Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
B
Key words: anxiety; pain; nausea/vomiting;
breast cancer; acupuncture
ONF, 43(6), 725–732. reast cancer will develop in about one in eight U.S. women during
their lifetimes, and surgical intervention is an important component
doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.725-732
of care for patients with breast cancer (American Cancer Society, 2016;
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2015). Patients undergoing
breast cancer surgery may experience complications and distressing
symptoms, including pain, nausea, and vomiting, that affect quality of life. Pain
can lead to increased length of stay, increased readmissions, and decreased qual-
ity of life (Hutchison, 2007; Potter, Thomson, Greenwood, Hopwood, & Winters,
2009; Ware, Bruckenthal, Davis, & O’Conner-Von, 2011). Challenges still exist in
relieving pain in the postoperative period (Hutchison, 2007; Ware et al., 2011).
In a study by Fecho et al. (2009), 58% of women undergoing mastectomies expe-
rienced severe postoperative pain immediately after surgery, and 22% of those
same patients experienced severe pain at one month. Postoperative nausea and
vomiting (PONV) occurs in about 75 million patients annually (Collins, 2011).
In a survey to identify research priorities, Oncology Nursing Society mem-
bers were asked to report the top three symptoms that were most distressing
Statistical Analysis
The acupuncture treatments were delivered using The primary interest for the current analysis was to
Japanese-manufactured Seirin J-Type, plastic-handled, compare mean change in pain, nausea, anxiety, and
stainless steel single-use needles, which were 30 mm coping scores by treatment group (i.e., acupuncture
in length and either 0.16 mm, 0.18 mm, or 0.2 mm in versus control) and to assess changes at two different
diameter. All acupuncture treatments were delivered time points. All analyses were performed using SAS®,
by a single licensed acupuncturist with more than six version 9.3. Visit 1 and visit 2 measures were calcu-
years of experience. lated as mean plus and minus standard deviations
In the usual care group, the research coordinator in- at pre- and post-treatment times. Means of pre- and
structed the participant to enter pain, nausea, anxiety, post-treatment measurements were compared using
and ability to cope scores into the tablet. The research paired, two-sided Student’s t tests. P values were
coordinator then left the patient’s room and returned calculated comparing acupuncture and control mean
an average of 32 minutes later to collect the second set change scores using unpaired two-sided Student’s t
of scores. The number and times of visits were deter- tests. Tests of equal variances were performed, and p
mined by the patient’s availability, the research staff’s values for statistical differences between the groups
availability, and the time of hospital discharge. were adjusted by pooled or Satterthwaite methods for
Both groups entered scores into a tablet computer. equal or unequal variances, respectively. All tests of
All scores were not visible once entered into the tab- significance were two-sided, and a p value was con-
let, so the acupuncturist and research coordinator sidered statistically significant if it was less than 0.05.
Anxiety 2.33 1.8 1 1.31 –1.33 1.59 0.006 1.27 1.39 1.8 2.37 0.53 2.88 0.484
Coping 6.67 2.72 8.53 2.17 1.87 2.97 0.029 8.53 1.81 8.07 2.25 –0.47 1.36 0.204
Nausea 2.6 3.31 1.07 2.12 –1.53 2.7 0.045 0.27 0.46 1 1.69 0.73 1.75 0.127
Pain 4.2 1.01 2.73 1.39 –1.47 1.06 < 0.001 3.67 2.13 3.60 1.99 –0.07 1.67 0.879
Note. All p values were calculated from paired t tests comparing pre- and postintervention and pre- and post–standard care
outcome scores. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Note. Numeric rating scales from 0–10 were used for anxiety, nausea, pain, and ability to cope, with higher scores indicating
more anxiety, nausea, or pain, as well as increased ability to cope.
Anxiety 1.4 1.65 0.5 0.71 –0.9 1.45 0.081 1.57 1.5 1.71 1.82 0.14 1.03 0.612
Coping 7.6 3.06 7.9 3.73 0.3 3.06 0.763 8.5 1.51 8.57 1.7 0.07 0.47 0.583
Nausea 1 1.7 0.5 0.97 –0.5 1.27 0.244 0.79 1.97 0.5 1.16 –0.29 1.38 0.453
Pain 3.1 1.52 1.6 1.35 –1.5 0.97 < 0.001 3.07 2.13 2.64 2.31 –0.43 1.02 0.139
Note. All p values were calculated from paired t tests comparing pre- and postintervention and pre- and post–standard care
outcome scores. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Note. Numeric rating scales from 0–10 were used for anxiety, nausea, pain, and ability to cope, with higher scores indicating
more anxiety, nausea, or pain, as well as increased ability to cope.
Note. In the intervention group, three participants did not receive a second visit, and two participants were deleted from the
analysis because of a technological error. In the control group, one participant did not receive a second visit.
Results are particularly promising considering that self-administered acupressure to support patients be-
the usual length of hospital stay for women undergo- ing able to receive treatment at times other than when
ing mastectomies is 1.9 days. Mehling et al. (2007) in the hospital. In addition, as identified previously,
did a study with delivery of acupuncture to patients acupuncture could provide a nonpharmacologic
with cancer on postoperative days one and two that intervention as adjunctive to or as an alternative for
assessed the effects of acupuncture and massage. pharmacologic intervention without the side effects
Although Mallory et al. (2015) also examined women of medications.
postoperatively, the researchers did not identify the Although Mehling et al.’s (2007) study was not able
number of days the patients were in the hospital or to demonstrate a reduction in anxiety in postopera-
how many days the patient received acupuncture. tive patients with cancer with the use of acupuncture,
The outcomes from the current study support that the current authors’ results show a reduction in
acupuncture can be delivered in patients with a short- anxiety at visits 1 and 2. Data on patient perception of
ened length of hospital stay. anxiety was collected immediately after the acupunc-
Other researchers also demonstrated reductions in ture treatment in the current study, and Mehling et
pain for patients following surgery for cancer, including al. (2007) allowed for a three-hour window that could
abdominal, pelvic, prostate, testicular, bladder, kidney, suggest the effect of the acupuncture decreases over
breast cancer, or head and neck cancer (Mallory et time. Mehling et al. (2007) also measured anxiety with
al., 2015; Mehling et al., 2007; Pfister et al., 2010). Pain “tension” from the short form of the Profile of Mood
management for postoperative pain with medication is States. Conceptually, anxiety and tension differ, and
not without risks from possible side effects. Therefore, patients were measuring tension as opposed to anxi-
in addition to patients dealing with symptom manage- ety in that study.
ment of cancer or from surgery, they may also need
to manage symptoms from medications given for pain Limitations
relief. Providing acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy A limitation of the study is that the acupuncture
to medication intervention may decrease side effects treatment was not blinded. However, this is challeng-
by having patients require less pain medication. ing. Two types of sham acupuncture exist: penetrative
Acupuncture was demonstrated to decrease nausea or non-penetrative. A study by Vase et al. (2015) exam-
in the current study, which is consistent with results ined whether acupuncture could be double-blinded in
from a Cochrane Review (Lee & Fan, 2009), as well a randomized, controlled trial with a non-penetrating
as a systematic review and meta-analysis (Cheong, needle and was not successful.
Zhang, Huang, & Zhang, 2013). Lee and Fan (2009) Other limitations of the study are its small sample
and Cheong et al. (2013) concluded that acupuncture size and lack of diversity. The results of this study,
prevented postoperative nausea and vomiting. How- along with the results of the Mallory et al. (2015) and
ever, those researchers examined studies that use Mehling et al. (2007) studies, provide support for
acupressure in addition to acupuncture by delivery additional studies with a larger sample sizes to evalu-
of an acupuncturist. Further studies should explore ate acupuncture for symptoms following surgery for