to it
and the circumstances which are most of the time different than the overall working
environment. In development projects things often turn out differently than expected.
Projects even with a good planning, adequate organizational machinery and sufficient
flow of resources cannot automatically achieve the desired results. There must be some
warning mechanism, which can alert the organization about its possible successes and
failures, off and on. Constant watching not only saves wastage of scarce resources but
also ensure speedy execution of the project. Hence, an affective and dynamic monitoring
system has proved to be the linchpin for success of a project. Monitoring is systematic
collection and analysis of information to identify and measure progress over a period of
time. It enables a continuing critique of the project implementation. The PMU, PIPIP is
one of the few successful examples of such interventions in Punjab. It has been
affectively performing the function of continuous monitoring and has been
providing the required warning mechanism for the NPIW & PIPIP during the last
thirteen years of the PMU life.
Year 2011-2012 was the pilot phase of the project and the regular project is for a
period of five years from July, 2012 to June, 2017. This mega initiative envisages
installation of Drip and Sprinkler Irrigation Systems on 1,20,000 acres, improvement
This Annual Report, which is 13th in a row, pertains to the financial year 2016-17.
Like previous few, this year also proved to be a bit difficult. During the year under
review, component wise achievement of targets is as under: -
C. Provision of LASER Land Levelling Units: Target of 2970 unit was assigned
to the province, against which, 3833 (129%), units were booked, 2990 (101%) Work
Order were issued and 2500 (84%) units were delivered to farmers/ service
providers. Pakpattan (119%), Okara (130%), Lahore (103%) and Sheikhupura (104%)
are the districts, where delivery of units was 100% or more. Other districts achieved
67% to 94% delivery of LASER units.
Target %
Name of Component Achieved
(Nos.) age
Construction of Rainwater Harvesting Ponds 35 68 194
In view of the achievements for the year 2016-17, which was comparatively a
difficult year, it is expected that during the coming years when the Punjab Irrigated
Agriculture Productivity Improvement Project, envisaging multiple modern
challenging initiatives will be under implementation, the same good performance will
be repeated by the PIPIP staff as well as the PMU.
FCR
Name of District Target ICR-I ICR-II
Verified % age
Bahawalpur 61 80 77 75 123
R.Y Khan 125 140 139 139 111
Bahawalnagar 34 46 40 40 118
D.G Khan 63 86 81 65 103
MuzaffarGarh 113 154 146 105 93
Layyah 11 12 12 12 109
Rajanpur 68 85 82 82 121
Faisalabad 23 23 23 23 100
Jhang 42 43 40 38 90
Chiniot 15 19 18 15 100
T.T Singh 1 1 1 1 100
Sargodha 97 95 91 83 86
Khushab 27 28 27 27 100
Bhakkar 70 77 68 68 97
Mianwali 26 30 29 25 96
Multan 134 150 144 76 57
Khanewal 98 113 110 87 89
Vehari 99 107 106 82 83
Lodhran 88 101 99 97 110
Sahiwal 29 41 37 26 90
Pakpattan 42 48 40 39 93
Okara 119 140 121 90 76
Lahore 9 12 12 10 111
Sheikhupura 77 83 82 78 101
Nankana Sahib 11 12 12 9 82
Kasur 106 128 117 117 110
Gujranwala 86 108 98 98 114
Hafizbad 43 49 43 40 93
Narowal 2 2 2 2 100
Sialkot 17 22 21 21 124
M.B Din 23 28 28 27 117
Gujrat 1 3 3 3 300
Total: - 1760 2066 1949 1700 97
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150 150
ICR-II -
FCR
100 100 TBAP
Actual
50 TBAP 50
Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120 Work Order Issued 120
Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
TBAP
40 40 TBAP
Actual
20 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150 150
ICR-II FCR
100 100 TBAP
Actual
50 TBAP 50
Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
TBAP 80 TBAP
80
Actual Actual
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 TBAP
80
60
Actual
60
TBAP 40
40
Actual 20
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Installation of High Efficiency Irrigation System (HEIS)
During 2016-17, in district Khanewal, against the 120
target of 275 acres, commissioning was verified at Work Order Issued
100
only 53 (19%) upto 30-06-2017. Figures B1, B2 & B3
80
compare the actual work pace (Work Order Issued,
Material Verified and Commissioning Verified) viz- 60 TBAP
a-viz TBAP on quarterly basis. The figures show 40 Actual
that actual achievement did not commensurate with 20
TBAP throughout the year. Resultantly 100%
0
commissioning could not be got verified within
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
stipulated period.
Fig-B1
120
120
Material Verified Commissioning Verified
100 100
80 80 TBAP
TBAP
60 60 Actual
Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120 120
100 ICR-II 100 FCR
80 80
60 60 TBAP
Actual
40 TBAP 40
20 Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Installation of High Efficiency Irrigation System (HEIS)
During 2016-17, in district Vehari, against the target 120
of 275 acres, commissioning was verified at only 45
Work Order Issued
100
(16%) upto 30-06-2017. Figures B1, B2 & B3 compare
80
the actual work pace (Work Order Issued, Material
Verified and Commissioning Verified) viz-a-viz 60 TBAP
TBAP on quarterly basis. The figures show that 40 Actual
actual achievement did not commensurate with 20
TBAP throughout the year. Resultantly 100%
0
commissioning could not be got verified within
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
stipulated period.
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120
120 Work Order Unit Delivered
100 100
Issued
80 80
60 60
40
TBAP 40 TBAP
Actual 20 Actual
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 TBAP Actual
80 TBAP
80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Installation of High Efficiency Irrigation System (HEIS)
During 2016-17, in district Lodhran, against the 120
target of 275 acres, commissioning was verified at
Work Order Issued
100
only 33 (12%) upto 30-06-2017. Figures B1, B2 & B3
80
compare the actual work pace (Work Order Issued,
60 TBAP
Material Verified and Commissioning Verified) viz- Actual
a-viz TBAP on quarterly basis. The figures show 40
that actual achievement did not commensurate with 20
TBAP throughout the year. Resultantly 100%
0
commissioning could not be got verified within
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
stipulated period.
Fig-B1
80 TBAP 80
TBAP
60 Actual 60 Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
TBAP 40 TBAP
40
Actual Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150 120
ICR-II 100 FCR
TBAP
100 80 TBAP
Actual
60 Actual
50 40
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120 120
Material Verified Commissioning Verified
100 100
80 TBAP 80
60 Actual 60
40 40 TBAP
20 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120 120
ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 TBAP
80
60 Actual
60
TBAP
40 40
Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120
150
Material Verified Commissioning
100
Verified
100 TBAP 80
Actual 60
50 40 TBAP
20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120
120 Work Order Issued Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150
150 ICR-II FCR
TBAP 100 TB…
100
50 50
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120 Unit Delivered
120 Work Order Issued
100 100
80 80 TBAP
60 Actual
60
40 TBAP 40
20
Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 TBAP
80 TBAP
80 Actual Actual
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120
120 Material Verified Commissioning Verified
100 100
80 TBAP 80 TBAP
60 Actual 60 Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120 Work Order Issued 120
Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 TBAP
80 TBAP
80 Actual Actual
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
150 ICR-II 100 FCR
TBAP
100 Actual 80 TBAP
60 Actual
50 40
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
TBAP 40 TBAP
40
Actual Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60
TBAP
60
Actual
40 TBAP 40
Actual 20
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
80 TBAP 80
TBAP
60 Actual 60
Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 Actual 60 Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 TBAP 80
60 Actual 60
TBAP
40 40 Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120
120 Material Verified Commissioning Verified
100 100
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
TBAP
60 60
Actual
40 TBAP 40
20 Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II FCR
100 100
80 TBAP
80 Actual
60 60
40 TBAP 40
20 Actual 20
0
0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A3
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 TBAP
80
Actual
60 60
40 TBAP 40
20 Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Work Order Issued 120
120 Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
150 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 80
60 TBAP
50 TBAP 40 Actual
Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 TBAP 80
TBAP
60 Actual 60
Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 40 TBAP
TBAP
20 20 Actual
Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60 TBAP
60 TBAP Actual
40 Actual 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
50 TBAP 50 TBAP
Actual Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60 TBAP
60
TBAP 40
Actual
40
Actual 20
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80 TBAP
TBAP
60 Actual
60 Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
150 Unit Delivered
150 Work Order
Issued
100 100
50 TBAP 50 TBAP
Actual Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
150 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 80
60 TBAP
TBAP 40 Actual
50
Actual
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100 TBAP
80 TBAP
80 Actual
Actual
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP
60 60
Actual
40 TBAP 40
Actual 20
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120
120 Work Order Issued Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80 TBAP
60 Actual
60
40 TBAP 40
20 Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 Actual 60 Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 40 TBAP
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60 60 TBAP
40 TBAP 40 Actual
Actual 20
20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120 Commissioning Verified
120 Material Verified
100 100
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
80 80
60 60
40 40 TBAP
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
TBAP
60 60 TBAP
Actual
40 40 Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
120
120
Material Verified Commissioning Verified
100 100
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60 Actual
Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 40 TBAP
20 TBAP 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60 60 TBAP
40 TBAP 40 Actual
20 Actual 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40
TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120 ICR-II 100 FCR
100
80 80
60 60
TBAP TBAP
40 40 Actual
Actual
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
100 TBAP 80
Actual 60
50 40 TBAP
20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120
120 Work Order Issued Unit Delivered
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
TBAP TBAP
20 20 Actual
Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150
150 ICR-II FCR
100 100
TBAP
50 TBAP 50 Actual
Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
80 80
TBAP
TBAP 60
60 Actual
Actual 40
40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
80 80
60 60
40 40
TBAP TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
150
150 ICR-II FCR
TBAP
100 Actual 100
TBAP
50 Actual
50
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
80 TBAP 80
Actual 60 TBAP
60
Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
80 80
60 60
40 40 TBAP
TBAP
20 Actual
20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
compare the actual work pace (ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR) TBAP
200
Actual
viz-a-viz TBAP on quarterly basis. The figures show
100
that actual achievements commensurated with
TBAP and resultantly300% targets were achieved 0
within stipulated period. Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A1
400
400 ICR-II FCR
300 300
TBAP
Actual 200 TBAP
200
Actual
100 100
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
Fig-B1
Fig-B2 Fig-B3
Fig-C1
120
120 Work Order Unit Delivered
100
100 Issued
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20 Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-C2 Fig-C3
D. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120
Material Verified Commissioning
100
100 Verified
80 80
TBAP TBAP
60 60
Actual Actual
40 40
20 20
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
120
Material Verified Commissioning
100 100
Verified
80 80
60 60
40 TBAP 40 TBAP
20
Actual 20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
Fig-A1
120
150
Material Verified Commissioning
100
Verified
100 TBAP 80
Actual 60
50 40 TBAP
20 Actual
0 0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A2 Fig-A3
B. Provision of Solar System on HEIS Sites
During 2016-17, in district Jhelum, against the target 120 Work Order Issued
of 875 acres, commissioning was verified at only 511 100
(58%) upto 30-06-2017. Figures A1, A2 &A3 compare TBAP
80
the actual work pace (Work Order Issued, Material
60 Actual
Verified and Commissioning Verified) viz-a-viz
TBAP on quarterly basis. The figures show that 40
actual achievement did not commensurate with TBAP 20
and resultantly100% commissioning could not be
0
got verified within stipulated period.
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 June-17
Fig-A1
Fig-A2 Fig-A3